New 2016 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Standards: What...
Transcript of New 2016 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Standards: What...
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
New 2016 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey
Standards: What Attorneys Need to Know Leveraging the Feasibility Assessment Tool for Land Development Deals
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
MONDAY, JANUARY 25, 2016
Gary R. Kent, P.S., Integrated Services Director, The Schneider Corporation, Indianapolis
Jeffery N. Lucas, Esq., President, Lucas & Company, Birmingham, Ala.
Tips for Optimal Quality
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-866-873-1442 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can
address the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Continuing Education Credits
In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your
participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance
Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar.
A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email
that you will receive immediately following the program.
For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926
ext. 35.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Program Materials
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the ^ symbol next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides for today's program.
• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Strafford Publications
Webinar January 25, 2016
Presented by Gary R. Kent, PS and Jeffery Lucas, JD, PS
The New ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Standards
~ What Attorneys need to Know ~
5
1962
1986
1988
1992
1997
1999
2005
2011
2016 – February 23, 2016
The ALTA/ACSM (NSPS) Standards
6
• 2 year process
• Multiple meetings of ALTA and NSPS committees separately
• Final joint meeting of both committees
• ALTA – 10 members
• NSPS – typically 15 surveyors at committee meeting (300+ indirect participants)
The ALTA/ACSM (NSPS) Standards
7
• Section 1- Purpose
• Section 2- Request for Survey
• Section 3 – Survey Standards & Standards of Care
• Section 4 – Records Research
• Section 5- Fieldwork
• Section 6 – Plat or Map
• Section 7 – Certification
• Section 8 – Deliverables
• Table A
The 2016 ALTA/NSPS Standards
8
• NSPS is the legal successor organization to ACSM
• The 2016 Standards are the next version of the former ALTA/ACSM standards
Preamble
9
…For a survey of real property, and the plat, map or record of such survey, to be acceptable to a title insurance company for the purpose of insuring title to said real property free and clear of survey matters … certain specific and pertinent information must be presented for the distinct and clear understanding between the insured, the client …, the title insurance company …, the lender, and the surveyor professionally responsible for the survey. [Emphasis added.]
Section 1 - Purpose
10
…In order to meet such needs, clients, insurers, insureds, and lenders are entitled to rely on surveyors to conduct surveys and prepare associated plats or maps that are of a professional quality and appropriately uniform, complete, and accurate. [Emphasis added.]
Section 1 - Purpose
11
Of course this begs the question:
What is a complete and accurate survey of real property?
What is Complete and Accurate?
12
…To that end, and in the interests of the general public, the surveying profession, title insurers, and abstracters, the ALTA and the NSPS jointly promulgate the within details and criteria setting forth a minimum standard of performance for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys. A complete 2016 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey includes: [Emphasis added, and a list of criteria follows.]
Section 1 - Purpose
13
The Standards also address the issue of an accurate survey, but before we go there, let’s consider the difference between precise measurements and accurate results:
Accuracy and Precision
14
• Accurate or accuracy is “to take care” to be “careful” to be “free from mistakes or errors.” An accurate statement, for instance, is a true statement, free of errors.
• In contrast…
• Precise is “characterized by precision, as in a measurement operation.” Precision is also gauged by the degree of repeatability a measurement has.
Quotes from Webster’s New World College Dictionary
Accuracy and Precision
15
The terms accuracy and precision are often confused and used interchangeably, when they should not be, since they mean different things.
Precision has to do with refinement of measurement, while accuracy denotes nearness to the truth. [Emphasis added.]
Wilson, Donald A., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006, page 272.
Accuracy and Precision
16
“Bear in mind, however, that a 1 in 10,000 survey is not necessarily a better survey than one which is 1 in 5,000, it is merely a more precise survey.
The other consideration has to do with accuracy.
has to do with accuracy.
A 1 in 10,000 survey made of the wrong lot, or using the wrong corners or boundaries, may be very precise, but inaccurate and probably worthless. [Emphasis provided.]
Wilson, Donald A., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006, page 272
Accuracy and Precision
17
“That is one reason the courts have emphasized monumentation and the determination of correct boundaries rather than whether a survey was 1 part in 5,000 versus 1 part in 10,000.” [Emphasis added.]
Wilson, Donald A., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006, page 272
Accuracy and Precision
18
If the focus of a survey of property is to identify the true and correct property corners and the true and correct property lines, then an accurate survey would do that. Figure 1 shows that we have hit the bullseye, but the precision of our measurements is low.
