MULTIMODALITY MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC FOOT WOUNDS Martin R. Back, MD Associate Professor of Surgery...
-
Upload
steven-wells -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of MULTIMODALITY MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC FOOT WOUNDS Martin R. Back, MD Associate Professor of Surgery...
MULTIMODALITY MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC
FOOT WOUNDS
Martin R. Back, MDAssociate Professor of Surgery
Tampa, FL
WHY A WOUND WON’T HEAL
1. ISCHEMIA - PAD, Buerger’s, Raynaud’s, other
2. EDEMA - Venous insufficiency, lymphedema, cardiac/hepatic/renal failure
3. PRESSURE-RELATED - neuropathy, debility/nonambulatory
4. INFECTION
5. FOREIGN BODY
6. MALNUTRITION
7. COMPROMISED IMMUNE FUNCTION - cancer
DIABETES MELLITUS - EPIDEMIOLOGY
• 14 million diabetics in U.S.
• 40 % of U.S. population older than 70 yo afflicted
• 80 % of diabetic deaths are atherosclerosis-related, most due to MI
• 50 % of diabetics develop PVD (after 10 yrs)
• 50 % of nontraumatic limb amputations performed yearly in U.S. occur in diabetics
DIABETES DEMOGRAPHICS
DIABETIC FOOT WOUNDS - EPIDEMIOLOGY
• 15 - 25 % diabetics will have foot ulcer in lifetime
• 14 - 24 % of diabetics with foot ulcer will require amputation
• limb gangrene 53x more frequent in men and 71x in women with DM than in nondiabetics
• equal male:female preponderence in diabetics with PVD and limb gangrene
• complications of diabetic foot wounds account for more hospital days than all other DM complications combined
IS WOUND HEALING ALTERED IN DIABETICS ?
• Abnormal cellular inflammatory response
yes in-vitro in-vivo ?
• Chronic wound factors
exaggerated proinflammatory environment
• Peripheral neuropathy
abnormal foot anatomy + repetitive trauma
• Atherosclerosis
distal limb ischemia & tissue hypoxia
DIABETIC ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Comparison ischemic amputated limbs in diabetics and nondiabetics - Ferrier, 1967
• No difference incidence occlusive dz popliteal, tibial, pedal arteries
• More occlusive dz and calcification of metatarsal and digital arteries in diabetics
RELATIONSHIP OF RESTING ABI (disease severity) TO ISCHEMIC SYMPTOMS
ABI < 0.6
less chance of healing
RELATIONSHIP OF TOE PRESSURE TO ISCHEMIC SYMPTOMS AND PRESENCE OF DIABETES
Toe P < 60 mmHg :
less chance of healing
DIABETIC ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Popliteal / tibial dz - ‘meltdown’
Severe calcific vessels
Distal tibial / pedal targets
Autologous vein graft bypass over endovascular therapies for multilevel/long-length occlusions
Patency equivalent to non-diabetics
OPTIMAL DISTAL REVASCULARIZATION : FEMOROTIBIAL BYPASS WITH SAPHENOUS
VEIN GRAFT
CONTRAINDICATIONS - advanced / necrotizing foot infections, advanced gangrene in chronic renal failure patients
REVASCULARIZATION VERSUS PRIMARY AMPUTATION FOR LIMB THREAT
• Similar operative mortality retrospective studies
revasc (2 - 8 %) v. amp (1.5 - 13 %)
• No difference in long-term survival revasc v. primary amp
• No preference from cost analyses, but complications increase cost of either
• Injudicious, “heroic” attempts revasc lead to higher level amputation
• ? Higher level amp after failed revasc
• Secondary amp level equal after failed prosthetic or autologous bypass grafts
• ESRD & implications low limb salvage after revasc
DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
Symmetric mixed polyneuropathy
• increased incidence with duration of DM majority pts after 10-15 yrs
• affects distal lower limbs• segmental demyelination• etiology of injury ?
