Nayana Gautam and Mrinal Kumar Das - arXiv · PhenomenologyofkeVscalesterileneutrinodarkmatterwithS...
Transcript of Nayana Gautam and Mrinal Kumar Das - arXiv · PhenomenologyofkeVscalesterileneutrinodarkmatterwithS...
Phenomenology of keV scale sterile neutrino dark matter with S4
flavor symmetry
Nayana Gautam1, ∗ and Mrinal Kumar Das1, †
1Department of Physics, Tezpur University, Tezpur - 784028, India
AbstractWe study the possibility of simultaneously addressing neutrino phenomenology and the dark
matter in the framework of inverse seesaw. The model is the extension of the standard model by
the addition of two right handed neutrinos and three sterile fermions which leads to a light sterile
state with the mass in the keV range along with three light active neutrino states. The lightest sterile
neutrino can account for a feasible dark matter(DM) candidate. We present a S4 flavor symmetric
model which is further augmented by Z4×Z3 symmetry to constrain the Yukawa Lagrangian. The
structures of the mass matrices involved in inverse seesaw within the S4 framework naturally give
rise to correct neutrino mass matrix with non-zero reactor mixing angle θ13. In this framework,
we conduct a detailed numerical analysis both for normal hierarchy as well as inverted hierarchy
to obtain dark matter mass and DM-active mixing which are the key factors for considering sterile
neutrino as a viable dark matter candidate. We constrain the parameter space of the model from
the latest cosmological bounds on the mass of the dark matter and DM-active mixing.
PACS numbers: 12.60.-i,14.60.Pq,14.60.St
∗Electronic address: [email protected]†Electronic address: [email protected]
1
arX
iv:1
904.
1066
2v3
[he
p-ph
] 1
9 D
ec 2
019
I. INTRODUCTION
The discovery of neutrino oscillations and experimental evidences on neutrino masses and
mixing provide reasons to expect physics beyond standard model. Standard model, being
the most successful scenario in particle physics, can explain the mass of all the particles
except neutrino through the concept of interaction of the particles with Higgs boson. Neu-
trinos remain massless because of the absence of right handed counter part of it in standard
model (SM). The conspicuous discoveries of atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillations by
the Super-Kamioka Neutrino Detection Experiment(Super-Kamiokande)[1]and the Sudbury
Neutrino Observatory (SNO)[2, 3], shortly thereafter confirmed by the Kamioka Liquid Scin-
tillator Antineutrino Detector (KamLAND)[4] experiment provided evidence for the neutrino
flavor oscillation and massive nature of neutrinos. Some pioneer work on neutrino masses
and mixing can be found in [5–10]. In contradiction to the huge achievements in determining
the neutrino oscillation parameters in solar, atmospheric, reactor and accelerator neutrino
experiments[11–15], many important issues related to neutrino physics are yet not solved.
Among these open questions, absolute mass scale of the neutrinos, exact nature of it (Majo-
rana or Dirac), hierarchical pattern of the mass spectrum(Normal or Inverted), leptonic CP
violation are important. The present status of different neutrino parameters can be found in
global fit neutrino oscillation data[16, 17] which is summarised in table III . It is observable
from the data that the leptonic mixing are much larger than the mixing in the quark sector
which creates another puzzle [18]. All these problems appeal for a coherent and successful
framework beyond standard model(BSM).
Although the results of atmospheric, solar and long-baseline experiments are well-fitted
within the framework of three neutrino mixing, there are some current experiments like
LSND [19],MINOS [12] etc which suggest the existence of another fourth massive neu-
trino,usually called as sterile. LSND observed an excess of (νe) in their study of decays
of positively charged muons at rest in the process µ+ −→ e+ + νe + νµ while in MiniBooNE
with a νµ(νµ) beam having neutrino energy of 600(400) MeV, observed an excess of νe(νe)
with a significance of about 4.8 standard deviations [20, 21] . The results informed that
muon anti-neutrinos (νµ) converts into electron anti- neutrinos (νe) over a distance that is
too short for conventional neutrino oscillations to occur. They reported that this oscillation
could be explained by incorporating at least one additional neutrino. Muon anti neutrinos
2
(νµ) could be morphed into a fourth state of neutrino which in turn converted to electron
anti neutrinos(νe). Again, anomalies in SAGE [22] and GALLEX [23] have provided a hint
towards the existence of fourth state of neutrinos. These additional states must relate to
right-handed neutrinos (RHN) for which bare mass terms are allowed by all symmetries i.e.
they should not be present in SU(2)L × U(1)Y interactions, hence are sterile [24]. Sterile
neutrino as its name indicates is stable and it has only gravitational interactions. It has no
charged or neutral current weak interactions except mixing with active neutrinos. Hence, the
subsistence of sterile neutrinos can have observable effects in astrophysical environments and
in cosmology. A natural way to produce sterile neutrinos is by their admixture to the active
neutrino sector [25].The only way to reveal the existence of sterile neutrinos in terrestrial
experiments is through the effects generated by their mixing with the active neutrinos[26].
The simplest way to incorporate mass to the neutrinos is the addition of right handed
(RH) neutrinos to the standard model by hand so that Higgs field can have Yukawa coupling
to the neutrinos also. But to explain the smallness of neutrino mass which is in sub-eV
range, the Yukawa coupling should be fine tuned to a quite unnatural value around 10−12 .
Several theoretical frameworks have been proposed in the last few decades to explain tiny
neutrino mass. Among all scenarios, a significant cornerstone for the theoretical research on
neutrino physics is the formulation of seesaw mechanism, which is classified into different
categories like Type I [27, 28], Type II [29], Type III [30, 31]and Inverse Seesaw(ISS) [32–
34]. In Type I seesaw, the SM is extended by the addition of SM singlet fermions usually
defined as right-handed(RH) neutrinos, that have Yukawa-type interactions with the SM
Higgs and left-handed doublets. The light neutrino mass matrix arising from this type of
seesaw is of the formMν ≈MdM−1RRM
Td , whereMd andMRR are Dirac and Majorana masses
respectively. Besides the SM particle content,the type II seesaw introduces an additional
SU(2)L triplet scalar field. Inverse seesaw requires the existence of extra singlet fermion to
provide rich neutrino phenomenology. In this formalism,the lightest neutrino mass matrix is
given byMν ≈Md(MT )−1µM−1MT
d ,whereMd is the Dirac mass term and µ is the Majorana
mass term for sterile, while M represents the lepton number conserving interaction between
right handed and sterile fermions. Neutrinos with sub-eV scale are obtained from Md at
electroweak scale,M at TeV scale and µ at keV scale. The beyond standard model(BSM)
physics is successful in explaining many unperceived problems in SM as well as some other
cosmological problems like baryon asymmetry of the universe(BAU) and particle nature of
3
dark matter (DM) etc. The baryon asymmetry can be generated naturally through the
decay of the RH neutrinos that exists in seesaw mechanism which is in consistent with the
cosmological observable constrained by Big bang Nucleosynthesis.
Again, another important open question in particle physics as well as cosmology is dark
matter(DM) and its properties. Cosmological and astrophysical measurements in different
context assure that the present Universe is composed of a mysterious,non-baryonic,non-
luminous matter,called dark matter [35, 36]. The evidence comes from the shape of cosmic
microwave background(CMB)power spectrum to cluster and galactic rotation curves and
gravitational lensing etc [37–39]. Inspite of these strong evidences for the presence of dark
matter(DM), the fundamental nature of dark matter i.e its origin, its constituents and
interactions are still unknown. According to the Planck Data , 26.8 % of the energy density
in the universe is composed of DM and the present dark matter abundance is reported as
[40]:
ΩDMh2 = 0.1187± 0.0017
Searching for the possible connection of this exciting cosmological problem with new
physics beyond standard model has been a great challenge to the physics community world-
wide. The important criteria to be fulfilled by a particle to be a good DM candidate can
be found in [41]. These requirements exclude all the SM particles from being DM candi-
date. This has motivated the particle physics community to study different possible BSM
frameworks which can give rise to the correct DM phenomenology and can also be tested at
several different experiments [42]. There are multifarious particles that have been proposed
as a remedy to the DM problem. A popular warm dark matter(WDM) candidate is sterile
neutrino, a right handed neutrino, singlet under the SM gauge symmetry having tiny mixing
with the SM neutrinos leading to a long lifetime [43, 44]. Even in the X-ray band, one of
the most studied candidates of dark matter is sterile neutrino [45, 46], which can radiatively
decay into an active neutrino and a mono energetic photon in the process N −→ ν + γ [47].
The production of sterile neutrino DM can be naturally achieved in the early universe via
a small mixing with active neutrinos [48]. Warm dark matters are composed of particles
having velocity dispersion between that of hot DM(HDM) and cold DM(CDM) particles.
