New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to...

76
Aligning Vision with Design High School Design Committee St. Cloud Area School District 07.28.15

Transcript of New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to...

Page 1: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Aligning Vision with Design

High School Design

Committee

St. Cloud Area School District

07.28.15

Page 2: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

PURPOSE To carry forward the clear and

compelling vision of the future

for St. Cloud Area High

School learners by aligning

the educational programs

and physical design of

facilities with this vision.

Page 3: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

We see inviting, student-centered designs that integrate

environ-mental, community and technological resources to

cultivate a love of learning in all students. By celebrating

beauty, function and sustainability, we build on a tradition of

excellence that serves as a source of pride for students, staff

and the community.

SHARED FACILITY VISION

• Schools foster global preparedness, holistic development

and engagement through multiple modes of learning.

• Students and staff strive for success within equitable,

inclusive and collaborative settings.

• Students engage in theoretical and applied learning

settings that build bridges between subjects, classrooms,

student groups and the community.

Page 4: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

High School Design Committee:

• Representative group with responsibility to the whole.

• Provides direction that will ensure the success of both projects.

• Ensures equity and identifies issues that may need further input from

the Steering Committee.

• Will weigh in on design direction as it relates to teaching and learning,

the social health of students, and the needs of all adults.

• Identifies opportunities for innovation and collaboration both within the

schools and in the greater community.

• Are asked to think big picture and should be able to address issues

outside of their personal realm.

• Are asked to be advocates and communicators for the project and to

other staff members and the community.

Page 5: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

DE

CIS

ION

S

Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and

Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to

the High School Design Committee for specific area

programs.

High School Design Committee – Representative

Group from both High Schools and the community with

responsibility to the whole, not just their specific area.

Big picture thinking; Makes recommendations to

Steering.

Steering Committee – Makes

recommendations to School Board.

School Board – Makes

final project decisions.

Page 6: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

KICK-OFF

VISIONING

WORKSHOP

St. Cloud High School Design Committee

Meeting #1… 6/16 - Kick-off

Meeting #2…6/30

CTE, Art, Athletics,

Music/Performance

Meeting #3…Today

What are others doing?

Science, Special Ed, General

Learning, Media Commons

Meeting #4…August 12th Sharing out from Programming

Sub-Groups

Page 7: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

We are here.

Page 8: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

LIV

E

L

EA

RN

W

OR

SH

IP

W

OR

K

P

LA

N P

LA

Y

Context and

Precedents

Where

We’ve Been

Group Work

NEW COUNTRY Homework

Discussion

Next Steps/

Homework AGENDA

Page 9: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

LIV

E

L

EA

RN

W

OR

SH

IP

W

OR

K

P

LA

N P

LA

Y

Context and

Precedents

Group Work

NEW COUNTRY

Next Steps/

Homework

AGENDA Homework

Discussion

Where

We’ve Been

Page 10: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

FORCES OF CHANGE:

Mindset to address

these changes:

• Curiosity

• Patience

• Respect

• Creating ownership

• Challenge tradition

• Concern for

unknown

• Technology

• Innovation

• Personalization

• Accessibility

• Diversity

• Diverse student needs

• Mobile society

• Public perception

• Ability to teach- learn, unlearn, re-

learn

• Problem solvers that are creative

• Team-work environment

Page 11: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

PRECONCEPTIONS:

{i.e. limiting beliefs}

• Perceptions, e.g.

“Why weren’t schools maintained?”

“Better school on one side than the other”

“Things don’t have to be grandiose--it was good

enough for me”

• Concern for effect of new school on north side

• What will happen to the Tech area? Neighborhood,

school, transportation…

• Where will DAO be? Will DAO take space from

students?

Personal and/or institutional

beliefs that might prevent or

limit you in facing the

challenges presented by these

forces

Page 12: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

PRECONCEPTIONS: Continued…. • Fear that teacher collaboration space will result in

“teaching from a cart”, loss of room ownership

• Class or classroom sizes too big, lose 1:1 help

• Can we afford to keep technology up to date?

• Change may not be good

• Access to school

• Not enough money to do everything

• Behavioral issues between schools

• School design

Page 13: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Programming Sub-Groups:

Offices: Admin, Counseling/Guidance, Nurse

PE/Athletics

• Kitchen/Dining

Maintenance/Receiving/Custodial

• General Learning/Staff Collaboration

• Science

Art/Video/Graphics

• Music/Performance

• Media Commons

• Special Education

Studios/Labs: CTE/STEM/PLTW/Learning

Partnerships/FACS

- indicates first 1 or 2 meetings held

UP

DA

TE

Page 14: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

OFFICES • Main Office, Guidance, Nurse are together

• Visitors enter through Office during day

• Activities Director separate (by Door 7 at Apollo)

UP

DA

TE

Page 15: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

OFFICES U

PD

AT

E

Page 16: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

OFFICES U

PD

AT

E

Activities Office

Page 17: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

CUSTODIAL AREAS

• Distributed custodial closets, sufficiently sized

• Ease of maintenance with regard to building and

site

• Storage

• Variety of sizes

• Locate specific needs throughout building

(tables, risers, equipment, attic stock, etc.)

• “Home Base” for custodial staff

• Receiving dock and trash/recycling processes

• Grounds maintenance shop and vehicle storage on

site

UP

DA

TE

Page 18: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

REFLECTIONS

Page 19: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

LIV

E

L

EA

RN

W

OR

SH

IP

W

OR

K

P

LA

N P

LA

Y

Context and

Precedents

Group Work

Where

We’ve Been

NEW COUNTRY

Next Steps/

Homework

AGENDA Homework

Discussion

Page 20: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

REFLECTIONS

The Third Teacher (Video)

Page 21: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

2. Find an image of educational

Innovation for one or more of

the following:

General Learning, Special Ed, Science,

Media/Technology Resource Area

Homework

Page 22: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design
Page 23: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design
Page 24: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design
Page 25: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design
Page 26: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design
Page 27: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design
Page 28: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

REFLECTIONS

Page 29: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

LIV

E

L

EA

RN

W

OR

SH

IP

W

OR

K

P

LA

N P

LA

Y

Group Work

Where

We’ve Been

NEW COUNTRY

Next Steps/

Homework

AGENDA Homework

Discussion

Context and

Precedents

Page 30: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

PROGRAM REVIEW

What’s Included?

Page 31: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

• Aligned with District’s Strategic Plan

• This is about transformation

• Focused on the future (21st Century

Learning)

• Focused on student success

• Technology rich

• Equitable access to programs

• Full high school activities/athletic

experience

• This is about 2 equitable high schools

• Plan for a design capacity of up to 1,800

students for each HS (approx. 360,000 sf)

• No loss of instructional time

DESIGN

PARAMETERS

Page 32: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

LEARNING COMMUNITY

PARAMETERS Learning Communities need to have:

• Flexible Spaces

• Staff Collaboration

• Shared Ownership of Space

• Variety of Space

• Adaptable Spaces

• Collegiate Atmosphere

• Integrated Specialized Spaces

Page 33: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Learning Communities

• 56 general learning, classroom equivalents/teaching stations @ 900 sf

• 10 Science specialized lab spaces @ 1,800 sf

• 16 medium group spaces for 10 -15 students @ 400 sf

• 16 small group spaces for 2 – 6 students @ 200 sf

• Special Ed – self contained spaces for level III learners and life skills

• Collaborative learning space (large group, independent learning)

• Staff collaboration space

• Teaching and learning material storage

Approximately 110,000 sf or 30% of the building and 70 teaching

stations

Page 34: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Science

• 10 Teaching stations specialized for Science - (+/- 16,000

sf)

• Associated storage-prep (+/- 2,000 sf)

• Integrated with Learning Communities

Page 35: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Special Education

Levels I & II integrated into the Learning Communities, with

access to Small and Medium Group rooms.

Level III settings (also integrated) - ASD/DCD and EBD:

• Paired home-base spaces for Level III –(+/- 4,800sf):

DCD/ASD with Life Skills, and two EBD.

• Associated storage, toilets, staff collaboration

• Ideally on first level near a pick-up/drop-off

Page 36: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Common/Shared Spaces

• Media Commons

• Video production

• Graphics Lab

• Commons/Dining/Kitchen

Page 37: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

What are others

doing?

