MSmcDESPOT

35
MSmcDESPOT A look at the road behind and ahead October 30, 2009

description

MSmcDESPOT. A look at the road behind and ahead October 30, 2009. The Technique. mcDESPOT (multi-component driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1 /T2) is a quantitative MR technique that characterizes many of the key parameters relevant to MRI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of MSmcDESPOT

Page 1: MSmcDESPOT

MSmcDESPOT

A look at the road behind and aheadOctober 30, 2009

Page 2: MSmcDESPOT

The Technique• mcDESPOT (multi-component driven equilibrium single pulse

observation of T1/T2) is a quantitative MR technique that characterizes many of the key parameters relevant to MRI

• A series of spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) and phase-cycled steady-state free precession (SSFP) scans are collected at different sets of flip angles

• The signal from a single voxel across all these scans is modeled as the combination of two different pools of water, a fast and slow pool in exchange with each other

• A fitting algorithm (stochastic region of contraction) computes the optimal set of parameters that characterizes the observed signal at each voxel in the brain

Page 3: MSmcDESPOT

The Technique• The final result is a set of 10 maps defining MR parameters throughout the

entire brain:– Fast pool T1, T2, and residence time– Slow pool T1 and T2– Single pool T1, T2, and M0 – this is when we do not model each voxel as the sum of

two pools– B0 off-resonance– Fast volume fraction – this is how much each pool contributes to a voxel’s signal or

alternatively, what fraction of a voxel is occupied by each pool• We attribute the fast pool to water trapped between the lipid bilayers of the

myelin sheath, while the slower-relaxing species is believed to correspond to the less restricted intra- and extracellular pools– This needs further histological verification but we will continue under this premise– Thus we rename the fast volume fraction to the “myelin water fraction” (MWF), our

key parameter of interest

Page 4: MSmcDESPOT

The Study• Given this technique which we believe can characterize myelination in

the brain, we move our sights to examine a disease that is characterized by demyelination: multiple sclerosis

• 23 normals + 2 pending• 25 MS patients, 5 in each of 5 classes (low-risk CIS, high-risk CIS, RR, SP,

PP)• Each scanned at 1.5T to avoid B1 inhomogeneity and assumed flip

angle inaccuracy:– mcDESPOT protocol at 2mm3 isotropic– 32-direction DTI sequence at 2.5mm3

– T2/PD FSE at 0.43mm2 in-plane and 6mm slice resolution– FLAIR at 0.86 mm2 in-plane and 3mm slice resolution– MPRAGE pre and post Gd constrast for patients at 1mm3

Page 5: MSmcDESPOT

Preprocessing for mcDESPOT

• Prior to running the fitting algorithm, we must run the SPGR and SSFP images through a preprocessing pipeline

• All the following steps are achieved using the FMRIB Software Library (FSL)

• Throughout this presentation, we will focusing our attention on a single SPMS patient, affectionately known as P025

Page 6: MSmcDESPOT

Preprocessing mcDESPOT – Step 1

1. Linear coregistration with trilinear interpolation (FSL FLIRT) – so that each voxel across all the images is the same piece of physical tissue

Page 7: MSmcDESPOT

Preprocessing mcDESPOT – Step 2

2. Brain extraction from skull (FSL BET) – to reduce computation time

Page 8: MSmcDESPOT

Preprocessing DTI – Step 1

• Similarly, the diffusion weighted images must also be coregistered for eddy current correction and brain extracted

Page 9: MSmcDESPOT

Preprocessing DTI – Step 2

Page 10: MSmcDESPOT

Processing

• Now that the data is all prepared, it is run through the parameter fitting program

• The mcDESPOT volumes are processed with our own code

• The diffusion volumes are fitted with FSL’s dtifit

Page 11: MSmcDESPOT

mcDESPOT Maps

Page 12: MSmcDESPOT

mcDESPOT Maps - MWF

Page 13: MSmcDESPOT

DTI Maps

Fraction Anisotropy Mean Diffusivity

Page 14: MSmcDESPOT

Postprocessing

• Postprocessing involves bringing these various maps and scans into a standard space so that they can be compared with each other on a voxel per voxel basis

• We use the 2mm2 MNI152 T1 standard space template and the 1mm2 FMRIB58 FA map, an average of FA maps from 58 subjects, each nonlinearly registered to the MNI brain

Page 15: MSmcDESPOT

Postprocessing – mcDESPOT

• The mcDESPOT coregistration target for each subject is nonlinearly registered to the MNI brain and this warp field is in turn applied to the 10 maps

• The warp field is found with FSL’s FNIRT using an 8mm3 warp resolution

Page 16: MSmcDESPOT

Standard Space Reg. – SPGR Target

• MNI

MNI152 2mm mcDESPOT SPGR Registration Target

Page 17: MSmcDESPOT

Postprocessing – DTI

• The DTI FA map for each subject is nonlinearly registered to the FMRIB58 map

• Alternatively, we could register it to the mcDESPOT target and use the already computed warp field

Page 18: MSmcDESPOT

Standard Space Reg. – FMRIB58 FA

Page 19: MSmcDESPOT

Standard Space Reg. – DTI FA

Page 20: MSmcDESPOT

Postprocessing – Clinical

• Each clinical scan for each patient is linearly registered to the mcDESPOT target

• Then the target->MNI warp is applied

Page 21: MSmcDESPOT

Analysis

• Whole brain MWF, z-score based thresholding• Would like to move onto tissue-specific MWF

study, particularly in these types: WM, GM, NAWM (normal-appearing white matter), NAGM, and lesions only

• This brings us to the tricky issue of segmentation

Page 22: MSmcDESPOT

Current Issues – Segmentation

• Lesion segmentation is proving to be a very difficult task

• Ultimately we’d like to use the lesion mask to subtract from our other tissue classifications to produce “normal-appearing” tissues

• Here’s some pictures of our results so far using FSL’s FAST with a variety of channels (SPGR, FLAIR, T2, PD)

Page 23: MSmcDESPOT

Clinical-MPRAGE

Page 24: MSmcDESPOT

WM Segmentation – SPGR 3 class

Page 25: MSmcDESPOT

WM Segmentation – SPGR 4 class

Page 26: MSmcDESPOT

WM Seg. – SPGR-FLAIR 4 class

Page 27: MSmcDESPOT

GM Segmentation – SPGR 3 class

Page 28: MSmcDESPOT

GM Segmentation – SPGR 4 class

Page 29: MSmcDESPOT

Lesion Segmentation – SPGR 3 class

Page 30: MSmcDESPOT

Lesion Seg. – SPGR-FLAIR 3 Class

Page 31: MSmcDESPOT

CSF Segmentation – SPGR 3 Class

Page 32: MSmcDESPOT

CSF Seg. – SPGR-T2-PD 3 class

Page 33: MSmcDESPOT

Segmentation Questions

• What is the best way to obtain a lesion mask?• Should we do operations on the masks we

have, like subtracting the out-of-brain CSF from the SPGR-FLAIR 3 class CSF mask?

• Are there other existing tools out there for either automatic or semi-manual lesion segmentation?

Page 34: MSmcDESPOT

Statistical Study

• We intend to use the Wilcoxon rank sum test as our workhorse for statistical comparison

• Many of our variables are not intrinsically Gaussian so the t-test and ANOVA do not seem applicable

Page 35: MSmcDESPOT

Open Questions

• DTI registration to standard space: FMRIB58 or via SPGR mcDESPOT target?

• Patient matching: gender or age first?• How to deal with lesions across patients:

Vrenken approach is to replace missing data with the mean of the group