New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics...
-
Upload
norman-simpson -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
2
Transcript of New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics...
![Page 1: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy(Experimental Review)
Shan JINInstitute of High Energy Physics (IHEP)
Chinese Academy of Sciences
August 20, 2004
ICHEP 2004, Beijing
![Page 2: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Multi-quark State, Glueball and Hybrid
Hadrons consist of 2 or 3 quarks :
Naive Quark Model :
New forms of hadrons:• Multi-quark states : Number of quarks > = 4 • Hybrids : qqg , qqqg …
• Glueballs : gg , ggg …
Meson ( q q )
Baryon ( q q q )
![Page 3: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Multi-quark states, glueballs and hybrids have been searched for experimentally for a very long time, but none is established.
However, during the past one year, a lot of surprising experimental evidences showed the existence of hadrons that cannot (easily) be explained in the conventional quark model.
![Page 4: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
There are so many exciting unexpected new observations as well as many negative search results that I will not be able to cover many “conventional” topics, such as charm baryons, charmonium production…
I would deeply apologize to those experiments who contribute these beautiful results to the conference.
![Page 5: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Outline Multi-quark candidates:
• Pentaquarks
• X(3872)
• DsJ(2632)
• Resonant structures near mass thresholds and J/ mass thresholds.
Light scalar mesons:
• σ, κ, f0(980), f0(1370), f0(1500), f0(1710), f0(1790)
Other interesting results from BES and CLEO-c
Kpppp C ,,,
![Page 6: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Observations of pentaquarks
![Page 7: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Θ+(1540)
First evidence of pentaquark was presented by LEPS in the process :
Nevent= 19 +/- 2.8
Significance: ~ 4.6 σ
Minimum quark content: uudds
Its mass and width are consistent with chiral soliton model prediction.
MnK+
LEPSnKKn
MeV
MeVM
25
5101540
at 90% CL
)/( BS
![Page 8: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
CLAS
KpnKd
M(nK+)
2.5:~
43
21
51542
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
)/( BS
M(nK+)
CLAS
8.7:~
41
26
101555
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
)/( BS
KnKp
![Page 9: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SAPHIR
0SKnKp
M(nK+)
8.4:
1363
25
241540
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
(fit)
3.0~))1520(*(/))1540(()1520(* R
![Page 10: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
M(pKs)
4~3~
6~4:~
60~
3917
231528
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
)/( BS
SS NN /
Inclusive γ*- production
HERMES
5.3~6.1~)1520(*R
![Page 11: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Fragmentation ZEUS
6.4~9.3:~
48221
48
5.15.1521 8.27.1
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
(fit)
RΛ ~ 0.04
Assuming the production rate of Λ*(1520) is 5 times smaller than Λ, I estimated:
RΛ*(1520) ~ 0.2
M(pKs)
![Page 12: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
M(pKs)
Asratyan et al.- induced
7.6:~
27
20
51533
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
)/( BS
DIANA
)( 0
'0
pKnK
XepKXeK
M(pKs)
4.4:~
29
9
221539
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
)/( BS
![Page 13: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
XpKpA
SVD
S
0
2
b
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
120~30)(
6.5:~
50
24
331526
M(pKs)
)/( BS
0SpKpp
TOFCOSY
M(pKs)
b
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
1.01.04.0)(
9.5~7.3:~
120~
18
51530
![Page 14: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Pentaquarks at JINR
How many pentaquarks did they see?
M(nK+)
![Page 15: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
(LEPS)
nK
MΘ
0SpK
0SpKnK
F. Close and Q. Zhao, hep-ph/0404075
![Page 16: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
ΓΘ
PDG 04:
(R.N. Cahn, G.H.Trilling, PR D69 011501R, based on the production cro
ss-section estimation from DIANA data, σR=ABiBfΓ)
Consistent with other estimation of the upper limit on the width based on K+N partial wave reanalysis
( < 1 MeV )
Why the width is so narrow seems very hard to understand.
MeV3.09.0
![Page 17: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Isospin of Θ+(1540)
No Θ++ was observed by SAPHIR, HERMES or other experiments.
