National Food Security Mission

Investment for assured increase in Production of Food Grains

Structure

Big impetus from 2010-11

Expansion of NFSM

4

All Districts for Rice in Eastern Region

All Pulses Districts

From 2010-11 Outlay for food crops increased from 4882 crores to 9500 crores with support of RKVY

NFSM Releases to states 2007-08 to 2011-12

Rs in crores

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12 Total

Releases 382 831 983 1130 1082 4408Exp 160 719 1111 1182 372 3543% Exp 42 69 85 87 30Unspent balances 222 334 206 154

In addition, 293 crores spent 89 % out of 330 crores released to Central Agencies. So total of 3836 crores spent against total release of 4738 crores. An amount of 4882 crores is the approved outlay.

Expenditure at Central Level

State Releases % Release Exp % ExpU.P 873 20 680 78

Maharashtra 477 11 414 87M.P 472 11 326 69AP 461 10 383 83

Bihar 272 6 222 81Orissa 249 6 229 92

WB 213 5 187 88Rajasthan 222 5 165 74Karnataka 218 5 179 82

Punjab 203 5 165 81Chhattisgarh 182 4 142 78

Assam 170 4 148 87TN 142 3 114 80

Haryana 121 3 97 80Gujarat 79 2 65 82

Jharkhand 43 1 23 53Kerala 9 0.2 7 75

J&K 3 0.06 0 0Total 4408 100 3544 80

Releases and Expenditure in Rs Crores upto 31st Dec 11

NFSM RiceComponent Exp % Ratio Under OverSeeds 35 11:3 BH (6), MP (7), UP (8), WB , GJ

(9), MH (11), AS (14), KA (18), OR (23), JH , TN (24)

AP (37), KL (40 ), CG (44)

Nutrients 25 13:1 TN, CG (6), JH (7), MH, GJ (9), BH (10), KA (11), AP, MP , OR (13), UP (14), KL (19), AS (24)

WB (38)

Plant Protection

8 5:9 BH (2), AS (3), AP (4), UP (6), CG (7)

OR (8), JH, TN (9), KL (11), MH (13), WB (14), MP (18), KA (21)

Machinery 15 0:14 MP (17), KL (23), CG (25), AP, WB (26), JH (29), OR (33), KA (37), AS (43), MH (45), Guj (46), UP (50), BH (51), TN (52)

Local Initiatives

<10 4:10 AS (13), BH (14), MP, GJ(17) UP (2), WB, KA, KL, JH (3), TN, CG (5), AP (8), MH, OR (9)

Instead of Seeds and Nutrients, States preferred PP and Farm Machinery to promote NFSM Rice

NFSM Wheat

Component Exp % Ratio Under OverSeeds 35 6:3 WB (7), MP (19), HR (20),

MH (22), GJ (33), PB (34)BH (43), RJ (55), UP (60)

Nutrients 25 6:3 BH (8), RJ, MH (11), MP (13, UP (14), GJ (22)

HR, PB (26), WB (47)

Machinery 15 0:9 RJ (18), UP (20), PB (25), WB (27), BH (30), GJ (31), MP (39), MH (48), HR (53)

Local Initiatives

<10 4:5 MH (13), WB (12), MP, BH (11)

UP (3), GJ (5), PB (6), RJ (7), HR (8)

Generally well balanced uptake

NFSM PulsesComponent Exp %

RatioUnder Over

Seeds 35 14:1 WB (3), PB (4), HR, OR (6), BH (11), MP (12), TN, GJ (13), MH (15), CG, JH (17), AS (21), RJ (23), KA (27)

AP (52)

Nutrients 25 12:3 AP (6), JH (8), KA (9), MP (11), RJ (12), BH, AS, TN (14), PB (18), MH (19), CG (20), UP (21)

HR (25), WB (27), GJ (31)

Plant Protection

8 7:8 BH, RJ (2), PB, HR (3), UP (5), AP, JH (6)

CG (13), GJ , AS (14), OR (15), MP (16), KA, MH (17), WB (30)

Machinery 15 3:12 KA (10), TN, AP (12), RJ (20), WB, GJ (23), AS (25), JH (26), MH (31), BH, CG (36), UP (40), OR (41), PB (52), HR (55)

Local Initiatives

<10 4:11 BH (14), RJ (18), PB, TN (21) KA (2),UP (3), AS, CG, MP (4), MH, GJ (5), AP (6), HR, WB (7), OR (10)

Seed not so relevant to Pulses, as management practices

National pattern of Expenditure

Component Expected % Rice Wheat Pulses

Seeds 35 19 43 22

INM 25 15 15 14

Machinery 15 37 28 26Plant Protection 8 8 11

Local Initiative <10 7 5 7

% increase in achievement of physical targets under NFSM – National

Crop Seeds INM IPM Farm

machinery

Rice 17-81 43-68 54-77 22-100

Wheat 53-95 21-83 - 61-100

Pulses 69-74 29-97 61-87 24-100

Significant outputs

Output Area covered (approx.)

Farmers benefited(approx.)

7.40 lakh demonstrations 2.96 lakh ha 7.4 lakh farmers

146.48 lakh qtls of HYV rice, wheat, pulses distributed

261.07 lakh ha 181 lakh farmers

Nearly 54000 qtls of hybrid rice distributed

3.3 lakh ha 3.5 lakh farmers

Nearly 105 lakh hac treated with gypsum/lime/micronutrients

105 lakh ha 69 lakh farmers

43 lakh ha of farm land treated under Integrated Pest Management

43 lakh ha 30 lakh farmers

31.80 lakh farm implements ( including pump sets & sprinklers) distributed

31.80 lakh farmers

Capacity building of the farmers through nearly 44021 Farmers Field Schools

13.21 lakh farmers

Production in NFSM Rice States change from 2006-07 in 2010-11

Production in NFSM Wheat States change from 2006-07 in 2010-11

Production in NFSM Pulses Stateschange from 2006-07 in 2010-11

“We need a second green revolution in Agriculture. We

can tackle the problem of rising food prices only by

increasing agriculture production and productivity.

