MTC Students Portfolio in Statistics 2013

8/22/2019 MTC Students Portfolio in Statistics 2013

1/14

MANILA TYTANA COLLEGES

Pres. Diosdado Macapagal Blvd., Metropolitan Park, Pasay City

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCESDEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS

1st Semester AY 2013 2014

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICS

Expected Output Expected Date of Submission

Portfolio 1 Part 1 July 1 5, 2013

Portfolio 1 Part 2 July 1 5, 2013

Portfolio 2 July 8 12, 2013



PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION

Portfolio 5 August 5 9, 2013

Portfolio 6 August 12 16, 2013

Portfolio 7 August 19 23, 2013MIDTERM EXAMINATION

Portfolio 8 September 23 27, 2013

Portfolio 9 September 30 October 4, 2013

Portfolio 10 October 7 11, 2013

FINAL EXAMINATION

Components of the Expected Output:

Portfolio 1(Part 1): Project Title and Background of the Problem/Project(Part 2): Theory of the Project Concept/Study Paradigm

Portfolio 2: Sample Questionnaire

Portfolio 3: Tabulation of Data Gathered from the Respondents

Portfolio 4: Demographic Profile of the Respondents and Response to OtherQuestions

Frequency Distribution

Data Presentation

Data Interpretation

Measures of Central Tendency

Measures of Variability

Interpretation

Portfolio 5: Statement of the Problem (not less than 3 statements)

Determining the dependent variables

Determining the independent variables

Identifying the difference variables

Identifying the relationship variables


2/14

Portfolio 6: Scope and Delimitation/Manageability

Number of Study Participants

Inclusion Criteria

Statistical Treatment

Portfolio 7: Hypotheses

Measures of Difference

Measures of Correlation

Portfolio 8: Measures of Differences

Using t-test

Using One-way ANOVA with post-hoc tests (Scheffe + Tukey HSD)

Findings (There is or There is no)

Conclusion (Accept or Reject)

Interpretation

PASW Printed Output

Portfolio 9: Measures of Correlations Using Pearson

Using Chi-Square (include the contingency table)

Findings (There is. or There is no.)

Conclusion (Accept or Reject)

Portfolio 10: Matrix Summary of Conclusions (Measures of Differences)Matrix Summary of Conclusions (Measures of Correlations)


3/14

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC /BIOSTATISTICSPORTFOLIO 1 (PARTS 1 and 2)

Portfolio 1(Part 1): Project Title and Background of the Problem/Project

PART 1. PROJECT TITLE:

A PROFILE ON THE LEVEL OF SELF-ESTEEM AND SATISFACTION OF BS NURSING STUDENTS FROM AND

BETWEEN COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY A AND COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY B*

*(The title must be originally conceptualized and prepared by the bearer of the study to be checked by their instructor)

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM/PROJECT:

A study was conducted, gathered in equal proportion from the nursing students of two schools namelyCollege/University A and College/University B, the first one with an ISO 9001;2008 Quality Management and CHEDDeregulated Status, while the second one bearing the CHED Autonomous Status and the prestigious IQUAME mark.

College/University A, a private Catholic sectarian university whose famous motto Education with a purposehas avery strong humanitarian message, was founded by an American Physicist on the year 1912. Originally a school for liberaarts, has expanded into a myriad of courses which includes Architecture, Sciences, Business, Law and the latest addition ishealthcare (Nursing, Caregiver). It currently has a student population which is mostly from economic classes B, C and somefrom D and E.

On the other hand, the College/University A was founded by a bar topnotcher in 1940. The school laid down itsobjectives: (1) to maintain high standard of instruction; (2) to bring within the reach of the masses the blessings of highereducation; and (3) to cooperate with the Philippine government in the implementation of its amelioration programs.College/University A committed itself to educating and developing men and women who could turn the wheels of progressand industry. It offers courses such as Engineering, Architecture, Commerce, Liberal Arts, Nursing and is considered tooffer one of the lowest tuition rates among the private universities and colleges in the National Capital Region, which is astrong reflection of one of its core values. Thus, majority of its student population comes from economic classes C to E.

