News

Y2K

June 25, 2007

Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting

June 12th Meeting Agenda

Time Topics

8:30 – 12:00

Energy Frontier – ILC, LHC, and beyond

1. ILC R&D, System Test, Industrialization ILC Scenarios

2. LHC accelerator upgrades

3. R&D steps needed for colliders beyond ILC and LHC

1:00 – 4:00

Physics Opportunities beyond Energy Frontier

1. Physics Review: , , K, B, C, …

2. Required Facilities:

a) Reconfiguration of existing accelerator complex

b) New accelerators

Review of Required Facilities

4:00 – 6:00 Sketching Possible Roadmaps

6:00 – 6:30 Final Report Format

Physics Opportunities

• Accelerator Based, Not Energy Frontier– Neutrino Physics– Precision measurements involving

charged leptons and quarks

• Needed Facilities– High intensity , , K, anti-proton beams– High luminosity colliders

• Criteria

– Will the physics be important in a global context when the experiment is done?

– Can it be done uniquely or substantially better at Fermilab than at other labs?

– Is the experiment unique in its physics reach?

• Timeline

– Near term (2007-2012)

• Experiments that could start construction “soon”

– Mid term (2012-2022)

Physics Opportunities: Criteria

• “Reconfiguration of existing accelerator complex” followed by “higher intensity proton sources” offers a rich program of neutrino, kaon and muon physics in near and longer term

– Physics driver is search for Beyond the Standard Model Physics

• “Antiproton source” offers short term (and small scale) opportunity for hyperon CP violation

• Longer term (and larger scale) opportunities:– Flavor physics at Super B factory– Electroweak Precision at Giga-Z– Need community-wide input on priorities

Physics Group: Conclusions

ILC Scenarios Considered

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 20202008

EDR

1. Baseline (Technically Driven Schedule)

Construction Run

EDR ConstructionFunding Cycle

2. ILC Slow by ~2 years (e.g. waiting for LHC results, …)

EDR ConstructionFunding Cycle

3. ILC Slow by ~5 years (e.g. waiting for LHC results, international agreements, …)

EDR

4. LHC says we need > 1 TeV

Funding Cycle

EDR Complete, LHC 1st DataCan we see the horizon? ILC Decision

5. ILC Offshore: To be discussed

FY 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

In all scenarios

Energy Frontier

Tevatron Run Run

LHC detector upgrade Fund Cyc. Build Build Build Build Build Run Run Run Run Run

CLIC, Muon Collider, VLHC R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D

Advanced Accelerator R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D

Neutrino

MINOS, MiniBooNE, SciBooNE Run Run Run Run

MINERvA Build Build Run Run Run

NOvA Build Build Build Run Run Run

Particle Astrophysics

1. ILC baseline scenario

ILC EDR EDR EDR Fund Cyc. Build Build Build Build Build Build Build Run Run

sNuMI ++ Fund Cyc. Build Build Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Run

2. ILC slow LHC Results, …

ILC EDR EDR EDR R&D R&D Fund Cyc. Build Build Build Build Build Build Build

LHC Upgrade Fund Cyc. Build Build Build Build Run Run Run Run Run Run

sNuMI ++ Fund Cyc. Build Build Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Run

non accelerator research

3. ILC slow R&D, fund, build, …

ILC EDR EDR EDR R&D R&D R&D R&D R&D Fund Cyc. Build Build Build Build

LHC Upgrade Fund Cyc. Build Build Build Build Run Run Run Run Run Run

Project X (8GeV & 120 GeV

intense proton sources: ILC-like)

Fund Cyc. Build Build Build Build Run Run Run Run Run

4. LHC says need > 800 GeV

5. ILC Off-shore

End Game ofFNAL Strategic Plan / Roadmap

• Communicated with

– Fermilab Program Advisory Committee– Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee Chair– P5 Chair– HEPAP Chair– Robin Staffin

• Steering Group Final Report to Pier Oddone– August 1, 2008– Physics opportunities

accelerator facility roadmap examples of experiments/physics along the roadmap

• Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee (AAC) meeting– Review of the accelerator facility roadmap– August 8-10, 2007

• Fermilab Program Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting– Review of the physics roadmap– Early November, 2007 (TBD)

• P5– Steering Group Report to P5 (final report)

• September 24-25, 2007

– P5 review of the FNAL roadmap• Recommendations from FNAL AAC and PAC as input• ~Feb, 2008

• HEPAP– Steering Group Report to HEPAP (progress report)

• July 13, 2007

– Steering Group Report to HEPAP (final report)• November 2008

– P5 Report to HEPAP• ~July 2008

Jul2007

Aug2007

Sep2007

Oct2007

Nov2007

Dec2007

Jan2008

Feb2008

Mar2008

Apr2008

May2008

Jun2008

Jul2008

Jun2007

P5 Review

FNALAAC

Review

SG Reportto P5

FNALPAC

Review

SG Reportto HEPAP

Steering Group (SG) Reportto Pier Oddone

Good timing for FY10 Budget

Preparation

SG ReportPAC

P5 Reportto HEPAP

SG Reportto HEPAP

Report from Accelerator Subgroups 4, 5

Subgroup 4 (Accelerator Facilities)• Steve Hohmes got FNAL people to look into various

options which were presented to the Steering group:

– Dave McGinnis is leading effort to come up with a more complete concept on Project X, including synergies with ILC.

– Mike Syphers is leading effort to understand utilization of the Tevatron as either a high intensity 800 GeV fixed target machine, or a 120 GeV stretcher ring.

– Sergei Ngaitsev is identifying possible synergies between SuperB factory and an ILC damping ring.

• Steve will present these efforts on July 9-10 meeting.

Subgroup 5 (Beyond ILC)

• This week’s activities– Meeting with Bob Palmer to understand what is

needed for muon collider stay alive