NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT 29J BOARD OF DIRECTORS … · 2015. 7. 24. · NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT 29J...

NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT 29J BOARD OF DIRECTORS

February 11, 2014

Regular Meeting 7:00pm

Newberg School District 29J

714 East Sixth Street Newberg, Oregon 97132

NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT 29J Regular Meeting, February 11, 2014 7:00 p.m.

Newberg School District Board Room

NOTE: The Board encourages the attendance of citizens at its meetings. When a patron wishes to bring a particular matter to the attention of the Board, it is recommended that the matter first be discussed with the District Superintendent. The Superintendent will gather relevant information to assist the Board in addressing the issue.

A G E N D A

I. CALL TO ORDER II. FLAG SALUTE III. REVIEW AGENDA IV. COMMENTS/QUESTIONS FROM PATRONS

V. STUDENT/STAFF RECOGNITION A. Joan Austin Elementary School ......................................................... Terry McElligott, Principal

VI. CONSENT AGENDA

A. Minutes B. Personnel C. Donations D. Surplus

VII. COMMUNICATIONS, CORRESPONDENCE, INTRODUCTIONS A. Board Comments ............................................................................................ Board of Directors B. Superintendent Comments ....................................... Dr. Kym LeBlanc-Esparza, Superintendent C. Student Representative Comments .................................... Student Representatives to the Board VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. School Improvement Plan Presentation- CVMS .................................. Dr. Jon Franco, Principal B. Middle School Schedule .......................................................... Dr. LeBlanc-Esparza/ Dr. Franco C. Graduation Rate Report ...................................... Don Staples, Director of Data and Assessment D. Open Enrollment-Action ........................................................ Mikaela Schamp, Board Secretary E. Policy BFD- Board Policy Implementation, Revised, First Reading .............. Policy Committee IX. ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ......................................................................... Board Members X. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Board will meet in executive session under ORS 192.660 (i) To review and evaluate the chief

executive office of any public body, a public officer, employee, or staff member who does not request an open hearing.

XI. ADJOURNMENT

The next regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Newberg School District is scheduled for February 25, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Newberg District Office, 714 East Sixth St., Newberg

1

NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT 29J AGENDA – February 11, 2014

Item: Joan Austin Elementary School Recognition Information Originator: Mikaela Schamp, Board Secretary Presenter: Terry McElligott, Principal Background: In 2013-14 each school will bring forward a student/group or staff member(s) to be recognized for growth, accomplishments or in other notable areas. The “5 C’s of 21st Century Learning” will be highlighted; these areas are Collaboration, Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication and Citizenship. Ms. McElligott will bring first grade students to share with the Board about their writing. Information

2


Item: Consent Agenda Action Originator: Mikaela Schamp, Board Secretary Topic Summary: Adopt consent agenda as presented Background: A. Minutes Approve the minutes from the January 28, 2014 Regular meeting. B. Personnel

Accept Licensed Retirement Efective March 28, 2014: Debbie Taylor-Cassel – Grade 2 Teacher at Edwards Elementary School Accept Licensed Retirement Efective June 30, 2014: Kelsey Foster – Kindergarten Teacher at Edwards Elementary School

C. Donations In Kind Donation: 1 Redcat Media All-in-One System, (estimated $1400.00) from Lightspeed

Technologies Inc, on behalf of Rhonda Allen to NHS $1,500.00 from Newberg Rotary Foundation for NHS Robotics $260.00 from Wilson Orthodontics for Green School-NHS $500.00 from Newberg Mail Room, Inc. for NHS Girls Basketball D. Surplus Declare surplus as identified by District staff.

Recommendation: Move that the Newberg School District Board of Directors approve the consent agenda as presented.

3

NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT 29J Regular Meeting, January 28, 2014 7:00 p.m.

Newberg School District Board Room

MINUTES

I. CALL TO ORDER

A duly called and noticed Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of Newberg School District 29J was called to order by Chair Thomas at 7:02 p.m. on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 in the Newberg School District Board Room.

II. FLAG SALUTE The flag salute was led by Olivia Pugsley. III. REVIEW AGENDA IV. COMMENTS/QUESTIONS FROM PATRONS

A patron provided comments in writing to the Board regarding her concerns about cell phone use in schools.

V. STUDENT/STAFF RECOGNITION A. NHS- Green School Ms. Pugsley presented and explained the nomination process with 21st century skills. Students

Tatiania Lessaos, Travis Cox, Brandon Boothby, Susana Sanchez-Hernandez were recognized for their achievements in growth and learning in humanities, literature and 21st century skills.

VI. COMMUNICATIONS, CORRESPONDENCE, INTRODUCTIONS A. Board Comments: None B. Superintendent Comments: Upcoming legislation snapshots; economic forecast; OEIB

Board seeking current sitting board member to add to Board; HVAC update; thank you to Board members for their service.

Chair Thomas asked for an estimated date on HVAC contract review. Mr. Parker and Dr.

LeBlanc-Esparza discussed the process and the potential for contract conclusion.

BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Todd Thomas, Chair Ron Mock Polly Peterson Mitsi Vondrachek Melinda Van Bossuyt Jim Chogyoji Debbie Hawblizel

STAFF PRESENT Dr. Kym LeBlanc-Esparza, Superintendent Dave Parker, Assistant Superintendent Claudia Stewart, Communications Coordinator Mikaela Schamp, Executive Assistant Gwen Gardner, Interim CFO Candace Pelt, Director of Special Programs STUDENT REPRESENATIVES Olivia Pugsley

4

C. Student Representative Comments: Olivia Pugsley reported that StudentVue is coming back online for more students. Students have had to advocate for themselves with that system down and it is a good exercise.

VII. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION 65: Move that the Newberg School District Board of Directors approve the consent agenda as

presented Moved: Director Chogyoji; Second: Vice Chair Peterson Motion passed 7-0 Chair Thomas recognized donations and thanked donors. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. School Improvement Plan Presentation- Yellow School Principal Stafford Boyd presented. He provided a handout of Yellow School’s mission and

essential questions and briefly discussed the development and analysis that went into the School Improvement Plan.

The Board and student representative asked questions about standards based grading in regular

and AP classes, an explanation of standards based grading, and where AP courses are offered (small school vs. all school), and the trend toward fewer Latino students accessing AP classes now that they are not based in Yellow School. Mr. Boyd discussed standards based as focused on levels of performance (example: proficient, mastery), resource decisions, and discussed the focus on increasing the number of Latino students accessing AP classes.

B. School Improvement Plan Presentation- Blue School Principal Dan Malone presented. He discussed process the development of the School

improvement plan and highlighted supporting male students and 12th grade written post-graduation plans.

Director Mock noted a drop over three years of data in male students and asked what accounted

for this drop and shared his concern about the drop, as well as asking if there is a trend nation-wide in this drop. Mr. Malone stated that a cohort of students that came from middle schools were a challenging cohort, and that there has been a focus on finding different ways of engaging males (example: diverse reading materials, etc.) Staff shared insight with regard to cut scores as well as the more recent strategies, like push-in support.

C. Accept 2012-13 Financial Audit CFO Gwen Gardner and Tara Kemp, of Pauly Rogers and Co., presented. Gwen introduced Ms.

Kemp, who has worked with Newberg School District for several years. Tara reviewed the purpose of audit and results shared with the Letter to the Governing Board (provided to Board prior to meeting.)