*Personal experience, readings or general perspective should be included in the background. This may include relevant statistics andpersonal reason why the bearers of the study chose their topic of interest*Include the research locale, the respondents and especially the objectives of the study*May end the background with the topic by restating it


4/14

PART 2. THEORY OF THE PROJECT:

Satisfaction and self-esteem has been a subject of study by various disciplines such as sociologists, academicianspsychologists and even capitalists. The last group believes that there is a direct relationship between satisfaction and self-esteem, whose ultimate end is for a more improved productivity on the part of the workforce. From a human interests pointof view, instead of the productivity aspect, the importance of the relationship is to learn whether happiness with onesactivity is related to ones self-esteem. Thus, regardless of whatever status, the existence of a strong satisfaction and self-esteem relationship is very evident in almost all studies that were conducted.

The Rutherfords Model/Theory is based on the understanding that a person will take a specific action if that personexperiences low self-esteem if he is not satisfied in a particular task or work given to him and on the other hand, he assignsto another person.

The Rutherfords Model/Theory is used in the study to validate the relationship between self-esteem andsatisfaction as well as to provide additional knowledge about the importance of its relationship to its respondents to increasetheir awareness.

PROJECT CONCEPT/STUDY PARADIGM

In this study, the researchers will aim to determine the answers to the following specific problems: first, theresearchers will gather the demographic profile of the respondents which will include the age, gender, classification ofcollege/university, parents occupation, educational level, family monthly income and religion; secondly, the researchers wildetermine the level of self-esteem and satisfaction of the students. Lastly, the respondents will determine if there is asignificant difference between the demographic profile of the respondents and their levels of self-esteem and satisfaction aswell as if there is a significant correlation between the respondents level of self-esteem and satisfaction.

*The theory of the project must include the theory, concept or model which can be used as a foundation of the study. The theory must bepresented in narrative form.* Discuss the theory or the source of concept where the concept of the study is anchored* Provide discussions on the contribution of the theory to the field of specialization being undertaken. Discuss also the use relative to the

proposed study. Focus on the discussion of the theory itself.


5/14

MANILA TYTANA COLLEGES

Pres. Diosdado Macapagal Blvd., Metropolitan Park, Pasay City

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCESDEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS

1st Semester AY 2013 2014

RUBRIC IN RATING THE STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BIOSTATISTICS/BASIC STATISTICS

Task Objective:Each student has to identify a research topic related to their field of specialization as indicated in the course syllabus. The student should be able to analyze the gathered data related to the topic chosen and appropriate i n ones field ofspecialization. The preparation of the work should satisfy the criteria specified in this scoring rubric.

Dimensions/Criteria/IndicatorsLevels of Performance

Score/Percentage4Excellent

3Very Good/Very Satisfactory

2Good/Satisfactory

1Poor

A. Time Management (10%) Submitted two (2) days beforethe date agreed upon forsubmission

Submitted one (1) daybefore the agreed date forsubmission

Submitted on the dateagreed upon for submission

Submitted one (1) or moredays after the agreed upondate for submission

B. Completeness of Required Information (30%)

Information required in the portfolio based on the specified criteria cited in theguidelines

All of the required information

were given

Many of the required

information was indicated(about 75% was indicated)

Some of the required


Few of the required


C. Accuracy of Data and Acceptability of Results (45%)The paper report submitted will gauge its accuracy. Accuracy refers to the correctness of theinformation cited in the paper report.1. The researcher/s made use the correct/appropriate statistical test applicable to the

respective research question/data2. The given findings in the paper report are correct based on the PASW results.3. The conclusions in the paper report are strongly based on the findings

Satisfies the three (3)indicators

Satisfies only two (2) of thegiven indicators

Satisfies only one (1) of thegiven indicators

Satisfies none of the givenindicators

D. Mechanics (10%)1. Work is free from grammatical errors2. Work is free from errors in spelling/punctuations3. Work is neat and presentable

