Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 60 (1): 97–111, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2012.0127

New fossil remains from the Pliocene Koetoi Formation of northern Japan provide insights into growth rates and the vertebral evolution of porpoises

MIZUKI MURAKAMI, CHIEKO SHIMADA, YOSHINORI HIKIDA, and HIROMICHI HIRANO

Murakami, M., Shimada, C., Hikida, Y., and Hirano, H. 2015. New fossil remains from the Pliocene Koetoi Formation of northern Japan provide insights into growth rates and the vertebral evolution of porpoises. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 60 (1): 97–111.

Extant porpoises (Phocoenidae) are odontocetes characterized by their small size, short and wide rostrum, late (or absent) completion of epiphyseal ankylosis in the vertebral column (= physical maturity), and short life cycles, all of which are thought to have resulted from progenetic evolution. We describe a small fossil phocoenid from the lower Pliocene Koetoi Formation of Hokkaido (northern Japan), preserving a small, narrow rostrum, as well as anteroposteriorly elon-gate thoracic and lumbar vertebral centra with completely fused epiphyses. Physical maturity in this specimen occurred significantly earlier than in extant phocoenids, as shown by dental data indicating that the specimen died at only four years of age. The difference between the present material and extant porpoises may be attributable to different growth rates during ontogeny. The long centra and caudally inclined neural spines of the specimen from Hokkaido are primitive characters among phocoenids. By contrast, the great height of its neural spines is highly derived, even among extant species, and suggestive of a fast swimmer. In terms of its vertebral morphology, the new specimen falls within a morpho-logical continuum defined by the archaic Numataphocoena yamashitai and the highly derived vertebral morphology of Phocoenoides dalli. Phocoenid vertebral evolution has been complex and frequently convergent, as opposed to stepwise and unidirectional. The different vertebral morphologies of the new specimen and the contemporaneous extinct taxa Numataphocoena and Piscolithax longirostris indicate that they were adapted to different environments.

Key words: Mammalia, Phocoenidae, age estimation, growth rate, vertebral evolution, Pliocene, Japan.

Mizuki Murakami [mizuki-m@aoni.waseda.jp], Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, Nishiwaseda 1-6-1, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8050, Japan.Chieko Shimada [c-shimada@aist.go.jp], Mineral Industry Museum, Akita University, 28-2 Tegata-Osawa, Akita 010-8502, Japan; Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba 305-8567, Japan.Yoshinori Hikida [nmhikida@coral.ocn.ne.jp], Nakagawa Museum of Natural History, 28-9, Yasukawa, Nakagawa-cho, Hokkaido 098-2626, Japan.Hiromichi Hirano, Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Waseda Uni-versity, Tokyo, Japan (passed away on 5 May 2014).

Received 5 November 2012, accepted 9 August 2013, available online 16 August 2013.

Copyright © 2015 M. Murakami et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

IntroductionThe osteology and functional morphology of the cetacean vertebral column has been studied in some detail (e.g., Long et al. 1997; Buchholtz 1998, 2001; Buchholtz and Schur 2004; Buchholtz et al. 2005). Living cetaceans differ from most other mammals in having a relatively short neck and torso (sensu Buchholtz 2001), flattened vertebral faces, and a relatively large number of vertebrae in the torso. Taken together, these traits reduce the flexibility of the column,

and give rise to a more hydrodynamic overall body shape and enhanced swimming speed (Buchholtz 2001). In addi-tion, some taxa, including delphinids and phocoenids, have evolved a comparatively elongate caudal tail stock. Buch-holtz and Schur (2004) concluded that characters concerned with enhanced swimming speed in delphinids evolved step-wise. However, the topology of the tree they used has since been contradicted by most recent molecular phylogenies (e.g., McGowen et al. 2009), suggesting that at least some of these traits likely evolved more than once (vertebral count,

98 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 60 (1), 2015

regional absence of torso metapophyses, and inclination of neural arch and spines in torsos).

Phocoenids offer an informative case study of vertebral evolution, owing to their relatively well-understood phylogeny and rich fossil record, with 16 extinct species from the period spanning the late Miocene–Pliocene. However, there are just three taxa for which the vertebral column has been described in detail: Piscolithax longirostris Muizon, 1983, P. aenigmati-cus (Pilleri and Siber, 1989), and Numataphocoena yamashitai Ichishima and Kimura, 2000. Vertebrae of Semirostrum cerut-tii Racicot, Deméré, Beatty, and Boessenecker, 2014 are brief-ly described after acceptance of this paper. Here, we describe a small fossil phocoenid (NMV-5) from the lower Pliocene Koetoi Formation of Hokkaido (northern Japan) preserving 7 cervical, 8 thoracic, and 3 lumbar vertebrae (Table 1), and discuss its implications for our understanding of the evolution of the vertebral column in porpoises.

Institutional abbreviations.—LACM, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, California, USA; NFL, Numata Fossil Laboratory, Numata, Japan; MNHN, Museúm Nation-al d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; NHMUK, Natural His-tory Museum, London; NMV, Nakagawa Museum of Natural History, Nakagawa, Japan; NMNS, National Museum of Na-ture and Science, Tokyo, Japan; SMNK, Staatliche Museum für Naturkunde, Karlsruhe, Germany; USNM, United States National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institu-tion, Washington DC, USA.

Other abbreviations.—CH, dorsoventral height of the an-terior articular surface of the centrum; CL, anteroposterior length of the centrum. Our anatomical terminology follows Mead and Fordyce (2009).

Geological settingThe present material was recovered from the Koetoi For-mation, which is the most fossiliferous of a series of Neo-gene sediments exposed in the Tempoku Basin of Hokkaido, northern Japan (Fig. 1). The latter is the northernmost of a series of north-south running basins distributed throughout central Hokkaido (Hoyanagi et al. 1986; Fukusawa et al. 1992; Sagayama and Hoyanagi 1993), and has yielded a considerable number of marine vertebrate fossils (Tomida and Kohno 1992; Uyeno 1992; Shimada et al. 1998; Kohno et al. 2002; Ichishima et al. 2006; Murakami et al. 2012a, b).

The Koetoi Formation is principally composed of diato-maceous pebbly mudstone resting on basal tuffaceous mud-stone (Fukusawa 1985), and is considered to be a shelf deposit (Fukusawa et al. 1992). The Koetoi Formation conformably overlies the Wakkanai Formation, and is in turn conformably overlain by the Yuchi Formation. However, the boundaries between these formations are time-transgressive throughout of the basin. Chronologically, the Koetoi Formation has been estimated based on diatom biochronology, and ranges from

the Thalassionema hirosakiensis s.l. Zone (Fukusawa 1985), corresponding to the Thalassionema schraderi Zone (8.5–7.6 Ma) of Yanagisawa and Akiba (1998), to about 2.3 Ma, as indicated by the first appearance of Neodenticula seminae and fission-track dating (Yasue et al. 2006).

The precise stratigraphic horizon which yielded NMV-5 is uncertain, since the latter was found in a floating calcar-eous concretion. However, diatoms collected from the con-cretion (Shimada et al. 1998) correlate with the T. oestrupii Subzone (5.5–3.5/3.9 Ma; Yanagisawa and Akiba 1998) and, together with the absence of Actinocyclus oculatus (first oc-curring at 4 Ma), suggest an early Pliocene (5.5–4.0 Ma) age for the material described here.

Material and methodsAge of the individual.—The individual age of extant (e.g., Perrin and Myrick 1980) and extinct odontocetes (Myrick 1979; Lambert et al. 2008) is frequently assessed by count-ing annually accumulated growth layer groups apparent in the dentine of the teeth (International Whaling Commission 1969; Gurevich et al. 1980). We used this method to deter-mine the age at which NMV-5 died, based on the decalcifica-tion and staining technique (e.g., Pierce and Kajimura 1980; Kasuya 1983). For this purpose, we first coated the tooth with epoxy resin (SpeciFix-40; Struers Inc.), owing to its small size (1.25 mm in width). The tooth was then polished with abrasives until the longitudinal half section (buccal–labial section) was exposed. The latter was then glued to an acryl slide using the instant glue Aron alpha (Toagosei Inc.). Next, we produced a thin section of the tooth using a Minitom precision cut-off machine (Struers Inc.), and polished the

NMV-5

Teshio River

Teshio Town

Kokkuneppu R

iverNakagawa Town

1000 km

140 E45 N

JAPAN

locality

200 km

Hokkaido

5 km

A

B

CHokkaido

Fig. 1. The locality of a small porpoise NMV-5. A. The Japanese islands. B. The locality of NMV-5. C. Detailed locality of NMV-5 near the Tesh-ionakagawa area.

MURAKAMI ET AL.—PLIOCENE PORPOISE FROM JAPAN 99

section with an abrasive (#6000) under an optical microscope down to a thickness of 50 μm. Finally, we polished the thin section with a 1 μm-diamond-coated abrasive.

