MSUComposites2009
-
Upload
elzainie-shehab -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of MSUComposites2009
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
1/40
Composite Materials for Aircraft Structuresomposite Materials for Aircraft Structures
Dr. Douglas S. Cairns,Lysle A. Wood Distinguished Professor
Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringMontana State Universit
ME 463 Composites,
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
2/40
Lysle Wood Professor
Goals of the Professorship
technology nationally and in MontanaProvide support for aerospace related faculty
eve opment
Enhance student learning opportunities for aerospace
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-2
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
3/40
Cairns Background
Began composites career in 1978 as a Staff Engineer at the University of Wyoming Characterization of compression fatigue mechanisms of F18 vertical stabilizer
(AS1/3501-6) for Navy , , -
Navy and Army Senior Engineer, Hercules Aerospace, Magna UT (designed and analyzed space and
aircraft structures manufactured from composite materials) Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIT, thesis on damage resistance and
damage tolerance due to impact damage in carbon/epoxy and kevlar/epoxystructures, research sponsored by FAA
Manager of Composites Technology, Hercules Materials Company
US largest manufacturer of structural carbon fibers ma er a s or m ary an commerc a aerospace pr mary s ruc ura app ca ons
Radius Engineering Board of Directors since 1988 Joined Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Montana State University in 1995,
began working on wind turbine blade structures,
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
4/40
Introduction
Com osite materials are used more and more for
primary structures in commercial, industrial, aerospace,marine, and recreational structures
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-4
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
5/40
Composites:
Composites materials consist of a fibrous reinforcements
bonded together with a matrix material
Occur naturally in your bones, in wood, horns etc. Allow the stiffness and strength of the material to change
with direction of loading
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-5
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
6/40
The Hierarchy for Advanced Structural Materials
Begin as laboratory curiosity
Aerospace) Applications to stuff rich people buy
Applications to things you and I can afford
ey ssump on: aw ma er a s are u ma e y
inexpensive and materials synthesis is ultimately
inexpensive
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-6
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
7/40
Case History- Aluminum
At one time, more rare than gold and silver; Kingsand Queens wanted aluminum lates
Very Expensive Applications Art Deco furnishings in the 1920s and 1930s
ary a rcra ur ng
Stuff that rich people buy (Post WW II through 1960s)
General Aviation
Boats
Bicycles
y Aluminum BBQ grills at K-Mart
Aluminum shower curtain rods at hardware store
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-7
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
8/40
Composites:
Carbon Fibers
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-8
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
9/40
Radius Engineering- Salt Lake City, Utah
Radius developedthe Trek carbonfiber bicycle used byRadius developed Swix carbon fiber
Lance Armstrongski poles; have been used by Goldmedal Olympic skiers since 1990s
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-9
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
10/40
Discussion Objective
Provide a brief introduction to composite materialsand structures in Air lane Structures
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-10
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
11/40
Composites are Damage Tolerant
F18 Midair Collision (Circa 2002, no injuries)
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-11
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
12/40
Composites are Damage Tolerant (cont.)
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-12
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
13/40
Composites are Damage Tolerant (cont.)
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-13
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
14/40
Composite Vertical Stabilizer and Rudder Damage
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-14
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
15/40
Composition of Composites
Fiber/FilamentReinforcement CompositeMatrix
Good shear properties High strength High strength
Low density
Good shear properties
Low density
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-15
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
16/40
Carbon is the Emperor
Typical large
tow properties
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-16
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
17/40
The Emperors New ClothesTwo Basic Facts Hamper Application of Carbon Fibers to Primary Structure
Carbon Fiber is expensive; about 8X-10X E-glass
Much more sensitive to fiber mis-ali nment frommanufacturing process
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-17
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
18/40
Not Just An Academic Exercise
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-18Consequence of Misalignment in Large, Composite Structure
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
19/40
To help protectyour privacy,PowerPointprevented thisexternalpicturefrombeing automatically downloaded.To download and display thispicture,click Optionsin theMessageBar,and then click Enableexternalcontent.
The Emperors New ClothesTwo Basic Facts Hamper Application of Carbon Fibers to Primary Structure
updated 3:56 p.m. MT, Fri., Aug 14, 2009Boeing Co. has discovered another problem with its long-delayed 787 jetliner,
prompting the aircraft maker to halt production of fuselage sections at a factory in Italy.
The Chicago-based company found microscopic wrinkles in the skin of the 787s
June 23, spokeswoman Lori Gunter said Friday. Boeing has started patching the areas.
The plane, built for fuel efficiency from lightweight carbon composite parts, is a priorityor oe ng as s rugg es w w n ng or ers am e g o a recess on.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32415601/ns/business-aviation/
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-19
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
20/40
Difficult to Control Manufacturing Defects inProduction
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-20
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
21/40
Shorthand Laminate Orientation Code
Tapes or Undirectional Tapes
[45/0/-45/902/-45/0/45
Each lamina is labeled by its ply orientation.
Laminae are listed in sequence with the first number representing thelamina to which the arrow is ointin . Individual adjacent laminae are separated by a slash if their angles
differ. Adjacent laminae of the same angle are depicted by a numerical
subscript indicating the total number of laminae which are laid up in
[45/0/-45/90] s
sequence a a ang e.
Each complete laminate is enclosed by brackets. When the laminate is symmetrical and has an even number on each
side of the plane of symmetry (known as the midplane) the code maybe shortened by listing only the angles from the arrow side to the
Tapes or undirectional tapes
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-21
midplane. A subscript S is used to indicate that the code for only onehalf of the laminate is shown.