Ms. Kemp shared the following:

Three audits occurred: o Financial Statement Audit- assess financial statements and express a statement on them o Compliance Audit- assess compliance with statutes o Compliance on Federal Grants Audit- assess compliance with federal grants

5

Overall results are excellent Financial statement- unmodified, clean opinion Compliance- No issues or non-compliance Federal Grant Compliance- no issues or non-compliance No management letter, no difficulties or disagreements with audit process, issues that warrant

a change with financial statements Other items of note: new accounting standards coming out (including GASB 68); best

practices suggestions and comments (not specific to Newberg) include fidelity insurance review & segregation of duties

Director Van Bossuyt asked if student fund accounts had been audited. Ms. Kemp replied that a

few schools were chosen and issued a separate report with some recommendations to the Business Office. The Board asked for that report to be forwarded to them; Ms. Gardner will do so.

MOTION 66: Move that the Newberg School District Board of Directors accept the Audit Report for the

fiscal year ending June 30, 2013 as submitted. Moved: Director Van Bossuyt; Second: Director Hawblitzel Motion passed 7-0 Director Van Bossuyt asked if student body accounts will be audited annually. Dr. LeBlanc-

Esparza and Ms. Gardner concurred that it should be done annually and the staff will plan for that. Chair Thomas asked about the remaining time Pauly Rogers and Co., P.C. is contracted. Ms.

Gardner noted that this is the second year of the current contract. Director Van Bossuyt noted that she believes an RFP will be needed after this next year’s audit.

D. Board Recognition Proclamation Dr. LeBlanc-Esparza read Governors Proclamation as follows:

WHEREAS: Oregonians rely on public education to ensure a prosperous quality of life and strong economic health for Oregon; and WHEREAS: Locally elected boards fulfill leadership roles and serve as the conduit through which teachers, parents, businesses and communities demonstrate the care, creativity and support that lead to student achievement; and WHEREAS: Public schools nurture and train diverse student populations to the best of their ability, whatever the resources, to give students the knowledge, skills and opportunities they need to succeed; and WHEREAS: Board members build the framework that makes it possible for education organizations to teach Oregon's children; and WHEREAS: The committed men and women who serve on the boards of Oregon's 197 school districts, 19 education service districts and 17 community colleges deserve recognition and thanks for their dedication to the education needs of the people of Oregon. NOW, THEREFORE: I, John A. Kitzhaber, M.D., Governor of the State of Oregon, hereby proclaim January 2014 to be SCHOOL BOARD RECOGNITION MONTH in Oregon and encourage all Oregonians to join in this observance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the State of Oregon to be affixed. Done at the Capitol in the City of Salem in the State of Oregon on this day, November 15, 2013.

John A. Kitzhaber, M.D., Governor; Kate Brown, Secretary of State

6

Kym shared cards from schools and pieces of artwork from students and District office staff. IX. ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDA

Work Session Proposal- Strategic Plan Middle School Schedule Executive and Open Session- Superintendent Plan Budget Committee Meetings

X. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Board entered into executive session under ORS 192.660 (i) To review and evaluate the chief

executive officer of any public body, a public officer, employee, or staff member who does not request an open hearing at 8:32 and stated media announcement.

The Board took a short recess from 8:33 to 8:40pm. The Board returned to regular session at

10:23 pm. XI. ADJOURNMENT

No further matters appearing to come before the Board, Chair Thomas adjourned the meeting at 10:23 pm.

Recorded by: Mikaela Schamp ATTEST: APPROVED: Superintendent-Clerk Board Chair

7

1

Tag number Serial number Model5874 5X7S511 dell gx1507452 578RZD1 dell 7405901 J9WX511 dell gx1505912 D4MT211 dell gx1508217 BJMXS01 dell gx1506979 JMNCT01 dell gx1505343 HFSPF31 dell gx2705913 DJ1S511 dell gx1506957 4FXJ601 dell gx1506955 1R16701 dell gx1506956 8S40701 dell gx1506959 4N16701 dell gx1505868 74Z5811 dell gx1505896 HVS5811 dell gx1509040 6lt6871 dell gx2807058 GY8G671770F Epson Powerlite 82cno tag 3J27kt8zm26h compaq evo N610cno tag 3j19kbszhdc4 compaq evo N600cno tag 7e2bkt8z4255 compaq evo N610c8126 no s# compaq evo N600cno tag 7e36kt8zy06b compaq evo N610cno tag 7E35KT8ZA0LS compaq evo N610cno tag 7E36KT8ZS0MA compaq evo N610cno tag CNU335029W compaq evo N620cno tag 7e35kt8za095 compaq evo N610cno tag CNU34702D4 compaq evo N620c8145 FFFHH81 dell gx2808195 3bydy71 dell gx2809012 2UB60501DQ compaq dc76009013 USW34208GT compaq d5308664 ba618384678 generic pc

8416 330M031 dell dimension 83007492 981T811 dell gx2406889 DM3QK11 dell gx2406864 85NWQ11 dell gx2406400 6Y6VX11 dell gx2407238 55KFK11 dell gx2407145 CCK1K11 dell gx2406297 JTG4511 dell gx2407168 10KFK11 dell gx2406866 330KD11 dell gx2406298 6WG4511 dell gx2406293 6VG4511 dell gx2408705 DVD9RC1 dell 7459022 CNU4130PRT compaq nc80009016 CNU505FQ62 compaq nc80009018 CNU449FF59 compaq nc80007198 CN4651UZKY HP Pavilion s77007835 2UB33605GY HP compaq d530s

8364 CNDRB46522 HP Laserjet 2200dn6654 CNV52602JF HP Compaq t51256631 CNV52602MP HP Compaq t5125

8

2

6636 CNV52602JJ HP Compaq t51256663 no s# macbook6021 7VV1Z71 dell d6106625 FH6PBB1 dell d8208884 J421P71 dell d8106113 DBCX211 dell gx150no tag UV43007CR71 ibook g47134 1JF3P31 dell gx2707133 8V8CG31 dell gx2708830 MXD34407ZG hp compaq6130 7JGLD11 dell gx1506658 CNV52602MV hp compaq t51256659 CNV52602HP hp compaq t51256643 CNV53106JN hp compaq t51256647 CNV52602JV hp compaq t51256898 CNV524000L hp compaq t51256645 CNV52602KY hp compaq t51256657 CNV52602K3 hp compaq t51256635 CNV53106KG hp compaq t51256655 CNV52602JQ hp compaq t51256895 CNV524002F hp compaq t51256640 CNV52602MM hp compaq t51256656 CNV52602KX hp compaq t51256644 CNV52602HM hp compaq t51256634 CNV52602LY hp compaq t51256896 CNV5240036 hp compaq t51256641 CNV53106JG hp compaq t51256637 CNV52602JH hp compaq t51256633 CNV52602HX hp compaq t51256642 CNV52602KW hp compaq t51256651 CNV551023C hp compaq t51256897 CNV524001X hp compaq t51259035 466789-73277 generic pc8831 ed007807 generic pc9034 no s# generic pc8829 no s# generic pc7129 9YCWL31 dell gx2706660 CNV52602J4 hp compaq t51256649 CNV52602HR hp compaq t51256650 CNV52602N7 hp compaq t51256638 CNV53106HL hp compaq t51256840 FCG1121 dell gx2404489 UV1241R8LCCK ibook g44487 UV12430QLCC ibook g44571 UV12524FLCD ibook g44500 UV124226LCC. ibook g44494 UV1242GTLCCV ibook g44499 UV12427CLCC5 ibook g44498 UV1244L3LCCC ibook g44570 UV1242Y3LCC ibook g44492 UV1242AHLCCD ibook g44490 UV12423WLCCL ibook g44496 UV1242A5LCC1 ibook g48633 ?? ibook g45813 *3K5084CZRJQB ibook g4

