New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an...
Transcript of New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an...
![Page 1: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating
sphere in an electromagnetic field.
Sergio Manzetti 1,2 and Alexander Trounev 1,3
1. Fjordforsk A/S, Bygdavegen 155, 6894 Vangsnes, Norway.
2. Uppsala University, BMC, Dept Mol. Cell Biol, Box 596,
SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
3. A & E Trounev IT Consulting, Toronto, Canada.
December 17, 2018
1
1 Abstract
Vortexes in three dimensional systems are an emerging topic of study in the
realm of quantum physics, particle physics and magnetism. In this study we de-
scribe a new Hamiltonian, and solve it numerically for the description of vortices
in a spherical model subjected to an electromagnetic field. The numerical anal-
ysis shows also that supersymmetric Hamiltonian describes quantized orbitals
for atomic systems with vorticity included, which is to our knowledge novel and
also describes electricity as composed of quasi-symmetric vortex bundles. Fur-
ther work on analytical solutions is under development. The 3D solutions of
1Please cite as: Sergio Manzetti and Alexander Trounev. (2019) ”Formation of quan-
tum vortices in a rotating sphere in an electromagnetic field.” In: Modeling of quantum
vorticity and turbulence with applications to quantum computations and the quantum Hall
effect. Report no. 142019. Copyright Fjordforsk A/S Publications. Vangsnes, Norway.
www.fjordforsk.no
1
![Page 2: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
the Hamiltonian are relevant for nuclear physics, in the physics of elementary
particles, in geophysics, and in the physics of stellar bodies.
2 Introduction
Three-dimensional vortex systems are used to model several phenomena in
physics, ranging from modeling sunspot-dynamics [1, 2, 3], cyclones and anti-
cyclones in planetary systems [2, 4, 5, 6], vortex formation in fluids and vortex
formation in quantum fluids and superfluids [7, 8]. Additionally, vortex mod-
els were the first to be proposed to describe the forces which hold the nuclear
subparticles together [9] and were later published and accepted as a ”center
vortices” [10], nevertheless not empirically demonstrated. The vortices oc-
curring at a subatomic level are defined as magnetic vortices or vortex fluxes
which are modelled by a Wilson loop, also known as the Wilson loop average
in nonperturbative quantum-chromodynamics [11]. In exonucelar systems, the
Gross-Pitaevskii equation is widely used to model the magnetic vortex behaviour
in Fermi holes and in superfluids [7, 8, 12, 13], where some studies provide also
exact solutions to the superfluid vortices [14]. In one study in particular [8]
the authors model bose-eisntein condensates (BECs) with induced vorticity, by
applying a moving object with an elliptical paddle shape to create the vortices.
The authors use the Gross-Pitaevskii equation and generate a spherical sys-
tem with vortices formed on the surface boundary. The authors generate hence
long-lived vortices which are randomly distributed with turbulence [8]. In an-
other study, Bradley and Anderson [15] model the Gross-Pitaevskii equation
numerically and introduce the concept of a clustered fraction for vortices, which
describes that vortices of the same sign cluster as nearest neighbours, which
has significant implications for vortex condensation and annihilation. We also
found of particular relevance the results of Chesler et al [16], who modelled
vortex dynamics in a 2D system by using holographic duality as a gravitational
description for the vortex-system where vortex condensation and annihilation
was described numerically. Chesler et al reported that the intervortex spacing
2
![Page 3: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
remains in the inertial range and vortices avoided condensation. In view of
these important results, we present a new model Hamiltonian which is solved
for numerical solutions in a spherical system, yielding a 3D description of the
formation of vortices on the surface of a sphere. This model differs from pre-
vious models in that it allows for the formation of vortices without symmetry
breaking, and includes both vortex-condensation as well as fixed intervortex
spacing in respect to specific energy levels [17, 18]. It is also, to our knowl-
edge, the first model of vortex formation on a spherical system, which describes
the dynamics of vortex formation in the same fashion as for two-dimensional
systems, as previously published [17, 18], regulated by an internal dipole field
located at the center of the rotating sphere. This model can be applied to any
level of physics, where vortices occur in a spherical regime, with a modulated
center-dipole field.
