National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

10
National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013

Transcript of National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

Page 1: National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

National Preparedness ReportUnderstanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013

Page 2: National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

Kathleen Fox April 16, 2013

Assessing National Preparedness FEMA is measuring progress on the implementation of the National Preparedness System and reporting this progress annually.

Presidential Policy Directive 8 (PPD-8) calls for an annual National Preparedness Report (NPR) Summarizes the Nation’s progress in building, sustaining,

and delivering core capabilities described in the National Preparedness Goal

Provides a comprehensive, national-level evaluation of all 31 capabilities

Identifies national areas of strength and areas for improvement

2

Page 3: National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

Kathleen Fox April 16, 2013

State Perspectives on PreparednessStates and territories are required to report to FEMA annually on their level of preparedness

Since 2011, states have used the State Preparedness Report (SPR) tool to assess capabilities across all 31 core capabilities in the Goal.

In 2012, States and territories used the THIRA process to set targets for each core capability. The SPR measures their ability to achieve these targets.

The National Preparedness Report includes aggregate SPR data.

3

Page 4: National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

Kathleen Fox April 16, 2013

SPR Outputs

4

While threat/hazard and capability targets come from different sources in 2011 and 2012, the capability data outputs are the same.

Page 5: National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

Kathleen Fox April 16, 2013

State Perspectives on PreparednessStates and territories continue to report the highest capability levels in those areas frequently cited as high priority 9 of the 10 highest rated

capabilities were either Common capabilities (Planning, Public Information and Warning, Operational Coordination) or fell within the Response mission area.

Recovery-focused capabilities and Cybersecurity remain among the lowest-rated capabilities.

5

Page 6: National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

Kathleen Fox April 16, 2013

State Perspectives: Capabilities With Most Progress

30% of states reported that Operational Coordination is one of the three core capabilities they made the most progress in during 2012

Page 7: National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

Kathleen Fox April 16, 2013

State Perspectives: Capabilities Most in Danger of Decline

18% of states reported that Screening, Search and Detection is one of the three core capabilities most in danger of decreasing

Page 8: National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

Kathleen Fox April 16, 2013

Addressing Capability Gaps Federal, state, and territorial views on expected roles for addressing capability gaps may differ

8

Page 9: National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

Kathleen Fox April 16, 2013

National Preparedness Report The 2013 NPR marks the second iteration of the NPR

2012 report focused on progress made in the decade following the September 11, 2001 attacks

2013 NPR highlights accomplishments achieved or reported on during 2012

Delivered to the President April 1, 2013 Will be publicly released upon White House approval Available at http://www.fema.gov.com

9

Page 10: National Preparedness Report Understanding Core Capabilities 16 April 2013.

End of presentation