9

3

6246 *3K5383NPT77A ibook g48636 *3K5383PHT77A ibook g46248 *3K53950VT77A ibook g46247 *3K5030AURJLB ibook g45812 *3K82106YT73B ibook g45811 6C639M6BS9WD ibook g46252 ?? ibook g46242 *3K5383NRT77A ibook g45807 *3K81917TT73B ibook g45810 *3K7220T1T73B ibook g46245 *3K5383K5T77A ibook g46236 *3K53950RT77A ibook g48637 ?? ibook g45808 ?? ibook g45814 *3K7174H0T73B ibook g46254 *3K5385XVT77A ibook g46235 *3K53950YT77A ibook g48640 *3K5383DVT77A ibook g46243 *3K5383WGT77A ibook g48642 *3K5300QJT77A ibook g46237 *3K53951LT77A ibook g48631 ?? ibook g46233 *3K5393LJT77A ibook g46241 *3K53950ST77A ibook g46244 *3K53950PT77A ibook g46255 LW5384AVQRYC ibook g46250 *3K53950WT77A ibook g45806 *3K5090SURJQB ibook g48638 LW5384Q5QRYC ibook g45308 UV325006PET ibook g45301 UV3250RPPET ibook g45299 UV3250SYPET ibook g45318 UV3250HKPET ibook g45319 UV3250GLPET ibook g4?? UV3250G3PET ibook g4

5300 UV3250H2PET ibook g45313 UV3244ULPET ibook g4?? UV3250GXPET ibook g4

6351 ?? ibook g45323 UV3250D0PET ibook g48634 *3K5367NYT77A ibook g45317 UV3244UDPET ibook g4?? 4H6052TESE7 ibook g4

5322 UV3250CEPET ibook g45303 UV32500QPET ibook g46350 4H60529USE7 ibook g45310 UV3250CUPET ibook g45320 UV3250SGPET ibook g45302 UV32501EPET ibook g45306 UV3250RJPET ibook g4?? UV325007PET ibook g4

6347 4H60524WSE7 ibook g44491 UV1242FHLCCI ibook g44493 UV1242C6LCC4 ibook g45621 UV43459AR12 ibook g4

10

4

5635 UV43450NR12 ibook g45652 UV43456SR12 ibook g45651 UV4344KRR12 ibook g45648 UV43455YR12 ibook g45656 UV4344GER12 ibook g45649 UV434580R12 ibook g45650 UV434592R12 ibook g45631 UV43505RR12 ibook g45620 UV434545R12 ibook g45655 UV4344SVR12 ibook g45632 UV434518R12 ibook g45645 UV435078R12 ibook g45637 UV43456QR12 ibook g45646 UV434533R12 ibook g45619 UV4344G3R12 ibook g45647 UV4344Y1R12 ibook g45638 UV43501FR12 ibook g45654 UV43454FR12 ibook g45634 UV4344ZPR12 ibook g45643 UV43503AR12 ibook g45642 UV43502JR12 ibook g45640 UV4344ZVR12 ibook g45653 UV43501DR12 ibook g45279 UV3252YYPET ibook g45437 UV41902DQHW ibook g45295 UV3252ZVPET ibook g45286 UV3253MQPET ibook g45284 UV3253H3PET ibook g45274 UV3253LJPET ibook g45281 UV3252HCPET ibook g45445 UV41902SQHW ibook g45290 UV32536YPET ibook g45441 UV41905KR12 ibook g45293 UV3252RTPET ibook g45277 UV32530CPET ibook g45271 UV32529BPET ibook g45282 UV32536UPET ibook g45276 UV32537CPET ibook g45294 UV3252JBPET ibook g45288 UV3253B5PET ibook g45444 UV419020R12 ibook g45749 UV44802ZRER ibook g45752 UV44803VRER ibook g45467 UV4208TEQJQ ibook g4?? UV4216K9R12 ibook g4

5518 UV4216G8R12 ibook g45466 UV4210B6QJQ ibook g45520 UV4219HWR12 ibook g45753 UV44800MRER ibook g45750 UV44802CRER ibook g45758 UV44800ERER ibook g45465 UV42107EQJQ ibook g45514 UV4213FYR12 ibook g45511 UV4213K7R12 ibook g46342 4H601783SE7 ibook g4

11

5

5751 UV44800SRER ibook g45760 UV44803KRER ibook g45508 UV4213G6R12 ibook g45762 UV448032RER ibook g45463 UV4210BHQJQ ibook g46455 4H6182FDSE7 ibook g45754 UV44800QRER ibook g45755 UV44801HRER ibook g45515 UV4213FRR12 ibook g46344 4H601744SE7 ibook g45763 UV448028RER ibook g45464 UV4210KRQJQ ibook g45504 UV4213KBR12 ibook g46343 4H601766SE7 ibook g46491 4H61513PSE7 ibook g46492 4H61909HSE9 ibook g45296 ZZ3251SDPEPA powrebook8621 DKP1T51 D8003871 12205470 Polycom5759 UV44801URER ibook g45756 UV44801ERER ibook g45434 UV41901SR12 ibook g47191 FV9j911 dell gx2401739 EE6030UC36N Powerbook 1505196 UV3080CPN5B ibook g45436 UV41902PQHW ibook g45431 UV41902HQHW ibook g410635 8JCWN71 dell gx2805332 3TYYF31 dell gx2706022 HHTJY71 dell gx2808222 JG7QQ51 dell gx2807037 gy8g671800f Epson Projector5090 UV23819GLQ2 ibook g45089 UV23819ALQ2 ibook g45099 Dell Lattittude5525 6PVK051 Dell sx27010621 FGCWN71 GX28010616 JCCWN71 GX28010727 5JCWN71 GX28010631 307FP71 GX28010748 BJ6K581 GX2805037 gn8cs11 gx2608144 3WQP671 dell gx280no tag BJ6K581 dell gx28010705 1CCWN71 dell gx28010704 BL6K581 dell gx280no tag 307FP71 dell gx280no tag 5JCWN71 dell gx280no tag JCCWN71 dell gx280no tag FGCWN71 dell gx2808053 8RHPT71 dell d8108071 2CFFY71 dell d8108082 B6C04B1 dell d8108606 FTP72B1 dell d8108068 CD8NS71 dell d810

12

6

8072 8KYY3B1 dell d8108608 FDKVP91 dell d8108060 1R0BV71 dell d8108077 4BD14B1 dell d8108079 8X59B81 dell d8108055 H6D2091 dell d8108073 97M8W71 dell d8104900 2VMYB01 dell c6008151 no s# hdnw2272 125918 precision7481 W301KN9ZA352 hp compaqno tag 8JCWN71 dell gx2804767 52GWS01 dell gx1504771 H2GWS01 dell gx1504411 T1470055 tangent9923 7D5RL81 dell gx5208087 USW43703XG hp compaqno tag FCG1121 dell gx240no tag JG7QQ51 dell gx2807423 9WVXH11 dell gx2407467 FJL4Q11 dell gx2407154 8P5H711 dell gx2406380 J1SZS11 dell gx2606022 HHTJY71 dell gx2807191 FV9J911 dell gx2405332 3TYYF31 dell gx2707434 68J6V11 dell gx2405051 6V3VT11 dell gx1507601 USW4370416 hp compaq5384 7XLHV31 dell 4605692 6847BW43H495 compaq deskpro4163 6NGV20B dell gx110

40 monitorsEND OF Entries

13


Item: Chehalem Valley Middle School School Improvement Plan Information Originator: Dr. Jon Franco, Principal, and CVMS Site Council Presenter: Dr. Jon Franco, Principal Background: Dr. Franco will present the CMVS School Improvement Plan (SIP). INFORMATION

14

Newberg Public Schools

School Performance & Improvement Plan

2013-2014

School: Chehalem Valley Middle School

Revised June 2013

SCHOOL GOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2013-2014

15

2

OEIB Achievement Compact Newberg School District Board Approved Goals for 2013-14 2020 Targets are our vision for the future

