MS-DRG 180-181-182 slides
-
Upload
intersect-healthcare -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
2.337 -
download
0
description
Transcript of MS-DRG 180-181-182 slides
1
Respiratory Respiratory NeoplasmNeoplasm
Charmira Orr BS,LPN,CCS,CPC,CCDSDirector of Coding and Appeals
Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
2
Participants will review and understand
Learning Objectives
Participants will review and understand the RAC’s focus
Participants will review and understand how to incorporate guidelines to aid in p gauditing practices
22010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
3
The RAC’s Focus
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 3
4
DiagnosticDiagnostic
InformationInformation
ProceduresProceduresDischargeDischarge
DiagnosisDiagnosis
DischargeDischarge
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 4
5
MS‐DRG 180,181,182
Issue Details Name Respiratory 175, 176, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 192, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206 (Medical Necessity Excluded) Number B001232010 Description MS-DRG validation requires that diagnostic and procedural information and the discharge status of the beneficiary, as coded on the hospital claim, matches both the attending physician description and the information contained in the medical record. Reviewers will validate MS-DRGs 175, 176, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 192, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205 and 206 for diagnoses and procedures affecting the MS-DRG assignment. Claim Type Inpatient Issue Type Complex Overpayment / Underpayment Overpayment and Underpayment Dates of Service 10/1/2007 - Open States IL, IN, KY, MI, MN, OH WI Policy Related Links ICD 9 CM Coding Manual (for dates of service on claim)OH, WI Policy Related Links ICD-9-CM Coding Manual (for dates of service on claim)
ICD-9-CM Addendums and coding clinicsPIM Ch 6.5.3, Section A – C - DRG Validation Review
Present on Admission Indicator Systems ImplementationOIG - Monitoring the Accuracy of Hospital Coding (OEI-01-98-00420; 1/99)
Date Approved 6/10/2010
CGI Federal , 2010 ©
52010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
6
Things We Know
i h CC/ CC G OS 3 0 0 81 9Without CC/MCC
With CC
With MCC
• GMLOS 3.0, RW 0.8159
• GMLOS 4.3, RW 1.2062
• GMLOS 5.9, RW 1.7263
Principle Diagnosis • Malignant, Secondary, Benign, In situ, Lipoma’s
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 6
7
Principle Diagnosis
• The condition found after study to have occasioned the current admission or encounter
• The majority of treatment can often be used as a guide to selecting the principal diagnosisselecting the principal diagnosis
• Primary and Secondary Sites
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 7
8
PRIMARY VS. SECONDARY SEQUENCING GUIDELINESSEQUENCING GUIDELINES
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 8
9
PRIMARY
When treatment is directed toward the primary site, the malignancy of that site is designated as the principal diagnosis unless the encounter or hospital admission is solely for the purpose of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapypy, py, py
– Then the primary malignancy is a secondary diagnosis, Encounter ( V-Codes ) First
– If two primary sites are present, each is coded p y p ,as a primary neoplasm
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 9
10
Follow the Treatment
If there are 2 primary sites, however, treatment is directed primarily toward one site, that site should be designated as the principal diagnosis
If treatment is directed equally toward both sites, either may be designated as the principal diagnosis
11
Secondary SitesIf treatment is directed only at the secondary site, the secondary site is designated as the principal diagnosis– An additional code is assigned for the primary malignancymalignancy
– A V ‐ code is assigned as the additional code if the primary site has resolved
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 11
12
Presumed Secondary Neoplasm
di iMediastinumMeningesPeritoneumPleuraRetroperitoneumSpinal CordSites Classifiable to 195BoneBrainDiaphragmDiaphragmHeartLiverLymph nodes
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 12
13
Secondary DiagnosisDiagnoses that coexist at the time of admission or
develop subsequently or affect patient care for the current develop subsequently or affect patient care for the current hospital episode.
