Ncri Poster

1
www.virtualpathology.leeds.ac.uk [email protected] www.youtube.com/ LeedsPathology @LeedsPathology Section of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds Methods FFPE blocks were created from six anonymised frozen faecal samples. The V4 (240 base pair product) and V6 (98 base pair product) regions of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified in FFPE samples. For frozen samples (including from 57 further samples) regions V2, V3, V5, V7/V8 were also amplified. Libraries were prepared from PCR product and samples submiTed for NGS using an Illumina MiSeq. QIIME soZware was used for analysis. The different bacterial phylum and genera present were collated for each sample group. Alpha (within sample) and beta (between sample) diversity were calculated. s Investigating the faecal microbiome in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) material Introduction The microbiome describes ‘the ecological community of commensal, symbio^c and pathogenic microorganisms that share our body space’ (1). Altered faecal microbiomes are present in a range of gastrointes^nal pathologies but their exact role in disease is not yet known (2,3). Currently research into the microbiome makes use of fresh or frozen samples. One poten^al method for rapidly expanding and diversifying research is the retrospec^ve study of formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples that contain faecal bacterial popula^ons. To inves)gate the feasibility of typing the microbiome in FFPE faecal samples and analyse how microbiome analysis varied when targe)ng different variable regions. Ivan Jobling, Morag Taylor, Caroline Young, Henry Wood, Phil Quirke Section of Pathology & Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds Conclusions This is the first study to apply NGS technology to FFPE faecal material. We have successfully produced microbiome data from FFPE material comparable to that from frozen samples. When targe)ng the V6 region there is a closer correla)on between frozen and FFPE samples than when targe)ng V4. We hypothesise that this is due to the shorter V6 region being less affected by DNA fragmenta)on. Microbiome analysis in frozen material is significantly affected by the variable region of the 16s rRNA gene targeted. It is clear that choice of material and variable region is important in microbiome studies and further research is needed to standardise best prac)se when studying the gut microbiome. Results Aim References 1. Lederberg J, McCray AT. 'Ome sweet 'omics - A genealogical treasury of words. Scientist. 2001 Apr 2;15(7):8. PubMed PMID: WOS: 000168167400002. 2. Greenblum S, Turnbaugh PJ, Borenstein E. Metagenomic systems biology of the human gut microbiome reveals topological shifts associated with obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012 Jan 10;109(2):594-9. PubMed PMID: 22184244. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3258644. 3. Chang JY, Antonopoulos DA, Kalra A, Tonelli A, Khalife WT, Schmidt TM, et al. Decreased diversity of the feacal microbiome in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2008 Feb 1;197(3):435-8. PubMed PMID: 18199029. PC1 7% Figure 2. Frozen and FFPE taxonomy bar graph. Graph showing the rela^ve abundances of bacteria at genera level. This shows that FFPE and frozen results for each individual correlate. However, a significant difference in beta diversity between FFPE and frozen samples was found. Results correlated beTer between FFPE and frozen when targe^ng V6 compared to V4. Seven out of forty nega^ve controls were contaminated. These are dis^nguishable on this graph from each other and the faecal samples. It is possible to successfully amplify the 16S rRNA gene from FFPE faecal material. Targe)ng the shorter V6 region of the 16S rRNA gene gives closer results between FFPE and frozen samples than when targe)ng the V4 region. Figure 3. Alpha diversity. Rarefac^on chart showing the difference in within sample diversity between FFPE and frozen samples against sequences per sample. There is a significant difference between V4 FFPE and frozen samples (p = 0.05) but not V6. Figure 4. Taxonomy area graphs. Area graphs showing the rela^ve abundances of bacteria at phylum and genera level according to variable region of 16S rRNA gene targeted. The listed phyla varied in abundance significantly dependent on region targeted (p = < 0.002). Figure 1. Gel electrophoresis. Gel showing amplifica^on of the V6 region of the 16S rRNA gene in FFPE and frozen faecal samples. Reference ladders contain DNA strands 50 base pairs (bp) apart in size. Nega^ve and posi^ve controls shown. Figure shows that it is possible to successfully amplify the 16S rRNA gene from FFPE faecal material. 50 bp ladder 50 bp ladder 50 bp ladder 50 bp ladder Phylum Genera Phylum with abundance over 1% V4 frozen samples 1-6 V4 FFPE samples 1-6 V6 FFPE samples 1-6 V6 Frozen samples 1-6 V6 Negative controls (4/20 produced libraries) V4 Negative controls (3/20 produced libraries) V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7/V8 Phylum Genera Phyla listed had significantly different abundance dependent on variable region of 16S rRNA gene targeted. Figure 5. Alpha diversity of frozen samples according to variable region targeted. Graph shows significant differences between all variable regions targeted with shorter regions detec^ng less diversity (p < 0.001). Data from frozen samples varied significantly based on the varible region targeted. Longer regions tended to detect a higher level of alpha diversity.