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
22/40
Shorthand Laminate Orientation Code
Fabrics and Tapes and Fabrics
[(45)/(0)/(45)]
Midplane
When plies of fabric are used in a laminate. Theangle of the fabric warp is used as the ply directionan le. The fabric an le is enclosed in arentheses
[(45)/0(-45)/90]
Fabrics
to identify the ply as a fabric ply. When the laminate is composed of both fabric and
tape plies (a hybrid laminate). The parenthesesaround the fabric lies will distin uish the fabric
Midplane
plies from the tape plies. When the laminate is symmetrical and has an odd
number of plies, the center ply is overlined toindicate that it is the mid lane.
Tapes & Fabrics
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-22
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
23/40
Fatigue Performance of Composites ExceedsThat of Metals
(Reference only)1.00
Maximum
25/50/25/ Gr/Ep0.75
cyclicstress/ultimate
stress
0.50
Room0.25
7075-T6 aluminum
,
dry R = -1.0 K1 = 3.0
0102 103 104 105 106 107
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-23
Cycles to failure
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
24/40
Reduced Corrosion Problems WithAdvanced Composites
Advanced composites do not corrode like metalsthe combination of corrosion and fati ue crackinis a significant problem for aluminum commercialfuselage structure.
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-24
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
25/40
Corrosion Case History Aloha Airlines
Low time airframe (but many Ground-Air-Ground cycles, 89,090
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-25
Operated in moist, warm environment (chemical processes exponential
with temperature)
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
26/40
767 Exterior Composite Parts
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-26
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
27/40
Honeycomb Usage
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-27
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
28/40
SummaryAdvantages and Disadvantagesof Composite Materials
Advantages Disadvantages
Weight reduction(approximately 20-50%)
Some higher recurring costs
Higher nonrecurring costs
Corrosion resistance
Fatigue resistance
Higher material costs
Nonvisible impact damage Tailorable mechanical
properties Repairs are different than
those to metal structure
a es roug o se
Lower assembly costsfewer fasteners etc.
Isolation needed to preventadjacent aluminum partgalvanic corrosion
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-28
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
29/40
Material and Process Specifications
Materialspecifications
Processspecifications
Supplier qualification Fiber requirements
Storage and handling Cure cycle
repreg requ rements
Fiber volume
Resin chemistry
ayup an agg ngprocedures
In-process quality control
Forms (tape, fabric)
Cure cycle
Quality controls
Acceptable anomalies
Splicing
Manufacturing characteristics Incoming and receiving tests
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-29
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
30/40
Building Block Approach
ElementsJoints
Coupons
Environment
RT/Ambient
Small Panels
FullAirplaneStructure
Subcomponents
(Thousands)
(Hundreds)(Dozens)
Large Panels
Components
Coupons and Elements
Mechanical properties
Interlaminar properties
Large Panels and Test Boxes
Validate design concepts tress concentrat ons Durability Bolted Joints Impact damage characterization
Provide substantiating data for
material design values Demonstrate compliance with criteria
Materials
The effects of temperature and moisture
Analysis
Thermal and moisture strains calculated
nv ronmenta actors
models to predict strain values
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-30
are accounte or n es gn va ues anstrength properties.
critical condition.
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
31/40
FAA/JAA Requirements forMaterial Allowables
FAR 25.613 Material Stren th Pro erties
Statistical basis
Environmental effects accounted for
MIL-H-17B
FAR 25.615 Desi n Pro erties
A basis for single load path
B basis for redundant structure
FAA AC 20-107A
JAR 25.613 25.615 and 25.603 similar to
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-31
FAA regulations
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
32/40
FAA/JAA Regulations That GovernStructural Materials
FAR 25.603 Materials
Suitability and durability established by tests Conform to specifications that ensure strength
Takes into account environmental conditions
FAR 25.605, Fabrication Methods
sound structure (repeatability)
New methods must be substantiated by tests
FAR 25.609, Protection of Structure Protected against deterioration or loss of strength
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-32
. , . , .regulations
FAA/JAA Ad i i Th G
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
33/40
FAA/JAA Advisories That GovernComposite Materials
FAA AC 20-107A Com osite Aircraft Structure
Presents an acceptablebut not the onlymeans forcertifying advanced composite structure
FAA AC 21-26, Quality Control for the
Manufacture of Composite Structure
Presents an acceptablebut not the onlymeans for
complying with the quality control requirement ofFAR 21
JAA ACJ 25.603, Composite Aircraft Structure
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-33
Similar to FAA AC 20-107A
St th R d ti f
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
34/40
Strength Reduction ofAdvanced Composite Materials
Pristine Materials
Processing anomalies
Surface irregularities
Splicing
Reduction
of theallowable
Waviness
Inclusions
Voids
Stress
Visible damage
Nonvisible damage
Repair (holes, etc.)Allowable
es gn
Environment
Allowable strain
region
Strain
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-34
777 C it P i St t
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
35/40
777 Composite Primary StructureCertification
Sequence Load Description Sequence Load Description
1 Limit roof Load 4 Strain surve
a. Up bendingb. Up bending/unsymmetricc. Down bendingd. Down bendin /
56
7
Fatigue spectrumStrain surveyUltimate load strain survey
a. Stall buffet
2
Unsymmetrice. Stall buffet (unsymmetric)
Strain survey 8
b. Up bendingc. Down bending
Destruction test -
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-35
Fatigue spectrum3 down bending
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
36/40
787 Airplane
Approximately 50% of the airframe is made from composites; avery bold move in the commercial aircraft industry
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-36
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
37/40
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-37
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
38/40
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-38
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
39/40
Boeing 787 Dreamliner Logistics
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-39
-
8/7/2019 MSUComposites2009
40/40