MRO/ID in Rail A Standard for the Future - GS1 · MRO/ID in Rail A Standard for the Future Dominik...

MRO/ID in Rail

A Standard for the FutureDominik Halbeisen SBB AG, Corporate SCM, October 2016, GS1 Meeting Brussels

Agenda.

SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 2

1. Driving factors for improved asset and material management

2. The marking/identification challenges therein

3. The goal of the MRO/ID in Rail working group

4. Most-FAQs

5. Application example

6. Future outlook

7. Benefits

Manifold External Influences on the Rail Sector…In recent years the environment of the rail sector has changed.

Most importantly due to new legislation and steadily rising cost pressure.


ECM

EU 445/2011

TSI

SMS Infra

EU 1169/2010

SMS Operator

EU 1158/2010

CE

«Blue Guide»

Single European

Market Cost Pressure

Higher Reliability

New Automotive

Technologies

Supply Chain

Globalization

Improved

Service

Legislation Market Pressure

For the supplier to customer interfaces it looks like a relatively easy fix.

Many elements already seem to be there or fairly quick to implement.

…Require Improved Asset and Material ManagementThis requires, among other things, a new level of asset and material management in MRO value

added chains, as this is the basis for further process improvement and stability


Serialization based

on supplier S/N (where necessary)

Marking of part numbers(where missing)

Today Tomorrow

At a Second Glance First Challenges Appear…


Including your part number (= the customer part number) on a material is:

- Feasible for parts manufactured for you only

… because the solution toolbox is not complete

- Costly for parts manufactured

not only for you.

-- Solution 1: Follow an

industry standard (like DIN)

-- And if there is no

industry standard?

-> no solution today

OK

OK

NOT OK

At a Further Glance even more Challenges Appear…


Which one is the S/N?

Reg-Nr.?

Series?

Fabr.Nr.?

Nr.? ID-Nr.?

No description?

How is it constructed?

Is it unique in my

asset mgmt. system?

09A884

101607

006-1-3026 04/07 01

0031

How do I need to type the

data string in?

… because the numbering conventions are not clear

What AIDC-technology can be

requested to eliminate typing errors?

10710

No description?

What about Marking Parts Yourself?By marking parts yourself you could do it your own way without relying on other parties


… so marking yourself is clearly not the ideal solutionMarking parts yourself allows you to:

- Remain independent of your suppliers

- Use your own AIDC-standard

However:

- This is costly and time consuming

- Can be difficult

- Your label normally has a shorter life

expectancy than the part

- There may be no space

- This is a waste, as often

there already are AIDC markings

- Is impossible in a shared refurbishment pool

Getting Your Parts Marked is Clearly a Cross-company Challenge…


… shared by many industry players… and addressed in the MRO/ID in Rail working group

What is the Goal of the MRO/ID in Rail Working Group?


To create a rail-specific numbering standard for assets and materials

with rules and ID-keys for:

• Secondary part numbers (= class IDs)

• Unique serial numbers (= serial IDs),

Based on part numbers and independent of part numbers

• Regulate the use of the following attributes

Manufacturing lot ID

Refurbishment lot ID

Function level of a part

Revision level of a part

Refabrication location

• As well as establish marking rules for primary packaging

… a numbering standard aimed at multilateral interfaces

Most-FAQs


What parts will be affected?

• At part number level: Parts manufactured for n-customers

• At S/N level: Primarily parts with safety, operational, TSI or

high economic relevance

Will I have to replace my part numbers?

• Normally no. The new normed class ID is meant as secondary key

Will I have to replace my serial numbers?

• Only the S/N marked on a part

What is the timeline

• The standard is planned to take effect on the 1st of January 2017.

• Its application is from then on planned to gradually become a

requirement for suppliers to the main actors in the rail sector

ETCS-Balises Fastenings for ETCS-Balises

Application Example: ETCS-Balises


Current serial number

will be replaced by a GIAI(during 2017)

In a first step receive a

GTIN on the packaging

In a second step will be

Directly marked with a GTIN(during 2017)

(8004)76132994000000000001

(01)07612399012347

Future Outlook for the Standard Development


In Q1/2017 phase 2 of the standard will commence

• Goal: define rules for BOM / data-exchange

• Aim: make the next step towards a «RAIL CLOUD»

What is the Benefit for Me?


• For suppliers: Reduced number of deviating and contradictory

customer requirements. The standard protects you.

• For customers: Increased buying power in regards to marking

• As a consequence: Increased certainty for production and

IT-process planning in regards to marking

• Therefore: Reduction of process complexity

• A tool box for so far unresolved asset and material marking cases

• After phase 2: A tool box for the standardized BOM/data exchange

• FINALLY: the «RAIL CLOUD», which will allow for sharing of configuration

data, maintenance data, part histories and a common, shared data basis

… for ALL parties involved in the lifecycle of a part

Real Use Case – An Example

Temporary ETCS Balises for Building Sites


What are ETCS-balises?

They are the modern version of traffic lights and signals telling a train

how fast it can go, whether it is allowed to enter a given part of track etc.

And this is what the names ETCS stands for: European Train Control System

Pilot: Application of GS1 MRO/ID in Rail standard for temporary

ETCS-balises

For temporary and mobile ETCS-balises the GS1 MRO/ID in Rail standard

will be rolled out in 2017.

Theses balises circulate in intervals of roughly 8 weeks and

need to be individually programmed for each building site.

Asset management is crucial!

Process yesterday (without MRO/ID in Rail)


Assets managed as SAP PM Equipment

• Based on SBB S/N or equipment number or part number

Process limits:

• No space for permanent barcodes

• Therefore no use of AIDC-technologies

• Either: How to make sure the correct serial and equipment numbers are

by SBB labelled to the correct object?

• Or: Supplier uses/affixes multiple numbers/tags (cost and data exchange)

• Use of additional labels is a waste of money and time

• How does a user know which number to use (without specific training)?

• Data exchange with supplier difficult (data matching)

Process tomorrow (with GIAI as per MRO/ID in Rail)


Assets managed as SAP PM Equipment

• In the system only: SBB S/N, equipment number or part number

• On the tag: Supplier GIAI, barcoded (no more SBB S/N)

New processes opportunities:

• Permanent barcode (enabler)

• Therefore use of AIDC-technologies possible (faster, less errors)

• S/N does not have to be typed in any longer (faster, less errors)

• No more affixing of SBB S/N by supplier (reduced cost)

• Easy S/N recognition by users across all types of parts (once rolled out)

• Data exchange with supplier easy (no more data matching)

What about part number level?


The MRO/ID in Rail Standard completes the tool box

• Parts marked yellow: Serialized parts. Marked with GIAI

• Parts marked in blue: SBB-specific parts. Marked with SBB part number

• Parts marked in green: Not SBB specific parts. Marked with Siemens GTIN

Back-Up Slides

Equipment-Pages without GIAI


Search and Result Page for Equipment w/o GIAI


Equipment-Pages with GIAI


Search-Page for Equipment with GIAI


MRO/ID in Rail A Standard for the Future - GS1 · MRO/ID in Rail A Standard for the Future Dominik...

Documents

Transcript of MRO/ID in Rail A Standard for the Future - GS1 · MRO/ID in Rail A Standard for the Future Dominik...