Satisfies the three (3)indicators

Satisfies only two (2) of thegiven indicators

Satisfies only one (1) of thegiven indicators

Satisfies none of the givenindicators

E. Packaging/Format (5%)1. Short bond paper/Book Bound* (*at the end of the semester)2. Cover page is made up of fluorescent paper3. The specified format should be reflected on the cover page.4. Pages are paginated and report is provided with table of contents*5. Summary is in matrix form as specified in the format6. Font is easy to read and size 12, 1 spaced and 1 inches margin in all sides

7. Scoring rubric is attached in the portfolio

Satisfies the seven (7)indicators

Satisfies only five (5) or six(6) of the given indicators

Satisfies only three (3) orfour (4) of the given indicators

Satisfies only one (1) or two(2) of the given indicators


6/14

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC STATISTICS /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICSPORTFOLIO 2 SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE

Respondent Code No. __________

SURVEY

Good day! I would like to get your honest opinion related to your activity which will only take five minutes of your time. Restbe assured that everything stated here will be treated with utmost confidentiality. These will be used solely as inputs for thecourse requirement in statistics.

(Name of the Researcher/s

PART A. Basic Personal Information

A.1. Name (Optional, print name please)

____________________________________________________________________________

A.2. Gender(please tick one only) ( )Male ( ) FemaleA.3. Religion (please tick one only)

( ) Roman Catholic( ) Non-Catholic

A.4. Age (please tick one only where your age belongs)

( ) 20 30 years old ( ) 51 60 years old( ) 31 40 years old ( ) 61 years old and above

( ) 41 50 years old

A.5. Educational Attainment

( ) Elementary Graduate ( ) College Degree( ) High School Graduate ( ) Masters Degree( ) Vocational Course ( ) Doctorate Degree

A.6. Net Monthly IncomeRange (take home pay/net profit, less of government taxes)

( ) below Php 10,000.00 ( ) Php 30,001 Php 40,000

( ) Php 10,001 Php 20,000 ( ) Php 40,001 Php 50,000( ) Php 20,001 Php 30,000 ( ) Php 50,001 and above

PART B. Self-Esteem Scale. The followingare various statements related to your activity in school. Please ENCIRCLEonly one from 4 (Strongly Agree) to 1 (Strongly Disagree) on each of the statements, which you think are nearest to yourpoint of view. There are no right nor wrong answers.

Statements StronglyAgree

Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

B.1. I feel good about my studies. 4 3 2 1


7/14



B.2. On the whole, I get along well with my otherclassmates in school.

4 3 2 1

B.3. I am proud of my ability to cope with difficultiesin school.

4 3 2 1

B.4. When I feel uncomfortable in school, I knowhow to handle it.

4 3 2 1

B.5. I can tell that my classmates in school are gladto have me there.

4 3 2 1

B.6. I know Ill be able to cope with my studies foras long as I want.

4 3 2 1

B.7. I am proud of my relationship with myprofessors in school.

4 3 2 1

B.8. I am confident that I can handle my studieswithout constant assistance.

4 3 2 1

B.9. I feel like I make a useful contribution atschool.

4 3 2 1

B.10. I can tell that my classmates respect me. 4 3 2 1

PART C. Satisfaction Scale. The followingare various statements related to your activity in school. Please ENCIRCLEonly one from 4 (Strongly Agree) to 1 (Strongly Disagree) on each of the statements, which you think are nearest to yourpoint of view. There are no right nor wrong answers.



C.1. What grades I earn in school is enough topass all of my subjects.

4 3 2 1

C.2. What grades I earn in school meets my short-term expectations/ goals in life.

4 3 2 1

C.3. The grades that I have right now reflects myeducational experiences.

4 3 2 1

C.4. I feel secure with the grades that I haveearned so far.

4 3 2 1

C.5. The grades I earn in school is fair enough. 4 3 2 1

C.6. I feel that where I am now has improvedcompared to the previous year.

4 3 2 1

C.7. I believe that I gained a wealth of knowledgefrom my present school, which I could use for myfuture plans.

4 3 2 1

C.8. I feel that the school administration did its partin helping me improve my grades in school.

4 3 2 1

END OF THE SURVEY THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRECIOUS TIME.