description

Can we investigate the microbiome in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens.

Transcript of Ncri Poster

Page 1: Ncri Poster

www.virtualpathology.leeds.ac.uk [email protected]

www.youtube.com/LeedsPathology @LeedsPathology

Section of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds

Methods

•  FFPE   blocks   were   created   from   six  anonymised  frozen  faecal  samples.    

•  The   V4   (240   base   pair   product)   and   V6   (98  base   pair   product)   regions   of   the   16S   rRNA  gene  were  amplified  in  FFPE  samples.  

•  For  frozen  samples  (including  from  57  further  samples)  regions  V2,  V3,  V5,  V7/V8  were  also  amplified.  

•  Libraries   were   prepared   from   PCR   product  and   samples   submiTed   for   NGS   using   an  Illumina  MiSeq.    

•  QIIME   soZware   was   used   for   analysis.   The  different   bacterial   phylum   and   genera  present  were  collated  for  each  sample  group.  Alpha   (within   sample)   and   beta   (between  sample)  diversity  were  calculated.  s

Investigating the faecal microbiome in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) material

Introduction  

•  The   microbiome   describes   ‘the  e c o l o g i c a l   c o mm u n i t y   o f  c ommen s a l ,   s ymb i o ^ c   a n d  pathogenic   microorganisms   that  share  our  body  space’  (1).    

•  Altered   faecal   microbiomes   are  present  in  a  range  of  gastrointes^nal  pathologies   but   their   exact   role   in  disease  is  not  yet  known  (2,3).  

•  Current ly   research   in to   the  microbiome   makes   use   of   fresh   or  frozen  samples.    

•  One   poten^al   method   for   rapidly  expanding   and   diversifying   research  is  the  retrospec^ve  study  of  formalin  fixed   paraffin   embedded   (FFPE)  samples  that  contain  faecal  bacterial  popula^ons.  

   

To  inves)gate  the  feasibility  of  typing  the  microbiome  in  FFPE  faecal  samples  and  analyse  how  microbiome  analysis  varied  when  targe)ng  different  variable  regions.    

Ivan Jobling, Morag Taylor, Caroline Young, Henry Wood, Phil Quirke

Section of Pathology & Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds

Conclusions

•  This  is  the  first  study  to  apply  NGS  technology  to  FFPE  faecal  material.    

•  We  have  successfully  produced  microbiome  data  from  FFPE  material  comparable  to  that  from  frozen  samples.  

•  When  targe)ng  the  V6  region  there  is  a  closer  correla)on  between  frozen  and  FFPE  samples  than  when  targe)ng  V4.    We  hypothesise  that  this  is  due  to  the  shorter  V6  region  being  less  affected  by  DNA  fragmenta)on.  

•  Microbiome  analysis  in  frozen  material  is  significantly  affected  by  the  variable  region  of  the  16s  rRNA  gene  targeted.  

•  It   is   clear   that   choice  of  material   and   variable   region   is   important   in  microbiome   studies   and   further   research   is  needed  to  standardise  best  prac)se  when  studying  the  gut  microbiome.  

Results

Aim

References

1.  Lederberg J, McCray AT. 'Ome sweet 'omics - A genealogical treasury of words. Scientist. 2001 Apr 2;15(7):8. PubMed PMID: WOS:000168167400002.

2.  Greenblum S, Turnbaugh PJ, Borenstein E. Metagenomic systems biology of the human gut microbiome reveals topological shifts associated with obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012 Jan 10;109(2):594-9. PubMed PMID: 22184244. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3258644.

