Musicotheological Critique

8/10/2019 Musicotheological Critique

1/28

http://tcs.sagepub.com/

Theory, Culture & Society

http://tcs.sagepub.com/content/25/7-8/173

The online version of this article can be foundat:

DOI: 10.1177/02632764080978022008 25: 173Theory Culture Society

Catherine PickstockPostmodernism

Messiaen and Deleuze : The Musico-theological Critique of Modernism and

Published by:

http://www.sagepublications.com

On behalf of:

The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University

can be found at:Theory, Culture & SocietyAdditional services and information for

http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsEmail Alerts:

http://tcs.sagepub.com/subscriptionsSubscriptions:

http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navReprints:

http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navPermissions:

http://tcs.sagepub.com/content/25/7-8/173.refs.htmlCitations:

at SWETS WISE ONLINE CONTENT on September 3, 2010tcs.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://tcs.sagepub.com/http://tcs.sagepub.com/http://tcs.sagepub.com/http://tcs.sagepub.com/content/25/7-8/173http://tcs.sagepub.com/content/25/7-8/173http://www.sagepublications.com/http://ntu.ac.uk/research/school_research/hum/29480gp.htmlhttp://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/alertshttp://tcs.sagepub.com/subscriptionshttp://tcs.sagepub.com/subscriptionshttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navhttp://tcs.sagepub.com/content/25/7-8/173.refs.htmlhttp://tcs.sagepub.com/content/25/7-8/173.refs.htmlhttp://tcs.sagepub.com/http://tcs.sagepub.com/http://tcs.sagepub.com/http://tcs.sagepub.com/content/25/7-8/173.refs.htmlhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navhttp://tcs.sagepub.com/subscriptionshttp://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/alertshttp://ntu.ac.uk/research/school_research/hum/29480gp.htmlhttp://www.sagepublications.com/http://tcs.sagepub.com/content/25/7-8/173http://tcs.sagepub.com/


2/28

Messiaen and DeleuzeThe Musico-theological Critique of

Modernism and Postmodernism

Catherine Pickstock

Abstract

This article explores an anomaly of modern music. Music has remained more

obviously aligned with religious sensibility, practice and belief than other

modern art-forms or cultural tendencies. To understand this phenomenon

fully, it is not sufficient to see musical composition, performance and reflec-

tion as simply expressive of wider cultural and philosophical tendencies, nor

as contributing to them in its own idiom. Instead, one must see musical

composition and theory as itself, at least in the modern era, a prime mode

of philosophical reflection which possesses resources which allow it both to

take to an extreme, and yet to criticize fundamental intellectual tendencies

of our time. This criticism tends to take the form of a religious transcen-

dence of the secular, despite the fact that it is in no way shielded from the

most avant-garde influences. This is exhibited, I shall argue, in the Catholi-

cism of Olivier Messiaen and his legacy, since Messiaen was arguably the

central composer of the previous century and the one who has perhaps most

directly influenced philosophical understanding.

Key words

Deleuze music theology

THE FOLLOWING article explores a seeming anomaly of modernmusic. In ways which will be described below, music has remainedmore obviously aligned with religious sensibility, practice and even

belief than other modern art-forms or cultural tendencies. To understandthis phenomenon fully, it will be argued, it is not sufficient to see musicalcomposition, performance and reflection as simply expressive of wider

Theory, Culture & Society 2008 (SAGE, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, and Singapore),Vol. 25(78): 173199

DOI: 10.1177/0263276408097802

http://tcs.sagepub.com/http://tcs.sagepub.com/http://tcs.sagepub.com/http://tcs.sagepub.com/


3/28

cultural and philosophical tendencies, nor as contributing to them in its ownidiom. Instead, one must see musical composition and theory as itself, atleast in the modern era, a prime mode of philosophical reflection whichpossesses resources which allow it both to take to an extreme and yet to

criticize fundamental intellectual tendencies of our time. This criticismtends to take the form of a religious transcendence of the secular, despitethe fact that it is in no way shielded from the most avant-garde influences.This is exhibited, I shall argue, in the Catholicism of Olivier Messiaen andhis legacy, since Messiaen was arguably the central composer of theprevious century and the one who has perhaps most directly influencedphilosophical understanding.

In four movements I shall state the theme of the relationship betweenmusic and modernity. Then, in a first development, I shall describe

Messiaens musical and religious modernism. In a second development Ishall consider and criticize Gilles Deleuzes appropriation of Messiaen. Inthe fourth section I will conclude with a problematic recapitulation whichwill discuss the way in which Messiaens theological critique of musicalmodernisms demands elements of the postmodern which themselves,however, stand in need of a religious critique which certain recentcomposers may have already realized.

Initial Statement of Theme

One can detect an ambivalence concerning the relationship of music to theprocess of secularization (Thomas Aquinas, 1967: II-II q.91 a2 ad 3; Booth,1980). Among the arts, music appears to be perhaps especially related toreligion; many of its forms are liturgical in nature, and its ordered expressionof joy has been connected with the offering of praise. While music is alsoassociated with the work of mourning, the very conversion of sorrow intosong can seem to tilt away from the tragic towards resignation, consolationand eschatological hope. It would seem that the inherent bias of Westernmusic is towards synchronic harmony and diachronic resolution. Neverthe-

less, the wordless character of music and its relative freedom from repre-sentation can suggest also a certain urging towards a mystical, non-dogmaticreligion, or even a cult of music that might offer a substitute for a cult offaith. It can be argued that the historical periods that have seen a gradualdecline in the importance of church attendance have coincided with theemergence of the public concert, opera and ballet as quasi-sacral rites whichare neither sacral liturgical music nor occasional music, such as tafelmusikand music for dancing, nor music for private performance.

Music in the 20th century seems to sustain this double-facing.Modernism in music stems in part from the later romanticism of RichardWagner who had already distanced himself from the structures of fixed keys,and with the invention of the leitmotifallowed romantic expressivism to driftfurther away from the dominance of harmonic relation and melodic develop-ment. In Wagners operas, the intercommunication of the internal discoursesof the leitmotifs constitutes a non-dramatic subplot which is the esoteric

174 Theory, Culture & Society 25(78)



4/28

aspect of these works. Closely allied with this esoteric aspect is Wagnersdeliberate attempt to create a new secular sacrality, a celebration of thepossibility of absolute sacrificial self-commitment in erotic love: this enter-prise reaches its consummation in his opera Tristan and Isolde (Nesbitt,2004: 5476; Scruton, 2004). In general, Wagners music tends to reflectSchopenhauers notion of a pure unteleological fated process undergirdingreality and this allows a liberation of modulation from the constraints ofproportionate concordance and repeatable tune. But the leitmotif super-imposes upon this the use of a super-essential intermezzo in the form ofritornelli, little melodic and rhythmic folds which are then placed in juxta-position with one another. This seems to anticipate the modernist literaryinterest in the stream of consciousness and a world made up not simply ofa shared daytime plot, but also of multiple and only obscurely intercommu-

nicating nights of inchoate desire and dreaming.As Roger Scruton has argued, artistic modernism continued and

radicalized the Wagnerian enterprise (Scruton, 2004). On the whole, formalreligion was eschewed; yet equally disdained was the modern totalized anddesacralized world. The desire was to make of art a refuge and enclave forthe hyper-specific symbol, form or expression, whose secrecy and difficultyensured that it could not be made banal or functional by an all-devouringmarketplace. In the case of music, this process has perhaps been carriedto its furthest extent; music especially permits an extreme degree of

abstraction, obscurity and formalization. But the result of this, particularlywith the rise of total serialism after the Second World War, has been to givethe world of classical music the ethos of a small, diminishing sect, claimingto be able to hear hidden beauties to which the public ear has remainedtone-deaf.

In modern times, one could argue, music has tended to become asubstitute for religion. If, on hearing music, one is bound in some sense tointimate cosmic harmonies, then it seems nonetheless possible to halt at acertain mystical agnosticism which will not countenance doctrinal formulae

or metaphysical explanations. In accordance with this, many moderncomposers, perhaps especially British composers, have remained close toreligious practices and attitudes without espousing formal belief: VaughanWilliams, Howells, Britten, Tippett, Maxwell Davies all spring to mind.