All Disadv* Econ Dis

LEP Disab Hisp Black AI/ AN

PI Asian TAG

Kindergarten Assessment Participation (new for 2013-14)

Fall 2013 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97%

Spring 2014 83% 77% 79% 70% 58% 71% 71% 71% 71% 71% > 95% Grade 3 Students Meeting/Exceeding on State Reading Test 2020 90% 87% 88% 83% 74% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% > 95%

Spring 2014 78% 65% 65% 61% 47% 66% 63% 63% 63% 63% > 95% Grade 5 Students Meeting/Exceeding on State Math Test 2020 90% 83% 82% 81% 74% 84% 82% 82% 82% 82% > 95%

Spring 2014 91% 89% 88% 91% 88% 92% 90% 90% 90% 90% > 95% Grade 6 Students Not Chronically Absent 2020 96% 95% 94% 96% 94% 96% > 95% > 95% > 95% > 95% > 95%

Spring 2014 78% 64% 66% 45% 34% 61% 53% 53% 53% 53% > 95% Grade 8 Students Meeting/Exceeding on State Math Test 2020 90% 83% 84% 73% 67% 82% 78% 78% 78% 78% > 95%

Spring 2014 93% 89% 87% 87% 90% 91% 89% 89% 89% 89% > 95% Grade 9 Students Not Chronically Absent 2020 95% 93% 92% 94% 93% 94% 93% 93% 93% 93% > 95%

Spring 2014 87% 78% 78% 62% 87% 75% 77% 77% 77% 77% 88% Grade 9 Students Earning 6 or More Credits 2020 92% 88% 87% 80% 92% 86% 87% 87% 87% 87% 93%

Class of '14 80% 68% 68% 60% 60% 66% 63% 63% 63% 82% > 95% Students Graduating in 4 Years with a Regular Diploma Class of '20 90% 84% 84% 73% 78% 83% 81% 81% 81% 92% > 95%

Class of '13 90% 79% 83% 78% 78% 83% 81% 81% 81% 81% > 95% Students Completing High School in 5 Years with any Diploma or GED Class of '19 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98%

Class of '13 63% 52% 53% 20% 58% 53% 53% 53% 53% 53% 71% Students Enrolled in Post-Secondary Education within 16 months after HS Class of '19 80% 76% 75% 51% 71% 72% 72% 72% 72% 72% 88%

Class of '14 32% 23% 24% 15% 19% 24% 22% 22% 22% 22% 59% Students earning 9 or More College Credits while in High School Class of '20 80% 76% 75% 69% 73% 78% 74% 74% 74% 74% 85%

*Disadv is Students in one or more subgroup other than Asian or TAG (unduplicated student count)

16

3

Attendance Rate Data: (% of students with 90% or better Attendance as calculated per the Achievement Compact – based on Full Academic Year Flag of Y). *Achievement Data (ODE)

Grade 11-12 12-13 13-14 Goals 6 87.9% 89.6% 90% 7 89.3% 86.7% 90% 8 87.5% 88.0% 90%

Attendance Goal: 6th grade-90% 7th grade-90% 8th grade-90%

Attainment Plan: -CARE Team -Attendance Team -SARB process -Behavior interventions (Social Responsibility Training, Quest, Catalyst) -PBIS (Attendance is part of our incentive criteria)

2012-2013 Safe School Goals: Results from 2012-2013: 88% of our students were in the GREEN ZONE (0-1 major referrals) 2013-2014 Safe School Goal: 90% of our students will be in the GREEN ZONE (0-1 major referrals)

17

4

Attainment Plan: -PBIS lessons and incentives -CARE Team -SRT -Catalyst -Attendance team -PLCs -Quest -After school HW club

18

5

District Goal: All students on grade level in Reading Indicate Data Source:

Grade 10-11 Results

11-12 Results

12-13 RESULTS

13-14 Goal

13-14 RESULTS

14-15 Goal

14-15 RESULTS

6 80

7 84

8 85

% of Students Proficient & Advanced on Reading OAKS

Data Source: ODE State Report Card - Represents students counted at the building level for AYP – Reading Cut Score changed in 2011-2012 school year. Bold – Subgroups identified on the Achievement Compact. *Reading Cut Scores changed in 2011-2012

2010-2011 2011-2012* 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015

Sch NSD Sch NSD Sch NSD Goal Results Goal Results

6th Grade 86.2% 84.5% 75.5% 76.3% 75.6% 75.1% 80%

Male 79.4% 81.3% 72.7% 74.7% 77.2% 73.0% 80%

Female 93.8% 87.5% 78.2% 77.9% 73.9% 77.1% 80%

AmInd/AlkN 100.0% 100.0% 66.7% 75.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100%

Asian 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 62.5% 80.0% 85.7% 85%

African/Am 66.7% 77.8% 50.0% 50.0% 66.7% 83.3% 70%

Hispanic 71.0% 69.3% 50.0% 58.2% 52.8% 56.2% 60%

White 88.9% 88.4% 82.7% 82.4% 82.0% 79.3% 85%

LEP 44.4% 42.9% 31.6% 37.2% 27.8% 25.0% 40%

SPED 58.6% 55.2% 26.2% 35.3% 30.8% 35.1% 40%

Econ Disad 81.0% 76.2% 62.5% 63.3% 56.5% 59.6% 65%

Migrant 75.0% 71.4% 80.0% 55.6% 33.3% 33.3% 50%

TAG 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100%

19

6

% of Students Proficient & Advanced on Reading OAKS - continued

Data Source: ODE State Report Card - Represents students counted at the building level for AYP – Reading Cut Score changed in 2011-2012 school year. Bold – Subgroups identified on the Achievement Compact. *Reading Cut Scores changed in 2011-2012

2010-2011 2011-2012* 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015


7th Grade 87.3% 87.1% 86.7% 83.0% 82.4% 81.4% 8 4%

Male 84.3% 84.8% 85.4% 83.2% 82.4% 82.4% 84%

Female 90.0% 89.6% 88.0% 82.8% 82.5% 80.4% 84%

AmInd/AlkN 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100%

Asian 100.0% 85.7% 100.0% 75.0% 66.7% 70.0% 85%

African/Am 100.0% 80.0% 33.3% 44.4% 66.7% 66.7% 75%

Hispanic 76.7% 75.3% 83.3% 73.3% 63.9% 68.4% 75%

White 88.8% 90.5% 88.4% 87.2% 87.5% 86.4% 90%

LEP 60.0% 57.9% 60.0% 32.1% 35.3% 33.3% 45%

SPED 54.5% 53.3% 51.9% 43.3% 41.9% 47.5% 50%

Econ Disad 79.8% 77.1% 78.9% 70.8% 68.2% 68.0% 77%

Migrant 50.0% 61.5% 100.0% 66.7% 80.0% 66.7% 84%

TAG 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100%

2010-2011 2011-2012* 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015


8th Grade 79.8% 83.5% 73.4% 77.7% 76.0% 76.0% 85%

Male 76.7% 80.0% 70.0% 74.5% 76.6% 77.4% 85%

Female 83.0% 87.4% 76.7% 81.3% 75.3% 74.6% 85%

AmInd/AlkN 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 75%

Asian 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% 62.5% 50.0% 60.0% 85%

African/Am 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 57.1% 75.0% 66.7% 85%

