NATIONAL WESTERN CENTER HEALTH EDUCATION OUTREACH CENTER PROGRAM PLAN

APRIL 2016

1

Table of contents

1) Executive summary Pg 3 2) Justification Pg 3

a. Program information b. Existing conditions Pg 4

i. Current enrollment (CSU) ii. College space needs summary table

c. New space requirements Pg 5

i. Room/area sf by function d. Alternative analysis Pg 5

3) Project Description Pg 6 i. Architectural narrative Pg 6

ii. Structural narrative Pg 6 iii. Mechanical/electrical/Utility narrative Pg 6-14 iv. Hazardous Materials Pg 14 v. LEED Goal Pg 14

vi. Flood mitigation analysis Pg 14 vii. Applicable codes Pg 15-22

4) Project Schedule, cost estimates, financing Pg 22 i. Project schedule and phasing

ii. Proposed financing plan iii. Cost estimate/methodology

5) Appendices a. Utility map b. Flood plain map c. AZ building current 1st and 2nd floor plans d. Site plan, floor plans and Renderings e. Alternate options floor plans f. Project budget g. Equipment list h. LEED checklist

2

Executive Summary The National Western Center Health Education Outreach Center will be located on Colorado State University’s Main Campus, through construction of an addition to the existing Anatomy Zoology building. The proposed project will add approximately 39,600 gsf of new space that will include student study areas, anatomy computer lab, gross anatomy lab, neuro anatomy lab, office space for an outreach coordinator, support spaces and cooler space. Core and shell space for future National Western Center programs has been identified as an alternate. The estimated cost is $23.3M. The College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences has been approved for $1,000,000 in funding from the University Facility Fee Advisory Board, and the remaining $22.3M will be financed by National Western Center COP funds.

CSU’s involvement at the National Western Center (NWC) is a vital component of continued growth in agricultural innovation, creating research and development opportunities, showcasing Colorado’s innovation economy on both the national and international stage, and creating public-private partnerships with major industries to advance STEM disciplines. This facility is a critical piece of a larger strategy to make in-depth science exploration available to diverse students. Students whose interest is sparked by visiting the National Western Center in Denver could have the opportunity to continue their education with a week long “Anatomy Camp” at CSU’s Fort Collins campus. In this way the NWC’s programming and facilities become a pathway for engaging diverse students and exciting their passion for STEM subjects.

Justification

Program Information

The purpose of this addition is to increase enrollment in Human Anatomy and Neuroanatomy classes and provide outreach opportunities to a diverse set of students, while providing a state of the art environment for working with human specimens. The anatomy program currently serves over 700 students per year across all colleges, and current wait lists for classes in the human anatomy program range from 50-100 per semester. There is no opportunity for outreach, as the gross anatomy laboratory is heavily scheduled year round. The anticipated growth of health related fields and the new Neuroscience major in the College of Natural Sciences will add to the demand for these classes. The extensive use of human specimens provides a unique opportunity for CSU undergraduate students to palpate, manipulate and investigate all parts of a human cadaver, with typically 4-5 students per cadaver. (for comparison, the University of Colorado has a ratio of about 200 students per cadaver). Upon completion of BMS301 (Human Gross Anatomy) some students continue on to take Human Anatomy Dissection (BMS575), again with teams of 4 students/cadaver. Incorporation of smart technology in the new lab will provide specialized computer workstations at every cadaver, allowing students to view a virtual human cadaver to compare to the actual one. These programs are vital to teach the cross sectional anatomy required by current medical imaging techniques.

3

Existing Conditions Human anatomy labs are taught in the existing gross anatomy lab which is shared with the Professional Veterinary Program, limiting lab sections for both. In addition, cooler space in the existing lab is fully occupied with veterinary medicine specimens, so cadavers must be stored in a cooler on the second floor. Cadavers are moved frequently, traveling through several public hallways and a service elevator. This is not a desirable situation for many reasons and fluids can spill during transport. In addition, the gross lab is crowded and poorly ventilated. The upgrade of the ventilation system has been identified as an alternate in this project.

Existing Gross anatomy lab in use

4

New Space Requirements The table below identifies the type and GSF of new space required.

Alternative analysis Multiple iterations of this design were developed, ranging from a second story laboratory addition to accommodate just the gross lab and cooler through the current concept. Colocation with the existing gross lab is deemed desirable for faculty and students. A summary of the options is shown below:

1. 2nd floor addition with reduced gross lab (accommodate 20 cadavers), neuro lab, computer lab and cooler: $8.0M

2. 2nd floor addition with full size gross lab (accommodate 30 cadavers), cooler, neuro lab and HVAC improvement to existing gross lab: $16.1M

3. 2nd floor addition as discussed in #2, and single story addition on the west to include flat floor classroom and computer lab: $20.1M 4. 2nd floor addition and two story addition on the west end to include auditorium, computer lab and student study: $22.9M 5. 4 story addition to the east of AZ with full size gross lab (30 cadavers), neuro lab, coolers, support space, computer lab and core and shell alternates

(Note: the estimated cost of HVAC improvements to the existing gross lab to improve the number of air changes per hour to 24 is approximately $1.3M).

Description GSF

Human Gross Anatomy Lab 5,100

Neuroanatomy Lab 2,850

Computer lab 2,200

Cooler 1,600

Storage space 1,043

Locker/shower 1,100

K-12 outreach coordinator 750

NWC future program space (alternate) 19,350

Circulation 5,607

Total 39,600

5

Project Description Architectural Narrative The project is envisioned as a 4 story addition at the east of the Anatomy Zoology building. Dominant materials for the building will be steel and glass, with composite metal panels in the spandrels. Local sandstone will be used for columns and a signature wall. A clerestory will provide natural light to the auditorium. Floor heights will match the existing AZ building. The building will have exterior landscaping to address the new science quad and a delivery dock on the south side. Easily cleanable surfaces are required in the laboratory spaces. Structural Narrative It is anticipated that a steel frame with concrete shear walls will be utilized in the construction of the new addition. Cast in place concrete over corrugated steel deck will comprise the floor system. All of this will be supported on a cast in place concrete foundation systems. In addition, any spaces or labs which require vibration sensitive equipment will be designed to meet vibration criterion. All structural design will be performed in accordance with the current International Building Code and will adhere to design and construction standards of Colorado State University. Mechanical/Electrical Narrative HVAC Systems General: Gross Anatomy Labs pose a high risk of exposure to Formaldehyde and Formalin. These chemicals have strict exposure limits identified in OSHA as follows:

- 0.75 PPM over an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) - 2.0 PPM over a 15 minute short term exposure limit (STEL)

Exposure to these chemicals is highest when the chest cavity of a cadaver is opened, due to the fluid stored in the chest cavity. Since most labs occur for 3-4 hours, it is critical to achieve the 0.75 ppm TWA in the breathing zone.