Yet, at the same time, music remains a vehicle for the persistence ofexplicit belief and of organized religion. This is not surprising because, tothe reflective person, as the composer James MacMillan has pointed out,music presents a mystery: how is it that mathematically organized patternsof sound are capable of inspiring such great emotion, and also, as Hungarianeducational practices have tended to indicate, of stimulating intellectualinquiry (MacMillans unpublished talks and broadcasts). We are stillconfronted with the Pythagorean truth that music seems to link soul andbody, reason and the passions, the individual with society and the cosmos(Pickstock, 1998b: 24377). Any given musical tradition contains implic-itly certain views about time, space and eternity, or the emotional and the

Pickstock Messiaen and Deleuze 175



5/28

rational, and the individual and the general. Although music is withoutwords and indeed verbis defectis, musica incipit, according to the Renais-sance tag, it is itself an organized language capable of a degree of transla-tion into other aesthetic idioms and other discourses. Asked whether he was

a mystical composer, Olivier Messiaen denied this and replied that he wasa theological composer. This comment is elucidated by Messiaens otherstatement that, for him, music provides a more rather than less exactingmeans of saying things than the words of language (Darbyshire, 1998; Fabbi,1998; Hirschbaum, 1998).

For these reasons, many musicians, including many popular musi-cians, have asked what the ground of the possibility for music is, and theiranswer is often an explicitly religious one. I have already cited Britishcomposers whom one might describe as mystical agnostics, yet it is striking

that these (with the arguable exceptions of Vaughan Williams and Britten)are scarcely to be counted among the major innovators in 20th-centurymusic. By contrast, it is still more striking that among the major innovatorsone finds perhaps more instances of continued adherence to some mode ofChristianity or Judaism than in the case of any of the other arts: one canthink here of Stravinsky, Schoenberg, Messiaen, Schnittke and Ustvolskaya,and of Arvo Prt. Perhaps this is because the more self-conscious innova-tors (who are not necessarily of course thereby the best composers) are alsothose likely to inquire after the ground of possibility of music.

But this observation immediately raises the question of the relationbetween musical modernism and religion. As I have suggested, theformer is a secular movement, or rather one which is, in the long-termwake of Wagner, seeking to discover an immanent musical cult whichwill substitute for formal religion. So how can the composer ofThe Riteof Spring, so replete with the use of rhythm to establish personality,also be a loyal communicant of the Russian Orthodox Church? There issurely no easy answer to this question, but the example immediatelyindicates two sites for rendering the question a more general one: and

these are sacrifice and tempo. To a wild, frenzied beat, the peasant girldances herself to death.After Wagner, modernism was concerned with sacrifice: with sacrifice

as the primitive essence of religion in the wake of modern anthropologicaldiscoveries, and with the possibility of a purified, immanent sacrificetowards the human other, or the human community, or even to the void.These themes could be re-integrated quite easily into the framework ofChristian typology, looking toward Christs passion. The ecstasy of musiccan convey the going-beyond-oneself that such a notion requires, includingits strange fusion of the ethical demand with an extra-ethical obsession. Tolose oneself in the absolute is to lose oneself in that which exceeds theethical, especially if the absolute is an immanent law, or totality or process.The lure of eros is, for the modern artist, just a given, as is the successionof time or the social totality. To lose oneself in these things is to surrenderto an extra-human rhythm, which pulses through the subconscious but




6/28

expresses the natural in an aleatory mode which is more fundamental thananything that can be explored by natural science.

With respect to both sacrifice and tempo, music reveals itself to beperhaps the most central modernist art. It is best able to express self-

abandonment to immanent mystery, and to a time that is more fundamentalthan the time that we can measure. Most forms of modernism were in oneway or another influenced by Henri Bergsons philosophy which hinged uponthis distinction. For Bergson, a creative and spontaneous lan vital sustainsnature at a level prior to the emergence of the regular and spatializedprocesses which science can formulate as law. For the human being, thismore fundamental process rises to the surface of full consciousness andallows a super-rational experience of time as properly dure, in which past,present and future are intensively fused, with a bias towards future creative

action, rather than laid out as externally separate moments, according to aspatial model (Bergson, 1983: 186272). It is obvious that music wouldseem to be the art which can most naturally express pure duration.

And something like the attempt to do just that was present inmusical modernism after Schoenberg, Berg and others. Traditionaldiatonic music was seen as spatialized music; musical flow wassubordinate to vertical harmonies, fixed harmonic ratios, static scalarrelations, and formal regular metric patternings and predictable continuaof speed and dynamic. Beyond Wagner, the modernist revolutionaries

undertook to set free a process of continuous variation for which thereare no fixed tones and no fixed relations, but instead a pure becomingthat is never for a single instant self-identical. With explicit reference ornot, this was seen as akin to the absolute heterogeneity of Bergsons dureand Husserls expression of ecstatic temporality, radicalized by Heidegger(probably in Bergsons wake) into an identity with Being as such. In thelatter case, one is removed both from punctuality and from relation; asingular but self-differentiating process. The radical subjectivity of thisprocess indicates also a development of romanticism, but in the direction

of subjective forces which exceed us from within. This lineage is relevantto the musical world also.The new interest in technique was subordinate to expressivist aims.

One can see this above all with the idea of the 12-tone scale, or tone-row.The goal here is to complete the work of equal-tempering by producing ascale taken from the traditional octave (itself the child of the yoking-togetherof two Greek tetrachords comprising two single intervals and one halfinterval), but purged of any inequalities or supposed colourings of differentkeys. This results in 12 equal half intervals with no tonics or dominants: nohome-base, no middle and no upper note which recapitulates the originalbase. This allows the composer to impose his own unique expressive hier-archy and also ideally permits an escape from all-too-totalizing notions ofthematic development and final resolution. Beyond the modalism of Debussyand Ravel (historicized and re-romanticized by Vaughan Williams and sore-emplotted with a great originality which now seems more postmodern




7/28

than nostalgic), music could now become impressionistic, but, beyondDebussy, impressioned of or by itself and not anything else, and wanderingin its own virtual space without either development or return.

One can observe two paradoxes. Despite the Bergsonist aim to liberate

music from spatialization, time as narrative here disappears. In the firstplace, continuous variation, for which the variation of the original is in thecondition of always already, is a kind of simultaneity, and so seeminglyspatial after all. Second, time as memory also disappears, as Pierre Boulezindicates: in a piece without development of a theme but only ceaselessjuxtaposition and surprise, both the composer and the listener must continu-ously forget what has come before (Boulez, 1966, 1974). Yet both are strictlyimpossible: one has to hear music in laid-out measured time, and indeedmusic is, as Messiaen put it, a kind of geometry of time. The most extreme

modernist experimenters after the Second World War, such as IannisXenakis, sought to deploy theglissando in place of isolatable notes, yet evenhere one has to hear to some degree a first and then what succeeds it. The

glissando has a narrative aspect. What comes later may be in some sensethe same as what came earlier, yet for our hearing, it is also different andso is in relation to a precedent (Xenakis, 2001a, 2001b). Pure self-differentiation is simply not hearable, just as pure juxtaposition would bemerely noise and not music. So, paradoxically, the absence of totality orideality can only exist in the idea and not in the reality of music. In this

way, the endeavour to remove theme, development, measurable metre andharmony is an impossible one. The modernist enterprise was often self-consciously stochastic: gesturing negatively towards the sublimity ofdurebeyond the bounds of musical reason. The 12-tone scale was in this respectlike the boundary of musical finitude; although it held out the prospect ofrelease from the diatonic octave, it also bound one within it, since it is theabstraction of the purest degree of chromaticism which the octave pre-contains. For this reason, an in some ways postmodern philosopher suchas Gilles Deleuze argued that tonic experimenters such as Bla Bartk

were more successful in creating something drastically new whichgenuinely broke with the bounds of previous convention (Deleuze andGuattari, 1987: 34950).

Does this mean that musical modernism was inherently secular andimmanentist? Not necessarily. Schoenberg came to see the tone-row in aneo-Pythagorean or Cabbalistic way, as the natural, divinely ordainedgrammar of music and the cosmos. Nevertheless, one could see this as acharacteristically modern Jewish embrace of a Kantian position, followingmy interpretation of the tone-row just enunciated. The supposed finallyidentified bounds of finitude are identified with the laws of God. Theygesture, negatively, to the unrepresentable infinite and even intimate it asa glimpsed chasm, yet they are unable to mediate this infinite to us.

Nevertheless, the example of Schoenberg, like that of Stravinsky(whose innovations were more percussive in character), shows that themodernist re-invention of the sacred in art as secret, subjective, temporal




8/28

and sacrificial could readily be deployed as a new means to safeguard andconvey more traditional religious belief: examples of this in the literary fieldwould include T.S. Eliot, W.H. Auden and David Jones. For the latter, onefinds a fusion of modernism with elements of Thomism. And a similar fusion

applies also in the case of the composer Olivier Messiaen.Messiaen is central to the topic of musical modernism, because it was

his compositional and theoretical work that foreshadowed the total serial-ism of the post-war period, when the serial principle of de-hierarchizationwas applied not just to pitch, but to the other elements of musical compo-sition: rhythm, dynamic, colour, intensity, attack, duration, polytonality andso forth. And yet, Messiaen himself developed a musical theology which wasby no means Kantian in character, and arguably dealt with the stochasticyearning in a different fashion, just as his music was never predominantly

atonal. Moreover, while he helped to found the Darmstadt group alongwith Stockhausen and his own pupils Boulez and Xenakis in the 1950s,he eventually broke with its total serialism in a way that perhaps hassome connection with musical postmodernism (Bruhn, 1998; Matheson,1995).