The larger free streaming length of WDM, with respect to CDM, reduces the power at small
scales, suppressing the formation of small structures [49, 50]. In general, there are no theo-
retical limits on the number of sterile neutrinos that can exist, on their masses and mixing
4
with the active neutrinos [26]. Sterile neutrinos specially in keV scale can have a prominent
role in cosmology. Sterile neutrino is a neutral, massive particle and its lifetime can be
very long as explained in [51] . The fact that sterile neutrinos can be produced by their
admixture to the active neutrino sector leads to the conclusion that any reaction producing
active neutrinos can also produce sterile neutrinos as long as active-sterile mixing angles are
non-zero. This could produce enough sterile neutrinos to explain the observed amount of
DM [52]. However, to constitute the observed amount of DM, sterile neutrino in keV range
has some constraints which can be found in [52]. Cosmology predicts the range of viable
dark matter mass as 0.4keV . mDM . 50keV . The lower limit is set by Tremaine-Gunn
bound [53] while a DM candidate loses its stability above 50 keV [54, 55] Considering ad-
ditional observational constraints on the active sterile mixing, the Doodelson-Widrow(DW)
mechanism can account for atmost 50% of the total dark matter density today [56].
Although the origin of neutrino masses as well as leptonic mixing are not directly related
to the fundamental properties of DM, it is highly inspiring to look for a common framework
that can explain both the phenomena. Motivated by this, we have done a phenomenological
study on the light neutrino mass matrix in the framework of inverse seesaw (2,3)(ISS(2,3)) in
which the particle content of SM is extended by two right handed(RH) neutrinos and three
extra sterile fermions. The motivation for studying ISS(2,3) is that it is a possible way to
accommodate DM candidate within itself and also can yield correct neutrino phenomenology.
Moreover, unlike canonical seesaw models, the inverse seesaw can be a low scale framework
where the singlet heavy neutrinos can be at or below the TeV scale without any fine tuning of
Yukawa couplings [42]. The symmetry realization of the model is carried out using discrete
flavor symmetry S4. The model is further augmented by Z4 and Z3 group to avoid the
unnecessary interactions among the particles. We have constructed the matrices involved in
ISS in such a way that the µ − τ symmetry is broken in the resulting light neutrino mass
matrix to comply with the experimental evidence of non-zero reactor mixing angle [57]. We
have studied the DM phenomenology considering the lightest sterile neutrino involved in
ISS mechanism as a potential DM candidate. We have evaluated the model parameters and
then feed these parameters to the calculation of DM mass, DM-active mixing, relic density
and the decay rate of the lightest sterile neutrino. Our model is in agreement with the limits
obtained from cosmology as well as astrophysics.
The paper is organized as follows. In section II, we briefly review the inverse seesaw
5
mechanism and inverse seesaw ISS (2,3) framework. In section III, we present the S4 flavor
symmetric model and the construction of different mass matrices in lepton sector. Section
IV is the discussion of dark mater production in ISS(2,3) framework. In section V, we briefly
mention the constraints on sterile neutrino dark matter. The detailed numerical analysis
and the results are discussed in section VI. Finally, we conclude in section VII.
II. INVERSE SEESAW FRAMEWORK : ISS(2,3)
As discussed in several earlier works, different seesaw mechanisms have eminent role
in generating tiny neutrino masses [27, 29, 30]. The inverse seesaw(ISS) incorporates an
interesting alternative to the conventional seesaw. Though it requires the extension of
Standard Model with extra singlet fermion,it has the advantage of lowering the mass scale
to TeV range,which may be probed at LHC and in future neutrino experiments. It aims at
explaining the smallness of one or more sterile neutrinos by the very same seesaw mechanism
that is behind small active neutrino masses. The particle content in the model extends
minimally that of the Standard Model, by the sequential addition of a pair of SU(2)×U(1)
singlet fermions. In addition to the right-handed neutrinos,characteristic of the standard
seesaw model, the inverse seesaw scheme requires gauge singlet neutrinos si [56]. The relevant
Lagrangian for the ISS is given as,
L = −1
2nTLCMnL + h.c
where C ≡ iγ2γ0 is the charge conjugation matrix and nL = (νL,α, νcR,i, sj)
T .Here,νL,α with
α = e,µ,τ are the SM left handed neutrino states and νcR,i(i = 1, νR) are right handed (RH)
neutrinos,while sj(j = 1, s) are sterile fermions. The neutrino mass matrix arising from the
type of Lagrangian is of the form :
M =
0 Md 0
MdT 0 MN
0 MTN µ
(1)
whereMd ,M and µ are complex matrices. The matrix µ represents the Majorana mass terms
for sterile fermions and the matrix M represents the lepton number conserving interactions
between right handed and new sterile fermions. Standard model neutrinos at sub-eV scale
6
are obtained fromMd at electroweak scale, M at TeV scale and µ at keV scale as explained in
many literatures [34, 58]. The dimension of the mass matrices in the model are(# represents
the number of flavors.)
dimensionMd = (#νL ×#νR)
dimensionM = (#νR ×#s)
dimensionµ = (#s×#s)
Block diagonalisation of the above mass matrix yields the effective light neutrino mass matrix
as:
Mν ≈MTd (MT
N)−1µM−1N Md (2)
Again, the full 8× 8 mass matrix can be diagolaised by using U as,
UTMU = Mdiag = diag(m1,m2....m8) (3)
In general, the inverse seesaw formula for light neutrino mass can generate a very general
structure of neutrino mass matrix. Since the leptonic mixing is found to have some specific
structure with large mixing angles, one can look for possible flavor symmetry origin of it. In
this context, non Abelian discrete flavor symmetries play crucial rule [59]. For the purpose
of the present work, we have used ISS(2,3) framework which is the extension of the SM by
the addition of two RH neutrinos and three additional sterile fermions as mentioned in [43].
The motivation for using this special type of inverse seesaw is that it can account for the
low energy neutrino data and also provides a viable dark matter candidate [56]. In this
framework, Md is a (3 × 2) matrix,M is a (2 × 3) matrix and µ is (3 × 3). The detailed
mechanism for the dark matter production and the generation of light neutrino mass in the
framework of ISS(2,3) will be discussed in the later sections. The mass model is realized
with the help of S4 discrete group. The model is further augmented by Z4 and Z3 group to
protect the unnecessary terms in the Lagrangian.
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL
Symmetries play a crucial role in particle physics. Non-Abelian discrete flavor symmetries
have wide applications in particle physics as these are important tools for controlling the
flavor structures of the model [60, 61]. Discrete symmetries like AN ,SN ,ZN are widely used in
7
Field L lR NR H s φ φ′ φs φl
S4 31 31 2 11 31 32 31 11 11
SU(2)L 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
Z4 1 1 1 +i +i −i −i −1 −i
Z3 ω2 1 1 1 ω ω ω ω ω
TABLE I: Fields and their respective transformations under the symmetry group of the model.
the context of model building in particle physics [62–67]. In the present work, the symmetry
realization of the structure of the mass matrices has been carried out using the discrete flavor
symmetry S4, which is a group of permutation of four objects, isomorphic to the symmetry
group of a cube. S4 has five irreducible representations with two singlets,one doublet and
two triples denoted by 11 , 12, 2, 31 and 32 respectively. The lepton doublet,charged lepton
singlet of the SM and sterile fermion in inverse seesaw model transform as triplet 31 of
S4 while the SM singlet neutrinos NR and SM Higgs doublet transform as 2 and 11 of S4
respectively. The product rules implemented in these representations are given in appendix
A . Further Z4×Z3 symmetry is imposed to get the desired mass matrix and to constrain the
non-desired interactions of the particles. The particle content and the charge assignments
are detailed in table I, where in addition to the lepton sector and to the SM Higgs, flavons
φ, φ′,φs, χ, χ′ have been introduced. The Yukawa Lagrangian for the charged leptons and
also for the neutrinos can be expressed as:
− L = LML + LMD + LM + LMS + h.c (4)
where,
LMD =y
ΛLNRHφ+
y′ΛLNRHφ
′, (5)
Λ is the cut-off scale. It is needed to lower the mass dimension to 4. Here, we need extra
scalar φ and φ′ with SM Higgs because S4 product between a doublet and triplet yields two
triplets and H is a S4 singlet, so we require another triplet scalar so that the total Lagrangian
remains singlet under S4.
LMS = ysssφs (6)
8
Field χ χ′
S4 32 31
SU(2)L 1 1
Z4 −i −i
Z3 ω2 ω2
TABLE II: New flavon fields with their respective transformations under the symmetry group of
the model.
LML is the Lagrangian for the charged leptons which can be written in terms of dimension
five operators as [68]
LML =ylΛLlRHφl (7)
The following flavon alignments allow us to have the desired mass matrix corresponding to
the charged lepton sector
〈Φl〉 = vl.
