NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS · NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS Fact sheets on best practice...

1

NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS Fact sheets on best practice tertiary sector EE/RES applications

2

DOCUMENT TITLE

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES applications

DOCUMENT TYPE

Deliverable D2.1 (WP2 – T2.1)

DATE

11/11/2015

AUTHORS

Chiara Wolter, Ambiente Italia

Guillaume de Laboulaye, ENERGIES 2050

CONTRIBUTORS

CREARA Consultores S.L. (ES), Ambiente Italia s.r.l (IT), Energetski Institut Hrvoje Požar (HR),

ENERGIES 2050 (FR), VivaPower-Selfenergy (PT), Technical University of Crete (GR).

EDITOR

Paolo Michele Sonvilla, CREARA Consultores

Achieving the European Union’s 2020 energy efficiency targets and at the same time reducing its

dependency on energy imports is a huge task that requires innovative approaches and tools – such

as the ones Trust EPC South wants to provide.

The Trust EPC South project aims to unleash the tertiary sector market potential for energy

efficiency investments in Southern Europe by developing a new investment assessment instrument

backed by an established building rating methodology (Green Rating™). Such instrument shall support

energy service companies (EPC providers and facilitators), financing institutions and tertiary market

actors thanks to the application of a standardised methodology to the investment assessment and

decision processes, ultimately allowing to reduce barriers to energy efficiency investments.

Trust EPC South, a project financed by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme, will pursue

its ambitious objectives in Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Croatia and Greece. The project

consortium, led by the Spanish firm CREARA, is composed by interdisciplinary experts representing the

participating countries and by the international non-profit organisation Green Rating Alliance. The

partners are united by the common intent to stimulate investments in the target markets, which are

offering great opportunities for energy efficiency as well as energy performance contracting.

PROJECT SUMMARY

3

LIST OF ACRONYMS

CCHP: Combined Cooling, Heating and Power:

DH: District Heating

DH&C: District Heating and Cooling

DHW: Domestic Hot Water

EE: Energy efficiency

ESCO: Energy Service Company

EPC: Energy Performance Contract

FEDENE: Fédération des Services Énergie Environnement

H&C: Heating and Cooling

HVAC: Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning

IPMVP: International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol

IRR: Internal Rate of Return

LED: Light Emitting Diode

PV: Photovoltaic

RES: Renewable Energy Source

ROI: Return on Investment

ST: Solar Thermal Systems

TPF: Third Party Financing

4

Within the scope of Trust EPC south, the project consortium is conducting a thorough market analysis in

the six southern European participating countries. This analysis includes an advanced state of the art of

sustainable energy solutions for the tertiary sector and the characterisation of the corresponding tertiary

sector segments, the assessment of market barriers as well as the presentation of available financing

solutions. It also includes the evaluation of the most promising sustainable energy projects or “best

practices”, which are presented in this report.

These best practices will be used to generate standardised sustainable energy project technical

functional models that will be later used to develop the Green Rating™ - based investment assessment

tool, one of the main products of this initiative. The 33 factsheets presented in this report show which

are the most common solutions used and outline how they are being implemented, how they are

financed and what are the other conditions for success.

The chosen best practices cover six main tertiary sector segments: Retail, Health, Hospitality, Offices,

Sports Centres and Education. Since the purpose of selecting best practices is mainly to highlight the

most promising sustainable energy solutions, and due to the challenging EPC market conditions in the

participating countries, not all of the projects chosen involve EPC contracts, but also other more

traditional arrangements such as energy supply contracts.

They also cover a wide range of measures, from boilers’ replacement to optimisation of energy

management systems, energy monitoring tools, and the installation of renewable energy sources. The

interventions on the building envelope are less represented due to their long investment recovery times.

For each factsheet, a set of over 20 indicators is provided, divided into four areas:

Introductory information including segment of activity and stakeholders involved;

The project’s context, where the facility and initial situation/energy use are described;

Specifications of the contract: including duration, planned savings, contractual details, financing

arrangements and results;

Additional comments have also been added when relevant to further detail the project and its

specificities (elements for success, advantages for the clients, etc.).

The choice of the indicators has been made to create synergies with existing initiatives such as

TRANSPARENSE and EESI2020, but also to give a comprehensive overview and thus reinforce our

analysis on potential EE and RES applications in tertiary sectors. One important criteria used in the

selection of the best practice cases is their replicability, as one aim of our work is to stimulate the

development of further implementations.

INTRODUCTION

5

OVERVIEW OF BEST PRACTICES

Code Tertiary Segment Client Summary - main fields of action

ES1 Retail CC parque sur de Madrid Efficient Lighting and HVAC systems

ES2 Health Hospital La Paz Various EE measures

ES3 Hospitality Confidential More efficient thermal power

ES4 Education Confidential Efficient lighting and HVAC systems

ES5 Retail Berriak Monitoring, efficient lighting and others

ES6 Health Hospital Virgen de la Poveda

Efficient lighting, monitoring, heat pumps, building insulation

ES7 Offices Stratenergy Optimal energy use, efficient lighting, insulation, heat pumps

FR1 Hospitality Groupe Accor Boiler replacement, hot water exchanger, Building Management System, buffer for iced water

FR2 Retail Carrefour Refrigeration systems, closer management, remote monitoring, training and awareness raising

FR3 Retail Logidis Comptoirs Modernes Evaporators' fans, Refrigerating systems

FR4 Education Sup'Elec and CESAL Heating system management, efficient lighting, rescheduling

FR5 Retail Ubinail Rodamco Regulation of heat pumps, Management of roof top, Ventilation and lighting

FR6 Health Clinic of Saint Priest - Private hospital of Lyon East

Building Management System, boiler, awareness raising

FR7 Health CHU Toulouse - Energy pole PURPAN

Raising awareness, Set point temperatures regulation, ventilation, management of pumps' speed, biomass heaters and heat recovery

GR1 Offices KG Law Firm Efficient lighting, monitoring and energy management, boilers, insulation, heat exchanger for hot water

GR2 Hospitality Mistral Hotel Automatic controls, monitoring and management

GR3 Hospitality Hotel Solar protection, efficient lighting, automatic controls, monitoring and management, PVs, ST, heat pumps

GR4 Health Mpodosakeio Hospital Efficient Lighting

GR5 Offices Administration of Western Macedonia

Efficient Lighting

6

HR1 Hospitality Adriainvest Inženjering Solar collectors, Heat recovery, PV systems, building management system

HR2 Offices Crosco Low temperature hot water boilers feed with natural gas

IT1 Retail Conad del Tirreno Efficient refrigeration, lighting, air conditioning, management; structural revamping, internal layout.