If Messiaen is the pivotal figure in 20th-century music and also themost explicitly theological, then his work merits some examination, beforewe ask what is musical postmodernism, and how does it relate tomodernism and to religion?

Development 1

For Messiaen, the relation of musical modernism to Bergson is clearly setforth at the outset of his multi-volume musical notebooks. Music is to dowith dure, the dimension of continuous variation which is primordiallyheterogeneous and subjective. Rhythm, as opposed to measured metre, isdefined by just these properties; it is la succession de mmes qui sonttoujours autres . . . et dautres qui ont toujours quelques parents avec lameme: cest la variation perpetuelle (Messiaen, 1994: 39). This, according

to Messiaen, is better recognized in oriental than Western music. Hindurhythm is more complex than classical Western rhythm, while Chinesecomposers have attended to another factor outside the melodic and theharmonic: resonance or intensity, as shown in their use of clangour and thelingering of sounded bells. Properly speaking, Messiaen alleges, horizontalmelody reduces to rhythmic interval in such a way that pitch and tone shouldbe considered to be less essentially musical elements of added colour.They belong inherently to the vertical scale of harmony, which melodysimply runs through in temporal sequence. (Here, one might ask, can therealso be rhythms of space?) (Messiaen, 1995: 752; Scholl in Samuel, 1967:928).

In attributing pitch more to the harmonic side, Messiaen sounds as ifhe were aligning himself within the French tradition of Rameau rather thanRousseau, but, on the other hand, he gives a Rousseau-like priority tomonodic melody re-construed as rhythm, just as, modifying Rameau, the




9/28

classical composers Haydn and Mozart gave a new role to the horizontaltemporal line of music by a newly complex interest in the percussive(Pickstock, 1998b).

Nevertheless, there are at least two significant ways in which Messiaen

departs from this orientalist-Bergsonism, both of them suggestive of aspecifically Catholic theological perspective. First, Messiaen denies thatdure can, as Bergson supposed, be an immediate given of conscious-ness and the object of a pure intuition. Rather, duration or perpetualvariation is something that we only have access to through bodily andsensory experience and through sound itself. But sound, which mediatesto us duration, is also and equally the point where duration is inter-woven with measured and spatialized time. In this way, in effect,Messiaen was able to accept a post-Einsteinian time-space relativity

which Bergson sought to refuse or at least to transcend. The composer,therefore, was less dualistic than the philosopher (Messiaen, 1995: 9).This connects directly with the composers belief in a transcendent creatorGod. For Messiaen, even mundane measured time remotely echoeseternity, while duration echoes eternity to a still higher degree. However,it does not fully attain to its pure simultaneity, and duration as subjec-tive memory still properly refers to a real external past and future eventhough it re-imagines the former and actively anticipates the latter.

Messiaen grasps this in terms of a musical angle upon the Thomistic

real distinction between being and essence, which suggests that his musicalcomposition and theoretical reflection sit easily within the central 20th-century philosophical debate concerning Being, life, time and symbolicexpression, which concerned not just Bergson and Heidegger, but also theThomists, Etienne Gilson and Jacques Maritain.

Just as, in ontological terms, for Thomas, esse and essentia are distin-guished for human beings but coincide in God, so also, as Messiaen pointsout, for Thomas, creatures are in time and yet do not coincide with time,whereas God simply is His own eternity (1995: 7). The vanishing-away of

external time reveals that creatures entangled in time are also somethingelse which points toward the eternal, while the subjective human beingremains in excess of memory and projection. Even angels live in a non-passing duration or aevum; and even with this they do not perfectly coincide.Their personality escapes their created remaining, and here one has anangelogical refutation of Bergsons impersonalism for which the self is lostin ineffable heterogeneity. All this is expressed in Messiaens music: thecosmic time of rocks, the biological time of birds, the human time of memory,contemplation and eschatological expectation, the pure remaining of theangels. And all these things, by analogy, build up to the impossibleexpression of an eternal music which would represent only itself, as at theend ofclairs sur lAu Dela (Messiaen, 1994). This latter would seem to bean aim of all musical modernism, but it is notable that Messiaen seemsalways to insist that finite music is programmatic, inevitably and properlyevocative, for reasons that we shall presently see.




10/28

In the second place, Messiaen does not really subordinate theharmonic to the melodic, taken as primarily rhythm, which he defines ascontinuous variation. In the end, as later in the case of Boulez, he isconcerned with the mysterious diagonal which one hears between the

horizontal and vertical coordinates (Boulez, 1968: 2312, 295301,3823, 1971: 559; Deleuze, 1993: 12137; Deleuze and Guattari, 1987:297; Fabbi, 1998). Exploration of this diagonal or transversal is reallyproper to Western music alone, in the traditions of polyphony, counter-point, use of the ostinato bass and so forth. And such free-floating obliq-uity was only permitted by the stress upon punctual notes, pauses andstrict selection of modes or scales. This abstract simplification, ascompared with certain Eastern traditions, was the necessary preconditionfor a new complexification (and the same sequence holds good for serial-

ism) (Pickstock, 1998b).Nevertheless, Messiaen thought about the diagonal in a peculiar way,

influenced by his possession of a physiological condition which permitteda constant experience of synaesthesia: he heard sounds as colours. Or rather,it is more proper to say that he heard sequences of sounds as equivalent toa kaleidoscopic or cinematic transmutation of colour. The mere seeing of anisolated sound as an isolated colour is characteristic rather of a drug-induced psychedelic experience (Samuel, 1967: 4156).

While, for Messiaen, horizontal rhythm in time is the properly musical

factor, nevertheless the extra of colouration is not extrinsic and thissuggests that music always invokes the spatial domain; hence the dizzyinggeographical expansiveness of Messiaens music, as well as its exotic andvaried colouration. Nevertheless, just as Messiaen peculiarly sees melodyas rhythm, so also he peculiarly sees harmony as arising from colour andintensity (Messiaen, 1995: 752).

For this reason, Messiaen undertook to extend the Western rationaliz-ation of music, in order to permit a new complexity and operation of creativespontaneity. Alongside scales of pitches, he created scales of duration (not

simply tempi but scales of variation of tempi), of colour, of intensity,dynamic and attack. This allowed him to add to his music polyrhythm andpolycolouration as well as polyphony. For example, Messiaens music ofteninvolves the coordination of several different speeds and volumes runningalongside one another.

Beyond this, however, Messiaens commitment to original hetero-geneity (or perpetual variation, akin to Derridas diffrance) encouraged himto accentuate tendencies within Baroque music in developing simultaneousand concurrent polyphonies, where it seemed as if disparate pieces of musicwere running at the same time; a polyphony of polyphonies, as Boulez putit, and polyrhythm of polyrhythms, and so forth.

Messiaen was a radical composer in the most literal sense. He soughtto conjugate the most disparate and newly invented forces. Like manyBergsonist modernists, he saw his art as a kind of higher scientific experi-ment which captured and exhibited through original exemplification the




11/28

ultimate vital cosmic forces. However, for Messiaen, the possibility of thissurprising holding-together lay in the coincidence of beauty with eternityand infinity in God. Because this is reflected in the created order, the cosmichymn can be revealed and created ever-anew.

But how does this stand in relation to musical modernism in general?For Messiaen, the release of a flattened chromaticism was not the crucialthing. Rather, as for Igor Stravinsky, it was the insistence upon rhythm asnon-identical repetition. Yet, whereas the other modernists tended to gesturetowards the impossibility of pure heterogeneity, Messiaen saw that it wasalways mediated through, and not contradicted by, selected regular formalpatterns (identical repetitions) of various sorts. Surprising variations onthese could then point towards the Triune God in whom variation is absoluteand yet self-identical. Messiaen was a supreme innovator in that he sought

to give an enhanced role to neglected musical elements, which he nonethe-less subjected, in a craftsmanlike and indeed scholastic manner, to the sortof rules and norms which, earlier in Western musical history, had beenapplied to melody and harmony.