The thin section of the tooth was decalcified in a 5% formic acid bath for 24 hours, following which it was rinsed in running water, and stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Merck KGaA) for 30 minutes. The thin section was then rinsed again in running water, and mounted with Entellan Neu (Merck KGaA). The growth layers of the dentine were counted under a microscope (Nikon SMZ 645 and Nikon Labophoto2-Pol) using transmitted light at a magnification of 7-90x and 40-1000x. In order to make our age determi-nation as accurate as possible, three people independently counted the number of the dentinal growth layers three times. The mean of those nine counts was then taken as the number of annual rings of the specimen.

Vertebral evolution in Phocoenidae.—Odontocete locomo-tion is dependent on the vertical displacement and oscillation of the peduncle and fluke (e.g., Slijper 1961; Fish and Hui 1991), and thus the structure of the vertebral column. Ver-tebral modifications characterising odontocetes include an increase in the rigidity of the pre-peduncle portion of the col-umn, as well as the flexibility of the peduncle and fluke (Long et al. 1997; Buchholtz and Schur 2004). This is achieved through (i) the reduction of the relative centrum length of the cervicals, thoracic, and anterior lumbar vertebrae; (ii) flattened central faces; (iii) increased vertebral counts; and (iv) comparatively elongated centra in the tail stock region (Slijper 1961; Buchholtz 2001; Buchholtz and Schur 2004).

In order to better understand the origins of the vertebral patterns characterising phocoenids, we traced the evolution of 16 characters related to vertebral evolution (Tables 2, 3) on a phylogenetic tree, using the parsimony algorithm im-plemented in Mesquite Version 2.73 (Maddison and Maddi-son 2010). The phylogenetic tree was based on a reanalysis of a slightly modified version of the comprehensive data matrix (72 ingroup taxa, 282 characters) of Murakami et al. (2012b), with characters 220, 221, 222, 224, and 227 excluded to avoid circular reasoning (Felsenstein 1985). The cladistic analysis was performed in PAUP 4.0 b10 (Swof-ford 1998), using Georgiacetus Hulbert, Petkewich, Bish-op, Burkry, and Aleshire, 1998 and Zygorhiza True, 1908 as outgroups (the complete character list and data matrix are provided in the Supplementary Online Material, SOM available at http://app.pan.pl/SOM/app60-Murakami_etal_SOM.pdf). All of the characters were treated as unweight-ed and unordered, and were analysed using 100 random stepwise-addition replicates and tree bisection reconnection (TBR) branch swapping, saving 30 trees per replicate. We did not include Piscolithax aenigmaticus, NMV-5, and Nu-mataphocoena yamashitai, because specimens were either unavailable or fragmentary, generating too much polytomy to trace the characters. The cladistic analysis resulted in 121 most parsimonious trees of 1676 steps (Fig. 5), giving rise to a strict consensus tree identical to that of Murakami et al.

(2012b), except for the branches within Delphinidae. For the purpose of tracing traits related to swimming ability among phocoenids, we used Delphinapterus leucas Pallas, 1776 as outgroup. Vertebral counts for extant species were based on Brownell (1975, 1983), Brownell and Praderi (1984), Gas-kin et al. (1974), Heyning and Dahlheim (1988), Jefferson (1988), Jefferson and Hung (2004), Perrin (2001), Stacey et al. (1994), Stewart and Stewart (1989), West et al. (2011).

Systematic palaeontologyOrder Cetacea Brisson, 1762Odontoceti Flower, 1867Superfamily Delphinoidea Gray, 1821Family Phocoenidae Gray, 1825Phocoenidae gen. et sp. indet.Figs. 2–4.

Material.—NMV-5, a partial rostrum and mandible, all cer-vicals, eight thoracic and three lumbar vertebrae, and several incomplete ribs, from a small, unnamed tributary valley of the Kokuneppu River located in the Sengen district, Teshio, Hokkaido, Japan (44°49′45 N, 141°59′26 E; Fig. 1); Koetoi Formation, early Pliocene (5.5–4.0 Ma).

DescriptionSkull

Rostrum.—The relatively well-preserved rostrum (length: 147 mm; Fig. 2A–D), missing its distalmost 10–20 mm in-cluding the anteriormost alveolus (Fig. 2B, C), is all that remains of the skull. The greatest width of the maxillae is approximately 59+ mm (Fig. 2C), thus resembling the small extant phocoenids Neophocaena phocaeniodes and Phocoe-na phocoena in size.Premaxilla.—The premaxilla is slender, although it should be noted that some of the medial portion of the proximal end of the premaxilla is missing. Distally, the premaxilla slopes steeply towards the lateral border of the rostrum (Fig. 2D). As in most phocoenids, the mesorostral groove is moderately open, with the medial edges of both premaxillae being large-ly parallel. The suture uniting the premaxilla and maxilla is distinct along the entire rostrum.Maxilla.—In dorsal view, the maxilla steeply slopes away laterally towards its anterior end (Fig. 2A, D). The maxillary flange is flat and narrow. As in Piscolithax longirostris, the anteriormost dorsal infraorbital foramen is located directly ad-jacent to the premaxilla. In lateral view, the maxilla is slightly curved ventrally (Fig. 2B). The ventral surface of the maxilla is transversely concave (Fig. 2D), and bears a distinct palatine sulcus and greater palatine foramen in its proximal portion (Fig. 2C). The tooth rows are clearly separated, moderately divergent posteriorly, and shortened (as in other phocoenids),

100 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 60 (1), 2015

with the posteriormost alveolus located 32 mm anterior to the anterior edge of the palatine. 21 alveoli (length of tooth row = 88 mm) are preserved on the left side, and 20 (length of tooth row = 86 mm) on the right, with an average alveolus diameter of 2.5 mm. Six teeth lacking crowns are preserved in situ.Vomer.—In ventral view, the vomer is narrowly exposed be-tween the premaxillae, unlike in all other phocoenids except Piscolithax longirostris.Palatine.—Only the anteriormost portions of the palatines are preserved (Fig. 2C), making accurate description impossible.Mandible.—The left mandible is missing its anteriormost

10–20 mm and the portion posterior to the anterior border of the mandibular foramen. By contrast, only a 40 mm fragment remains of the right mandible (Fig. 2E, F). The mandibular symphysis is at least 15 mm long, and connects both man-dibles at an angle of 35°. 20 alveoli are preserved in the left mandible (length of tooth row = 77 mm) and 12 in the right, with an average alveolus diameter of 1.9 mm.Teeth.—Two small (< 3.5 mm long), isolated teeth with spat-ulate crowns and circular roots (1 mm in diameter) were pre-served near the maxillae (Fig. 3A–D). The crowns measure 1 mm buccolingually and 1.25 mm anteroposteriorly, and are covered by smooth enamel with no accessory cusps or ornamentation.

Postcranial skeletonCervical vertebrae.—The seven cervical vertebrae are un-fused and anteroposteriorly compressed, and resemble other extinct phocoenids in their overall morphology (Fig. 4A–D, Table 1). Weathering has resulted in the loss of most of the neural arches, as well as the erosion of the anterior face of the atlas (Fig. 4C). The ventral transverse process of the atlas is short and moderately robust, and there is no dorsal transverse process. The pedicle of the neural arch of the atlas is attached to the axis. The latter (Fig. 4D) has lost most of its neural arch and transverse processes, but preserves two deep fossae on the dorsal face of the vertebral body, which may represent attachments sites for the dorsal longitudinal ligament.

5 cm

premaxilla

premaxilla

premaxilla

palatal sulcus

palatine

maxilladorsal infraorbital foramen

maxilla

maxillary flange

mesorostral groove

mesorostral groove

alveoli

alveoli

mandibular symphysis

mental foramina

A

B

C

D

E

F

Fig. 2. The rostrum (A–D) and mandible (E, F) of the porpoise Phocoeni-dae gen. et sp. indet., NMV-5, early Pliocene of Teshio, Hokkaido, Japan; in dorsal (A, F), lateral (B, E), ventral (C), and anterior (D) views.

Table 1. Measurements (in mm) of the vertebrae of the porpoise NMV-5. Abbreviations: e, estimated transverse measurements (half measure-ment multiplied by 2); +, measured element is incomplete to some extent; CL, length of centrum; CH, height of anterior articular surface of centrum; CW, width of anterior articular surface of centrum; GH, greatest height of vertebra; GW, greatest width of vertebra; CL/CH, length of centrum/height of anterior articular surface of centrum; X, XX, XXX, precise position of vertebrae within the vertebral column unknown.

