Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

download Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

of 37

Transcript of Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    1/37

    1

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Fieldbus Foundation India Marketing Committee

    Fieldbus Engineering Methodology

    Murali Krishnan TEmerson Process Management,

    Asia Pacific

    Fieldbus FoundationParadigm Change in Instrumentation Technology

    Date : 26th of September, 2008 (Friday)Time : from 09:00 am to 06:00 pm.Venue : Automation 2008 Conference Hall.

    : Conference Hall, Bombay Exhibition Centre (NSE),

    Goregaon (East), Mumbai INDIA

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    2/37

    2

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Designing Fieldbus Segments Segment Design Considerations

    Constraint Checks

    Communications Processing

    Components Selection

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    3/37

    3

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Segment Design Considerations Instrument Functionality

    Instrument Location

    Process Control Requirements

    Availability Requirements

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    4/37

    4

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Instrument Functionality

    Pick the right instrument for the application

    Find out which function blocks are availablewith an instrument

    Most common function blocks are AI, AO, PID,

    DI, DO

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    5/37

    5

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Transmitter

    PID with Auto Tuning

    Output Splitter (OS) Control Selector (SEL)

    Arithmetic

    Integrator Signal Characterizer

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    6/37

    6

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Multi Input Temperature Transmitters

    Classic & HART I/O

    H1

    AS-i

    DeviceNet/Profibus

    8 RTD/ TCInputs

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    7/37

    7

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Discrete I/Os Transmitter

    Classic & HART I/O

    H1

    AS-i

    DeviceNet/Profibus

    8 DI / 8 DO& logic

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    8/37

    8

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Process Control Requirements

    How are the measurements being used?

    Monitor only or used in PID control? Required update time?

    Input processing, such as P-T compensation?

    Output processing, such as split-range?

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    9/37

    9

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Process Control Requirements The measurement device and control element of a

    PID loop mustbe on the same segment forControl-in-field (CIF)

    The PID Function Block can be located in thetransmitter (CIF), valve (CIF), or control can bein the controller (CIC)

    Where to locate the PID block(s) depends on the

    complexity of the control strategy

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    10/37

    10

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Availability Requirements

    Redundancy requirements

    Equipment segregation Distribution of critical loops

    Component redundancy

    - Fieldbus Power supplies/Power Conditioners- H1 card

    - LAS (Back up LAS in a field device)

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    11/37

    11

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Designing For Process Modularity

    Hot Oil Return

    D-38004

    D-38003

    D-36003

    D-36004

    Condensate Stripper

    Raw Methanol Stripper

    Fuel Gas Header

    Weir

    TT101A LT101

    FT501

    100%

    100%

    TT101B

    PT401

    LT101

    Segment 2

    PIDAI AO

    Segment 1

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    12/37

    12

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Process Safety Levels (Client Driven)Level 1 ValvesFailure of this valve will result in a total system trip, causing a shutdown of the entire unit, or otherunavoidable losses in excess of $100M. Level 1 valves and their associated measurement shallreside on H1 segments with no other devices. The ISD shall show the criticality rating and shallprominently display that no additional devices shall be loaded on this segment.Level 2 ValvesFailure of a level 2 valve will result in an emergency situation, where prompt operator action wouldbe required to "save" the unit from immanent total shutdown. The material and energy capacity ofassociated vessels, geographic location, and elevation/accessibility of such valves should beconsidered. Failure of a level 2 valve will result in a total system trip, causing a shutdown of the entireunit, or other unavoidable losses in excess of $100M. However, the level 2 valve's process dynamics

    allow time for quick recovery from the failure, either by quickly fixing a fault or by taking manualcontrol. Level 2 valves and their associated measurement shall reside on H1 segments with no otherlevel 1 or 2 valves. The ISD shall show the criticality rating.Level 3 ValvesFailure of this valve will not result in any short-term risk of total unit shutdown. Level 3 valves can go totheir fail position without requiring any immediate operator action. Level 3 valves can reside on cards

    or segments with other level 3 valves, or on a segment with a level 2 valve. Consideration should begiven to the impact of common mode failures among level 3 and level 2 & 3 valves on the samesegment.