Should only be documented when?Clinically Evaluated
Diagnostically Tested
Increase nursing care or monitoring
13
Therapeutically TreatedIncreased LOS
14
Common CC/MCC Conditions
h / i i i• Asthma w/acute exacerbation or status asthmaticus
• Bronchitis w/ acute exacerbation
• CKD
• Aspiration pneumonia• Empyema• Pneumonia• Pulmonary embolism• Lung Abscess
• CKD• Respiratory insufficiency• Pulmonary edema• Pneumothorax• Tracheostomy
li ti
• Spontaneous tension pneumothorax
• Mediastinitis• Bacterial pleural effusion• Acute Respiratory Failure
complicationsp y
15
Common Diagnostic Procedures
• CXR• CT scans• PET scans• Sputum Cytology• Sputum Cytology• Biopsies• Bronchoscopy• Mediastinoscopypy• Bone scans
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 15
16
Common Treatmentsdi h h Ch h• Radiotherapy, Immunotherapy, or Chemotherapy
• When a patient encounter is solely for the administration of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy, assign the appropriate code as the first-listed or principal diagnosis - ( V –Codes)
• If the encounter is to receive one or more of these • If the encounter is to receive one or more of these therapies, each pertinent code should be assigned, in any sequence
• Additional code should be assigned for the malignancy• Procedure codes should also be assigned
92 2x Radiation therapy– 92.2x Radiation therapy– 99.28 Immunotherapy– 99.25 Chemotherapy
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 16
17
Documentation Highlights
• Acute vs. chronic• Diagnostic test –documented diagnosis• Diagnostic reports- document diagnosis in
progress notesI iti t d t t t l• Initiated treatment or plans
• Severity of condition• Etiology of condition
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 17
18
Auditing for Neoplasm
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 18
19
Worksheet
h fLength of stay:
Discharge status:
Home or Self Care ‐01
Discharged/ Transferred to a Short Term General Hospital for Inpatient Care ‐02
Discharged/ Transferred to a SNF with Medicare Certification in Anticipation of killed Care ‐ 03
Discharged/Transferred to an Intermediate Care Facility ‐ 04
Discharged/Transferred to Another Type of Health Care Facility Not elsewhere in the Code List‐ 05
Discharged/ Transferred to Home Care‐ 06
AMA ‐07
Expired‐20
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 19
20
Worksheetd i i O dAdmission Orders:
Malignant condition noted
Was treatment during stay directed at this area: Yes or No
Was patient admitted for treatment only? Yes or No
Were there any complications noted during stay? Yes or No If so, please listlist__________________________________________________________________________
Were any procedures performed on either the primary or secondary malignancy? Drop Down Box Yes or No If so; please list ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Then area to fill in the blank_____________________________________________________________________________
Is there any mention in the medical record that a primary malignancy has beenIs there any mention in the medical record that a primary malignancy has been excised or eradicated? Box Yes or No if so; is there any treatment directed at this area? Yes or No
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 20
21
Worksheeth i li ill b i di d h d iIs the primary malignancy still present, but treatment is directed at the secondary site only during the admission?
Secondary diagnosis: _____________________________________________________________________
Were these diagnoses treated during pt. stay? Yes or No if so; list Fill in the blank treatments____________________________________________________________________
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 21
1
Appealing a Appealing a Respiratory Respiratory Neoplasms Neoplasms
Inpatient DenialInpatient Denial
‘Yomi Faparusi, MD JD PhDDirector, Medical Review and Research,
Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
2
Understand how to create a successful
Learning Objectives
Understand how to create a successful coding or medical necessity appeal for Respiratory Neoplasms denials by:
Understanding the Issue at HandProviding a Road Map for the ReviewerPresenting a Preponderance of Best Evidence
Understand how to tailor appeals to the Administrative Law Judge
22010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
3
Top target MS DRG during RAC demonstration
Understanding the Issue at Hand
Top target MS DRG during RAC demonstration project
Historically have been identified as problematic DRGsNational Validation Study: HHS-OIG recommended review of admissionsSh t h it li ti ith l ti l hi h Short hospitalization with relatively high unnecessary admission rates
PEPPER data (FY 2007)Error rate of 11%DRG changes: 5% ; Admission denials: 6%
32010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
Key Learning: Respiratory Neoplasms expected to maintain status with the permanent RAC program especially with Medical Necessity audits.
4
Usually an “outlier” inpatient case
Understanding the Issue at Hand
Usually an outlier inpatient caseRarely need inpatient admissionsShort hospitalizationAdmitted when patient presents with complications and/or for management of co morbidities
BleedingObstructiveHormonal (ectopic production) etc.
