Natural Resources & Environment · Natural Resources & Environment Natural Resources & Environment...
Transcript of Natural Resources & Environment · Natural Resources & Environment Natural Resources & Environment...
Natural Resources & Environment
Natural Resources & Environment
V(A). Planned Program (Summary)
Natural Resources & Environment
1. Name of the Planned Program
KA
Code
%1862
ExtensionKnowledge Area
%1890
Extension
%1862
Research
%1890
Research
102 Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships 4%112 Watershed Protection and Management 6%123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources 18%132 Weather and Climate 1%133 Pollution Prevention and Mitigation 1%135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife 20%136 Conservation of Biological Diversity 26%201 Plant Genome, Genetics, and Genetic Mechanisms 1%213 Weeds Affecting Plants 1%304 Animal Genome 1%313 Internal Parasites in Animals 1%314 Toxic Chemicals, Poisonous Plants, Naturally
Occurring Toxins, and Other Hazards Affecting
Animals
4%
315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection 1%403 Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Reuse 2%602 Business Management, Finance, and Taxation 1%605 Natural Resource and Environmental Economics 5%608 Community Resource Planning and Development 3%609 Economic Theory and Methods 2%610 Domestic Policy Analysis 1%803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting
Individuals, Families and Communities1%
Total 100%
V(B). Program Knowledge Area(s)
1. Program Knowledge Areas and Percentage
1. Actual amount of professional FTE/SYs expended this Program
V(C). Planned Program (Inputs)
Plan
1890 18901862 1862
Extension ResearchYear:
0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0
Actual 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0
2007
Page 1 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
045528700
084137800
1862 All Other 1890 All Other 1862 All Other 1890 All Other
084137800
1862 Matching 1890 Matching 1862 Matching 1890 Matching
Extension Research
Smith-Lever 3b & 3c 1890 Extension Hatch Evans-Allen
2. Actual dollars expended in this Program (includes Carryover Funds from previous years)
1. Brief description of the Activity
V(D). Planned Program (Activity)
In 2007, the NH-AES had nineteen projects investigating diverse issues in Natural Resources and the Environment. They
ranged from biodiversity assessments, to the development of species identification keys, to remote sensing methodology for
forest composition, to the detection of environmental hazards to human health, to assessments of the impact of invasive
species. Project 1 assessed the increased accuracy of using higher resolution images to create vegetation maps of New
England forests. The primary activities associated with Project 2 included field data collection, data analysis, model building to
measure, manage and project forest structure in New Hampshire. In Project 3, a field survey of floristic diversity was completed
in forests of islands in Lake Winnipesaukee, NH. Project 4 completed field studies to assess the impact of glossy buckthorn, an
invasive shrub that is has spread through New Englandforests. Land management strategies and recommendations were
developed. As part of a systematic evaluation of land use on water quality in southern New Hampshire, Project 5 used field
studies in early success ional habitats to determine site characteristics that affect vulnerability to invasion by alien shrubs.
Project 6 completed field and laboratory studies to assess the environmental impacts of agriculture in a fragmented landscape.
Project 7 completed field and herbarium studies to assess biodiversity of aquatic plants in the northeastern US. Project 8
sampled the insect fauna of 46 streams and rivers in New Hampshire and developed printed and web based manuals for
species identification. Project 9 conducted field sampling and lab analyses to study microcystins in NH lakes and examine
localized impacts of blooms and implications for human health. Project 10 conducted field and laboratory studies to examine the
effects of chronic warming and nitrogen deposition on the microbial community in forest soils. Project 11 used mesocosm and
field studies of vernal pool amphibians to develop integrated wetland and upland management recommendations. Project 12
used field sampling and laboratory genetic analyses to examine the effect of forest fragmentation on dispersal of vernal
pool-breeding amphibians. Project 13 engaged and communicated with the public and stakeholders regarding natural and
agricultural resource management policies. Project 14 assessed, though surveys, the costs and benefits of natural resource
policies affecting public and private lands. Through surveys, Project 15 examined economic considerations in municipal solid
waste disposal. Project 16 using new field collections and historic herbarium specimens and records, looked a the alterations of
biodiversity patterns as a result of invasive seaweed species in the Gulf of Maine. Project 17 using filed collections and DNA
barcoding has cataloged 116 marine invertebrates from 8 phyla. Project 18 through field studies and genetic analyses has
assessed the influence of trematode parasites on the ecology of nearshore marine communities. Project 19, using electronic
tracking and data analysis has studied the home range and habitat preference of the American lobster.
