Negotiation Strategies
-
Upload
bart-greenberg -
Category
Business
-
view
6.678 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Negotiation Strategies
Negotiating Skills and TechniquesNegotiating Skills and Techniques
Presented by Bart Greenberg
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Continuing Legal Education
Presented by Bart Greenberg
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Continuing Legal Education
Bridging the Gap . . . Business Issues
Bridging the Gap . . . Business Issues
3
Can a “Simple” Solution Be Reached?Can a “Simple” Solution Be Reached? Splitting the Pig Trading Terms One Side “Blinks” or “Caves” “Trust Me” or “Wink-Wink,
Nudge, Nudge”• Typical where one party does
not want deal terms reduced to writing
• Consider the “CYA” Letter
Splitting the Pig Trading Terms One Side “Blinks” or “Caves” “Trust Me” or “Wink-Wink,
Nudge, Nudge”• Typical where one party does
not want deal terms reduced to writing
• Consider the “CYA” Letter
4
“Trust Me” Example 1:“Trust Me” Example 1:
Merchant Banker Purchases Stock in Client with 50% Nonrecourse Note
“Understanding” that Client Would Forgive Remaining 50% Recourse Portion of Note
Client Goes Bankrupt and Merchant Banker Sued by Trustee for Recourse Portion of Note
Merchant Banker Purchases Stock in Client with 50% Nonrecourse Note
“Understanding” that Client Would Forgive Remaining 50% Recourse Portion of Note
Client Goes Bankrupt and Merchant Banker Sued by Trustee for Recourse Portion of Note
5
“Trust Me” Example 2:“Trust Me” Example 2:
To Accommodate Investor Tax Position, Documents Will Not Show That Shares Are Being Issued, in Part, for Services
Investor Breaches its Obligations Under Development Agreement
Client Unable to Claw Back the Shares
To Accommodate Investor Tax Position, Documents Will Not Show That Shares Are Being Issued, in Part, for Services
Investor Breaches its Obligations Under Development Agreement
Client Unable to Claw Back the Shares
6
“Trust Me” Example 3:“Trust Me” Example 3:
In 1990, Client Agrees to Accept 49% of Shares In Order to Make Company Available for Minority Owned Status
From 1990 through 2003, K-1 Reports That Each Shareholder Has 50% Interest
Since 2004, K-1 Allocates Ownership 49% and 51%
In 1990, Client Agrees to Accept 49% of Shares In Order to Make Company Available for Minority Owned Status
From 1990 through 2003, K-1 Reports That Each Shareholder Has 50% Interest
Since 2004, K-1 Allocates Ownership 49% and 51%
7
Will More “Creative” Thinking Help?Will More “Creative” Thinking Help? What is Creative Thinking?
• Getting from Point “A” to Point “B” by method not commonly used or known
• Definition of Point “B” is key• Substantive knowledge must
then be applied to determine the path
What is Creative Thinking?• Getting from Point “A” to
Point “B” by method not commonly used or known
• Definition of Point “B” is key• Substantive knowledge must
then be applied to determine the path
8
Examples of “Creative” Thinking:Examples of “Creative” Thinking: Consider These Point “B”s:
• Getting shares to the CEO at no cost in order to start the capital gains clock but without causing a taxable event
• Protecting Buyer with reasonable indemnification rights, but at the same time allowing Seller to sleep at night
• Funding Target before Buyer has completed its due diligence
Consider These Point “B”s:• Getting shares to the CEO at no
cost in order to start the capital gains clock but without causing a taxable event
• Protecting Buyer with reasonable indemnification rights, but at the same time allowing Seller to sleep at night
• Funding Target before Buyer has completed its due diligence
9
If Creative Thinking Won’t Help . . .If Creative Thinking Won’t Help . . . Reasonable Parties are
Typically Able to Resolve Business Issues
If Parties are Not Able to Resolve Business Issues, Is Something Else Preventing Compromise?
Reasonable Parties are Typically Able to Resolve Business Issues
If Parties are Not Able to Resolve Business Issues, Is Something Else Preventing Compromise?
Bridging the Gap . . .Unequal Bargaining Power
Bridging the Gap . . .Unequal Bargaining Power
11
Unequal Bargaining PowerUnequal Bargaining Power
Absence of Compromise May Be Attributable to a Party Believing That It Has Sufficient Leverage to Force its Position on Other Party
If so, and Negotiations Are Stalled, What Options Are Available?
Absence of Compromise May Be Attributable to a Party Believing That It Has Sufficient Leverage to Force its Position on Other Party
If so, and Negotiations Are Stalled, What Options Are Available?
