Natural Capital Team Introductory Meeting April 20 th, 2009 Partnership for the Delaware Estuary 1.
-
Upload
luke-sparks -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Natural Capital Team Introductory Meeting April 20 th, 2009 Partnership for the Delaware Estuary 1.
Natural Capital TeamNatural Capital Team
Introductory MeetingApril 20th, 2009
Partnership for the Delaware Estuary
1
Overarching GoalOverarching Goal• To make smarts investments in restoration,
monitoring and management decisions, using limited resources, which best enhance the health and function of the DE Estuary and its resources
• Better Restoration Decisions• Climate Adaptation• Ranking and Prioritizing Projects• Target Case Study Areas
Natural Capital Team Goals: Natural Capital Team Goals: This YearThis Year
2
Climate Ready EstuariesClimate Ready Estuaries• Climate Predictions: 2050 & 2100
• Vulnerability Assessments: Resource response to physical stressors of climate change
• Drinking Water• Bivalve Shellfish• Tidal Wetlands
• Natural Capital• Quantified assessment of resource damage• Quantified intervention by restoration actions
• Management Recommendations• Damages expected• Intervention and Adaptation activities
3
Regional RestorationRegional Restoration• Project Registry & Matrix
– Comprehensive list of projects– To be sorted and ranked
• Case Study Areas– Tidal Wetlands– Benthic Species (Bivalve Shellfish)– Urban Waterfront Restoration– Headwater Streams
• Natural Capital– Assessment of restoration options– Tool to rank projects based on ecoservice benefits
4
RRWG Only
Shared Case Studies
Climate Only
Partnership Work Group Structure – Partnership Work Group Structure – Natural Capital Team ConnectionNatural Capital Team Connection
5
Examples of Ecosystem Service/Natural Capital Valuations
6
New Jersey Natural Capital StudyNew Jersey Natural Capital StudyGoal: Impact of resources on human economy
– Even if market doesn’t reflect directly, indirect methods are used to determine economy’s dependence
Benefits– Big, shocking numbers! –Publicly accessible– Closer to true costs of resource to humans
Drawbacks– Incomplete (i.e. wetlands)– Expensive studies– Static Numbers don’t account for: loss, climate impacts, recession,
spatial differences– Missing ecological dimension: system health & function– Unclear how to translate to policy decisions 7
New Jersey’s Natural Capital New Jersey’s Natural Capital The ecosystem services evaluated
1. Climate and atmospheric gas regulation 2. Disturbance prevention:3. Freshwater regulation and supply 4. Waste assimilation:5. Nutrient regulation 6. Habitat refugium 7. Soil retention and formation:8. Recreation 9. Aesthetic and amenity:10. Pollination Non-Market Economic Valuation Techniques
Avoided Cost (AC): services allow society to avoid costs that would have been incurred in the absence of those services; flood control provided by barrier islands avoids property damages along the coast.
Replacement Cost (RC): services could be replaced with man-made systems; nutrient cycling waste treatment can be replaced with costly treatment systems. Factor Income (FI): services provide for the enhancement of incomes; water quality improvements increase commercial fisheries catch and incomes of fishermen. Travel Cost (TC): service demand may require travel, whose costs can reflect the implied value of the service; recreation areas attract distant visitors whose value placed on
that area must be at least what they were willing to pay to travel to it, including the imputed value of their time. Hedonic Pricing (HP): service demand may be reflected in the prices people will pay for associated goods: For example, housing prices along the coastline tend to exceed
the prices of inland homes. Marginal Product Estimation (MP): Service demand is generated in a dynamic modeling environment using a production function (i.e., Cobb-Douglas) to estimate the
change in the value of outputs in response to a change in material inputs. Contingent Valuation (CV): service demand may be elicited by posing hypothetical scenarios that involve some valuation of alternatives; e.g., people generally state that
they would be willing to pay for increased preservation of beaches and shoreline. Group Valuation (GV): This approach is based on principles of deliberative democracy and the assumption that public decision making should result, not from the
aggregation of separately measured individual preferences, but from open public debate.
