news_558490

download news_558490

of 31

Transcript of news_558490

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    1/31

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    2/31

    Introduction

    Researchers have studied the problem of how to reduce

    workplace accidents for more than a century.

    2

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    3/31

    Hogans research has identified three elements most critical to improvingworkplace safety. These components form the basis of the SafeSystem .

    Introduction

    3

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    4/31

    Organizations have a financial and ethical obligation to create safeenvironments

    Traditional research and focus has not solved the problems

    Progress in workplace safety and organizational health will advance more

    quickly by structuring the topic into three components A culture of worker engagement Worker personality Organizational leadership

    Introduction

    4

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    5/31

    When using the Hogan SafeSystem as an integrated solution, organizationscan drive a seamless set of activities focused on safety.

    Key Components:Employee Safety Climate Survey

    Individual and Team Safety Assessment

    Safety Coaching (Supervisor and Employee)

    Benefits:

    Holistic approach to Safety Management Focuses on the people, not necessarily the systems Actionable results focused on individual accountability

    Driving Your Safety Strategy

    5

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    6/31

    The Safety Climate Survey identifies critical factors that can beused to improve the workplace safety climate.

    Based on unsafe work behavior research since the 1970sEmployees use a safety awareness index to rate the safety climateMeasures overall safety attitudesCustomized according to client demographics

    Report provides benchmark scoresIdentifies key concernsConcludes with specific recommendationsCan be conducted online or with pen and paper

    Safety Climate Survey

    6

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    7/31

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    8/31

    Safety Awareness Index

    8

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    9/31

    Key Priorities

    9

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    10/31

    Written Comments

    10

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    11/31

    Safety Climate Awareness Index includes:

    Safety Climate Awareness Index

    Management Safety Attitudes

    Supervisor Safety Attitudes

    Company Safety Attitudes

    Co-Worker Safety

    Equipment and Training

    Compliance versus Commitment

    Measurement

    Culture

    Myself

    Company Engagement

    11

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    12/3112

    Critical components for improving workplace safety Culture of worker engagement

    Worker personality Organizational leadership

    The SafeSystem Assessment Examines individual participant scores against the six safety-related

    personality competencies Useful for screening job applicants based on safety-related behavior Useful for developing employees in existing workforce by identifying safe

    tendencies Provides necessary feedback to build and maintain a culture of safe work

    practices

    Individual Safety Assessment

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    13/31

    Six Dimensions:

    Each contributes to a differentaspect of an employeespotential

    Each reported on a 5-rangenormative scale

    Each predicts different typesof behaviors influencingsafety performance

    Compliant

    Cheerful

    Vigilant

    Cautious

    Trainable

    BEST SAFETY PRACTICES

    Strong

    Safety Competency Model

    13

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    14/31

    Scale: Defiant Compliant

    Low scorers defy authority and may ignorecompany rules.

    High scorers tend to follow rules andguidelines.

    Case Study: Chernobyl

    On April 26, 1986, the world witnessed thecostliest accident in history. The death tollattributed to Chernobyl, including peoplewho died from cancer years later, isestimated at 125,000.

    The total costs including cleanup,resettlement, and compensation to victimshas been estimated at $200 billion.

    The accident was officially attributed topower plant operators who violated plantprocedures and were ignorant of safetyrequirements.

    Case Study: Following Procedure

    14

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    15/31

    Scale: Panicky Strong

    Low scorers may panic under pressure.

    High scorers tend to be sure of theirdecisions.

    Case Study: Buffalo Plane Crash

    On February 13, 2009, a Continental Airlinescommuter plane crashed into a house inBuffalo, New York, killing everyone aboardand one person on the ground.

    The aircrafts black box recorded strictly-prohibited irrelevant chatter between thepilots.

    In-flight recorders also proved that the headpilot panicked and pulled the nose of theaircraft up, causing it to stall and crash.

    Case Study: Handling Stress

    15

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    16/31

    Scale: Irritable Cheerful

    Low scorers may easily lose their temper.

    High scorers tend to remain calm, even instressful situations.

