Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

16
ultiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS Junpei Takano

description

Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS. Junpei Takano. PHENIX (p). Absolute Polarimeter (H jet). RHIC pC Polarimeters. Superconducting Siberian Snakes. BRAHMS & PP2PP (p). RHIC. Superconducting Siberian Snakes. STAR (p). Spin Rotators. Solenoidal snake for imperfection res. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

Page 1: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

Multiple Partial Siberian Snakesin the AGS

Junpei Takano

Page 2: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

BRAHMS & PP2PP (p)

STAR (p)

PHENIX (p)

AGS

LINACBOOSTER

Pol. Proton Source500 mA, 300 ms

Spin Rotators

Solenoidal snakefor imperfection res.but produce coupling res.Achieved P=40% in 2003

SuperconductingSiberian Snakes

RHIC pC PolarimetersAbsolute Polarimeter (H jet)

RHIC

SuperconductingSiberian Snakes

Cold snake for imperfection res. and intrinsic res. Achieved P=65% in 2006 with Warm snake

Warm snake for imperfection res. Reduced coupling res. Achieved P=50% in 2004 and P=55% in 2005

Page 3: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

0 10 20 30 40 504

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

Snak

e st

reng

th [

%]

G

CSNK_1.5T CSNK_2.0T CSNK_2.5T SSNK WSNK

Snake strength has energy dependence

Injection Extraction

Page 4: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

Merit 1: large spin tune gapMerit 2: small spin mismatch

Double snake scheme

1

2: CSNK strength

: WSNK strength

A20:CSNK E20:WSNK

AGS

to RHIC

from Booster

120°

)}cos(2

{coscos1 1

Gsp

)}3

cos(2

sin2

sin)cos(2

cos2

{coscos1 21211

GGsp

← Spin tune Eq. for “single” snake

↓ Spin tune Eq. for “double” snake

Page 5: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

4 5 6 7 8 9 10Ggamma

spin

tun

e

WSNK+CSNKWSNKIntrinsic res.

WSNK=8.4%CSNK=15%

12k±νy (νy = 8.9)

Injection energy

Large spin tune gap

Spin tune around first intrinsic resonance with 2 snakes

= 3m

Page 6: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

Stable spin direction

-1.2-1

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 10 20 30 40 50

AGS location

n_xn_yn_zmismatch

injinj ext

Spin mismatch

CSNK WSNK

CSNK@A20=20%, WSNK@E20=8%

Page 7: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

Coldsnake%

vertcomp

Pol. at injection

0 1.000 80.00

5 0.997 79.75

10 0.988 79.02

15 0.972 77.79

20 0.951 76.09

25 0.924 73.91

30 0.891 71.28

Without Warm Snake(Cold Snake only)

Coldsnake%

vertcomp

Pol at injection

0 0.992 79.37

5 0.999 79.91

10 0.999 79.96

15 0.994 79.52

20 0.982 78.58

25 0.965 77.17

30 0.941 75.27

With 8% Warm Snake(Double snake)

Snake strength at “injection” energy

Page 8: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

If the SSNK is relocated from I10 to I20....Spin tune gap will be larger.

)3

cos(2

sin2

sin)cos(2

cos2

cos2

{coscos1 213211

GGsp

)}3

cos(2

sin2

sin)3

cos(2

sin2

sin 1332 GG

SSNKI20←I10

A20:CSNK E20:WSNK

AGS

to RHIC

from Booster

1 2 3: CSNK strength : WSNK strength : SSNK strength( )

Page 9: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Ggamma

spin

tun

e WSNK+CSNK+SSNKWSNK+CSNKWSNKIntrinsic res.

Large spin tune gap

CSNK=16%

WSNK=8%

SSNK= 10%

Spin tune around first intrinsic resonance with 3snakes

Page 10: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

CSNK=15%, WSNK=8%, SSNK=-7%

Stable spin direction

-1.2-1

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

0 10 20 30 40 50

AGS location

n_xn_yn_zmismatch

injinj ext

SSNKWSNKCSNK

Spin mismatch with 3snakes

No spin mismatch

Page 11: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

33100 33200 33300 33400 335000.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0

Inte

nsit

y (1

e11)

run#

33100 33200 33300 33400 335000

1020304050607080

Pol

ariz

atio

n [%

]

Red: 10%CSNK+6%WSNKBlue: 6%CSNK+6%WSNK

Result in RUN6

Page 12: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

Summary

The triple snake scheme was simulated. ・ Larger spin tune gap ・ No spin mismatch

6%CSNK+6%WSNK was operated. Achieved same level polarization to 10%CSNK +6%WSNK

If the 6%+6% machine is optimized, the polarization might be improved.

Page 13: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

Extra slides

Page 14: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

SSD at Ggamma=4.5

-1.2-1

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

11.2

AGS location

spin

com

pon

ent

n_x

n_y

n_z

C15 H10 L20L20 A20 E20C20

4. Double partial snakes scheme

Spin mismatch

CSNK = 24% Injection energy

Vertical component at L20 = 0.930

Page 15: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

SSD at Ggamma=4.5

-1.2-1

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

11.2

AGS location

spin

com

pon

ent

n_x

n_y

n_z

C15 H10 I20 L20L20 A20 E20 I10C20

No spin mismatch

CSNK = 10%, WSNK = 6%, SSNK = 4% Extraction energy

Page 16: Multiple Partial Siberian Snakes in the AGS

Operation of SSNK for triple snake scheme

0%

10%

injection

extraction

ramp upS

SN

K s

tren

gth

%

-7.6%

4%

The current at injection is negative for no spin mismatch.Then the sign should be turned to positive to open the spin tune gap larger, but the bipolar PS is needed in this case.