2.1 Supersymmetric Hamiltonian for vortex formation
We present here the derivation of the supersymmetric operator for vortex sys-
tems in a sphere or in a 2D system. We develop the operator from the model
published by Laughlin [19], who defined the Hamiltonian operator for anyons
as
H = |~/i∇− (e/c) ~A|2, (1)
where ~A = 12H0[xy − yx], is the symmetric gauge vector potential, where
H0 is the magnetic field intensity. However, presenting this treatise in a first
quantized formalism, we use the regular form:
H = [~/i∇− (e/c) ~A]2, (2)
where the Hamiltonian is simply the normal square of the covariant deriva-
3
![Page 4: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
tive. At this point, looking at the factorized form of (2):
H = [~/i∇− (e/c) ~A]× [~/i∇− (e/c) ~A]. (3)
we apply supersymmetry rules [20] on the two factorized components in eqn.
(3), and get the superpair of the Laughlin Hamiltonian:
HSUSY = [~/i∇− (e/c) ~A]× [−~/i∇− (e/c) ~A]. (4)
The SUSY counter-part of the Hamiltonian from (2) becomes therefore:
HSUSY = T T ∗, (5)
with
T = [~/i∇− (e/c) ~A], (6)
and
T ∗ = [−~/i∇− (e/c) ~A], (7)
where T and T ∗ are the superpair in the SUSY Hamiltonian in (4) and one
anothers complex conjugate.
We consider then T and T ∗, with γ = (e/c) ~A, in one dimension:
T =
[h
i
d
dx− γ · I
]
T ∗ =
[− h
i
d
dx− γ · I
].
which commute by the relation:
[T T ∗]− [T ∗T ] = 0 (8)
4
![Page 5: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
making T and T ∗ two commutating complex operators in Hilbert space H .
Both T and T ∗ are unbounded operators given the condition:
||T x|| c||x||, (9)
T and T ∗ are also non-linear given the γ constant, being a constant trans-
lation from the origin. T and T ∗ are non-self-adjoint in H as the following
condition is not satisfied:
〈T φ, ψ〉 = 〈φ, T ∗ψ〉, (10)
From this, it follows that:
HSUSY : D(HSUSY ) −→H ,
and
D(HSUSY ) ⊂H ,
where HSUSY is an unbounded linear and non-self-adjoint operator complex
on Hilbert space H = L2[−∞,+∞]. However, HSUSY is self-adjoint in its
domain, D(HSUSY ) on L2[a, b].
From supersymmetry theory in quantum mechanics [20] it follows that
H†Ψ = HΨ† = EΨ = EΨ†, therefore we can assume that:
HSUSY Ψ = EΨ, (11)
where E is the energy of the system, which generates the boundaries of
D(HSUSY ) on L2[0, L], where the interval of quantization (L) is contained in
the zero-point energy term E= n2~2π2
2mL2 .
