Multi-level governance through regional adaptation partnerships Anja Bauer and Reinhard Steurer
description
Transcript of Multi-level governance through regional adaptation partnerships Anja Bauer and Reinhard Steurer
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
Multi-level governance through regional adaptation partnerships
Anja Bauer and Reinhard Steurer
BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life SciencesVienna, Austria
Symposium „The Governance of Adaptation“ Amsterdam, 22-23 March 2012
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
The Go-Adapt project
Partnerships as new governance approaches
Regional Adaptation Partnerships in Canada and the UK
Scope of collaboration
Objects of coordination
Ways of coordination
Conclusions
Orientation
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
The GO-ADAPT project
General Funded by the Austrian Climate Research Program (ACRP), 1st Call Duration: April 2010 - December 2012 Partner: Austrian Environment Agency
Objective Analyse the Governance of Adaptation to Climate Change, i.e. how governments develop and
implement adaptation policies – focus on institutions and governing processes, not on policy contents
Work packages Stock taking survey: provides an overview of how 10 OECD countries tackle four governance
challenges that emerge when developing adaptation policies Case studies: analyse in how far selected governance approaches contribute to adaptation policies Extended literature review: aims to draw lessons from thematically related policy fields that are
characterised by similar governance challenges Synthesis of results: compares the case studies (cross-case analysis) in the light of the lessons
drawn from the extended literature review
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
Partnerships as new governance approaches
Partnerships Collaborative arrangements in a broadly defined issue area Heterogeneous actors from different levels and societal spheres
Expectations Effective, inclusive and legitimate mode of societal governing Innovative solutions and policies Go-Adapt- Survey -> important governance approach – vertical integration, stakeholder participation
Questions In which way and to which extent do regional partnerships serve as a coordination mechanism
between different levels (local, regional, national) as well as between societal domains? In how far do partnerships contribute to climate change adaptation in terms of adaptive capacities
and adaptation policies?
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
• Size of the countries and regions: Region ≠ Region
• Political systems: CA=federal state vs. UK=unitary state• Governance perspective: level between national /federal level and local level
Cautious comparison
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
The casesUK: Regional Climate Change Partnerships (RCCP)London Climate Change Partnership, Climate SouthEast, Climate
South West
Canada: Regional Adaptation Collaboratives (RAC)
RAC British Columbia, Prairies RAC, RAC Atlantic
Since 1999 11 partnerships By regional bodies, supported by Defra, EA, UKCIP Investigating and advising on the regional and local
impacts of CC and the development of respective responses
Broad thematic focus: tourism, planning, water, businesses, …
Since 2009 (3 years) 6 collaboratives RAC-Program by NRCan Capacitate decision-makers to make policy,
operational, and management changes in response to CC
Narrower thematic focus: water management
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
Vertical coordination Horizontal coordination between public & private actors
Actors & coordination pathes
National authorities
Regional/ provincial authorities
Local authorities
Public Agencies
NGOs Research Industry
RAC BC + Prairies RAC + RAC Atlantic + Climate SouthEast
() + +
Climate SouthWest
() + +
London CCP + + +
- Partner: taking part in activities of the partnership - Key partner: also involved in steering the partnership+ - Main target group of the activities/products of the partnership
H
ori
zon
tal coord
in.
betw
een
part
ners
hip
s
Horizontal coordination
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
Substance of coordination
Vertical coordination in the public domain: Sub-national actors co-shape national adaptation policies National actors coordinate adaptation policies at regional and local levels
Horizontal coordination between sectors/policy domains …. …
Horizontal coordination between public and private actors …. …
Horizontal coordination betwen partnerships …. …
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
Object of coordination - Policies
Local policies and planningVariety of sectors: infrastructure, housing, land management
Indirectly by guidance and tools, directly involved in planning processes (esp. London)
Regional policiesStrategies (adaptation and other sectors, e.g. water)
Implementation mechanism for adaptation strategy (UK)
National policiesRestricted to adaptation policies
Providing local and regional perspective in the policy formulationDelivery mechanisms for national adaptation policy
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
Object of coordination – Adaptive capacities
Building the knowledge base
Providing guidance
Facilitating networking
Fostering learning
Raising awareness
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
Process of coordination
Means and structures of coordination:• Management & organizational bodies: Steering Committee, Executive Group, etc., • Working groups, projects• Workshops, trainings, events• National level: Funding & coordination bodies
Modes of coordination – vertical: CA: to-down, hierarchy transmission of national agenda/policy to regions, via national
programme; close supervision by NRCan UK: bottom-up, mutual interaction patterns
Modes of coordination – horizontal: In CA & UK: Network governance: voluntary, trust, consensus, identification, little competition
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
Conclusions
Partnerships as institutional response to the multi-level governance challenge of adaptation Important coordination mechanism for actors between and within levels Many activities, mainly capacity building and coordination – the latter also aiming
at influencing policies Aim at informing decision-making at various levels
Distinct patterns of governing through partnerships Limited project vs Continuous partnership Closed vs open membership Government vs led - stakeholder-led Driven by national agenda vs driven by regional and local needs Hierarchical, one-sided steering vs network mode, two sided relationship
Bauer, Steurer: Regional adaptation partnerships in Canada and the UK
Thank you!
Anja Bauer, Reinhard Steurer [email protected], [email protected]
BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life SciencesVienna, Austria
http://www.wiso.boku.ac.at/go-adapt.html