IT2 Sport Center Palasport Treviglio Review of lighting system

IT3 Hospitality Confidential Building insulation, solar protection and PV plant

IT4 Sport Center Confidential Centralised heat generation, heat recovery, metering devices, lighting

IT5 Offices/Hospitality Confidential Thermal insulation, windows replacement, lighting, PV plant

PT1 Hospitality Confidential Various EE measures

PT2 Hospitality Confidential PV generation plant

PT3 Health Long-term Care Facilities PV generation plant

PT4 Health Retirement Home and Day Care Center

PV plant, solar thermal panels, biomass boilers, heat pumps, pipe insulation, efficient lighting, monitoring

PT5 Sport Center Indoor swimming pool Pipe insulation, lighting, isothermal pool cover, solar thermal, monitoring

PT6 Retail Hypermarket Lighting

PT7 Health Confidential Biomass boiler and lighting

7

BP1 CC PARQUE SUR DE MADRID ES1

1. Introduction

Name of client CC Parquesur de Madrid (Shopping Center)

Segment of activity Retail

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC project

Service provider / facilitator Efirenova

Location and climatic region Madrid (Mediterranean / Continental climate)

Other operators involved N.A.

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Shopping Center

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 Building: 151,200 m2

Age of buildings Opened in 1989

Description of the initial situation Large building with high level of consumption with old and inefficient equipment for H&C

Main energy use Heating & Cooling

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Confidential

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner EE measures for individual areas and DH for the whole centre

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 15 N.A.

Sustainable Energy measures implemented

- Implementation of efficiency measures for HVAC - Design and implementation of high efficiency HVAC with CCHP and DH&C - Implementation of energy efficiency measures for individual stores (e.g. LED lighting)

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 20 %

Corresponding financial savings Confidential

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 196 t

Cost of investment 7.5 M€

Payback period (estimated or real) Confidential

Particular safeguards conditions Full warranty and maintenance

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP Protocol

Financed provided by (100 % ESCO, mix?) 100 % provided by a third party (Bank)

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients DH&C implementation (CCHP system)

Best Practice criteria assessment Representative contract in the private sector with duration of 15 years. Financed by a third party

General comments Energy savings obtained reached 44 %

8

BP2 HOPITAL LA PAZ ES2

1. Introduction

Name of client Hospital ''La Paz''

Segment of activity Health

Type of contract (EPC/other) EE project (turnkey and energy supply contract)

Service provider / facilitator Dalkia


Other operators involved Gas Natural Servicios (energy provider for the duration of contract)


Type of building Hospital

Number of buildings and surface in m² 17 buildings and 4 large hospitals; approximately 180,000 m2

Age of buildings Built in 1964

Description of the initial situation Thermal installation providing hot water and heating for all the facilities working for more than 40 years

Main energy use H&C



Describe the objective of the building owner Energy efficiency and savings

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 15 2015


New H&C installation: - Natural gas thermal power station - Natural gas supply - Improvement of facilities (insulation, lighting and others)


Corresponding financial savings Total of 9 M€ savings

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Confidential

Cost of investment 36.2 M€




Financed provided by (100 % ESCO, mix?) Dalkia and Gas Natural Servicios


Innovations and advantages for the clients New installation and immediate savings without financing the project

Best Practice criteria assessment Large EE project for a very important hospital of Spain that offers EE measures and energy supply with maintenance and warranty of equipment

General comments This project could lead to several more in health sector

9

BP3 HOTEL ES3

1. Introduction

Name of client Hotel (the client’s name is confidential)

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator EE Project

Location and climatic region Confidential



Type of building Hotel

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 Building

Age of buildings Confidential

Description of the initial situation Thermal installation using diesel oil as energy source

Main energy use Diesel



Describe the objective of the building owner Replace the installation and reduce energy costs

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 10 Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Replacement of equipment: -High efficiency heat pumps -Implementation of pilot monitoring & control system

Energy savings guaranteed by contract Financial savings were guaranteed but not the energy savings

Corresponding financial savings 40 %


Cost of investment Confidential

Payback period (estimated or real) 7 years



Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) EPC provider


Innovations and advantages for the clients Specialized software establishing set points according to the meteorological conditions in the area helping save more energy

Best Practice criteria assessment Pilot project of high efficiency equipment with new type of monitoring and control system

General comments

10

BP4 SCHOOL ES4

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity School

Type of contract (EPC/other) EE project (turnkey solution)

Service provider / facilitator Gese Servicios Energéticos

Location and climatic region Confidential



Type of building School

Number of buildings and surface in m² Mid-size school with primary education and high school


Description of the initial situation Old H&C and DHW systems, optimization needed for lighting

Main energy use Electricity

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 700.46 kWh/day (not per m2)


Describe the objective of the building owner Energy efficiency and savings

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year Confidential Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Main implemented measures: - Optimization of lighting system - Management of heating and cooling and DHW

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 27 % (economically)

Corresponding financial savings ~10 k€ /year Daily consumption before: 96.86 €/day and after: 44.06 €/day 57 % savings on energy consumption

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) NA







Innovations and advantages for the clients New installation and immediate savings without having to fund the project

Best Practice criteria assessment Small EPC project that promotes EE in the education sector and increases customer’s trust. Strong savings above contractual engagements

General comments

11

BP5 BERRIAK ES5

1. Introduction

Name of client Berriak

Segment of activity Retail


Service provider / facilitator Gese Servicios Energéticos

Location and climatic region Basque Country (Oceanic climate)

Other operators involved Dexma energy management (management solution)


Type of building Supermarket

Number of buildings and surface in m² 4 supermarkets in different locations


Description of the initial situation Berriak supermarkets wanted to promote energy efficiency to reduce their energy consumption and in the meantime their environmental impact, without disrupting their customers comfort and well being


Energy use per m² before EPC (if available)

335 k€/year (each supermarket)