5
![Page 6: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2.2 Numerical study of vorticity dynamics in a nonlinear
quantum system in an electromagnetic field
In Ref. [17, 18], we investigated the formation of vortices in a homogeneous
and alternating magnetic field within the framework of the modified Gross-
Pitaevskii model. To derive the basic equation, we used the supersymmetric
Hamiltonian in (4), which is a generalization of the well-known Hamiltonian
proposed by Laughlin [19] to describe the quantum fractional Hall effect. In
the present paper, we investigate the case of the 3D nonlinear quantum system in
an electromagnetic field. The corresponding equation in dimensionless variables
has the form:
∂ψ∂t = 1
2∇2ψ + iΩ(x∂ψ∂y − y
∂ψ∂x )− β|ψ|2ψ + ( ~A)2ψ (12)
Here ~A is a dimensionless vector potential, β,Ω - parameters of the model de-
scribing the number of particles and the angular momentum, respectively. Eq
(12) describes evolution of the wave function from some initial state ψ(x, y, z, 0) =
ψ0(x, y, z) and up to the state describing a certain number of vortices, which
depends mainly on the angular velocity Ω. In the case of a homogeneous mag-
netic field with ~B = B0(sin θ, 0, cosθ), we set ~A = [ ~B~r]/2. In the case of a
magnetic dipole ~m = m0(sin θ, 0, cosθ) and the electric charge q combined with
it, we assume scalar potential ϕ = 0, and the vector potential
~A(x, y, z, t) = − [~m~r]r3 −
qt~rr3
(13)
For the equation (12) we consider the problem of the decay of the initial
state, which we set in the form
ψ(x, y, z, 0) = exp[−(x2 + y2 + z2)/2] (14)
As boundary conditions, we will use the function of the initial state (14) given
on the boundaries of the computational domain. We note that for sufficiently
large dimensions of the domain this is equivalent to zero boundary conditions.
The amplitude of the wave function is shown in Fig 1-10, at different states
depending on parameters β,Ω, B0,m0, q, θ, and at a fixed linear size of the region
6
![Page 7: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
x2+y2+z2 ≤ 16. Fig. 1 shows the simulation data of the amplitude of the wave
function in cross section z = 0 at different times in a homogeneous magnetic
field with B0 = 2√
2, θ = 0, and for β = 100,Ω = 2. In this case, vorticity is
formed, and in Fig. 1.1, one can see the vorticity distribution in different cross
sections z = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, and in Fig. 1.2 shows the distribution
of vorticity in the volume of the sphere. We note that the final state is not
symmetric, which is due to the presence of a system of vortices interacting in
the volume of the sphere. Vortices begin and end on the surface of the sphere,
some of them have a horseshoe shape, others are stretched from one hemisphere
to another.
.
Figure 1. The amplitude of the wave function at different instants of time cal-
culated for z = 0 with Ω = 2, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2, θ = 0.
7
![Page 8: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
.
Figure 1.1 The amplitude of the wave function at different cross sections z =
0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 calculated for t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2, θ =
0.
8
![Page 9: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
.
Figure 1.2 The vorticity distribution in the volume of the sphere computed for
t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2, θ = 0.
It should be noted that vorticity is formed even at A = 0 - Fig. 2. However,
even if A2 > 0, then the main parameter influencing the vorticity is Ω. Fig.
2 shows the vorticity distributions in the volume of the sphere computed for
various Ω = 1.8, 2, 3 at t = 1 with β = 100, B0 = 0, 2√
2, θ = 0.In the case of
Ω = 1.8, 2, the vorticity is distributed throughout the volume, whereas at Ω = 3
the vortices are concentrated near the axis of rotation.
9
![Page 10: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
.
Figure 2 The vorticity distribution in the volume of the sphere computed for
t = 1 with Ω = 1.8, 2, 3;β = 100;B0 = 0, 2√
2; θ = 0.
Part of the calculations were performed for the modified model (12), in which
the sign of the term A2ψ changes to the opposite. In this case we have the Gross-
Pitaevsky model, in which vorticity under these conditions is not formed - Fig.
3-4. In Fig. 3 shows the distribution of the amplitude of the wave function
in the modified model (above) and in the model (12) - below, calculated for
t = 1 with parameters Ω = 1.8, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2; θ = 0. Fig. 4 shows the
10
![Page 11: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
distribution of the amplitude of the wave function calculated for t = 1 for the
values of the parameters Ω = 1.8, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2; θ = π/2 (in this case the
magnetic field is oriented perpendicular to the axis of rotation). From these
data it follows that in the modified model the wave function has the usual form
for quantum mechanics, while in the model (12) vortices are formed, distributed
over the volume of the sphere.
.
Figure 3. The amplitude of the wave function computed for t = 1 with Ω =
1.8, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2, θ = 0 in the modified model (above) and in the model
(12) - below.
11
![Page 12: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
.