We also need to increase agriculture production to

implement a food security law. We will accelerate

our efforts in this direction in the 12th plan”.

Hon’ble Prime Minister in his address to the nation on Independence Day (15th August, 2011)

Commitment

NFSM in 12th plan

Components 11th plan 12th plan

Crops Rice, Wheat, Pulses Rice, wheat, Pulses, fodder, Millets and Maize

Aim & objective

Food grains security Foodgrains and fodder security

Additional Foodgrains production target

20 million tons Rice- 10, Wheat-8, Pulses-2 m. tons

25 million tons Rice- 10, Wheat- 10 ; Pules-3, Coarse cereals- 2 million tons

Area of operation

19 states and 481 districts

All the states and districts -for additional stabilized foodgrain production

Focus Low productive potential areas

Low productive areas for additional production and high productive areas for sustained production through conservation agriculture

NFSM in 12th plan

Components 11th plan 12th plan

Technical individual crop specific interventions

•Cropping System based Block demonstrations in cluster approach-

•Accelerated Crop Production programme- 15% of low productive areas

•Sustainable Crop Production Programme- 30% of high productive areas

•Special emphasis on development of remote & inaccessible areas through NGOs

Strategic research not part of the scheme

Support to national and international agencies for adaptive research

Subsidy rates Upward revisions as per current costsNew interventions Farm Machinery, asset building and

rainwater harvesting structures

NFSM Ecosystem

PilotsSolar fencingCGIAR projectsNCIPMNABARD/SFAC

StudiesPMTs and CDDsNCAPAERCsFAO

Performance orientationIndicators - NPCKrishi Karman AwardsFellowships

MoU with IRRI and CIMMYTVisitsTraining

Outlooks - NCAERProduction – DES, NCFCPrice – DES, DCAMarkets – Agmarknet, CETrade – DGFT, Stocks – FPDUtilization – NSSO

Web siteInformationInteraction

Social MediaBlogTwitterFacebook

17 Study Topics across StatesTopics Directorates/NFSM

Consultant Likely issues to be studied

Potential and constraints in Conservation Agriculture Practices in East U.P. and Bihar (only two best districts)

DWD, GhaziabadNFSM Consultants-Machinery/BGREI

Feasibility of conservation agriculture in view of soil and crop cycle. How many have continued after programme shifted to other farmers? Is any other viable practice? What is the gain in productivity? Higher productivity due to better crop stand/geometry or early sowing? How much cost saving, if any?Does cost savings takes into account the loss of crop residue which could have been used for economic purposes?

DRD Patna, Dr.S.S.Singh, & Mr. S.V Singh,ConsultantBGREI

Impact of irrigation pumps in productivity gain of rice in West Bengal

DJD Kolkata, Consultants- Mr. Shamsher Singh and Mr. S.V.Singh

What was the productivity level before pump installed?Is adequate electricity supply available for operation?Any viable alternative? Quality of water being pumped-more of arsenic/salt or normal?

Adoption of System of rice intensification in Tamilnadu- constraints, prospects

DTD Chennai, NFSM Consultant –Dr.Saini, Consultant, NFSM

Are all 6 concepts of SRI followed? If not what are the practices followed? How many farmers continued/discontinued the practice? Reason for continuing or discontinuing? What is the productivity gain? Suggestions for improvement.

Reasons for low productivity in some districts of Tamilnadu- Ramnathpuram, Shivaganga etc. –and strategy for improvement

DTD Chennai, NFSM Consultant –Dr.D.G.Gupta, 60000 pulses villages

Reasons for low performance. Technology promoted and its performance. What could be alternatives? Whether demanded or forced? How does it link with SREP and C-DAP?

Reasons for low productivity in Karnataka and strategy for improvement

DOD, HyderabdDr.G.P.Gupta & R.S.Saini, Consultant , NFSM

Reasons for low performance. Technology promoted and its performance. What could be alternatives? Whether demanded or forced? How does it link with SREP and C-DAP?

Impact of ICRISAT initiatives in rice fallows in Chhattisgarh

DPD, BhopalDr.R.K.Gupta& Dr. Shankar lal Consultants , NFSM

Is it crop replacement or additional area gained? Why no crop was being taken by farmers earlier? How much area out of total fallow is feasible for steady crop coverage? Replacement of existing practices/varieties with ICRISAT variety, if any Is there better option? Productivity and production gain?

Responses from the States • Crop situation for kharif pulses and Rabi• Coordination with SASA for area and production figures• Complete concurrent evaluations, particularly for lagging

districts – what works and what does not?• Complete Online data entry from Districts into MIS• APY data of the districts upto 2010-11 • Assign State and District PMTs to work on study topics• Information for A3P booklet in the prescribed format • Popularize Ridge Furrow Planters for pulses• Progress of approved additional pulses program of NFSM • Status of pest surveillance in A3P units of NFSM & RKVY

Sum up• Mission is an engrossing journey and its work

fulfilling for personal and professional development• More responsibility in 12th Plan would demand

better organization of work• Farmers as well as the field functionaries need to be

armed with better technologies and tools• Developing networks of professionals across

institutions would be the key to success

Thank You!