Multi-State Hazardous Waste Information Exchange WasteX February 28 – March 1, 2005.

Multi-State Hazardous Waste Multi-State Hazardous Waste Information ExchangeInformation Exchange

WasteXWasteX

February 28 – March 1, 2005February 28 – March 1, 2005

OutlineOutline• Purpose

Prove the concept of data exchange between states using the Node

• Business AreaInterstate Hazardous Waste shipments

• WasteX Node demonstrationWA to OR and OR to WA and WA to WA

• Next StepsExample Generic InterfacePrototype Manifest Discrepancy Report

• Conclusions • Recommendations• eFiling in Washington – impacts for the Node

PurposePurpose

Prove the concept of data exchange between states using the National Environmental Information Exchange Network (NEIEN)

• Is the technology needed available?

• What is the level of effort?

• Build the flow without a national standard?

• Can we create a new flow using the existing Nodes at two states (WA and OR)?

Business Area: Interstate Shipments of Business Area: Interstate Shipments of Hazardous Waste (HW)Hazardous Waste (HW)

• Those who generate HW must send it to a Treatment Storage Disposal Recycling facility (TSDR) which is permitted for that type of waste.

• Large Quantity Generators must report on a Generation and Management form (GM).

• TSDR s must report the waste they receive on a Waste Received form (WR).

Business Area: Interstate Shipments of Business Area: Interstate Shipments of Hazardous Waste (HW)Hazardous Waste (HW)

• The “Implementer” (Tribe, State…) must have a solution to manage the information, and provide data to EPA every other year (2001, 2003 …)

• EPA stores data in the Biennial Report System (BRS) – now part of RCRAInfo.

• BRS provides some reconciliation between implementers, but only every other year at a company level.

Hazardous Waste Movement from WashingtonHazardous Waste Movement from Washington79,982,082 pounds 10,141 manifests

Data Management of Hazardous Waste Data Management of Hazardous Waste Shipments (HW)Shipments (HW)

• The Node presents an opportunity for On-Line data sharing of HW manifest data: “Did they receive what we sent?”

• Implementers can place data on their Network Node as soon as it is available

Washington and OregonWashington and Oregon

• Washington State and Oregon require annual submissions of data.

• Track HW shipments by manifest.

• WA and OR have similar solutions.

Manifest Tracking Systems Evolution Manifest Tracking Systems Evolution between WA and ORbetween WA and OR

TurboWaste.Net

HazWaste.NetHWIMSy

HWIMSy

Washington

Oregon

NodeNode

NodeNode

WasteXWasteX

HW Movement between WA – OR HW Movement between WA – OR (WA TurboWaste.Net data only)(WA TurboWaste.Net data only)

WA

OR

2,448 manifests

43,340,000 lbs

3,712 manifests

32,760,000 lbs

WasteX Application TopologyWasteX Application Topology

Node Flow Example (WasteX Query)Node Flow Example (WasteX Query)Requestor Provider (STATE)

AGENCYNODE

PROGR.RDBMS

QueryProcessor

Data Request

•Authenticate at NAAS

•Perform Query

Node Management

•Request received

•Account/Service Authorized at NAAS

•Request logged (Access, Query, Parameters etc.)

Data Transformation

•Query parameters parsed

•Relational data retrieved

•XML transformation

•Schema validation

AGENCYNODE

Node Management

•Request results logged

•XML payload returned

Data Received

•Response logged

•Payload staged

Data available to the user

TurboWaste.NetApplication

TurboWaste.NetApplication

PartnerNode

Node FacadeRequestor

ClientApplication

Node Data

Node Admin

Node Data Sources

Submit

GetStatus

Query

Authenticate

Execute

Notify

Download

Solicit

NodePing

GetServices

Node Engine

Transaction

Service

Fault

AccountClient

Application

Node Information Flow DiagramNode Information Flow Diagram

Let’s take the Node for a test driveLet’s take the Node for a test drive

TurboWaste main screenTurboWaste main screen

Node DemoNode Demo

WAD041337130 Enter ID #

Click Search

Company Search ResultsCompany Search Results

Node DemoNode Demo

Click View Reporting History

Company Waste Stream ListingCompany Waste Stream Listing

Node DemoNode Demo

Click View for a single waste stream

Waste Shipment Detail – Link to NodeWaste Shipment Detail – Link to Node

Node DemoNode Demo

Link icon means

Node link

WA – WAWA – OROR – WAOR - OR

WasteX Results - Matching WA Generator and WA TSDWasteX Results - Matching WA Generator and WA TSD

Node DemoNode Demo

All shipment data reported received at TSD Facility

Selected Generator

Node DemoNode Demo

Shipments sent by Generator Data from Oregon Node

Selected TSD

Shipments received by TSD

WasteX Results - Matching WA TSD and OR GeneratorWasteX Results - Matching WA TSD and OR Generator

Opens the data for our field inspectors

Data Sharing ChallengesData Sharing Challenges

Exposes data quality problems

Opens the data for review

Exposes data quality problems

Next Steps for WasteXNext Steps for WasteX

• Is WasteX the right application for determining manifest discrepancy reporting?