Θ+ is an isoscalar
![Page 18: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Ξ--(1862)
Also evidence for Ξ0(1862)
( I = 3/2 )
NA49 )a
)b
)c
)d
)( M
ussdd
dssdu
dudss
uddss 8.5:~
69
18
21862
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
)/( BSS
)))) dcba
)( M
pp collision at Ecm=17.2GeV
![Page 19: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Θc(3099)
Minimum quark content: uuddc
4.5:~
2.116.50
12
533099
ceSignifican
N
MeV
MeVM
event
DIS (Q2 > 1GeV2)
Poisson Prob.
01.0~))3099(()3099( pDBRN
Nc
D
c
![Page 20: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Negative search results on pentaquarks
![Page 21: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
BES
Upper limits @ 90% C.L.
BR ( (2S) (KSp)(K-n) + (KSp)(K+n))< 0.84X10-5
BR ( J/ (KSp)(K-n) + (KSp)(K+n)) < 1.1 X10-5
(2S) J/
RΛ*(1520) < ?
![Page 22: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ALEPH
No evidence for Θ+(1540), Ξ--(1862), Ξ0(1862) , Θc(3100)
in Z decays
M(pKs)
![Page 23: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Also no evidence for Θ+(1540), Θ++(1540) at DELPHI
ALEPH Limits at 95% C.L.
018.0))3100((
0031.0))3100((
16.0))1862((
082.0))1862((
027.0))1535((
0)3100(
0)3100(
0
)1530(
)1862(
)1530(
)1862(
0
)1520(
)1535(
0
0
0
0
0
pDBRN
N
pDBRN
N
BRN
N
BRN
N
pKBRN
N
c
D
c
D
s
c
c
![Page 24: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
No evidence for Θ+(1540) in two photon collisions.
L3
![Page 25: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
CDF No evidence of Θ+(1540), Ξ--(1862), Ξ0(1862) or Θc(3100)
observed at CDF.
M(pKs)
Θc(3100)
Θ+(1540)
![Page 26: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
HERA-B
M(pKs)
)( M
)1540(
)1860(
No evidence of Θ+(1540), Ξ--(1862), Ξ0(1862) at HERA-B(proton-nucleus collisions at )GeVs 6.41
CLR %[email protected]~027.0)1520(*
CL
BR
%95@
04.0)1530(/)1862( 0
![Page 27: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Θc(3099) was not observed at ZEUS in a data sample
which is 1.7 times of the H1 data sample.
M(D*p)
0035.0)(
pDBRN
Nc
D
c
95% C.L. upper limit:
Inconsistent with H1: ~0.01
ZEUS
More quantitative comparisonsrequire detector efficiency corrections.
![Page 28: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
BaBar
No evidence of Θ+(1540), Ξ--(1862) or other possible pentaquarks was observed at BaBar. Upper limits were set.
RΛ*(1520) < ~ 0.01
@ 90 % CL
003.0~)1530(/)1862( 0 BR
![Page 29: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Belle
Belle did not see Θ+(1540):
RΛ*(1520) < 0.02
@ 90 % CL
Θc(3100) was not seen
either.
155fb-1
(1520)
nothing
m(GeV)
pK-
pKS
![Page 30: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Inconsistencies (I)
Width of Θ+(1540)
• Two “positive” experiments:
HERMES: ΓΘ = 17 9 2 MeV
ZEUS: ΓΘ = 8 4 MeV
• K+N PWA results indicates ΓΘ < 1 MeV
Mass of Θ+(1540)
![Page 31: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
(LEPS)
nK
MΘ
0SpK
0SpKnK
![Page 32: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Inconsistencies (II) Production rate (e.g. for Θ+(1540) )
• “Positive” experiments:
SAPHIR: RΛ*(1520) ~ 0.3
HERMES: RΛ*(1520) ~ 1.6~3.5
ZEUS: RΛ*(1520) ~ 0.2 ( I estimated from RΛ ~ 0.04 )
SVD-2: RΛ*(1520) > 0.2 ( estimated by SPHINX,
hep-ex/0407026)
• “Negative” experiments:
ALEPH: RΛ*(1520) < 0.1
BaBar: RΛ*(1520) < ~ 0.01 Belle: <0.02
HERA-B: RΛ*(1520) < 0.027~0.16
SPHINX: RΛ*(1520) < 0.02
![Page 33: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The “negative” experiments have much larger statistics, also are at relatively higher energies (but Babar and Belle are at low energy).
