PostTV

Politics

Opinions

Local

Sports

National

World

Business

Tech

Lifestyle

Entertainment

Classifieds

Jobs

Real Estate

Events

Rentals

Cars

WP BrandConnect

Newsletters & Alerts

washingtonpost.com

1996-2015 The Washington Post

Help and Contact Us

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Submissions and Discussion Policy

RSS Terms of Service

Ad Choices

The Washington Post

Iran: The high-stakes issue that divides Netanyahu and Obama

Subscribe

Politics

Iran: The high-stakes issue that divides Netanyahu and Obama

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google Plus Share via Email More Options

Resize Text Print Article Comments

President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu huddle during their joint news

conference in Jerusalem on March 20, 2013. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)

By Anne Gearan March 2 at 8:03 PM

The deep rift between the U.S. and Israeli governments has been growing steadily for some time, and

not just because President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dont like one

another.

The split, laid bare by Netanyahus planned address to Congress on Tuesday, happened because of one

thing: Iran.

For Obama, Iran represents the potential to redeem a foreign policy ethos dented by six years in the

tough trenches of governing.

If he strikes a deal to roll back Irans feared nuclear program, Obama could make good on a now-hazy

campaign promise to productively extend a hand of peace to dictators. He might end more than three

decades of enmity between two great powers with much in common. He might be the American

president to go to Tehran the way Nixon went to China.

For Netanyahu, Iran is more than a well-armed enemy at his Mideast doorstep. Its the obsession of

Netanyahus political life, the alarm he has sounded for decades, his raison detre, his white whale.

VIEW GRAPHIC

Graphic: Iran's potential nuclear capability

I plan to speak about an Iranian regime that is threatening to destroy Israel, thats devouring country

after country in the Middle East, thats exporting terror throughout the world and that is developing, as

we speak, the capacity to make nuclear weapons, Netanyahu said Monday. Lots of them.

Obama began working to improve U.S. relations with Iran almost from the dawn of his administration.

He is now weeks away from the prospect of a historic deal to hobble Irans nuclear program, which the

White House argues would make the world, and especially Netanyahus neighborhood, a lot safer than it

is now.

Netanyahu, whose second term as prime minister began shortly after Obama took office in 2009, insists

that a negotiated agreement with Iran is a fools errand.

For the U.S.-educated Israeli leader, any deal that lets Iran retain its ability to make nuclear fuel

endangers Israel. And he says that the United States and other world powers negotiating the deal are

giving away the store by easing economic sanctions without an airtight guarantee that Iran can never

build a bomb.

His view finds many supporters in Congress, from both American political parties. The speech, to be

delivered over the objections of a White House that was not told of the invitation, is a rallying cry to

members of Congress to sunder the deal by piling on more sanctions.

The purpose of my address to Congress tomorrow is to speak up about a potential deal with Iran that

could threaten the survival of Israel, Netanyahu told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee on

Monday.

Obama is not addressing AIPAC this year. Neither is Vice President Biden, or Secretary of State John F.

Kerry.

Israels Netanyahu has respect for Obama(1:33)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted Monday that despite recent differences with the

Obama administration over Iran the alliance between his country and the Unites States is stronger than

ever. (AP)

Obama will not receive Netanyahu at the White House. The president didnt watch Netanyahus warm-

up speech to AIPAC on Monday, White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters.

As the prime minister of Israel, he can set his own schedule, Earnest said. And he gets to take the

actions that he believes are consistent with his own objectives, whatever they may be.

The invitation to address Congress, however, violated years of protocol in which foreign leaders speak at

the behest of both Congress and the sitting president.

As prime minister of Israel, I have a moral obligation to speak up in the face of these dangers while

theres still time to avert them, Netanyahu said Monday.

Netanyahu used his AIPAC appearance to warn that Iran is already the foremost state sponsor of

terrorism in the world, a charge U.S. officials dont make as often as they used to.

Iran envelops the entire world with its tentacles of terror. This is what Iran is doing now without

nuclear weapons. Imagine what Iran would do with nuclear weapons, Netanyahu said. And this same

Iran vows to annihilate Israel. If it develops nuclear weapons, it would have the means to achieve that

goal. We must not let that happen.

He reminded his audience that Israel is a small democracy, an outpost of decency and progressive mores

in a dark, and savage, and desperate Middle East.

He invoked the persecution of Jews over millennia, and he invoked the Holocaust.

The days when the Jewish people are passive in the face of threats to annihilate us, those days are

over, Netanyahu thundered.

And this was supposed to be the boring speech, the one that the famously theatrical Israeli leader would

use to temper the fireworks to come on Tuesday.

The congressional speech amounts to a writing-off of Netanyahus already abysmal personal relationship

with Obama, with nearly two years to go until a new U.S. president takes over. Netanyahu faces a tight

reelection contest this month but is considered likely to retain the prime ministers office.

Obama considers Netanyahu a bully and a showboat, U.S. and Israeli officials said in interviews ahead of

the speech.

Netanyahu considers Obama callow and bloodless, those officials said. The Israeli regarded Obamas first

election as a fluke and assumed it could not be repeated, he told associates ahead of Obamas 2012

reelection.

Stuck with one another, the two leaders have mostly kept up appearances for the sake of a national

alliance that both vow cannot be broken. Iran has been the chief irritant since 2013, with the White

House fuming at what it saw as Netanyahus open attempt to sink a deal it has painstakingly nurtured.

The international talks face an end-of-March deadline.

Both Netanyahu and U.S. officials stressed Monday that the U.S.-Israel bond will survive.

Netanyahu ticked off several past examples of tension, including the suspension of American arms

transfers over the 1981 Israeli military strike that destroyed an Iraqi nuclear reactor.

Netanyahu didnt mention then-Secretary of State James A. Bakers famous 1990 put-down, when he

told Congress that Israel should call us when youre serious about peace. Baker then read out the

number of the White House switchboard.

None of the past splits were permanent, Netanyahu said.

Were like a family. Were practically mishpocha, he said, using a Yiddish word for a family network or

clan.

Now, disagreements in the family are always uncomfortable, but we must always remember that we

are family.

Now that the dirty laundry is flapping, U.S. officials were cordial Monday.

We believe firmly that Israels security and the U.S.-Israeli partnership transcends politics and always

will, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, told the AIPAC audience.

Power defended the Obama administrations approach to negotiation with Iran and pledged anew that

the United States wont allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. She reassured the audience that

American military force remains an option if diplomacy fails.

Maybe the president has made this point so often that it isnt heard in the same way anymore, but we

have to keep repeating it, Power said.

Talks, no talks, agreement, no agreement, the United States will take whatever steps are necessary to

protect our national security and that of our closest allies, she said.

We believe diplomacy is the preferred route to secure our shared aim. But if diplomacy should fail, we

know the stakes of a nuclear-armed Iran as well as everyone here. We will not let it happen.

Anne Gearan is a national politics correspondent for The Washington Post.

SHARE ON FACEBOOK

SHARE ON TWITTER

COMMENTS

Get Politics

Free daily updates delivered just for you.

Most Read Politics

1

Hacked emails indicate that Hillary Clinton used a domain registered the day of her Senate hearings

2

Hillary Clinton used private e-mail for government business at State Dept.

3

Portrait artist says he painted Lewinsky reference in Bill Clinton's official painting

4

These states are poised to allow people to carry hidden guns around without a permit

5

Netanyahu says no 'disrespect' meant to Obama

The Most Popular All Over

The Dodo

12 Pets Who Are Totally You And Your Sibling

The Baltimore Sun

Ray Rice's wrongful termination grievance against Ravens was settled for $1.588 million

The Atlantic

A Brewing Problem

Our Online Games

Play right from this page

sudoku

Sudoku

Genre(s): Strategy

Put on your Sudoku hat and get ready for a challenging Sudoku puzzle!

daily-crossword

Daily Crossword

Genre(s): Word

Same fun of crosswords but online!

masque-just-words

Just Words

Genre(s): Word

Get ready to be wowed with wonderful word fun!

html5-trizzle

Trizzle

Genre(s): Strategy

Experience the joy of Trizzle!

washingtonpost.com

1996-2015 The Washington Post

Help and Contact Us

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Submissions and Discussion Policy

RSS Terms of Service

Ad Choices