MT Continuum Status 3 Apr 12 Tiffany Dombrowski, AIM Pgm Mgr Gerry Cullison, SSP Mark Campbell, MT...
-
Upload
griselda-adams -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of MT Continuum Status 3 Apr 12 Tiffany Dombrowski, AIM Pgm Mgr Gerry Cullison, SSP Mark Campbell, MT...
MT Continuum Status
3 Apr 12
Tiffany Dombrowski, AIM Pgm MgrGerry Cullison, SSP
Mark Campbell, MT Continuum TeamJamie Stewart, AIM team
Overview• MT Continuum overview• Application to other communities• Project status• Lessons learned for other NETC
communities• SSP Electronic Classroom Control
Software Change
MT Continuum Project• Strategic Systems Programs (SSP) re-engineering 30+ week training
pipeline for TRIDENT Ballistic Submarine (SSBN) Missile Techs (MTs) into blended just-enough/just-in-time ILE-conformant Instructor Led (ILT) and Interactive Multimedia Instruction (IMI) segments
• AIM CPM and LO Module toolsets part of SSP’s baseline business process for this re-engineering
• First major end-to-end design, development, and maintenance project that’s defining CPM/LO Module business rules and data exchange mechanisms
• MT Continuum team:
– SSP - Requirements Owners, Afloat Delivery System– Contractor team – ILT development, IMI Storyboard development,
SMEs– NAWCTSD / AIM team - CPM/LO Module support– NUWC – LMS (Seaware)– LSI, Inc. - ISD and IMI design/development– CFS – CM/QA agent for SSP– Fleet – SMEs
Application to Other Communities• Based on NETC-mandated JDTA as fleet performance
requirement basis for learning content design and development
• Closely coordinated with NAVEDTRA 136 development• Hands-on production phase development of complete LO
Module ILT lessons/sections and design of IMI lessons/sections as well as definition of new JDTA/LO Module versioning concepts
• Integrated development and maintenance environment for blended, SCORM and 136-compliant learning content
• Bi-directional interface between LO Module and LSI Venus.net CBT toolset for IMI development/maint.
Project Status• Plan, Analyze and Design Completed
– JDTA– Establishment of initial 3 major projects– Revised 9-project structure
• Approval of learning objectives
• Ongoing development of ISD considerations elements as part of script-storyboard effort
• Development (production) Phase underway 15 May 11– 9 projects exported from CPM to LO Module for production
development in AIM I Rel 5.0 on fedsun– SWS AIM I instance in production at NETPDTC
Lessons Learned for Other NETC Communities
• Completion of supporting documentation in Design Phase is crucial – (IMDP, Learning Objectives, Process Documents)
• Establish standard for estimating TTT in Design Phase• Establish change request process in Design Phase• Development IMS/POA&M– crucial to support reviews• Storyboard Training – Consider Learning Curve for
Storyboarding in the LOM
SSP Electronic Classroom Control Software Change
• Background– The introduction of electronic documentation in the
early 2000’s saw the migration of a majority of paper Instructor Guides (IGs) to electronic Lesson Plans (LPs) . This required the introduction of tools (TechSight) necessary to access, present and view them – Classroom Control (software)
– In 2005 the CCS tool of choice (TechSight) was experiencing obsolescence issues. A replacement product “Elite” was selected (to address these issues) for evaluation and after some modifications for use.
SSP Electronic Classroom Control Software Change
(contd)
• Evolving requirements and obsolescence issues are forcing a Classroom Control Software change. Some of these but not all:
– Policy• DODI 1322.26 - Embedded training and distributed learning shall be
considered as the first option. • OPNAVINST 1500.76A – Navy Training Systems Requirement
Acquisition and Management • DoD directive 8500.1M – Information Assurance
– Standards• SCORM 2004• HTML 5, XML
– Software• Applications – I.E., Flash, MS Office , Java 6.4…• Operating Systems (OS) - Windows 7, 64 Bit, Windows Server 2008 64
bit
SSP Electronic Classroom Control Software Change
(contd)
• Approach– Identify and correct issues in the areas of Policy, Standards
and Software in an update to the CCS tool or in the development of a new (CCS) tool.
• Options– SSP has identified 3 potential options to address this
approach:• Update Current CCS (Elite)
• Develop New CCS
• Integrate CCS Software into LMS
SSP Electronic Classroom Control Software Change
(contd)
• Option 1: Update Current CCS (Elite)– Pros
• Update can be incremental• Low schedule risk
– Cons• Cost• Proprietary• Risk may drive redesign• Retains unused legacy capabilities
• Option 2: Develop New CCS– Pros
• Develop to Software requirements• Develop to Standards• Develop to Policies
– Cons• Cost • Schedule• Unknown Risks
SSP Electronic Classroom Control Software Change
(contd)
• Option 3: Integrate CCS into the LMS– Pros
• Update can be incremental• Low schedule risk
– LMS Development efforts underway– Initial feedback indicates a 24 month development effort
• Develop to Software requirements• Develop to Standards• Develop to Policies
– Cons• Cost • Schedule• Unknown Risks
SSP Electronic Classroom Control Software Change
(contd)
Questions?
Backup Slides
15
Modernized AIM
Modernized AIM cantie the entire
process together
Modernized AIM cantie the entire
process together
Learning Content
DvlpAnd
Maint(complete ILT / storyboards for learner-directed
content)
[LO Module]
LearningContent Planning
and Design(learning objectives,
content outline, content mgmt data)
[CPM]
Baseline Performance
Reqts
Performance Reqts
(Navy Job Duty Task Analysis /
Competency data)
LearningContent
Storage andDelivery
(learning object aggregations
managed via ties to learning objectives)
Performance Reqts
Updates
Content Outline Draft w Versioned
Learning Objectives
and Metadata
Versioned Learning Objective Updates
Baseline ILT Learning Content
Versioned ILT Learning
Content Updates
Change Impact
Reporting(based on
performance reqts updates;
specifies learning
objectives that may need changing)
Change Impact Reporting
(based on learning objective updates; specifies learning objects that may need changing)
List of learning objects
linked to impacted learning
objectives
Learner-directed Content
Development and Maintenance
[Venus]
List of learning objects
linked to impacted
tech data
Baseline and Updated Learner-directed Learning Content
AIM focus areas
Other govt repositories
COTS/GOTS CBT toolsets
Technical Data Repository
Links to Authoritative Tech Data / Updates
MT Continuum Process
16
LO ModuleOutputs:- complete ILT lessons/sections- storyboards for learner-directed content incl. metadata, links to IETMs, SME inputs on narrative, interactions, & graphicsInputs:- updated storyboard content from Venus.net
CPM
- baseline JTA data- learning objectives- content outline
- content mgmt data)
Content Outline Draft w Versioned Learning Objectives and Metadata
Versioned Learning Objective Updates
Change Impact
Reporting(based on
performance reqts updates;
specifies learning
objectives that may need changing)
Change Impact Reporting
(based on learning objective and tech
data updates; specifies learning objects that may need changing)
List of learning objects linked to impacted
learning objectives
Venus.net
LDC Dvlp/Maint
- amplify and finalize storyboard data from LO Module- dvlp initial LDC lessons/sections- coord review comments- finalize LDC content- export data back to LO Module
List of learning objects
linked to impacted tech data
Baseline and
updated run-time learner-directed content
Technical Data Repository
Links to Authoritative Tech Data / Updates
Baseline Learning Content
Versioned Learning Content Updates
CM’d source files for LDC
Lessons/Sections
?????
metadata,links to IETMs, SME inputs on
narrative, interactions, &
graphics
Updated metadata and graphics files