Hispanic 50.0% 69.1% 51.7% 64.3% 62.1% 61.4% 71%

White 83.5% 86.0% 77.0% 81.9% 78.2% 79.8% 85%

LEP 36.4% 53.6% 50.0% 46.4% 0.0% 6.3% 50%

SPED 40.0% 42.9% 28.1% 28.8% 46.9% 40.4% 55%

Econ Disad 60.0% 73.5% 67.5% 70.5% 68.4% 64.1% 75%

Migrant 100.0% 88.9% 25.0% 55.6% 40.0% 50.0% 50%

TAG 96.7% 98.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100%

20

7

Reading Median Growth Percentile by Grade Data Source: Achievement Data (ODE) – Bold – Subgroups used for Report Card ratings

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015

Results Results Goal Results Goal Results

6th Grade 58 60

Male 64.5 65

Female 44 50

Underserved Races/Ethnicities* 45.5 50

White 59 65

LEP 20 50

SPED 18 50

Econ Disad 44 50

TAG 64 65

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015


7th Grade 63.5 65

Male 65 66

Female 63 65

Underserved Races/Ethnicities* 67 68

White 65 66

LEP 58.5 60

SPED 55.5 57

Econ Disad 63 65

TAG 75 77

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015


8th Grade 55.5 58

Male 57 59

Female 52 54


White 55.5 59

LEP 1 50

SPED 57.5 59

Econ Disad 59.5 61

TAG 48 50

*Underserved Races/Ethnicities include: AmInd/Alskn Nat, Hawaiian/Pac Isldr, African Am, Hispanic

21

8

Academic Achievement Gaps: SpEd and LEP are significantly below expectations at all grade levels. 8th grade drops after strong achievement in 7th grade. Academic Growth Gaps: Overall lower growth in 6th grade. 6th grade SpEd and LEP, and 8th grade LEP very low growth

2012-2013 DATA ANALYSIS LIMIT TO 4-6 • SpEd and LEP are significantly below expectations at all grade levels

•8th grade drops after strong achievement in 7th grade

• Overall lower growth in 6th grade •6th grade SpEd and LEP, and 8th grade LEP very low growth

TARGETS FOR THE 2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR LIMIT TO 4-6 •INCREASE LEP AND SPED ACHIEVEMENT BY 5%-15% (SEE SPECIFIC GOAL NUMBERS) •8TH GRADE ACHIEVEMENT AT 85% •ABOVE AVERAGE GROWTH (OVER 50%) FOR SIXTH GRADE AND ALL 6TH GRADE SUBGROUPS •6TH GRADE SPED AND LEP AND 8TH GRADE LEP SHOW 50% GROWTH

22

9

READING IMPROVEMENT PLAN . • may include Professional Development activities; if so, support structures section optional. •

STRATEGIES TIMELINE RESOURCES NEEDED

Professional development time and training will concentrate on PLC groups unwrapping standards, writing learning targets, creating rubrics, common assessments, and talking about instruction that has the most impact on student achievement. PLCs will have a common sequence of standards taught and a common scope by the end of this year. Staff development days will concentrate on literacy strategies across the curriculum. PLCs from both middle schools will meet at least four times this school year Staff meetings will focus on introducing, re-enforcing, and/or improving research based effective teaching practices. Techniques will center upon those that satisfy both the auditory and visual learner. We will revisit SIOP strategies with an emphasis on vocabulary strategies to utilize across the curriculum. Each staff meeting will include a reading strategy.

Mindset book study group with fifteen teachers. We will also utilize Mindset as a foundation for staff conversations during meetings.

Twice per month during Principal late

starts and two full days during the year

At least four times this school year

Monthly on Monday afternoons

Ongoing until complete

At least one hour, twice a month Time At least an hour once a month -Books for book study Books for book study

Identify students in the various subgroups who need extra support and provide them with differentiated instruction. Identify students in different score ranges who could benefit from targeted interventions. -Reading labs for students who need extra support -SpEd support classes that provide a “double dose” -Best first instruction for all students

Identify students in the Spring for the

following year. Adjust throughout the year.

Time and collaboration between regular ed and SpEd teachers and counselors FTE to cover labs

23

10

Increase Community Involvement to assist in student mentoring, tutoring, and after school homework club.

Throughout the year Time to make contacts E-mail and other electronic contacts PTO

Frequent classroom walk-throughs by administrators providing feedback to teachers Monthly common language objective shared with staff

Ongoing

Monthly

Time

Homework Club will be available for all students four days per week. Building literacy team will work with district literacy team with the roll-out of district literacy plan. Teachers will have a common sequence and scope of writing standards taught. Spanish for Spanish speakers class being offered this year to increase literacy within Native language and to assist with academic language experienced in content classes. Staff development on literacy strategies utilized across all content areas.

All year

All year

All year

January and September staff development day

Cost of staff time and bussing Time for meetings. FTE-one section Use of district Reading TOSA

Benchmark Measures

Measure Timeline Goal for Student Progress

OAKS ELPA

Spring See specific goals

Common local assessments Throughout the year Students show proficiency on assessments at the rate of expectations for OAKS

SRI 3 times per year Students show growth throughout the year

Grades Throughout the year Percentages passing reading will match achievement goals

24

11

District Goal: All students on grade level in Writing Indicate Data Source:

Grade 10-11 Results

11-12 Results

12-13 Results

13-14 Goal

13-14 Results

14-15 Goal

14-15 Results

6 75%

7 75%

8 75%

Academic Achievement Gaps: There is no state test for middle school. Writing achievement gaps were taken from district writing assessment. Academic Growth Gaps: Not accessible

25

12

2012-2013 DATA ANALYSIS LIMIT TO 4-6 • 58% of 6th graders met on the district assessment •66% of 7th graders met on the district assessment •55% of 8th graders met on the district assessment •6th and 7th graders scored lowest in conventions 8th graders scored lowest in ideas and content and organization

TARGETS FOR THE 2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR LIMIT TO 4-6 • 75% of 6th, 7th, and 8th graders will meet on the district assessment • • •

26

13

WRITING IMPROVEMENT PLAN • may include Professional Development activities; if so, support structures section optional. •


All content areas will provide writing opportunities. Student subgroups will receive direct writing instruction based on their need.

All year Time

Professional development time and training will concentrate on PLC groups unwrapping standards, writing learning targets, creating rubrics, common assessments, and talking about instruction that has the most impact on student achievement. PLCs will have a common sequence of standards taught and a common scope by the end of this year. Staff development days will concentrate on literacy strategies across the curriculum. PLCs from both middle schools will meet at least four times this school year Staff meetings will focus on introducing, re-enforcing, and/or improving research based effective teaching practices. Techniques will center upon those that satisfy both the auditory and visual learner. We will revisit SIOP strategies with an emphasis on vocabulary strategies to utilize across the curriculum.

Mindset book study group with fifteen teachers. We will also utilize Mindset as a foundation for staff conversations during meetings.

Twice per month during Principal late

starts and two full dayd

At least four times this school year



At least one hour, twice a month Time At least an hour once a month -Books for book study Books for book study At least one hour once per month

Identify students in the various subgroups who need extra support and provide them with differentiated instruction. Identify students in different score ranges who could benefit from targeted interventions. -Reading labs for students who need extra support

Identify students in the Spring for the

following year. Adjust throughout the year.

Time and collaboration between regular ed and SpEd teachers and counselors FTE to cover labs

27

14

-SpEd support classes that provide a “double dose” -Best first instruction for all students

Increase Community Involvement to assist in student mentoring, tutoring, and after school homework club.

Throughout the year Time to make contacts E-mail and other electronic contacts

Homework Club will be available for all students four days per week. Building literacy team will work with district literacy team with the roll-out of district literacy plan. Teachers will have a common sequence and scope of writing standards taught. Spanish for Spanish speakers class being offered this year to increase literacy within Native language and to assist with academic language experienced in content classes. Staff development on literacy strategies utilized across all content areas.