The charged lepton mass matrix is then given by,
m0l =
vhΛ
ylvl 0 0
0 ylvl 0
0 0 ylvl
, (8)
The Lagrangian LM is given by,
LM = yrNRsχ+ yr′NRsχ′ (9)
The charge assignments that have been chosen for the new flavon fields χ and χ′ are shown
in table II. The VEV alignments for the flavons which result in desired neutrino mass matrix
and leptonic mixing matrix are followed as:
〈Φ〉 = (vh1, vh2,−vh2), 〈φ′〉 = (vh1′ , vh2′ , vh2′), 〈Φs〉 = vs, 〈H〉 = vh, 〈χ〉 = (vr, vr′, 0), 〈χ′〉 = (0, vr′′, 0)
With these flavon alignments different terms in the Lagrangian given by equation (5) can
be written as;
y
ΛNiRLjHΦ =
y
ΛH[N1RL1Φ1 + (
√3
2N2RL2 −
1
2N1RL2)Φ2 + (−
√3
2N2RL3 −
1
2N1RL3)Φ3]
=yvhΛ
[N1RL1vh1 + (
√3
2N2RL2 −
1
2N1RL2)vh2 + (
√3
2N2RL3 +
1
2N1RL3)vh2]
(10)
9
y′ΛNiRLjHΦ′ =
y′ΛH[N2RL1Φ1
′ + (−√
3
2N1RL2 −
1
2N2RL2)Φ2
′ + (
√3
2N1RL3 −
1
2N2RL3)Φ3
′]
=y′vhΛ
[N2RL1vh1′ + (−√
3
2N1RL2 −
1
2N2RL2)vh2′ + (
√3
2N1RL3 −
1
2N2RL3)vh2′ ]
(11)
yrNiRsjχ = yr[N1Rs1Φ1R + (
√3
2N2Rs2 −
1
2N1Rs2)Φ2R + (−
√3
2N2Rs3 −
1
2N1Rs3)Φ3R]
= yr[(N1Rs1)vr + (
√3
2N2Rs2 −
1
2N1Rs2)vr′ ] (12)
yr′NiRsjχ
′ = y′r[N2Rs1Φ1R′ + (−
√3
2N1Rs2 −
1
2N2Rs2)Φ2R
′ + (
√3
2N1Rs3 −
1
2N2Rs3)Φ3R
′]
= yr′[(−√
3
2N1Rs2 −
1
2N2Rs2)vr′′ ] (13)
ysssΦs = ys(s1s1 + s2s2 + s3s3)vs. (14)
The chosen flavon alignments lead to different matrices involved in inverse seesaw formula
as follows,
Md =vhΛ
yvh1 y′vh1′
−12yvh2 −
√3
2y′vh2′
√3
2yvh2 − 1
2y′vh2′
12yvh2 +
√3
2y′vh2′
√3
2yvh2 − 1
2y′vh2′
M =
yrvr −√32yr′vr′′ − 1
2yrvr′ 0
0√
32yrvr′ − 1
2yr′vr′′ 0
µ = ys
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1
vs
Now,we denote a = yΛvhvh1 , b = vh
Λ(−1
2yvh2−
√3
2y′vh2′), c = vh
Λ(√
32yvh2−1
2y′vh2′), e = y′
Λvhvh1′ ,
f = yrvr ,h = −√
32yr′vr′′ − 1
2yrvr′, g =
√3
2yrvr′ − 1
2yr′vr′′ , p = ysvs. With these notations the
mass matrices involved in ISS can be written as,
MD =
a e
b c
−b c
, µ =
p 0 0
0 p 0
0 0 p
, M =
f h 0
0 g 0
. (15)
10
The elements of the light neutrino mass matrix in the framework of ISS(2,3) arising from
the above mentioned mass matrices are given below:
(−mν)11 =(a2g2 − 2aegh+ e2(f 2 + h2))p
f 2g2
(−mν)12 =(−acgh+ bg(ag − eh) + ce(f 2 + h2))p
f 2g2
(−mν)13 =(−acgh+ bg(−ag + eh) + ce(f 2 + h2))p
f 2g2
(−mν)22 =(b2g2 − 2bcgh+ c2(f 2 + h2))p
f 2g2
(−mν)23 =(b2g2 − c2(f 2 + h2))p
f 2g2
(−mν)33 =(b2g2 + 2bcgh+ c2(f 2 + h2))p
f 2g2
Here, we have used S4 product rules in formulating the mass matrices that are discussed
above. The light neutrino mass matrix obtained here in both the models can give rise to
the correct mass squared difference and non-zero θ13. Besides, to avoid some non-desired
interactions among the fields we require Z4 × Z3 symmetry. Thus the desired structures of
the mass matrices have been made possible by the combination of flavor symmetry S4 as
well as Z4 × Z3 symmetry.
IV. DARK MATTER IN THE ISS(2,3) FRAMEWORK
As mentioned in the previous sections, ISS(2,3) is a common framework to address neu-
trino phenomenology as well as the cosmological DM problem. This type of inverse seesaw
bears the specialty that there exists an additional intermediate state with mass ms = O(µ)
in the mass spectrum.
Depending on the number of fields in the model, a generic ISS realization is characterized
by the following mass spectrum [43]
1. Three light active states with masses of the form
mν = O(µ)k2
1 + k2, k =
O(Md)
O(MN)
2. #νR pairs of pseudo-Dirac heavy neutrinos with massesO(M) + O(Md).
3. #s–#νR light sterile states (present only if #s >#νR) with masses O(µ).
11
In order to realize the model phenomenologically, after diagonalizing the matrix associated
to a given ISS realization, must produce three light active eigenstates with mass differences
in agreement with oscillation data and a mixing pattern compatible with the experimental
data. In the scenario of ISS if #s >#νR,there exists a light sterile state with mass O(µ).
This state has unique feature that if the mass of this is in the range of several keV and
with very small mixing with the active neutrinos, it will provide a particle with the lifetime
exceeding the age of the Universe, which can be a WDM candidate [51, 52]. ISS has also the
advantage that it allows for a non zero mixing between the active and the additional sterile
states. [69] . Among different ISS scenario, ISS(2,3) is considered to be the lowest possible
way to accommodate a viable dark matter candidate [43, 56] as it contains unequal number
of NR and s, leading to a DM particle as well as two heavy pseudo-Dirac pairs [70].
Now, the mass matrix in this framework with ‖µ‖ 6 ‖Md‖, ‖MN‖ can be block diago-
nalised into light and heavy sectors as [71]
mν ≈Md(MTN)−1µM−1
N MTd (16)
MH =
0 MN
MTN µ
where mν is the famous ISS formula and MH is the mass matrix for the heavy pseudo-Dirac
pairs and the extra state. mν is diagonalised by PMNS Uν to get the light active neutrinos.
While the diagonalisation of MH will give the mass of the other five heavy particles.
In the framework of ISS(2,3), M is not a squared matrix rather it is a 2 × 3 matrix. So,
M−1 is not well defined. We followed the general version of (16)as proposed by the authors
[69] . It follows as,
mν ≈MddMTd (17)
where d is 2× 2 dimensional submatrix defined as
MH−1 =
d2×2 ....
..... ....
with
MH =
0 MN
MTN µ
It is important to calculate the active-sterile mixing to study the DM phenomenology. In
this context, one can obtain the active-sterile mixing from the first three components of the
12
eigenvectors corresponding to the keV ranged eigenvalue of the mass matrix M in equation
(1). Any stable neutrino state with a non-vanishing mixing to the active neutrinos will
be produced through active-sterile neutrino conversion and the resulting relic abundance is
proportional to the active-sterile mixing and the mass and can be expressed as [72]:
ΩDMh2 = 1.1× 107
∑Cα(ms)|Uαs|2
( ms
keV
)2
, α = e, µ, τ (18)
The derivation of the above formula can be found in appendix B . It can be simplified to
the following expression,
ΩDMh2 u 0.3
(sin22θ
10−10
)( ms
100keV
)2
(19)
where sin22θ = 4∑
α=e,µ,τ |Uαs|2 with |Uαs|is the active-sterile leptonic mixing matrix ele-
ment which will be obtained using equation (3)and ms represents the mass of the lightest
sterile fermion.
The most important criteria for a DM candidate is its stability atleast on cosmological
scale. The lightest sterile neutrino is not totally stable and may decay into an active neutrino
and a photon γ via the process N −→ ν+γ that leads to a monochromatic X-ray line signal.
However,as discussed in many literature [52], the decay rate is negligible with respect to the
cosmological scale because of the small mixing angle. The decay rate is given as [73]:
Γ = 1.38× 10−32
(sin22θ
10−10
)( ms
keV
)5
s−1. (20)
As seen from the above equations, the decay rate and as well as the relic abundance depend
on mixing and mass of the DM candidate. Hence, the same set of model parameters which
are supposed to produce correct neutrino phenomenology can also be used to evaluate the
relic abundance and the decay rate of the sterile neutrino.
V. CONSTRAINTS ON KEV SCALE STERILE NEUTRINO AND EFFECTS OF
HEAVY PSEUDO-DIRAC NEUTRINO STATES
Sterile neutrinos produced by the mixing with active neutrinos can have impacts on sev-
eral phenomena. Cosmology, low energy and collider observables can severely constrain the
model of keV sterile neutrinos as mentioned in [74]. Apart from this, the four pseudo-Dirac
13
states present in the model may have significant effects on phenomena like lepton number vi-
olation, perturbativity of Yukawa couplings,unitarity violation in the active neutrino mixing
matrix [75],which are included in our discussion.