*strictly follow the given format*questionnaire can be taken from the internet*items in the questionnaire should cover the four levels of measurement such as nominal, interval, ratio and interval*possible problem statements must be culled out and must be statistically analyzed covering the descriptive and inferential statistics*if in doubt about the questionnaire, please consult your respective pro fessor


8/14

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC STATISTICS /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICSPORTFOLIO 3 TABULATION OF DATA GATHERED FROM THE RESPONDENTS*

RespondentCode No.

Gender Religion Age EA NMIR SE1 SE2 SE3 SE4 SE5 SE6 SE7 SE8 SE9 SE10 SE_AVE SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8 SS_AVE

1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.0 0 3 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 2.00

2 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 1.4 0 3 2 2 4 3 2 4 2 2.75

3 1 1 4 2 5 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 4 2 4 2.3 0 3 2 2 4 3 2 3 2 2.63

4 2 2 3 4 6 2 2 4 2 3 4 3 4 2 2 2.8 0 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.25

5 2 2 5 4 6 3 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 2 3.3 0 1 3 4 4 2 3 4 3 3.00

6 1 2 2 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3.5 0 1 2 4 2 1 4 4 3 2.63

7 2 1 3 2 3 3 4 4 4 2 3 3 4 4 4 3.5 0 2 4 4 2 3 4 4 4 3.38

8 2 2 5 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 1 3.0 0 2 4 4 2 4 1 2 4 2.88

9 2 2 1 4 5 4 3 4 3 4 3 2 3 3 1 3.0 0 2 4 1 3 4 2 2 1 2.38

10 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 3 4 4 3 2 3 4 2 3.10 2 2 1 4 4 3 3 3 2.75

11 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 4 1 3 2 1 1 3 1.90 4 2 3 4 2 4 1 3 2.88

12 1 2 5 1 1 3 1 3 4 1 3 4 2 1 4 2.60 4 1 2 4 1 4 1 3 2.50

13 2 1 5 5 2 4 1 3 1 2 4 4 2 4 1 2.60 3 3 2 1 3 4 4 4 3.0014 2 2 5 5 5 4 2 2 1 4 4 4 3 4 2 3.00 3 4 2 1 3 2 1 1 2.13

15 1 1 3 5 4 4 3 2 2 4 4 4 1 4 2 3.00 4 4 4 2 4 3 1 1 2.88

16 1 2 4 5 3 1 4 2 3 1 1 4 3 1 2 2.20 4 4 1 2 4 4 2 2 2.88

17 1 1 1 2 3 1 4 4 3 1 1 4 3 1 4 2.60 1 1 1 4 4 1 4 4 2.50

18 1 1 2 2 5 1 4 4 4 2 1 1 4 3 4 2.80 1 1 2 4 3 1 4 4 2.50

19 2 2 5 3 6 1 3 1 4 4 1 1 1 2 1 1.90 1 2 3 4 2 2 4 4 2.75

20 2 1 2 4 5 3 1 1 4 4 1 1 2 2 2 2.10 1 3 4 3 1 2 1 2 2.13

21 2 1 2 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1.50 2 3 4 4 1 4 2 2 2.75

22 2 2 3 4 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2.10 2 3 4 1 3 3 2 4 2.75

23 1 2 3 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 3 1 4 2 2 3.00 2 4 1 2 4 4 2 4 2.88

24 1 1 3 4 5 2 3 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 1 3.10 3 1 1 1 4 2 3 4 2.38

25 1 1 4 5 6 2 1 2 2 4 4 4 1 4 1 2.50 4 1 1 2 4 1 3 2 2.25

26 2 1 5 4 1 4 3 3 3 1 4 2 1 1 4 2.60 `1 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 1.86

27 2 1 5 4 1 2 4 4 4 3 4 3 2 1 1 2.80 1 2 4 2 3 1 4 4 2.63

28 2 1 1 4 2 3 4 1 4 3 1 1 3 1 1 2.20 2 4 4 2 4 1 4 4 3.13

29 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 4 4 1 4 3 4 4 3.00 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 1 3.38

30 2 1 2 2 4 1 2 2 2 4 1 1 4 4 1 2.20 2 2 2 4 1 4 1 1 2.13

LEGEND:

EA Educational Attainment Gender: 1 Male 2 Female NMIR:NMIR Net Monthly Income Range

Religion:1 Roman Catholic 2 Non-Catholic 1 below Php10000 2 Php10001 to Php 20000

SE Self-Esteem Age: 1 20 to 30 2 31 to 40 3 41 to 50 3 Php 20001 to Php 30000 4 Php 30001 to Php 40000SE_AVE Self-Esteem Average 4 51 to 60 5 61 yrs. and above 5 Php 40001 to Php 50000 6 Php 50001 and aboveSS Satisfaction Scale EA: 1 Elementary 2 High School 3 Vocational SE and SS:SS_AVE Satisfaction Average 4 College 5 Masters 6 Doctorate 1 Strongly Agree 2 Agree

3 Disagree 4 Strongly Disagree

*All entries must be entered in the Microsoft Excel.*All averages must be in two decimal places (i.e. SE_AVE and SS_AVE)*Do not forget to fill-in all rows and columns. All legends must be placed below the tfor reference.*The sequence of the data to be tabulated in rows and columns should strictarrangement of information found in the questionnaire.*There must be at least 30 respondents in the survey to be conducted.*If in doubt about the tabulated data, please consult your respective professor.


9/14

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC STATISTICS /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICSPORTFOLIO 4 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS AND

RESPONSE TO OTHER QUESTIONS

Table 4.1 Respondents Profile Based on Gender

Gender Frequency Percentage

Male 14 46.7

Female 16 53.3Total 30 100.0

Table 4.1 presents the profile of the respondents based on gender. It is shown that 46.7% or fourteen (14) of therespondents are males while 53.3% or sixteen (16) of the respondents are females.

Table 4.2 Respondents Profile Based on Religion*Table 4.3 Respondents Profile Based on Age*

Table 4.4 Respondents Profile Based on Educational Attainment

Educational Attainment Frequency PercentageElementary 4 13.3

High School 7 23.3

Vocational 2 6.7

College 11 36.7

Masters 6 20.0

Total 30 100.0

Table 4.4 presents the profile of the respondents based on educational attainment. It is shown that 36.7% or eleven(11) of the respondents are College graduates while only 6.7% or two (2) of the respondents are graduates of vocationalcourses.

Table 4.5 Respondents Profile Based on Net Monthly Income Range

Net Monthly Income Range Frequency Percentage

Below Php 10000 6 20.0

Php 10001 to Php 20000 4 13.3

Php 20001 to Php 30000 6 20.0

Php 30001 to Php 40000 4 13.3

Php 40001 to Php 50000 6 20.0

Php 50001 and above 4 13.3Total 30 100.0

Table 4.5 presents the profile of the respondents based on net monthly income range. It is shown that three (3) ofthe net monthly income ranges such as those who are earning below Php 10000, between Php 20001 to Php 30000 andbetween Php 40001 to Php 50000 each are 20% or six (6) of the respondents while three (3) of the net monthly incomeranges such as those who are earning between Php 10001 and Php 20000, between Php 30001 and Php 40000 and Php50001 and above each are 13.3% or four (4) of the respondents.


10/14

Table 4.6 Self-Esteem of the Respondents Towards Their Activity in School

Items Mean StandardDeviation

Interpretation

On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates inschool.

2.47 1.167 Low Extent

I am proud of my ability to cope with difficulties in school. 2.43 1.194 Low Extent

When I feel uncomfortable in school, I know how to handle

it.

2.63 1.245 High Extent

I can tell that my classmates in school are glad to have methere.


I know Ill be able to cope with my studies for as long as Iwant.


I am proud of my relationship with my professors in school. 2.50 1.280 Low Extent

I am confident that I can handle my studies withoutconstant assistance.


I feel like I make a useful contribution at school. 2.60 1.163 High Extent

I can tell that my classmates respect me. 2.47 1.196 Low Extent

On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates inschool.