Formaldehyde vapor has a specific gravity of 1.07 which is slightly heavier than air, however is miscible with air so it will follow air patterns and will not pool or separate on its own.

Project Goals: Provide a flexible space for moveable cadaver tables or humidors, keeping line of sight open for instruction and provide ventilation for safety of the occupants. Improve air quality in the existing gross anatomy lab on the first floor to 24 air changes per hour. Energy Conservation is also a goal but comes 2nd to occupant safety.

Current Industry Trends: Two HVAC options that are in common use across the country for University Gross Anatomy Teaching Labs are: installation of downdraft tables or setting the entire lab up as a downdraft environment. Both options will be presented here with pros and cons discussed, even though CSU has

6

indicated that the downdraft environment is the preferred option at this time. The building design team should reaffirm that this is still the preferred option at design kickoff.

Two Universities were observed for this program plan. At the University of Colorado Denver (UCD), Anschutz Medical Campus, downdraft tables with side slots are used to pull the air away from the cadaver into the table and then exhausted to a vertical in-room chase. The control system is sophisticated in that each table is connected to a VAV box and is automatically enabled once the humidor/table lid is open, based on proximity sensors mounted under the table where the lid rests during research. The downside to this arrangement is that the vertical chases obstruct views across the room, thereby making instruction of students more difficult. It also impedes the ability to make the room flexible for humidor layout.

At the University of California – San Francisco (UCSF), the entire room was developed as a down draft environment. They use movable autopsy tables rather than humidors. The space was modeled with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to determine the best approach for supply air and exhaust air. Supply air is delivered with overhead Radial Diffusers and low wall (under wall) exhaust around the entire perimeter of the room. This was accomplished with dual purpose fur-out walls such that the exhaust is pulled up off the floor into the wall and then ducted from the wall to the exhaust system (refer to diagrams 1-3).

UCD Anschutz Gross Anatomy Lab

7

Airflow diagram for down draft environment

Fig 1

UCSF Gross Anatomy Lab

8

Additional research shows that the University of Western States and Vanderbilt are similar to UCSF. University of Arizona, Yale and University of New Mexico are similar to UCD.

CFD Modeling: a rigorous CFD modeling effort should be performed for either option.

Close up detail of Low Air return

Fig 2

Air flow diagram for down draft tables

Fig 3

9

Environment: Temperature ranges should be 72° F for heating and cooling (note: CSU Standards require the ability to adjust cooling set point to 78° F). Humidity control needs to be reviewed with the owner in detail, as adding and/or removing humidity is a large energy cost.

Supply Air: Air handling units will reside on the roof or in a penthouse mechanical room and provide the building with conditioned air. Based on the current design, the anticipated total airflow for the building is 100,000 cfm. Distribution for the auditorium and non-lab spaces will be by medium pressure ductwork to the floors and then distributed to the spaces by variable air volume boxes with reheat coils. Distribution to the Gross Anatomy Labs are anticipated to be single zone with dedicated AHU’s in order to provide the correct temperature without having to cool and re-heat the air, which would waste energy. The Gross Anatomy Labs are anticipated to be sized to accommodate 30 air changes per hour (ACH) in order to match the UCSF gross anatomy lab. Air handling units are proposed to be sized as follows: AHU-1 (2nd Floor Gross Anatomy Lab) = 51,000 cfm AHU-2 (1st Floor Gross Anatomy Lab) = 23,000 cfm AHU-3 (Auditorium, General spaces) = 15,000 cfm The 1st floor Anatomy Lab will need to be renovated to provide the increased airflow amount of 24 air changes per hour. Modifications to the mechanical system are anticipated in order to disconnect the existing ductwork from the main building system, cap the existing ductwork and rebalance the supply air system. The existing system was designed to accommodate only about 13,000 cfm of air so new ductwork and diffusers/grilles are recommended. The new work could be performed in two phases depending on budget and schedule. The first phase would include simply reconnecting the existing ductwork to the new AHU-2, however it should be noted that using the existing ductwork may result in higher velocity air and noise generation due to high velocity. The second phase would be to replace the old ductwork with new larger ductwork and new diffusers to achieve the increased airflow amounts. The same type of phasing would need to occur on the exhaust system serving this space. Exhaust Air: Lab exhaust will be slightly higher than the lab supply in order to create a pressure gradient to control contaminants and odors. This lab exhaust will either be routed to a parallel air tunnel adjacent to the supply air handling unit to recover energy via a heat pipe or air-air heat exchanger. Energy Recovery wheels shall not be considered due to the leakage and possibility of recirculating contaminated air. Another option is to use remote exhaust fans (if a Penthouse option is chosen) and recover heat via a run-around glycol loop or an Intelligent High Efficiency Energy Recovery System (i.e. Konvekta). General exhaust system will exhaust the restrooms, janitor closets, copier rooms and other sources of contaminants. Wind Study: A wind study should be considered in order to optimize the exhaust stack heights based on the formaldehyde concentration and the neighboring buildings and major pedestrian spine of the campus adjacent to this new addition. Return Air: Return air will be brought back to AHU-3 only. Low velocity ductwork will be used. The return fan for the associated air handling unit will use a variable speed drive. Based on the current design, the anticipated total return airflow for the first proposed building is approximately 14,000 cfm.

Energy Monitoring: The building automation system shall have metering in place to allow energy monitoring and therefore give building operators an ability to identify inappropriately high energy use.

10

Air Handling Units: The air handling units serving the gross anatomy labs will be equipped with pre-filters, final filters, energy recovery coils, pre-heat coils, cooling coil, evaporative cooler, and supply fan section. All fans in these air handlers will have variable speed drives. Fan wall construction is anticipated. Indirect evaporative cooling should also be considered for additional energy savings during the cooling season. The air handling unit serving the auditorium and computer lab space will be similar, however will not have energy recovery and will have a return fan.

Heating Hot Water: Supply and return piping will be distributed from the steam/hot water converters to the terminal air boxes, unit heaters, and fan coil units. It shall be assumed the existing building heating system cannot accommodate this new expansion, however there may be space in the existing mechanical room to house the new exchangers and pumps.

Chilled Water: Chilled water piping will be provided from the campus district cooling plant system which will be distributed to air handling units and to support spaces for equipment cooling such as the walk-in cooler. Evaporative cooling should be considered to supplement the chilled water system.

Steam: The Campus district heating system serving this building will provide required steam for heating and domestic hot water loads. Steam to hot water converters will be used for heating water and domestic water heaters.