In parallel with this approach, Messiaen held back from serialism withregard to pitch. He broke with the diatonic scale, but did so through a selec-tion of certain modes and fixed rules for modal transposition, similar to, butnot coincident with, those of Gregorian chant. This can be seen as relativelyconservative, although there is a complicating factor. Serialism in a sense

only further extends the rationalization carried out by equal temperamentin the 18th century (Isacoff, 2003). Its release of random chromatic slidesfurther excludes the sense of intrinsic mood or colour proper to modal music,which still survived somewhat in the Baroque era, even in Bach, whoprobably favoured well rather than equal tempering. By comparisonwith other modernists, Messiaen returned rather to the predilections ofGregorian chant which prior to the Cistercian reform which took Westernmusic on the road to strictly related keys by forbidding modal trans-positions not only embraced modes of different prevailing mood, but also

allowed complex slides from one mode/mood to another under certain rules(Nesbitt, 2004: 60). In this way, Messiaens Thomistic modifications ofBergsons approach to time concur with his conservative revolutionism inmusic, his radical orthodoxy. (Curiously, it might seem, he did not invokeAugustine, but this was not unusual for French Catholic thought during thisepoch.)

And yet it was Messiaen who paved the way for the most drasticserialism of all. His pupils, Boulez and Xenakis, along with Stockhausenand Berio, undertook to apply serial principles to all aspects of music,including those which Messiaen had newly brought to the fore. If Messiaenresisted this, then this was because, in the case of every variable, as withpitch, he did not choose to adopt serial parameters, but rather modal orquasi-modal ones. What was really at issue here?

Messiaens pupils sought a purely self-referential, entirely musicalmusic. The criteria for what was to be selected had to be internal to musical




12/28

considerations rather than programmatic, representative and social or evenemotional and subjective. A series simply offered a neutral repertoire ormathesis from which one could select a way or ways of organizing this series,as in mathematical set theory. But what dictates the choice? Purely formal

considerations? Why go one way rather than another? Even mathematicianshave to start talking about intrinsic beauty at this point and, in Xenakisthesis defence, Messiaen asked where love entered into the business ofselection. Interestingly, Xenakis was prepared to talk about revelationhere, but the question for Messiaen seemed to be whether there can be, asfor Xenakis, a clear distinction between pure mathematical technique, onthe one hand, and the mysterious intervention of revelation, on the other.This is the point at which John Cage was only prepared to talk aboutchance. But for Messiaen there is no such technique/love duality; rather,

it would seem, Messiaen saw his selection of formal rules and the creativeoperation of these rules as guided by love or by revelation (Xenakis, 1985:2747; Samuel, 1967: 6179).

And this fits with his preference for mode over series. Messiaens baseis not a flat, smooth, nomadic space but rather a pre-selection of somethingwith a certain colour, a certain mood, tendency, hierarchical bias or tilt. Isthis then a preference for the striated, fixed and arboreal to the labyrinthinevegetation of the rhizomatic in Deleuzes reworked Bergsonist terms? Notentirely, because for Messiaen each modal tree is constantly being

qualified by intertwining with other modal trees. By contrast, Xenakis isprepared to release total dissonance in every musical domain, in such away that there are no more hierarchical biases towards base notes, themes,developments, resolutions, harmonies and so forth. However, he can onlydo this by beginning with the arbitrary decision to prefer the Cartesian spaceof serial regularity, which is picked out just because it accords with a moodof cold neutrality. In fact, a more iron rule has been selected here than thosewhich apply to the diatonic scale, and, as Deleuze himself indicates, thispremature attempt to seize absolute de-territorialization can result in a

spiralling down a black hole of complete non-musicality, following a failedpremature line of flight which seeks to escape all determination once andfor all.

Any actual surviving music will always gesture towards the variousidioms of hierarchization. Xenakis can only avoid a black hole by admit-ting to the moment of revelation. But if in composing together disparateelements, one sees the way one should go, then this is tantamount to glimps-ing a new and unexpected moment of harmony. And there is indeed nothingwrong with deployment of the serial principle (as sometimes undertaken byMessiaen himself, implicitly) in order to permit a freer sort of chromatictransition. Yet if one permits revelation to supervene upon seriality in theprocess of composition, why should it not intervene in the form of a priorselection of modes and favoured sorts of transposition that are more intrin-sically coloured (as the word chromatic indicates)? The latter allows oneto see that creativity has a social and traditioned dimension, which is indeed




13/28

another aspect of modernism as such (in the case of Ezra Pound and T.S.Eliot, for example).

It was said above that musical modernism tends to suppress develop-ment, resolution and memory. In the case of Boulezs workPli selon Pli, thismeans that the music endlessly unfolds towards further and further horizonsin such a way that the music advances no closer to an arrival and does notreturn upon itself. And yet in reality, in listening to this (very beautiful)piece of music, one cannot help hearing endless semi-arrivals and endlesssemi-returns (Boulez, 2002). The constant frustration of these, and revela-tion of yet another turn in the non-plot, is indeed delightful, and yet theconstant drive to undo, not to arrive and not to return, means that one feelsthat anti-music has the last word. Irony triumphs: there may be music withinnon-music, but the whole piece seems not to be music; in which case it falls

apart and its elements seem arbitrary and non-revealed or non-loved.Despite all the beauty, it is ultimately more barrage than beauty, evenallowing for a trained ear. And I am not arguing against formal complexityhere: modernist music is far more listenable to than is usually allowed anddenial of this is somewhat to the disgrace of populist culture, not to that ofskilful composers. But if, all the same, more barrage than beauty, why thisbarrage? There seems no reason to compose what is not a composition. Butif there is more beauty than barrage, as with Messiaen, then one has an affir-mation that beauty must be infinite (Hart, 2003).

To go on composing outside the rules requires one to be theological.And this becomes much more evident when one considers avant-gardemusic, such as that of Messiaen and his pupils, than it does when oneconsiders more strictly modernist music that remains within the compass ofrules. In the latter case one can, as it were, nostalgically feign faith.

Exactly how does Messiaens music endlessly expand toward thecosmos and yet also intimate an infinite order rather than infinite chaos?One important consideration here is that order in some sense implies circu-larity; it implies that one can return on a course taken because there is a

perceptible sequence. If the sequence is not yet complete, one can onlyknow that there is a final order because this incomplete sequence intimatesan infinite and complete one. To favour non-return, like Boulez, is perhapstoo arbitrary a choice for a meaningless cosmos, a denial that patterns whichone can intimate betoken a final patterning. To resist memory, recapitula-tion, harmony (even of the discordant) and reversal is in effect to resist, forno musical or other reason, the lure of God, and to resist music itself.

Messiaen, by contrast, deploys three devices which intimate return,and so order (Darbyshire, 1998; Fabbi, 1998; Messiaen, 1995, vol. 3:3523; Samuel, 1967). The first of these has already been discussed: it ismodes of limited transposition. The second is non-retrogradable rhythm.This concerns the following paradox. If one takes the series 1,2,3,4 andreverses it as4,3,2,1, then the reversal has made it symmetrically different:a mirror image. Such a series is subject to retrogradation and it is easy toenvisage musical equivalents. But take instead the series 1,2,1. Reversed,




14/28

this is still 1,2,1, and therefore it is said to be non-retrogradable despiteits perfect symmetrical reversibility.

Messiaen makes use of such non-retrogradable rhythms, which canalso be described as palindromes; for example: crotchet, dotted crotchet,

crotchet. For him, the significance of such a rhythm is that its reversiblesymmetry, which could be seen as its absolute retrogradabality, is anexample of time collapsing inwards towards eternity. For where memorymakes projection precisely equivalent to memory, one has an image of timeas present itself sandwiched between the same eternity coming before andafter time. Yet because the palindrome is non-retrogradable, it cannotreally be reversed, and therefore stands also for the pure forward-movingevent. So here, time as dure, time in its most intimate fusion of past, presentand future, remains at once the creative forward-pressing pure event and

yet as such the very thing which points to timelessness. But, in contrast toBergson, as we have seen, Messiaen saw the rhythmic patterning of time asmusic as central to the realization of dure itself.

Messiaen deployed this device with a further twist. If one reverses aretrogradable series as follows: 1,2,3,4,4,3,2,1, then the whole unit of eightelements is itself non-retrogradable or palindromic. In Les Corps glorieux,Messiaen uses this device to suggest the raising up of temporal bodies tothe winged character of angels at the resurrection. Here and elsewhere heemploys this device to represent the substantive relations of the Trinity: the

Son in receiving all of the Father reverses him to form one symmetricaland non-reversible event which the Holy Spirit can only affirm and offer. Inthis way, Messiaens music hopes to fulfil the prayer enfoncez votre imagedans la dure de mes jours (cited by Fabbi, 1998: 80).