2. Brief description of the target audience
For all of the research projects, the target audiences include other scientists in the respective disciplines and
students in university classrooms. For many of the projects related to natural resource management and policy, the
target audience also includes state and federal agencies, policy makers, elected officials, conservation groups, town
planners and the general public. The target audience for Projects 1, 2, 4 and 5 also includes forest ecologists,
Extension personnel, professional foresters and landowners. Project 3 results are of interest to the town of Guilford
NH and conservations groups. Project 6 is of particular interest to municipal and state water resource managers as
well as the NH Department of Agriculture. Project 13 target audiences also include a number of regional watershed
associations and commissions, plus survey practitioners and methodologists. Specific target audience for Project 14
include Cape Wind, Inc., the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, residents of Cape Cod, Martha’s Vineyard,
Nantucket and other regions where windfarms have been proposed. Project 15 is of interest to construction and
demolition waste producers and processors. Projects 16 and 17 are of interest to invasion biologist, fisheries,
aquaculture and coastal zone managers. The target audience for Project 18 also includes lobsterman.
Page 2 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
V(E). Planned Program (Outputs)
Target for the number of persons (contacts) reached through direct and indirect contact methods
1. Standard output measures
Target
Plan
Year
Direct Contacts
Adults
Indirect Contacts
Adults
Direct Contacts
Youth
Indirect Contacts
Youth
Target Target Target
6096 4400 220 4980
0 0 0 02007
Patent Applications Submitted
2. Number of Patent Applications Submitted (Standard Research Output)
Plan: 0
Year Target
2007: 0
Patents listed
TotalResearchExtension
3. Publications (Standard General Output Measure)
170 0
Number of Peer Reviewed Publications
Plan
2007
Peer-Reviewed Publications
Output Measure
●
Output #1
Year ActualTarget
2007 34 17
Chapters in Books
Output Measure
●
Output #2
Year ActualTarget
2007 9 4
Author of book or editor
Output Measure
●
Output #3
Year ActualTarget
2007 3 4
Non-peer reviewed publications including published abstracts
Output Measure
●
Output #4
Year ActualTarget
2007 39 28
V(F). State Defined Outputs
Output Target
Page 3 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
V(G). State Defined Outcomes
O No. Outcome Name
1 Peer Reviewed Publications
2 Number of Graduate Students trained
3 Number of Undergraduate students trained and/or performing investigations
4 Number of presentations/posters at regional, national or international conferences or workshops
5 Number of Grant submissions
6 Number of agencies better informed about amphibian habitat needs
7 Use of more precise biological data in making water quality statements
8 Use of biological data by aquatic entomologists
9 Number in audience of meeting presentations
10 Number of resources managers addressed
11 Number of workshops held
12 Number of websites developed
13 Public service announcement
14 Number of trade publications
15 Lake Management plans that consider biotoxin problems
16 Development of NH state drinking water program with biotoxin control
17 Foresters learning about methods to reduce spread of invasive species
18 Identification of invasive species
19 CZM manager, environmental resource groups/individuals
20 Dissemination of results to land ure planners
21 websurveys
22 Questionnaire
23 Enhance knowledge of lobsters, improve management; educate community
Page 4 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Peer Reviewed Publications
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #1
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 15 17
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
College and University administration, the scientific community, other funding agencies and proposal reviewers.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Results of the projects have been published in seventeen peer reviewed publications, 4 books, 3 MS theses, and
numerous symposium abstracts.
What has been done
Peer reviewed publications represent new knowledge. In addition to disseminating new knowledge to the scientific
community and other stakeholders, publications are one indication of research productivity. They enhance the
reputation of the NH AES and increase the competitiveness of research proposals for further studies.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code314 Toxic Chemicals, Poisonous Plants, Naturally Occurring Toxins, and Other Hazards Affecting Animals
133 Pollution Prevention and Mitigation
602 Business Management, Finance, and Taxation
213 Weeds Affecting Plants
403 Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Reuse
102 Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
605 Natural Resource and Environmental Economics
112 Watershed Protection and Management
313 Internal Parasites in Animals
132 Weather and Climate
201 Plant Genome, Genetics, and Genetic Mechanisms
304 Animal Genome
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
610 Domestic Policy Analysis
803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting Individuals, Families and Communities
123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
609 Economic Theory and Methods
Number of Graduate Students trained
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #2
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Page 5 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 26 28
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Graduate students, the college and university, and future employers are interested in a strong graduate
program that produces well trained graduates that can fill positions in government, industry and academia.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Graduate students were involved in 12 out of the 19 projects and in most cases, the project research was the focus
of the students MS thesis.
