N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

18
The influence of local calibration on the quality of UV-VIS spectrometer measurements in urban stormwater monitoring N. Caradot, H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

description

The influence of local calibration on the quality of UV-VIS spectrometer measurements in urban stormwater monitoring. N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin. Online CSO monitoring in Berlin. Separate sewer system. 10 km. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Page 1: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

The influence of local calibration on the quality of UV-VIS spectrometer measurements in urban

stormwater monitoring

N. Caradot, H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. RouaultKompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Page 2: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Combined sewer system

Separate sewer system

CSO monitoring station N

Online CSO monitoring in Berlin

10 km

Page 3: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Online CSO monitoring in Berlin

Page 4: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Manufacturerglobal calibration

• default manufacturer configuration• for typical municipal waste or river

More than 50% error (Austrian study, Gamerith et al., 2011)

Online probes need to be calibrated to local conditions !!!

Absorbance measurement

ConcentrationsTSS, COD, etc.

LocalconcentrationsTSS, COD, etc.

Userlocal calibration

Spectrometer calibration and uncertainties

Page 5: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Spectrometer calibration and uncertainties (COD)

• error spectro us=3%

• error from lab ul=10%

• Calculation using Monte-Carlo analysis

10,000 regressions

• Mean a and b

SD a and b

Y=a1.x+b1

Y=a2.x+b2

…Y=a.x+b

± u(y)

Calibration error:Error from calibration curve (confidence interval)Error from new prediction

RMSE1

)²()(

nRMSEu i

Page 6: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

CSO COD load: sources of uncertainty

Source of uncertainty

Estimation Contribution to load uncertainty

Concentration

Calibration curve ± Confidence interval 10 %

New prediction ± RMSE 70 %

Field installation ± 10% (Assumption) 10 %

Flow

Cross section ± 1 cm10 %

Velocity ± 0,05 m / s

• RMSE contributes to > 70% of load uncertainty underlines the importance of the collection of samples to build reliable

local calibration function

… what is the optimal sampling effort to calibrate the probes ?

1

)²()(

nRMSEu i

Page 7: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

• Sampling during CSO events parallel to online measurements– Flow trigger (> 0.3 m³/s)– Grab sampling each 5 minutes

• 15 CSO events with a minimum of 5 samples (75 samples) between 2010 and 2012

Data available for spectrometer calibration in Berlin

Page 8: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Calibration parameter + uncertainty All events

Using all 75 samples (i.e. 15 events)total COD load is 29 t

Page 9: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Calibration parameter + uncertainty Chronology of events

At least 20 samples (i.e. 4 events) :stable coefficients and uncertaintystable load

The effort to gain more than 20 samples is less effective and not necessary !!!

Page 10: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Calibration parameter + uncertainty Berlin and Graz

Same results in Graz and Berlin !!!

At least 20 samples (i.e. 4 events) :stable coefficients and uncertaintystable load

The effort to gain more than 20 samples is less effective and not necessary !!!

Page 11: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Calibration parameter + uncertainty Combination of events

Same results using combination of events:

At least 20 samples (i.e. 4 events) :stable load: 29 t stable uncertainty: 20 %

Page 12: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Calibration parameter + uncertainty Combination of events

Using Global calibration from the manufacturer:total COD load is 19 t

high underestimation of about 30%

Page 13: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

UV-VIS probes need to be calibrated to local conditions !!! • e.g. Berlin: global calibration 30% underestimation for COD load

Even with local calibration : significant uncertainties ~ 20% (conc. and load)

Good estimation of calibration parameters with more than 20 grab samples (4 events)

Effort and sampling costs to gain more than 20 samples less effective • Parameters and loads stable with an increasing number of samples !!!

Results representative of the local Berlin case study : no general rule !!!

validation of results on other case studies in progress! Berlin Graz Lyon Bogota

Conclusion

Page 14: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Thank you for your attention !

More information : [email protected]

Page 15: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

• Input data : samples = pairs (spectrometer probe values; related lab values) • Each sample belongs to an event (CSO or river impact)• Within one event : chronology of samples maintained to avoid unrealistic combinations

Generation of subsets of samples for all possible combinations of events

1. Subset creation

Page 16: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

2. Local calibration

For each subset : calibration function (linear regression) between probe and lab values.

Page 17: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Calculation of calibrated COD concentrations + total load over all the events (CSO)

3. Concentration and load calculation

COD = a1 . x + b1

COD = a14 . x + b14

Page 18: N. Caradot , H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel, A. Matzinger and P. Rouault Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin

Calculation of calibrated COD concentrations + total load over all the events (CSO)

3. Concentration and load calculation

COD = a1 . x + b1

Annual CSO Load MUncertainty U(M)

Generation of 50 random M values (Monte Carlo)- normal distribution- SD = u(M) = RMSE