• Pentaquarks do not exist, or• Pentaquarks have very exotic production me
chanism. via N*? Then why N* has much higher production rate at low energy?
Looking forward to more experimental results at low energy with high statistics, especially those photo-production experiments !
![Page 34: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Comments on statistical significance
Using to estimate statistical significance seems too optimistic. Even if we have firm knowledge on the background CLb as LEP
Higgs used is recommended.
When the background is estimated from the fit of sideband, the likelihood ratio with D.O.F. taken into consideration is a better estimator of statistical significance.
• In this case, the uncertainty of all possible background shapes should be included in the uncertainty of significance.
Do not optimize/tune the cuts on the data! Determine the cuts based on MC optimization before looking at data.
• The sys. uncertainty on significance from “bias” cut is hard to estimate.
“Look elsewhere” effect may reduce the significance by 1~2σ.
BS /
![Page 35: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
X(3872)
![Page 36: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
First observed by Belle Experiments in:
![Page 37: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
M(J/) –M(J/)
’J/
X(3872) 10σeffect
Belle
MeV
MeVM
3.2
5.06.00.3872
at 90% C.L.
![Page 38: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
X(3872) at CDF and D0
5.2 effect
11.6 effect
MeVM X 4.07.03.3871 MeVMM JX 0.31.39.774/
![Page 39: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
X(3872) at BaBar
The significance is low (about 3.5 σ), but its production rate is consistent with Belle:
/JM
3.5 σ effect
510)41.028.1()/()(
4.14.3873
JXBXKBBR
MeVM X
510)3.03.1(: Belle
BaBar
![Page 40: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
No evidence of X is observed in B0 XK+, B XK0
s with X J/ - 0.
So, isovector hypothesis of X disfavored.
Search for B XK at BaBar
Mode B J/0K+
B J/0K0s
n obs. 87 31
n bkg. 101.8 ± 10.2 27.6 ± 6.2
n signal -14.8 ± 13.9 3.4 ± 8.3
90%CL < 5.8 x 10-6 < 11 x 10-6
![Page 41: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
CLEO – γγFusion and ISR
eVJXBX
eVJXBXJ
ee 0.8)/)3872(())3872((
9.12)/)3872(())3872(()12(
(90% C.L)
Consistent with Yuan et al. estimation from BES data: JPC=1- - disfavoured
![Page 42: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
New decay mode observed at Belle
Belle observed a new decay mode of X(3872) *J/ +-0J/
(XJ/)/(X J/) = 0.8 ±0.3± 0.1
M()
M(J
/
)
BK X(3872)
Nevt=10.0 ± 3.6Signif = 5.8
![Page 43: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
No other decay modes of X(3872) are observed
So far, it is only observed in J/ and *J/ modes.
90% C.L. upper limits (most from Belle):
Non-observation of DD modes suggests that JP=0+, 1-, 2+,…, is ruled out.
6)/(/)(
7)/(/)(
6.0)/(/)/(
40.0)/(/)/(
1.1)/(/)(
89.0)/(/)(
000
2
1
JXDDX
JXDDX
JXJX
JXJX
JXX
JXX
c
c
BaBar
![Page 44: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Is X(3872) a Charmonium? All possible charmonium assignments seem to
have difficulties (S.L. Olsen, hep-ex/0407033):
State nickname JPC comment
13 D2 ψ2 2-- Mass wrong; Гγχc1 too small
21 P1 h’c 1+- Ruled out by |cosθJ/ψ| distribution
13 D3 ψ3 3-- Mass & width wrong; Гγχc2 too small; Spin is too high
23 P1 χ’c1 1++ ГγJ/ψ too small
11D2 ηc2 2-+ B(π+π- J/ψ ) expected to be very small
31 S0 η”c 0-+ Mass and width are wrong
![Page 45: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
DD* “Molecular State”? MX(3872) is very close to MD + MD*.