Controls: This facility will allow either Johnson Controls or Alerton Controls DDC system which will be tied to the campus-wide building automation system. Special control features shall be investigated for energy savings and formaldehyde sensing as follows:

1) Formaldehyde Sensor panels with digital read-outs in PPM shall be placed within the room. The panel shall have visual and audible alarms as well as an override feature to maximize the ventilation.

2) Vacancy Sensors to set back airflow when unoccupied. 3) Schedule override feature to set back airflow even further in between semesters when cadavers

are not present. 4) Oxygen depletion sensors. 5) For the ventilated humidor option, integrated controls to have an individual VAV box per

humidor with proximity sensor such that the VAV enables only when the humidor lid is open.

High Performance Building Considerations:

1) Direct/Indirect evaporative cooling can effectively cool buildings for most of the year to minimize the amount of chilled water used. This type of cooling is very effective with a dry climate like Colorado. Chilled water cooling can be used to supplement this cooling when it is humid outside and the load cannot be achieved with evaporative cooling.

2) Alternative Energy Recovery system called “Konvekta” could be used in order to increase energy savings as well as shorten the length of the air handling units since this system uses a single coil to control the discharge temperature instead of 3 coils.

3) Energy use comparison should be considered for comparison of a ducted humidor versus the open room concept.

11

Site Mechanical Utilities: Due to the size of this new addition, a new steam and chilled water connection may be required. The total projected loads for the addition and remodel are as follows:

Heating Load = 6,738,000 Btu/hr = 7300 lb/hour steam Cooling Load = 323 Tons = 520 gpm (based on a 15 deg delta T)

Plumbing Systems Water: Domestic cold water service will be provided from the campus utilities. The services will enter the building and be provided with dual backflow preventers per CSU Standards. It will then be distributed to a potable water system for restrooms, janitors closets, break rooms, etc. The domestic water line serving this new addition is anticipated to be a 2” pipe. Hot water will be generated from steam heat exchangers and will be distributed to the building through the utility shafts and will be re-circulated by means of pumps. The hot water line serving this addition is anticipated to be a 1-1/2” pipe.

Waste and Vent: Waste and vent will be collected in a cast iron piping system and routed to the sanitary sewer.

Water Conservation: Plumbing fixtures will be selected to provide substantially reduced water use (Water Closet = 1.28 gallons/flush; Urinals = 1/8 gallon/flush; Lavatories = 0.5 gpm).

Wash Down: Consideration shall be given for a water wash down station to clean the floor. However, some institutions such as UCSF did not include floor drains or a wash down system and appeared very sanitary.

Fire Protection The building will be fully sprinkled. Electrical Service The existing electrical service to the building is expected to be adequate for the project. Electrical Distribution The electrical distribution system will provide power for lighting and equipment operation. The primary equipment load will be from the mechanical system including three (3) air handlers, steam and chilled water heat exchangers and hot water distribution pumps. Energy efficient lighting and controls will be used to minimize power demand and consumption. In addition, natural lighting should be provided to minimize use of electricity. Telecommunications Telecommunications fiber connection is required for this project to provide remote monitoring and control through the CSU Johnson Control system. The existing fiber connection to the building is shown below and will be unaffected by the addition.

12

Utilities Narrative Electric

No impact to electric utility foreseen, as the existing high voltage distribution is outside of proposed footprint. Current service to the building consists of two 1000 KVA services; one loaded to 512 kW and the other to 198 kW.

Outdoor Lighting Some existing outdoor lighting will be impacted. It is assumed the poles in question will be removed and the lighting replaced by other sources installed during the project. Domestic Water No impact to this utility. Natural Gas The proposed footprint impacts the existing 3” gas line. This line is scheduled for replacement during FY15 using Controlled Maintenance funds, and will be routed clear of the proposed footprint at that time. No cost impact to the building project is expected. Sanitary Sewer Replacement - $15,000

Building footprint impacts approximately 35 feet of 4” sanitary sewer exiting the south side of the existing Gross Anatomy lab. This is an old jointed line and will need to be replaced with new PVC.

Upsize - $70,000 It is possible that this line may need to be increased in size, depending on the load of the addition. If so, approximately 300 feet of new sanitary will be required to MH A2-2. Storm Sewer No existing storm infrastructure is impacted. As with all new construction at present and in the future, permanent, on-site detention and water quality features are required for runoff management. Runoff from the finished site must be at or less than historical volumes.

13

District Heating

The stair tower and building foundation need to be clear of the steam and condensate by a minimum of 4 feet. If building footprint cannot clear by the 4’ minimum, the steam and condensate will need to be shifted. Cost of shifting 45 feet of these lines could be on the order of $50,000 and is not preferable.

Capacity The Gross Anatomy Addition will be a very energy-intensive building. To place it in context, the approximately 30,000 square feet addition/renovation will have about the same steam loading as the proposed 60,000 square foot Chemistry Building. The District Heating utility is near maximum. Investment in a very high efficiency heat recovery system (e.g. Konvecta-type system) is recommended.

District Cooling

Existing 22” chilled water mains will run under the open breezeway on the south side of the addition. This is undesirable but acceptable given that these lines will be extremely difficult to move. The HDPE lines will lie under the slab of the breezeway but have no mechanical joints or connection points along their length, so risk of pipe failure is low. In the event of failure, excavation under the slab of the breezeway will be required. The stair tower, any caissons, and building foundations need to be clear of the chilled water lines by a minimum of 4 feet. Load bearing elements must be designed to spread their loads where they cross these lines.

Capacity The Gross Anatomy Addition will be a very energy-intensive building. To place it in context, the approximately 30,000 square feet addition/renovation will have about the same chilled water needs as the proposed 60,000 square foot Chemistry Building. The chilled water utility is near maximum. The next load placed on it will trigger a $250,000 project to regain chilled water capacity at the main plants. Hazardous Materials The Anatomy Zoology Building was built in 1973. Tie-in points for new construction will need to be assessed for friable and non-friable roofing components (flashings, felt etc.). In addition asbestos containing ceiling tile, floor tile and mastic will need to be addressed in renovated or impacted areas as well as CMU fill if walls are demolished.

LEED Goal/Fort Collins Utility Rebate Program Senate Bill 07-051 directs that state buildings undergoing substantial renovation or new construction conform to the High Performance Certification Program. The Office of the State Architect has stated that USGBC LEED-NC Gold is the targeted standard of this program, or at a minimum, the highest obtainable LEED standard. The most current LEED publication at the time of design will be used. The inclusion of high performance standards is an integral part of the project, beginning at the program plan stage.

The goal of this project is LEED Gold.