What has been done
The graduate students whose MS thesis research was based on the project have become experts in the issues
addressed. They are likely to have a continued interest in the issue and may pursue additional related studies in
the PhD work and future professional studies.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
403 Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Reuse
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
102 Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships
605 Natural Resource and Environmental Economics
315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
132 Weather and Climate
610 Domestic Policy Analysis
609 Economic Theory and Methods
133 Pollution Prevention and Mitigation
803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting Individuals, Families and Communities
123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
112 Watershed Protection and Management
304 Animal Genome
Number of Undergraduate students trained and/or performing investigations
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #3
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 27 29
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Page 6 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Undergraduate students, the college and university, graduate schools and future employers are interested in a
strong undergraduate research program that produces graduates that are well prepared for graduate school
and/or who can fill positions in government, industry and the private sector.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Twenty-nine undergraduate students were involved in 8 of the 19 projects.
What has been done
In most cases, the student developed a research report and prepared a presentation for the UNH Undergraduate
Research Conference. In some cases, the work was used to prepare an undergraduate honors thesis.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code313 Internal Parasites in Animals
102 Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships
315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection
123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
132 Weather and Climate
304 Animal Genome
Number of presentations/posters at regional, national or international conferences or workshops
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #4
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 52 49
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
It is primarily other scientists in the discipline and some industry researchers that attend scientific conferences
to learn about new and ongoing research and recent discoveries. Workshops are generally attended by
end-users interested in application of research results.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Forty-nine conference and workshop presentations were made.
What has been done
The audiences gained up-to-the-minute knowledge in their respective disciplines.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code609 Economic Theory and Methods
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
605 Natural Resource and Environmental Economics
315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting Individuals, Families and Communities
Page 7 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
313 Internal Parasites in Animals
132 Weather and Climate
112 Watershed Protection and Management
102 Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships
123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
610 Domestic Policy Analysis
Number of Grant submissions
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #5
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 9 15
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
The project PI, AES, college and university administration, other funding agencies.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
PI have been encouraged by NH AES and college administration to use AES funding to address immediate issues
in agriculture and to conduct research that will increase their ability to attract additional funding for synergistic
studies from other sources.
What has been done
Submission of proposals to competitive programs in the USDA and other funding agencies is a way of leveraging
AES formula funds. It has allowed us to find additional resources to solve issues that are central to the mission of
the AES.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code602 Business Management, Finance, and Taxation
102 Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships
213 Weeds Affecting Plants
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
201 Plant Genome, Genetics, and Genetic Mechanisms
112 Watershed Protection and Management
132 Weather and Climate
304 Animal Genome
Number of agencies better informed about amphibian habitat needs
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #6
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Page 8 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 3 1
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Wildlife and conservation biologists, agencies resposible for wildlife, wetlands and land managment as well as
citzens of the state.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
The results have been presented at several symposia and at a NH State Government workshop on vernal pools.
What has been done
NH State agencies are better informed about the importance of vernal pools.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
Use of more precise biological data in making water quality statements
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #7
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Condition Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 10 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
This outcome does not apply to any of the 2007 projects
Issue (Who cares and Why)
What has been done
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code133 Pollution Prevention and Mitigation
Page 9 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Use of biological data by aquatic entomologists
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #8
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Condition Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 100 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Aquatic entomologists, forest resource managers, land use managers and policy makers are interested in the
effects of stream and river management on the biodiversity of aquatic organisms.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
46 rivers and streams were surveyed. Biodiversity information has been presented at 2 meetings and disseminated
via publication and the 2 websites.
What has been done
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
Number in audience of meeting presentations
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #9
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 1000 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
This data is not available
Issue (Who cares and Why)
What has been done
Results
Page 10 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code313 Internal Parasites in Animals
605 Natural Resource and Environmental Economics
133 Pollution Prevention and Mitigation
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
102 Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships
610 Domestic Policy Analysis
403 Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Reuse
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
213 Weeds Affecting Plants
123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
609 Economic Theory and Methods
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting Individuals, Families and Communities
132 Weather and Climate
201 Plant Genome, Genetics, and Genetic Mechanisms
112 Watershed Protection and Management
602 Business Management, Finance, and Taxation
314 Toxic Chemicals, Poisonous Plants, Naturally Occurring Toxins, and Other Hazards Affecting Animals
315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection
304 Animal Genome
Number of resources managers addressed
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #10
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 5 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
This number is not available
Issue (Who cares and Why)
What has been done
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
112 Watershed Protection and Management
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
133 Pollution Prevention and Mitigation
Page 11 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Number of workshops held
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #11
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 10 3
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Issue (Who cares and Why)
What has been done
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
Number of websites developed
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #12
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Condition Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 6 5
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Issue (Who cares and Why)
What has been done
Results
Page 12 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection
Public service announcement
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #13
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 0 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Issue (Who cares and Why)
What has been done
None reported
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting Individuals, Families and Communities
Number of trade publications
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #14
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Action Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 10 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Issue (Who cares and Why)
What has been done
Page 13 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Number not tracked. Total number of non-peer reviewed publications was 28.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
602 Business Management, Finance, and Taxation
610 Domestic Policy Analysis
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
213 Weeds Affecting Plants
605 Natural Resource and Environmental Economics
803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting Individuals, Families and Communities
315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
132 Weather and Climate
102 Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships
201 Plant Genome, Genetics, and Genetic Mechanisms
Lake Management plans that consider biotoxin problems
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #15
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 10 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Department of Environmental Services, Department of Health, municipal water supply and recreation
departments and the public are all conserned with and potentially affected by biotoxins in natural waters.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Field sampling and lab analyses to study microcystins in NH lakes and examine localized impacts of blooms and
implications for human health.