Describe the objective of the building owner

Energy efficiency and savings



- Monitoring for refrigeration equipment - Lighting system optimization - Energy management system implementation

Energy savings guaranteed by contract Confidential


CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 34 t/year

Cost of investment 10 k€/supermarket

Payback period (estimated or real) 6 months

Particular safeguards conditions Confidential

Achieved savings (if already implemented) 20.3 k€ in savings obtained the first year

Details on monitoring and assessment Dexma energy management monitoring solution



Innovations and advantages for the clients Monitoring for their food conservation equipment

Best Practice criteria assessment Replicability and scalability of the solution; project developed in 4 different facilities with a single contract

General comments

12

BP6 HOSPITAL VIRGEN DE LA POVEDA ES6

1. Introduction

Name of client Hospital ‘Virgen de la Poveda’



Service provider / facilitator Creara





Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 Building: 20,000 m2


Description of the initial situation Low efficiency equipment and diesel heating system

Main energy use Heating (41 %)

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 3,643 TWh (total)


Describe the objective of the building owner Renovation of facilities

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 4+2 (contract fixed for 4 years and could be extended for 2 additional years)

2014


Main measures implemented: - Led lighting - Monitoring & control - High efficiency heat pumps - Building insulation improvement


Corresponding financial savings 30 %, 102 k€/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) N.A.

Cost of investment 270 k€ + VAT

Payback period (estimated or real) 2.4 years

Particular safeguards conditions Full warranty, no maintenance


Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) EPC Provider (which obtained financing through a leasing from a Bank)


Innovations and advantages for the clients Renovation of equipment and facilities

Best Practice criteria assessment Innovative and replicable pilot. The successful development of this project will lead to several more

General comments

13

BP7 STRATENERGY ES7

1. Introduction

Name of client Stratenergy

Segment of activity Offices

Type of contract (EPC/other) EE project

Service provider / facilitator Creara

Location and climatic region Basque Country (Oceanic climate)

Other operators involved N.A


Type of building Office

Number of buildings and surface in m² 5 buildings: 1 for offices, 1 laboratory and 3 for industrial process


Description of the initial situation High consumption facilities


Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 7.4 TWh/year (3.8 TWh excluding industry)


Describe the objective of the building owner Optimization of energy consumption

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 7 years 2015


Some of the measures implemented: - Optimization and control system - LED Lighting - Insulation improvement - Heat pumps installation




Cost of investment 500 k€


Particular safeguards conditions Full warranty, no maintenance

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP protocol

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Customer


Innovations and advantages for the clients Guaranteed savings; EE measures for whole facilities

Best Practice criteria assessment Important project for office, laboratory and industrial facilities in one single contract

General comments

14

BP8 ACCOR FR1

1. Introduction

Name of client Groupe Accor



Service provider / facilitator Siemens Building Technologies

Location and climatic region Paris (Temperate)

Other operators involved None



Number of buildings and surface in m² Hotel Sofitel Paris Arc de triomphe

Age of buildings Over 30 y

Description of the initial situation Hotel 125 rooms with boiler 1.5 MW and a refrigeration group of 441 kW

Main energy use Heating

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.


Describe the objective of the building owner Pilot project to reduce energy consumption especially linked to heating


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Boiler replacement, Installation of a hot water exchanger, Building Management System, Installation of a tarpaulin buffer for iced water to reduce groups' uses in peak hours


Corresponding financial savings 40,000 €/y


Cost of investment 175,000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4.5

Particular safeguards conditions -

Details on monitoring and assessment Control and analysis of consumption; Regular energy reports; Partnership with ESCO; Training and support

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % Siemens (ESCO)


Innovations and advantages for the clients Could carried out work without the need for investments

Best Practice criteria assessment

Good practice but not followed up because: - Accor Group is more interested in investing itself in EE - lack of visibility over energy use after the end of the contract - issues with monitoring, unable to see if savings were clearly coming from the measures implemented

General comments source: http://www.urbanisme-puca.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/emergence-contrats-performance-energetique-marche-francais.pdf

15

BP9 CARREFOUR FR2

1. Introduction

Name of client Carrefour

Segment of activity Commerce


Service provider / facilitator Schneider electric

Location and climatic region France (Temperate, Mediterranean and oceanic)



Type of building Commercial centres

Number of buildings and surface in m² 16 buildings for a total of minimum 162,827 m²

Age of buildings Various

Description of the initial situation Carrefour aimed at improving the energy efficiency of its commercial centres, the mechanisms for monitoring energy consumption were especially deficient

Main energy use Mainly gas (Heating)



Describe the objective of the building owner Carrefour aimed at improving the way energy is managed. They wanted a ROI of 3y maximum and asked Schneider Elec. To launch a process of audits and recommendations for each building


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Optimization and reconfiguration of systems for refrigeration, Energy Management, Installation of a remote monitoring system, Training and involvement of Carrefour's staff




Cost of investment Based on energy saving and PB period: probably between 1.5 and 2 M€

Payback period (estimated or real) 2.5

Achieved savings (if already implemented) 14 % achieved

Particular safeguards conditions Bonus or malus (penalties) are subject to a global balance each year

Details on monitoring and assessment Remote monitoring system, follow-up with Carrefour's staff

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % Carrefour


Innovations and advantages for the clients Schneider carried on everything and the ROI was quite short

Best Practice criteria assessment Savings above guarantees

General comments Source: Ortega (2011), Carrefour et Schneider

16

BP10 LOGIDIS COMPTOIRS MODERNES FR3

1. Introduction

Name of client Logidis Comptoirs Modernes

Segment of activity Commerce


Service provider / facilitator Schneider electric

Location and climatic region Le Mans (Temperate)



Type of building Logistic platform, Offices, Storages

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 dry storage 51,000 m², 1 cold storage 14,000 m² Offices 2,500 m²

Age of buildings N.A.

Description of the initial situation LCM is part of Carrefour, which has developed projects with Schneider Electric. LCM wanted to sign an EPC to develop energy efficiency of its platform in Le Mans.

Main energy use Energy use at 50 % for Refrigeration. Total energy use 9 GWh



Describe the objective of the building owner The client wanted a solution to reduce its energy bills, while keeping its installations working, producing a refrigeration of quality and easing maintenance

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 3 N.A.