It was suggested that a DD* multi-quark “molecular state” have large BR(XD0D00). Belle observes:
Some theoretical calculations predict the above ratio is small. (Swanson’s talk in Session 10)
Swanson also predicts:
Consistent with Belle new observation.
6)/(/)( 000 JXDDX at 90% C.L.
6.0~)/(/)/( JXJX
![Page 46: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
DsJ(2632)
![Page 47: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
DsJ(2317) and DsJ(2460)
BaBar - DsJ(2317) CLEO Belle
DSJ(2317)
DSJ(2460)
DSJ(2317)
DSJ(2460)
DSJ(2460)
)( 0SDM
)( 0SDM
)( 0*SDM
0SD
0*SD
SD
KKDS
0 KKDS
)( sJDM
![Page 48: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
DSJ(2632) at SELEX
A narrow resonance was observed in mode.
Nevent = 45.0 9.3
The significance is about 7.2 σ using .
Probability of 6 bins region with > 100 events anywhere on this plot with background of 54.4+/-2.5:
3x10-6 ~4.6σ)( SDM
SD
BS /
(Talk given by P.S. Cooper at PIC 2004)
DsJ(2632)
![Page 49: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
DSJ(2632) was also observed in D0K+ mode.
Nevent = 14.0 4.5
The significance is about 5.3 σ (?) using .
)( 0 KDMBS /
![Page 50: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Properties of DSJ(2632)
Mass: 2632.6 1.6 MeV ( above D(*) K threshold )
Narrow Width: < 17 MeV at 90% C.L.
Unusual decay pattern:
What is it?• First radial excitation of DS*(2112)?• A csg hybrid?• A tetraquark or molecular state? ( Y.Q. Chen and X.Q. Li, hep-ph/0407062; K.T. Chao, hep-ph/0407091;
T. Barnes et al., hep-ph/0407120; Y.R. Liu et al., hep-ph/0407157 … )
Next talk
06.016.0)(/)( 0 SDKD
![Page 51: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
DSJ(2632) search at CLEO
SELEX noted one-bin excess at 2636 MeV in CLEO 2.16 fb-1data.
However, CLEO did not observe a narrow peak around 2632 MeV in 20 fb-1 data.
DsJ(2632) ?
![Page 52: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
2s GeV/c η)m(D
DsJ(2632)+
Even
ts/1
0
MeV
/c2
DSJ(2632) search at BaBar
BaBar did not see DSJ(2632) in the same decay modes as SELEX in 125 fb-1 data.
![Page 53: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
DsJ(2632) B (DsJ(2632)) D0K) DsJ(2573) B(DsJ (2573)) D0K)
<1.2% @90%CL
Known state DsJ(2573) is clearly seen (N=7292164) but no sign of DsJ(2632) (N=-66 64)
DsJ(2632)
N/
2M
eV
D0K+ mass
Ds mode under study
cf. SELEX 56 27%
550 M(MeV) 850
SELEX
DSJ(2632) search at Belle
155fb-1Belle
![Page 54: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Resonant structures near , KΛ mass thresholds
and J/ mass thresholds
cpppp ,,
![Page 55: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Observation of an anomalous enhancement near the threshold of mass spectrum at BES II
M=1859 MeV/c2
< 30 MeV/c2 (90% CL)
J/pp
M(pp)-2mp (GeV)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
3-body phase space acceptance
2/dof=56/56
acceptance weighted BW +3 +5
10 25
pp
BES II
![Page 56: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
With threshold kinematic contributions removed, there are very smooth threshold enhancements in elastic “matrix element” and very small enhancement in annihilation “matrix element”:
much weaker than what BES observed !
NO strong dynamical threshold enhancement in cross sections (at LEAR)
pp
pp
pmppM 2)(
|M|2 |M|2BES BES
elasticelasticM ~|| 2 annlabann PM ~|| 2
Both arbitrary normalization Both arbitrary normalization
![Page 57: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Any inconsistency? NO!