All year

All year

All year


Cost of staff time and bussing Time for meetings. FTE-one section Use of district Reading TOSA

Frequent classroom walk-throughs by administrators providing feedback to teachers on instruction

Ongoing Time

Monthly common language objective shared with staff Monthly Time

Benchmark Measures

Measure Timeline Goal for Student Progress District Writing Assessment Fall, Spring Pre-Assessment, Look for growth Common Timeline of when to give writing prompts-Scoring using common rubrics

Fall, Winter, Spring Pre-Assessment, look for growth

28

15

District Goal: All students on grade level in Math Indicate Data Source:

Grade 10-11 Results

11-12 Results

12-13 Results

13-14 Goal

13-14 Results

14-15 Goal

14-15 Results

6 70%

7 78%

8 78%

% of Students Proficient & Advanced on Math OAKS

Data Source: ODE State Report Card - Represents students counted at the building level for AYP Bold – Subgroups identified on the Achievement Compact

2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015


6rd Grade 64.5% 59.1% 68.5% 69.4% 68.2% 66.0% 70%

Male 62.6% 61.1% 72.7% 69.6% 64.4% 61.9% 70%

Female 66.7% 57.2% 64.4% 69.1% 72.5% 70.1% 70%

AmInd/AlkN 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 50.0% 0.0% 75.0% 50%

Asian 100.0% 80.0% 50.0% 62.5% 80.0% 85.7% 80%

African/Am 0.0% 11.1% 50.0% 50.0% 33.3% 50.0% 50%

Hispanic 45.2% 42.7% 44.1% 53.2% 61.1% 60.3% 65%

White 68.0% 62.8% 75.3% 75.6% 71.0% 67.2% 75%

LEP 11.1% 20.6% 31.6% 41.9% 44.4% 40.6% 50%

SPED 31.0% 20.9% 11.9% 20.3% 34.6% 24.6% 40%

Econ Disad 52.4% 48.6% 53.8% 55.6% 51.5% 47.6% 60%

Migrant 25.0% 35.7% 80.0% 55.6% 33.3% 33.3% 50%

TAG 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100%

29

16

% of Students Proficient & Advanced on Math OAKS - continued

Data Source: ODE State Report Card - Represents students counted at the building level for AYP Bold – Subgroups identified on the Achievement Compact

2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015


7th Grade 67.9% 67.6% 80.5% 74.0% 77.5% 74.3% 78%

Male 68.6% 68.1% 79.6% 75.1% 75.2% 73.8% 78%

Female 67.3% 67.0% 81.5% 72.9% 79.6% 74.9% 78%

AmInd/AlkN 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100%

Asian 100.0% 57.1% 100.0% 75.0% 66.7% 70.0% 78%

African/Am 100.0% 40.0% 66.7% 44.4% 66.7% 66.7% 78%

Hispanic 43.3% 43.8% 70.0% 68.0% 58.3% 63.3% 70%

White 72.2% 74.9% 83.0% 76.4% 82.1% 78.6% 85%

LEP 46.7% 39.5% 40.0% 39.3% 23.5% 33.3% 35%

SPED 27.3% 28.3% 40.7% 31.7% 27.9% 40.3% 40%

Econ Disad 61.9% 54.1% 69.0% 60.7% 61.2% 60.2% 70%

Migrant 83.3% 69.2% 100.0% 75.0% 60.0% 60.0% 65%

TAG 96.3% 98.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100%

2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015


8th Grade 75.4% 70.2% 76.4% 75.3% 76.5% 71.5% 78%

Male 79.6% 73.5% 75.0% 72.9% 78.5% 75.4% 78%

Female 71.0% 66.5% 77.7% 77.8% 74.2% 67.7% 78%

AmInd/AlkN 100.0% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100%

Asian 50.0% 80.0% 33.3% 62.5% 50.0% 60.0% 65%

African/Am 0.0% 25.0% 100.0% 28.6% 50.0% 33.3% 65%

Hispanic 45.5% 56.4% 55.2% 58.6% 75.9% 62.9% 75%

White 79.4% 72.8% 80.7% 81.2% 77.6% 75.0% 85%

LEP 41.7% 37.9% 40.0% 35.7% 0.0% 12.5% 40%

SPED 32.0% 33.3% 31.3% 30.8% 34.4% 31.6% 40%

Econ Disad 49.2% 52.0% 67.5% 64.1% 64.6% 56.5% 70%

Migrant 33.3% 44.4% 37.5% 50.0% 60.0% 58.3% 65%

TAG 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100%

30

17

Math Median Growth Percentile by Grade

Data Source: Achievement Data (ODE) – Bold – Subgroups used for Report Card ratings 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015

6th Grade Results Results Goal Results Goal Results

All 50 55

Male 49.5 55

Female 50 55


White 51 60

LEP 28.5 50

SPED 32 50

Econ Disad 42 50

TAG 60.5 65

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015


All 65 65

Male 59 60

Female 72.5 75


White 61 60

LEP 84 85

SPED 51 50

Econ Disad 70 70

TAG 46.5 50

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015


All 58.5 60

Male 59 60

Female 58 60


White 57.5 58

LEP 3 50

SPED 59.5 60

Econ Disad 60.5 61

TAG 60 60

*Underserved Races/Ethnicities include: AmInd/Alskn Nat, Hawaiian/Pac Isldr, African Am, Hispanic

31

18

Academic Achievement Gaps: 6th grade achievement is lower than expected SpEd achievement is below 35% LEP achievement at 7th and 8th grade are significantly low Academic Growth Gaps: 6th grade growth overall is low LEP and SpEd growth in 6th grade and 8th grade LEP growth are very low

32

19

2012-2013 DATA ANALYSIS LIMIT TO 4-6 • 6th grade achievement is lower than expected • SpEd achievement is below 35% • LEP achievement at 7th and 8th grade are significantly low •6th grade growth overall is low LEP and SpEd growth in 6th grade and 8th grade LEP growth are very low

TARGETS FOR THE 2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR LIMIT TO 4-6 • 6TH GRADE ACHIEVEMENT WILL BE ABOVE 70% • SPED ACHIEVEMENT WILL BE AT 40% OR HIGHER • LEP ACHIEVEMENT WILL BE AT 40% OR HIGHER • 6TH GRADE GROWTH WILL BE AT 55% LEP AND SPED GROWTH WILL BE AT 50% FOR ALL GRADE LEVELS

33

20

MATH IMPROVEMENT PLAN • may include Professional Development activities; if so, support structures section optional.


Professional development time and training will concentrate on PLC groups unwrapping standards, writing learning targets, creating rubrics, common assessments, and talking about instruction that has the most impact on student achievement. PLCs will have a common sequence of standards taught and a common scope by the end of this year. PLC groups from both middle schools will meet at least four times this school year Staff meetings will focus on introducing, re-enforcing, and/or improving research based effective teaching practices. Techniques will center upon those that satisfy both the auditory and visual learner. We will revisit SIOP strategies such as vocabulary strategies that can be utilized across the content areas. No more nuts and bolts.

Identify students in the various subgroups that need extra support and provide them with differentiated instruction. Identify students in different score ranges who could benefit from targeted interventions. -SpEd support classes that provide a “double dose” -Best first instruction for all students -Grade level math labs and SpEd math labs -All English Language Learners will be in grade level math classes with a support class if needed.

Twice per month

Four times this school year

Once per month

Ongoing

Time Time Time for meetings and time to plan Common assessments, progress monitoring, CARE team

Frequent classroom walk-throughs by administrators Mindset Book Study with fifteen teachers. Book will also be used as a foundation for conversations with whole staff

Ongoing

Ongoing until complete

Time Book Mindset Time

Homework Club will be available for all students four days per week.