Firstly, the extension of standard model must comply with the latest neutrino oscillation
data for both normal as well as inverted hierarchy. Our model is compatible with that as
we have evaluated the model parameters using the latest global fit neutrino oscillation data
[76] which will be discussed in the next section.
Perturbativity of Yukawa couplings is another important condition to be satisfied by any
model. It puts strong upper bound on the Yukawa couplings. Our model contains three
types of Yukawa couplings y(y′),ys and yr(y′r). The mass range of the flavon fields are so
chosen that it comply with the perturbativity of Yukawa couplings in each case. Thus, in
our analysis to explain neutrino phenomenology and dark matter Yukawa couplings are in
the range (10−5 − 10−2) which satisfies the perturbativity limits. The presence of heavy
pseudo-Dirac states cannot affect the perturbativity limits of Yukawa couplings.
The addition of heavy neutrinos to the standard model may originate processes like
lepton number violating interactions, among which neutrinoless double beta decay(0νββ) is
the most significant one [77]. In our study, we have calculated the contributions of the four
pseudo-Dirac states and also the sterile state to the effective electron neutrino Majorana
mass mee according to [78, 79]. We have used the strong bounds on the effective mass
provided by KamLAND-ZEN [80]
mee < 0.061− 0.165eV (21)
In our analysis, we did not impose any unitarity violation in the active neutrino mixing
matrix (PMNS matrix). In our framework, the effective light neutrino mass matrix mν can
be written as
mν = U∗mνU† (22)
The unitary matrix U is related to the PMNS mixing matrix Uν as follows [69]
Uν = (1− 1
2θθ†)U +O(θ3) ' (1− η)U (23)
Here, θ can be expressed as,
θ = MdM−1N (24)
14
In our analysis, η lies in the range (10−6 − 10−11) which can be ignored in the calculations.
Moreover, as mentioned by the authors in [69], strong experimental constraints allow us to
neglect θ which parametrises the deviation from unitarity of the PMNS matrix.
Direct detection of sterile neutrino provides a strong bounds on mass-mixing parameter
space. There are several experiments for the detection of dark matter [81, 82]. We have
considered the constraints from XENON100,XENON1T which have provided bounds on
active-sterile mixing and our model is consistent with these bounds [82].
A number of cosmological observations put constraints on sum of the three neutrino
masses for both normal and inverted hierarchy [83]. It has been observed that our model is
consistent with the cosmological limits on sum of the active neutrino masses.
Indirect detection is a powerful technique to search for dark matter in which involves in
looking for signatures of DM decaying or annihilating into visible products [84]. Many well
motivated DM candidates could produce the characteristic signature of monochromatic X
ray lines. Sterile neutrinos in keV range can decay into decay into an active neutrino and a
mono- energetic photon(γ). This kind of signature is within reach of satellite detectors like
CHANDRA [85] and XMN [86] providing significant bounds on DM mass and DM-active
couplings. In our analysis, we have imposed the constraints on the mass-mixing parameter
space as mentioned in [73, 87, 88].
The study of the matter power spectrum in the intergalactic medium (IGM) has been
extensively used to constrain the nature of DM [89]. In particular,the new limits on the
nature of DM comes from from the observable of the IGM in the ultraviolet and optical
bands, the so called Lyman forest [90]. The Lyman-α constraint is strongly model dependent
and the bounds are related to the warm dark matter production mechanism,and to which
extent this mechanism contributes to the total DM abundance [56]. Warm dark matter
candidates are subjected to significant constraints from structure formation, which provides
lower bounds on the DM mass [91]. In our model, sterile neutrinos are produced via non
resonant production (NRP) mechanism. The Lyman-α data imposes strong constraint on
the mass of the sterile neutrino. We have adopted the results in [92, 93].
15
VI. NUMERICAL ANALAYSIS AND RESULTS
As discussed before, the structures of the different matrices mD, M, µ involved in ISS are
formed using the discrete flavor symmetry S4 and we obtain resulting light neutrino mass
matrix using (17) . The light neutrino mass matrix arising from the model is consistent with
non-zero θ13 as S4 product rules lead to the light neutrino mass matrix in which the µ− τ
symmetry is explicitly broken. The neutrino mass matrix contains eight complex model
parameters. For the numerical analysis,we have fixed the value of two model parameters.
The remaining six parameters can be evaluated by comparing the neutrino mass matrix
arising from the model with the one which is parametrized by the available 3σ global fit
data given in table III. This parametric form of light neutrino mass matrix is complex
symmetric and so it contains six independent complex elements. Thus we can solve the six
model parameters in terms of the known neutrino parameters using equation (25). We first
randomly generate the nine light neutrino parameters in the 3σ range and then we evaluate
the six model parameters. The light neutrino mass matrix can be written as,
mν = UPMNSmdiagν UT
PMNS (25)
where the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) leptonic mixing matrix can be
parametrized as [94]
UPMNS =
c12c13 s12c13 s13e
−iδ
−s12c23 − c12s23s13eiδ c12c23 − s12s23s13e
iδ s23c13
s12s23 − c12c23s13eiδ −c12s23 − s12c23s13e
iδ c23c13
UMaj (26)
where cij = cos θij, sij = sin θij and δ is the leptonic Dirac CP phase. The diagonal matrix
UMaj = diag(1, eiα, ei(β+δ)) contains the Majorana CP phases α, β. The diagonal mass matrix
of the light neutrinos can be written as, mdiagν = diag(0,
√m2
1 + ∆m2solar,
√m2
1 + ∆m2atm) for
normal hierarchy and mdiagν = diag(
√m2
3 + ∆m2atm,
√∆m2
solar + ∆m2atm,m3) for inverted
hierarchy [95]. For numerical analysis, we have fixed the value of f = 2 × 1010eV and
g = 1012eV and calculated the other model parameters a,b,c,e,h in our model. The fixing of
model parameters is done considering the range given in [69]to get the desired DM mass and
mixing. Author [69] , specified that the first row of the submatrix MN determines the mass
scale of the lightest pseudo-Dirac pair and the second row of the submatrix MN determines
the mass scale of the heavier pseudo-Dirac pair. In our model, parameters f and h give the
16
Oscillation parameters 3σ(NO) 3σ(IO)∆m2
2110−5eV 2 7.05 - 8.14 7.05 - 8.14
∆m231
10−3eV 2 2.41 - 2.60 2.31-2.51
sin2θ12 0.273 - 0.379 0.273 - 0.379
sin2θ23 0.445 - 0.599 0.453 - 0.598
sin2θ13 0.0196 - 0.0241 0.0199 - 0.0244
δπ 0.87 - 1.94 1.12- 1.94
TABLE III: Latest Global fit neutrino oscillation Data [76].
range of the lightest pseudo-Dirac pair and g corresponds to the heavier one. Keeping this
in mind, we have fixed two model parameters from the given range. The eigenvalues of MH
e.g.in case of model are obtained as
MH1 =1
2(p−
√2f 2 + 2g2 + 2h2 − 2
√−4f 2g2 + (−f 2 − g2 − h2)2 + p2 (27)
MH2 =1
2(p+
√2f 2 + 2g2 + 2h2 − 2
√−4f 2g2 + (−f 2 − g2 − h2)2 + p2 (28)
MH3 =1
2(p−
√2f 2 + 2g2 + 2h2 + 2
√−4f 2g2 + (−f 2 − g2 − h2)2 + p2 (29)
MH4 =1
2(p+
√2f 2 + 2g2 + 2h2 + 2
√−4f 2g2 + (−f 2 − g2 − h2)2 + p2 (30)
.
MH5 = p (31)
It is evident that one of the eigenvalues depends only on the mass matrix µ and hence
may be considered as the lightest sterile state as discussed in the previous section. This
eigenvalue corresponds to the mass of the Dark Matter mDM . Thus the model parameter
p will determine the mass of the DM. The DM-active mixing can be determined from (1)
and we plot the mixing as a function of model parameters as well as the DM mass. One
can also obtain the mass of the dark matter from the eigenvalues of the 8 × 8 matrix M
in equation (1). In our model, three eigenvalues correspond to the light active neutrino
masses, four eigenvalues in TeV range give the mass of the pseudo-Dirac particles while one
of the eigenvalues lie in keV range which is considered as DM mass. To get the active-
sterile mixing, first we numerically diagonalise the matrix M in equation (3) using the
evaluated model parameters to obtain U and then we find the first three components of the
17
eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue mDM which represent the three active-sterile
mixing elements.
Using the same set of model parameters,numerically evaluated for the model, we have
also calculated the relic abundance using equation (18) and plot it as a function of the Dark
Matter mass. The decay rates of the sterile DM are obtained using(20) which have been
plotted as a function of the Dark Matter mass as it imposes powerful constraint on DM
mass.
The masses of the heavy neutrinos and their mixing with the active neutrinos are sub-
jected to various experimental constraints like neutrinoless double beta decay (0νββ). The
decay width is proportional to the effective electron neutrino majorana mass (mee) and the
standard contribution is given as,
mee =∣∣∣ 3∑i=1
Uei2mi
∣∣∣ (32)
Addition of extra fermions may contribute to the effective electron neutrino Majorana mass
[96] We have evaluated the contribution to (mee) using the equation in [78, 97]
Mee =∣∣∣ 3∑i=1
Uei2mi
∣∣∣ +∣∣∣ 5∑j=1
Uej2 Mj
k2 +M2j
| < k > |2∣∣∣ (33)
where, Mj and Uej represent the mass of the heavy neutrinos and couplings to the electron
neutrino respectively. | < k > | ' 190 MeV represents neutrino virtuality momentum.