    EXAMPLE ONLY VARIES WITH CUSTOMER

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    13/37

    13

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Assigning Fieldbus Devices to a Segment

    Maximum 16 devices per segment

    Recommended loading- Total of 12 devices per segment

    - Total of 4 control loops per segment

    Devices should be placed on segmentsbased on location, control function, andreliability requirements

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    14/37

    14

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Constraint Checks

    Distance Limits

    Spur Length Power Consumption

    Voltage Drop

    Communications Processing

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    15/37

    15

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Spur Length

    Terminator Terminator

    Trunk

    Spur

    T T

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    16/37

    16

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Topology

    Trunk

    To H1

    Card

    Combination Topology

    JBSpur

    JunctionBox

    Most Common

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    17/37

    17

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Fieldbus Network Components (non-IS)

    PCPS

    T1 +S1 +S2 + S21 +S22 +S23 .+ Sn

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    18/37

    18

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Voltage Drop26 ma

    11 ma

    15 ma

    17 ma

    Total = 69 ma

    Fieldbus

    PowerSupply19 V

    3000 feet

    #18 AWG, 6.4 /1000ft

    Voltage = 19 - [ (3000 x 6.4/1000 x 69/1000) x 2 ]

    Voltage = 19 - 2.65Voltage = 16.35

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    19/37

    19

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Segment Power Considerations

    JunctionBox

    Fieldbus

    PowerSupply

    Non-IS Application (Safe)

    Intrinsic Safety Models

    Entity (IS) FISCO (Zone 1) FNICO (Non incendive)

    Field Barriers

    ?

    ?

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    20/37

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Single

    Power Conditioner

    (Examples)

    Redundant,Multi-segment

    FISCO, FNICO

    Redundant,Multi-segment

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    21/37

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Wiring Blocks

    (Examples)

    Zone 2Ex nL

    Zone 1Ex me

    Zone 1/0

    Ex ia

    Fieldbus BarriersEx me [ia]

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    22/37

    22

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Fieldbus Design Tools (Examples)

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    23/37

    23

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Fieldbus Segment Design Tool Report

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    24/37

    24

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Link Active Scheduler runs segment Link Active Scheduler (LAS) is the data

    Traffic Cop of the segment- Controls all access to the segment- Keeps track of who is on the segment- Runs Macro Cycle-

    Time Clock for segment

    LAS can be in any device on segment thathas the capability- All host have LAS- Many devices have LAS

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    25/37

    25

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Communications Processing

    The LAS allocates both scheduled (for closedloop control) and unscheduled (Set point,monitoring loops, alarms) time on the bus

    Macrocycle time depends on block executionspeed, number of blocks, communicationsbetween blocks, etc.

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    26/37

    26

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    Scheduling

    Time

    Scheduled CyclicCommunication

    UnscheduledCommunication

    AI

    PID

    AO

    Scheduled Function

    Block Execution

    FUNCTION BLOCK SCHEDULING

    LAS ScheduleMacrocycle

    LAS ScheduleMacrocycle

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    27/37

    27

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    PIDIN

    OUT

    BKCAL_INFIELDVUE

    AO

    BKCAL_OUT

    CAS_IN

    AIOUT

    Valve

    Transmitter

    Function Blocks in FOUNDATION fieldbus

    Solutions

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    28/37

    28

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    ControlControlin the Fieldin the Field--An ExampleAn Example

    AIN

    Flow Transmiter

    OUT

    Valve

    AOUT

    PID

    BKCAL_OUT

    CAS_IN

    BKCAL_INOUT

    IN

    AIN-PID-AOUT Loop

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    29/37

    29

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Communications Processing

    AI PID AO

    20ms 30ms 30ms 25ms

    This sample loop on a segment results

    in a minimum 105 ms macrocycle time.

    AI PID AO

    20ms 30ms 30ms 25ms

    > 105 ms

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    30/37

    30

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Communications Processing

    Adding a second loop on the segmentresults in a longer macro-cycle time, but nottwice as long (30ms compelled data time).

    AI PID AO

    20ms

    30ms

    30ms

    25ms

    AI PID AO

    AI PID AO

    20ms

    30ms

    30ms

    25ms

    AI PID AO

    > 135 ms

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    31/37

    31

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    Advantages of Control in the Field

    FOUNDATIONTM fieldbus allows for control in the field!