Page 38: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

General learning

Page 39: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

FAIR School Downtown Minneapolis, MN

Page 40: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Alexandria Area High School Alexandria Public Schools, Alexandria MN

Page 41: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Alexandria Area High School Alexandria Public Schools, Alexandria MN

Page 42: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Alexandria Area High School Alexandria Public Schools, Alexandria MN

Page 43: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Alexandria Area High School Alexandria Public Schools, Alexandria MN

Page 44: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Alexandria Area High School Alexandria Public Schools, Alexandria MN

Page 45: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Alexandria Area High School Alexandria Public Schools, Alexandria MN

Page 46: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Alexandria Area High School Alexandria Public Schools, Alexandria MN

Page 47: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Science

Page 48: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design
Page 49: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Minnehaha Academy Minneapolis, MN

Page 50: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Minnehaha Academy Minneapolis, MN

Page 51: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Johnson High School Saint Paul Public Schools. St. Paul, MN

Page 52: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Johnson High School Saint Paul Public Schools. St. Paul, MN

Page 53: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Media Commons

Page 54: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

New High School Campus: Center for Advanced Professional Studies & Roosevelt

HS Natrona County School District, Casper WY

Page 55: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Alexandria Area High School Alexandria Public Schools, Alexandria MN

Page 56: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Alexandria Area High School Alexandria Public Schools, Alexandria MN

Page 57: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Hadley School Glen Ellyn School District - FGM Architects

Page 58: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Special Education

Page 59: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Disney Sensory Room (above), UC Davis MIND Instititute > Special Education Space

Page 60: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

REFLECTIONS

Page 61: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

LIV

E

L

EA

RN

W

OR

SH

IP

W

OR

K

P

LA

N P

LA

Y

Context and

Precedents

Where

We’ve Been

NEW COUNTRY Homework

Discussion

Next Steps/

Homework AGENDA Group Work

Page 62: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

General Learning, Special Ed, Science,

Media/Technology Resource Area

• Organization: What relationships should be

promoted? How integrate disciplines?

• Partnerships: Influence on space?

• Influence of technology?

Page 63: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

We want all our learners to be successful This means: We need to create flexible, adaptable environments that support a

variety of learning styles

We want our learners to feel safe and have a sense of

community both in and out of the school environment This means: We need to create a space for community within the school and for

students in the community

We want our learners to be competitive in the world This means: We need to create a world class education that supports both

college and career readiness

We want our learners to be equitably connected to resources This means: We need a technology rich environment that promotes learning

anytime, anyplace

We want our learners to have hands-on, relevant learning experiences This means: We need to support career technical, business, and STEAM

education through appropriate partnerships and space

Page 64: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

We want our learners to understand that learning is integrated

and not discipline specific This means: We need to break down traditional silos between subjects and

promote teacher collaboration

We want our learners to be supported by staff that work collaboratively to promote best practices This means: we need to support our staff through professional development and

create professional work space for collaboration

We want our learners to have opportunities throughout the community This means: we will work to support partnerships with businesses and high ed

institutions in the St. Cloud area

We want our learners to have a completed high school experience rich with opportunities beyond traditional academics This means: We need to support the arts, activities and athletics

We want our learners to feel welcomed into our schools This means: Our schools need to address the physical needs of students by

being safe, comfortable, and aesthetically welcoming with lots of daylight

Page 65: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

Share back Any overlaps?

Page 66: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

LIV

E

L

EA

RN

W

OR

SH

IP

W

OR

K P

LA

N

P

LA

Y

Context and

Precedents

Where

We’ve Been

NEW COUNTRY Homework

Discussion

AGENDA Group Work to

Guide

Next Steps/

Homework

Page 67: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

No Homework!

Page 68: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

KICK-OFF

VISIONING

WORKSHOP

Next Steps:

Meeting #4…August 12th

What are some results coming out of

the programming discussions?

Updates to site and building

diagrams for discussion

THANKS!

Page 69: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

balanced world beautiful places

Page 70: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

APOLLO HIGH SCHOOL

Page 71: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

APOLLO HIGH

SCHOOL PROPOSED

SITE PLAN

Page 72: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design
Page 73: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

NEW HIGH SCHOOL

Page 74: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

NEW HIGH SCHOOL

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

Page 75: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

NEW HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL 1 2 STORY

Page 76: New High School Design Committee · 2015. 8. 5. · DECISIONS Programming Sub-Groups (specific to New and Apollo) – small groups that make recommendations to the High School Design

NEW HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL 2 2 STORY NEW HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL 1 2 STORY