The mixing of the heavy neutrinos to the electron neutrino are obtained from the mixing
matrix U . For this, the four eigenvectors corresponding to four TeV ranged eigenvalues are
evaluated and then the first components of four eigenvectors give the mixing of the heavy
neutrinos to the electron neutrino.
Thus using the same set of model parameters that are used to give correct neutrino
phenomenology, we have calculated the the effective electron neutrino majorana mass in
(0νββ), DM-Active mixing, decay rate of the lightest sterile neutrino and relic abundance
for normal hierarchy(NH) as well as inverted hierarchy(IH).
• We have shown different plots obtained from our numerical analysis carried out for
normal hierarchy as well as inverted hierarchy from fig 1 to fig 17.
• Fig 1 indicates the parameter space for DM mass and DM-active mixing for normal and
inverted hierarchy. To be a good DM candidate, sterile neutrino must have mass in the
18
range (0.4-50)keV and should mix with active neutrinos within the range(10−12−10−8).
From the figure it is clear that both the mass and mixing satisfy the cosmological limit.
We have incorporated the cosmological bounds from Lyman-α and X-ray data in the
figure.
• Fig 2 shows the prediction of decay rate of the lightest sterile neutrino as a function of
DM mass for both the mass hierarchies. It is seen that the decay rate is very negligible
and in the range 10−31 to 10−27 s−1 for both the hierarchies. The decay rate imposes
influential constraint on DM mass and the constraints from structure formation are
imposed in the figure. From fig 1, it is evident that X-ray limits exclude the DM
masses above 17 keV which has also been incorporated in the fig 2
• We have shown the relic abundance of the proposed DM candidate as a function of
DM mass in fig 3 . The relic abundance shown here indicates the partial contribution
of sterile neutrinos to the total DM abundance. Our model can account for almost
66% of the total DM abundance for NH and almost 83% of the total DM abundance
for IH. The limits on the mass of the dark matter from Lyman-α and X-ray data as
obtained from the previous figures are also imposed in fig 3. The allowed region of the
parameter space is spanned from 10 keV to 17 keV.
• Fig 4, 5 and 6 show the two parameter contour plots with DM mass as contour in NH
and Fig 7, 8 and 9 show the two parameter contour plots with DM mass as contour in
IH. In our model, we have six model parameters and one of them corresponds to DM
mass. Hence, we are left with five model parameters and 10 different combinations of
parameters which are shown. It is observed that for both the hierarchies, the model
parameters give rise to DM mass within the cosmological limit. The values of the
model parameters giving rise to the allowed DM mass are given in table IV.
• Fig 10, 11 and 12 show the two parameter contour plots with DM-active mixing as
contour in NH while fig 13, 14 and 15 represent the two parameter contour plots with
DM-active mixing as contour in IH. Here also, we have 10 different combinations of
model parameters. It is observed that for both the hierarchies, the model parameters
give rise to DM-active mixing within the range predicted by cosmology. The allowed
values of the model parameters are shown in table V.
19
FIG. 1: DM-active mixing as a function of the mass of the DM for both normal hierarchy as well
as inverted hierarchy.
• Fig 16 and Fig 17 shows the effects of the heavy states present in the model on
effective mass as a function of mDM . Here, mee represents the standard contribution
while Mee is the contribution from the pseudo-Dirac states as well as the sterile state.
The presence of pseudo-Dirac states along with the sterile state increases the effective
mass parameter upto 1.7 times (1.4 times) larger than the standard contribution for
NH (IH). It is observed that the change is significant below 10 keV of dark matter
mass which range is however excluded by Ly − α data. It is evident from the figures
that the model parameters give rise to effective mass within the experimental limits
provided by KamLAND-ZEN for both the hierarchies.
• Fig 18 indicates the variation of sum of the light neutrino masses as a function of
dark matter mass mDM for NH and IH. It is observed that for both the hierarchies,
our model is consistent with the cosmological limits on the sum of the light neutrino
masses.
VII. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Searching for the particle nature of dark matter is a challenging issue to the physics
community worldwide. Motivated by this, we have conducted our study in the framework
of ISS(2,3) which leads to three light active neutrino states, two pseudo-Dirac states and an
20
FIG. 2: Decay rate of the lightest sterile neutrino as a function of DM mass for normal hierarchy
as well as inverted hierarchy.
FIG. 3: Sterile neutrino contribution to DM abundance in NH and IH
Model Parameter NH(eV) IH(eV)
a 1.5× 107 − 7.5× 107 1× 107 − 8.0× 108
b 1.5× 107 − 7.7× 107 4.0× 107 − 2.5× 108
c 2.0× 109 − 1.0× 1010 2.5× 108 − 1.7× 109
e 2.5× 108 − 3.4× 109 2.5× 109 − 2.7× 1010
h 2.0× 109 − 1.0× 1010 0.5× 1010 − 4.8× 1010
TABLE IV: Allowed range of the model parameters satisfying DM mass.
21
FIG. 4: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with Dark Matter mass as a contour for
normal hierarchy. The mass limit as predicted by cosmology is (0.4− 50)keV.
additional sterile state in keV range which can be considered as a dark matter candidate.
The motivation of the work is to search for a common framework which can simultaneously
address the dark matter problem as well as neutrino phenomenology. We have considered the
model which is the extension of standard model by discrete flavor symmetry S4×Z4×Z3 that
can simultaneously explain the correct neutrino oscillation data and also provides a good
dark matter candidate. The different mass matrices involved in ISS(2,3) are constructed
using S4 product rules which lead to a light neutrino mass matrix mν which is consistent
with the broken µ− τ symmetry.
We have evaluated the model parameters by comparing the light neutrino mass matrix
with the one constructed from light neutrino parameters for both the hierarchical pattern
22
FIG. 5: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with Dark Matter mass as a contour for
normal hierarchy. The mass limit as predicted by cosmology is (0.4− 50)keV.
of neutrino mass spectrum(NH and IH). After finding the model parameters, we then use
the allowed parameters to calculate the mass of the lightest sterile neutrino which is consid-
ered as dark matter candidate and also the DM-active mixing. We obtain two parameter
contour plots taking dark matter mass and DM-active mixing as contours. It is quite inter-
esting that a wide range of model parameters give dark matter mass and DM-active mixing
within the cosmological range for both normal as well as inverted hierarchy. By comparing
different plots for different combinations of the model parameters, we have found a com-
mon allowed parameter space considering the requirement of satisfying the correct DM mass
and mixing within the model framework. Considering the lightest sterile neutrino as dark
matter candidate, we have calculated the relic abundance which accounts for almost ∼ 83
% of the total DM abundance. We have also verified the stability of the dark matter by
23
FIG. 6: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with Dark Matter mass as a contour for
normal hierarchy. The mass limit as predicted by cosmology is (0.4− 50)keV.
Model Parameter NH(eV) IH(eV)
a 0.1× 107 − 5.0× 107 0.1× 107 − 3.0× 108
b 0.1× 107 − 5.0× 107 1.0× 107 − 1.5× 108
c 0.1× 109 − 8.0× 109 1.0× 108 − 1.9× 109
e 0.1× 108 − 2.0× 109 1.0× 109 − 1.7× 1010
h 0.1× 109 − 9.5× 109 2.0× 109 − 3.0× 1010
TABLE V: Allowed range of the model parameters satisfying DM-active mixing.
calculating the decay rate of the lightest sterile neutrino in the process N −→ ν + γ (N
being the sterile neutrino) with same range of allowed parameters. We have obtained a
negligible decay rate which ensures the stability of the dark matter candidate at least in
the cosmological scales. We have also verified the viability of the model from different phe-
nomena like constraints from direct searches of sterile neutrinos, deviation from unitarity
of the PMNS mixing matrix, perturbativity of the Yukawa couplings, neutrinoless double
beta decay. Thus we present a model which offers a well-motivated DM candidate as well
as correct neutrino phenomenology. The detailed numerical analysis assures sufficient pa-
rameter space satisfying the criteria of a feasible dark matter candidate and a better reach
for neutrino sector as well. A wide range of parameter space allowed from the dark matter
24
FIG. 7: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with Dark Matter mass as a contour for
inverted hierarchy The mass limit as predicted by cosmology is (0.4− 50)keV.
consideration, has the possibility to be probed at LHC in near future. The keV scale sterile
neutrino can play a vital role in successfully achieving low scale leptogenesis, which we leave
for our future study.
Appendix A: Properties of S4 group
S4 is the group of permutations of four objects with 24 group elements. S and T are the
two generators [98] of S4 satisfying
T 4 = S3 = e, TS2T = S (A1)
25
FIG. 8: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with Dark Matter mass as a contour for
inverted hierarchy The mass limit as predicted by cosmology is (0.4− 50)keV.