Flood Mitigation Analysis The first Master Drainage Plan for CSU was completed by Ayres Associates in June 1996. On July 28, of the following year, Fort Collins experienced a significant storm event that caused approximately $150 million in

14

damages to campus facilities. Very few of the master planned facilities were constructed prior to the 1997 flood. A draft Master Plan Update was completed in January 2001 with the purpose of identifying the best possible drainage improvement alternatives. The current Master Plan Update was completed by Ayres Associates in April 2008 and includes the as-built analysis of the Phase I and II improvements that were constructed.

The existing floodplain on the CSU campus is the result of the following:

• Off-site flows entering the CSU campus from the City of Fort Collins Canal Importation Basin. These flows enter campus from the west side of Shields with a particular concentration at the Shields and Elizabeth Street intersection.

• CSU campus encompasses approximately 375 acres of mixed use development. Much of the campus is developed and highly impervious (which generates a lot of runoff) with the exception of the open space and recreation fields.

• Existing storm drainage system is small and complex, and provides very little conveyance capacity during large storm events, so most of the storm flows travel via overland or surface flow.

The current Master Drainage Plan document is a summary of the work that has been done, and also provides a guide for additional work that still needs to be done. This Master Plan also serves as a warning as to the complexity and sensitivity of CSU’s storm drainage system. No additional work of any kind should be done without looking at the impacts to the storm drainage conveyance and flooding elevations. This project lies outside of the floodplain as currently envisioned.

CSU Standards The CSU Building Construction Standards Manual is available at: http://www.facilities.colostate.edu/index.asp?url=construction/constr_standards

The CSU Standards are to be used as guidelines for design. They are divided into 3 parts for use by Architects and Engineers: the first part is administrative; the second part discusses requirements for design and deliverables at each stage of the design process; the third part consists of the technical standards arranged by CSI division. The Standards are a work in progress, and as such, any question about the applicability of a standard should be discussed with the project manager. The Standards should never be referenced or copied in Contract Documents – the design is expected to embody and conform to the Standards. Contractors are not to be directed to review the Standards as a contract requirement.

Code analysis by Steven Hall Architects

The existing Anatomy / Zoology (A/Z) building was constructed circa 1970. It is a four-story concrete structure with a basement. It serves as teaching and research facility with the more public “teaching” areas located on the 1st & 2nd floors. The facility contains one large Dissection Laboratory (room W117) located on the 1st floor. This report summarizes the potential code compliance ramifications of adding another Dissection Laboratory of similar size to the one in room W117, with similar support spaces, to be located directly above the existing lab. Furthermore, a two-story addition including sloped auditorium seating, a computer lab, a student study lounge and a mechanical room is planned for the southwest side of the building. The building appears to have a fire barrier splitting through the building at roughly grid 9 (the west face of the 4-story portion of the building). The only practical reason for this is to create separate fire zones at each floor.

15

Fire Zones don’t have a big advantage under current codes, but do lend some mitigation to the lack of a fire sprinkler system in floors 1 through 4. Furthermore, in the 1990’s, a new building (Yates Hall) was constructed abutting the A/Z building. It appears to have a two-hour separation, but it is unclear if it is a true Fire Wall as would be required to consider it a separate building. We have not analyzed the Yates Building. The new addition will be fully sprinklered. The travel distance to the 2nd means of egress may require another stair tower unless the entire travel path is not sprinklered. The building is described as follows: Higher Education Classroom Building (B), Auditoriums (A-3, but are considered Accessory Use) Stories: 4 (with Basement) Height: Roof at 54 ft, 4th floor at 40’-6” Construction Type: I-B NFPA 45 Lab Classification: Unknown at this time. If CSU needs to pursue compliance, this will need to be

researched further. Are Corridors rated: Yes 1 hr required Fire Alarm System: Yes (manual system with some automatic detection) Fire Sprinkler: Partial – In Basement Only.

Basement 21,600 s.f. 1st Floor 45,488 s.f. 5,158 s.f. (1st Floor Addition) 2nd Floor 30,854 s.f. 16,530 s.f. (2nd Floor Addition) 3rd Floor 31,089 s.f. 4th Floor 15,781 s.f. Total 144,812 s.f. 166,500 s.f. (After Addition)

A. Applicable Codes:

At the writing of this report, the 2012 IBC is the adopted building code by the Office of the State Architect. It is assumed that the 2012 IBC family of codes will be in effect at the time that this project is constructed, therefore we have used them as the basis for this review.

As this building contains numerous teaching and research laboratories, NFPA 45 is a reference code standard that may be considered to apply to this building. The Office of the State Architect does not require compliance to this code, however CSU may be subject to it, if funding for the project is tied to a Federal Grant or Program. We have not reviewed the project for compliance to this code.

B. Occupancy Groups & Special Use Requirements:

The following Incidental Uses are required to be protected or separated per IBC Table 509

Boiler Room (over 15psi & 10 HP): 1-hour separation or Sprinkler System Furnace Room (if equip exceeds 400,000 BTU/h): 1-hour separation or Sprinkler System Refrigeration Machinery: 1-hour separation or Sprinkler System Waste and linen collection rooms over 100 sf: 1-hr separation Hydrogen Cut-Off Rooms: 1-hr separation in B Occupancies Labs and Vocational Shops in E or I-2: 1-hr sep or Sprinkler Sys – Not Applicable to this bldg.

16

This building is not considered a Mixed Occupancy. Occupancy Separations are not required per (IBC 508).

Electrical room separation, 1-hr separation may be required if transformers exceed 112.5 KVA. NEC 450-21(b)

A fire pump room needs to be rated per NFPA 20, which is referenced from IFC 913.2. The building does not currently have a fire pump, but may be needed if the building becomes fully sprinklered.

The first and second floors of this building are open to each other at an open stair. This is allowed for Exit Access Stairways (non-required exits) in non-sprinklered buildings per IBC 1009.3 exception 1. It appears that this building complies.

Fire sprinkler system is required in the basement of this building per IBC 903.2.11.1. The basement is currently sprinklered.

The full building is not required to be fully fire sprinklered due to any special occupancy or height requirements per IBC 903. However, certain hazardous materials storage and dispensing rooms do require fire sprinkler systems. Furthermore, current codes encourage the use of sprinkler systems and allow numerous reductions in other code requirements when employed. One of the most advantageous reductions are an elimination of rated corridors and all of the fire smoke damper requirements. Another advantage is the allowed increase in the amount of hazardous material within the building (see hazardous materials discussion below).

Stand pipes are required in this building due to its height. Since the building is not currently sprinklered, Class III standpipes are required, however if the building becomes fully fire sprinklered, then Class I standpipes may be employed. IBC 905.3.1

A Fire Alarm system is required in this building per: IBC 907.2.2 (B occup. with more than 100 occupants above or below exit level). There is an existing fire alarm system in this building. It is a Notifier System, and does not appear to have a voice announcement feature.

