Necessary Outlines for Work

3
B. REGISTRATION 1a. system of continuing registration of voters --- Akbayan vs. COMELEC, G.R. no. 147066, March 26, 2001 2. Qualifications and disqualifications a. citizenship in re R.A. 9225 b. age c. residency --- Gayo vs. Verceles, 452 SCRA 504 (2005) --- Japzon vs. COMELEC, 576 SCRA 331 (2009) --- Asistio vs. Aguirre, 619 SCRA 518 (2010) d. disqualifications under R.A. 9189 3. Process of Registration a. illiterate or disabled applicants b. voter's identification c. Manual vs. Data Capture System 4. Types of applications which may be filed before the OEO - definition and procedure 5. Election Registration Board a. powers b. composition c. proceedings d. challenges 6. Deactivation of registration vs. cancellation 7. Petitions for inclusion and exclusion a. period b. jurisdiction c. proceedings 8. Voters excluded through inadvertence or registered with an erroneous or misspelled name, remedy 9. Double/Multiple Registration C. CANDIDACY definition: a. candidate b. certificate of candidacy c. guest candidate d. independent candidate e. nuisance candidate material representation- Justimbaste vs. Comelec GR no. 179413, 28 Nov 2003 qualifications and disqualifications a. residence/domicile classification of domicile to successfully effect a change of domicile Domino vs. Comelec, 310 SCRA 546 (1999) Marcos vs. Comelec, 248 SCRA 300 (1995) Perez vs. Comelec, 317 SCRA 641 (1999) Saya-Ang vs. Comelec, GR no. 155087, 28 November 2003 b. citizenship Fornier vs. Poe, GR no. 161824, 3 March 2004 Coquilla vs. Comelec, GR no. 151914, 31 July 2002 De Guzman vs. Comelec, GR no. 180048, 19 June 2009 Labo vs. Comelec, 176 SCRA 1 (1989) Caasi vs. Comelec, 191 SCRA 191 (1990)

description

differential outlining

Transcript of Necessary Outlines for Work

Page 1: Necessary Outlines for Work

B. REGISTRATION1a. system of continuing registration of voters--- Akbayan vs. COMELEC, G.R. no. 147066, March 26, 20012. Qualifications and disqualificationsa. citizenship in re R.A. 9225b. agec. residency--- Gayo vs. Verceles, 452 SCRA 504 (2005)--- Japzon vs. COMELEC, 576 SCRA 331 (2009)--- Asistio vs. Aguirre, 619 SCRA 518 (2010)d. disqualifications under R.A. 91893. Process of Registrationa. illiterate or disabled applicantsb. voter's identificationc. Manual vs. Data Capture System4. Types of applications which may be filed before the OEO - definition and procedure5. Election Registration Boarda. powersb. compositionc. proceedingsd. challenges6. Deactivation of registration vs. cancellation7. Petitions for inclusion and exclusiona. periodb. jurisdictionc. proceedings8. Voters excluded through inadvertence or registered with an erroneous or misspelled name, remedy9. Double/Multiple Registration

C. CANDIDACY

definition:a. candidateb. certificate of candidacyc. guest candidated. independent candidatee. nuisance candidate

material representation- Justimbaste vs. Comelec GR no. 179413, 28 Nov 2003

qualifications and disqualificationsa. residence/domicileclassification of domicileto successfully effect a change of domicileDomino vs. Comelec, 310 SCRA 546 (1999)Marcos vs. Comelec, 248 SCRA 300 (1995)Perez vs. Comelec, 317 SCRA 641 (1999)Saya-Ang vs. Comelec, GR no. 155087, 28 November 2003b. citizenshipFornier vs. Poe, GR no. 161824, 3 March 2004Coquilla vs. Comelec, GR no. 151914, 31 July 2002De Guzman vs. Comelec, GR no. 180048, 19 June 2009Labo vs. Comelec, 176 SCRA 1 (1989)Caasi vs. Comelec, 191 SCRA 191 (1990)

dual citizenship vs. dual allegianceMercado vs. Manzano, 307 SCRA 630 (1999)Lopez vs. Comelec, GR no. 182701, 23 July 2008

continuing nature of requirementsFrivaldo vs. Comelec, 174 SCRA 245 (1989)

filing of COCa. period

Page 2: Necessary Outlines for Work

b. placec. mannerd. ministerial duty of comelece. effect of

rule if more than 1 coc filedrule if vote is in favor of person who did not file coc

importance of a COC, a valid COC

withdrawal and substitutionMiranda vs. Abaya, 311 SCRA 617 (1999)Rulloda vs. Comelec, GR no. 154198, 20 Jan 2003

petition to deny due course to or to cancel a COCpetition to declare nuisance candidate

complaint for disqualification filed before election...filed after election and proclamation...filed after election but before proclamation

effect of disqualification case

Fermin vs. Comelec, GR no. 179695 and 182369, 18 December 2008

votes for candidates with disqualification caseremedy where candidate has been proclaimed

D. CAMPAIGN AND ELECTION PROPAGANDA

A. definition:a. election campaign/partisan political activityb. contributionc. expenditure

B. prohibited acts relative to election campaignC. lawful election propagandaNational Press Club v. Comelec, 207 SCRA 1 (1992)Adiong v. Comelec, 207 SCRA 712 (1992)Osmeña v. Comelec, 288 SCRA 447 (1998)D. Election SurveysE. equal access to media time and spaceF. regulation of election propagandaG. rallies and other political activitiesH. COMELEC space, poster area, time and information bulletinI. Prohibited contributions/soliciting of contributions/raising of fundsJ. prohibited donations by candidatesK. Statement of contributions and expensesPilar v. Comelec, 245 SCRA 750 (1995)