    Deterministic Control

    Single loop integrity available

    Faster Speed of response

    Free up controller to handle advanced applications(embedded APC)

    Devices with more function blocks offer moreflexibility for Control in the Field

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    32/37

    32

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Instrument data Sheets for Ff devicesInstrument data Sheets for Ff devices

    Working voltage (9-32 volts) Maximum current draw from bus Function block requirements Block execution speeds Standard/Advanced Diagnostics requirements Interoperability tested (ITK4.0 FF base standard)

    Polarity sensitivity Capacity for instantiable function blocks LAS capability Device revision

    Channel number and description Any local indicator required

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    33/37

    33

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Fieldbus View MacrocycleGraphs the macrocycle for a given segment

    Quickly evaluate Fieldbus segmentcommunications

    Quickly evaluate Fieldbus segmentcommunications

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    34/37

    34

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Segment Design Drawing

    May be used in place of loop drawings

    Will show general topology of segment Can be used for documentation of design

    constraints

    - Segment & spur length- Voltage drop and current draw

    - Loop execution requirements

    - Process Criticality Level

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    35/37

    35

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Sample Segment Drawing

    Typical Instrument Segment DiagramMTL/REL Red. Power Cond.

    March 23, 2004

    None

    Sudhir Jain

    DATE:

    SCALE:

    DRAWINGNO:

    DESIGN: DRAWN:

    CHECKED:

    APPROVAL:

    JOB: REV:

    CADFILE:

    CUST.

    APPR.

    PROJ.

    ENG.CHK:BY:REVISIONS

    ISSUED FOR CUSTOMER APPROVAL

    DATE:REV:

    A

    Emerson Consider It Solv ed

    ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION0

    0

    Located @ xxxx

    H1InterfaceFieldbusModule

    Controller: 01Card: 03Port: 01

    DeltaV Cabinet: DV-01

    BKWH

    H1Terminal

    Block

    ToShieldBusBar

    onDeltaVCarrier

    Field

    BK

    WH

    FJB-101

    (Note: Typic al wire tagging

    for all f ield devices.)

    JunctionBox

    Reference Drawings

    CabinetWiringDetails

    P&ID

    84-

    5+

    76-

    1 2

    Cable #

    Multipair cable or Single pair

    XXXX Meters

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Fieldbus

    XX MBK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    Single Pair

    141-PV-101

    BK

    WH

    Note:

    This is a one piece block (Megablock) that has internal

    jumpering, (i.e. no hard-wired jumpers required). Hard-

    wired jumpers are required when y ou tie two blocks

    together.

    This block can be ordered with internal spurguards which

    limits the spur current to 60 mA during a short c ircuit

    condition.

    The connectors are pluggable therefore com missioning

    and maintenance are simplified.

    3+

    FPS/01-0301

    Port

    Card

    Controller

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    T+-S

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    Relcom/MTLRedundant

    PowerConditioner

    EmersonProcessManagement

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Fieldbus

    XX M

    Cut&Tape

    (Typ.forall)

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

    BK

    WH

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    36/37

    36

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Fieldbus Design Tools and DocumentsThe following is a summary ofcommon tools/documents used inFieldbus Design and Implementation:

    Fieldbus Design Methodology (FDS) :A document that spells out factors totake into consideration during thedesign process.

    Segment Design Tool : In the form of

    drag and drop to check segment design Vendor-specifc documents for

    Procedures, Application Notes andDesign Review

    Foundation Fieldbus Installation Guide.

    Fieldbus Pre-commissioning Procedure. Fieldbus Troubleshooting Guide

    Fieldbus Troubleshooting GuideFieldbus Troubleshooting GuideFieldbus Troubleshooting Guide

    DeltaV Foundation Fieldbus Installation Guide.DeltaV Foundation Fieldbus Installation Guide.

  • 8/3/2019 Murali Krishnan Engineering Methodology Emerson

    37/37

    37

    2008 Fieldbus Foundation

    2008 FFIMC - Automation 2008-Mumbai

    Designing Fieldbus Segments - Summary

    1. Select the proper instrumentation

    2. Group according to location & controlfunction

    3. Lay out fieldbus segment

    4. Check segment length & spur length5. Check current draw & voltage drop

    6. Check communications loading

    7. Choose wiring methods

    8. Choose components