Hazardous Materials: This building is assumed to be a “B” occupancy laboratory building, which means that the quantity of hazardous materials is restricted to certain quantities within defined Control Areas. The building is not currently fire sprinklered, and as such the quantities of hazardous materials allowed is restricted to the quantities listed in IBC Tables 307.1(1) and 307.1(2). Adding a sprinkler system throughout the building will allow some increased quantities.

IBC Table 414.2.2 discusses the quantities of hazardous materials allowed per control area on a given floor (story) of the building. The second floor is limited to 75% of the quantities listed in the general allowable amounts table. Depending upon the quantities of chemicals required to operate the new proposed lab space, the new project may need to isolate the lab as its own control area with a 1-hr separation.

C. Allowable Floor Area (Sq. Ft.):

Construction Type I-B non-sprinklered: Per IBC Table 503, B occupancy is unlimited in size.

D. Height & Number of Stories: IBC Table 503

Const Type: I – B

B 4 < 11 O.K.

17

(54’ ± to ave ht of highest roof per IBC 504.1) < 110’ (base height) OK

E. Type of Construction: IBC Table 601 Type I-B The original (circa 1970) building plans called for Type 1 construction, which translates into current Type I-B construction. [Note: There is no apparent advantage to try to classify this building as a Type I-A.]

Table 601 Requirements: I-B Structural Frame 2 Bearing Walls Exterior ** 2 ** but not less than required by Table 602, see Section F of this report Non-bearing exterior walls ---- Per Table 602, see Section F of this report---- Bearing Interior Walls 2 Non-bearing interior Partitions 0 Floor construction 2 Roof construction 1 Stairway Enclosures: Where enclosures are required (see Section G of this report),

1-hr fire barrier (connecting 3 stories or less, including basements), 2-hr fire barrier (connecting 4 stories or more including basements). IBC 1022.2

Shafts: 1-hr fire barrier (connecting 3 stories or less, including basements),

2-hr fire barrier (connecting 4 stories or more including basements), but not less than the floor(s) being penetrated. IBC 713.3

Elevator Shafts: 1-hr fire barrier (connecting 3 stories or less, including basements),

2-hr fire barrier (connecting 4 stories or more including basements), but not less than the floor(s) being penetrated. IBC 713.14

Elevator Lobbies: Elevator Lobbies are required per 713.14.1 at every elevator that connects more than

3 stories including basements. [If the building is sprinklered and not a high rise, the elevator lobby requirement is waived]. This building appears to be non-compliant under current codes.

In the structural analysis (see section I below), it is recommended to use a steel structure for the 2nd floor addition. If this recommendation is followed, the fire-resistive ratings indicated above will need to be maintained to protect the steel elements.

F. Location on Property: Tables 602 & 705.8

Exterior opening maximum areas in table 705.8 may use the “protected” criteria only if an NFPA 13 sprinkler system is added to the building. IBC 705.8.1. The following criteria shall govern: I-B Construction ExteriorBearing & % Unprotected % Protected Occupancy Bearing Walls Exterior Openings Exterior Openings

B 1 HR < 5’ Not permitted ≤ 5’ Not permitted ≤ 3’ 1 HR ≥ 5’,< 10’ 10% >5’, ≤10’ 25% >5’, ≤10’ 1 HR ≥ 10’, <30’ 15% >10’, ≤15’ 45% >10’, ≤15’

18

NR ≥ 30’ 25% >15’, ≤20’ 75% >15’, ≤20’ 45% >20’, ≤25’ No Limit >20’ 70% >25’, ≤30’ No Limit > 30’

The current yard separations appear to be: North >30 feet East >30 feet

South >30 feet West 0 feet **

** It is assumed that a 2-hr rated fire wall was constructed between the Anatomy Building and Yates Hall when Yates was constructed. We recommend that the design A/E review the original Yates construction drawings to verify. If there is no Fire Wall, then Yates would have needed to have been Type I construction to have been added to this building.

As the other yard separations exceed 30 feet, the Building appears to not require any protection due to location on property.

G. Occupancy Loads & Egress Requirements: Below is our calculation of occupant load per Table 1004.1.2:

Existing Proposed Occupant Load Basement: 192 192 First Floor: 831 987 Second Floor: 591 971 Third Floor: 363 363 Fourth Floor: 198 198 Total 2175 2711 Exits Required: Basement: 2 IBC 1021.2 First Floor: 3 IBC 1021.2.4 Second Floor: 3 IBC 1021.2.4 Third Floor: 2 IBC 1021.2 Fourth Floor: 2 IBC 1021.2 Stairways: We don’t see any significant egress issues with this building as it currently exists for the code under which it was constructed, but when the addition is added, the existing stairways that discharge back into the building at the 1st level will become existing non-compliant stairs under the current code. (The 2012 IBC 1022.3 requires that a rated exit passageway extend from these Interior Exit Stairways to the exterior of the building). This will need to be recognized in the code compliance plan for the project, but might be able to be left as a non-compliant existing condition if you provide two new stairs from the addition to completely accommodate the new occupant load. (Note: The 2012 code is different than the 2009 code which would have allowed a certain percentage of stairs to discharge onto the first floor if the structure below was rated.) The revised plans only added a single new stair, so the non-compliant existing interior stair will still need to be addressed with the code official. The 2012 code has also clarified the distinction between enclosed rated stairs (Interior Exit Stairways) and open non-rated stairs (Interior Access Stairways). The code (IBC 1021.1) is very specific that the open stairs from the second floor to

19

the first are only acceptable for accommodating less than 50% of the required exits on the 2nd floor. Since there are 3 enclosed stairs and only 1 open stair from 2nd to 1st, the existing egress is compliant with this current code item, and the stairs easily handle the existing occupant load required width of 9.85 feet. With the proposed addition, the required egress width from the 2nd floor increased to There is no apparent access to the 3rd level roof, and when the second floor addition is created, there won’t be any existing way to access its roof either. Although there is no code requirement to have a firefighter stair access to either of these roofs, there is a mechanical equipment access requirement that will need to be addressed. (IMC 306.5) There appears to be an existing egress stair landing and door width deficiency at the convergence of the basement and 2nd floor per IBC 1005.6. There are only two stairs serving the basement (N134 & N101) they serve an occupant load of 394 from the 2nd floor (2/3 of 591) + 192 occupants from the basement for a total of 586, which requires an egress width of 117.2 inches (9.77 feet), yet there are only two 3 ft doors coming from these stairs. Adding more stairs to the 2nd floor addition would help reduce the occupant load coming down the existing stairs and could eliminate this non-compliant condition. The 1st floor appears to have adequate egress width to accommodate the existing 831 occupants (13.85 feet). The new auditorium occupant load is assumed to travel half to the exterior egress door and half to the 2nd floor corridor door, and its egress appears compliant, The following spaces require 2 exits or exit access doorways (IBC 1015.1): Lecture Rooms in excess of 49 Labs with an Occupant Load in excess of 49 Electrical Rooms with certain equipment configurations (per NEC 110.26) The new Study Lounge on the 1st floor, would typically be given an occupant load factor of 15, which would cause it to have an occupant load of 74, requiring a second means of egress. Travel Distance: 200 ft (B occup, non-sprinklered) per Table1016.2, This distance can increase to 300 ft in a fully sprinklered building. There do not appear to be any non-compliant conditions in the existing building. Common path of egress travel: 75 feet maximum per IBC 1014.3, this can increase to 100 ft in a fully sprinklered building. There do not appear to be any non-compliant conditions in the existing building. Separation of Exits: Building Exits OK by obvious observation

The separation of exits within the new computer lab is only compliant if the building is fully

sprinklered. IBC 1015.2.1 ex 2.

