NHF Board Member Managing tenant scrutiny 2 Feb...

21
NHF Board Member conference Managing tenant scrutiny 2 nd Feb 2013

Transcript of NHF Board Member Managing tenant scrutiny 2 Feb...

NHF Board

Member

conference

Managing

tenant scrutiny

2nd Feb 2013

What is required? – involvement in housing related

policies & services; scrutiny of performance & support

for “the formation and activities of tenant panels”

Ensuring that landlords deliver good services to tenants

Self-regulation – “Landlords are accountable to their

tenants, not to the regulator. Tenants must have the

information and opportunities they need to hold

landlords to account and to shape service delivery.”

Department of Communities & Local Government

Honest and robust, evidence based self-assessment,

external challenge & regular reporting to tenants

Designated Tenant Panels

Designated Tenant Panels

• the formal role of referring

complaints to the Housing

Ombudsman

• honest broker role -

constructive challenge

• debate with tenants about

setting up designated panels

• an audit trail for decisions

• none, one or more than one

• relationships with other

designated persons

• national register of

Designated Tenant Panels

“Tenants know their housing

better than anyone. They are

best placed to know what’s

working and what isn’t. Good

landlords understand that

listening to tenants is not just

the right thing to do. It is also

good for business”.

Getting outcomes for

tenants

Banning the phrase “best practice”

• Soha - Portfolio holders and scrutiny approach

• Gentoo – standards based groups & “Customer Link”

• Helena – scrutiny & Young Inspectors

• Paradigm - Resident Internal Auditors

• Preston - Gateway Tenant Committee

• Rooftop - Resident Action Team

Tenant scrutiny

• different ways for tenants to be involved in scrutiny

• recruitment to scrutiny panels – the chairing role?

• the independence issue?

• ensuring that tenants can constructively challenge

• methods to choose what will be scrutinised

Guides & information available at: www.nationaltenants.org

Nic Bliss [email protected] 07947 019287

National Housing Federation Board Members’ Conference

Tenant scrutiny – how are you managing this?

2nd February 2013

Yvonne Davies

Scrutiny and Empowerment Partners Ltd

audit

inspection /

regulation

the press

elections

management

processes customer

insight / complaints

competition

/ choice local authority

board members social media

redress

Co-regulation and scrutiny - part of a

wider web of landlord accountability

Challenges and opportunities

“Get the culture right: tenants, board and staff need to trust and respect eachother for co-regulation to work well”

Soha Housing

What happens during scrutiny – common approaches

Scrutiny in 13 -17 weeks

• Presentation from Manager on the service

• Service review of promises made to tenants

• Testing promises - interviews, focus groups, observation, shadowing, mystery shopping, reviewing satisfaction, performance and benchmarking (quality as well as data).

• Report writing – pulling together strengths and weaknesses and recommendations (commonly tested on officers first)

• Presentation to Board

• Actions - agreement and planning

• Monitoring – by who and when?

Four principles of effective scrutiny

Advantages to Board of the Scrutiny Challenge (1)

Evidenced based recommendations helps Boards to fulfil responsibilities and meet organisational objectives

Provides assurance about performance and contributes to good governance

Evidences how decisions are working on the ground

Additional source of in depth consumer opinion, on top of that already gleaned from Tenant Board Members

Provides feedback on what tenants might find acceptable in times of cuts

“Our annual report was large and costly in production; resident engagement enable sit to be reduced to a few pages of interest

on what residents wanted to know”

Family Housing (Birmingham)

Advantages to Board of the Scrutiny Challenge (2)

More tenant shaped services = increased satisfaction

Boards hear from tenants and nothing is filtered – supports openness and transparency

Helps to tighten up involvement structures, make them more focussed and triggers actions on real priorities

Removes assumption and presumption, gives a real reality check on the quality of services and the priorities of tenants

Complements the challenge from the Board

“Many organisations have only got the critical aspect of co-regulation. It is the ‘friend’ which enables us to work together

to solve problems”

Amicus Horizon

Scrutiny Panels and Boards – different starting points

Re-inventing involvement: Riverside Housing Group – 2 years

Value for Money: New Charter Scrutiny Panel -£100,000 saving in the grounds maintenance contract and options for local labour

Meeting up: Wirral Partnership Homes & Advisory and Scrutiny Panel – quarterly meetings with Chair and CEO

Strategy: East Durham Homes & Customer Inspection and Improvement Panel - task & finish groups & 12 month joint plans Joint Complaint Panels: Together Housing, New Charter, City West and Salix Homes - working together, independence and value

“There may be pressure to get results quickly. It needs time for those involved to truly understand what is expected of them and how they might go about achieving it. Training and support is essential”

Wherry HA

Scrutiny Panels and Boards – different approaches

• Choosing subjects for scrutiny at Board: varies , either one a year (recommended only) or, left to the tenants.

• Fabrick Housing Group: 2 landlords, 2 Resident Scrutiny Panel > 2 Performance Committees

• Trafford Housing Trust: Quality & Improvement Panel > Board

• Liverpool Mutual Homes: Tenant Scrutiny Panel > Customer Experience Committee of Tenant Board Members

• Soha Housing: Virtual scrutiny meetings

• Salix Homes: The Senate – Board delegation of performance top level review

“ What are you afraid of?”

Peter Styche, Board Chair:

Helena Partnerships and Salix Homes

Bed time reading Developing tenant scrutiny

and co-regulation in social housing (lessons from the co-regulatory champions)

Stories in tenants scrutiny and co-regulation in social housing (Case Studies)

Top tips for tenants: holding your landlord to account through scrutiny

Publications page of: www.tenantadvisor.net/events

Remember – Boards and staff need training too!

[email protected] Tel: 07867 974659 www.tenantadvisor.net Free news pages – housing & social policy developments Or Join Us - over 30 other landlords and become a member and access landlord scrutiny reports, advice and what works for others.