All of the S4 elements can be written as products of these two generators. There are five
inequivalent irreducible representations of S4, two singlets 1 and 1′, one doublet 2 and
two triplets 3 and 3′. S and T have different structures depending on which irreducible
representation we are considering singlet, doublet or triplet. The representations are given
as follows
a, b ∼ 11,
a1
a2
,
b1
b2
∼ 2,
a1
a2
a3
,
b1
b2
b3
∼ 3,
a′1
a′2
a′3
,
b′1
b′2
b′3
∼ 3′.
The tensor products of S4 that has been used in the present analysis are given below (for
26
FIG. 9: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with Dark Matter mass as a contour for
inverted hierarchy The mass limit as predicted by cosmology is (0.4− 50)keV.
more details see [98])
3× 1 = 3, 3× 1′ = 3′, 3′ × 1′ = 3, 2× 1′ = 2.
(A)3 × (B)3 = (A ·B)1 +
A · Σ ·B
A · Σ∗ ·B
2
+
AyBz
AzBx
AxBy
3
+
[AyBz]
[AzBx]
[AxBy]
3′
. (A2)
A ·B = AxBx + AyBy + AzBz
AiBj = AiBj +BjAi
[AiBj] = AiBj − AjBj
A · Σ ·B = AxBx + ωAyBy + ω2AzBz
A · Σ∗ ·B = AxBx + ω2AyBy + ωAzBz.
(A3)
Later on for simplicity, we can replace 3→ 31, 3′ → 32, 1→ 11, 1′ → 12.
2⊗ 31 = 31 ⊕ 32,
31 ⊗ 31 = 11 ⊕ 2⊕ 31 ⊕ 32,
32 ⊗ 32 = 11 ⊕ 2⊕ 31 ⊕ 32.
27
FIG. 10: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with the DM-active mixing as the contour
for normal hierarchy. The limit as predicted by cosmology is (10−12 − 10−8)
The Clebsch-Gordon coefficients for 2⊗ 31, used in our analysis is as follows
a1
a2
2
⊗
b1
b2
b3
31
=
a2b1
−12(√
3a1b2 + a2b2)
12(√
3a1b3 − a2b3)
31
⊕
a1b1
12(√
3a2b2 − a1b2)
−12(√
3a2b3 + a1b3)
32
.
Similarly,the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients for 31 ⊗ 31, used in our analysis can be expressed
28
FIG. 11: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with the DM-active mixing as the contour
for normal hierarchy. The limit as predicted by cosmology is (10−12 − 10−8)
as, a1
a2
a3
31
⊗
b1
b2
b3
31
= (a1b1 + a2b2 + a3b3)11 ⊕
1/√
2(a2b2 − a3b3)
1/√
6(−2a1b1 + a2b2 + a3b3)
2
⊕
a2b3 + a3b2
a1b3 + a3b1
a1b2 + a2b1
31
⊕
a3b2 − a2b3
a1b3 − a3b1
a2b1 − a1b2
32
.
29
FIG. 12: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with the DM-active mixing as the contour
for normal hierarchy. The limit as predicted by cosmology is (10−12 − 10−8)
The Clebsch-Gordon coefficients for 32 ⊗ 32, used in our analysis is given as,a1
a2
a3
32
⊗
b1
b2
b3
32
= (a1b1 + a2b2 + a3b3)11 ⊕
1/√
2(a2b2 − a3b3)
1/√
6(−2a1b1 + a2b2 + a3b3)
2
⊕
a2b3 + a3b2
a1b3 + a3b1
a1b2 + a2b1
31
⊕
a3b2 − a2b3
a1b3 − a3b1
a2b1 − a1b2
32
.
Appendix B: Derivation of Boltzmann Equation in FRW Universe:Expression for
relic density
Boltzmann equation is integral partial differential equation for the phase space distribu-
tion of all the species present in the Universe. The evolution of phase space distribution
function of the particles is governed by Boltzmann equation and solution of this equation
gives the relic density of the species. Solution of Boltzmann equation is important to find
the relic abundance of the dark matter candidate. The number density is governed by[99]
dnadt
+ 3Hna = Ca (B1)
30
FIG. 13: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with the DM-active mixing as the contour
for inverted hierarchy. The limit as predicted by cosmology is (10−12 − 10−8)
where Ca is the collision operator representing all interactions present among the particles
and H is the Hubble parameter. We consider 2 −→ 2 process in which Ca can be written
as[100]
Cab−→cd = −∫
(2π)4δ4(pa+pb−pc−pd)dπadπbdπcdπd[|Mab−→cd|2fafb−|Mcd−→ab|2fcfd (B2)
where dπi represents the phase space and the expression for dπi obtained as follows,
dπi = gid3π
2E × (2π)3(B3)
and,
fi =ni(t)
neqi (t)f eqi (E, t) (B4)
31
FIG. 14: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with the DM-active mixing as the contour
for inverted hierarchy. The limit as predicted by cosmology is (10−12 − 10−8)
Here,we consider CP or T invariance so that
|Mab−→cd|2 = |Mcd−→ab|2 = |M |2
and equation (B2) can be read as,
Cab−→cd = −∫
(2π)4δ4(pa + pb − pc − pd)dπadπbdπcdπd[|M |2(fafb − fcfd)] (B5)
(fafb − fcfd) is the collision term in the Boltzmann equation.
fi = exp[−Ei − µT
] (B6)
We assume chemical potential to be zero (µ = 0) which gives (fafb− fcfd) = [fafb− f eqa feqb ]
32
FIG. 15: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with the DM-active mixing as the contour
for inverted hierarchy. The limit as predicted by cosmology is (10−12 − 10−8)
FIG. 16: Preictoions of effective mass as a function of mDM for normal hierarchy. The standard
contribution is shown in blue color and nonstandard contributions with pseudo-Dirac neutrinos and
sterile state are shown in red color. Comparison of these two contributions are shown in the figure
on the right side.
as energy part of the delta function enforcesEa + Eb = Ec − Ed, using equation(B4)we get,
Cab−→cd = −∫
1
naeqnbeq(2π)4δ4(pa+pb−pc−pd)dπadπbdπcdπd|M |2exp[−
EaT
]exp[−EbT
][nanb−neqa neqb ]
(B7)
33
FIG. 17: Effective mass as a function of mDM for inverted hierarchy.The standard contribution is
shown in blue color and nonstandard contributions with pseudo-Dirac neutrinos and sterile state
are shown in red color. Comparison of these two contributions are shown in the figure on the right
side.
FIG. 18: Sum of light neutrino masses as a function of mass of DM for both normal hierarchy as
well as inverted hierarchy.
Again considering na = nb we can write,
Cab−→cd = −∫
1
(naeq)2(2π)4δ4(pa+pb−pc−pd)dπadπbdπcdπd|M |2exp[−
EaT
]exp[−EbT
][n2a−(neqa )2]
(B8)
Cab−→cd = < σ|v >rel[n2a − (neqa )2] (B9)
34
where,the thermally averaged annihilation cross-section is given as,
< σ|v > = −∫
1
(naeq)2(2π)4δ4(pa + pb − pc − pd)dπadπbdπcdπd|M |2exp[−
EaT
]exp[−EbT
]
Thus the relic abundance of a any particle χ is governed by the Boltzmann equation as
followsdnχdt
+ 3Hnχ = < σ|v >rel[n2χ − (neqχ )2] (B10)
To solve it, we replace the variable number density n by Y = nS, S being the entropy of the
Universe and
t = 0.301g−2mpl
m2x2
. Now we havedY
dx= −x < σ|v > S
H(m)(Y 2 − Yeq2) (B11)
The relic abundance of a given elementary particle is a measure of the present quantity of
that particle remaining from the Big Bang. It can be expressed as[101],
Ωχh2 =
ρ0
ρcrit=S0Y∞m
ρcrit(B12)
where S0 presents entropy andY∞ = Y (x = ∞) is the present value. ρcrit can be obtained
from 8ΠGρcrit = 3H02, H0 is the Hubble constant. Thus ,solving the equation (B11) for
Y (x = ∞), one can get the expression for relic abundance of a species. In case of sterile
neutrinos, the relic abundance can be expressed as[72]:
Ωαs =msYαs
3.65× 10−9h2GeV(B13)
Here,ms represents the mass of the sterile neutrino and Yαs is the neutrino Yukawa couplings.
Using the parametrisation |εαs| ≈ θαs[56],we get,
Ωαsh2 = 0.273× 109msYαs|εαs|2
θ2αs
GeV −1
= 0.11× 2.49× 10−5msYαsθ2αs
(|εαs|
0.1eV)2
= 1.1× 107Cα(ms)|εαs|(ms
keV)2 (B14)
where,
Cα(ms) = 2.49× 10−5Yαsθ2αs
keV
ms
(B15)
35
Acknowledgements
NG acknowledges Department of Science and Technology (DST),India(grant
DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2016/IF160994) for the financial assistantship. The work
of MKD is supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India
under the project no. EMR/2017/001436.