8
University of Delaware – Valuation of University of Delaware – Valuation of the Christina River Basinthe Christina River Basin
Classic Benefit Transfer Analysis– Compilation of literature values applied to Christina Basin– Used studies like New Jersey’s Natural Capital report
Benefits– Cheap, easy, and fast analysis– Attempts more accurate reflection of human economy’s indirect
dependence on natural resources – Could be very useful in Drinking Water Case Study
Drawbacks– Outputs only as good as quality of supporting literature values– Misses ecological health and function component – Danger in $ amounts 9
Valuation of the Christina BasinValuation of the Christina Basin
10
Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA)Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA)
Tool used to assess Damages & Restoration– Climate Impacts as Injury to resource
Benefits– Hits ecosystem health & function– Nationally recognized tool– Can integrate with Cost/Benefit analysis – Easy model to use
Drawbacks– Outputs only as good as the supporting science– Ample room for judgment calls– Isn’t appropriate for all services (i.e. cultural,
11
Industrial Economics - DE StudyIndustrial Economics - DE Study
• Example of HEA Application• Supporting Science: SLAMM model & Primary
Productivity• Wetland response to climate for portions of
New Jersey• Potential for expansion to Estuary
12
GIS - Priority AreasGIS - Priority Areas• Place-Based Restoration & Conservation
• Examples: InVEST, Smart Conservation Model, The Natural Conservancy – eco-region based portfolios
• Prioritize projects based on areas with highest overlap of eco-services
• Benefits• Great visual product• Spatial relationships very useful
• Drawbacks• Outputs limited by state of science • Overconfidence in maps & layers • Overlap assumes maximization of ecosystem health
13
EPA - Ecosystem Services Research EPA - Ecosystem Services Research Program (ESRP)Program (ESRP)
How do we….
1. Engage with ESRP?2. Integrate ORD research into ecosystem service valuation? 3. Adapt new information into our models/analysis?
14
Big QuestionsBig Questions
• How much can we accomplish in a year?
• Appropriate Scales?
• Others?
15
Thinking in terms of ServicesThinking in terms of Services1 Service 2 Service 3 Service
Provisioning
Food Fisheries Support Algae and invertebrate productionFresh WaterGenetic MaterialsFiber and FuelBiochemical products
Regulating
Nutrient SequestrationSediment Stabilization
Storm Protection/ Wave AttenuationGas Regulation Carbon Sequestration Oxygen production
Flood ProtectionWaste Water Treatment
Water Quality Water clarity, N, PWater Supply
Cultural/ Spiritual/ Human Well Being
Recreation Bird huntingSpiritual and InspirationalEducationalAesthetic Value
Supporting
Habitat Wildlife Habitat/Maintain FaunaBiodiversity Maintain Plant CommunitiesProduction Primary ProductionWater Cycling/Hydrologic Regime
Nutrient Cycling/Biogeochemical Processes16
Wetlands Case StudyWetlands Case Study
• HEA – Assess injury & damages from climate– Assess restoration & adaptation options
• Inputs from IEc Study• Economic valuations of replacement costs of
services???• GIS – modeling service layers???
17
Wetlands Case StudyWetlands Case Study
18
Shellfish Case StudyShellfish Case Study
• HEA• Economic analysis of harvest industry
impacts?• GIS – mapping of populations/services???
19
Drinking Water Case StudyDrinking Water Case Study
• Economic Models– Replacement Costs Analysis– Avoided Cost Analysis
• Potential Use of NRDA process???
20
Next StepsNext Steps1. NC Team commitment to case studies2. Refine service lists & vulnerabilities3. Decisions:
– Tools to use for case studies?– How to scale work for coming year?
4. Literature Search – NRDA Settlements– Resource response to stressors & restoration
• Biology, ecology, infrastructure– Restoration & adaptation options– Gaps & Best Professional Judgment
5. Develop plan for GIS components6. Prep for June meeting of Climate Workgroup
21