Optimized management of evaporators' fans Optimization of management and regulation of the 2 main refrigerating systems + installation of speed regulator Installation of High Floating Pressure

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 18% including 36% on refrigeration systems

Corresponding financial savings N.A.



Payback period (estimated or real) Inferior to 2 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) Not communicated

Particular safeguards conditions Bonus malus depending on performances

Details on monitoring and assessment Classic monitoring approach – IPMVP, trimestral analysis of results

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) N.A.


Innovations and advantages for the clients Could carried on its own activities, rapid ROI (2y)

Best Practice criteria assessment Good practice with an integrated approach to EE in logistic platforms and Offices

General comments Private contract, Source Schneider, Ortega (2011)

17

BP11 SUP’ELEC/CESAL FR4

1. Introduction

Name of client Sup'Elec and CESAL

Segment of activity Education


Service provider / facilitator Schneider electric, EDF

Location and climatic region Gyf sur Yvette (Temperate)



Type of building School premises and students' housing

Number of buildings and surface in m² 60,000 m². The campus is made of 3 sites including one which is older than 30 y.

Age of buildings Over 30 years

Description of the initial situation

Sup'Elec school and CESAL manage the students’ campus. They aimed to modernize buildings and offer greater comfort to users, reduce costs, and minimize environmental impacts. Buildings were becoming old and a comprehensive new strategy regarding energy management was necessary. They could not invest without guarantees on savings.

Main energy use Heating and lighting



Describe the objective of the building owner Improve the users' comfort, upgrade the installations to current standards, promote exemplarity and sustainable management


Sustainable Energy measures implemented New heating system management, Replacement of luminaires, Optimization of external lighting, Integration of practical constraints and specific schedule of the school in the design of solutions

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 15 % per year

Corresponding financial savings 100,000 € HT per year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 100 t/year

Cost of investment 1 M€


Achieved savings (if already implemented) Performances guaranteed by Schneider and EDF

Particular safeguards conditions Guaranteed performances

Details on monitoring and assessment Global monitoring and awareness raising campaign provided by Schneider and EDF, Monitoring and reporting of performances, Training of staffs

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Confidential


Innovations and advantages for the clients Could carried on its own activities, ROI 7 y

Best Practice criteria assessment Performance are guaranteed and despite high investment, the payback period was short

General comments Private contract. Source EDF, Schneider, FEDENE, Ortega (2011)

18

BP12 UBINAIL RODAMCO FR5

1. Introduction

Name of client Ubinai Rodamco

Segment of activity Real estate - Commercial centers



Location and climatic region Near Melun (Temperate)



Type of building Commercial centers

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 commercial centre, more than 50.000 m²


Description of the initial situation Commercial centre with need for improvement in energy efficiency

Main energy use Cooling, heating, lighting



Describe the objective of the building owner Reduced energy use


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Regulation of heat pumps' differential pressure; Better management of roof top; Hourly programming for fresh air Automatic lighting system in technical corridors

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 5 % for electricity and 10 % for gas

Corresponding financial savings After a year: 60,000 € in electricity (17 %) and 12,000 € in gas (25 %)



Payback period (estimated or real) Less than 3 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) 17 % in electricity, 25 % for gas

Particular safeguards conditions Performances guaranteed by contract

Details on monitoring and assessment Dalkia is in charge of the site exploitation

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % Dalkia


Innovations and advantages for the clients Short Payback period, no investment needed

Best Practice criteria assessment Savings above guarantees, funding from ESCO, possibilities to extend

General comments Private contract, source: Ortega (2011), Ubinail Rodamco sust. Dev. Report 2008

19

BP13 CLINIC ST PRIEST FR6

1. Introduction

Name of client Clinic of Saint Priest - Private hospital of Lyon East




Location and climatic region France (Temperate)



Type of building Clinic

Number of buildings and surface in m² 12,000 m², 189 beds and places for patients


Description of the initial situation Need for energy efficiency improvement in the clinic

Main energy use Gas heating

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Gas consumption: 4,055 MWh pcs/y Electricity consumption: 2,641 MWh/year


Describe the objective of the building owner Reduce energy use



Optimized energy use: Building Management System was reprogrammed, 3 way-valve installed upstream the boiler Raise awareness of staff towards sustainable behaviours Realization of a guide presenting environmental good practices


Corresponding financial savings N.A.



Payback period (estimated or real) N.A.

Achieved savings (if already implemented) On-going project

Particular safeguards conditions N.A.

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP protocol

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) N.A.


Innovations and advantages for the clients Reduced energy use and increased comfort for patients

Best Practice criteria assessment Example of good practice in a clinic

General comments Private contract, source: FEDENE

20

BP14 CHU TOULOUSE FR7

1. Introduction

Name of client CHU Toulouse - Energy pole PURPAN




Location and climatic region France (Mediterranean and oceanic)




Number of buildings and surface in m² 4 Health related buildings – 73,000 m² 1 building for logistic (technical rooms, offices and kitchen) – 5,300 m² Housing building – 1,500 m²


Description of the initial situation Goal of the EPC was to reduce energy use in all premises


Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 17,190 MWh/y for heating 6,410 MWh/y for cooling and refrigeration


Describe the objective of the building owner Reduce global energy use



Raising awareness of users Adjustment of heating and cooling set point temperature Hourly programming of offices and common blocs' ventilation, Electronic variation of pumps' speed, Biomass heaters, Heat recovery, Etc.


Corresponding financial savings Confidential.

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 80 % (5,300 t/y)

Cost of investment N.A.

Payback period (estimated or real) N.A.

Achieved savings (if already implemented) The contract is still recent

Particular safeguards conditions Partnership contract

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP Protocol opt C

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) -


Innovations and advantages for the clients Regular savings on the long term

Best Practice criteria assessment Long term contract, systemic approach to energy, high reduction in GHGs thanks to RE

General comments Private contract, source: FEDENE, CHU Toulouse

21

BP15 KG LAW FIRM GR1

1. Introduction

Name of client KG Law Firm

Segment of activity Office


Service provider / facilitator COFELY GDF SUEZ

Location and climatic region Mediterranean




Number of buildings and surface in m² 3 buildings 850 m2

Age of buildings 9 Years

Description of the initial situation High-energy consumption basically associated with the HVAC systems. There was a need to implement energy efficiency improvements, but no funds were available.