His third technique is another way of trying to achieve this same goal.This is symmetrical permutation or interversion. Whereas the first tech-nique is applied to pitch and the second to rhythm, this third techniquebecomes a parameter for all the musical variables, although especially forthe unit Messiaen called neume, which means something like a melody of

indeterminate rhythm. Using this technique, one modulates from onesequence to another and then to the next one, by way of a strictly propor-tionate analogy that folds the first sequence inside out and then the secondsequence likewise, and so forth. It is like a constant emerging of butterfliesfrom their chrysales, and can be numerically exemplified as follows:

1 2 3 4

3 2 4 1

4 2 1 3

1 2 3 4

In every case, one follows the rule: commence the next sequence with thethird element of the first; then take the second element, then the fourth andthen the first. Finally, though, the inside becomes the original outside again,




15/28

and once more the whole four-element unit constitutes a pure event that, inits circularity, nonetheless ascends with symmetrical wings towards eternity.Messiaen described this way of transposing as like the constant opening andshutting again of fans by a woman.

It should be mentioned that Messiaen was by no means the firstChristian composer to deploy modes of retrograde motion for theologicalpurposes. In mediaeval music such involutions were used to convey a senseof the world as a labyrinth into which the warrior Christ enters, constantlygoing back upon the traces of human sin in order harmonically to redeemthem. This amounted to a musical presentation of the Irenaean notion ofrecapitulation (Wright, 2001). Moreover, for Messaien and the tradition,these palindromic devices were associated with magical conjuring formulae,and Messiaen spoke of a good magic that concerns the ability of music to

invoke the cosmos in a new way and to evoke and alter human emotion. Hisfree deployment of technical devices to these ends can indeed be seen, inthe proper sense that is not mechanical, manipulatory or sinister, astheurgic in character (Samuel, 1967: 44, there exists a good magic . . .).

Messiaen achieved magical effects by deploying all three of theformal techniques in conjunction and particularly by blending harmonicvertical palindromic sequences with neumic horizontal ones, often in sucha way that a relative emphasis on one or the other itself took the form ofan alternation between opening the fan on the melodic plane and shutting

the fan on the harmonic plane. In the between of the motion of this four-dimensional fan (operating in space-time) one hears or sometimes almosthears, on the diagonal, something that is impossible mathematically toformulate, but yet something not simply stochastically reached out for;rather, it is as if something miraculously descends into time as an echo ofthe Incarnation, which Messiaen ceaselessly sought to present in hismusic.

In this way, Messiaens Thomistic Bergsonism overcame the puristKantianism of musical modernism which operated within the boundaries

of strict musical parameters and to this degree anticipated the postmodern,as indicated also by his non-abandonment of a dominant modal tonality andthe finality of at least a relative harmony. In affirming by faith the infinitebeauty and so compose-ability of the cosmos, Messiaen had to deny thatbeing is the violence of forgetting, or constant leaving-behind of that whichcannot be blended with what is to come. On the contrary, if there is beautyand order, then even the non-identically repeated must be beautiful inreverse, thereby constituting the palindromic sequence which can onlyhappen once (1,2,1) and in moving backwards still moves forwards, butjust in this respect as pure event is also reversible and so intimates eternitybeyond time.

Messiaens blending of the thematic of difference or continuouspermutation with a Thomistic metaphysics of eternity and time, whichdoubles the ontology of the real distinction, also suggests a postmodernelement in his Catholic reflection that is absent from Gilson and Maritain




16/28

(except for the latters reflections on the sign). Although this thematic wasBergsonist and therefore in reality lay at the heart of modernism itself,Messiaen already gave it a postmodern twist by insisting that dure ismediated through spatial placement. Later officially postmodern phil-

osophy and art, however, have tended to view such mediation as an aporeticobscuration of that dure which it nonetheless discloses in its own inevi-table self-deconstruction. In this way, the sublimity of Bergsonist durationis newly sustained as continuous tensional violence. By contrast, Messiaensmusical presentation of difference as beauty through the deployment ofdevices of return is an argument for the harmony between eternity and timethat distances itself more emphatically from the stochastic negativity of thepure modernists. In a certain sense, Messiaen was already more postmodernthan the postmodernists, even if this verdict is somewhat problematic, as

we shall later see.

Development 2

In A Thousand Plateaux by Gilles Deleuze and Flix Guattari, OlivierMessiaen is alluded to at a crucial juncture, On the Refrain, the ritour-nelle (Deleuze and Guattari, 1987: 296350). The authors are concernedwith Messiaens deployment of birdsong. They agree with the composer thatsome birds are musicians: their music exceeds any possible functionalpurpose. Art, it seems, begins in the animal kingdom and even religion

likewise: turtles go on mysterious pilgrimages back to ancestral sources;birds in Africa arrive for periodic solemn assemblages; many animals seethe centre of their terrain as lying totemically outside the functional terrainitself. Deleuze and Guattari explain these curious practices ontologically, interms of the character of assembling or territorializing that is peculiar tolife itself and even to a vital urging that precedes what we take to be theorganic domain. Besides genetic coding, biologists observe the duplicationof genes and chromosomes whose genetic redundancy offers a free matterfor variation. In interaction with the environment, this allows a certain

decoding to arise, or the relative separation of an individual component fromthe coded sequence of the genetic stratum. This occurs at every level, microand macro, but at the macro level it occurs as the emergence of animalterritoriality for certain species. So territoriality begins with free creativeexpression: although territory serves functions, this is secondary to theoriginal expressive assertion of individual identity; thus many species arecontentedly nomadic, and, while territory secures food, this is just onepossible way of finding nourishment, just as some human beings are farmerswhile others are nomads and hunter gatherers. Animals have differentcultures, and territorial animals develop cultured settlement more intensely.

From this perspective, the birds ritournelle (ritornello) not onlydefends a terrain, it also establishes continuously the terrain by encirclingit with song. It is the birds song of the earth, linking place and colour withsound, weaving together ornamented terrain (patterns of leaves, etc.) withornamented rhythm. The ritournelle is simultaneously pure expression and




17/28

a returning fold that wards off death and other threats, and becomes alsoa song of courtship, already functioning like the leitmotifs of Tristan andIsolde (who were important, together with the natural realm and the CatholicChurch, for Messiaen). For Deleuze, human music also begins fundamen-

tally as the ritournelle, the little theme or intermezzo, which is the folk-song linked to territory or the song children and women (especially) hum tothemselves to ward off adult and male danger. It is a fragile charmedprotective enclosure.

In connection with this refrain, Deleuze and Guattari, and Deleuzealone elsewhere, offer a typological history of music. The classical legacyof Western music is characterized by a kind of disdain for the folk territoryand is instead aligned with the coded strata of physical reality where, inAristotelian terms, form is imposed on matter to produce regular substances

and essences, subject to fixed codes. Thus in classical Western music,regular modes and keys are favoured and harmony dominates melodic flow,even if the music is monodic. It is true that polyphony starts to introduce adiagonal which potentially allows escape from the arboreal square markedout by the coordinates of melody and harmony. However, polyphony worksby constantly forming knots as in a kind of weaving, charting the exactpoints where vertical and horizontal lines intersect. By contrast, it isBaroque music which really liberates the diagonal, and for Deleuze, as forother thinkers, the Baroque era retains a kind of exemplarity in the history

of music.The reason for this is that Baroque music exhibits a delicate balance:after Monteverdi, it tries to set free monody with the use of broken chordsand increasingly simultaneous ones in a proto-classical manner, yet it alsoplaces a new stress on pure simultaneous harmony. The effect of doing thisis not, especially in the slightly archaic 17th- and 18th-century practitionerssuch as Purcell, Biber and J.S. Bach, to lose the diagonal, but rather toaccentuate it. For polyphony, the weaving tends to produce a diagonalwhich simply coordinates the horizontal and the vertical, or fuses them into

a regular staircase that climbs at once along and upwards, leaving one lessaware of independent horizontal and vertical lines. It is like the case of arelation becoming substantialized because it embodies the poles of therelata. In Baroque music, by contrast, a kind of positive dialectics is at work:because monody and pure harmony receive relatively greater emphasis, thediagonal dimension itself becomes more elusive, flowing and mysterious andits diagonal tends to break free from its containing vertical plus horizontalframe, so ecstatically aspiring both forwards and upwards. The staircasebecomes an escalator, one might say, or a flowing fountain which one canmiraculously ascend; what Messiaen called the rainbow ladder of the truth(Fabbi, 1998: 80). A similar point applies to Baroque visual art: the paintingoverflows the frame and curves round to shape the interior of a building oreven the building itself (Maravall, 1986).

An enhanced diagonal dimension is ensured in Baroque music by theuse of the ground bass rather than equal contrapuntal lines. This allows




18/28

the melody to float freely above the ground and yet still to be diagonallycoordinated with it. Above the ground, a continued deployment of counter-point and fugal themes plus broken chords has a similar effect. In bothcases, a simple Renaissance weaving is avoided through the use of synco-

pated delay, complex (and freely improvised) appogiatura andstretti (wheresubject and answer in a fugue are made to sound together). One result ofthis is a continuous sounding of the slightly discordant. And sometimes, asin the Bohemian composer Jan Dismas Zelenka, one line will return to itselfin a movement of resolution, while another line continues to spiral away,with the effect that the resolution sounds somewhat obsessive, temporaryand unachieved (Zelenka, 1973). In these sorts of phenomena, Deleuze seesa Baroque anticipation of modernism.