CL CH CW GH GB CL/CHAtlas 22.6 36.0+ 75.0e 40.0+ 101.0+ ?Axis 16.7 27.8 61.0 38.6+ 64.2+ 0.603rd cervical 4.8 25.9 30.4 31.6+ 37.0+ 0.194th cervical 4.5 26.6 29.9 37.0+ 34.4+ 0.175th cervical 4.5 26.7 28.6 37.6 35.2 0.176th cervical 5.8 26.2 30.0 46.7 41.0 0.227th cervical 6.6 26.8 31.4 43.2+ 55.4+ 0.251st thoracic 11.3 26.0 27.8 41.2+ 69.3 0.433rd thoracic 17.0 24.1 30.2 48.7+ 68.8e 0.715th thoracic 19.8 24.7 26.0 75.8+ 68.0 0.80Thoracic X 32.7 27.8 29.2 112.0 88.9 1.18Thoracic XX 22.3+ 26.5 29.9 48.4+ 105.2e ?Thoracic XXX 33.9 28.9 29.2 118.0 139.8e 1.17Last thoracic-1 35.4 28.8 30.5 ? 158.0 1.23Last thoracic 37.2 31.8 37.5 129.0 137.6+ 1.171st lumbar 37.6 32.2 38.4 70.4+ 159.2e 1.172nd lumbar 36.4 29.7 34.6 98.5 122.1+ 1.233rd lumbar 36.1 31.4 35.9 129.9 163.0 1.15

MURAKAMI ET AL.—PLIOCENE PORPOISE FROM JAPAN 101

Thoracic vertebrae.—Eight thoracic vertebrae are preserved, with the posterior five having relatively long centra (Fig. 4A; Table 1). In terms of their relative and absolute centrum lengths, these vertebrae are intermediate between those of Numataphocoena yamashitai and extant species. All of the

preserved thoracics have flattened anterior and posterior cen-trum faces, as well as well-developed metapophyses. Un-like in other phocoenids, except Phocoena sinus Norris and McFarland, 1958 and Phocoenoides dalli (True, 1885), the neural spines of the posterior thoracics are tall, slender and

Table 2. Vertebral traits analysed in this study. Abbreviations: CL, length of centrum; CH, height of anterior articular surface of centrum; [ ], character number used in previous studies.

Character Source

1 Cervical vertebrae unfused (0); only atlas and axis fused (1); C1–C3 or C1–C4 fused (2); C1–C6 or C1–C7 fused (3) Murakami et al. 2012b [220]

2 Number of thoracic vertebrae 9-11 (0); 12–14 (1); ≥ 15 (2) Murakami et al. 2012b [222]3 Number of lumbar vertebrae 7 (0); 9–13 (1); 14–19 (2); 24–27 (3) Murakami et al. 2012b [227]4 Number of caudal vertebrae 21–26 (0); 27–33 (1); 41–49 (2) Murakami et al. 2012b [228]5 Lumbar count > thoracic count absent (0); present (1) Buchholtz and Schur 2004

6 Length of cervicals (C1–C7) as percent of height of vertebral body plus neural canal of atlas long, >150% (0); short, <150% (1) Murakami et al. 2012b [221]

7 Ratio of CL/CH in thoracic vertebrae > 1.20 in more than one vertebra (0); > 0.95 in several vertebrae (1); <0.75 in all vertebrae (2) Buchholtz and Schur 2004 [12]

8 Ratio of CL/CH in lumbar vertebrae> 1.20 in more than one vertebra (0); > 0.95 in more than one vertebra (1); < 0.95 in all vertebrae (2); < 0.75 in all vertebrae (3)

Buchholtz and Schur 2004 [12]

9 Length of tail stock CL of torso (lumbar + caudal vertebrae anterior to tail stock)

> CL of tail stock (0); secondary rise in tail stock CL (1) Buchholtz and Schur 2004 [6]

10 All thoracics and lumbars amphicelous absent (0);present (1) Buchholtz and Schur 200411 Bulbous or triangular transverse process of lumbars present (0); absent (1) Murakami et al. 2012b [225]

12 Height of neural spines in posterior thoracics and anterior lumbars (greatest height of vertebrae/CH) <4.0 (0); between 4.0 and 5.0 (1); >5.0 (2)

13 Orientations of neural spines in posterior thoracic and lumbar vertebrae

strongly posteriorly inclined (0); posteriorly inclined or vertically standing (1); several neural spines inclined anteriorly = syncliny (2)

Buchholtz and Schur 2004 [5]

14 Regional anterior inclination of neural arches absent (0); present (1) Buchholtz and Schur 2004 [1]

15 Metapophyses torso metapophyses uniformly present (0); regional absence of torso metapophyses (1) Buchholtz and Schur 2004 [8]

16 Regionally elevated metapophyses absent (0); present (1) Buchholtz and Schur 2004 [1]

neonatalline

GLG 1

1 mm

1 mm

GLG 2

GLG 3

GLG 4

enamel

pulp cavity

prenataldentine

A B C D

Fig. 3. Isolated teeth of the porpoise Phocoenidae gen. et sp. indet., NMV-5, early Pliocene of Teshio, Hokkaido, Ja-pan; in buccal view (A, B); longitudinal cross section of B (C); cross section from C stained with Mayer’s haematox-ylin (D). GLG, growth layer group.

102 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 60 (1), 2015

strongly recurved anteriorly (Fig. 4A). The neural spines of Neophocaena phocaenoides Cuvier, 1829, are also strongly recurved anteriorly, but differ from those of NMV-5 in being distinctly shorter dorsoventrally, and longer anteroposterior-ly. The neural spines of at least two of the thoracic vertebrae exhibit exostosis, with their distal tips being moderately ex-panded anteroposteriorly, and slightly swollen laterally.Lumbar vertebrae.—Three lumbar vertebrae, likely repre-senting L1– L3 are preserved, and, except for the absence of an articular surface for the rib on their transverse processes, resemble the posterior thoracics in their general morphology.

The centra of the lumbar vertebrae are distinctly elongated, both in relative (as compared to rostral width) and absolute terms. In dorsal view, the anterior and posterior edges of the transverse process of the first lumbar vertebra and an isolated posterior transverse process are parallel, whereas the transverse process of the second lumbar vertebra slightly widens anteroposteriorly (Fig. 4B). In this, NMV-5 resem-bles Salumiphocaena stocktoni, Piscolithax longirostris and extant species, and differs from Numataphocoena yamashi-tai, in which the transverse processes are distinctly widened distally. The neural spines on the first and third lumbars show a remarkable degree of exostosis, making their distal tips

10 cm

cervical vertebrae

thoracic vertebrae

lumbar vertebrae

cervical vertebrae

transverse process

fossae for dorsal longitiudinal ligament

transverse process

pathologic neural spine

pathologic neural spine

neural arch

neural arch

neural canal

metapophysis

metapophysis

centrum completely fused epiphysis

centrum completely fused epiphysis

thoracic vertebrae

lumbar vertebrae

neural spine

neural spine

A

B

C D

E

transverse process

F

G

Fig. 4. Vertebrae (A–E) and ribs (F, G) of the porpoise Phocoenidae gen. et sp. indet., NMV-5, early Pliocene of Teshio, Hokkaido, Japan. Cervical (1–7), thoracic (1, 3, 5, 7, X, XX, XXX, last-1, last), and lumbar vertebrae (1–3) in lateral (A) and dorsal (B) views; atlas (C), axis (D), first lumbar (E), left rib fragment (F), and anterior to central right ribs (G) in anterior view.

MURAKAMI ET AL.—PLIOCENE PORPOISE FROM JAPAN 103

Fig. 5. The phylogeny and vertebral morphology of Phocoenidae. The phylogenetic analysis is based on the data matrix of Murakami et al. (2012b), ex-cluding character 220, 221, 222, 224, and 227. Quotations added to taxa which are paraphyly or polyphyly in the present cladistic analysis.

Strict consensus tree of 121most parsimonious trees found by tree-bisection-reconnection

For each parsimonious treeTree length: 1676Consistensy Index: 0.246Retention Index: 0.629Rescaled Consistency Index: 0.155

Delphinoidea

Delphinida

Odontoceti

2

5

4

3

3

3

2

1

1

6

4

3

2

2

2

2

29

5

2

2

2

36

11

16

3

3

11

11

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

11

11

7

2

2

3

11

1

1

11

11

1

1

1

1 1

1

stem Cetacea

"Xenorophiidae"

AgorophiidaePatriocetidaeWaipatiidaeProsqalodontidaeSqualodontidaeSqualodelphidae

Platanistidae

Eurhinodelphinidae

Physeteroidea

Ziphiidae

Iniidae

"Pontoporiidae"

Lipotoidea

"Kentriodontidae"

Albireonidae

Odobenocetopsidae"Monodontidae"

Phocoenidae

Delphinidae

Georgiacetus vogtlensisZygorhiza kochiiArchaeodelphis patriusXenorophus sloaniiAgorophius pygmaeusPatriocetus kazakhstanicusWaipatia maerewhenuaProsqualodon davidisSqualodon calvertensisNotocetus vanbenedeniPlatanista gangeticaZarhachis flagellatorPomatodelphis inaequalis

Squaloziphius emlongiXiphiacetus bossi

Kogia brevicepsOrycterocetus crocodilinusPhyseter catodonBerardius bairdiiTasmacetus shepherdiZiphius cavirostrisMesoplodon ginkgodens

Lipotes vexilliferParapontoporia sternbergiBrachydelphis mazeasiPliopontos littoralis

Inia geoffrensisPontoporia blainvillei

Hadrodelphis calvertenseKentriodon pernixAtocetus iquensisAlbireo whistleri

Denebola brachycephalaOdobenocetops peruvianus

Delphinapterus leucasMonodon monocerosPterophocaena nishinoiMiophocaena nishinoi

Haborophocoena toyoshimai"Haborophocoena" minutusSeptemtriocetus bosselaersi"Piscolithax" boreiosAustralithax intermediaLomacetus ginsburgiSalumiphocaena stocktoni"Piscolithax" tedfordiPiscolithax longirostrisNeophocaena phocaenoides"Phocoena" sinus"Phocoena" spinipinnis"Phocoena" dioptricaPhocoena phocoenaPhocoenoides dalliCephalorhynchus hectoriOrcaella brevirostris

Orcinus orcaHemisyntrachelus cortesiiPseudorca crassidensEodelphinus kabatensis

Feresa attenuataGlobicephala macrorhynchusGrampus griseusPeponocephala electraTursiops truncatusSteno bredanensisSousa chinensisSotalia fluviatilisLagenodelphis hoseiLissodelphis borealisLeucopleurus acutusDelphinus delphisStenella attenuata

Archaeophocaena teshioensis

104 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 60 (1), 2015

appear globular in lateral and dorsal view (Fig. 4E). On the third lumbar, the area affected by exostosis measures 48 mm anteroposteriorly, and 24 mm laterally. The presence of ex-ostosis indicates that this individual suffered from serious disease or injury at some point during its life.Rib.—At least eight ribs are preserved, including five from the anterior or central portion of the right ribcage (Fig. 4F, G).

Results and discussionAffinity of the specimen.—The spatulate teeth of NMV-5 are indicative of Phocoenidae, and resemble those of extant taxa, as well as those of the extinct species Haborophocoena toyoshimai Ichishima and Kimura, 2005 and Numataphoc-oena yamashitai. Among these taxa, NMV-5 is similar to the relatively basal Haborophocoena spp. (Fig. 5; see also Murakami et al. 2012b) in having a narrow rostrum (the ros-trum of N. yamashitai is currently unknown). NMV-5 shares with N. yamashitai the presence of elongated post-cervical vertebrae, but differs from the latter in its detailed morpholo-gy (see below). Finally, NMV-5 is much smaller than H. toy-oshimai or N. yamashitai, but similar in size to, H. minutus

Ichishima and Kimura, 2009. However, comparisons with H. minutus are currently impossible owing to a lack of com-parable material, except for the base of the rostrum. Overall, NMV-5 thus likely represents a basal phocoenid of uncertain generic and specific affinity.

Age estimation.—As was reported for Phocoenoides dalli by Kasuya (1978), but in contrast to other delphinoids, the enamel dissolved imperfectly in the formic acid. The decalcified part of the enamel stained black with hematoxylin. In addition to the enamel, the prenatal dentine, and the neonatal line, the cross section of the tooth revealed four growth layer groups (Fig. 3C, D), with each of the latter being considerably thinner than the prenatal dentine and consisting of a thin, dark-stained layer and a thick, light grey one. The presence of four growth layer groups indicates that the animal died at four years of age.

Despite its relatively young age, we consider NMV-5 to be a fully mature individual, based on the complete ankylosis of the epiphyses of all of the preserved thoracics and lumbar vertebrae (e.g., Perrin 1975; Ichishima and Kimura 2000). In achieving maturity within less than four 4 years, NMV-5 clearly differs from extant phocoenids, which reach physical maturity considerably later. Thus, Phocoenoides dalli reach-es physical maturity at 7.16 years in males (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.7–8.6 years) and 7.24 years in females (95% CI = 6.3–8.1 years) (Ferrero and Walker 1999). In Phocoena phocoena, the youngest physically mature individuals ob-served so far were 6-year-old male and a 7-year-old female, with estimates of the age at which 50% of individuals are physically mature ranging from 8.4 years for males (95% CI = 7.4–9.9 years) to 8.1 years for females (95% CI = 7.3–9.2 years; Galatius and Kinze 2003). Finally, Neophocaena pho-caenoides attains physical maturity at 14–23 years (Yoshida et al. 1994). It is furthermore noteworthy that, even when the examined individuals were very old, not all of the vertebral epiphyses were completely fused to the vertebral centra in most of the specimens included in the above studies (Yoshida et al. 1994; Galatius and Kinze 2003).

The markedly early inset of sexual maturity in NMV-5 as compared to extant phocoenids might be the result of differ-ent growths rate during ontogenesis. Extant phocoenids are thought to have undergone paedomorphic evolution (Barnes 1985; Galatius and Kinze 2003; Ichishima and Kimura 2005; Galatius et al. 2011). Specifically, the presence of a relatively short and wide rostrum, a rounded cranium, incompletely fused vertebral and flipper epiphyses, and small body size have been interpreted as evidence for progenesis (Barnes 1985; Galatius and Kinze 2003; Galatius 2005; Ichishima and Kimura 2005; Galatius et al. 2006), i.e., the onset of sexual maturity at an

Table 3. Character–taxon matrix for the vertebral traits analysed in this study.

Taxon 10 16Delphinapterus leucas 0000000000 000000Cephalorhynchus hectori 21[12]0110211 112101Orcinus orca 3[01]10011100 101101Pseudorca crassidens 3010010000 100101Steno bredanensis 1121111211 112101Leucopleurus acutus 1121111211 112111Stenella attenuata 2[12][23][12]111211 112111Numataphocoena yamashitai † 0000??00?1 0?????NMV-5 † 0?????00?1 110???Piscolithax aenigmaticus † 023??????? 1?10??Pterophocaena nishinoi † 0????1???? ??????Archaeophocaena teshioensis † ?????????? ??????Miophocaena nishinoi † ?????????? ??????Haborophocoena toyoshimai † ?????????? ??????Haborophocoena minutus † ?????????? ??????Septemtriocetus bosselaersi † ?????????? ??????Piscolithax boreios † 0????????? ??????Australithax intermedia † ?????????? ??????Lomacetus ginsburgi † ?????????? ??????Salumiphocaena stocktoni † 0?2??????? 10????Piscolithax tedfordi † 0?0??????1 ??????Piscolithax longirostris † 0?0??123?1 10????Neophocaena phocaenoides 211[01]011101 100000Phocoena sinus 21[12]11111?1 111011Phocoena spinipinnis 2111111101 100010Phocoena dioptrica 3121111101 001000Phocoena phocoena 3121111101 102100Phocoenoides dalli 3232112311 122110

Fig. 6. Comparisons of the vertebral column of living and extinct pho-coenids in lateral view. A. Pterophocaena nishinoi Murakami, Shimada, Hikida, and Hirano, 2012a, late Miocene of Hokkaido, Japan, NMV-7. B. Numataphocoena yamashitai Ichishima and Kimura, 2000, early Plio-cene of Hokkaido, Japan, NFL 7. C. Piscolithax aenigmaticus Pilleri and Siber, 1989, late Miocene of Aguada de Lomas of Peru, SMNK-PAL 6660. D. Piscolithax longirostris Muizon, 1983, late Miocene of Sud-Sacaco, →

MURAKAMI ET AL.—PLIOCENE PORPOISE FROM JAPAN 105

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

cervical (7) thoracic (?)

thoracic (11) lumbar (7)

thoracic (15)

lumbar (15)

cervical (7)

cervical (7)

thoracic (?) lumbar (?)

cervical (7) thoracic (13) lumbar (12)

cervical (7) thoracic (13) lumbar (14)

cervical (7) thoracic (13) lumbar (15)

cervical (7) thoracic (13) lumbar (15)

cervical thoracic (13) lumbar (14)

cervical (7) thoracic (16) lumbar (25) caudal (44)

caudal (34)

caudal (31)

caudal (27+)

caudal (16+)

caudal (21+)

caudal (31)

Peru, MNHN SAS 934. E. Neophocaena phocaenoides Cuvier, 1829, Holocene of Japan?, NMNS M 24659. F. Phocoena sinus Norris and McFarland, 1958, Holocene of Baja California, Mexico, LACM 28259. G. Phocoena spinipinnis Burmeister, 1865, Holocene of Peru, USNM 550782. H. Phocoena dioptrica Lahille, 1912, Holocene of Tierra del Fuego, Argentina, LACM 86042. I. Phocoena phocoena Linnaeus, 1758, Holocene of Hokkaido, Japan, NMNS M 27393. J. Phocoenoides dalli True, 1885, Holocene of Iwate, Japan, NMNS M 21382. Not to scale.

106 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 60 (1), 2015

early ontogenetic stage, resulting in a relatively small adult retaining juvenile morphological features (McNamara 1986). Like the progenetic extant phocoenids, NMV-5 became sexu-ally mature at an early age and retained a small body size even as an adult. However, NMV-5 seems to have been subject to considerably faster growth rates possibly pointing to accel-eration (a type of peramorphosis), which is characterized by elevated growth rates during ontogeny leading to an adult form that is no larger, and indeed often smaller, than its ancestor (McNamara 1986). Acceleration may also explain the pres-ence of a relatively long and narrow rostrum (as inferred from the long and narrow rostra of the relatively basal phocoenids Lomacetus ginsburgi Muizon, 1986 and Australithax interme-dia Muizon, 1988), although the latter might also have been the result of feeding adaptations (Werth 2006).

Vertebral counts and dimensions.—All extinct phocoenids, including NMV-5 and Numataphocoena yamashitai, have seven unfused cervical vertebrae, as in the outgroup Delphi-napterus leucas ([character 1-0], hereafter the character num-ber and its state according to the present analysis are given in square brackets; see Tables 2, 3). By contrast, the first three or four cervical vertebrae are fused [1-2] in Neophocaena phocaenoides (Fig. 6E), Phocoena sinus (Fig. 6F), and P. spinipinnis (Burmeister, 1865) (Fig. 6G), and all, or almost all (C1 –C6), of the cervicals are fused in in P. phocoena, P. dioptrica Lahille, 1912 and Phocoenoides dalli [1-3] (Fig. 6I, H, J). Both N. yamashitai (Fig. 6B) and D. leucas have 11 thoracic vertebrae [2-0]. By contrast, Phocoenoides dalli and the extinct Piscolithax aenigmaticus have 15–18 and 15 tho-racic vertebrae, respectively [2-2] (Figs. 6C, J, 7A), whereas all other phocoenids have 12–14 thoracic vertebrae [2-1]. Both N. yamashitai (Fig. 6B) and D. leucas have only seven lumbar vertebrae [3-0]. This number increases to 9– 13 and 13, respectively, in Neophocaena phocaenoides and P. spinip-innis [3-1] (Fig. 6E, G), and to 13–17 in P. sinus, P. dioptrica, and P. phocoena [3-1 or 3-2] (Fig. 6F, H, I). Phocoenoides dalli has considerably more lumbar vertebrae (17–24) than other species [3-3] (Figs. 6J, 8). Finally, N. yamashitai and D. leucas have less than 26 caudal vertebrae [4-0]. This contrasts with 26 –33 in Neophocaena phocaenoides [4-0 or 1] (Fig. 6E), 27–33 in almost all other extant phocoenids [4-1] (Fig. 6F–I), and 44 –49 in Phocoenoides dalli [4-2] (Figs. 6J, 8).

The cervical vertebrae of even the most basal phocoe-nids, such as Pterophocaena nishinoi Murakami, Shimada, Hikida, and Hirano, 2012a (Fig. 6A) and NMV-5 (Figs. 4, 8), are considerably shorter anteroposteriorly than those of monodontids or kentriodontids. Thus, the sum of all cervical vertebral lengths as a percentage of the height of the atlas (vertebral body plus the neural canal) is less than 150% in phocoenids [6-1], but greater than 150% in Delphinapterus leucas [6-0]. In NMV-5, Numataphocoena yamashitai (Figs. 6B, 8A), and D. leucas, the ratio of the anteroposterior length of the centrum (CL) to the dorsoventral height of the anterior articular surface of the centrum (CH) is greater than 1.20 in more than one thoracic vertebra [7-0]. In Neophocaena pho-

caenoides, Phocoena sinus, P. spinipinnis, and P. phocoena, the same ratio equals 0.95 in several vertebrae [7-1] (Figs. 6E–H, 8B), whereas it is less than 0.75 in Phocoenoides dalli and Piscolithax longirostris [7-2] (Figs. 6I, J, 8A, B).

The CL/CH ratio is greater 1.20 in more than one lumbar vertebra [8-0] in NMV-5, Numataphocoena yamashitai (Figs. 6B, 8A), and Delphinapterus leucas, and greater than 0.95 in more than one lumbar vertebra in Neophocaena phocaenoi-des, Phocoena sinus, and P. spinipinnis [8-1] (Fig. 6E–H). By contrast, this ratio is less than 0.95 for all lumbar verte-brae in P. phocoena [8-2] (Fig. 6H), and less than 0.75 for all lumbar vertebrae in Phocoenoides dalli and Piscolithax longirostris [8-3] (Figs. 6D, J, 7B, 8A, B). Numataphocoena yamashitai (Fig. 6B) and D. leucas have fewer lumbar ver-tebrae than thoracic vertebrae [5-0]. By contrast, the number of lumbar vertebrae exceeds the number of thoracic vertebrae in extant phocoenids [5-1] (Fig. 6F–J), except Neophocaena phocaenoides (Fig. 6E). In Neophocaena phocaenoides (Fig. 6E), P. spinipinnis (Fig. 6G), P. phocoena (Fig. 6I), and D. leucas, the CL of the vertebrae forming the torso (lumbar + caudal vertebrae anterior to the tail stock; Buchholtz and Schur 2004) is greater than the CL of the vertebrae forming the tail stock [9-0]. Only Phocoenoides (Fig. 6J) displays a secondary increase in the CL of the tail stock vertebrae [9-1].

The vertebral counts in each region of the vertebral column of Numataphocoena yamashitai are nearly identical to those of the outgroup taxon Delphinapterus leucas. By contrast, other phocoenids, as exemplified in particular by Phocoenoi-des dalli (Fig. 6J), are characterised by increased numbers of thoracic, lumbar, and caudal vertebrae, implying that changes in vertebral counts across different regions of the vertebral column may be correlated. In these animals, the posterior thoracic and anterior caudal vertebrae resemble the lumbars in terms of the height and inclination of their neural processes (“lumbarisation” sensu Buchholtz et al. 2005). Taken togeth-er, the increased vertebral counts and lumbarisation result in an expanded mid-body region, thus providing the greater rigidity to the column and skeletal support for epaxial and hypaxial muscles responsible for generating the propulsive force (Buchholtz et al. 2005). Increased vertebral counts also correlate negatively with the relative lengths of the centra, with most phocoenids having considerably shorter vertebrae than monodontids. The absolute displacement of the posterior face of a vertebra from the axis of the vertebra anterior to it decreases with decreasing centrum length, thus resulting in a more rigid vertebral column allowing high-speed swimming (Buchholtz 2001; Buchholtz and Schur 2004).Within Phoco-enidae, the relative length of the centra seems to be shortest in Phocoenoides dalli, Piscolithax longirostris and possibly Pterophocaena nishinoi, followed by most of the extant spe-cies, NMV-5, and Numataphocoena yamashitai (Fig. 8).

Centrum faces.—The thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Delphinapterus leucas and Numataphocoena yamashitai have irregular faces, ranging from amphicoelous to slightly procoelous or opisthocoelous [10-0]. By contrast, all other

MURAKAMI ET AL.—PLIOCENE PORPOISE FROM JAPAN 107

Delphinapterus leucas

Cephalorhynchus hectori

Pterophocaena nishinoi†Miophocaena nishinoi†

Archaeophocaena teshioensis†Haborophocoena toyoshimai†"Haborophocoena" minutus†Septemtriocetus bosselaersi†

"Piscolithax" boreios†Australithax intermedia†Lomacetus ginsburgi†

Salumiphocaena stocktoni†"Piscolithax" tedfordi†

Piscolithax longirostris†Neophocaena phocaenoides

"Phocoena" sinus"Phocoena" spinipinnis"Phocoena" dioptricaPhocoena phocoenaPhocoenoides dalli

Numataphocoena yamashitaiNMV-5

Orcinus orcaPseudorca crassidens

Steno bredanensisLeucopleurus actusStenella attenuata

Piscolithax aenigmaticus

Delphinapterus leucas

Cephalorhynchus hectori

Pterophocaena nishinoi†Miophocaena nishinoi†

Archaeophocaena teshioensis†Haborophocoena toyoshimai†"Haborophocoena" minutus†Septemtriocetus bosselaersi†

"Piscolithax" boreios†Australithax intermedia†Lomacetus ginsburgi†

Salumiphocaena stocktoni†"Piscolithax" tedfordi†

Piscolithax longirostris†Neophocaena phocaenoides

"Phocoena" sinus"Phocoena" spinipinnis"Phocoena" dioptricaPhocoena phocoenaPhocoenoides dalli

Numataphocoena yamashitaiNMV-5

Orcinus orcaPseudorca crassidens

Steno bredanensisLeucopleurus actusStenella attenuata

Piscolithax aenigmaticus

Monodontidae Monodontidae

Delphinidae Delphinidae

Phocoenidae Phocoenidae

Character 12Character 14

(0)

(1) (2) (0) (1)

height of neural spine regional neural arch anterior inclination

C D

Monodontidae Monodontidae

Delphinidae Delphinidae

Phocoenidae Phocoenidae

Character 8

Character 2

(0) 9-11

(1) 12-14

(2) >15

(0)

(1)

(2)

(3)

thoracic vertebral counts

ratio of CL/CH in lumbar vertebrae

A B

Fig. 7. Vertebral character trait evolution across phocoenids and related delphinoids. A. Character 2, thoracic vertebral counts. B. Character 8, ratio of centrum length/centrum height of lumbar vertebrae. C. Character 12, height of neural spine. D. Character 14, regional anterior inclination of neural arches. See Table 2 for detailed character descriptions.

108 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 60 (1), 2015

extinct and extant phocoenids have amphicoelous thoracic and lumbar vertebrae [10-1]. Since flattened or amphicoelus centra increase the rigidity of the vertebral column at the expense of manoeuvrability (Buchholtz and Schur 2004), all phocoenids except N. yamashitai can be inferred to have a more rigid vertebral column than monodontids.

Transverse processes of the lumbar vertebrae.—The mor-phology of the transverse processes may affect the lateral movement of the vertebral column as it determines the an-teroposterior length of the intertransverse ligaments adjacent to the vertebrae. The narrow transverse processes likely de-crease the length of the ligaments, thus making the column more rigid. Delphinapterus leucas, Numataphocoena ya-mashitai, and Phocoena dioptrica retain bulbous transverse processes of the lumbar vertebrae, previously shown to be a synapomorphy of Delphinida (Muizon 1984) [11-0]. By con-trast, the transverse processes of other phocoenids, including NMV-5, are anteroposteriorly narrow and have nearly paral-lel anterior and posterior edges [11-1] (Fig. 4).

Orientations and lengths of the neural spines and arches.—The orientation and length of the neural arches and spines correlate with the forces of the longissimus and multifidus muscles (Slijper 1936, 1961; Buchholtz 2001; Buchholtz and Schur 2004), with long neural spines providing larger attach-ment areas for the locomotor muscles (Buchholtz et al. 2004) and increasing the overall second moment of the cross-sec-

tional area of the intervertebral ligaments (Long et al. 1997). The neural spines of the posterior thoracic and anterior lum-bar vertebrae are low in Piscolithax longirostris, Phocoena spinipinnis, P. dioptrica, P. phocoena, and especially Neo-phocaena phocaenoides (greatest height of vertebra/centrum height <4.0; Fig. 6D, E, G–I) [12-0]. By contrast, those of NMV-5 and of several vertebrae of P. sinus are relatively high (vertebra/centrum height = 4.0–5.0; Figs. 4, 6F, 7C) [12-1], with those of Phocoenoides dalli being yet higher (vertebra/centrum height > 5.0; Fig. 6J) [12-2].

The neural spines of the posterior thoracic and anterior lumbar vertebrae are strongly inclined posteriorly in Delph-inapterus leucas, NMV-5, Neophocaena phocaenoides, and Phocoena spinipinnis [13-0], and somewhat less so in Pisco-lithax aenigmaticus, Phocoena sinus, and P. dioptrica [13-1] (Fig. 6D, F, H). By contrast, the neural spines in this region point anteriorly in P. phocoena and Phocoenoides dalli [13-2] (Fig. 6I, J). In D. leucas and most phocoenids, the neural arches of the posterior thoracic and anterior lumbar vertebrae are vertical or oriented posteriorly [14-0], whereas they are oriented anteriorly in P. phocoena and Phocoenoides dalli [14-1] (Figs. 6I, J, 7D). In the latter taxa, the anterior incli-nation of the neural spines likely enhances the flexion of the fluke during locomotion, as indicated by Slijper (1961).

Metapophyses.—As in Delphinapterus leucas, the thoracic and torso vertebrae of most phocoenids bear well-developed

1.75

△△

△△

△△

△△

△△

1 10

5

15 20 25 30 35 40 45

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

NMV-5†

Numataphocoena yamashitai †

Piscolithax longirostris†

A

Leng

th o

f cen

trum

/ he

ight

of c

entru

m

Pterophocaena nishinoi†

first lumbar vertebra

first thoracic vertebra

first caudal vertebra

incomplete or missingvertebra last preserved vertebra

105 15 20 25 30 35 40 50 60 70 908045 55 65 75 85

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

Neophocaena phocaenoides

Phocoenoides dalli

Phocoena phocoenaP. dioptorica

P. spinipinnisP. sinus

1

Vertebra number

Leng

th o

f cen

trum

/ he

ight

of c

entru

m

B

0.20

first thoracic vertebra

Vertebra number

1.40

1.60

Fig. 8. Comparison of centrum length/centrum height across Phocoenidae. A. Extinct species: Numataphocoena yamashitai, NFL 7, NMV-5; Pteropho-caena nishinoi, NMV-7; Piscolithax longirostris, MNHN SAS 940. B. Extant species: Neophocaena phocaenoides, NMNS M 21382; Phocoenoides dalli, NMNS M 21382; Phocoena phocoena, NMNS M 27393; Phocoena dioptrica, USNM 571486; Phocoena spinipinnis, USNM 550782; Phocoena sinus, NHMUK 69678 (from Noble and Fraser 1971).

MURAKAMI ET AL.—PLIOCENE PORPOISE FROM JAPAN 109

[15-0], low metapophyses [16-0]. By contrast, metapophyses are reduced or absent in the vertebrae forming the torso of P. sinus (in which they are also elevated [16-1]), P. spinipin-nis, and Phocoenoides dalli [15-1] (Fig. 6F, G, J). Elevated metapophyses increase the distance between the force appli-cation and the axis of rotation, thus enhancing mechanical advantage, but limiting angular rotation (Buchholtz and Schur 2004). Metapophyses also provide insertion sites for the main effectors of column extension (the multifidus and longissi-mus muscle systems); thus, their absence or reduction in P. sinus, P. spinipinnis, and Phocoenoides dalli likely reflects an increase in columnar rigidity (Buchholtz and Schur 2004).

Character evolution.—The evolution of vertebral traits re-lated to swimming ability in Phocoenidae is not a simple, stepwise process (Fig. 7B, C), with several characters (3, 7, 8, 12, and 16) apparently having emerged convergently in several extant and extinct lineages (Table 3). This pattern would likely turn out to be even more complex if it were pos-sible to determine the phylogenetic relationships of NMV-5, Numataphocoena yamashitai, and Piscolithax aenigmaticus. Phocoenoides dalli stands out for having evolved a suite of highly derived characters (Fig. 7, Table 3) nearly identical to that of Leucopleurus acutus (Fig. 7, Table 3; Buchholtz and Schur 2004; Buchholtz et al. 2005), allowing it to swim at a maximum speed of 55 km/h (Leatherwood and Reeves 1986). Among phocoenids, only Phocoenoides dalli and Phocoena phocoena show neural spine syncliny (reversed spine orientation), which was emphasised by Buchholtz and Schur (2004) as an early and critical step in the evolution of the delphinid column. Apart from Phocoenoides dalli, the vertebral columns of P. phocoena, P. sinus, and Piscolithax longirostris are also highly derived, despite these species belonging to different lineages.

Neophocaena phocaenoides has the most archaic column among extant phocoenids, with several features enhancing columnar flexibility rather than the rigidity needed for high-speed swimming. This morphology of this species may be related to its shallow coastal water or riverine habitats, where the submarine topography is undulating. The vertebral traits of Numataphocoena yamashitai are nearly identical to those of the monodontid Delphinapterus leucas, and thus likely the ancestral morphology of phocoenids as a whole. Although the swimming ability and manoeuvrability of N. yamashitai may have been similar to that of Delphinapterus, the ecology of these two species is likely not comparable owing to differ-ences in body size, latitudinal distribution, and the morphol-ogy of the feeding apparatus. The vertebral morphology of NMV-5 is intermediate between that of D. leucas and N. ya-mashitai on the one hand Neophocaena phocaenoides on the other, although it is more similar to the former. However, the height of the neural spines of NMV-5 exceeds that of all three of these three species, as well as that of most of its extant relatives. This observation suggests that NMV-5 may have been capable of faster swimming speeds than Neophocaena phocaenoides, thus exemplifying the complex evolutionary

history of the vertebral column in phocoenids. In addition, the different vertebral morphologies of the contemporaneous taxa Numataphocoena yamashitai, Piscolithax longirostris, and NMV-5 (early Pliocene) may indicate their adaptation to different environments.

ConclusionsNMV-5, a new, small fossil phocoenid from the lower Plio-cene Koetoi Formation, Hokkaido, northern Japan, is char-acterised by a unique combination of characters, including a small and narrow rostrum, long centra of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, and high neural spines. Dental growth lay-er groups indicate that NMV-5 attained physical maturity at a considerably younger age than extant phocoenids, as evi-denced by ankylosis of the vertebral epiphyses. This might have resulted from a developmental pattern different from the progenesis observed in extant phocoenids, although more information is required to confirm this.

Numataphocoena yamashitai and Phocoenoides dalli represent the ends of an anatomical continuum in terms of phocoenid vertebral morphology, with the vertebral column of the former being the most archaic and nearly identical to that of the monodontid Delphinapterus leucas. Phoco-enid vertebral evolution has been complex and frequently convergent, as opposed to stepwise and unidirectional (fast swimmer vs. maneuverable swimmer), as clearly demon-strated by the combination of primitive and highly derived vertebral characters in NMV-5. Its high neural spines suggest that NMV-5 had a relatively strong propulsive ability. At the same time, different vertebral morphologies observed in oth-er, contemporaneous living and fossil taxa suggest that they were adapted to different environments.

AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Christine Argot and Christian De Muizon (both MNHN), Lawrence Barnes, James Dine, David Janiger, Samuel Ma-cLeod (all LACM), Giovanni Bianucci and Chiara Sorbini (both Uni-versità di Pisa, Pisa, Italy), David Bohaska, James Mead, Charles Potter, John Ososky, Nicholas Pyenson (all USNM), Elisabetta Cioppi (Museo di Geologia e Paleontologia dell’Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy), Thomas Deméré and Kesler Randall (both San Diego Natural History Museum, San Diego, USA), Ewan Fordyce (Otago University, New Zealand), Hitoshi Furusawa (Sapporo Museum Activity Center, Sappo-ro, Japan), Judith Galkin and Eileen Westwig (both American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA), Stephen Godfrey (Calvert Marine Museum, Solomons, USA), Patricia Holroyd (University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkley, USA), Hiroto Ichishima (Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum, Katsuyama, Japan), Toshiyuki Kimura (Gunma Museum of Natural History, Tomioka, Japan), Yoshiki Koda (Ibaraki Nature Museum, Bando, Japan), Naoki Kohno, Nozomi Kuri-hara, Manami Makara, Yuko Tajima, Tadasu Yamada, Akiko Yatabe (all NMNS), Olivier Lambert (Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Brussels, Belgium), Miki Mizushima and Yuhji Soeda (both Historical Museum of Hokkaido, Sapporo, Japan), Daniele Ormezza-

110 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 60 (1), 2015

no (Museo Geopalaeontologico, Università di Torino, Torino, Italy), Gianluca Raineri (Museo Palaeontologico di Salsomaggiore Terme, Salsomaggiore Terme, Italy), Carlo Sarti and Gian Vai (both Museo Geopaleontologico G. Capellini, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Ita-ly), Satoshi Shinohara (Numata Fossil Museum, Numata, Japan), Gary Takeuchi (George C. Page Museum, Los Angeles, USA), Yasemin Tulu (Holland Museum, Holland, USA), and Roberto Zorzin (Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, Verona, Italy) for access to the specimens under their care and valuable suggestions. The authors are grateful to Ichiro Iwasaki (Saitama, Japan) for helping to prepare the thin section and Shinya Miyata and Kazuma Seike (both Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan) for counting growth layers of a tooth. The authors are thankful to Donald Hurlbert, Barbara Watanabe (both USNM), the Calvert Marine Museum, and the Clarissa and Lincoln Dryden Endowment for Paleon-tology at the Calvert Marine Museum for their financial support. The authors acknowledge Anders Galatius (Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark), an anonymous reviewer and editors Felix G. Marx (NMNS) and Mark D. Uhen (George Mason University, Virginia, USA) for re-views that greatly enhanced the manuscript.

ReferencesBarnes, L.G. 1985. Evolution, taxonomy and antitropical distributions of

the porpoises (Phocoenidae, Mammalia). Marine Mammal Science 1: 149–165.

Brisson, M.J. 1762. Le regnum animale in classes IX distributum, sive synopsis methodica sistens generalem animalium distributionem in classes IX, & duarum primarum classium, quadrupedum scilicet & cetaceorum, particularem dibvisionem in ordines, sectiones, genera & species. 296 pp. T. Haak, Paris.

Brownell, R.L., Jr. 1975. Phocoena dioptrica. Mammalian Species 66: 1–3.Brownell, R.L., Jr. 1983. Phocoena sinus. Mammalian Species 193: 1–3.Brownell, R.L., Jr. and Praderi, R. 1984. Phocoena spinipinnis. Mammali-

an Species 227: 1–4.Buchholtz, E.A. 1998. Implications of vertebral morphology for locomotor

evolution in early Cetacea. In: J.G.M. Thewissen (ed.), The Emergence of Whales: Evolutionary Patterns in the Origin of Cetacea, 325–351. Plenum Press, New York.

Buchholtz, E.A. 2001. Vertebral osteology and swimming style in living and fossil whales (Order Cetacea). Journal of Zoology, London 253: 175–190.

Buchholtz, E.A. and Schur, S.A. 2004. Vertebral osteology in Delphinidae (Cetacea). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140: 383–401.

Buchholtz, E.A., Wolkovich, E.M., and Cleary, R.J. 2005. Vertebral oste-ology and complexity in Lagenorhynchus acutus (Delphinidae) with comparison to other delphinoid genera. Marine Mammal Science 21: 411–428.

Burmeister, H. 1865. Description of a new species of porpoise in the Mu-seum of Buenos Ayres. Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings of the Zoological Society of London 1865: 228–231.

Cuvier, G. 1829. Le règne animal distribué d’après son organsation, pour servir de base a l’histoire naturelle des animaux et d’introduction a l’anatomie comparée. 584 pp. Chez Déterville, Libraire, Paris.

Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125: 1–15.

Ferrero, R. and Walker, W. 1999. Age, growth, and reproductive patterns of Dall’s porpoise (Phocoenoides dalli) in the central North Pacific Ocean. Marine Mammal Science 15: 273–313.

Fish, F.E. and Hui, C.A. 1991. Dolphin swimming—a review. Mammal Reviews 21: 181–195.

Flower, W.H. 1867. Description of the skeleton of Inia geoffrensis and of the skull of Pontoporia blainvillei with remarks on the systematic po-sition of these animals in the order Cetacea. Transactions of the Zoo-logical Society of London 6: 87–116.

Fukusawa, H. 1985. Late Neogene formations in the Tempoku-Haboro region, Hokkaido, Japan—stratigraphic reinvestigation of the “Wak-kanai” and “Koetoi” Formations [in Japanese, with English abstract]. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan 91: 883–849.

Fukusawa, H., Hoyanagi, K., and Akiyama, M. 1992. Stratigraphic and pa-leoenvironmental study of the Neogene formations in northern Central Hokkaido, Japan [in Japanese, with English abstract]. Memoirs of the Geological Society of Japan 37: 1–10.

Galatius, A. 2005. Sexually dimorphic proportions of the Harbour Porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) skeleton. Journal of Anatomy 206: 141–154.

Galatius, A. and Kinze, C.C. 2003. Ankylosis patterns in the postcranial skel-eton and hyoid bones of the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the Baltic and North Sea. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81: 1851–1861.

Galatius, A., Andersen, M.-B.E.R., Haugan, B., Langhoff, H.E., and Jes-persen, Å. 2006. Timing of epiphyseal development in the flipper skel-eton of the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) as an indicator of paedomorphosis. Acta Zoologica 87: 77–82.

Galatius, A., Berta, A., Frandsen, M.S., and Goodall, R.N.P. 2011. Inter-specific variation of ontogeny and skull shape among porpoises (Phoc-oenidae). Journal of Morphology 272: 136–148.

Gaskin, D.E., Arnold, P.W., and Blair, P.W. 1974. Phocoena phocoena. Mammalian Species 42: 1–8.

Gray, J.E. 1821. On the natural arrangement of vertebrose animals. London Medical Repository 15: 296–310.

Gray, J.E. 1825. An outline of an attempt at the disposition of Mammalia into tribes and families, with a list of the genera apparently appertain-ing to each tribe. Philosophical Annals 26: 337–344.

Gurevich, V.S., Stewart, B.S., and Cornell, L.H. 1980. The use of tetracy-cline in age determination of common dolphins, Delphinus delphis. In: W.F. Perrin and A.C. Myrick Jr. (eds.), Age Determination of Toothed Whales and Sirenians. International Whaling Commission Special Is-sue 3: 165–169.

Heyning, J.E. and Dahlheim, M.E. 1988. Orcinus orca. Mammalian Spe-cies 304: 1–8.

Hoyanagi, K., Miyasaka, S., Watanabe, Y., Kimura, G., and Matsui, M. 1986. Depositions of turbidites in the Miocene collision zone, central Hokkaido [in Japanese, with English abstract]. The Association for the Geological Collaboration in Japan Monograph 31: 265–284.

Hulbert, R.C., Jr., Petkewich, R.M., Bishop, G.A., Bukry, D., and Aleshire, D.P. 1998. A new Middle Eocene protocetid whale (Mammalia: Ceta-cea: Archaeoceti) and associated biota from Georgia. Journal of Pale-ontology 72: 907–927.

Ichishima, H. and Kimura, M. 2000. A new fossil porpoise (Cetacea; Del-phinoidea; Phocoenidae) from the Early Pliocene Horokaoshirarika Formation, Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20: 561–576.

Ichishima, H. and Kimura, M. 2005. Haborophocoena toyoshimai, a new fossil porpoise (Cetacea; Phocoenidae) from Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25: 655–664.

Ichishima, H. and Kimura, M. 2009. A new species of Haborophocoena, an Early Pliocene phocoenid cetacean from Hokkaido, Japan. Marine Mammal Science 25: 855–874.

Ichishima, H., Sato, E., Sagayama, T., and Kimura, M. 2006. The oldest record of Eschrichtidae (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the Late Pliocene, Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Paleontology 80: 367–379.

International Whaling Commission 1969. Report of the meeting on age determination in whales. Reports of the International Whaling Com-mission 19: 131–137.