For example: with Mres = 1859 MeV, Γ = 30 MeV, J=0, BR(ppbar) ~ 10%, an estimation based on:
At Ecm = 2mp + 6 MeV ( i.e., pLab = 150 MeV ), in elastic process, the resonant cross section is ~ 0.6 mb : much smaller than the continuum cross section ~ 94 20 mb .
Difficult to observe it in cross sections.
4/)(4
)(4
)12)(12(
)12(22
2
22
2
21
rescm
outin
pcmres mE
BB
mE
c
SS
J
pp
![Page 58: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Why can it be seen in J/ decays, but not in cross sections?
Reason is simple:
J/ decays do not suffer large t-channel “background”. It is an s-channel effect !
pp
>>
p p p p
p
p p p p
p
/J
![Page 59: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Final State Interaction ? —— Not favored
1. Theoretical calculation (Zou and Chiang, PRD69 034004 (2003)) shows: The enhancement caused by one-pion-exchange (OPE) FSI is too small to explain the BES structure.
2. The enhancement caused by Coulomb interaction is even smaller than one-pion-exchange FSI !
BES
one-pion-exchange FSI
|M|2 |M|2
Both arbitrary normalization
BES
pmppM 2)(
Both arbitrary normalization
Coulomb interaction
![Page 60: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Final State Interaction ? —— Not favored
Theoretical calculation might be unreliable, however, according to Watson’s theorem, we can use elastic scattering experiments to check the FSI effect, i.e.,if the BES structure were from FSI, it should be the same as in elastic scattering: But it is NOT ! FSI cannot
explainthe BES structure.
/J
p
p
p p
p pelastic scattering
|M|2 BES
Both arbitrary normalization
elasticelasticM ~|| 2
pmppM 2)(
![Page 61: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
pp bound state (baryonium)?
+ n +
deuteron:
loosely bound 3-q 3-
q color singlets with Md = 2mp-
baryonium:
loosely bound
3-q 3-q color singlets with Mb = 2mp-
?
attractive nuclear force attractive force?
There is lots & lots of literature about this possibility
E. Fermi, C.N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 76, 1739 (1949)
…I.S. Sharpiro, Phys. Rept. 35, 129 (1978)C.B. Dover, M. Goldhaber, PRD 15, 1997 (1977)…A. Datta, P.J. O’Donnell, PLB 567, 273 (2003)]M.L. Yan et al., hep-ph/0405087
Observations of this structure in otherdecay modes are desirable.
![Page 62: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Observation of an anomalous enhancement near the threshold of mass spectrum at BES IIp
BES II pKJ /
3-body phase space
For a S-wave BW fit: M = 2075 12 5 MeV Γ = 90 35 9 MeV
![Page 63: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
)(GeV/c2
ΛKM
PS, eff. corrected
MMM KΛK
Observation of a strong enhancement near the threshold of mass spectrum at BES IIK
(Arbitrary normalization)
BES II pKJ /
NX*
![Page 64: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
A strong enhancement is observed near the mass threshold of MK at BES II.
Preliminary PWA with various combinations of possible N* and Λ* in the fits —— The structure Nx*has:
Mass 1500~1650MeV
Width 70~110MeV
JP favors 1/2-
consistent with N*(1535)
The most important is:
It has large BR(J/ψ pNX*) BR(NX* KΛ) 2 X 10-4 ,
suggesting NX*has strong coupling to KΛ.indicating it could be a KΛ molecular state
(5 - quark system). cf: f0(980)
![Page 65: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Fit with BW:
Observation of an anomalous enhancement near the threshold of mass spectrum at Bellecp
Belle cpB
2
202.003.0
/)04.004.009.0(
/)02.034.3(
cGeV
cGeVM
,,,, 00 pKpKpKc
![Page 66: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
If it is fit with a BW:
Significance: > 8
Observation of an anomalous enhancement near the threshold of J/ mass spectrum at Belle
Belle
BKJ/MeV
MeVM
2492
113941
![Page 67: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Threshold Enhancements in J/ decays and B decays
They may come from different mechanism:
There is “fragmentation” mechanism in B decays but NOT in J/ decays.