Composite Mean 2.55 0.613 High ExtentLegend: 1.00 1.50 Very Low Extent; 1.51 to 2.50 Low Extent; 2.51 to 3.50 High Extent; 3.51 to 4.00 Very High Extent

Table 4.6 shows the self-esteem of the respondents towards their activity in school. It is shown that the firsitem On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates in schoolhas a mean of 2.47 and a standard deviation whichis interpreted as low extent. The second item I am proud of my ability to cope with difficulties in schoolhas a mean of 2.43and a standard deviation of 1.194 which is interpreted as low extent. The third item When I feel uncomfortable in school, know how to handle it Overall, the self-esteem of the respondents has a mean of 2.55 and a standard deviation of0.613 which is interpreted as high extent.

Table 4.7 Satisfaction of the Respondents Towards Their Activity in School*

*strictly follow the given format especially the tabular presentations*Tables 4.2 and 4.3 will follow the same format of discussion; for age, the focus of the discussion wil l be only on the highest and lowest frequencies among the group*for a four-point scale, use the given ranges in the legend; for a five-point scale, make use of 1.00 1.50, 1.51 2.50, 2.51 3.50, 3.51 4.50, 4.51 5.00*Table 4.7 will have the same tabular presentation with Table 4.6 having three columns*Tables cannot be split into two or more pages. Make sure to construct the table in one page only. Adjust the first column containing the questions if necessary to present the table in jusone page.*Make sure that the complete Predictive Analysis Software (PASW) results are attached in Portfolio 4*If in doubt about the format and discussion, please consult your respective professor


11/14

PASW RESULTS:

Frequencies

Statistics

Gender Religion AgeEducationalAttainment

Net MonthlyIncomeRange

N Valid 30 30 30 30 30

Missing 0 0 0 0 0

Frequency Table

Gender

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Valid Male 14 46.7 46.7 46.7

Female 16 53.3 53.3 100.0

Total30 100.0 100.0

Religion


Percent

Valid Roman Catholic 18 60.0 60.0 60.0

Non-Catholic 12 40.0 40.0 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Age


Percent

Valid 20 to 30 yrs. old 6 20.0 20.0 20.0

31 to 40 yrs. old 7 23.3 23.3 43.3

41 to 50 yrs. old 6 20.0 20.0 63.3

51 to 60 yrs. old 3 10.0 10.0 73.3

61 yrs. old and above 8 26.7 26.7 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Educational Attainment


Percent

Valid Elementary 4 13.3 13.3 13.3

High School 7 23.3 23.3 36.7

Vocational 2 6.7 6.7 43.3

College 11 36.7 36.7 80.0

Masters 6 20.0 20.0 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0


12/14

Net Monthly Income Range


Percent

Valid below Php 10000 6 20.0 20.0 20.0

Php 10001 to Php 20000 4 13.3 13.3 33.3

Php 20001 to Php 30000 6 20.0 20.0 53.3

Php 30001 to Php 40000 4 13.3 13.3 66.7

Php 40001 to Php 50000 6 20.0 20.0 86.7

Php 50001 and above 4 13.3 13.3 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Descriptives

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.47 1.167

Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.43 1.194

Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.63 1.245

Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.93 1.230Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.77 1.278

Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.50 1.280

Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.47 1.196

Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.60 1.163

Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.47 1.196

Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.27 1.202

Ave_Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.55 .613

Valid N (listwise) 30

DescriptivesDescriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Satisfaction Scale 29 1 4 2.45 1.121








Ave_Satisfaction Scale 30 2 3 2.66 .391

Valid N (listwise) 29


13/14

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC STATISTICS /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICSPORTFOLIO 5 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The main purpose of the study is to determine the self-esteem and satisfaction of the students towards their activity in school. In particularit seeks to answer the following questions:

1. What is the demographic profile of the students in terms of: (Descriptive Statistics: Frequency and Percentage)a. Genderb. Religion

c. Aged. Educational Attainmente. Net Monthly Income Range

2. What is the level of self-esteem and satisfaction of the students? (Descriptive Statistics: Mean and Standard Deviation)3. Is there a significant correlation between work self-esteem and work satisfaction? (Inferential Statistics: Measures of Correlation)4. Is there a significant difference in the work self-esteem and work satisfaction of the respondents when they are grouped according to their

demographic profile? (Inferential Statistics: Measures of Differences)5. Is there a significant difference between schools A and B in terms of level of self-esteem and satisfaction? (Inferential Statistics

