National Action Plan on Chemical (d l)(industrial ...

National Action Plan on Chemical ( d l) k(industrial) Disaster Risk

Managementg

Dr Rakesh DubeyDr Rakesh DubeyDirector

Disaster Management Instituteandand

Member Secretary, National Action Planat

CIDM 2010 MumbaiCIDM 2010 Mumbai

National Action Plan is under the process of preparation under the Chairmanship of Lt. p p pGen. (Dr) J R Bhardwaj, Hon’ble Member

NDMA, GOI ,

February 16, 2010 CIDM 2010, Mumbai 2

Evolution of National idrm systemEvolution of National idrm system

Monitoring,

Participatory and self evaluation

I tit ti

g,enforcement is on

approach has started

Institutions and Regulations ExistingExisting

February 16, 2010 3CIDM 2010, Mumbai

Prevention/

/ iti ti

Preparedness

Response

/mitigation

Action Plan


We suggest the model on th l ft f ti lthe left for action plan

Preparedness1. Prepardness : includes planning, prevention and mitigation i.e.

Safe

Risk assessment (HAZOP, FEMA, FTA, ETA, consequence assessment, probability estimation, etc. audits; on‐site and off‐site emergency plans, Training

Safe Society

Engineering change/modification for prevention and mitigation

ISO’s, OSHAS, Formal education in the area of safety,

Response

o a educa o e a ea o sa e y,risk assessment, medical, fire fighting,

2. Response: Human behaviour, community involvement and participation in emergency process, response of fire fighters medical response police (lawfighters, medical response, police (law and order) eg Mock drills

These can be enhanced by Training, awareness building measures and integration with business continuity programme


• Planning: GIS based on‐site and emergency management plans

Prepardness :management plansRisk assessment should make a base for plansReach to all important stake holders by includes planning, prevention and using some common platform

• Prevention:Compliance of laws and rules, by doing risk assessment after assessing the

mitigation

i.e. Risk assessment (HAZOP, FEMA, FTA, ETA, consequence assessment, assessment after assessing the

consequences and probability by using HAZOP, FEMA, ETA, FTA and computer model for consequence analysisMiti ti

qprobability estimation, etc. audits; on‐site and off‐site emergency plans, ISO’s, OSHAS, compliance of the laws, engineering modification

• MitigationChange in process, chemicals, instrumention, machine, training of human beings, community and civil administartin

Strengthening the regulators by knowledge upgradation to meet the challenges

invovment• Training

Planning, Prevention and mitigationFormal education in the area of safety, risk assessment, medical, fire fighting, for cadre development


System descriptionSystem description

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION METHODS:

Process hazard checklist

Hazard identification

Scenario identification

Hazard identification

Scenario identification‐ Process hazard checklist

‐ Hazard survey: DOW index

‐ HAZOP hazard & operability study

‐ Safety reviewAccident

probabilityAccident

consequencesAccident

probabilityAccident

consequences

RISK ASSESSMENT:

‐What can go wrong & how ?

What are the chances ?

Risk determinationRisk determination

‐What are the chances ?

‐ Consequences ?

EXTREMES:

risk &hazard

acceptable Modify designN

risk &hazard

acceptable Modify designN

‐ Low probability

‐Minimal consequences

acceptable?

A t t

Y

acceptable?

A t t

Y

Accept systemAccept system


Causality chainCausality chain

EmissionEmissionEmissionEmission

MODELLINGEnvironmental

distribution

MODELLINGor

MONITORING

Exposure

EffectsEffects


Spatial scalesSpatial scalespp

L l lL l lLocal scaleLocal scaleArea around one point Area around one point source/one industrysource/one industry

Average environmental Average environmental characteristicscharacteristics

““Reasonable worst Reasonable worst casecase”” scenarioscenario


Regional scaleRegional scaleRegional scaleRegional scaleArea Area can be can be 200 x 200 km200 x 200 km

20 million inhabitants 20 million inhabitants

100 or 10% of production 100 or 10% of production

Average environmentalAverage environmentalcharacteristicscharacteristics

Two or more sourcesTwo or more sources


Types of EmissionsTypes of Emissions

8

10

12

8

10

12

0

2

4

6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

0

2

4

6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Continuous emissions Peak emissions

4

6

8

10

12

4

6

8

10

12

0

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Intermittent emissions

0

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Block emissions


Hazards and Risks in industriesHazards and Risks in industries

• LPG Propane (under pressure in liquid phase)LPG , Propane (under pressure in liquid phase)

• Ammonia (under pressure/refrigeration in liquid phase)liquid phase)

• Chlorine (under pressure in liquid phase)

• Hydrogen (under pressure in gases)

• CO + CH4 (under atmosphere )( p )


ResponseResponse

What can IWhat can I do

• Recognize• AvoidI• Isolate

• Notify


• Training Plant staff from top to bottom including

Response the contractual labours, visitors, associates likes traders, suppliers consumers

• Community Involvement of community in all important activities, disclosure of vital Human behaviour, community

involvement and participation ininformation with preparedness

• National/state/local GovernmentsAssessment of weakness in medical

involvement and participation in emergency process, response of fire fighters, medical response, police (law and order) eg Mock drills

preparedness, fire fighting, law and order and corrective measures

• Mockdrills

drills

Compliance of regulations

By involving all stakeholders including, armed forces and NDRF


Protection layers for disaster free society

Plant engineering, material, l i i kprocess, control equipments, risk

and training, regulatory compliances

Dialogue with plant personnel including contractors, disclosure of information of hazards and risk, mitigation, preparedness

Dialogue with local govts, community, disclosure of hazards, risks,hazards, risks, preparedness, response, mitigation,


Knowledge platform for example:www.hrdp‐idrm.in

February 16, 2010 CIDM 2010, Mumbai 16

Seven AvenuesSeven AvenuesPotential countermeasures for each modern causation approach include:

1SAFETY

MANAGEMENT 2 3 4 5 6 7MANAGEMENTERROR

TRAINING

2 3 4 5 6 7

EDUCATIONMOTIVATIONTASK DESIGN



2SAFETY

PROGRAM 3 4 5 6 71 PROGRAMDEFECT

REVISE INFORMATION

3 4 5 6 71

COLLECTIONANALYSISIMPLEMENTATION



3COMMANDERROR 4 5 6 71 2

TRAINING

4 5 6 71 2

EDUCATIONMOTIVATIONTASK DESIGN



4

5 6 71 2 3SYSTEM DEFECT

DESIGN REVISION VIA--SOP

5 6 73

- SOP- REGULATIONS- POLICY LETTERS- STATEMENTS- STATEMENTS



5

6 71 2 3 4OPERATING ERROR

ENGINEERING

6 71 2 3 4 ERROR

TRAININGMOTIVATION



6

71 2 3 4 5 MISHAP 7PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

1 2 3 4 5

BARRIERSSEPARATION



7

1 2 3 4 5 6 RESULT

CONTAINMENT

1 2 3 4 5 6

FIREFIGHTINGRESCUEEVACUATIONFIRST AIDFIRST AID


Preparedness + Response have basePreparedness + Response have base

Elimin SubstiElimination

Substitution

Engineering control

administrative


[email protected]@kindly visit www.hrdp‐idrm.in


National Action Plan on Chemical (d l)(industrial ...

Documents

Transcript of National Action Plan on Chemical (d l)(industrial ...