• Develop simple tool for determining manifest discrepancies

• Develop a generic interface concept

• Define requirements

Concept: Manifest Discrepancy ReportConcept: Manifest Discrepancy Report

QUANTITYMANIFESTSHIPDATEGENERATOR RECEIVER

QUANTITYMANIFESTSHIPDATERECEIVER GENERATOR

It’s the differences in manifests and quantities that we are interested in

Manifest Discrepancy Summary ReportManifest Discrepancy Summary Report

Concept for a report that

identifies the magnitude of

the problem, if any.

Manifest Discrepancy Detail ReportManifest Discrepancy Detail Report

RecID WAD020257945

Data

GenID Manifest_NR GenShipmentDT RecShipmentDT Sum of GenPounds Sum of RecPounds

ORD000773937 5718 . 11/20/2003 0 1761.41

82209 . 12/20/2002 0 24209.35

86058 . 3/24/2003 0 23819.04

94779 . 9/15/2003 0 33696.94

99299 . 12/5/2003 0 36859.46

ORD000773937 Total 0 120346.2

WA9214053465 2290A . 10/17/2002 0 5020

3028A 1/28/2003 1/28/2003 2377 4190

3044L 2/13/2003 2/13/2003 1 3720

3097A . 4/7/2003 0 5660

3099L 4/9/2003 4/9/2003 2502 1460

3162A . 6/11/2003 0 13860

3216A 8/4/2003 8/4/2003 3753 360

Receiving TSDR

Sending Generator Manifest Number

Date Generator Shipped

Date Received at Facility

Sent Pounds Received Pounds

Manifest Discrepancy Detail ReportManifest Discrepancy Detail Report

RecID WAD020257945

Data

GenID Manifest_NR GenShipmentDT RecShipmentDT Sum of GenPounds Sum of RecPounds

ORD000773937 5718 . 11/20/2003 0 1761.41

82209 . 12/20/2002 0 24209.35

86058 . 3/24/2003 0 23819.04

94779 . 9/15/2003 0 33696.94

99299 . 12/5/2003 0 36859.46

ORD000773937 Total 0 120346.2

WA9214053465 2290A . 10/17/2002 0 5020

3028A 1/28/2003 1/28/2003 2377 4190

3044L 2/13/2003 2/13/2003 1 3720

3097A . 4/7/2003 0 5660

3099L 4/9/2003 4/9/2003 2502 1460

3162A . 6/11/2003 0 13860

3216A 8/4/2003 8/4/2003 3753 360

Missing Data (Yellow Boxes): Lost shipments Data not reported by Generator

Missing Pounds ? No data from Generator

Extra Pounds: TSD reported 120,346 pounds

3234A 8/25/2003 8/25/2003 2502 5640

3254A 9/11/2003 9/11/2003 3367 4780

3336A 12/2/2003 . 15463 0

WA9214053465 Total 29965 44690

WAD038529137 9628 1/31/2003 1/31/2003 4770.48 4770.48

2533B . 12/9/2003 0 17514

WAD038529137 Total 4770.48 22284.48

WAD041337130 M0053 1/17/2002 1/17/2002 34235 34194

M0055 1/16/2002 1/16/2002 20207 20182.8

M0199 3/7/2002 3/7/2002 28348.25 28314.3

M0200 3/7/2002 3/7/2002 26686.6 26654.64

M0201 3/9/2002 3/9/2002 30310.5 30274.2

M0229 3/17/2002 3/18/2002 27555 27522

M0231 3/13/2002 3/13/2002 39658.32 41192.93

M0360 4/30/2002 5/1/2002 18370 18348

M0373 5/2/2002 5/2/2002 4342 4170

M0447 6/1/2002 6/3/2002 26177.25 26145.9

M0519 6/21/2002 6/21/2002 11695.84 11442.48

Prototype: Manifest Discrepancy ReportPrototype: Manifest Discrepancy ReportGenerator reported 29,965 lbs TSD reported 44,690 pounds

Difference: 14,725 poundsWhere is the error? Generator, TSDF, or a little of both.

Notice this

Company

N1030 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 21125.5 21100.2

N1125 11/7/2003 11/7/2003 1503 1417.8

N1192 12/5/2003 12/5/2003 40080 40032

N1193 12/5/2003 12/5/2003 40080 40032

N1210 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 21125.5 21100.2

N1256 12/23/2003 12/23/2003 29548.15 29512.76

WAD041337130 Total 933176.38 927564.63

Grand Total 967911.86 1114885.31

Concept: Manifest Discrepancy ReportConcept: Manifest Discrepancy Report

No Missing Manifests

Generator reports 933,176 poundsTSDF reports 927,564 poundsDifference: 5,612 pounds

0.6 %

Generic InterfaceGeneric Interface

Generators of HW TSDR Facilities Receiving HW

EXCHANGE NODEMulti-State Hazardous Waste Tracking

1 to 1Enter Generator EPA Site ID Number

All Generators

Washington

Oregon

Enter TSDR EPA Site ID Number

All TSDR Facilities

Washington

Oregon

W A D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 O R D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Match to