    Case Study: Hudson River Crash

    On January 15th, 2009 US Airlines flight 1549crash-landed in the Hudson River. All 155passengers and crew survived.

    The pilot, Chesley B. Sullenberger, wasdescribed as calm, cool and collected as hemaneuvered the plane into a safe position forwater landing.

    Due to Sullenbergers focus and composure,a tragic accident was averted.

    Case Study: Emotional Control

    16

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    17/31

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    18/31

    Scale: Reckless Cautious

    Low scorers are prone to taking unnecessaryrisks.

    High scorers tend to evaluate options beforemaking risky decisions.

    Case Study: Exxon Valdez

    On March 24, 1989, the Exxon Valdez strucka reef off the Alaskan coast, spilling 10.8million gallons of oil into Prince WilliamSound.

    Captain Joseph Hazelwood had left thecontrols, and was suspected of beingintoxicated at the time of the collision.

    The environmental impact was one of thegreatest in history, and the resulting cleanupeffort cost Exxon $2.5 billion.

    Case Study: Unnecessary Risk

    18

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    19/31

    Scale: Arrogant Trainable

    Low scorers overestimate their owncompetence and as a result may be difficult totrain.

    High scorers tend to be willing to listen toadvice and take advantage of opportunities tolearn more.

    Case Study: New York Crane Collapse

    On March 15th, 2008 a large crane collapsedin Manhattan, killing seven people andhospitalizing several others in critical condition.

    New York Citys Department of Buildingsblamed faulty rigging for the failure.

    The contractors in charge of the crane usedfour nylon slings to secure an 11,000 poundcrane support, when eight steel chain bracesshould have been used.

    Case Study: Training and Development

    19

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    20/3120

    The Hogan Safety Report is a versatile report used to helporganizations screen applicants and develop the employees

    in their existing workforce.

    About the Safety Report

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    21/3121

    Using the Safety Report

    Selection Screening out applicants who are at higher risk of

    engaging in unsafe behaviors Screening in applicants who are most likely to

    display safety-related work behaviors

    Development/Training Training and needs analysis of current workforce Integrated with online and live training

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    22/31

    Section 1: Safety-Related Behavior

    Section 2: Overall Safety Score

    Section 3: Development Areas By Safety Components optional

    Section 4: General Employment-Related Behavior optional

    22

    About the Safety Report

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    23/3123

    The Safety Report

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    24/3124

    Report Layout

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    25/31

    25

    Provides feedbackregarding six safety-related competencies

    Report Layout

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    26/31

    26

    Safety-relatedstrengths and

    development needs

    Report Layout

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    27/31

    27

    Report Layout

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    28/31

    SafeSystem Coaching Process

    The SafeSystem Coaching Process reinforces the importance of individual and collective impact on building a safer environment.

    Delivers full, interactive explanation of the Hogan Safety Report

    Provides straightforward safety coaching that employees andsupervisors use to develop individual action plans

    Includes tools to maintain and improve safety-related behavior in theworkplace.

    28

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    29/31

    Coaching for Individuals: Access to on-line coaching course designed to maximize comprehension of personal results Provides industry-specific examples and illustrations of common risks and behaviors associated with

    individual scores Includes Safety Performance Improvement Plan to outline an individuals safety-related targets for personal

    development

    Coaching for Supervisors: Focuses on the use of the SafeSystem assessment data within the normal course of daily supervision and

    coaching

    Provides detailed process information and worksheets to use in meetings between the supervisor andindividual team members. Development of Safety Performance Improvement Plans, based on feedback and completion of the on-line

    training course

    SafeSystem Coaching Process

    29

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    30/31

    SafeSystem

    When we are busy, we often overlook the importance of fundamentals.Safety is fundamental to an organizations reputation and profitability, and safety starts with the employees.

    Hogans SafeSystem model provides the tools necessary to build and maintain a culture of safe working practices.

    30

  • 8/8/2019 news_558490

    31/31

    2010 Hogan Assessment Systems Inc. Case study photos provided by AP Images. All other photography courtesy of stock.xchng andiStockphoto. Used with permission. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission from

    h i h S f S i i d d k f H A S