[1] Fukuda, S., Fukuda, Y., Ishitsuka, M., Itow, Y., Kajita, T. et al. Constraints on neutrino os-
cillations using 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande solar neutrino data. Physical Review Letters,
86(25):5656, 2001
[2] Ahmad, Q. R., Allen, R., Andersen, T., Anglin, J., Barton, J. et al. Direct evidence for
neutrino flavor transformation from neutral-current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino
Observatory. Physical review letters, 89(1):011301, 2002
[3] Ahmad, Q., Allen, R., Andersen, T., Anglin, J., Barton, J. et al. Measurement of day
and night neutrino energy spectra at SNO and constraints on neutrino mixing parameters.
Physical Review Letters, 89(1):011302, 2002
[4] Abe, S., Ebihara, T., Enomoto, S., Furuno, K., Gando, Y. et al. Precision measurement of
neutrino oscillation parameters with KamLAND. Physical Review Letters, 100(22):221803,
2008
[5] King, S. F., Merle, A., Morisi, S., Shimizu, Y., and Tanimoto, M. Neutrino mass and mixing:
from theory to experiment. New Journal of Physics, 16(4):045018, 2014
[6] Ma, E. Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses. Physical Review Letters, 81(6):1171,
1998
[7] Mohapatra, R., Antusch, S., Babu, K., Barenboim, G., Chen, M.-C. et al. Theory of neutrinos:
a white paper. Reports on Progress in Physics, 70(11):1757, 2007
[8] King, S. F. Neutrino mass models. Reports on Progress in Physics, 67(2):107, 2003
[9] Mohapatra, R. N. and Valle, J. W. Neutrino mass and baryon-number nonconservation in
superstring models. Physical Review D, 34(5):1642, 1986
[10] Schechter, J. and Valle, J. W. Neutrino decay and spontaneous violation of lepton number.
Physical Review D, 25(3):774, 1982
36
[11] Abe, Y., Aberle, C., Dos Anjos, J., Barriere, J., Bergevin, M. et al. Reactor ν¯ e disappearance
in the Double Chooz experiment. Physical Review D, 86(5):052008, 2012
[12] Adamson, P., Anghel, I., Backhouse, C., Barr, G., Bishai, M. et al. Electron neutrino and an-
tineutrino appearance in the full MINOS data sample. Physical review letters, 110(17):171801,
2013
[13] An, F., Bai, J., Balantekin, A., Band, H., Beavis, D. et al. Observation of electron-
antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay. Physical Review Letters, 108(17):171803, 2012
[14] Abe, K., Abgrall, N., Ajima, Y., Aihara, H., Albert, J. et al. Indication of electron neutrino
appearance from an accelerator-produced off-axis muon neutrino beam. Physical Review
Letters, 107(4):041801, 2011
[15] An, F., Bai, J., Balantekin, A., Band, H., Beavis, D. et al. Observation of electron-
antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay. Physical Review Letters, 108(17):171803, 2012
[16] Gonzalez-Garcia, M., Maltoni, M., and Schwetz, T. Global analyses of neutrino oscillation
experiments. Nuclear Physics B, 908:199–217, 2016
[17] Capozzi, F., Lisi, E., Marrone, A., Montanino, D., and Palazzo, A. Neutrino masses and
mixings: Status of known and unknown 3ν parameters. Nuclear Physics B, 908:218–234,
2016
[18] Hagedorn, C., Lindner, M., and Mohapatra, R. N. S4 flavor symmetry and fermion masses:
towards a grand unified theory of flavor. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2006(06):042, 2006
[19] Athanassopoulos, C. C. Athanassopoulos et al.(LSND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 81,
1774 (1998). Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:1774, 1998
[20] Aguilar-Arevalo, A., Bazarko, A., Brice, S., Brown, B., Bugel, L. et al. Search for Electron
Neutrino Appearance at the ∆ m 2 1 eV 2 Scale. Physical review letters, 98(23):231801, 2007
[21] Aguilar-Arevalo, A., Brown, B., Bugel, L., Cheng, G., Conrad, J. et al. Significant excess
of electronlike events in the MiniBooNE short-baseline neutrino experiment. Physical review
letters, 121(22):221801, 2018
[22] Abdurashitov, J., Gavrin, V., Girin, S., Gorbachev, V., Ibragimova, T. et al. Measurement of
the response of a gallium metal solar neutrino experiment to neutrinos from a 51 Cr source.
Physical Review C, 59(4):2246, 1999
[23] Naumov, D. V. Sterile Neutrino. A short introduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.00151,
2019
37
[24] Das, P., Mukherjee, A., and Das, M. K. Active and sterile neutrino phenomenology with A4
based minimal extended seesaw. Nuclear Physics B, 2019
[25] Dodelson, S. and Widrow, L. M. Sterile neutrinos as dark matter. Physical Review Letters,
72(1):17, 1994
[26] Hamann, J., Hannestad, S., Raffelt, G. G., and Wong, Y. Y. Sterile neutrinos with eV masses
in cosmologyâĂŤhow disfavoured exactly? Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics,
2011(09):034, 2011
[27] Mohapatra, R. N. and Senjanović, G. Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with
spontaneous parity violation. Physical Review D, 23(1):165, 1981
[28] Gell-Mann, M., Ramond, P., and Slansky, R. PRINT-80-0576-CERN; RN Mohapatra and G.
Senjanovic. Phys. Rev. Lett, 44:912, 1980
[29] Arhrib, A., Bajc, B., Ghosh, D. K., Han, T., Huang, G.-Y. et al. Collider signatures for the
heavy lepton triplet in the type I+ III seesaw mechanism. Physical Review D, 82(5):053004,
2010
[30] Ma, E. and Roy, D. Heavy triplet leptons and new gauge boson. Nuclear Physics B, 644(1-
2):290–302, 2002
[31] Foot, R., Lew, H., He, X.-G., and Joshi, G. C. See-saw neutrino masses induced by a triplet
of leptons. Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 44(3):441–444, 1989
[32] Mohapatra, R. N. Mechanism for understanding small neutrino mass in superstring theories.
Physical review letters, 56(6):561, 1986
[33] González-Garciá, M. C. and Valle, J. W. Fast decaying neutrinos and observable flavour
violation in a new class of majoron models. Physics Letters B, 216(3-4):360–366, 1989
[34] Deppisch, F. and Valle, J. Enhanced lepton flavor violation in the supersymmetric inverse
seesaw model. Physical Review D, 72(3):036001, 2005
[35] Barnett, R. M., Carone, C., Groom, D., Trippe, T., Wohl, C. et al. Review of particle physics.
Physical Review D, 54(1):1, 1996
[36] Battaglieri, M., Belloni, A., Chou, A., Cushman, P., Echenard, B. et al. US cosmic visions:
new ideas in dark matter 2017: community report. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.04591, 2017
[37] Rubin, V. C. and Ford Jr, W. K. Rotation of the Andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic
survey of emission regions. The Astrophysical Journal, 159:379, 1970
[38] Cai, R.-G., Liu, T.-B., and Wang, S.-J. Reheating sensitivity on primordial black holes. arXiv
38
preprint arXiv:1806.05390, 2018
[39] Clowe, D., Bradač, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Markevitch, M., Randall, S. W. et al. A direct em-
pirical proof of the existence of dark matter. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 648(2):L109,
2006
[40] Ade, P. PAR Ade et al.(Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016). Astron.
Astrophys., 594:A13, 2016
[41] Taoso, M., Bertone, G., and Masiero, A. Dark matter candidates: a ten-point test. Journal
of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2008(03):022, 2008
[42] Mukherjee, A., Borah, D., and Das, M. K. Common origin of nonzero θ 13 and dark mat-
ter in an S 4 flavor symmetric model with inverse seesaw mechanism. Physical Review D,
96(1):015014, 2017
[43] Abada, A. and Lucente, M. Looking for the minimal inverse seesaw realisation. Nuclear
Physics B, 885:651–678, 2014
[44] Borah, D. and Dasgupta, A. Common origin of neutrino mass, dark matter and Dirac lepto-
genesis. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2016(12):034, 2016
[45] Kusenko, A. Sterile neutrinos: the dark side of the light fermions. Physics Reports, 481(1-
2):1–28, 2009
[46] Abazajian, K. N. Sterile neutrinos in cosmology. Physics Reports, 711:1–28, 2017
[47] Pal, P. B. and Wolfenstein, L. Radiative decays of massive neutrinos. Physical Review D,
25(3):766, 1982
[48] Dodelson, S. and Widrow, L. M. Sterile neutrinos as dark matter. Physical Review Letters,
72(1):17, 1994
[49] Bode, P., Ostriker, J. P., and Turok, N. Halo formation in warm dark matter models. The
Astrophysical Journal, 556(1):93, 2001
[50] Sommer-Larsen, J. and Dolgov, A. Formation of disk galaxies: warm dark matter and the
angular momentum problem. The Astrophysical Journal, 551(2):608, 2001
[51] Merle, A. keV sterile neutrino Dark Matter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08430, 2017
[52] Adhikari, R., Agostini, M., Ky, N. A., Araki, T., Archidiacono, M. et al. A white paper on keV
sterile neutrino dark matter. Journal of cosmology and astroparticle physics, 2017(01):025,
2017
[53] Tremaine, S. and Gunn, J. E. Dynamical role of light neutral leptons in cosmology. Physical
39
Review Letters, 42(6):407, 1979
[54] Boyarsky, A., Ruchayskiy, O., and Shaposhnikov, M. The role of sterile neutrinos in cosmology
and astrophysics. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 59:191–214, 2009
[55] Merle, A. Constraining models for keV sterile neutrinos by quasidegenerate active neutrinos.