Figure 4. The amplitude of the wave function computed for t = 1 with Ω =
1.8, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2, θ = π/2 in the modified model (above) and in the model
(12) - below.
In the case when the magnetic field perpendicular to the axis of rotation,
vortices appear that have the form of a spindle - Fig. 4. Fig. 4.1 shows the
simulation data of the amplitude of the wave function in cross section z = 0
12
![Page 13: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
at different times in a homogeneous magnetic field with B0 = 2√
2, θ = π/2,
and for β = 100,Ω = 2. In this case, vorticity is formed (while in the modified
model is not formed), and in Fig. 4.2, one can see the vorticity distribution in
different cross sections.
.
Figure 4.1 The amplitude of the wave function at different instants of time cal-
culated for z = 0 with Ω = 1.8, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2, θ = π/2.
.
Figure 4.2 The amplitude of the wave function at different cross sections z =
0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 calculated for t = 1 with Ω = 1.8, β = 100, B0 =
2√
2, θ = π/2.
13
![Page 14: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The change in the orientation of the magnetic field relative to the axis of
rotation affects significantly the vorticity distribution. In Fig. 5 shows the
amplitude of the wave function in the cross section z = 0 at different times
computed for Ω = 2, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2, θ = π/4. In Fig. 5.1 and 5.2 are the
vorticity distributions at the time t = 1 in different sections and in the volume
of the sphere.
.
Figure 5. The amplitude of the wave function at different instants of time cal-
culated for z = 0 with Ω = 2, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2, θ = π/4.
.
14
![Page 15: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Figure 5.1 The amplitude of the wave function at different cross sections z =
0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 calculated for t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2, θ =
π/4.
.
Figure 5.2 The vorticity distribution in the volume of the sphere computed for
t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100, B0 = 2√
2, θ = π/4.
2.3 Vorticity in a charged field
The process of vorticity formation in the dipole and charge field (Fig. 6-10)
differs substantially from the analogous process in a homogeneous magnetic
15
![Page 16: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
field (Fig. 1-5). In the magnetic dipole field a dense core is formed around
which a finite number of vortices are distributed - Fig 6-7. In Figs. 6 and 6.1
show the distribution of vorticity around the central nucleus in different cross
sections and in the volume of the sphere, calculated for t = 1 with parameters
Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 1, θ = 0, q = 0. In Fig. 6.2 shows the process of formation
of the central core and vortices in the cross section z = 0.
.
Figure 6 The amplitude of the wave function at different cross sections z =
0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 calculated for t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 1, θ =
0, q = 0.
16
![Page 17: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
.
Figure 6.1 The vorticity distribution in the volume of the sphere computed for
t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 1, θ = 0, q = 0.
17
![Page 18: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
.
Figure 6.1 The amplitude of the wave function at different t in cross sections
z = 0 calculated with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 1, θ = 0, q = 0.
As the intensity of the magnetic dipole increases, the density of the central
nucleus increases (Fig. 7). Changing the orientation of the axis of the magnetic
dipole relative to the rotation axis also affects the vorticity distribution. In Fig.
7 and 7.1 the vorticity distribution in different sections and in the volume of
the sphere is shown, and in Fig. 7.2 shows the formation of a dense core and
vortices in the cross section z = 0 at Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 12, θ = π/6, q = 0.
18
![Page 19: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
.
Figure 7 The amplitude of the wave function at different cross sections z =
0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 calculated for t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 12, θ =
π/6, q = 0.
19
![Page 20: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
.
Figure 7.1 The vorticity distribution in the volume of the sphere computed for
t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 12, θ = π/6, q = 0.
20
![Page 21: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
.
Figure 7.2 The amplitude of the wave function at different t in cross sections
z = 0 calculated with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 12, θ = π/6, q = 0.