12
Example of Unequal Bargaining PowerExample of Unequal Bargaining Power Client Has First Use of Trademark Multi-Billion Dollar Conglomerate
Infringes on Client’s Trademark Client’s Cease & Desist Letter to
Conglomerate is Rejected Client Unable to Devote Enough
Resources to Maintain Fight
Client Has First Use of Trademark Multi-Billion Dollar Conglomerate
Infringes on Client’s Trademark Client’s Cease & Desist Letter to
Conglomerate is Rejected Client Unable to Devote Enough
Resources to Maintain Fight
13
Example of Unequal Bargaining PowerExample of Unequal Bargaining Power Negotiated Buy-Out of Stock
Held By 44% Shareholder Fails Shareholder Files for Dissolution
and Shareholder’s Spouse Takes Active Role in Litigation
Spouse Unaware of the Nature of Certain Reimbursements
Shareholder Therefore Highly Motivated to Settle Litigation
Negotiated Buy-Out of Stock Held By 44% Shareholder Fails
Shareholder Files for Dissolution and Shareholder’s Spouse Takes Active Role in Litigation
Spouse Unaware of the Nature of Certain Reimbursements
Shareholder Therefore Highly Motivated to Settle Litigation
14
Techniques to Level the Playing FieldTechniques to Level the Playing Field Outsmarting Your Opponent Recognizing, and Negotiating
Within, Your Means Manipulating Your
Opponent’s “Greed”
Outsmarting Your Opponent Recognizing, and Negotiating
Within, Your Means Manipulating Your
Opponent’s “Greed”
15
Outsmarting Your OpponentOutsmarting Your Opponent
Your Opponent’s Position May Be Based on a Misunderstanding of Law
If so, and the Misunderstanding of Law Can Be Clearly Articulated to the Opponent, the Opponent May Be Forced to Moderate its Position
Your Opponent’s Position May Be Based on a Misunderstanding of Law
If so, and the Misunderstanding of Law Can Be Clearly Articulated to the Opponent, the Opponent May Be Forced to Moderate its Position
16
“Outsmarting” Example 1:“Outsmarting” Example 1:
Negotiated Buy-Out of Stock Held By Holders of 49% of Stock (One of Which is a Public Figure) Fails
Bylaws Indicate that Acts of Board Must be Unanimous
Bylaws Also Indicate that Quorum for Shareholder Meetings is 54%
Negotiated Buy-Out of Stock Held By Holders of 49% of Stock (One of Which is a Public Figure) Fails
Bylaws Indicate that Acts of Board Must be Unanimous
Bylaws Also Indicate that Quorum for Shareholder Meetings is 54%
17
“Outsmarting” Example 2:“Outsmarting” Example 2:
Start-Up Develops Supply Chain Software for Multi-Billion Dollar Conglomerate
Start-Up Wants to License Supply Chain Software to Third Parties
Counsel for Conglomerate Sends Cease & Desist Letter to Start-Up
Start-Up Develops Supply Chain Software for Multi-Billion Dollar Conglomerate
Start-Up Wants to License Supply Chain Software to Third Parties
Counsel for Conglomerate Sends Cease & Desist Letter to Start-Up
18
Staying Within Your MeansStaying Within Your Means
The Party With Less Negotiating Power Needs to Understand Its Limitations and Not Step Too Far Beyond the Point of Reason
This is Also Known as “Beggars Can’t Be Choosers”
The Party With Less Negotiating Power Needs to Understand Its Limitations and Not Step Too Far Beyond the Point of Reason
This is Also Known as “Beggars Can’t Be Choosers”
19
“Staying” Example 1:“Staying” Example 1:
Unstable Target Terminates LOI Because It Does Not Like Price
Target Incurs a Material Adverse Change
Target Informs Buyer that It Has 48 Hours to Close Sale or Target Will File for Bankruptcy
Buyer Closes Sale Within 48 Hour Period at 1/3 LOI Purchase Price
Unstable Target Terminates LOI Because It Does Not Like Price
Target Incurs a Material Adverse Change
Target Informs Buyer that It Has 48 Hours to Close Sale or Target Will File for Bankruptcy
Buyer Closes Sale Within 48 Hour Period at 1/3 LOI Purchase Price
20
“Staying” Example 2:“Staying” Example 2:
Diligence Reveals Outstanding Tax and Judgments Liens Against Target, But Target is Unwilling to Adjust Purchase Price
Target Breaches its Facility Lease, Landlord evicts Target and Enters Into New Lease with Buyer
Buyer Purchases Some of Target’s Assets at Fraction of LOI Price
Diligence Reveals Outstanding Tax and Judgments Liens Against Target, But Target is Unwilling to Adjust Purchase Price
Target Breaches its Facility Lease, Landlord evicts Target and Enters Into New Lease with Buyer
Buyer Purchases Some of Target’s Assets at Fraction of LOI Price
21
“Staying” Example 3:“Staying” Example 3:
Client Settles Patent Infringement Suit in 2004
Client Breaches Settlement in 2005.