Measures of Differences)

In relation to statement of the problem number 3, the following are the dependent and independent variables with their statistical tests tobe used which will be shown in Portfolios 8 and 9:

a. Dependent Variablesa.1. Satisfactiona.2. Self-Esteem

b. Independent Variables (Demographic Aspects)

b.1. Determining the Differences as shown in Portfolio 8b.1.1. Comparison on the level of self-esteem based on the following:

b.1.1.1. Genderusing t-Test of Independent Samplesb.1.1.2. Religion using t-Test of Independent Samplesb.1.1.3. Age using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Testsb.1.1.4. Educational Attainment using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or

Tukey Testsb.1.1.5. Net Monthly Income Range using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or

Tukey Testsb.1.1.6. Comparison on the level of self esteem between schools A and B using t-Test of Independent Samples

b.1.2. Comparison on the level of satisfaction based on the following:b.1.2.1. Genderusing t-Test of Independent Samplesb.1.2.2. Religion using t-Test of Independent Samplesb.1.2.3. Age using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Testsb.1.2.4. Educational Attainment using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or

Tukey Testsb.1.2.5. Net Monthly Income Range using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or

Tukey Testsb.1.2.6. Comparison on the level of satisfaction between schools A and B using t-Test of Independent Samples

b.2. Determining the Relationship as shown in Portfolio 9

b.2.1. Level of Self Esteem versus Level of Satisfaction using the Pearson r Testb.2.2. Correlation between self-esteem and the demographic profile of the respondents using the eta correlationb.2.3. Correlation between satisfaction and the demographic profile of the respondents using the eta correlation

* Strictly follow the given format* The type of statistical tests to be used must be highlighted.* For follow-up tests, you may use either the Tukey or the Scheffe Test* If in doubt about the format and discussion, please consult your respective professor.


14/14

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN BASIC STATISTICS /BIOSTATISTICS/BUSINESS STATISTICSPORTFOLIO 6 SCOPE AND DELIMITATION/MANAGEABILITY

The study focused on the level of self-esteem and satisfaction of the students in two different schools. The study is

delimited to the students between two schools with regard to their level of self-esteem and satisfaction towards thei

activities.

There were thirty (30) student respondents involved in the study. Only those who were currently and officially

enrolled in schools A and B participated in the research.

The researchers used the quantitative descript ive method to measure the difference of the students level of self

esteem and satisfaction enrolled in schools A and B. Survey method was used to gather the demographic profile, self

esteem and satisfaction of the students in two schools.

Non-probability sampling technique was used in selecting the students who served as respondents of the study

The researchers non-randomly chose the student respondents from two different schools on the basis of their gender

religion, age, educational attainment and net monthly income rate.

The researchers adopted the questionnaire formulated by Hipolito, Fulgueras and Arcena (2013) entitled the self-

esteem scale and the satisfaction scale having a reliability of 0.89.

Statistical Treatment of Data

For measures of differences, there will be a separate hypothesis testing (either t Test of independent samples o

One Way Analysis of Variance) for the entire sample and another for each of the two schools (school A and school B).

For measures of correlation, a hypothesis testing (Pearson r or eta correlation) was conducted for the entire sample

(two schools combined).

On this manner of treatment, fifteen (15) hypotheses were formulated covering both measures of differences and

correlations.

* Discussion on the inclusion criteria must be included. The criteria for choosing the respondents must be clearly defined.

* The number of respondents, research method and the data gathering technique must be clearly specified.

* The survey instrument must be specified if this is adopted or researcher-made. It is important to take note of the reliability coefficient or the Cronbach Alpha of the research instrument

The accepted value is at least 0.85.

* The number of research hypotheses should be aligned with the ones stated in portfolio 5 covering both measures of differences and correlation.

MTC Students Portfolio in Statistics 2013

Documents

Transcript of MTC Students Portfolio in Statistics 2013