All year

Cost of staff time and bussing

34

21

Building literacy team will work with district literacy team with the roll-out of district literacy plan. Teachers will have a common sequence and scope of writing standards taught. Spanish for Spanish speakers class being offered this year to increase literacy within Native language and to assist with academic language experienced in content classes. Staff development on literacy strategies utilized across all content areas.

All year

All year


Time for meetings. FTE-one section Use of district Reading TOSA

Benchmark Measures Measure Timeline Goal for Student Progress

OAKS Spring See goals above

Common assessments Throughout year Students will show proficiency at the levels expected for OAKS

Grades Throughout year Grades will match expectations for OAKS achievement

Math Problem Solving Work Sample

Spring Students will proficiency at the levels expected on the problem solving assessment

35

22

Science

% of Students Proficient & Advanced on Science OAKS

Data Source: ODE State Report Card - Represents students counted at the building level for AYP - * Cut Score Changed in 2011-2012 for Grades 5 & 8

2010-2011 2011-2012* 2012-2013 2013-2014 2013-2014 2014-2015 2014-2015


8th Grade 78.3% 78.2% 72.4% 72.2% 66.7% 72.3% 82%

Male 81.6% 81.4% 74.0% 71.4% 72.9% 77.4% 82%

Female 75.0% 74.7% 70.9% 73.1% 59.8% 67.2% 82%

AmInd/AlkN 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 82%

Asian 50.0% 80.0% 33.3% 62.5% 50.0% 60.0% 82%

African/Am 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 57.1% 25.0% 22.2% 82%

Hispanic 36.4% 40.7% 55.2% 50.0% 34.5% 50.0% 50%

White 84.1% 85.0% 75.8% 78.5% 73.7% 80.1% 84%

LEP 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 25.0% 50%

SPED 48.0% 52.4% 31.3% 32.7% 40.6% 38.6% 50%

Econ Disad 55.4% 63.0% 63.8% 60.3% 50.6% 57.6% 60%

Migrant 66.7% 44.4% 50.0% 38.9% 0.0% 50.0% 50%

TAG 100.0% 96.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100%

Academic Achievement Gaps: Achievement has gone down each of the last two years Achievement is significantly lower than the district average Girls are significantly lower than boys in their achievement LEP and SpEd are achieving at a low level Academic Growth Gaps:

36

23

2012-2013 DATA ANALYSIS LIMIT TO 4-6 • Achievement has gone down each of the last two years • Achievement is significantly lower than the district average • Girls are significantly lower than boys in their achievement • LEP and SpEd are achieving at a low level •

TARGETS FOR THE 2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR LIMIT TO 4-6 • 82% OF 8TH GRADERS WILL PASS OAKS •GIRLS WILL ACHIEVE EQUIVALENT TO BOYS •LEP AND SPED WILL ACHIEVE AT 50% OR GREATER • •

37

24

SCIENCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN • may include Professional Development activities; if so, Support Structures section optional.


Science will work with MV PLC developing STEM lesson plans

September 30th staff development

day -at least 4 times this school year

Time

Professional development time and training will concentrate on PLC groups unwrapping standards, writing learning targets, creating rubrics, common assessments, and talking about instruction that has the most impact on student achievement. PLCs will have a common sequence of standards taught and a common scope by the end of this year. PLC groups from both middle schools will meet at least four times this school year Staff meetings will focus on introducing, re-enforcing, and/or improving research based effective teaching practices. Techniques will center upon those that satisfy both the auditory and visual learner. We will revisit SIOP strategies such as vocabulary strategies that can be utilized across the content areas. No more nuts and bolts.

Identify students in the various subgroups that need extra support and provide them with differentiated instruction. Identify students in different score ranges who could benefit from targeted interventions.

Twice per month

Four times this school year

Once per month

Ongoing

Time Time Time for meetings and time to plan Common assessments, progress monitoring, CARE team

Homework Club will be available for all students four days per week. Book study on the book Mindset by Carol Dweck

Ongoing

Ongoing

-Time sheet for classified supervisor -Time Book and time

38

25

Staff Development on literacy strategies utilized across the curriculum.

September 30th

January staff development day

-Use of district Reading TOSA -Time to Plan

Frequent classroom walk-throughs by administrators Ongoing Time

Science teachers will attend NSTA conference in October Science teachers will utilize district Science TOSA for staff development and/or demonstrating Science lessons Spanish for Spanish Speakers class intended to increase literacy in Native language with a focus on academic language in Science

October

Ongoing

One section

Registration fee-$160.00 per person Time .17 FTE

Benchmark Measures Measure Timeline Goal for Student Progress

8th grade OAKS Spring 82% of 8th graders will pass OAKS

Common Assessments Ongoing Show proficiency on standards taught

Grades

Scientific Inquiry Work Sample

Ongoing

Spring

Show proficiency on standards taught

Show proficiency on standards

taught

39

26

SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR ATTAINMENT OF READING, WRITING AND MATH GOALS (optional if professional development activities are included in content specific strategies).

Support Structures Implementation Method Professional Development:

Strategies are included in content specific strategies

Technology:

Differentiation Strategies (Gifted and Talented, Special Education, English Language Learners, At Risk, etc.):

Family and Community Involvement:

40

27

BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR GOALS

Budgeted Items

Money Allocated

Budget Source

Desired Outcomes for Use of Monies

Accomplishments and Points of Pride for the 2012-2013 School Year: We achieved a level 4 rating signifying that we are achieving above average in regards to student achievement and student growth on standardized test performance in Reading and Math. The level 4 rating also signifies that we have made significant growth the past two years within our subgroup populations most notably within our Latino, Underserved Races, and English Language Learners. We are not achieving where we would like with Special Education students in Math. Key Academic Highlights: -79.3% represents the two-year average of students meeting/exceeding the reading benchmark -74.8% represents the two-year average of students meeting/exceeding the math benchmark -80.6% represents our weighted percent as a school in regards to academic growth. This puts us in the upper tier of academic growth in comparison to other schools. -English Language Learner, Latino, and Underserved Races subgroups all achieved level 5 growth in Math for performance over the previous 2 years. Our growth as a school is due to five focuses: goals, instruction, data/assessment, relationships, and collaboration. We believe in measureable goals. We work hard to improve instruction incorporating daily learning targets, engagement strategies geared towards partner dialogue, group work, student movement, and Socratic questioning with frequent formative assessment. Our teachers meet frequently in professional learning communities engaging in work on standards, assessment, instruction, and student data. We set up multiple interventions for students, and have incorporated a standards/proficiency based grading model to provide us more accurate student data. We are a PBIS school and last year finished with a 95% attendance rate.

41

28

Site Council Team Attendance Record

(Attendance Indicated by X) Member Name

Role Date: Date: Date: Date: Date:

Jon Franco Principal Larry Hampton Asst Principal Sarah Goehler Math Teacher Bethany Stoller Core Teach Heidi King ELL Susan Clayton Counselor Tina Oathes Classified Gregg Koskela Parent Principal’s Signature:

42


Item: Middle School Schedule Information Originator: Dr. Jon Franco, Wayne Strong and middle school team Presenter: Dr. LeBlanc-Esparza, Dr. Franco Background: Dr. LeBlanc-Esparza will share the plan for aligning the CVMS and MVMS schedules to increase instructional time for students. INFORMATION

43


Item: Graduation Rate Presentation Information Originator: Don Staples, Director of Data and Assessment Presenter: Don Staples, Director of Data and Assessment Background: Mr. Staples will present the graduation rate data recently released by the Oregon Department of Education. INFORMATION

47

Transfers, 35 Other, 1

Regular Diploma, 285

Modified Diploma, 7

GED, 18

Alternate Certificate, 3

Continuing Fall 2013, 27 Non-

Completers, 67

2009-10 Cohort Enrolled at any time through 2012-13

Transfers

Other

Regular Diploma

Modified Diploma

GED

Alternate Certificate

Regular Diploma, 285

Modified Diploma, 7

GED, 18

Alternate Certificate,

3

Continuing Fall 2013, 27

Non-Completers,

67

Adjusted Cohort Newberg SD Accountability

Regular Diploma

Modified Diploma

GED

Alternate Certificate

407 Students 443 Students

48

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Cohort 4-Year Graduation Rate Class of 2011, 2012 & 2013

2011

2012

2013

Number in parenthesis is number of students in group for the 2013 cohort

Source: ODE

49

70% 69% 87% 86%

71% 76% 80% 93%

80% 82% 89% 89%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

100%

Newberg State of Oregon

Canby Century Dayton Forest Grove

McMinnville Sherwood Sunset Tigard Tualatin Wilsonville

Comparison High Schools

Class of 2013 Graduation Rate 4-Year Cohort Comparison

50

4th Year, 47

3rd Year, 12

2nd Year, 6 1st Year, 2

When were the non-completers last enrolled?