Jefferson, T.A. 1988. Phocoenoides dalli. Mammalian Species 319: 1–7.Jefferson, T.A. and Hung, S. K. 2004. Neophocaena phocaenoides. Mam-

malian Species 746: 1–12.Kasuya, T. 1978. The life history of Dall’s porpoise with special reference

to the stock off the Pacific coast of Japan. Scientific Reports of the Whales Research Institute 30: 1–63.

Kasuya, T. 1983. Cetacean teeth and age determination (II) [in Japanese]. Science and Experiment 1983: 47–53.

Kohono, N., Hikida, Y., and Shimada, C. 2002. Morphology of the odo-

MURAKAMI ET AL.—PLIOCENE PORPOISE FROM JAPAN 111

benid pinniped (Mammalia: Carnivora) from the Upper Miocene Wakkanai Formation, Nakagawa Town, Hokkaido, Japan [in Japanese, with English abstract]. Bulletin of the Nakagawa Museum of Natural History 5: 23–36.

Lahille, F. 1912. Nota preliminar sobre una nueva especie de marsopa del Río de la Plata Phocoena dioptrica. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires 23: 269–278.

Lambert, O., Schlögl, J., and Kováč, M. 2008. Middle Miocene toothed whale with Platanista-like teeth from the Vienna Basin (Western Car-pathians, Slovakia). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 250: 157–166.

Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R.R. 1986. Porpoises and dolphins. In: D. Haley (ed.), Marine Mammals of the Eastern North Pacific and Arctic Waters, 110–131. Pacific Search Press, Seattle.

Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae secundum class-es, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, Editio decima, reformata. 824 pp. Salvius, Stockholm.

Long, J.H., Jr., Pabst, D.A., Shepherd, W.R., and McLellan, W.A. 1997. Locomotor design of dolphin vertebral columns: bending mechanics and morphology in Delphinus delphis. Journal of Experimental Biol-ogy 200: 65–81.

Maddison, W.P. and Maddison, D.R. 2010. Mesquite: a Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 2.73. Available at http://mesquite-project.org

McGowen, M.R., Spaulding, M., and Gatesy, J. 2009. Divergence date estimation and a comprehensive molecular tree of extant cetaceans. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53: 891–906.

McNamara, K.J. 1986. A guide to the nomenclature of heterochrony. Jour-nal of Paleontology 60: 4–13.

Mead, J.G. and Fordyce, R.E. 2009. The therian skull: a lexicon with em-phasis on the Odontocetes. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 627: 1–248.

Muizon, C. de 1983. Un nouveau Phocoenidae (Cetacea) du Pliocène in-férieur du Pérou. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, Série II 296: 1203–1206.

Muizon, C. de 1984. Les vertébrés fossiles de la Formation Pisco (Pérou). Deuxième partie: les odontocètes (Cetacea, Mammalia) du Pliocène inférieur de Sud Sacaco. Institut Français d’Études Andines Mémoire 50: 1–188.

Muizon, C. de 1986. Un nouveau Phocoenidae (Odontoceti, Mammalia) du Miocène supérieur de la Formation Pisco (Pérou). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, Série II 303: 1509–1512.

Muizon, C. de 1988. Les vertébrés fossiles de la Formation Pisco (Pérou). Troisième partie: les odontocètes (Cetacea, Mammalia) du Miocène. Institut Français D’Études Andines Mémoire 78: 1–244.

Murakami, M., Shimada, C., Hikida, Y., and Hirano, H. 2012a. A new basal porpoise, Pterophocaena nishinoi (Cetacea, Odontoceti, Delphi-noidea), from the upper Miocene of Japan and its phylogenetic rela-tionships. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32: 1157–1171.

Murakami, M., Shimada, C., Hikida, Y., and Hirano, H. 2012b. Two new basal phocoenids (Cetacea, Odontoceti, Delphinoidea), from the upper Miocene Koetoi Formation of Japan and their phylogenetic signifi-cances. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32: 1172–1185.

Myrick, A.C., Jr. 1979. Variation, Taphonomy and Adaptation of the Rhab-dosteidae (Eurhinodelphidae) (Odontoceti, Mammalia) from the Calvert Formation of Maryland and Virginia. 347 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. Dis-sertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

Noble, B.A. and Fraser, F.C. 1971. Description of a skeleton and supple-mentary notes on the skull of a rare Porpoise Phocoena sinus Norris and McFarland 1958. Journal of Natural History 5: 447–464.

Norris, K.S. and McFarland, W.N. 1958. A new harbor Porpoise of the genus Phocoena from the Gulf of California. Journal of Mammalogy 39: 22–39.

Pallas, P.S. 1776. Reise durch verschiedene Provinzen des Russischen Reichs, Vol. 2. 796 pp. Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, St. Petersbourg.

Perrin, W.F. 1975. Variation of spotted and spinner porpoise (genus Stenella) in the Eastern Pacific and Hawaii. Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography 21: 1–206.

Perrin, W.F. 2001. Stenella attenuata. Mammalian Species 683: 1–8.Perrin, W.F. and Myrick, A.C., Jr. (eds.) 1980. Age determination of toothed

whales and sirenians. International Whaling Commission Special Issue 3: 1–229.

Pierce, K.V. and Kajimura, H. 1980. Acid etching and highlighting for de-fining growth layers in cetacean teeth. In: W.F. Perrin and A.C. Myrick, Jr. (eds.), Age Determination of Toothed Whales and Sirenians. Inter-national Whaling Commission Special Issue 3: 99–103.

Pilleri, G. and Siber, H.J. 1989. Piscorhynchus aenigmaticus, ein neuer Miozäner Zahnwal aus der Pisco-Formation Perus. In: G. Pilleri (ed.), Beiträge zur paläontologia der cetacean Perus, 193–218. University of Berne, Hirnanatomisches Institut, Berne.

Racicot, R.A., Deméré, T.A., Beatty, B.L., and Boessenecker, R.W. 2014. Unique feeding morphology in a new prognathous extinct porpoise from the Pliocene of California. Current Biology 24: 774–779.

Sagayama, T. and Hoyanagi, K. 1993. Neogene diatom biostratigraphy and sea-level fall around 10 Ma in northern Hokkaido, Japan [in Japanese, with English abstract]. Earth Science 47: 423–438

Shimada, C., Hikida, H., Hasegawa, S., and Nishino, T. 1998. Diatom age of calcareous concretions containing marine mammal fossil from Na-kagawa-cho, Northern Hokkaido [in Japanese, with English abstract]. Bulletin of the Nakagawa Museum of Natural History 1: 103–112.

Slijper, E.J. 1936. Die Cetaceen, Vergleichend-Anatomisch and System-atisch. Capita Zoologica 6–7: 1–590.

Slijper, E.J. 1961. Locomotion and locomotory organs in whale s and dol-phins (Cetacea). Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 5: 77–94.

Stacey, P.J., Leatherwood, S., and Baird, R.W. 1994. False killer whale. Mammalian Species 456: 1–6.

Stewart, B.E. and Stewart, R.E.A. 1989. Delphinapterus leucas. Mamma-lian Species 336: 1–8.

Swofford, D.L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and Other Methods. Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

Tomida, Y. and Kohno, N. 1992. Fossil marine mammals from the Koetoi Formation (middle Late Miocene to Early Miocene) in Wakkanai City, Northern Hokkaido, Japan [in Japanese, with English abstract]. Mem-oirs of the National Science Museum 25: 49–56.

True, F.W. 1885. On a new species of porpoise, Phocaena dalli, from Alas-ka. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 8: 95–98.

True, F.W. 1908. The fossil cetacean, Dorudon serratus Gibbes. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 52: 5–78.

Uyeno, T. 1992. Fossil Marine Fishes from the Koetoi Formation (Middle Late Miocene to Early Pliocene) in Wakkanai City, Northern Hokkai-do, Japan [in Japanese, with English abstract]. Memoirs of the Nation-al Science Museum 25: 41–48.

Werth, A.J. 2006. Mandibular and dental variation and the evolution of suction feeding in odontoceti. Journal of Mammalogy 87: 579–587.

West, K.L., Mead, J.G., and White, W. 2011. Steno bredanensis. Mamma-lian Species 43: 177–189.

Wilson, L.E. 1973. A delphinid (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the Miocene of Palos Verdes Hills, California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 103: 1–34.

Yanagisawa, Y. and Akiba, F. 1998. Refined Neogene diatom biostratig-raphy for the northwest Pacific around Japan, with an introduction of code numbers for selected diatom biohorizons. Journal of the Geolog-ical Society of Japan 104: 395–414.

Yasue, A., Akiba, F., Ohira, H., and Ishii, E. 2006. The upper Pliocene dia-tom zone and Fission-track age of the upper Koetoi Formation around the Sarobetsu anchcline, northern Hokkaido [in Japanese, with English abstract]. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan 112: 284–293.

Yoshida, H., Shirakihara, M., Takemura, A., and Shirakihara, K. 1994. De-velopment, sexual dimorphism, and individual variation in the skeleton of the finless porpoise, Neophocaena phocaenoides, in the coastal wa-ters of western Kyushu, Japan. Marine Mammal Science 10: 266–282.