KppB
Belle
BES II
ppJ /
“Threshold” enhancement in B decays is much wider and is not really at threshold. It can be explained by fragmentation mechanism.
Threshold enhancement in J/ decays is obviously much more narrow and just at threshold, and it cannot be explained by fragmentation mechanism.
![Page 68: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Is the STRONG threshold enhancement universal in J/ decays ? —— NO !
Actually in many other cases we do NOT see STRONG threshold enhancements !
For example: In J/ decays at BES II
np J /
)( pM
)(KKMpmppM 2)(
KKJ /
)( pKM
pKJ /
0/ ppJ
![Page 69: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Light Scalar Mesons:
σ, κ, f0(980), f0(1370),
f0(1500), f0(1710), f0(1790)
![Page 70: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Why light scalar mesons are interesting?
There have been hot debates on the existence of σ and κ .
σ, κ and f0(980) are also possible mutiquark states. They are all near threshold.
Lattice QCD predicts the 0++ scalar glueball mass ~ 1.6 GeV. f0(1500) and f0(1710) are good candidates.
![Page 71: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
σ at BES BES II observed σ in J/ +-.
Pole position from PWA:
BES II
M
MeVi )42252()39541(
![Page 72: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
BES II observed in J/K*KKK.
Preliminary PWA result
Pole position:
κ at BES
BES IIPreliminary
MeVi )420~310()840~760(
![Page 73: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Important parameters from PWA fit:
Large coupling with KK indicates big component in f0(980)
BES IIPreliminary
/J
KKJ /
f0(980) at BES
21.025.021.4
1510165
68965
g
g
MeVg
MeVM
KK
ss
f0(980)
f0(980)
![Page 74: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
f0(980) is observed in f0(980) at KLOE (Background: ISR, FSR and ).
The results support that f0(980) has large coupling with KK.
f0(980) at KLOE
KLOEPreliminary
f0(980) f0(980)
)(M )(M
Background subtracted
![Page 75: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
There has been some debate whether f0(1370) exist or not.
f0(1370) clearly seen in J/ , but not seen in J/ .
/J
BES IIPreliminary
/J
PWA 0++ components
f0(1370)
NO f0(1370)
f0(1370) at BES
MeV
MeVM
40265
501350
![Page 76: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Clear f0(1710) peak in J/ KK.
No f0(1710) observed in J/ !
f0(1710) at BES
BES IIPreliminary
KKJ /
/J
f0(1710)
NO f0(1710)
MeV
MeVM
20125
301740
CLKKfBR
))1710((
))1710((
0
0
![Page 77: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
ZEUS observed a narrow peak around 1730 MeV in KSKS mode:
Its width is much narrower than BES and others. Spin-parity needed.
How many mesons in this mass range?
f0(1710) (?) at ZEUS
f0(1710) ???
MeV
MeVM201438
71726
![Page 78: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
A clear peak around 1790 MeV is observed in J/ .
No evident peak in J/ KK. If f0(1790) were the same as f0(1710), we would have:
Inconsistent with what we observed in J/ , KK
New f0(1790) at BES
BES IIPreliminary
/Jf0(1790)
KKJ /?
MeV
MeVM6030
4030
270
1790
5.1~))1710((
))1790((
0
0
KKfBR
fBR
CLKKfBR
))1710((
))1710((
0
0
f0(1790) is a new scalar !
![Page 79: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Scalars in J/ , KK
Two scalars in J/ :
• One is around 1470 MeV, may be f0(1500)?
• The other is around 1765 MeV, is it f0(1790) or a mixture of f0(1710) and f0(1790)?
One scalar f0(1710) in J/ KK.
BES IIPreliminary
/J
?)1500(0f ?)1710(0f
)1710(0f
KKJ /
![Page 80: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
f0(1500) at BES
One scalar with a mass = 1466 6 16 MeV is needed in J/ , is it f0(1500)? Why the mass is different from PDG?
No peak directly seen in , KK, , KK.