Patent Holder Exacts “Pound of Flesh” in Connection with 2005 Settlement
Client Settles Patent Infringement Suit in 2004
Client Breaches Settlement in 2005.
Patent Holder Exacts “Pound of Flesh” in Connection with 2005 Settlement
22
Manipulating Your Opponents GreedManipulating Your Opponents Greed Party With Greater Bargaining
Power Must Recognize When Enough is Enough
In the Absence of Recognizing Such Limit, Excessive Greed on the Part of such Party May Serve to the Other Party’s Advantage
This is Also Known as “Pigs Get Fat, Hogs Get Slaughtered”
Party With Greater Bargaining Power Must Recognize When Enough is Enough
In the Absence of Recognizing Such Limit, Excessive Greed on the Part of such Party May Serve to the Other Party’s Advantage
This is Also Known as “Pigs Get Fat, Hogs Get Slaughtered”
23
“Hogs” Example 1:“Hogs” Example 1:
Client Focused on Revenue and Not Profitability
Customer Payable at $2 Million and No Written Contract in Place
Legal Counsel Advises Client to Stop Shipping Pending Agreement
Client Continues to Ship and Payable Reaches $4.5 million
Customer Files for Bankruptcy
Client Focused on Revenue and Not Profitability
Customer Payable at $2 Million and No Written Contract in Place
Legal Counsel Advises Client to Stop Shipping Pending Agreement
Client Continues to Ship and Payable Reaches $4.5 million
Customer Files for Bankruptcy
24
“Hogs” Example 2:“Hogs” Example 2:
Buyer Intends to “Grind” Seller at Closing for Price Adjustment
Buyer Unloads “Bombshell” at Closing
Buyer Neglects to Realize That Exclusivity Has Expired
Seller Takes Opportunity to Get Out of Deal with Buyer and Sells to Third Party in 48 hours
Buyer Intends to “Grind” Seller at Closing for Price Adjustment
Buyer Unloads “Bombshell” at Closing
Buyer Neglects to Realize That Exclusivity Has Expired
Seller Takes Opportunity to Get Out of Deal with Buyer and Sells to Third Party in 48 hours
Bridging the Gap . . .Personality IssuesBridging the Gap . . .Personality Issues
26
The Unsophisticated OpponentThe Unsophisticated Opponent Issue Mitigated by
Competent Counsel If No Counsel or Counsel
Does Not Mitigate: • Client Should Consider Offering
to Pay Portion of Opponent’s Legal Fees if It Hires Acceptable Counsel
Issue Mitigated by Competent Counsel
If No Counsel or Counsel Does Not Mitigate: • Client Should Consider Offering
to Pay Portion of Opponent’s Legal Fees if It Hires Acceptable Counsel
27
The Unsophisticated Opponent (cont.)The Unsophisticated Opponent (cont.) If Opponent Does Not Hire
Competent Counsel:• Client Should Assist Opponent• Client Should Ask Its Counsel to
Draft Opponent’s Deliverables• All Documents May Need to Be
“Dumbed Down”• Client Counsel Needs to Deliver
a CYA Letter
If Opponent Does Not Hire Competent Counsel:• Client Should Assist Opponent• Client Should Ask Its Counsel to
Draft Opponent’s Deliverables• All Documents May Need to Be
“Dumbed Down”• Client Counsel Needs to Deliver
a CYA Letter
28
“Unsophisticated Opponent” Example 1:“Unsophisticated Opponent” Example 1: Sample Provision:
• Seller acknowledges and agrees that, although Buyer and its legal counsel have assisted Seller in its preparation of the Disclosure Schedules, Seller has provided Buyer with all documents, agreements and other instruments that are responsive to each of the items to be disclosed in the Disclosure Schedule, Seller has read all of the Disclosure Schedules and fully understand the nature and contents thereof, and has been provided with an opportunity to comment and revise each of the Disclosure Schedules as it deems appropriate. Seller further represents and warrants that each of the Disclosure Schedules fully and accurately discloses all of the information required to be disclosed thereunder in order to ensure that the foregoing statements are true and complete and not misleading.