In the field of the magnetic dipole and electric charge, a dense core is formed
on which vortices are closed (Fig. 8-9). In Fig. 8-9 shows the distribution of
vortices around a dense nucleus calculated at t = 1 with parameters Ω = 2, β =
100,m0 = 7, θ = 0, q = ±5. Vortices in this case have a pronounced funnel-
shaped form. In Fig. 8.1 and 9.1 shows the distribution of vortices in the cross
section z = 0, calculated at t = 1 with parameters Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 7, θ =
0, q = ±5. From the data in Fig. 8.2 and 9.2 it can be seen that the process of
forming a dense core and vortices occurs cyclically with a certain period.
21
![Page 22: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
.
Figure 8 The vorticity distribution around a dense nucleus computed for t = 1
with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 7, θ = 0, q = −5.
.
Figure 8.1 The amplitude of the wave function at different cross sections cal-
culated for t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 7, θ = 0, q = −5.
22
![Page 23: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
.
Figure 8.2 The amplitude of the wave function at different t in cross sections
z = 0 calculated with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 7, θ = 0, q = −5.
23
![Page 24: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
.
Figure 9 The vorticity distribution around a dense nucleus computed for t = 1
with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 7, θ = 0, q = 5.
.
Figure 9.1 The amplitude of the wave function at different cross sections cal-
culated for t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 7, θ = 0, q = 5.
24
![Page 25: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
.
Figure 9.2 The amplitude of the wave function at different t in cross sections
z = 0 calculated with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 7, θ = 0, q = 5.
The electric charge also forms a dense core (Figure 10), around which vortices
are distributed (Figure 10.1), and the process of formation of the nucleus and
vortices occurs cyclically (Figure 10.2). In Fig. 10 shows the distribution of
vortices around a dense nucleus in the field of a point charge computed at t = 1
with parameters Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 0, θ = 0, q = 12. In Fig. 10.1 and 10.2
show the amplitude of the wave function in different sections and at various
times calculated with the parameters as in Fig. 10.
25
![Page 26: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
.
Figure 9 The vorticity distribution around a dense nucleus computed for t = 1
with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 0, θ = 0, q = 12.
.
Figure 10.1 The amplitude of the wave function at different cross sections cal-
culated for t = 1 with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 0, θ = 0, q = 12.
26
![Page 27: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
.
Figure 10.2 The amplitude of the wave function at different t in cross sections
z = 0 calculated with Ω = 2, β = 100,m0 = 0, θ = 0, q = 12.
3 Discussion
By fig 4 we see preserved structural similarities between the p-orbitals in quan-
tum mechanics for atomic systems, and the same orbitals with vorticity formed
around their nodular shapes. Our model describes hence the magnetic field
formed around the orbitals of quantized systems, also accounting for the s-orbital
displayed in fig 3. Here also, the ground state is reproduced with and without
vorticity, showing how the vortex forms in the center of the spherical structure
of the s-orbital. This shows a validity of our model in describing quantized
electronic systems, and also potential subatomic magnetic behaviours. From fig
10.1 we observe another intriguing point of the SUSY Hamiltonian, where an
electric field also generates vortices, as magnetic fields do. This is to our knowl-
27
![Page 28: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
edge new, and normally vorticity is attributed only to magnetic fields. The
similarities between the vortic behaviour of electric field (Fig 10) and magnetic
field (Fig 6, 7) are such that the electric field vortexes are more structurally
order in quasi-symmetric ensembles than are magnetic field vortices. The impli-
cations of the model are also significant for describing subatomic forces, where
the evolution of the wavefunction displays a pulsating character, expanding and
contracting periodically.
4 Conclusions
From the results we see that the spherical solutions to the SUSY Hamiltonian
are good models for atomic and nuclear magnetic field structures. In particular,
it is the evolution of the wavefunction and the vorticity patterns which arouse
interest. The evolution of the wavefunction of vortices suggests that magnetic
fields in spherical systems pulsate from the center to the boundaries of the
sphere in harmonical fashion. The results are also showing that the model
Hamiltonian can be used to describe the nature of the magnetic field vortexes
around electronic orbitals, which is a significant addition to orbital physics and
quantum physics.
