Necessity of development of (1) in-situ tritium detection technique
description
Transcript of Necessity of development of (1) in-situ tritium detection technique
Application of optical techniques for in situ surface analysis of carbon based
materials
T. Tanabe, Kyushu University Necessity of development of
(1) in-situ tritium detection technique
To determined where and how much tritium is retained at particular locations in tokamak
(2) in-situ removing technique
Different techniques will be required depending on tritium retaining materials and its concentration
9th ITPA meeting on SOL/divertor physics, Garching, May 7-10, 2007
Optical techniques can be in-situ surface analysis systems with assistance of optical fibers, mirrors and lens
• UV to Visible
Optical absorption/emission spectroscopy • Infrared to far-infrared
IR, FT-IR, Raman
• Laser light
Optical emission/absorption
Energy loss (Laser Raman)
Neutral particle emission (Thermal Desorption Spectrosocpy)
Ion emission (TOF-MASS)
Electron energy loss or electron emission spectroscopy can be used but require sophisticated energy analyzing systems in vacuum
• UV to Visible
Optical absorption/emission spectroscopy • Infrared to far-infrared
IR, FT-IR, Raman
In this work,
Application of
for carbon materials retaining hydrogen.
Lots of works have been done for thin films (a:C-H film) but not much for bulk carbon materials, because graphite is a conductor and opaque.
Need to analyze reflecting light,
which gives limited information of near surface region.
In-situ high resolution observation & diffraction
B c
5 nm
Initial
300s
1300s
1900s
000002
B c
HOPGFiber
Inte
nsi
ty [
a.u
.]
11001800 1600 1400 1200
Raman Shift (cm-1)
HOPG
B c
Laser Raman Spectra of Hydrogen ion irradiated HOPG
Electron diffraction
h
hs
s
D+ ion irradiation
Original Graphite layers
2D modificationDefect production in the layers
3D modificationDefect formation between the layers
AmorphousHomogenous in 3D
K. Niwase et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 191-194 (1992) 335-339
K. Niwase et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 191-194 (1992) 335-339
He+ irradiation D+ ion irradiation
Amorphous Amorphous
Substrate
Eroded area
Re-deposited layer
Raman Shift (cm-1)1800 1500 1200 800
Inte
nsi
ty [
a.u
.]
D peak(1355cm-1)G peak(1580cm-1)
Substrate
Eroded area
Re-deposited layer
Raman Shift (cm-1)1800 1500 1200 800
Inte
nsi
ty [
a.u
.]
D peak(1355cm-1)G peak(1580cm-1)
TiC/Inconel
TiC/Mo
Lower X-point divertor
Vacuum vessel
Inner strike region
Private flux region
Outer strike region
TiC/Inconel
TiC/Mo
Lower X-point divertor
Vacuum vessel
TiC/Inconel
TiC/Mo
Lower X-point divertor
Vacuum vessel
TiC/Inconel
TiC/Mo
Lower X-point divertor
Vacuum vessel
Inner strike region
Private flux region
Outer strike region
Inner strike region
Private flux region
Outer strike region
A schematic view of a poloidal-section
inboardinboard
Re-deposited layer
inboard Eroded area
JT-60: Open divertor tiles
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
deposited area
eroded area
0
50
100
150
FWH
M15
80 (G
-pea
k w
idth
) [cm
-1]
I1355
/I1580
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
20
40
60
80
Am
oun
t of
ret
enti
on h
ydro
gen
[1022
atom
s/m
2 ]
Th
ickness of re-d
eposited
layer(um)
60
80
100
120
140
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
deposited areaeroded area
FW
HM
1580
[cm
-1]
Su
rface temperatu
re(K)
Poloidal distance [mm]
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
20
40
60
80
Am
oun
t of
ret
enti
on h
ydro
gen
[1022
atom
s/m
2 ]
Th
ickness of re-d
eposited
layer(um)
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
20
40
60
80
Am
oun
t of
ret
enti
on h
ydro
gen
[1022
atom
s/m
2 ]
Th
ickness of re-d
eposited
layer(um)
60
80
100
120
140
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
deposited areaeroded area
FW
HM
1580
[cm
-1]
Su
rface temperatu
re(K)
Poloidal distance [mm]
Line analysis
8.8 4.4 2.9 2.2 1.8439.0Crystalline size [ nm ]
0
50
100
150
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
G-p
eak
Wid
th [
cm-1
]
D-peak/G-peak
deposited areaeroded area
○ Redeposited area
○ Eroded area
TEXTOR ALT-ll tile
100011001200130014001500160017001800
Inte
nsi
ty [
a.u
.]