Sample Provision:• Seller acknowledges and agrees that, although
Buyer and its legal counsel have assisted Seller in its preparation of the Disclosure Schedules, Seller has provided Buyer with all documents, agreements and other instruments that are responsive to each of the items to be disclosed in the Disclosure Schedule, Seller has read all of the Disclosure Schedules and fully understand the nature and contents thereof, and has been provided with an opportunity to comment and revise each of the Disclosure Schedules as it deems appropriate. Seller further represents and warrants that each of the Disclosure Schedules fully and accurately discloses all of the information required to be disclosed thereunder in order to ensure that the foregoing statements are true and complete and not misleading.
29
The Unfriendly OpponentThe Unfriendly Opponent Typically Arises in a Distressed
Sale Situation (i.e., Not Voluntary)
Best Strategy Is To Communicate at the Attorney Level or Via E-Mail
If an “All-Hands” Meeting is Made Necessary, Consider Conference Call In Lieu of Physical Meeting
Typically Arises in a Distressed Sale Situation (i.e., Not Voluntary)
Best Strategy Is To Communicate at the Attorney Level or Via E-Mail
If an “All-Hands” Meeting is Made Necessary, Consider Conference Call In Lieu of Physical Meeting
30
“Unfriendly Opponent” Example 1:“Unfriendly Opponent” Example 1: Closing Due Diligence Uncovers
Significant Issue Tension Already in Room Due to
Prior Purchase Price Adjustments
Message Communicated Counsel to Counsel in “Side Bar”
Closing Occurs in Two Separate Conference Rooms
Closing Due Diligence Uncovers Significant Issue
Tension Already in Room Due to Prior Purchase Price Adjustments
Message Communicated Counsel to Counsel in “Side Bar”
Closing Occurs in Two Separate Conference Rooms
31
The “Difficult” CounselThe “Difficult” Counsel Opposing Counsel May Be
“Difficult” Due to Any of the Following:• Counsel is Not Competent in the
Relevant Field• Counsel is Overly Aggressive• Counsel Has Hidden Agenda
(e.g., Does Not Want to Lose Client) or Is Otherwise Disinterested
Opposing Counsel May Be “Difficult” Due to Any of the Following:• Counsel is Not Competent in the
Relevant Field• Counsel is Overly Aggressive• Counsel Has Hidden Agenda
(e.g., Does Not Want to Lose Client) or Is Otherwise Disinterested
32
The “Difficult” Counsel (cont.)The “Difficult” Counsel (cont.) Client May Want to Pay Portion
of Opponent’s Legal Fees if It Hires Acceptable Counsel
If Not . . . :• Encourage More Client to
Opponent Conversations (i.e., Bypass Counsel)
• Client May Want Its Counsel to Draft Opponent’s Deliverables
• “Dumb Down” Documents• Try All Hands Meeting so Client
Counsel Can Interface with Opponent
Client May Want to Pay Portion of Opponent’s Legal Fees if It Hires Acceptable Counsel
If Not . . . :• Encourage More Client to
Opponent Conversations (i.e., Bypass Counsel)
• Client May Want Its Counsel to Draft Opponent’s Deliverables
• “Dumb Down” Documents• Try All Hands Meeting so Client
Counsel Can Interface with Opponent
33
“Difficult Counsel” Example 1: “Difficult Counsel” Example 1: “Aint No Big City Lawyer
Gonna Tell Me What to Do!” Opponent Recognizes that Its
Legal Counsel is an Impediment
Client and Opponent Engage in Very Detailed Discussions With Each Counsel Only Working in the Background
“Aint No Big City Lawyer Gonna Tell Me What to Do!”