![Page 81: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
OZI rule and flavor tagging in J/ hadronic decays
In J/ hadronic decays, an or Φ signal deter
mines the or component, respe
ctively. OZI rule
dduu ss
/J /J
dduu
ss
![Page 82: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Unusual properties of f0(1370), f0(1710) and f0(1790)
f0(1710):
• It dominantly decays to KK (not to )
• It is mainly produced together with (not ) • What is it ?
f0(1370) and f0(1790)
• They dominantly decays to (not to KK) • It is mainly produced together with (not ) • What are they ?
Scalar Puzzle
dduu
dduu
ss
ss
![Page 83: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Other interesting results from BES and CLEO-c
![Page 84: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Possible new N*(2050) at BES II
N*(1440)?
N*(1520)
N*(1535)N*(1650)
N*(1675)
N*(1680)
?
MeV
MeVM
4012175
32065 1530
npJ /
BES IIPreliminary
![Page 85: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
decays and 12% rule test
Puzzle:Qh<<12%
VP• Most channels BRs are consistent.
• BES BR() > CLEO by ~ 3, because PWA takes into acount the interference.
• BR(K*0K0) are deviated
%12)/(
)'(
)/(
)'(
eeJB
eeB
XJB
XBQh
![Page 86: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
CLEO-c
hQ
![Page 87: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Summary
Pentaquarks need confirmation, then we need to answer:• The exotic production mechanism of pentaquarks.• Why the widths are so narrow?• What are their JP ?
One new decay mode X(3872) *J/ is observed at Belle. We still need to:
• Find more decay modes of X(3872)
• Understand its nature: a charmonium or molecular state?
DsJ(2632) needs confirmation, then we need to understand its width and unusual decay properties, also its unusual production mechanism.
![Page 88: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
A unique very narrow threshold enhancement is observed in decays at BES II:• It is not observed in elastic cross section
it cannot be explained by FSI.
• It is obviously different from the structure observed in B decays and it cannot be explained by fragmentation.
We need to understand the nature of the strong anomalous baryon-antibaryon, baryon-meson threshold enhancements in J/ decays: multiquark states or other dynamical mechanism ? (keeping in mind that there are no strong threshold enhancements in many cases)
We need to understand the Scalar Puzzle: why many scalar mesons behave differently in the production and decay properties? We also need to answer: How will the new observed f0(1790) change the scalar glueball picture?
pp
ppppJ /
![Page 89: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
No matter what are the interpretations for the recent new surprising observations, these discoveries certainly open a new window for understanding the strong interaction and hadron spectroscopy.
We need to have a global picture if there are new forms of hadrons beyond the naïve quark model —— any pentaquark, tetraquark, molecular state or other multiquark states cannot stay alone !
A lot of opportunities for BES III and other experiments working on hadron spectroscopy !!!
Prospects
![Page 90: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
谢 谢!Thank You!
![Page 91: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
ZEUS
No evidence for Ξ--(1862), Ξ0(1862) in deep inelastic scattering data.
)1530(0
![Page 92: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
WA89
Ξ- -(1862) was searched for with 676000 Ξ- candidates at WA89.
No evidence observed.
)( M
015.0)())1530((
))1862((0
BR
@ 99.9% C.L.
hep-ex/0405042
![Page 93: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
SPHINX
SPHINX systematically searched for Θ+(1540) in many final states.
No evidence was
observed.
RΛ*(1520) <0.02 @ 90 %CL
Cross Section Limit vs. M(NK)
LS KpK )(
SKnK )(
SS KpK )(
SL KpK )(
NKNp 0
hep-ex/0407026
![Page 94: New Results on Hadron Spectroscopy (Experimental Review) Shan JIN Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences jins@mail.ihep.ac.cn.](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012916/56649f215503460f94c394f0/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
MARK-III & DM2 Results
Threshold enhancement
pp/J
Claimed inPhys. Rep. 174(1989) 67-227
Too small statistics to draw any conclusion on the threshold enhancement,
e.g., cannot exclude known particles such as (1760)
MARK-III
DM2
ppM