3.  Chang JY, Antonopoulos DA, Kalra A, Tonelli A, Khalife WT, Schmidt TM, et al. Decreased diversity of the feacal microbiome in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2008 Feb 1;197(3):435-8. PubMed PMID: 18199029.

PC1 7%

Figure  2.    Frozen  and  FFPE  taxonomy  bar  graph.  Graph  showing  the  rela^ve  abundances  of  bacteria  at  genera  level.  This  shows  that  FFPE  and  frozen  results  for  each  individual  correlate.  However,  a  significant  difference  in  beta  diversity  between  FFPE  and  frozen  samples  was  found.    Results  correlated  beTer  between  FFPE  and  frozen  when  targe^ng  V6  compared  to  V4.    Seven  out  of  forty  nega^ve  controls  were  contaminated.  These  are  dis^nguishable  on  this  graph  from  each  other  and  the  faecal  samples.      

It  is  possible  to  successfully  amplify  the  16S  rRNA  gene  from  FFPE  faecal  material.  

Targe)ng  the  shorter  V6  region  of  the  16S  rRNA  gene  gives  closer  results  between  FFPE  and  frozen  samples  than  when    targe)ng  the  V4  region.  

Figure  3.    Alpha  diversity.  Rarefac^on  chart  showing  the  difference  in  within  sample  diversity  between  FFPE  and  frozen  samples  against  sequences  per  sample.    There  is  a  significant  difference  between  V4  FFPE  and  frozen  samples  (p  =  0.05)  but  not  V6.  

Figure  4.  Taxonomy  area  graphs.  Area  graphs  showing  the  rela^ve  abundances  of  bacteria  at  phylum  and  genera  level  according  to  variable  region  of  16S  rRNA  gene  targeted.    The  listed  phyla  varied  in  abundance  significantly  dependent  on  region  targeted  (p  =  <  0.002).  

Figure   1.   Gel   electrophoresis.   Gel   showing  amplifica^on  of   the  V6  region  of   the  16S  rRNA  gene   in   FFPE   and   frozen   faecal   samples.    Reference  ladders  contain  DNA  strands  50  base  pairs   (bp)   apart   in   size.    Nega^ve   and  posi^ve  controls  shown.  Figure  shows  that  it  is  possible  to  successfully  amplify  the  16S  rRNA  gene  from  FFPE  faecal  material.  

Phylum

Genera

Sample source (faecal or negative control)

Samples 1-6 Samples 1-6 Samples 1-6 Samples 1-6

Negative controls :Nc1 (Agar), N7 (95% ethanol) and N14 (tap water).

Negative controls :Nc1 (Agar), N2 (formalin) and N9 (ethanol) and N12 (xylene).

50 bp ladder

50 bp ladder

50 bp ladder

50 bp ladder

Phylum

Genera

Phylum with abundance over 1%

V4 frozen samples 1-6 V4 FFPE samples 1-6 V6 FFPE samples 1-6 V6 Frozen samples 1-6 V6 Negative

controls (4/20

produced

libraries)

V4

Negative

controls

(3/20

produced

libraries)

Taxonomy summary

V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7/V8

Legend

Figure 1. Taxonomy area graphs. Area graphs showing the relative abundances of bacteria at phylum level and genera level. Legend contains all phylum shown to vary significantly based on variable region targeted. Many species in the legend are not

Phylum

Genera

Taxonomy summary

V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7/V8

Legend

Figure 1. Taxonomy area graphs. Area graphs showing the relative abundances of bacteria at phylum level and genera level. Legend contains all phylum shown to vary significantly based on variable region targeted. Many species in the legend are not

Phylum

Genera

Phyla  listed  had  significantly  different  abundance  dependent  on  variable  region  of  16S  rRNA  gene  targeted.  

Figure   5.   Alpha   diversity   of   frozen   samples  according  to  variable  region  targeted.  Graph  shows  significant   differences   between   all   variable   regions  targeted   with   shorter   regions   detec^ng   less  diversity  (p  <  0.001).  

Data  from  frozen  samples  varied  significantly  based  on  the  varible  region  targeted.    Longer  regions  tended  to  detect  a  higher  level  of  alpha  diversity.