What has been done
Knowledge of levels of biotoxins and conditions leading to blooms of microcystin producing organisms has
increased.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
133 Pollution Prevention and Mitigation
314 Toxic Chemicals, Poisonous Plants, Naturally Occurring Toxins, and Other Hazards Affecting Animals
112 Watershed Protection and Management
Development of NH state drinking water program with biotoxin control
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #16
Page 14 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 1 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Department of Environmental Services, Department of Health, municipal water supply and recreation
departments and the public are all conserned with and potentially affected by biotoxins in natural waters.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Field sampling and lab analyses to study microcystins in NH lakes and examine localized impacts of blooms and
implications for human health.
What has been done
This result has not been reported by the project investigators.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code133 Pollution Prevention and Mitigation
112 Watershed Protection and Management
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
314 Toxic Chemicals, Poisonous Plants, Naturally Occurring Toxins, and Other Hazards Affecting Animals
Foresters learning about methods to reduce spread of invasive species
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #17
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 6000 15
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Professional foresters, landowners, NH Dept of Env. Services, USDA Forest Service.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Field studies to assess the impact of glossy buckthorn, an invasive shrub that is has spread through New England
forests. Land management strategies and recommendations were developed. Field studies were conducted in early
successional habitats to determine site characteristics that affect vulnerability to invasion by alien shrubs.
Results were presented at regional and national meetings and a workshop was run for professional foresters and
landowners.
What has been done
Results
Page 15 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Many more people are aware of the presence, spread and impact of invasive shrubs. Local foresters and
landowners have adopted recommended practice to control spread.
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
Identification of invasive species
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #18
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 0 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Invasive species can alter community structure and have adverse effects on natural ecosystems.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Three studies have addressed the identification and/or control of invasive species in New England. Two have
looked at the effects and control of invasive shrubs. One has looked at the presence, distribution and impact of
invasive seaweeds in the Gulf of Maine.
What has been done
Foresters and landowners have a better understanding of how to control invasive shrubs. Seven invasive seaweed
species have been identified: 4 from Asia, 2 from Europe and 1 from the northeastern Pacific.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
213 Weeds Affecting Plants
201 Plant Genome, Genetics, and Genetic Mechanisms
CZM manager, environmental resource groups/individuals
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #19
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Page 16 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 25 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Coastal zone managers, land use managers, conservation groups, and individuals as well as the members of
the other target audienced identified on the 'Activities' page for this planned prrogram are interested in the
Natural Resource management issues that have been addressed by many of the projects.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
The Activities page of the Natural Resources and Environment Planned Program summarizes what has been done.
What has been done
Results have been detailed in Outputs, State Defined Outputs and in the responses to the other State Defined
Outcomes.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code313 Internal Parasites in Animals
314 Toxic Chemicals, Poisonous Plants, Naturally Occurring Toxins, and Other Hazards Affecting Animals
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
132 Weather and Climate
123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
133 Pollution Prevention and Mitigation
602 Business Management, Finance, and Taxation
213 Weeds Affecting Plants
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
609 Economic Theory and Methods
315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection
605 Natural Resource and Environmental Economics
102 Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships
403 Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Reuse
112 Watershed Protection and Management
201 Plant Genome, Genetics, and Genetic Mechanisms
304 Animal Genome
610 Domestic Policy Analysis
803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting Individuals, Families and Communities
Dissemination of results to land ure planners
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #20
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Page 17 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 0 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Land use planners are one sector of the target audiences for many of the projects in this Planned Program.
They are interested in the impacts of various management practices, invasive species, accuracy of forest
vegetation maps and may of the other project results.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Virtually all of the projects are or should be relavant to land use planning. Project results have been widely
disseminated and have either directly or indirectly reached land use planners.