Main energy use Main energy use was electricity associated with air conditioning

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 590 kWh/(m²y)

N.A3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Energy cost reduction, Awareness about environmental issues


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Efficient lighting, Monitoring and energy management systems, Boilers, Compensation systems, Insulation of boilers and hot water piping, Heat exchanger for hot water

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 18.44 kWh/m²/year

Corresponding financial savings 16 % - 10,000 €

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 9.000 Kg



Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Particular safeguards conditions Maintenance contract for 5 years.

Details on monitoring and assessment

The building’s baseline consumption was created through a five-year collection of bills, and by software the energy consumption has been allocated on each of the energy demands (heating, cooling etc.). Counters were placed in order to record the daily, monthly and annual consumption; comparing those levels to the baseline they could calculate the energy savings achieved.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % ESCO


Innovations and advantages for the clients Reduced energy use and increased comfort

Best Practice criteria assessment The financing savings per year (16 %) and the low payback period (2.5 years) make this EPC a good practice.

General comments Private contract

22

BP16 MISTRAL HOTEL GR2

1. Introduction

Name of client Mistral Hotel



Service provider / facilitator Α&Β Energy





Number of buildings and surface in m² 8,800

Age of buildings 25


The main consideration was related to the settings associated with the cooling, heating and hot water production systems, leading to high-energy consumption. There was a need to implement efficiency improvements, but no funds were available and experts should operate and monitor the facilities.

Main energy use Electricity for cooling and lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 112.5 kWh/m²/year


Describe the objective of the building owner Energy cost reduction, Environmental policy of the company Awareness about environmental issues


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Automatic controls, Monitoring and energy management systems

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 54.000 kWh/year

Corresponding financial savings 8.5 % 7,400 €




Particular safeguards conditions Proof with statistical analysis for the energy saving amount

Details on monitoring and assessment

A network, of automatic control systems and energy meters was placed on the boiler room and the hot water production system allowing the ESCO to perform tele-monitoring on the facility and prevent matters associated with maintenance and energy wasting. The energy savings were calculated with the IPMVP.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Mix


Innovations and advantages for the clients Reduced energy use

Best Practice criteria assessment The financing savings per year (8.5 %) and the low payback period (2 years) make this case a good practice.


23

BP17 HOTEL GR3

1. Introduction


Segment of activity Hotel


Service provider / facilitator ETVA VIPE





Number of buildings and surface in m² 600


Description of the initial situation The main problem had to do with the set-points, associated with the cooling, heating and hot water production systems, leading to high-energy consumption


Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 240 kWh/m²/year


Describe the objective of the building owner Energy cost reduction


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Shading, Efficient lighting, Automatic controls, monitoring and energy management systems, Boilers, Compensation systems, PVs for electricity, Solar collectors for Hot Water, Heat pumps

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 48 kWh/m²/year

Corresponding financial savings 21 %, 12.000 €




Particular safeguards conditions Letter of guarantee, pledging of equipment, Payment upon completion of the billing period, Equipment warranty, 24 hours troubleshooting warranty

Details on monitoring and assessment Control and regular analysis of consumption



Innovations and advantages for the clients Reduced energy use and increased comfort for clients

Best Practice criteria assessment The level of financing savings per year (21 %) and the low payback period (6.1 years) make this case a good practice


24

BP18 MPODOSAKEIO HOSPITAL GR4

1. Introduction

Name of client Mpodosakeio Hospital



Service provider / facilitator ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES Co. (Energeiakes Technologies)


Other operators involved Regional Development Agency of Western Macedonia (ANKO) SA



Number of buildings and surface in m² 20,000 m²

Age of buildings 14 years

Description of the initial situation High level of electricity consumed for lighting. Old technology fluorescent lamps operating 24/7 had to be replaced.

Main energy use Electricity for cooling and lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 369.1 kWh/m²



EPC contract with Third-Party Financing during the implementation of Pilot Action 2.1: "Mechanisms of Third Party Financing - TPF" of the MARIE project with the participation of Regional Development Agency of Western Macedonia (ANKO) SA


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Replacing 60 old technology fluorescent lamps Τ8 58W with 60 LED lamps 31W (Master LED tube, PERF 1500mm 31W/865 T8)

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 16,293.60 kWh/year

Corresponding financial savings 2,085.60 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 4,200 kg



Particular safeguards conditions

Client is responsible for the good operational conditions of lighting bulbs and the facility. ESCO is responsible for the replacement and repairing of any problematic bulb or malfunction. In case of not achieving the goals for energy consumption while there is good operation of the lights the ESCO has to bear the cost.

Details on monitoring and assessment Benchmarking was used to calculate and measure the energy savings achieved. Luminance and electrical power were measured before and after the EE applications

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) TPF



Best Practice criteria assessment This contract is one of the 2 first contracts signed in Greece, created to be an example of best practices

General comments Private contract. The contract had reached the final stage but no signatures had been signed.

25

BP19 ADMINISTRATION OF WESTERN MACEDONIA GR5

1. Introduction

Name of client Administration of Western Macedonia

Segment of activity Public Offices


Service provider / facilitator ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES Co. (Energeiakes Technologies)


Other operators involved Regional Development Agency of Western Macedonia (ANKO) SA





Description of the initial situation High energy consumption related to 14 high-pressure lamps with Na bulbs that were used for outdoor lighting. Significant energy saving could be achieved by replacing them with Power LED lighting type.

Main energy use Electricity for lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 164.2 kWh/m²



EPC contract with Third-Party Financing during the implementation of Pilot Action 2.1: "Mechanisms of Third Party Financing - TPF" of the MARIE project with the participation of Regional Development Agency of Western Macedonia (ANKO) SA


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Replacing lighting the perimeter of the building 14 High Pressure lamps with Na bulbs 250W replaced with Power LED type “700mA, 4000Κ Power 110W –13720lm, Disano / 3282 Rolle T3”

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 8,623.81 kWh/year

Corresponding financial savings 1,136.20 €

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 3,550 kg CO2



Particular safeguards conditions

The client is responsible for the good operational conditions of the lighting bulbs and the facility. ESCO is responsible for the replacement and repairing of any problematic bulb or malfunction. In case of not achieving the goals for energy consumption while there is good operation of the lights, the ESCO has to bear the cost.