Use of delay, broken chords and appogiatura means that one no longer

has a Gothic polyphonic music of tracked and coincident relations. Instead,one has the sense of a continuous complex flow which constantly redoublesin multiple ritornelli and semi-glissandi. There appears to be one dynamicmovement which at once moves forwards and triumphantly ascends. Yet,equally, the diverse components vertical, horizontal, diagonal, plus thecontrast of the continuo group and the main body of players, or the use ofdouble choirs on either side of an altar or platform have a tendency toform monadic blocks where the folds contain windowless units which gotheir own ways. If they do coordinate with other blocks, then this seems to

be the result of a pre-established composed harmony, a hidden transcen-dent controlling movement. This allows Deleuze to argue that Baroquemusic is Leibnizian. He argues that the bass continuo plays the role of theLeibnizianvinculum, where small local groups of monads are bound togetheron the surface and not simply behind the scenes (Deleuze, 1993).

According to this view, Baroque music prefigures Bergsonist imma-nentism for which there are no relations, only a single self-differentiatingprocess and the various spatialized effects it throws off. The latter onlyappear to exhibit relations and inter-representations. In reality, the spatial

units do not communicate with one another and are only secondary effectsof self-differentiation. In his book on Leibniz, The Fold, Deleuze argues(with reference to Whitehead) that while, for modernism, monads are nolonger discrete, but indeterminately fold into each other through prehen-sion, they nonetheless remain windowless (Deleuze, 1993: 7682). Itfollows that for Deleuzes Bergsonism, there is still a pre-establishedharmony or perhaps disharmony: entirely disparate units of music, or ofmusical being (for this is a musical ontology), including as for Messiaenand Boulez units of self-contained polyphony, are conjoined by virtual life,and not through their own inherently negotiated affinities.

In Deleuzes musical metanarrative, the Baroque can always lapseinto classicism, where it loses the diagonal line of flight, but starts re-accentuating the rhythmic (as in the subtly percussive Haydn, Mozart andthe Brazilian classical composer, Jos Mauricio Nunes Garcia, who looksback to the Renaissance and the Baroque and forwards to jazz, arguably a




19/28

Latin derivation, with long-term Baroque roots) (Garcia, 1999). Then it canreappear again, as with Berlioz, who is perhaps as much neo-Baroque as heis romantic. But the new accentuation of the horizontal leads to the romanticstress upon the expressive power of the melodic which sings the dark song

of the earth, of terrain, and later of a people so intensively that it threat-ens to become de-territorialized since the decoding aspect of terrainmeans, for Deleuze, that it paradoxically depends upon the virtual force ofde-territorialization.

Classical music is, for Deleuze, the music of formally organized stratawhich had started to dissolve towards ecstasy with the Baroque. Romanticmusic is that of the decoded terrain. Modernist music is the music of theliberated Baroque, which leaves both strata and terrain for the non-home ofthe cosmos, whether we are concerned with experimental tonality or atonal-

ity; this suggests that we are perhaps concerned with the postmodern as wellas the modern. In this music, all multiplicity and dissonance are released.Yet, at the same time, for Deleuze, the possibility of composition (and thisrelates to the Xenakis problematic mentioned earlier) requires that one notdesert strata and terrain altogether. This includes a certain embrace of thestill-Baroque programmatic element which one finds in Messiaen: not somuch a representation of canyons, birds, the infant Jesus and so forth, buta certain becoming of these things, as Deleuze puts it, in a way that mightbe considered consonant (even if Deleuze did not see it this way) with the

Thomistic idea that to know a thing is not to mirror its form but further todevelop and realize that form in ones mind. Deleuze is aware that thepossibility of such a programmatic element concerns the synaesthesicdimension and the mysterious passing of one mode of sensation into another,which exhibits their shared mediation of vital forces.

So whereas modernist Bergsonism aspired towards an impossibleregulative pure self-differentiation of the lan vital, Deleuzes postmoderntwist suggests that the absolute, which he sometimes terms a life or theplane of immanence, is only there in its involvement in various modes of

re-territorialization (Deleuze, 2001: 2533).But is this really music? Is it what one hears in Messiaen? Notaccording to Messiaens own self-theorization, and not necessarily inhearing his music for oneself either. On Deleuzes view, the compositionof diverse forces, which he admirably upholds as an ideal, can only infact mean a continuous uncomposed and imminently dissolving tensionbetween the pull towards territory, on the one hand, and the urge towardspure self-differentiation, the glissando of continuous variation, on theother. Modernist Kantian regulation by the unachievable sublime is stillpresent, as I indicated above, but in the mode of a constant unstableachievement of this non-achievement. So the holding-together, the compo-sition, cannot be a genuine balance even to any degree. It cannot be music,even if it traverses musical moments. Deleuzes chaosmos cannot amountto a musical cosmos even though he wishes it to do so. This is because itcontains no finality of relation, but only a tension between the pure One




20/28

(of self-differentiation), which is not there of itself, and territorial differ-ences which both express and deny this Unity. For the same reason, thereis no analogy between these disparate musical units, in the sense of anobscure affinity that is revealed to the composer or the listener.

And what justified Deleuzes view that the more extreme Baroque ofmodernism is really beyond the Baroque? Nothing at all, since Messiaenscosmic affirmation of transcendence and extreme programmaticism isperhaps to be seen as a kind of hyper-Baroque (though also hyper-classical, as complexly percussive, and hyper-romantic, as freely expres-sive of nature). To go beyond the Baroque, one has to deny that the musicalprocess amounts to return and to claim that the ritornello is left behind,or rather that one should gesture towards such an impossible escape.However, one can only do so by contradictorily proposing a nihilistic

version of return after Nietzsche as the identical return of the aleatory,even if this is the return of the non-reactive (as in Deleuzes debatablerendering). Hence, for Deleuze, the line of flight will vanish into a fascisticblack hole if it does not constantly return to its ground bass in territory:final escape always proves to be premature. Inversely, territory mustconstantly re-embark on the diagonal line of flight. In this way nihilisticpiety is still, in Messiaens terms, confined within retrograde motion.Moreover, Deleuzes Bergsonist idea of the ultimate virtual (before theactual/possible doublet) comprises the idea that this is only realized through

the double articulation of material content, on the one hand, and mentalexpression, on the other. The emptiness of the absolute is confirmed by theinherent emptiness of consciousness which doubles upon the realizedcontent of the virtual.

But this means that Deleuzes diagonal line of flight can never ascendor reach further, but always returns to the sway of the vertical and horizon-tal coordinates. It is not really post-Baroque but pre-Baroque, since itachieves only a nihilistic version of polyphonic exact plotting of inter-sections. An immanent diagonal can only sink with a vertical collapse back

into the earth or vanish in a horizontal temporal swoon which leaveshistorical time altogether. It is not a true transversal at all.By contrast, a genuinely dominant diagonal is just what one naturally

thinks it is: it is Jacobs coloured rainbow ladder for ascending and descend-ing singing angelic beings. We also ascend, with our own, other music. Theladder is a staircase, else it would be a slide and no real hierarchy. It hassteps which move along as well as upwards. Just for this reason, it is adiagonal. For a diagonal must tend as much to transcendence as toimmanence, else it would be a mere travelator. And to be an escapingdiagonal, it must in the end favour transcendence, even though this bearsfull immanence in its wake.

The only possible line of flight is consequently the ascent to heaven.This returns upon itself without self-collapse since it partially reflects aninfinity of beauty which is an infinity of retrograde motion without self-contradiction.




21/28

And the ultimacy of the diagonal, or of hierarchy, in the strictlyDionysian sense (the Neoplatonic series, which Deleuze tries to immanen-tize), means also the non-reducibility of relation. Relation remains relationbecause the relata do not collapse into the diagonal. The vertical and the

horizontal persist and are enabled by the diagonal; this is not intrinsicagonism, unlike Deleuzes model. And yet the diagonal coordination is notpre-determined (G.E. Moores internal relation) since this would monisti-cally collapse relations; nor is it only accidental or external, in a Humeanfashion, since the path and the ascent of the horizontal and vertical musicallines, respectively, are guided by the diagonal interaction.