ischemia metabolic (polyol, prostaglandin, carnitine, GF)immune
DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
MANIFESTATIONS
• Sensory lossearly dysesthesias and painful paresthesias
loss of vibratory sense
loss of light touch and pain “stocking & glove” distribution
loss of deep tendon reflexes
• Motor lossatrophy foot intrinsic musculature
pes cavus deformity, hammer toe formation
prominent MT heads, migration MT fat pads
arch collapse ===> Charcot’s arthropathy
DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
• Autonomic losssympathetic (earlier) & parasympathetic loss
foot anhidrosis
vasomotor dysfunction (AV shunting, orthostatic hypotension)
GI, GU dysfunction
increased mortality (cardiac, renal)
IMPLICATIONS OF NEUROPATHY &
‘ARCHITECTURAL’ FOOT CHANGES
COMPLICATIONS OF ‘END-STAGE’ NEUROPATHY &
CHARCOT FOOT ANATOMY
TREATMENT
NON-INFLAMMED NEUROPATHIC ULCERS
• No role for antibiotics• Off - loading
orthopedic cast shoes, heel ‘cutoff’ sole, crutches
total contact castminimal ambulation / bedrest
• Wound cleansing & dressing changes• Debridement / Metatarsal head resection• Topical recombinant human PDGF, other agents• Gabapentin/neurontin for dysethetic symptoms/pain
PRIOR MULTI-DIGIT AMPUTATIONS WITH RECURRENT PLANTAR NEUROPATHIC ULCER -
transdorsal distal metatarsal / head resection
DIABETIC FOOT INFECTION
CLASSIFICATION
• Non-limb threatening / Mild
no systemic toxicity
< 2 cm local cellulitis
superficial
• Limb threatening / Severe
ischemic limb / gangrene
extensive cellulitis
deep space abscess
osteomyelitis
TREATMENT GOALS :
Control local sepsis (operative)
Control systemic sepsis (antibx)
Revascularization for foot salvage
Staged wound closure / skin coverage
TREATMENT
NON - LIMB THREATENING INFECTIONS
• 1 - 2 week course oral antibiotics• ? value topical antibiotics• Non-invasive vascular evaluation• Treatment neuropathic ulcer• Frequent, careful follow-up
The Septic Diabetic Foot
• ‘a little painful’ per patient, first visit for med care
• chronic plantar ulcer not recognized / treated
• worsening hyperglycemia
• marked leukocytosis
• extensive cellulitis medial ankle, malodorous wound
• weak monophasic pedal Doppler, palpable femoral pulse
DIABETIC FOOT INFECTION
VISCIOUS CYCLE OF SEPTIC FOOT
HYPERGLYCEMIA
LOCAL SEPSIS SYSTEMIC SEPSIS
Broad-spectrum IV antibx
Aggressive volume replacement (saline)
Glycemic control (IV insulin)
Cardiac protection, anti-platelet
Probable plantar space abscess / near-necrotizing infection = unsalvagable
Urgent explore/debride ankle disarticulation staged BKA
NON-HEALING TMA TREATED WITH PROLONGED VAC SPONGE THERAPY
DIABETIC FOOT WOUNDS : OUTCOMES
TREATMENTPRESENTATION % LIMB LOSS
EARLY LATE
Septic foot 16 % 20 %
Moderate infection 0 % 18 %
Ischemic ulcer / gangrene 1 % 39 %
F / U contralateral limb 15%
SOBERING RESULTS !!
NEW SOLUTION =
OLD SOLUTION
=
PREVENTION
Education
Glycemic control
Foot care
Early medical tx
CREATIVE FOOT AMPUTATIONS FOR HEEL
SALVAGE
MIDFOOT AMPUTATIONS
• for failed TMAs, extensive forefoot tissue loss
• viable, non-infected plantar surface/flap, no Charcot changes
• Chopart/Lisfranc/variant, no Symes
• rongeur articular surfaces tarsal bones
• divide Achilles tendon puncture incision (prevent equinus deformity)
• no wt bearing 3+ wks
‘CLAM-SHELL’ PROSTHESIS
77 TMAs in 74 patients
32 healed 24/26 functional amb 41 non-healed TMAs 32 midfoot amp + 6 late amps + 9 early amps
23/25 functional amb
+ 6 early amps
MIDFOOT AMPUTATION - PATIENT SELECTION
TOP TEN LESSONS / PEARLS / TENETS / PITFALLS
10. Gangrene = severe ischemia, PAD needs revascularization *
* except limited digit gangrene, no infection
10. For patients with PAD, the worse the infection at presentation or the greater the tissue loss, the more normal the arterial supply must be for foot salvage
8. For severe infections with sepsis, the extent of infection/necrosis deep in the foot is always worse than superficial/skin appearance
TOP TEN LESSONS / PEARLS / TENETS / PITFALLS
7. Urgent / emergent exploration/debridement for septic foot presentations = priority of controlling local infection
8. For severe infections, use staged debridements/open amps at joints without opening articular surfaces (avoid late osteomyelitis) until final wound closure
5. Prolonged antibiotic therapy is rarely effective for osteomyelitis without resection of bony prominences (neuropathic ulcers) or revascularization for ischemia
TOP TEN LESSONS / PEARLS / TENETS / PITFALLS
4. Symes amputation (or any other resecting calcaneus, talus) is not functional
5. Creative/unconventional midfoot amputations are functional & less energy expenditure than proximal amp levels (BKA, AKA)
2. Large heel wounds (involving calcaneus) are most difficult to successfully treat
TOP TEN LESSONS / PEARLS / TENETS / PITFALLS
1. The sooner the wound heals / skin closes, the better the outcome …
do not pursue prolonged secondary ‘granulation’ healing in large wounds/exposed bone, instead operative debridements and delayed closure !