28
![Page 29: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
References
[1] EN Parker. Vortex attraction and the formation of sunspots. The Astro-
physical Journal, 390:290–296, 1992.
[2] MA Abramowicz, A Lanza, EA Spiegel, and E Szuszkiewicz. Vortices on
accretion disks. Nature, 356(6364):41, 1992.
[3] N Bello Gonzalez, F Kneer, and R Schlichenmaier. Shear and vortex mo-
tions in a forming sunspot-twist relaxation in magnetic flux ropes. Astron-
omy & Astrophysics, 538:A62, 2012.
[4] Morgan E O’Neill, Kerry A Emanuel, and Glenn R Flierl. Polar vortex
formation in giant-planet atmospheres due to moist convection. Nature
Geoscience, 8(7):523, 2015.
[5] Philip S Marcus. Numerical simulation of jupiter’s great red spot. Nature,
331(6158):693, 1988.
[6] Joel Sommeria, Steven D Meyers, and Harry L Swinney. Laboratory sim-
ulation of jupiter’s great red spot. Nature, 331(6158):689, 1988.
[7] Angela C White, Brian P Anderson, and Vanderlei S Bagnato. Vortices
and turbulence in trapped atomic condensates. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, page 201312737, 2014.
[8] Angela C White, Carlo F Barenghi, and Nick P Proukakis. Creation
and characterization of vortex clusters in atomic bose-einstein condensates.
Physical Review A, 86(1):013635, 2012.
[9] William Thomson. Ii. on vortex atoms. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin
Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 34(227):15–24, 1867.
[10] Reinhard Alkofer and Jeff Greensite. Quark confinement: the hard problem
of hadron physics. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics,
34(7):S3, 2007.
29
![Page 30: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
[11] Mikhail A Shifman. Wilson loop in vacuum fields. Technical report, Gosu-
darstvennyj Komitet po Ispol’zovaniyu Atomnoj Ehnergii SSSR, 1980.
[12] Weizhu Bao, Dieter Jaksch, and Peter A Markowich. Numerical solution
of the gross–pitaevskii equation for bose–einstein condensation. Journal of
Computational Physics, 187(1):318–342, 2003.
[13] Fabrice Bethuel, G Orlandi, and Didier Smets. Vortex rings for the gross-
pitaevskii equation. Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 6(1):17–
94, 2004.
[14] Lei Wu, Lu Li, Jie-Fang Zhang, Dumitru Mihalache, Boris A Malomed,
WM Liu, et al. Exact solutions of the gross-pitaevskii equation for sta-
ble vortex modes in two-dimensional bose-einstein condensates. Physical
Review A, 81(6):061805, 2010.
[15] Ashton S Bradley and Brian P Anderson. Energy spectra of vortex dis-
tributions in two-dimensional quantum turbulence. Physical Review X,
2(4):041001, 2012.
[16] Paul M Chesler, Hong Liu, and Allan Adams. Holographic vortex liquids
and superfluid turbulence. Science, 341(6144):368–372, 2013.
[17] Sergio Manzetti and Alexander Trounev. Supersymmetric hamiltonian and
vortex formation model in a quantum nonlinear system in an inhomoge-
neous electromagnetic field. Submitted, 2018.
[18] Sergio Manzetti and Alexander Trounev. Derivation of a hamiltonian for
formation of particles in a rotating system subjected to a homogeneous
magnetic field. Submitted, 2018.
[19] Robert B Laughlin. Anomalous quantum hall effect: an incompressible
quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations. Physical Review Let-
ters, 50(18):1395, 1983.
30
![Page 31: New Formation of quantum vortices in a rotating sphere in an …uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1294342/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2019. 3. 7. · remains in the inertial range and vortices](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052104/603f5c258f7f882001581c04/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
[20] Fred Cooper, Avinash Khare, and Uday Sukhatme. Supersymmetry and
quantum mechanics. Physics Reports, 251(5-6):267–385, 1995.
31
View publication statsView publication stats