But if relation is ultimate, then it is reducible neither to territorialsubstance nor to de-territorialized flux. It has, therefore, no immanentground. If relation is ultimate, it must be grounded only in itself. And that

means that the diagonal is itself diagonalized, crossed from the outset byanother diagonal free from all coordinates. This is the diagonal of creationas such: relations go all the way down because they exist by being related,by being posited by God, given as gifts to themselves as gifts. The diagonalgift of music lies on the created diagonal the letting down of music bythe heavenly choir spoken of by Dryden and hymned by John Blow in theirlaments for the death of Henry Purcell (Blow, 1995). It can in this respectbe questioned whether the Baroque is Leibnizian in its entirety. More plau-sibly, much Baroque music is linked with Jesuit humanism (especially in

Latin America) and with the mystical Thomism, more like Thomas himself,of the French Oratorians, beginning with Pierre Brulle (and those influ-enced by them, such as Charles de Caussade), who themselves gave rise tothe supreme Baroque musical form of the oratorio (Balthasar, 1991;Morelli, 1991).

Neither of these metaphysical sources offers either occasionalism orpre-established harmony; instead one finds what is in effect an ontology ofthe diagonal, or an attempt to see the classification of being in terms of tats,and supremely the states of Christs life, in which a vertical and performa-

tive liturgical adoration of God mysteriously intersects with a horizontalseries of events lived in time. Here the ontological is self-exceeded as doxo-logical, as praise of the divine, because it is inversely exceeded by thedivine descent into time: our aspiration upwards is enabled by the divinereaching-downwards and restoring, in Christ, of a true temporal ontologicalsequence as a life of worship. Coordination does not happen here behindthe scenes, but through a real communication of simultaneous and succes-sive states of being. As Charles de Condren put it, because all things arecreated by God and all is sacramental, there is a communion de tous lesinstants, a continuous possible composing of meaning between things, justbecause they are all self-exceeded in their inwardnesss by the divine depth.Although this depth is the ground of coordination, it is mediated by thesurface interaction in space and time of all the instants. Liturgy and historycoincide on a transversal plane which composes finite being. Hence, forBrulle, in the interaction between Jesus and Mary Magdalene, a new




22/28

ontological order of Love commences in time and is only later to becommunicated also to the angels, since the Incarnation has established anew ontological reality (1989: 1735).

It seems just as, or even more, plausible to link the new operatic

expressivism and historicity extraordinarily combined with a continuing useof counterpoint and liturgical abasement and aspiration in Baroque musicwith this Oratorian metaphysical legacy, as with the perspective of Leibniz.The former, after all, was nearer to the orbit of actual musical practice. Itwas to a considerable degree Oratorian (and also Ignatian) spirituality whichencouraged music to veer away from the polyphonic towards the moremonodic, expressive and dramatic. Probably the first fully sung stage work(regarded as imitating classically antique musical recitation the Oratorianswere very humanist) was theRappresentatione di Anima e di Corpo by Emilio

Cavalieri in 1600.It is true that some Baroque music may show a tendency to promote

the propagandistic grandeur of a dominant folding line, in collusion with apretended autonomy of separated units. This could be seen to reveal thehidden collusion of private rights with the mathesis of absolutism (Pickstock,1998a: 8195). And yet the Oratorians and the Jesuits (again especially inLatin America, with the democratization of the Baroque deploying Indiansingers and musicians, as in the work of the Italian Bolivian, DomenicoZipoli, 1992), to a degree strove for a new mode of ecclesial generosity and

harmonious association that resisted this politics, as it resisted this perver-sion of music. In the work of the Mexican Ignacio de Jrusalem (especiallyhis polychoral Mass in D Major), in Zipoli, Purcell, Zelenka, Bach, Handelsconcerti grossi or Telemanns Paris quartets, a surviving element of strongcounterpoint and polyphony ensures a true dominance of the diagonal overhorizontal massification or vertical breakdown into successive musicalfaades.

Indeed, for there to be a diagonal in the Baroque, for reasons we haveseen, the pre-established musical harmony must be resisted. Rather, despite

the release of the melodic and the harmonic, the use of delay, syncopationand semi-structural ornamentation, the musical diagonal must still emergefrom free relating and not the pre-arranged mathematical coincidence ofapparently discrete units. As is often noted, there is a gothicism inJ.S. Bach; elements have integrity and real juxtaposition, like a Gothicwindow and arch, despite the Baroque element of continuous overflow.Where there is no true diagonal, the latter is in the end spurious; apparentflow is only by the grace of frozen elements, the dead vegetation and frozenwater of Baroque fountains. But where there is real relation and diagonal-ity, there is true dynamism just because the discrete elements are notsecretly negated and not seen as inhibiting process as in the way thatBergson thought that matter negatively arrested life, even though the virtu-ality of life had to divide itself into the actual virtualiy of matter in order topropagate itself at all. Bach offers a Baroque-Gothic fusion of process andstructure that is strictly theological.




23/28

Recapitulation?

For all his modalism, refusal of serialism and final commitment to harmonyin music, and for all his practical and theoretical commitment to a non-violent non-identical repetition, one cannot entirely describe Messiaen aspostmodern. He was rather a typical Thomistic modernist; he refusedromantic historicism and subjectivism in favour of formal technique andclaritas, and was concerned to reflect permanent natural order via a reflec-tion of eternity rather then engage in a reflection upon history in a narra-tive idiom. Significantly, Messiaen composed almost no exclusivelyliturgical, as opposed to contemplative, music. Plainchant, he felt, was theonly appropriate musical liturgical language. And apart from the Tristanmyth, his music is not concerned with temporal emplotment. Still less, then,does it seek to integrate worldly with divine drama in the fashion of much

Baroque and post-Baroque liturgical music.One can link this observation with another one. For all his criticism

of Bergson and espousal of the idea that continuous variation must bemediated by fixed patterns, Messiaen still favoured complex patterns andthe mixture of such patterns because he was haunted by the notion of astochastic yearning for continuous variation, although this was for him theeternal music of the Trinity. To be sure, one should not push this observa-tion too far because Messiaen grasped the essential difficulty of this concep-tion. He realized that non-identical repetition is not pure except in God; for

human beings it has always to be mixed with deployment of identicallyrepeated patterns. Or, one could say, that the mysterious one compared withone invoked in analogy of attribution has to be combined with measurableanalogy of proportion when one is conjugating the relations of this world,even if attribution is more fundamental and becomes still more so in theyearning toward the eternal.

Nevertheless, Messiaen seemed somewhat to scorn the deployment ofsimple repeated proportions, affirming that Bach and jazz swamp rhythmwith metre and so are unrhythmical (Samuel, 1967: 65ff.). Yet in contrast

to this perspective, it could be claimed that just the use of perpetualidentical repetition allows one to spring surprises and exhibit continuousvariation, and to do so in a readily hearable and popular manner. These twoobservations come together with respect to anthropocentrism: the regularlyrepeated, as in the case of a more regular tonal or modal range, lies nearerto the capacities of the human voice and unstrained ear. For this reason, itis well adapted to narrative. Like much modernism, there is somethingapolitical about Messiaens music.

At the same time, one would not want to lose the range of Messiaens

new cosmic effects; one could argue that the aim of postmodern musicshould be to integrate the cosmic and the human, the spatially expansivewith the narratively temporal, and the tonal and the repeated withdissonance and continuous variation. This would mean, though, that someusual characterizations of the postmodern would not hold good of music. Itwould actually be more humanistic, historicist and political than the




24/28

modern. Moreover, in its aim to compose harmoniously, it would be religiousand not nihilistic.

But such in fact is arguably the case. John Adams minimalist use ofrepetition is often attuned to music that boldly confronts the politics of our

time: Nixon in China, the Palestinian problem in Harmonium. Otherminimalists, such as John Tavener and Arvo Prt (whose work partiallydevelops the trajectory of Britten), are clearly concerned with the religiousrealm. Do they, however, qualify as postmodern? Not really, in the sense ofseeking to integrate modernist with pre-modernist techniques, sincemodernist techniques are so largely abandoned; sometimes, in Tavernerscase, along with all the dramatic, conflictual elements of post-mediaevalmusic.

The music that better qualifies did not emerge from the neoliberal

West, normally associated with the postmodern. Rather it emerged fromthe old communist East in the compositions of Alfred Schnittke, GalinaUstvolskaya and Sofia Gubaidulina. In Ustvolskayas music, one has amarriage of dissonance with constant variation of liturgical themes. Indeed,all these composers push musical anguish, stridence and ugliness to anew level, and yet they contrast this with the arrival of musical grace.Ustvolskaya makes Dona nobis pacem sound forth as peace through aterrible musical screeching (Ustvolskaya, 1994). One is reminded here, asJames MacMillan has noted, that before Cecilia became the patron saint of

music, it was represented by Job on account of his patience. For, as helikewise says, it is in fact religious faith which exposes the greatest depthof suffering. If there is no ultimate meaning, then suffering is also meaning-less and so is not suffering at all. Suffering and evil are only terrible becausethere is good, which, to be good, must be more final than evil. Messiaenmade a similar point, citing Ernest Hello: the abyss of death must showdeath so that the abyss of height can show above itself as life (Samuel, 1967:140). Yet the sense of a dramatic passage through death and evil on thisearth is not strongly present in the French composer.