Raman Shift [cm-1]
UnirradiatedUnirradiated
G peakG peak D peakD peak
700K700K
1200K(Eroded area)
1200K(Eroded area)
Irradiation with very high flux and high temperature at NAGDIS-II
Cooperation with Drs. Ohno and Takamura
10mm
1200K Irradiation
7.7×107.7×102626 /m /m-2-2
700K Irradiation
3.4×103.4×102626 /m /m-2-2
Mostly eroded
Eroded
Deposited
0
50
100
150
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Amorphous
FW
HM
1580
cm-1
I1355/I1580
9.09.0 4.54.5 3.03.0 2.02.0450450Crystalline size [ nm ] Crystalline size [ nm ]
700 K700 K(100eV)(100eV)
600 ~700K(25keV)
Ion implantation25keV
UnirradiatedUnirradiated
1200KDeposited area
Eroded area1200K
B. Disher, et al. Appl. Phys.Lett. 42(1983)636 G. Compagnini, Phys. Rev. B51(1995)11168
Wider band gap
Higher sp3 C
Optical absorption and band gap of a:C-H film
Absorption coeff. of three a:C-H film with different refractive index. Absorption edge of diamond is shown for comparison
IR regionCH stretch band
FT-IR spectra in the CH stretch band region of the VGCF after successive irradiations of 6.0, 3.0 and 1.0 keV H+ ions to saturation. (a) 373 K, (b) 623 K, (c) 823 K, (d) 923 K. The separated-band assignment, band frequency are indicated at the resolved bands.
Estimated relative CHx density in the hydrogen-ion implanted VGCF with or without the post-irradiation heat-treatment, as a function of the heat-treatment temperature
Ion irradiated carbon fiber (VGCF)
FT-IR spectra in the CH stretch band region
FT-IR Spectra of hydrogen implanted HOPG in reflection geometry
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
80012001600200024002800320036004000
Rel
ativ
e A
bsor
banc
e / A
rb.U
nit
Wavenumber / cm-1
1015 ion/cm2
1017 ion/cm2
1018 ion/cm2
※ Reference: HOPG
Gap widening
C-H Stretching
Polarized light
Reflected light
Standing wave
Sample
Conclusions Following techniques are probed to be useful for
in situ surface analysis of carbon materials
• Laser induced optical emission Need to understand ablation physics
• Laser Raman Spectroscopy determines micro-structure but hard to get H/C.
• Optical absorption Spectroscopy Band gap width could be related to H/C.
• FT-IR could give H/C but sill need to increase S/N.
0
2 104
4 104
Inte
nsit
y (
arb.
uni
ts )
C2
C
Nd:YAG532nm
C+
C2+
C
&C2+
C2+
&C2
C2
CC
C+
IL = 3.0x1011 W/cm2C2+
C+C+
C+
0
2 103
4 103
300 400 500 600 700 800 900Inte
nsit
y (
arb.
uni
ts )
Wavelength (nm)
C2 Nd:YAG 532nm
C2 C2 C2
IL = 3.0x1010 W/cm2
Laser induced visible light emission
SAR266
Emission from C2, C, C+ & C2
+
WAR266
Emission from C2
Y. Sakawa et al. J. Nucl. Mater. in press
0
1
2
3
0 400 800
C+Cn
+
IL = 2.3x1010 (W/cm2)
t2 (s2)
TO
FMS
Inte
nsit
y(a
rb. u
nits
)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
TO
FMS
Inte
nsit
y(a
rb. u
nits
)
C+ IL = 3.0x1011 (W/cm2)
Laser induced Time Of Flight Mass Spectrometry (TOFMS)
SAR266Emission of C+ , C2+ ions
WAR266Carbon clusters (Cn
+)
Y. Sakawa et al. J. Nucl. Mater in press