Enter Generator EPA Site ID Number

All Generators

Washington

Oregon


All TSDR Facilities

Washington

Oregon

________________________

O R D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 to Many

Enter Generator EPA Site ID Number

All Generators

Washington

Oregon


All TSDR Facilities

Washington

Oregon

________________________

O R D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Many to 1

ConclusionsConclusions

• Technology is here

• Methods and techniques are fairly straight forward

• Opens new business opportunities for state cooperation

• Possible to create a data flow without a National Data Standard

• All partners must agree

• Be willing to rework to make a national standard

Follow sound project

management principles

Recommendation #1Recommendation #1


It has to be Win-Win

for everybody


Know where

you are going


WasteX shows WasteX shows that there are that there are many ways to many ways to use the Node use the Node capabilitiescapabilities

eFiling and the NodeeFiling and the Node

TurboWaste.NetTurboWaste.Net

ROIROI(Return On Investment)(Return On Investment)

TurboWaste.Net Impacts the NodeTurboWaste.Net Impacts the Node

Electronic Records Comprise 92% of the Electronic Records Comprise 92% of the Data ReportedData Reported

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

Number of Total Shipments Reported

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Electronic Data Comprises the Bulk of Our Data

Paper

eFile

Companies Reporting Electronically Companies Reporting Electronically Rises DramaticallyRises Dramatically

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

# o

f C

om

pan

ies

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Increase in HW eFiling in Washington

Paper

eFile

TurboWaste.NetTurboWaste Access Version

Reporting Deadline 3/1/05

TurboWaste.Net is Changing Our Daily TurboWaste.Net is Changing Our Daily Business Practices in One Year Business Practices in One Year

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

# o

f C

om

pan

ies

"Jan 1 - Feb 25, 2004" "Jan 1 - Feb 25, 2005"

Comparing Paper and eFiling of HW Reports for the Same Period

Paper

eFile

91%

18%

How Did We Achieve These Results ?How Did We Achieve These Results ?

• Listening to clients needs

• Investing in enhancements

• Client outreach

• Training

• Being flexible with deadlines

Let’s take TurboWaste.Net for a SpinLet’s take TurboWaste.Net for a Spin


Welcome to TurboWaste.Net


Login


User Profile


My Sites

Welcome to TurboWaste.Net

TurboWaste.NetTurboWaste.NetSite Profile

TurboWaste.NetTurboWaste.NetReporting History

TurboWaste.NetTurboWaste.NetSite ID Form

TurboWaste.NetTurboWaste.NetGM / WR Simple Version

TurboWaste.NetTurboWaste.NetGM / WR Expert Version

TurboWaste.NetTurboWaste.NetAnnual Report Checklist

Key Features of TurboWaste.NetKey Features of TurboWaste.Net

- PIN security and encrypted passwords

- Administrators can easily add users and change permissions

- Administrators / Data Entry Staff responsible for many sites can see all their sites on one screen

- Three roles: Administrators ; Data Entry; View Only

- Only Administrators can submit data


- Complete data validation rules in place

- Data can be imported, copied from an earlier year, or hand entered

- Expert versions of application screens for rapid data entry

- Simple versions of screens for drop down menus


- Data is not available to Ecology for view until it is officially submitted or authorized for view by the client

- Annual Reporting can be combined with notification revisions and withdrawals (one Site ID form, multi purpose)

- First notification and ownership changes require paper submittals

-TurboWaste staff have administrator rights

- Ecology staff with “view only” rights on submitted data

What our clients are saying about What our clients are saying about TurboWaste.NetTurboWaste.Net

President of EnviroTech…..”I want to complain about your TurboWaste, it’s too easy !” Beth Gilbertson - Kent School District - she has many sites and used it last year. She absolutely loves the new improvements we made this year! I submitted two weeks early. Why? Because the turbowaste program now works so well. It has matured over the years, and your efforts have now really paid off. My hat's off to the turbowaste staff.

Submitted in TurboWaste.Net Submitted in TurboWaste.Net Node AvailableNode Available

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

# o

f C

om

pan

ies

"Jan 1 - Feb 25, 2004" "Jan 1 - Feb 25, 2005"

Comparing Paper and eFiling of HW Reports for the Same Period

Paper

eFile

91%

18%

CreditsCredits

Debbie Stewart – WA Department of Ecology

Miles Neale – WA Department of Ecology

Bill Kellum – WA Department of Ecology

Mitch West - Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Glen Carr – Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

Windsor Solutions Inc. (Lake Oswego, OR)

Ed Bentley [email protected] 360.407.6466

Dan Kruger [email protected] 360.407.6728

Thank YouThank You

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Multi-State Hazardous Waste Information Exchange WasteX February 28 – March 1, 2005.

Documents

Transcript of Multi-State Hazardous Waste Information Exchange WasteX February 28 – March 1, 2005.