Details on monitoring and assessment Benchmarking was used to calculate and measure the energy savings achieved. Luminance and electrical power were measured before and after the EE applications

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) TPF



Best Practice criteria assessment This contract is one of the 2 first contracts signed in Greece, created to be an example of best practices

General comments Private contract. The contract had reached the final stage but no signatures had been signed.

26

BP20 ADRIAINVEST INŽENJERING HR1

1. Introduction

Name of client Adriainvest Inženjering

Segment of activity Hotel - Hospitality

Type of contract (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator HEP ESCO

Location and climatic region Biograd na moru (Mediterranean)




Number of buildings and surface in m² N.A.


Description of the initial situation Adria Hotel has 208 modern equipped rooms. All rooms are air-conditioned and have a balcony, shower, toilet, mini-bar, telephone, and satellite TV. Fuel oil is used for DHW and heating.

Main energy use Cooling and DHW



Describe the objective of the building owner Project to reduce energy consumption especially linked to DHW



Solar collectors for domestic hot water preparation Hot water tanks (2 x 6,500 l) Heat recovery from existing chiller for DHW Installation of photovoltaic system 30 kW Building Management System

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 75 % of Fuel oil consumption (30,000 l) 36,000 kWh of electricity produced

Corresponding financial savings 44,760 EUR/y

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 78.6 t


Payback period (estimated or real) 6

Particular safeguards conditions Client is responsible for the good operational conditions of the installed equipment.

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP is used



Innovations and advantages for the clients Short payback period, no initial investment

Best Practice criteria assessment Integrated approach to EE including installation of RES

General comments One of the few ESCO projects in tertiary sector in Croatia

27

BP21 CROSCO HR2

1. Introduction

Name of client Crosco

Segment of activity Offices


Service provider / facilitator HEP ESCO

Location and climatic region Zagreb (Continental)






Description of the initial situation Fuel oil is used for DHW and heating.




Describe the objective of the building owner Project to reduce energy consumption especially linked to heating


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Low temperature hot water boilers (2 x 575 kW) on natural gas

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 140,000 kWh




Payback period (estimated or real) 4

Particular safeguards conditions Client is responsible for the good operational conditions of the installed equipment.

Details on monitoring and assessment Modified IPMVP is used



Innovations and advantages for the clients Short payback period, no investment

Best Practice criteria assessment High financial and energy savings

General comments One of the few ESCO projects in tertiary sector in Croatia

28

BP22 CONAD DEL TIRRENO IT1

1. Introduction

Name of client CONAD del Tirreno

Segment of activity Retail - Supermarket stores


Service provider / facilitator 3EPC


Other operators involved Unicredit (financing institution)


Type of building Supermarkets - retail stores for large scale distribution: measures on several buildings with different location

Number of buildings and surface in m² 18 buildings, with an average of 1,000 m2 for about 20,000 m

2

Age of buildings 15 years on average

Description of the initial situation The buildings needed a deep renovation, involving the refurbishment of the building and the requalification of the plants, in particular the refrigeration equipment.

Main energy use Heating, cooling and lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Between 600 and 1,200 kWh/m2


Describe the objective of the building owner Energy cost reduction, awareness toward environmental issues



Revamping of freezing equipment; Installation of low dispersion refrigerated bars; LED illumination; Revamping of air conditioning systems; Advanced Energy Management Service for Energy Efficiency Certifications; Structural revamping; Renewed internal layout.

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 35 ~ 50 % in energy consumption per year Performance guarantee specifically tailored for each single store

Corresponding financial savings 35 ~ 50 % in energy bill per year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Average of 50 ~ 150 t CO2 per year

Cost of investment 33 M€

Payback period (estimated or real) 3 ~ 7 years estimated on technological/structural interventions

Achieved savings (if already implemented) Just implemented

Particular safeguards conditions Special privilege, accounts pledge, transfer of VAT credit

Details on monitoring and assessment Implementation of the system Mætrics® Advanced to enhance energy management: consumption monitoring, system controls, alert and ticketing for maintenance, waste quantification;

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Project finance (Unicredit)


Innovations and advantages for the clients The realization of the intervention in project financing has enabled the possibility of a deeper renovation, involving energy efficiency and space refurbishment

Best Practice criteria assessment Best practice innovation: combination of a guaranteed savings and a Project Finance structure. Replicability.


29

BP23 PALASPORT TREVIGLIO IT2

1. Introduction

Name of client Palasport Treviglio

Segment of activity Sport Centres


Service provider / facilitator Nesco srl




Type of building Sport hall

Number of buildings and surface in m² Around 2,000 m2

Age of buildings 15 years


- High and frequent voltage fluctuations - Continuous generation of harmonics with big impact on all electronic devices - Unbalanced star point - Rephasing needed

Main energy use Lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 113 MWh/y (for lighting purposes)


Describe the objective of the building owner Increase the efficiency of the plant

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 5 years N.A.

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Review and optimisation of the lighting system, based on harmonics filtering, rephasing and balancing of the system



CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 24 %


Payback period (estimated or real) 3.5 years estimated


Particular safeguards conditions Client is responsible for the operational conditions, which have to be

maintained above a contractual limit

Details on monitoring and assessment The performance of the plant is continuously controlled by remote



Innovations and advantages for the clients No initial investment needed, a part of shared savings from the beginning of the contract

Best Practice criteria assessment Short duration of the contract by a guaranteed saving of 22 % on the baseline

General comments Source: www.nescosrl.it

30

BP24 HOTEL IT3

1. Introduction




Service provider / facilitator Confidential

Location and climatic region Mediterranean – Central Italy




Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 building, 9.000 m2

Age of buildings ~ 30 years

Description of the initial situation The hotel presented a very high H&C energy consumption. The low quality of the outer envelope and the large glazed surface determined a large consumption in both winter and in summer.

Main energy use H&C, lighting



Describe the objective of the building owner Costs reduction, energy efficiency improvement

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year N.A. N.A.


- Thermal insulation of the building envelope (external walls, roof) and of the heat distribution net - Reduction of the solar gains in summer through shadowing - PV plant 67.54 kWp (covering about 10 % of the yearly electricity consumption)

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 607 MWh/y


CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 180 t/y


Payback period (estimated or real) 5.3 years estimated


Particular safeguards conditions White certificates go directly to the ESCo

Details on monitoring and assessment N.A.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Partly self-funded, partly public money (incentives)


Innovations and advantages for the clients Higher investment possible, due to the mix of financing. Very short payback for efficiency measures on the building structure

Best Practice criteria assessment Mix funding and short payback period. Use of performance bond

General comments Project is still in a study phase: it is very important to have a good risk analysis, a clear baseline and the complete MV program before signing the contract.