Aisles: 36 inches minimum B occupancies IBC 1017.3 We didn’t see any problems.

Corridors: The Corridors are required to be rated 1-hr with fire partition per IBC Table 1018.1, but the rating could be eliminated if the building is fully sprinklered.

Corridor width required is 44 inches minimum per IBC 1016.2 (exception 2) but we haven’t

looked closely if an occupant load in any given corridor exceeds 220 people, which would cause the width to be increased by 0.2”/occupant. [The 2012 IBC 1005.3.2 exception would allow the width factor to be 0.15”/ occupant if the building is fully sprinklered and has a voice feature in the FA system.]

A corridor dead end is being created on the 2nd level near the Neuro Lab. The length appears to

measure just over 50 feet. 50 feet is the maximum dead-end if the building is fully sprinklered, but is limited to 20 feet if it is not sprinklered. The addition of doors at the corridor could mitigate this issue.

20

Doors: 32 inches clear opening minimum required. IBC 1008.1.1 - We didn’t see any problems Exit width IBC 1005.1: Basement (.2) x 192 occupants = 3.20 ft required width - OK

First Floor (.2) x 987 occupants = 16.45 ft required width - OK Second Floor (.2) x 971 occupants = 16.18 ft required width – see below Third Floor (.2) x 363 occupants = 6.05 ft required width – OK Fourth Floor (.2) x 198 occupants = 3.30 ft required width - OK

The 2nd floor is OK if the Open Stair is counted as a required exit path. [The 2012 IBC 1005.3.2 exception would allow the width factor to be 0.15”/ occupant if the building is fully

sprinklered and has a voice feature in the FA system.] Accessible Means of Egress: Is not required in alterations to existing buildings per IBC 1007.1 [exception 1]. However, the 1st floor auditorium addition would require an accessible means of egress.

Areas of Refuge: Are required at or adjacent to enclosed stairs per IBC 1007.3. There are none currently. This will need to be addressed at any new stairs, and discussed with the AHJ to see if any existing stairs would need to be mitigated. If the building is fully sprinklered this requirement would be eliminated per IBC 1007.3 [exception 2] H. Plumbing Fixtures: IBC Table 2902.1

State Buildings Programs has adopted the IBC chapter 29 methodology of compliance. The IBC uses chapter 10 to determine the occupant load for the building.

The State Board of Plumber has adopted the IPC methodology of compliance. The A/E must also analyze the fixture requirements against the IPC and advise of concurrence for the following. [Any non-compliant items within this analysis must be resolved directly with the State Plumbing Board.]

A 50:50 Male/Female Ratio has been applied per IBC 2902.1.1

Existing: (B) 2175 occup. ( 1088 men & 1088 women)

Proposed (B) 2711 occup. ( 1356 men & 1356 women) We did not perform an on-site physical fixture count, the following information was derived from the as-built plans and must be confirmed on-site. The required quantities are based on the new proposed overall occupant load. In addition, it is unknown if any of the restrooms (or how many) may be HC accessible, this will need to be researched by the A/E team.

(B) Req’d Provided Men’s WC’sB(1:25 first 50, 1:50) 28 18 (OK with urinals) Men’s Lavs B(1:40 first 80, 1:80) 18 15 (3 SHORT) Urinals (may reduce WC by not more than 67%) NR 12 (OK) Women’s WC’s B(1:25 first 50, 1:50) 28 21 (7 SHORT)

21

Women’s Lavs B(1:40 first 80, 1:80) 18 15 (3 SHORT) Drinking Fountains B(1:100) 28 7 total (21 SHORT) Service Sinks B(1) 1 4 (OK) It appears that there is a shortfall in toilet room fixtures that will need to be mitigated with an addition project. There are two approaches that could be pursued, 1.) Only add enough fixtures to accommodate the newly added occupants and call the rest of building an existing non-compliant condition, or 2.) Add enough new fixtures to rectify the shortfall.

Per IBC 1109.2.1 Family or Assisted Use toilet facilities are not required in this building.

Family or Assisted Use toilet facilities may be used for compliance of the minimum fixture quantity where 2 of such toilet facilities are used. IBC 2902.2.1 (There appears to be 2 Unisex restrooms in the basement.

Per IBC 1109.2.2 ambulatory stalls are required in addition to the HC accessible stalls where the toilet/urinal count is six or greater in a restroom.

Project schedule, cost estimates and financing Schedule/phasing The project will be Design Build with estimated construction time of 20 months. Financing The College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences has been approved for $1,000,000 in funding from the University Facility Fee Advisory Board, and the remaining $22.3M will be financed by National Western Center COP funds. Cost estimate/methodology CSU standards specify that the A/E document 20% of the construction budget in bid alternates to cover potential volatility in the construction market as the project progresses.

Appendices a. Utility map b. Flood plain map c. AZ building current 1st and 2nd floor plans d. Site plan, floor plans and Renderings e. Alternate options floor plans f. Project budget g. Equipment list h. LEED checklist