Opponent Recognizes that Its Legal Counsel is an Impediment
Client and Opponent Engage in Very Detailed Discussions With Each Counsel Only Working in the Background
34
The Intermeddling Prima Donna The Intermeddling Prima Donna Typically a Third Party to the
Transaction, Such as a Minority Shareholder, a High Performing Sales Person or Developer of IP, Makes Demands on Seller
Critical Decision is When Client or Opponent Should Negotiate With the “Terrorist”
Typically a Third Party to the Transaction, Such as a Minority Shareholder, a High Performing Sales Person or Developer of IP, Makes Demands on Seller
Critical Decision is When Client or Opponent Should Negotiate With the “Terrorist”
35
“Intermeddling” Example 1:“Intermeddling” Example 1:
Minority Shareholder Develops and Hosts Client’s Web Site
Disgruntled Minority Shareholder Breaches Development Agreement and Alleges Misconduct on Part of Controlling Shareholder
Harassed Controlling Shareholder Puts Company Up for Sale
Minority Shareholder Extracts Unfair Share of Purchase Price
Minority Shareholder Develops and Hosts Client’s Web Site
Disgruntled Minority Shareholder Breaches Development Agreement and Alleges Misconduct on Part of Controlling Shareholder
Harassed Controlling Shareholder Puts Company Up for Sale
Minority Shareholder Extracts Unfair Share of Purchase Price
36
“Intermeddling” Example 2:“Intermeddling” Example 2:
Seller’s Highest Performing Sales Person Is Encouraged by Wealthy Boyfriend to Renegotiate Comp. Package on Day of Closing
Buyer and Seller Each Contribute to Comp. Package to Get the Deal Done
Seller’s Highest Performing Sales Person Is Encouraged by Wealthy Boyfriend to Renegotiate Comp. Package on Day of Closing
Buyer and Seller Each Contribute to Comp. Package to Get the Deal Done
37
“Intermeddling” Example 3:“Intermeddling” Example 3:
Opponent, a 50% Shareholder, Seeks Unfair Reimbursements from Client, Who Is the Other 50% Shareholder
Opponent Shows No Flexibility, So Client Resigns as Employee, Officer and Director and then Establishes Competing Business
Parties Settle for $5,000
Opponent, a 50% Shareholder, Seeks Unfair Reimbursements from Client, Who Is the Other 50% Shareholder
Opponent Shows No Flexibility, So Client Resigns as Employee, Officer and Director and then Establishes Competing Business
Parties Settle for $5,000
Bridging the Gap . . .Communication Methods
Bridging the Gap . . .Communication Methods
39
E-Mail CorrespondencesE-Mail Correspondences
Highly Efficient and User Friendly Somewhat Impersonal and Tone is
Capable of Being Misunderstood Attachment Size and Filter Issues Understand and Manage the Risks
of “Reply All” and E-mail Cache Confidentiality and Related Use of
Document Protect and Encryption Unwanted Metadata in
Attachments
Highly Efficient and User Friendly Somewhat Impersonal and Tone is
Capable of Being Misunderstood Attachment Size and Filter Issues Understand and Manage the Risks
of “Reply All” and E-mail Cache Confidentiality and Related Use of
Document Protect and Encryption Unwanted Metadata in
Attachments
40
Conference CallsConference Calls
Most Typically Used as a Side Bar or Going Over Business Issues
E-Mail Communication Typically Used to Posture and Frame Issues to Be Discussed
Can’t See “Body Language” and “Multi-Tasking” May Affect Focus
Beware Side Bars Upon a Failure to Properly Disconnect
Most Typically Used as a Side Bar or Going Over Business Issues
E-Mail Communication Typically Used to Posture and Frame Issues to Be Discussed
Can’t See “Body Language” and “Multi-Tasking” May Affect Focus
Beware Side Bars Upon a Failure to Properly Disconnect
41
“Face-to-Face” Meetings“Face-to-Face” Meetings
Time Consuming and Expensive Typically Used as a Last Resort to
Steer the Deal Back on Track Consider Using a “Lock the Door
and Nobody Leaves” Approach to Move the Deal More Quickly
Allows Client Counsel to “Bypass” Opponent’s Counsel
Time Consuming and Expensive Typically Used as a Last Resort to
Steer the Deal Back on Track Consider Using a “Lock the Door
and Nobody Leaves” Approach to Move the Deal More Quickly
Allows Client Counsel to “Bypass” Opponent’s Counsel
42
The “Formal” LetterThe “Formal” Letter
Due to the Overwhelming Use of E-mail Correspondences, Reserve the Use of Formal Letter for High Impact Statements
Due to the Overwhelming Use of E-mail Correspondences, Reserve the Use of Formal Letter for High Impact Statements
43
“Going Dark”“Going Dark”
Effective Tool for Determining How Badly Opposition Needs to do the Deal
Once Initiated, Essentially Turns Into a Game of Chicken
Effective Tool for Determining How Badly Opposition Needs to do the Deal
Once Initiated, Essentially Turns Into a Game of Chicken
44
The Form and Timing of ResponseThe Form and Timing of Response Response Time and Manner
Need to Be Calculated In Order to Not Message to Opponent that Client Was Willing to Give Up More
Response Time and Manner Need to Be Calculated In Order to Not Message to Opponent that Client Was Willing to Give Up More
Questions?Questions?
Negotiating Skills and TechniquesNegotiating Skills and Techniques
Thank you!
Presented by Bart GreenbergManatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
(714) [email protected]
Thank you!
Presented by Bart GreenbergManatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
(714) [email protected]