31

BP25 SPORT CENTRE IT4

1. Introduction


Segment of activity Sport facilities



Location and climatic region Mediterranean - Tuscany



Type of building Sport Hall

Number of buildings and surface in m² 3 buildings ~ 5,000m2

Age of buildings Built in 1968; 1976; 2002

Description of the initial situation Several little units for heating purposes






Sustainable Energy measures implemented Centralized heat generation, heat recovery, metering devices, substitution of existing lamps with LED

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 120 MWh/y (electricity) + 115,000 m3 (natural gas)




Payback period (estimated or real) IRR of the project 7.76 % IRR for the investor 12.36 %

Achieved savings (if already implemented) 9.8 years estimated for the project, 8.5 for the investor



Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Partly self-financing, partly public money (incentives)


Innovations and advantages for the clients Strong costs reduction

Best Practice criteria assessment Mix funding and short payback period. Use of performance bond


32

BP26 OFFICES AND HOSTEL IT5

1. Introduction





Location and climatic region Mediterranean – Northern Italy

Other operators involved A bank as financer; an additional ESCo for the PV plant


Type of building Offices and hostel

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 Building, ~ 1,700m2

Age of buildings 45 y

Description of the initial situation The building needed refurbishment and the management aimed to reach an high efficiency standard, in order to offer more comfort in a low-cost hospitality premise






Sustainable Energy measures implemented - Thermal insulation external walls and roof, - windows replacement - LED, PV plant

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 170 MWh/y (electricity) + 25,000 m3/y (natural gas)




Payback period (estimated or real) IRR of the project 5.45 %

Achieved savings (if already implemented) 4.3 years estimated for the extra costs



Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Partly self-financing, partly financed by a bank


Innovations and advantages for the clients The finance contract and the EPC contract will be aligned in time, in order to ease their realization.

Best Practice criteria assessment Very good negotiation of the financing. Performance bond


33

BP27 5 STAR HOTEL PT1

1. Introduction


Segment of activity Tourism


Service provider / facilitator VIVAPOWER Showrooms

Location and climatic region Madeira - Oceanic



Type of building 5-star Hotel



Description of the initial situation Hotel with casino, fitness centre, pool, spa, restaurants, 379 rooms, common areas, etc. Total electric baseline 2,887 MWh/year; Lighting baseline 407 MWh/year; Pumps baseline 320 MWh/year

Main energy use Electricity and thermal



Describe the objective of the building owner Reducing the cost of energy, improving the energy efficiency of the hotel and, at the same time, maintaining the high quality of the hotel

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 6 years Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented 250 kWn PV Plant + circulation pumps + efficiency lighting

Energy savings guaranteed by contract PV Plant 382 MWh/year + circulation pumps 82 MWh/year + lighting 113 kWh/year

Corresponding financial savings PV Plant 44,321 €/year + circulation pumps 8,712 €/year + efficiency lighting 12,429 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) ~ 208 t CO2

Cost of investment Circulation pumps + efficiency lighting = 56,500 €; PV Plant = 343,661 €; Total investment cost = 400,161 €

Payback period (estimated or real) Circulation pumps + efficiency lighting = 2.7 years; PV Plant = 7.8 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) Confidential

Particular safeguards conditions Performance guarantee of the equipment (PV modules, circulation pumps and efficiency lighting) during the contract period; No energy production guarantee

Details on monitoring and assessment Monitoring the energy production of the PV Plant + Monitoring the circulation pumps and efficiency lighting working hours and consumption

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Mixed financing: 60 % ESCO+ 40 % public


Innovations and advantages for the clients Part of the financing provided by public funds, which was an added value for the client

Best Practice criteria assessment The combination of implemented RES and EE measures will provide a considerable reduction in the electricity costs.

General comments N.A.

34

BP28 RURAL TOURISM PT2

1. Introduction


Segment of activity Tourism


Service provider / facilitator VIVAPOWER Nova

Location and climatic region Portalegre - Mediterranean



Type of building Rural tourism



Description of the initial situation Rural tourism composed by 5 properties

Main energy use N.A.



Describe the objective of the building owner Implementing RES through PV plant


Sustainable Energy measures implemented 456 kWn PV plant

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 903 MWh/year

Corresponding financial savings 99,760 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) ~ 325 t


Payback period (estimated or real) ~ 5years


Particular safeguards conditions Performance guarantee of the PV equipment

Details on monitoring and assessment Monitoring of the PV plant through a dedicated monitoring system



Innovations and advantages for the clients Short payback, no investment

Best Practice criteria assessment Performance of renewable energy is guaranteed and monitored, funding 100 % ESCO and short payback period


35

BP29 LONG-TERM CARE FACILITY PT3

1. Introduction




Service provider / facilitator VIVAPOWER Nova

Location and climatic region Portimão - Mediterranean



Type of building Long-term Care Facilities


Age of buildings Built in 2011 - 4 years

Description of the initial situation Long-term Care Facilities with capacity for 60 patients

Main energy use N.A.



Describe the objective of the building owner Reduce energy cost

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 15 years Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented 30 kWn PV Plant

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 65,805 kWh/year




Payback period (estimated or real) ~ 5 years


Particular safeguards conditions Performance guarantee of the PV equipment




Innovations and advantages for the clients Short payback, no investment

Best Practice criteria assessment Performance of renewable energy is guaranteed and monitored, funding 100 % ESCO and short payback period


36

BP30 RETIREMENT HOME PT4

1. Introduction




Service provider / facilitator Energia Própria

Location and climatic region Borba - Mediterranean



Type of building Retirement Home and Day Care Center

Number of buildings and surface in m² 2,458.37 m²

Age of buildings 1988 - 27 years


Retirement Home and Day Care Center with a community centre; laundry facilities; social, administrative and services areas; bedrooms; toilets; kitchens; etc. Retirement Home occupation is 61 people and Day Care Centre about 24 people. Average consumption: 171 MWh/y (electricity), 472 MWh/y (propane gas)