4th Year

3rd Year

2nd Year

1st Year

KG, 158

1st, 36

2nd, 21 3rd, 28

4th, 24

5th, 20

6th, 17

7th, 19

8th, 21

9th, 19

10th, 21

11th, 13 12th, 10

When did the adjusted cohort students first enroll?

75.3% 73.7%

42.9%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Elementary School (287)

Middle School (57) High School (63)

Earning a regular diploma by level of first enrollment in Newberg

51

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

5-Year Cohort Completer Rate Class of 2010, 2011, & 2012

2010

2011

2012

Number in parenthesis represents number of students in group for

52


Item: Open Enrollment Decision and Parameters Action Originator: Mikaela Schamp, Board Secretary Presenter: Mikaela Schamp, Board Secretary Topic Summary: Take action regarding Open Enrollment per House Bill 3681 Background: Prior to March 1, 2014 the Board of Directors must determine and announce the number of students the district will accept via the HB 3681 process. The number may be one of the following: all, none (0), all with bill approved limitations, or a specific quantity (example: 100 students.) The District may not use the language “eligible” students in correlation with the number of students they will accept via HB 3681. All students are eligible for transfer under HB 3681. Districts have three options: 1. Do not accept transfers under the Open Enrollment process. 2. Open the district to transfers with no limitation. (Automatically effective if the Board does not make a decision otherwise.) 3. Open the district to transfers with limitation. Per HB 3681 (4) (a) if the Board does not make and communicate a decision on Option 1 or Option 3, than Option 2 will automatically be effective. (“(4)(a) A district school board must give consent to a person who requests consent unless” the District will accept no transfers or transfers with limitations.) District staff recommends that the Board open the district to all transfers with limitations. The limitations recommended are as follows: 2014-15 Guidelines for Open Enrollment (House Bill 3681) Transfers High School Accept all students who apply via open enrollment at Grades 9 and 10 only. Accept no students who apply via open enrollment at Grades 11 and 12. Note: If students wish to enroll in grades 11-12, families may follow the “traditional” method of requesting inter-district transfers. That method includes an annual application that must be approved by superintendents of the sending and receiving districts. Middle School Accept all students who apply via open enrollment at both middle schools Grades 6 through 8. (continued on following page)

53

Elementary School Accept all students who apply via open enrollment at all elementary schools Grades K through 5 with the exception of:

Mabel Rush Elementary School where enrollment is closed because the school is currently at enrollment capacity

Dual Language Program at Edwards Elementary School due to enrollment limitations Online Learning Program- Chehalem Online Learning Alliance Accept no students who apply via open enrollment. Acceptance of all non-resident students by the Newberg School District via any admission avenue, including open enrollment, will follow Board Policy JECB- Admission of Non Resident Students. ____________________________________________________________________________________ All types of transfers will be affected by House Bill 2747 but parameters are still being developed. Recommendation: Move that the Newberg School District Board of Directors accept all students who apply through Open Enrollment (House Bill 3681) for 2014-15 school year according to the limitations as presented.

54


Item: Board Policy BFD- Policy Implementation, Revised, First Reading Action Originator: Mikaela Schamp, Board Secretary Presenter: Policy Committee Background: Policy BFD has been updated to reflect more up-to-date availability and retention practices regarding Board policy. The Policy Committee recommends adopting on first reading.

Recommendation: Move that the Newberg School District Board of Directors adopt Policy BFD- Board Policy Implementation, Revised, on first reading.

55

Board Policy Implementation - BFD 1-1

Newberg School District 29J Code: BFD Adopted: 7/10/06 Revised: Board Policy Implementation Effective Date of Policies All new or amended policies shall become effective on the day after adoption by the Board, unless a specific date is included in the motion for adoption. Policy Implementation The superintendent and administrative staff shall implement Board policies. The superintendent may formulate administrative regulations and procedures to assist policy implementation. It shall be the Board’s duty to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy and the effectiveness of the administration’s implementation of the policy. Policy Dissemination The written policies that govern the district shall be maintained in a policy manual to be updated by district staff as new policies are developed or existing policies are revised or repealed. Each Board member shall be provided with policies and administrative regulations. Each school shall provide at least one copy of the make available for inspection to the public and district employees, copies of the Board’s policy manual in the school’s library and one copy in the business office. Each employee will be specifically notified of the existence and availability of and personnel policies. The Board’s policy manual shall be considered a public record and shall be open for inspection at the district office during regular working hours. The superintendent shall provide channels for disseminating appropriate policies to the community. END OF POLICY Legal Reference(s): ORS 192.410(4) ORS 332.107

ORS 332.505

OAR 581-022-1610 OAR 581-022-1720

56


Item: Future Agendas Information Originator: Mikaela Schamp, Board Secretary February 25, 2014 Financial Report Ewing Young Elementary Student Recognition Contracts Action- Teacher & Administrator Present Supt Evaluation- Action Classified Appreciation (for Mar. 3-7) Policy First Reading 6:00pm Work Session: Strat Plan Priorities/Frame March 11, 2014 March 18- Budget Committee/Board Workshop 2014-15 Calendar (No action) SIP Presentations- Joan Austin NHS- Yellow School District Strategic Plan- Goals, Tasks and Timelines Work Session: HS Credit Req./Oregon Diploma Policy Second Reading April 8, 2014 April 22, 2014 Financial Report High School Achievement Report Establish Student Fees Crater Recognition (moved from Dec. 10) Policy First Reading Policy Second Reading Mabel Rush Elementary Recognition Follow Up Catalyst Report Technology Task Force Recommendation HB 2220- Standards Based Grading Teacher Appreciation (for May 5-9) Completed Strategic Plan Presentation April 29, 2014- Budget Comm. Mtg #1 Elect Officers Superintendent delivers budget message Proposed Budget presented Subcommittee Assignments & mtg dates May 13, 2014 May 20, 2014- Budget Committee Mtg #2 Financial Report Budget Subcommittee reports Policies Remaining Update revenue projections based on SSF Silver School Approve any supplemental changes in Budget House Bill 2747 Action (Transfers) Approve budget and set tax levies Establish Meal Prices 13-14 AP Social Studies Approval?

57

May 27, 2014 Budget Hearing at 6:30pm Goals Progress Report Edwards Elementary Resolution: Budget & Tax Levies June 10, 2014 June 24, 2014 Climate and Culture Report Board Calendar for 2014-15 Establish Food Commodity Contracts

58

NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT 29J BOARD OF DIRECTORS … · 2015. 7. 24. · NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT 29J...

Documents

Transcript of NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT 29J BOARD OF DIRECTORS … · 2015. 7. 24. · NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT 29J...