Accuracy and Precision
19
In contrast, Figure 2 demonstrates that our measurements have a high degree of precision, but we missed the mark – the focus of the survey. We precisely measured the wrong piece of property. Our survey results are completely inaccurate but our measurements are highly precise.
Accuracy and Precision
20
• When you combine high accuracy with high precision, you get valid results. Results that are “well-grounded on principles or evidence; able to withstand criticism or objection, as an argument; sound.” Webster’s
• What do the Standards have to say about an accurate survey?
Accuracy and Precision
21
The boundary lines and corners of any property being surveyed as part of an ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey shall be established and/or retraced in accordance with appropriate boundary law principles governed by the set of facts and evidence found in the course of performing the research and fieldwork. [Emphasis added.]
Section 3.D. Boundary Resolution
22
Relative Positional Precision is a measure of how precisely the surveyor is able to monument and report those positions; it is not a substitute for the application of proper boundary law principles. A boundary corner or line may have a small Relative Positional Precision because the survey measurements were precise, yet still be in the wrong position (i.e., inaccurate) if it was established or retraced using faulty or improper application of boundary law principles. [Emphasis added.]
Section 3.E.iii. Measurement Standards
23
• When a surveyor performs an ALTA/NSPS survey and signs the certification, the surveyor is certifying to a “complete and accurate” survey of the subject property.
• This means an accurate identification of the true and correct corners and boundaries of the property; which, of course, implicates all adjoiners and coterminous property lines.
Accuracy and Precision
24
This is to certify that this map or plat and the
survey on which it is based were made in
accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard
Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land
Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted
by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items
___________ of Table A thereof. The
fieldwork was completed on ___________ . [Emphasize added.]
Section 7 - Certification
25
• All of this implicates at least two more questions.
• The first question is what are the “appropriate boundary law principles?”
Boundary Law Principles
26
• Adverse Possession – Title & Location Doctrine
• Common Grantor Doctrine – Location
• Doctrine of Monumentation – Location
• Original Surveyor/Following Surveyor – Location
• Acquiescence – Location
• Oral Agreement - Location
• Practical Location – Location
• Repose – Location
• Estoppel – Location
• Junior/Senior Conveyances – Location Issue
Appropriate Boundary Law Principles
27
• The second question is, what happens if the surveyors doesn’t/ understand the difference between accurate results and precise measurements, and certifies to an accurate survey that precisely identifies the wrong monuments and the wrong boundaries?
Accuracy and Precision
28
• Most other standards across the country have confused these concepts (as Don Wilson discussed), and actually define “accuracy” by the precision of the survey measurements.
Accuracy and Precision
29
2015 Mississippi Standard of Practice
30
2015 Mississippi Standard of Practice
31
• Let’s take that question one step further.
• Let’s say the title company removes the survey exception from the title policy based on the idea that it has received an accurate survey, when it has not.
Accuracy and Precision
32
• What happens when the title company has to pay a claim out on the policy when it is discovered that there is, in fact, an encroachment that would have been discovered had the survey been accurate as opposed to merely having precise measurements?
Accuracy and Precision
33
“Wolfe, the original owner, testified that he watched Wegner place the original stakes and that the stakes were in the same location when he sold the property to the Hannemans and when he showed the stakes to the realtor involved in the Hanneman/Geiger transaction. Thiessen [the following surveyor] testified that because the pipe did not meet his accuracy [precision] expectations, he decided not to use it as a boundary marker.
Gilbert v. Geiger, 2008 Wisc.App. LEXIS 21 (Wisc.App.2008)
Accuracy and Precision
34
An ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey must include:
i. Section 5 fieldwork
ii. Section 6 plat or map (including relationship to record documents)
iii. Table A items selected by client
iv. Certification in Section 7
Section 1 - Purpose
35
• Written authorization
• Dealing with atypical properties – e.g., trailer parks, marinas, campgrounds
– Non-fee interests
•Easements
•Leases
• Discuss scope with affected parties
Section 2 – Request for Survey
36
A. Effective Date 2/23/16
B. Compliance with jurisdictional requirements
– Conflicts with other standards
C. There is a normal standard of care
Section 3 – Survey Standards, etc.
37
E. Measurement Standards
ii. Uncertainties in location
– Due to reference monumentation
– Due to record documents
– Due to occupation/possession that differs from the record lines
– Relative positional precision
Section 3 – Survey Standards, etc.
38
Request to set forth:
• Record description of property to be surveyed
• Record description of parent tract if original survey
Section 4 – Records Research
39
Surveyor must be provided with:
i. Most recent title commitment (or other acceptable title evidence)
ii. Certain record documents
– Adjoiners
– Easements benefitting surveyed property (Schedule A appurtenant easements)
– Easements burdening the property (Schedule B2 easements)
iii. Unrecorded documents if desired by client
Section 4 – Records Research
40
If documents are not provided, or if non-public or quasi-public documents are required to complete the survey, the surveyor shall conduct only that research:
• required pursuant to the statutory or administrative requirements of the jurisdiction where the property is located
• negotiated in the contract
Section 4 – Records Research
41
A. Monuments
B. Rights of way and access
C. Lines of possession and improvements along the boundaries
D. Buildings
E. Easements and servitudes
F. Cemeteries
G. Water features
Section 5 – Fieldwork
42
B. Rights of way and access
ii. Name of ways abutting the property, and location of edges of traveled way except when no access
Section 5 – Fieldwork
43
E. Easements and Servitudes
iv. Evidence observed on and above the property of utilities on, over and beneath the property (with examples)
[formerly optional Table A item 11(a)]
Section 5 – Fieldwork
44
A. Evidence and locations gathered pursuant to the Section 5 Fieldwork
B. Boundary, Descriptions, Dimensions and Closure
C. Easements, Servitudes, Rights of Way, Access and Documents
D. Presentation
Section 6 – Plat or Map
45
B. Boundary, Description, Dimensions, Closures
ii. New Descriptions
• Why was a new description prepared?
• Avoid new descriptions unless deemed necessary and appropriate
• How the new description relates to the record
• Same as?
• How does it differ?
Section 6 – Plat or Map
46
C. Easements, Servitudes, Rights of Way, Access and Documents
ii. Summary of all rights of way, easements & servitudes
• Burdening surveyed property
• If evidence of same was provided to the surveyor
• Record information, whether shown or not and a note if:
Section 6 – Plat or Map
47
(a) Location cannot be determined from record
(b) No observed evidence
(c) blanket easement
(d) Not on or touching surveyed property
(e) Limits access
(f) Documents are illegible
(g) Surveyor has info that it has been released or terminated
Section 6 – Plat or Map
48
Only the unaltered certificate contained in Section 7
• Except as required pursuant to Section 3.B. (local or state requirements)
• Date of fieldwork
• Date of plat/map
Section 7 – Certification
49
• Copies to client and title company
• Other copies as negotiated
• Durable, dimensionally stable material
• Digital image in addition to, or in lieu of, hard copies pursuant to terms of the contract
• If recordation or filing required, produced in recordable form and recorded or filed
Section 8 – Deliverables
50
• Twenty (20) items
• Number additional items 21(a), 21(b), etc.
• Additional items explained (see Section 6.D.ii.(g))
• An ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey is not an engineering design survey
Table A
51
6. Zoning
a) If set forth in zoning report/letter provided to the surveyor by client
List:
• Zoning classification
• Setback requirements
• Height and floor space area restrictions
• Parking requirements
Identify date and source of report/letter
Table A
52
6. Zoning
b) If set forth in zoning report/letter provided to the surveyor by client and if no interpretation is required by the surveyor
Graphically depict:
• Setback requirements
Identify date and source of report/letter
Table A
53
11. Utilities
Location of utilities on or serving the property as determined by:
a) Observed evidence (see Section 5.E.iv.)
b) Plans requested by surveyor and obtained from utility companies or provided by client (reference source)
c) Markings requested by surveyor pursuant to 811 or similar utility locate request
Table A
54
11. Utilities
• Representative examples
• See “Note to client, insurer and lender”
• Without excavation, info may be incomplete, inaccurate and unreliable
• Utility locate requests may be ignored or result in incomplete markings
Table A
55
18. Wetlands
• If there has been a field delineation of wetlands conducted by a qualified wetlands specialist hired by the client, surveyor will locate observed delineation markers
Table A
56
19. Offsite (appurtenant) easements
• If plottable, include as part of the survey pursuant to Sections 5 and 6 and applicable Table A items.
• Client to obtain necessary permissions
Table A
57