22

Appendix A

C

LO

S

E

/

O

F

F

PHYSIOLOGY & BIOPHYSICS

143

ANATOMY/ZOOLOGY

141

BUILDING

ENVIRONMENTAL

HEALTH

Appendix B

Appendix C

Appendix D

A

EXISTING FIXTURE TO BE REPLACED

EXISTING FIXTURE IN ASBESTOS TILE-DO NOT DISTURB TILE

NEW FIXTURE-DO NOT REPLACE

LEGEND

014300109/18/1998 First Floor

Anatomy - Zoology Building

N124

W117K

W117J

014312/22/2003

ANATOMY-ZOOLOGY BUILDING

Third Floor

LEGENDEXISTING FIXTURE TO BE REPLACED

EXISTING FIXTURE IN ASBESTOS TILE-DO NOT DISTURB TILE

NEW FIXTURE-DO NOT REPLACE

A

Second Floor

ANATOMY-ZOOLOGY BUILDING

LEGENDEXISTING FIXTURE TO BE REPLACED

EXISTING FIXTURE IN ASBESTOS TILE-DO NOT DISTURB TILE

NEW FIXTURE-DO NOT REPLACE

A

01431/24/2004 0143002

E417AN 6B

AAE439 E438 N 4

E442E442E440E439E440 A E437E441

1N 8E400E446E444447E AE44512NE443

E402E406B 04EE403E405 N 11

E406E406A 411AC04E6 E

E426N 3E431 BE434N 1N 2E433 E432

E428E429E435E436E428A

E430 E426

N 412

N 7E419 E422EE427E427AE424 E4235N 13420421 EA426EE41724EN 10N 9

N 5E418E416E416414 A

411BE411 E E416BEE413

014309/ 18/ 98 0 143004F ourth FloorAN ATOM Y- ZO O LOG Y BU ILDIN G

LEG ENDE XISTING FIXTURE TO BE REPLACEDE XISTING FIXTURE IN ASBESTO S TILE-DO NO T DISTURB TILENEW FIXTURE-DO NO T REPLACEA

AA

A A

120 STATIONSUB

LL

MICROBIOLOGY

1" = 50'-0"1 SiteSITE

CHEMISTRY BIOLOGY

PROPOSEDADDITION

PAINTER

Future NWC Program Space

alt. first level this area

1

2

alt. recessed approachto loading dock

3

4

5

6

B C D E

alt. canopy this area

NW education walk - displayand student study area

C.1

7

A

FP

conf. office

1" = 20'-0"1 Level 11

--

-

-

A106

2

open to below

Future NWC Program Space

1

2

3

4

5

6

B C D E

alt. canopy this area

C.1

7

A

alt. second level elevatedexterior patio facing quad

1" = 20'-0"1 Level 2 2

--

-

-

neuro2850 nsf

A106

2

sinks (7)

cooler550 nsf

chem stg200 nsf

virtual anatomyteachig lab63-72 students2200 nsf

1

2

3

4

5

6

B C D E

option for ext wall atline three w/ virtuallab level 2

60' -

0"

C.1

50' - 0"

40' -

0"

7

A

renovate tobone room?200 nsf

bone room oropen study lounge

1" = 20'-0"1 Level 3 3

--

-

-

A106

2

ctcomm

lockers40 -1/2sizelockersea sinks (11)

cust

chem stg - 300 nsfover 1 story(e) below

1

2

27' - 0" 50' - 0"

20' -

0"

20' -

0"

20' -

0"

20' -

0"

20' -

0"

12' -

6"

clear span w/options

check capacity of (e)structure to take(n) floor d and l loadsthis area (450 sf) this floor only or splitand cantilever15' from 50' span

3

4

5

6

B C D E

40

40

C.1

7

A

4' - 4"7' - 2"4' - 0"7' - 2"4' - 0"7' - 2"4' - 0"7' - 2"5' - 0 1/2"

5' -

0 1/

2"

2' -

6"

7' -

0"

2' -

6"

7' -

0"

2' -

6"

7' -

0"

2' -

6"

7' -

0"

2' -

6"

7' -

0"

2' -

6"

7' -

0"

2' -

6"

7' -

0"

2' -

6"

5' -

10 1

/2"

cooler1100 nsf

44' -

9"

cust

gross 5,100 nsf

opt. for chem. stg and laundryin renovated space.

1" = 20'-0"1 Level 4 4

Level 10' - 0"

Level 213' - 6"

Level 327' - 0"

Level 440' - 6"

existing roof deck54' - 0"

1234567T.O. ELEV PP

68' - 0"

Level 10' - 0"

Level 213' - 6"

Level 327' - 0"

Level 440' - 6"

existing roof deck54' - 0"

B C D EC.1A

T.O. ELEV PP68' - 0"

1" = 20'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION

1" = 20'-0"2 SOUTH ELEVATION

Appendix E

Phase 1 and 2 alternate configuration (offices and restroom are not included in Phase 1 scope)

Appendix F

Page 1

Agency or Institution:

Project Title

Project Year(s):

Agency or Institution Priority Number:

Total Project CostsTotal Prior Year Appropriations

Current RequestFY 2016-17

Year 2 Request Year 3 Request Year 4 Request Year 5 Request

A. Land Acquisition

(1) Land /Building Acquisition -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ B. Professional Services

(1) Master Plan/PP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (2) Site Surveys, Investigations, Reports 80,000$ -$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (3) Architectural/Engineering/ Basic

Services 1,927,521$ -$ 1,927,521$ -$ -$ -$ -$

(4) Code Review/Inspection 345,000$ -$ 345,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (5) Construction Management 358,000$ -$ 358,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (6) Advertisements 2,000$ -$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$

(7a) Inflation for Professional Services -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (7b) Inflation Percentage Applied 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%(8) Other-commissioning 318,000$ -$ 318,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (9) Total Professional Services 3,030,521$ -$ 3,030,521$ -$ -$ -$ -$ C.

(1) Infrastructure -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (a) Service/Utilities 820,000$ -$ 820,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (b) Site Improvements 504,468$ -$ 504,468$ -$ -$ -$ -$

(2) Structure/Systems/ Components(a) New (GSF): 19,500-finished 10,850,000$ -$ 10,850,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ New $556.40/GSF(b) future NWC program GSF: 20,100 4,020,000$ -$ 4,020,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ core and shell $200/GSF

(3) Other (Specify) -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (4a) Inflation for Construction -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (4b) Inflation Percentage Applied 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%(5) Total Construction Costs 16,194,468$ -$ 16,194,468$ -$ -$ -$ -$ D.

(1) Equipment 1,023,266$ -$ 1,023,266$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (2) Furnishings 130,000$ -$ 130,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (3) Communications 1,388,649$ -$ 1,388,649$ -$ -$ -$ -$

(4a) Inflation on Equipment and Furnishings -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

'(4b) Inflation Percentage Applied 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%(5) Total Equipment and Furnishings Cost 2,541,915$ -$ 2,541,915$ -$ -$ -$ -$

E. Miscellaneous

(1) Art in Public Places=1% of State Total Construction Costs

223,000$ -$ 223,000$ -$ 223,000$

(2) COP Payments (under construction) -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (3) Relocation Costs -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ (4) Other Costs-signage -$ -$ -$ -$ (5) Total Misc. Costs 423,000$ -$ 423,000$ -$ 423,000$ F. Total Project Costs 22,189,904$ -$ 22,189,904$ -$ -$ -$ -$ G. Project Contingency

(1) 5% for New 1,110,096$ -$ 1,110,096$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (2) 10% for Renovation -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (3) Total Contingency 1,110,096$ -$ 1,110,096$ -$ -$ -$ -$ H. Total Budget Request [F+G(3)] 23,300,000$ -$ 23,300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$

I. Source of Funds

CCF-NWC COP 22,300,000$ -$ 22,300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ CF 1,000,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ RF -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FF -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Date

Date

Date 4/15/16

CC-C: CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION REQUEST FOR FY 2016-17

Construction or Improvement

Colorado State UniversitySignature

Department or Institution Approval:

Equipment and Furnishings

Revision? Yes No If yes, last submission date: __________

Name and e-mail address of preparer:

NWC Health and Education Outreach Center

1

SignatureCCHE Approval:

FY 2016 - 17Signature

OSPB Approval:

Appendix G

Health and Education Outreach Center equip 8/1/2015

EquipmentAnatomy/Neuro labsItem # required Total costAnatomage table 3 $208,180Dissection table 32 $163,200Folding table 55 $219,500stools/chairs $65,000lab dissection equip $20,000Computers/AV $216,146Total $892,026

Computer LabComputers/AV $97,710

DVMComputers/AV $33,530

Total Equipment budget $1,023,266

FurnitureComputer lab $50,000Locker rooms $10,000Study $40,000Total $100,000

Appendix H

LEED for New Construction v2.2Registered Project Checklist

Yes ? No Reason not attainable11 1 2 Sustainable Sites 14 Points

Y Prereq 1 Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Required1 Credit 1 Site Selection 11 Credit 2 Development Density & Community Connectivity 1

1 Credit 3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1 site does not qualify1 Credit 4.1 Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access 11 Credit 4.2 Alternative Transportation, Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms 11 Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation, Low-Emitting & Fuel-Efficient Vehicles 11 Credit 4.4 Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity 1

1 Credit 5.1 Site Development, Protect or Restore Habitat 11 Credit 5.2 Site Development, Maximize Open Space 11 Credit 6.1 Stormwater Design, Quantity Control 1

1 Credit 6.2 Stormwater Design, Quality Control 1 connected to city system1 Credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect, Non-Roof 11 Credit 7.2 Heat Island Effect, Roof 11 Credit 8 Light Pollution Reduction 1

Yes ? No

2 3 Water Efficiency 5 Points

1 Credit 1.1 Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50% 11 Credit 1.2 Water Efficient Landscaping, No Potable Use or No Irrigation 11 Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 1

1 Credit 3.1 Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction 11 Credit 3.2 Water Use Reduction, 30% Reduction 1

9 8 Energy & Atmosphere 17 Points

Y Prereq 1 Fundamental Commissioning of the Building Energy Systems RequiredY Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Performance RequiredY Prereq 3 Fundamental Refrigerant Management Required

4 6 Credit 1 Optimize Energy Performance 1 to 1010.5% New Buildings or 3.5% Existing Building Renovations 114% New Buildings or 7% Existing Building Renovations 217.5% New Buildings or 10.5% Existing Building Renovations 3

4 21% New Buildings or 14% Existing Building Renovations 424.5% New Buildings or 17.5% Existing Building Renovations 528% New Buildings or 21% Existing Building Renovations 631.5% New Buildings or 24.5% Existing Building Renovations 735% New Buildings or 28% Existing Building Renovations 838.5% New Buildings or 31.5% Existing Building Renovations 942% New Buildings or 35% Existing Building Renovations 10

1 2 Credit 2 On-Site Renewable Energy 1 to 31 2.5% Renewable Energy 1

7.5% Renewable Energy 2 12.5% Renewable Energy 3

1 Credit 3 Enhanced Commissioning 11 Credit 4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 11 Credit 5 Measurement & Verification 11 Credit 6 Green Power 1

continued…Yes ? No

6 1 6 Materials & Resources 13 Points

Y Prereq 1 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Required1 Credit 1.1 Building Reuse, Maintain 75% of Existing Walls, Floors & Roof 1 new bldg1 Credit 1.2 Building Reuse, Maintain 100% of Existing Walls, Floors & Roof 1 new bldg1 Credit 1.3 Building Reuse, Maintain 50% of Interior Non-Structural Elements 1 new bldg

1 Credit 2.1 Construction Waste Management, Divert 50% from Disposal 11 Credit 2.2 Construction Waste Management, Divert 75% from Disposal 1 new bldg1 Credit 3.1 Materials Reuse, 5% 1 new bldg1 Credit 3.2 Materials Reuse,10% 1 new bldg

1 Credit 4.1 Recycled Content, 10% (post-consumer + ½ pre-consumer) 11 Credit 4.2 Recycled Content, 20% (post-consumer + ½ pre-consumer) 1

1 Credit 5.1 Regional Materials, 10% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Region 11 Credit 5.2 Regional Materials, 20% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Region 11 Credit 6 Rapidly Renewable Materials 11 Credit 7 Certified Wood 1

Yes ? No

12 3 Indoor Environmental Quality 15 Points

Y Prereq 1 Minimum IAQ Performance RequiredY Prereq 2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Required1 Credit 1 Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring 1

1 Credit 2 Increased Ventilation 11 Credit 3.1 Construction IAQ Management Plan, During Construction 11 Credit 3.2 Construction IAQ Management Plan, Before Occupancy 11 Credit 4.1 Low-Emitting Materials, Adhesives & Sealants 11 Credit 4.2 Low-Emitting Materials, Paints & Coatings 11 Credit 4.3 Low-Emitting Materials, Carpet Systems 11 Credit 4.4 Low-Emitting Materials, Composite Wood & Agrifiber Products 1

1 Credit 5 Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control 11 Credit 6.1 Controllability of Systems, Lighting 11 Credit 6.2 Controllability of Systems, Thermal Comfort 11 Credit 7.1 Thermal Comfort, Design 11 Credit 7.2 Thermal Comfort, Verification 11 Credit 8.1 Daylight & Views, Daylight 75% of Spaces 1

1 Credit 8.2 Daylight & Views, Views for 90% of Spaces 1Yes ? No

1 4 Innovation & Design Process 5 Points

1 Credit 1.1 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title 11 Credit 1.2 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title 11 Credit 1.3 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title 11 Credit 1.4 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title 1

1 Credit 2 LEED® Accredited Professional 1Yes ? No

41 20 8 Project Totals (pre-certification estimates) 69 PointsCertified: 26-32 points, Silver: 33-38 points, Gold: 39-51 points, Platinum: 52-69 points

*Note for EAc1: All LEED for New Construction projects registered after June 26th, 2007 are required to achieve at least two (2) points under EAc1.

Project Name: Health Education Outreach Center Project Address: Colorado State University