Near-infrared photometry of Venus Richard W. Schmude, Jr. Gordon State College.
-
Upload
mervin-summers -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of Near-infrared photometry of Venus Richard W. Schmude, Jr. Gordon State College.
Near-infrared photometry of Venus
Richard W. Schmude, Jr. Gordon State College
Overview
• Purpose of work• Introduction• Method and materials• Results• Conclusions
Purpose of work
• Determine Near-IR photometric model– J filter (wavelength = 1.25 mm)– H filter (wavelength = 1.65 mm)
• Look for changes
Introduction
IntroductionModified from Taylor (2014) The Scientific Exploration of Venus
Introduction: penetration
• J and H filters penetrate deep– Variation in lower clouds– Large scale meteorology– Super volcanoes?
Solar phase angle
Magnitude system
• Developed in ancient times
• The higher the magnitude the fainter the object
Equipment
Wavelength
SSP-4 photometer
• Filter wavelengths– J filter: 1.1 to 1.4 micrometers– H filter: 1.5 to 1.8 micrometers
Method
Measure comparison star↓
Measure Venus↓
Repeat 2 ½ more times
Star Magnitude: energy units
Voting Question
What is the purpose of this study?a. Record near-infrared images of Venusb. Monitor the near-infrared brightness of
Venusc. Monitor the brightness of Venus in
visible lightd. The purpose was not stated
Voting Question
What is the main instrument used in this study?a. CCD camerab. Near-infrared camerac. Hubble Space Telescoped. Gordon State College Observatory telescopee. SSP-4 photometer
Results: H filter brightness
0 80 160 240
-6
-5
-4
Days after Dec. 31.0, 2014
Bri
ghtn
ess
(mag
nit
ud
e)
Results: J filter brightness
0 80 160 240
-6
-5
-4
Days after Dec. 31.0, 2014
Bri
ghtn
ess
(mag
nit
ud
e)
Results
• Compute normalized brightness values– Venus-Sun distance = 1 astronomical unit– Venus-Earth distance = 1 astronomical unit
Astronomical unit = mean Earth-Sun distance
Normalized J(1,alpha) value
• J(1,alpha) = J – 5.0 × LOG(r × D)
where: J = measured J magnituder = Venus-Sun distance in auD = Venus-Earth distance in au
H filter normalized magnitude
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-6
-5
-4
-3
f(x) = 0.977331441952578 x² + 0.458496585567976 x − 5.27230468246382R² = 0.991648758578259
Solar phase angle/100 degrees
H(1
,alp
ha)
mag
nit
ud
es
J filter normalized magnitude
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
-6
-5
-4
-3
f(x) = 0.959919421878157 x² + 0.708036861679951 x − 5.37002894569564R² = 0.990398424449153
Solar phase angle/100 degrees
J(1,
alp
ha)
mag
nit
ud
es
Voting Question
As time progressed between January and early July, the normalized magnitude of Venus (J or H filter) _____________.
a. droppedb. rosec. remained the same
Voting Question
As time progressed between January and early July of 2015, the measured brightness of Venus ________________.
a. droppedb. rosec. remained the same
Voting Question
As the solar phase angle of Venus rises, the normalized magnitude ___________.
a. risesb. fallsc. remains the same
AlbedosFilter (Wavelength) Venus Mercury
V (0.55 mm) 0.67 0.132 R (0.7 mm) 0.69 ---I (0.9 mm) 0.57 ---J (1.25 mm) 0.60 0.22H (1.65 mm) 0.42 1.00
Albedos
0 1 20
0.5
1
MercuryVenus
Wavelength (micrometers)
Geo
met
ric
Alb
edo
Sources of Near IR radiation
• Reflected sunlight
• Thermal emission
Conclusions
• Preliminary brightness models constructed
• J and H filters do not penetrate to the surface
• Small variations
Acknowledgements
• R. Schmude would like to thank Gordon State College for a faculty development grant in 2014.
V, R and I albedos of Venus are from Mallama (2006) Icarus 182, p. 10.V albedo of Mercury is from Mallama (2002) Icarus 155, p. 253.