What has been done
As a result of the NH-AES projects land use managers have greater awareness and knowledge of the effect that
managment practices might have on species diversity, environmental quality, ecosystem function, invasive
species impacts, resource conservation, public perception, and public health.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code602 Business Management, Finance, and Taxation
403 Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Reuse
132 Weather and Climate
133 Pollution Prevention and Mitigation
313 Internal Parasites in Animals
609 Economic Theory and Methods
102 Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships
304 Animal Genome
803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting Individuals, Families and Communities
315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection
610 Domestic Policy Analysis
136 Conservation of Biological Diversity
314 Toxic Chemicals, Poisonous Plants, Naturally Occurring Toxins, and Other Hazards Affecting Animals
123 Management and Sustainability of Forest Resources
213 Weeds Affecting Plants
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
605 Natural Resource and Environmental Economics
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
112 Watershed Protection and Management
201 Plant Genome, Genetics, and Genetic Mechanisms
websurveys
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #21
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Page 18 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 10000 8000
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
Policy makers, consumers, conservation groups and objective information on issues related to public policy.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Web based surveys were used as a tool in three projects. They were used extensively to engage, communicate
with and obtain input from the public and stakeholders in a study natural resource managment policies effecting a
range of issues. They were used to collect public opinion information related to the proposed windfarm construction
in Nantucket Sound. Surveys were used in a study of municipal disposal of demolition waste.
What has been done
The design, implementation and evaluation of these tools has engaged stakeholders in a variety of issues facing
the management of natural resources. It has provided policy makers with knowedge to make informed decisions
on such issues related to ecology, enviromental conservation, windfarm construction and waste disposal
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code403 Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Reuse
602 Business Management, Finance, and Taxation
803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting Individuals, Families and Communities
610 Domestic Policy Analysis
605 Natural Resource and Environmental Economics
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
609 Economic Theory and Methods
Questionnaire
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #22
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 1000 0
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
The outcome related to Questinnaires was covered under the response to Web Surveys.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
What has been done
Results
Page 19 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code609 Economic Theory and Methods
403 Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Reuse
610 Domestic Policy Analysis
605 Natural Resource and Environmental Economics
608 Community Resource Planning and Development
803 Sociological and Technological Change Affecting Individuals, Families and Communities
602 Business Management, Finance, and Taxation
Enhance knowledge of lobsters, improve management; educate community
1. Outcome Measures
Outcome #23
2. Associated Institution Types
•1862 Research
Change in Knowledge Outcome Measure
3a. Outcome Type:
3c. Qualitative Outcome or Impact Statement
2007 300 300
Year Quantitative Target Actual
3b. Quantitative Outcome
The primary audience for this study included marine biologists, other scientists and marine resource managers.
Lobsterman in particular can benefit from the increase knowledge of lobster behavior and habitat use.
Issue (Who cares and Why)
Using GIS, electronic tagging, SCUBA surveys and underwater video photography, the behavior, habitat use and
home range of American lobsters were studied. Findings were presented via a variety of methods including
publication, website, television appearance, scientific meetings, radio interviews, newspapers and museum exhibits.
What has been done
Prior to the study, the home range and behavior of lobsters were poorly understood. Scientist, resource managers
and lobsterman now have a much better understanding on shore and off shore movements of lobsters and what
triggers them, the behavior of lobsters in lobster traps, changes in home range. The results have altered people
views of lobster behavior and provided a window into the normal behavior of lobsters in their natural habitat. The
data is currently being used when marine fisheries managers debate ways to assess the health of the stocks and
the lobster industry.
Results
4. Associated Knowledge Areas
Knowledge AreaKA Code315 Animal Welfare/Well-Being and Protection
135 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife
V(H). Planned Program (External Factors)
External factors which affected outcomes
Other (See Below)●
Brief Explanation
Page 20 of 2112/03/2009Report Date
Natural Resources & Environment
Project 1 - Inadequacy of existing data for forest vegetation mapping led to the need to develop a new database with
higher spacial resolution in order to complete the project goals.
Project 11 - Lower than expected survival of amphibians in field enclosures led to development of an alternative
design.
Project 19 - The original plan was to track lobster movement year round, however the lobsters unexpectedly moved
far off-shore and out of the range of tracking antennae and out of the reach of SCUBA surveys.
1. Evaluation Studies Planned
V(I). Planned Program (Evaluation Studies and Data Collection)
● Before-After (before and after program)
● During (during program)
● Time series (multiple points before and after program)
Evaluation Results
{No Data Entered}
Key Items of Evaluation
{No Data Entered}
Page 21 of 2112/03/2009Report Date