Physical Review D, 86(12):121701, 2012
[56] Abada, A., Arcadi, G., and Lucente, M. Dark Matter in the minimal Inverse Seesaw mecha-
nism. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2014(10):001, 2014
[57] An, F., Bai, J., Balantekin, A., Band, H., Beavis, D. et al. Observation of electron-
antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay. Physical Review Letters, 108(17):171803, 2012
[58] Dev, P. B. and Mohapatra, R. TeV scale inverse seesaw model in S O (10) and leptonic
nonunitarity effects. Physical Review D, 81(1):013001, 2010
[59] G Altarelli, F. F. Discrete flavor symmetries and models of neutrino mixing. Reviews of
modern physics - APS, 2010
[60] Altarelli, G. and Feruglio, F. Discrete flavor symmetries and models of neutrino mixing.
Reviews of modern physics, 82(3):2701, 2010
[61] Ishimori, H., Kobayashi, T., Ohki, H., Shimizu, Y., Okada, H. et al. Non-Abelian discrete
symmetries in particle physics. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 183:1–163, 2010
[62] Ma, E. A_4 Origin of the Neutrino Mass Matrix. Phys. Rev. D, 70(hep-ph/0404199):031901,
2004
[63] Kalita, R. and Borah, D. Constraining Type I Seesaw with A_4 Flavor Symmetry From
Neutrino Data and Leptogenesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.05466, 2015
[64] Zee, A. Obtaining the neutrino mixing matrix with the tetrahedral group. Physics Letters
B, 630(1-2):58–67, 2005
[65] King, S. F. and Luhn, C. Neutrino mass and mixing with discrete symmetry. Reports on
Progress in Physics, 76(5):056201, 2013
[66] Mukherjee, A. and Das, M. K. Neutrino phenomenology and scalar Dark Matter with A4
flavor symmetry in Inverse and type II seesaw. Nuclear Physics B, 913:643–663, 2016
[67] Borgohain, H. and Das, M. K. Phenomenology of two texture zero neutrino mass in left-right
symmetric model with Z 8× Z 2. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(2):129, 2019
[68] L Dorame, E. P. J. V., S Morisi. New neutrino mass sum rule from the inverse seesaw
mechanism. Physical Review D, 2012
40
[69] Abada, A., Arcadi, G., Domcke, V., and Lucente, M. Neutrino masses, leptogenesis and dark
matter from small lepton number violation? Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics,
2017(12):024, 2017
[70] Lucente, M. Implication of Sterile Fermions in Particle Physics and Cosmology. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1609.07081, 2016
[71] Awasthi, R. L., Parida, M., and Patra, S. Neutrinoless double beta decay and pseudo-Dirac
neutrino mass predictions through inverse seesaw mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.4784,
2013
[72] Asaka, T., Shaposhnikov, M., and Laine, M. Lightest sterile neutrino abundance within the
νMSM. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2007(01):091, 2007
[73] Ng, K. C., Roach, B. M., Perez, K., Beacom, J. F., Horiuchi, S. et al. New Con-
straints on Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from NuSTAR M31 Observations. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1901.01262, 2019
[74] Abada, A., De Romeri, V., and Teixeira, A. Impact of sterile neutrinos on nuclear-assisted
cLFV processes. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(2):83, 2016
[75] Chrzaszcz, M., Drewes, M., Gonzalo, T. E., Harz, J., Krishnamurthy, S. et al. A frequentist
analysis of three right-handed neutrinos with GAMBIT. 2019
[76] de Salas, P., Forero, D., Ternes, C., Tortola, M., and Valle, J. Status of neutrino oscillations
2018: 3σ hint for normal mass ordering and improved CP sensitivity. Physics Letters B,
782:633–640, 2018
[77] Beneš, P., Faessler, A., Kovalenko, S., and Šimkovic, F. Sterile neutrinos in neutrinoless
double beta decay. Physical Review D, 71(7):077901, 2005
[78] Abada, A., Hernandez-Cabezudo, A., and Marcano, X. Beta and neutrinoless double beta
decays with KeV sterile fermions. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(1):41, 2019
[79] Blennow, M., Fernandez-Martinez, E., Lopez-Pavon, J., and Menéndez, J. Neutrinoless dou-
ble beta decay in seesaw models. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2010(7):96, 2010
[80] Gando, A., Gando, Y., Hachiya, T., Hayashi, A., Hayashida, S. et al. Search for Majorana
neutrinos near the inverted mass hierarchy region with KamLAND-Zen. Physical review
letters, 117(8):082503, 2016
[81] Aprile, E., Aalbers, J., Agostini, F., Alfonsi, M., Amaro, F. et al. Intrinsic backgrounds from
Rn and Kr in the XENON100 experiment. The European Physical Journal C, 78(2):132, 2018
41
[82] Campos, M. D. and Rodejohann, W. Testing keV sterile neutrino dark matter in future direct
detection experiments. Physical Review D, 94(9):095010, 2016
[83] Aghanim, N. et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. 2018
[84] Boyarsky, A., Neronov, A., Ruchayskiy, O., Shaposhnikov, M., and Tkachev, I. Strategy for
searching for a dark matter sterile neutrino. Physical review letters, 97(26):261302, 2006
[85] Horiuchi, S., Humphrey, P. J., Onorbe, J., Abazajian, K. N., Kaplinghat, M. et al. Sterile neu-
trino dark matter bounds from galaxies of the Local Group. Physical Review D, 89(2):025017,
2014
[86] Boyarsky, A., Iakubovskyi, D., Ruchayskiy, O., and Savchenko, V. Constraints on decay-
ing dark matter from XMM–Newton observations of M31. Monthly Notices of the Royal
Astronomical Society, 387(4):1361–1373, 2008
[87] Abazajian, K. N., Acero, M., Agarwalla, S., Aguilar-Arevalo, A., Albright, C. et al. Light
sterile neutrinos: a white paper. arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.5379, 2012
[88] Perez, K., Ng, K. C., Beacom, J. F., Hersh, C., Horiuchi, S. et al. Almost closing the ν MSM
sterile neutrino dark matter window with NuSTAR. Physical Review D, 95(12):123002, 2017
[89] Adhikari, R., Agostini, M., Ky, N. A., Araki, T., Archidiacono, M. et al. A white paper on keV
sterile neutrino dark matter. Journal of cosmology and astroparticle physics, 2017(01):025,
2017
[90] Meiksin, A. A. Publisher’s Note: The physics of the intergalactic medium [Rev. Mod. Phys.
81, 1405 (2009)]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(4):1943, 2009
[91] Boyarsky, A., Lesgourgues, J., Ruchayskiy, O., and Viel, M. Realistic sterile neutrino dark
matter with keV mass does not contradict cosmological bounds. Physical review letters,
102(20):201304, 2009
[92] Baur, J., Palanque-Delabrouille, N., Yeche, C., Boyarsky, A., Ruchayskiy, O. et al. Constraints
from Ly-α forests on non-thermal dark matter including resonantly-produced sterile neutrinos.
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2017(12):013, 2017
[93] Boyarsky, A., Lesgourgues, J., Ruchayskiy, O., and Viel, M. Lyman-α constraints on warm
and on warm-plus-cold dark matter models. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics,
2009(05):012, 2009
[94] Giganti, C., Lavignac, S., and Zito, M. Neutrino oscillations: the rise of the PMNS paradigm.
Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 2017
42
[95] Nath, N., Ghosh, M., Goswami, S., and Gupta, S. Phenomenological study of extended
seesaw model for light sterile neutrino. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017(3), 2017. ISSN
1029-8479
[96] Abada, A., De Romeri, V., Lucente, M., Teixeira, A. M., and Toma, T. Effective Majorana
mass matrix from tau and pseudoscalar meson lepton number violating decays. JHEP, 02:169,
2018
[97] Awasthi, R. L., Parida, M. K., and Patra, S. Neutrinoless double beta decay and pseudo-Dirac
neutrino mass predictions through inverse seesaw mechanism. 2013
[98] Ishimori, H., Kobayashi, T., Ohki, H., Okada, H., Shimizu, Y. et al. An introduction to
non-Abelian discrete symmetries for particle physicists, volume 858. Springer, 2012
[99] Steigman, G., Dasgupta, B., and Beacom, J. F. Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact
on searches for dark matter annihilation. Physical Review D, 86(2):023506, 2012
[100] DâĂŹEramo, F. and Thaler, J. Semi-annihilation of dark matter. Journal of High Energy
Physics, 2010(6):109, 2010
[101] Kolb, E. The early universe. CRC Press, 2018
43