New Trends in Higher Education Quality Assurance in Europe
-
Upload
colin-tueck -
Category
Education
-
view
176 -
download
4
Transcript of New Trends in Higher Education Quality Assurance in Europe
European Quality AssuranceRegister for Higher Education
New Trends in Higher EducationQuality Assurance in Europe
New Trends in Higher Education: Keeping Up With the ChangeIstanbul, 12 April 2016
Colin Tück
Vision
The European Higher Education Area's (EHEA) vision torespond to the current societal challenges:
Higher education contributing to inclusive societies
Providing opportunities and perspectives tostudents
Promoting democracy and human rights
Safeguarding academic freedom
Mobility and cooperation as key to understanding
EHEA Priorities
Enhancing the quality and relevance of learningand teaching
Fostering the employability of graduates Making our systems more inclusive Implementing agreed structural reforms
(see Yerevan Ministerial Communiqué 2015)
EHEA framework forquality assurance
European Standards andGuidelines (ESG) Modernised and improved 2015
version Common ground for QA in
Europe
European Quality AssuranceRegister (EQAR) Agencies that comply
substantially with the ESG – athome and abroad
Processes for substantivechanges and complaints
42 registered QAAs
Governmental memberswithout registered agency
Standards and Guidelines forQA in the EHEA (ESG)
Common standards for internal and external QA Developed jointly by the main stakeholders Agreed by ministers in 2005, revised in 2015
Purposes: Set a common framework for quality assurance
systems at European, national and institutional level; Enable the assurance and improvement of quality; Support mutual trust, thus facilitating recognition and
mobility within and across national borders; Provide information on quality assurance in the EHEA.
ESG – principles for QA
Higher education institutions have primaryresponsibility for quality
Responds to the diversity of systems, institutions,programmes and students
Support the development of a quality culture; Take into account the needs and expectations of
students, all other stakeholders and society Transparency and publication of results Independence of external QA agencies
European Quality Assurance Registerfor Higher Education (EQAR)
Established by E4 at Ministers'request, jointly governed bystakeholders and governments
Non-profit and independent, acting inthe public interest
Mission: enhancing trust andconfidence in EHEA
Main role: to manage a register ofQAAs that comply substantially withthe ESG
Stakeholderorganisations
Governments
Observers
Register CommitteeIndependent QA experts,
nominated by stakeholders
approves
Challenges in QualityAssurance
Diversity of higher education institutions New modes of educational provision and cooperation Growth of internationalisation, TNE More student-centred approach to learning and teaching Flexible learning paths Recognising prior learning Demonstrate quality, increase transparency and build
mutual trust
New in QA after Yerevan
1. ESG 2015 adopted2. Cross-border external quality assurance
“enable our higher education institutions to use a suitableEQAR registered agency for their external quality assuranceprocess [...]”
3. European Approach for QA of Joint Programmes4. Automatic recognition
“By 2020 we are determined to achieve an EHEA […] whereautomatic recognition of qualifications has become a reality sothat students and graduates can move easily throughout it”
1. ESG 2015 – what'snew?
Clarified that ESG are applicable to non-traditional HE, new modes of delivery,transnational provision, etc.
Better integrated in overall EHEA framework References to qualifications frameworks, other tools
Underline institutional responsibility for quality Stronger focus on whole student experience
E.g. admission, progression, student-centred learning
1. ESG 2015 – what'snew?
Take account of changed context Cross-border QA HEIs work with changing QAAs Stakeholder model consolidated
Many principles more clear now, e.g. Publication of full reports Students on review panels Appeals Professional conduct of QAAs
➔ Reflecting EHEA's progress over last 10 years
2. Quality assurancecrossing borders
9
41
1
2
4
36
12
11
6 1 1 1
1
4
63
36 26
15 16 82 6 3 17 3 7 2
26
1
5 110 81 11119 6 136 67
71 112 97 702 271 55 278 739 1097
Total Home Inst CBEQA Prog CBEQA
2. Cross-border QA
Opportunities Challenges
HigherEducationInstitutions
● International visibility● Valuable feedback● Increased commitment● Different approaches● Suit their own mission
● Identify suitable agency● Workload and costs● Unknown expectations● Language
QualityAssuranceAgencies
● International profile● Experience relevant for
work at home● Diversification
● Unfamiliar context● Adapting standards● Language
2. But: national legalframeworks lag behind
Despite the robustEuropean framework inplace … Cross-border
accreditation/ evaluationnot fully recognised
In addition/parallel toobligatory nationalexternal QA
Duplication of efforts forinstitutions Recognising EQAR-registered agencies as part of the national
requirements for external QA
Recognising foreign agencies with own/specific framework
Discussions ongoing
Countries not recognising external QA by foreign agency
3. European Approach forQA of Joint Programmes
Before After
Multiple, fragmented reviews Single review
Combining various national rulesand criteria
Agreed Standards, based on ESG &QF-EHEA
Complex procedures, ad hocdesign
Agreed Procedure
Adopted by ministers in Yerevan to lift obstacles to theQA of joint programmes
4. Automatic recognition
Part of the ministers' vision for the EHEA 2020 Important topic for quality assurance:
Need for QA and qualifications framework to workhand-in-hand to make AR work See also ESG standard 1.2
Need to analyse recognition practices in QA See ESG standard 1.4
Brings new expectations for Bologna tools
Conclusions
Important decisions for European QA at Yerevan
Expectations – not only – from QA are rising
ESG 2015: more coherent, robust framework
EQAR working with stakeholders and governments Cross-border QA: practical guidance for QAAs/HEIs,
national legal frameworks
European Approach for QA of JP: national implementation
Automatic recognition: support from side of QA