Occupational and Social issuesSmokingCoal miningAsbestos e pos eAsbestos exposure
42010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
Key Learning: Most patients with respiratory neoplasms are treated as outpatient hence look for documentation why index case is inpatient
5
The Appeal AlgorithmNCDNCD
LCD
COMMUNITY STANDARDS OF MEDICAL CARE
2010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc. 5
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
RULE
TREATING OR ATTENDING
PHYSICIAN RULE
6
NCD
NCDs & LCDsNCDEnsure effective on the date of service (may have been retired)
Aprepitant for Chemotherapy-Induced Emesis (110.18)Certain Drugs Distributed by the National Cancer Institute (110.2)Erythropoesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs) in Cancer and Related Neoplastic Conditions (110.21)p ( )
LCDCheck with your FI etc.
62010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
Key Learning: The ALJ is bound by the NCDs however mayconsider the LCDs at his/her discretion
7
Providing a Road Map
J tifi ti f M di l N itJustification of Medical NecessityThe arguments presented below justify the medical necessity of hospital services. Just as importantly, the arguments justify that
the hospital services provided are “generally accepted by the professional community as being safe and effective treatment.”
Signs and Where Skilled Outcome of Source of Symptoms or Complications
Documented Intervention(s) Intervention Recommendation
Drowsiness, Confusion, Seizures
*Hyponatremia
Physician’s admission notes dated 3/10/2010; entered electronically by Dr. Glenn;
Intubated; I.V. hypertonic saline at 125mL/h for 3 hours
Mental status changes reversed and patient no longer had seizures
Dr. Miller (see Nephrology Consult notes dated 3/10/2010; page 32 (of 175) of the Medical Record
72010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
Page 27 (of 175) of the Medical Record
8
ACCP EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES
Preponderance of Evidence
ACCP EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINESAmerican College of Chest Physicians
Health and Science Policy Committee
Diagnosis and management of lung cancer
Reviewed annually for new developments Most current ACCP guidelines for lung cancer were published in the September 2007 supplement edition of CHEST
American College of Chest Physicians. (2007). Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer: ACCP Guidelines.
CHEST: 132 (3suppl.) http://chestjournal.chestpubs.org/content/132/3_suppl
82010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
9
Preponderance of Evidence
• ACCP PUBLICATIONS • HOME • CURRENT ISSUE • ARCHIVE
FEEDBACK• FEEDBACK • SUBSCRIBE • ALERTS • HELP
Table of Contents
September 1 2007; 132 (3 suppl)
92010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
September 1, 2007; 132 (3 suppl)Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer: ACCP Guidelines
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Preponderance of Evidence
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) guidelinesAmerican Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO). (2009). Clinical Practice Guideline, Lung Cancer. http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Practice+%26+Guidelines/p gGuidelines/Clinical+Practice+Guidelines/Lung+Cancer
Other professional associationsAs applicable to the management of complications or co morbidities
102010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
11
Use the guidelines that were available and in effect at the
Parting Thoughts
Use the guidelines that were available and in effect at the time the services were provided, coded, and billed!
Provide clear and accurate reference information, including URLs.
Include all supporting guidelines in full text documents pp g g(the pertinent pages) as attachments to your appeal.
112010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
12
Best Practice for Appeal
Summary
Best Practice for AppealDetermine if documentation in the chart supports an appealSupport the coding decision with:
ICD‐9‐CM Coding Guidelines
ICD‐9‐CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting IC 9 CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting
American Hospital Association's (AHA) Coding Clinic for ICD‐9‐CM
Support the physician’s decision making process with evidence based guidelinesUse CMS’s coverage policies and guidelines
122010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.
13
THE MEDICARE RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTOR (RAC) PROGRAM:
Resources
An Evaluation of the 3-Year Demonstration, June 2008https://www.cms.gov/RAC/Downloads/RACEvaluationReport.pdf
Official ICD-9-CM Guidelines for Coding and ReportingEffective October 1, 2009http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm_addenda_guidelines.htm
American College of Chest Physicians. (2007). Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer: ACCP Guidelines. CHEST: 132 (3suppl.) http://chestjournal.chestpubs.org/content/132/3_suppl
American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO). (2009). Clinical Practice Guideline, Lung Cancer. htt // /ASCO 2/P ti +%26+G id li /G id li /Cli ihttp://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Practice+%26+Guidelines/Guidelines/Clinical+Practice+Guidelines/Lung+Cancer
132010 Intersect Healthcare, Inc.