By contrast, the retrieval of a more tonal, regular (sometimes minimal-ist) narrative element in these composers permits this expression of suffer-ing and its dramatic resolution or problematic semi-resolution. In the caseof the German-Russian Schnittke, this is paradigmatically shown in hispiece for violin and orchestra Quasi una Sonata (1990). Here the develop-ment and recapitulation radically break down, but in such a way as to showthat any such things are only gestures toward an impossibly completedevelopment and recapitulation (like praying in order to pray) (Pickstock,1998a: 167267). Yet in making such a gesture, somehow the reconciliationis all the more real, even if more anguished and temporary.

In his other works, especially the concerti grossi, Schnittke offers aneo-Baroque that runs into frenzied Faustian extremes and mixes tonalitywith atonality and the banality of popular music, which for Schnittke isboth demonically seductive and yet somehow beautiful and redeemable(Schnittke, 2004). His music negotiates (after Thomas Mann) the appeal of




25/28

the Faustian wish for absolute musical control and easy aesthetic wealth: itconfronts the demonic in order to overcome it and redeem what must remaingood in it if it is to be at all. Unsurprisingly, for the listener, one gathersthat Schnittke became a Catholic in order to rescue himself from abysses

opened up by involvement in the occult (Harvey, 1999: 1716; Ivashkin,1996). And his music reflects with constant irony, pain and nostalgia uponthe course of human history from the early modern Baroque era to thepresent Faustian age.

Sometimes the blend of tonal and atonal in Schnittke seems tooconstantly ironic and merely juxtaposed, as also in the nonetheless very finework of the Finnish composer Einojuhani Rautavaara (2002). But one doesnot find this in Ustvolskaya, although in her case the development is ofessentially atonal elements. The work of Sofia Gubaidulina also exceeds

mere juxtaposition, and moreover develops a complicated theological inte-gration of tonal with atonal elements. Like Messiaen (who continued theFrench tradition of the deliberately non-Germanic referential symphonicpoem, beginning with Saint-Saens and Csar Franck), Gubaidulina refusesthe absolute music of modernism and her work is replete with the program-matic, from the representation of a tight-rope walker to the use of numbersymbolism and liturgical allusion. She sees musical rhythmic strategies legato,pizzicato,glissando,vibrato, col legno and so forth as representingdiverse spiritual states, and above all she contrasts the uneven and obscure

staccato of the quotidian with the legato of the liturgical. The latter, however,only emerges in her music from a complex tensional interplay of differentmoods: the sensual, the anxious, the mournful, the courageous in particu-lar, which all offer their own partial beatitude and yet require a fusion ina coincidence of opposites which lies at the heart of religion.

In her piano concertoIntroitus, referring to the introductory chant ofthe Mass in the Roman Catholic liturgy, she conveys this interaction ofmoods by use of a complex polytonality in alternated succession andcombination. The wind instruments play in a microchromatic idiom, often

accompanied by pizzicato, to represent the natural restless state of humanity; the strings in a chromatic range to represent existential aware-ness of the human condition of loneliness and longing. Both these rangesdevelop essentially horizontal melodic and rhythmic themes, since they areconcerned with human life in time. The piano, by contrast, plays in anaustere pentatonic mode which conveys ascetic striving to overcome egotismand is concerned with the vertically chordal, expressed by an iconicdeployment of fifths and major and minor thirds. Finally, all the instrumentsin combination at times play in a diatonic range which suggests an integra-tion of all these elements of human life within a contrapuntal and surgingdiagonal, which still exhibits some of the early influence of Shostakovitchupon this composer.

However, the diatonic attempts at integration, sometimes heralded bya dramatic flurry of ultra-tonal diminished sevenths, keep musicallybreaking down, and, in a rising spiral of intensity, it is the pentatonic piano




26/28

which has continuously to renew the reconciliatory impulse. There is acontinuous liturgical process of lapsing, starting again and rising once moreto a new but provisional state of peace. In the end, a brightly flickeringdiatonic resolution dominated by the strings passes over into a prolonged

pentatonic piano trill which gradually diminishes and concludes the work(Gubaidulina, 2002). Likewise, in some pieces by James MacMillan, forexample Veni, Veni, Emmanuel, one hears a seamless fusion of the tonal,atonal and the percussive. In his case, there is an integration of Messiaensuse of complex polyrhythm, polydynamics and polysonority, plus a complexsense of retrogradation and non-retrogradation (MacMillan, 1997). Hismusic is Catholic in a way that makes his espoused Catholicism seem almostincidental.

We live in an era of musical hope. Time and space, narrative and

simultaneous complex sonority are coming together with the human and thecosmic. A richer diagonal is being composed; it newly descends.

References

Aquinas, Thomas (1967) Summa Theologiae, trans. Thomas Gilby. London:Blackfriars.

Balthasar, Hans Urs von (1991) The Metaphysics of the Oratory, pp. 11941 inThe Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics V: The Realm of Metaphysics in theModern Age, trans. Oliver Davies et al. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark.Bergson, Henri (1983) Creative Evolution, trans. Arthur Mitchell. New York:University Press of America.

Brulle, Pierre de (1989) Elevation to Jesus Christ our Lord concerning his conductand grace towards Mary Magdalene, I, 5, Brulle and the French School: SelectedWritings, ed. and trans. William Thompson and Lowell M. Glendon. New York:Paulist Press.

Blow, John (1995) Ode on the Death of Mr. Henry Purcell (CD), Walter Bergmannwith Alfred Deller and John Whitworth, countertenors. London: Vanguard. (Re-release of 1950s Stour music festival live recording.)

Booth, Edward (1980) Thomas Aquinas, The New Grove Dictionary of Music andMusicians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Boulez, Pierre (1966) Jai horreur de souvenir, in Denise Mayer and PierreSouvtchinsky,Roger Desormire et son temps. Monaco: Editions du Rocher.Boulez, Pierre (1968) Notes of an Apprenticeship, trans. R. Weinstock. New York:Knopf.

Boulez, Pierre (1971)Boulez on Music Today, trans. S. Bradshaw and R. Bennett.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Boulez, Pierre (1974) Eloge de lamnsie, Musique en Jeu 16 (November): 927.

Boulez, Pierre (2002) Pli selon Pli (CD), Christine Schafer, Soprano, EnsembleIntercontemporain. Hamburg: Deutsche Grammaphon.

Bruhn, Siglind (ed.) (1998) Messiaens Language of Mystical Love. New York:Garland.

Darbyshire, Ian (1998) Messiaen and the Representation of the Theological Illusion




27/28

of Time, pp. 3355 in Siglind Bruhn (ed.)Messiaens Language of Mystical Love.New York: Garland.

Deleuze, Gilles (1993) The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque, trans. Tom Conley.London: Athlone.

Deleuze, Gilles (2001) Pure Immanence: Essays on a Life, trans. Anne Boyman.New York: Zone.

Deleuze, Gilles and Flix Guattari (1987) A Thousand Plateaux, trans. BrianMassumi. London: Athlone.

Fabbi, Roberto (1998) Theological Implications of Restrictions in MessiaensCompositional Processes, pp. 5584 in Siglind Bruhn (ed.)Messiaens Languageof Mystical Love. New York: Garland.Garcia, Jos Mauricio Nunes (1999) Missa Pastoril para Noite de Natal (CD),Ensemble Turicum, Luis Alves da Silva and Mathias Weibel. Strasbourg: Les

Chemins du Baroque de la Terre au Feu.Gubaidulina, Sofia (2002) Introitus, on In the Mirror (CD), Batrice Rauchs,Vladimir Kozhukhar, Kyiv Chamber Players. Akersberga: BIS Records.

Hart, David (2003) The Beauty of the Infinite: The Aesthetics of Christian Truth.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Harvey, Jonathan (1999) In Quest of Spirit: Thoughts on Music. Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.

Hirschbaum, Theo (1998) Magic and Enchantment in Messiaens CataloguedOiseaux, pp. 195224 in Siglind Bruhn (ed.) Messiaens Language of Mystical

Love. New York: Garland.Isacoff, Stuart (2003) Temperament. New York: Vintage.Ivashkin, Alexander (1996)Alfred Schnittke. London: Phaidon.MacMillan, James (1997) Veni, Veni, Emmanuel/Tryst (CD), Colin Currie, UlsterOrchestra, Takuo Yuasa. London: Naxos.

Matheson, Iain G. (ed.) (1995) The Messiaen Companion. London: Faber

Musicotheological Critique

Documents

Transcript of Musicotheological Critique