Main energy use Electricity (HVAC, lighting, equipment); Propane gas (equipment, DWH)



Describe the objective of the building owner The objective was to implement EE and RES that promote and reduce energy consumption of the building,

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 15 years (only in the case of the PV Plant)

Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented 65 kWn PV Plant + Solar thermal panels + biomass boilers + pumps + pipe insulation + efficient lighting + monitoring system

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 116,320 kWh/year (for the PV plant with EPC); Total savings for EE measures: 26.9 kWh/year (electricity) + 200.7 kWh/year (propane gas)

Corresponding financial savings

12,319 €/year (for the PV Plant with EPC); EE measures: 1,136 €/year (Solar thermal) + 5,795 €/year (biomass boiler) + 155 €/year (pumps) + 2,073 €/year (pipe insulation) + 2,690 €/year (lighting) + 3,195 €/year (monitoring system); Total financing savings for EE: 15,423 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) ~ 42 t (for the PV Plant with EPC) + 30 t (EE measures)

Cost of investment

73,005 € (for the PV plant with EPC) + EE measures: 11,300 € (solar thermal) + 41,815 € (biomass boiler) + 2,260 € (pumps) + 4,840 € (pipe insulation) + 22,990 € (lighting) + 21,900 € (monitoring system). Total investment for EE measures: 104,900 €

Payback period (estimated or real) ~ 6 years (for the PV plant) + 6,8 years (for EE measures)

Particular safeguards conditions Performance guarantee of the PV equipment during the EPC contract.

Details on monitoring and assessment Monitoring of the PV Plant and EE measures

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % ESCO (for PV Plant) + 100 % national funds for EE measures


Innovations and advantages for the clients Mixed investment which will benefit the client in terms of energy savings and cost reduction

Best Practice criteria assessment Mixed of investment, EPC and services dealing with RES and EE

General comments PV plant with EPC contract and EE measures implementation without

37

BP31 SWIMMING POOL PT5

1. Introduction


Segment of activity Sport Facility

Type of contract (EPC/other) Implementation of EE measures

Service provider / facilitator Self Energy Engineering & Innovation

Location and climatic region Fiães - Mediterranean



Type of building Indoor swimming pool



Description of the initial situation Sports Complex with indoor swimming pool, with common areas, bathrooms, sports halls, classrooms, technical areas, etc.

Main energy use Electricity and Natural gas



Describe the objective of the building owner Implementation of RES and EE measures


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Pipe insulation + lighting + variable speed drivers + isothermal pool cover + solar thermal system + monitoring system

Energy savings guaranteed by contract

169,741 kWh/year (Isothermal pool cover) + 19,949 kWh/year (solar thermal system) + 4,892 kWh/year (lighting) + 2,355 kWh/year (variable speed drivers) + 32,251 kWh/year (pipe insulation) + 75,939 kWh/year (monitoring system)

Corresponding financial savings

6,000 €/year (isothermal pool cover) + 600 €/year (solar thermal system) + 405 €/year (lighting) + 195 €/year (variable speed drivers) + 970 €/year (pipe insulation) + 3,000 €/year (monitoring system). Total financial savings: 11,170 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total ~ 67 t

Cost of investment

43,500 € (Isothermal pool cover) + 10,000 € (solar thermal system) + 2,000 € (lighting) + 1,260 € (variable speed drivers) + 3,200 € (pipe insulation) + 23,000 € (monitoring system) Total cost of investment: 82,960 €

Payback period (estimated or real)

7 years (Isothermal pool cover) + 16 years (solar thermal system) + 5 years (lighting) + 6 years (variable speed drivers) + 3 years (pipe insulation) + 4 years (monitoring system). Total payback period: ~ 7 years



Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Financed by a National Fund


Innovations and advantages for the clients No investment by the Client and the Sport Complex will be the main beneficiary of the implementation of the measures

Best Practice criteria assessment Project implementation combining the installation of RES and EE measures dedicated to sport facilities

General comments No EPC in this project. Only implementation of RES and EE measures in order to reduce the consumption of the sport facility

38

BP32 HYPERMARKET PT6

1. Introduction


Segment of activity Hypermarket



Location and climatic region Santa Maria da Feira - Mediterranean



Type of building Hypermarket


Age of buildings Built in 1998 - 17 years

Description of the initial situation Hypermarket with shopping gallery, toilets, technical areas, offices, kitchens, parking car, sales area, etc. Baseline 2.910.187 kWh/year (electrical consumption)

Main energy use Electricity, Natural gas and diesel



Describe the objective of the building owner Rationalizing the building's energy consumption by implementing energy efficiency measures and, consequently, the reduction of bills


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Replacement of the existing lighting

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 231,877 kWh/year




Payback period (estimated or real) ~ 2 years



Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Potentially will be financed by a local/national fund


Innovations and advantages for the clients Combination of local/national fund, with EE measure dedicated to the lighting system with sort payback, maintaining and ensuring the quality of system

Best Practice criteria assessment Short payback period

General comments Project is still in a study phase

39

BP33 HOSPITAL PT7

1. Introduction





Location and climatic region Lousada - Mediterranean





Age of buildings 2001 - 14 years

Description of the initial situation Hospital with rooms, technical areas, bathrooms, living rooms, office rooms, observation rooms and consultation, medical operation rooms, bar, changing rooms, common areas, isolation rooms, pharmacy, etc.

Main energy use Electricity and Propane Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention (if available)

N.A.


Describe the objective of the building owner Costs savings maintaining the operation of the building


Sustainable Energy measures implemented Biomass boiler + lighting

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 106,628 kWh/year (lighting) + 450,635 kWh/year (biomass boiler)

Corresponding financial savings 8,060 €/year (lighting) + 21,982 €/year (biomass boiler)

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 41 t

Cost of investment 11,956 € (lighting) + 128,571 € (biomass boiler)

Payback period (estimated or real) 1.5 years (lighting) + 6 years (biomass boiler)




Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) National Fund


Innovations and advantages for the clients Financing by a National Fund, ensuring the energy and costs savings for the client

Best Practice criteria assessment Combination with National Fund and simple EE measures with short payback

General comments Project is still in a study phase

NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS · NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS Fact sheets on best practice...

Documents

Transcript of NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS · NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS Fact sheets on best practice...