NAMAs and Agriculture

18
NAMAs and Agriculture Heather Jacobs Francesco Tubiello Rocío Cóndor FAO -- Climate, Energy and Tenure Division Asia Pacific Regional Workshop on NAMAs Vientiane, Laos 22-25 April, 2014

description

Authors: Heather Jacobs, Francesco Tubiello, Rocío Cóndor FAO -- Climate, Energy and Tenure Division Asia Pacific Regional Workshop on NAMAs Vientiane, Laos 22-25 April, 2014 1. Agriculture is an important socio-economic sector 2. Agriculture is an important GHG emitter 3. Synergies between Mitigation, Adaptation and Food Security: An opportunity for agriculture NAMAs

Transcript of NAMAs and Agriculture

Page 1: NAMAs and Agriculture

NAMAs  and  Agriculture    

Heather Jacobs Francesco Tubiello Rocío Cóndor FAO -- Climate, Energy and Tenure Division

Asia Pacific Regional Workshop on NAMAs Vientiane, Laos 22-25 April, 2014

Page 2: NAMAs and Agriculture

1. Agriculture is an important socio-economic sector

•  GDP: The agricultural sector constitutes a substantial portion of GDP in many developing countries, contributing significantly to export earnings and employment

•  Average percent share of agriculture in GDP (World Bank, 2013):

–  Africa 23% –  Asia 22% –  Latin America 10% –  High-income developed countries 3-4%

•  Agriculture provides jobs for about two-thirds of these populations -- economic health is linked to the prosperity of farming communities

•  NAMAs can assist countries in maintaining and enhancing agricultural productivity.

Page 3: NAMAs and Agriculture

Agriculture GDP share, Asia-Pacific

0.0  

5.0  

10.0  

15.0  

20.0  

25.0  

30.0  

35.0  

40.0  

45.0  

50.0  

Source: World Bank, 2010

Page 4: NAMAs and Agriculture

2. Agriculture is an important GHG emitter

Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks, 1990 – 2011 Analysis, FAO http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/i3671e/i3671e.pdf

Page 5: NAMAs and Agriculture

 Why is AFOLU important for NAMAs?

•  The share of agriculture emissions to total AFOLU net emissions remained constant over 1990-2010 -- 62%

•  By contrast, the share of agriculture to AFOLU emissions by sources (excluding FOLU sinks) increased, from 44% in the 1990s to 50% in the 2000s

 

-3,000

-2,000

-1,000

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

Agriculture Net Forest Conversion

Cultivation of Organic Soils and Peat Fires

Biomass Fires Forest

MtC

O2e

q

AFOLU Sources and Sinks, 2001-2010, by sub-sector

Page 6: NAMAs and Agriculture

3. Synergies between Mitigation, Adaptation and Food Security: An opportunity for agriculture NAMAs

 

q  Integration of mitigation, adaptation and resilience, including food security goals, could help further leverage funding, as the agriculture sector presents a potential opportunity to integrate NAMAs/NAPs •  Joint adaptation and mitigation options include:

»  Measures that reduce soil degradation »  Measures that reduce leaching of N and phosphorus »  Increased diversity of crop rotations »  Agroforestry practice

q Agriculture offers significant opportunity to link adaptation, resilience, mitigation and food security goals into one coherent package

         

Page 7: NAMAs and Agriculture

Current Status of agriculture NAMAs: Still some way to go

6  

46  

11  

41  

103  

124  

0  

20  

40  

60  

80  

100  

120  

140  

UNFCCC NAMA Registry UNEP Risoe NAMA Pipeline (Submissions of Intent to

UNFCCC)

ECOFYS NAMA Database

Agriculture/Forestry NAMAs All NAMAs

Page 8: NAMAs and Agriculture

FAO Findings: Barriers to Agriculture NAMAs

•  Most barriers are not specific to GHG mitigation -- they also hinder other agricultural development objectives

•  Agriculture has received a small proportion of climate financing •  Data:

Ø  Availability is lacking Ø  Uncertainty is high Ø  Public official data not sufficient Ø  Data discrepancies between agencies/ministries and reports Ø  Gaps in disaggregated data

•  Obstacles in domestic policies •  Inter-institutional coordination is weak •  Lack of readiness in agricultural sector – and the need to address

farmers’ concerns and equity considerations    

Page 9: NAMAs and Agriculture

National GHG Inventories, Baselines, and MRV

•  Improved data collection and sound GHG emission inventories within robust National data systems enable development of baselines and MRV of NAMAs

•  To identify emissions hotspots and develop GHG

baselines, adequate data are necessary; Non-Annex 1 countries may have large gaps

 

Page 10: NAMAs and Agriculture

Some FAO contributions  §  Preliminary NAMA Analysis §  NAMA Guidelines for Agriculture

Ø  National integrated mitigation planning in agriculture: A review paper http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/i3237e/i3237e.pdf

Ø  National planning for GHG mitigation in agriculture:

A guidance document http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3324e/i3324e.pdf

§  GHG Data and analysis tools linked to National GHG

Inventory Processes, including BURs and baseline projections

Page 11: NAMAs and Agriculture

Addressing  Data  and  Ins3tu3onal  Gaps  FAOSTAT Emissions database for AFOLU Released on Apr 14th 2014, contributes to IPCC AR5 WGIII •  Platform containing domains for AFOLU GHG emissions at global,

regional, and national level (identification of hotspots, baselines, projections)

•  Four dimensions of applicability: 1)  Global and regional assessments 2)  Filling data gaps and building capacity 3)  QA/QC of national data 4)  Development of indicators

Regional Workshops on Statistics for GHG emissions •  Assist Member countries with agricultural data collection in order to

prepare BURs and NAMAs; provides exchange of experiences between countries

 

Page 12: NAMAs and Agriculture

Asia: Enteric Fermentation by Animal Type Average 2000-2010

Source: FAOSTAT, 2013

0  

50  

100  

150  

200  

250  

300  

MtC

O2e

q

Page 13: NAMAs and Agriculture

Asia – Enteric Fermentation by Animal Type Average 2000-2010

42%  Dairy  Ca<le  

35%  Non-­‐Dairy  Ca<le  

16%  Sheep  

 

16%  Buffaloes  

10%  Dairy  Ca<le  

10%  Goats  

51%  Non-­‐Dairy  Ca<le  

9%  Sheep  

Central Asia

Eastern Asia

39%    Buffaloes  

18%  Dairy  Ca<le  

7%    Goats  

31%  Non-­‐Dairy  Ca<le  

4%  Sheep  

South Asia

27%  Buffaloes  

 6%  

Dairy  Ca<le  4%  

Goats  

61%  Non-­‐Dairy  Ca<le  

Southeast Asia

3%    Camels  

37%  Dairy  Ca<le  

7%  Goats  

29%  Non-­‐Dairy  Ca<le  

21%  Sheep  

Western Asia

Source: FAOSTAT, 2013

Page 14: NAMAs and Agriculture

Trends and BASELINE Projections

62% Enteric Fermentation

24%

0  

500  

1000  

1500  

2000  

2500  

3000  

3500  

2000   2001   2002   2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2030   2050  

MtCO2eq  

 Asia: Agriculture by Category, 2000-2050

Burning - crop residues Burning - Savanna Crop Residues

Enteric Fermentation Manure applied to Soils Manure left on Pasture

Manure Management Rice Cultivation Synthetic Fertilizers

Page 15: NAMAs and Agriculture

Capacity Development Activities •  Technical Capacities

-  Assess and report GHG emissions from AFOLU activities (Biennial Update Reports)

-  Identify mitigation options, including Nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMAs)

•  Functional Capacities -  Access, generate, manage and exchange information and

knowledge towards robust GHG inventory, BURs, NAMA, and national data systems

-  Collaborate with relevant national and international agencies and institutions for efficient support to countries

•  Three levels: Regional (workshops); Sub-regional (Mesoamerica) National (Ecuador, Colombia, Indonesia, and 27 countries using FAOSTAT)

Page 16: NAMAs and Agriculture

Conclusions •  Agriculture is a key sector in developing countries: large share of

agricultural GDP; large employer; engine of rural development •  Agriculture (and Forestry and other land uses) is a key emission

sector globally and especially in developing countries •  NAMAs should capitalize on opportunities to achieve national

mitigation planning alongside rural development and food security goals, exploring linked financial opportunities

•  National GHG inventories based on robust data are necessary for the development of baselines and the identification of emissions hotspots and mitigation targets, hence for NAMA MRVs

•  FAO supports member countries with a range of products, including guidelines and GHG data products such as the FAOSTAT Emissions database

Page 17: NAMAs and Agriculture

For  more  informa3on  

                           Financed    by:  

FAO -Monitoring and Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Potential in Agriculture (MAGHG): [email protected] FAO/MAGHG web site: http://www.fao.org/climatechange/micca/ghg/en/ http://www.fao.org/climatechange/micca/ghg/fr/ http://www.fao.org/climatechange/micca/ghg/es/ FAOSTAT web site: http://faostat.fao.org FAOSTAT emission database (English, French and Spanish): Emissions – Agriculture http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/download/G1/*/E Emissions – Land Use http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/download/G2/*/E Report of the Second FAO Workshop on Statistics for Greenhouse Gas Emissions 03 - 04 June 2013, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3397e/i3397e.pdf Report of the Third FAO Regional Workshop on Statistics for Greenhouse Gas Emissions 02 - 03 December 2013, Casablanca, Morocco http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/i3624e/i3624e.pdf

Page 18: NAMAs and Agriculture

Thank you!

Contact: [email protected] MAGHG: www.fao.org/climatechange/micca/ghg FAOSTAT: http://faostat.fao.org

                           Financed  by: