Motion to Deny Extension for Time.
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Cody A. Fitch [email protected] 4902 Fifth Street, Santa Ana, CA 714-554-1759 CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS 4 TH DIVISION, 3 RD DISTRICT DIVISION CODY A FITCH, Appellant vs. NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY, Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeals No: G049741 MOTION TO DENY EXTENSION FOR TIME NO PUBLIC EMERGENCY I. FACT PATTERN The Appellant had just filed an emergency extension of time for a issue of him in a war with Mexico. This appeals motion was denied. This case was Priority v Fitch. The Defendants are a muti-trillion dollar non-profit with more than enough resources and workers to properly respond and they do not have any MOTION TO DENY EXTENSION FOR TIME NO PUBLIC EMERGENCY - 1
-
Upload
cody-a-fitch -
Category
Documents
-
view
27 -
download
3
description
Motion to deny extension for time.
Transcript of Motion to Deny Extension for Time.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Cody A. [email protected] Fifth Street, Santa Ana, CA714-554-1759
CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS
4TH DIVISION, 3RD DISTRICT DIVISION
CODY A FITCH,
Appellant
vs.
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY,
Respondent
))))))))))))))
Appeals No: G049741
MOTION TO DENY EXTENSION FOR TIME NO PUBLIC EMERGENCY
I. FACT PATTERN
The Appellant had just filed an emergency extension of time for
a issue of him in a war with Mexico. This appeals motion was denied. This case
was Priority v Fitch. The Defendants are a muti-trillion dollar non-profit with more
than enough resources and workers to properly respond and they do not have any
emergency legal facts. So the extension should be denied and the default granted.
The Respondents say there is some kind of communication barrier I have emailed
them multiple times and they can easily communicate with me. There is no barrier
or reason for them being late except for destroying my heart beats of my time on
this planet and time line without justice.
- 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
II. EXTENSION FOR TIME LEGAL RULES.
(California Rules of Court 8.66 Emergency Extension)
The court of Appeals rules for extension of time it has to be an
emergency. The document provided by the Respondents. There is no reasoning
legal arguments or other reason for them being late so the court must deny any
extension of they can become sued by the Appellant as an institution of justice. Its
unfair that the Appellant that has filed a very good see below extension of time a
real emergency of war, guns being shot at him, dead people, kidnapped people in
his life, constant oppression and he did not get the extension of time. But these
people who the Appellant has fired 15 Federal judges through his family clan the
MacDonalds and fired over 900,000 US federal workers cause of miss use of legal
cause of corruption already should get the justice that the Appellant can’t get in
APPEALS CASE: G049996 PRIORITY BUSINESS INC v CODY A FITCH.
There is no knew legal reasoning and that is not a reason for being late that is
excusable. Sued the courts can be and heavily fired and oppressed by corruption
charges in MacDonald clan courts.
III. CONTEMPT OF COURT LIEING UNTRUTHFULLNESS
(California Penal Code section 118 Code of Civil Procedure, (CCP,) Section
128.7)
- 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Respondent has stated that the “communication with
appellant is unproductive” This is a lie, they have made no communication with
the Appellant at all. The courts should bear witness that the case is about their
communication. Once again, the lie to themselves, the court and the Appellant. It’s
is very easy to go like this: email to Cody, Cody will respond. They have not and
for 10 years have not communicated with me. Thus they fall purview to the legal
action by the courts for lieing to get an extension of time for unproductive
communications. I have not blocked them from communicating to me. CCP 118
says if the litigant lies in court they can be punished by 1-4 years in jail, CCP
section 127.8 says if the litigant lies in a document to get a judgment they can
sanctioned.
III. PRAYER
The appeals court do not allow the illegal no legal excuse for
late filing document and they rule on the case as argued already and the appeals
case. The Court should sanction the Respondent for lying to the court to try and
get a judgment. They know better than lie. They can easily communicate with me
on anything they want. Just cause she is a woman does not mean she can lie. . Liz
is lying and that team has grown way to accustomed to lying to people instead of
communicating properly.
- 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_________________
Cody A Fitch
- 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
I, GERALD ARNOLD FITCH, live in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my business address 4902 FIFTH STREET, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92703
On 07/26/14, I caused the foregoing document described to be served on the interested parties in this action MOTION TO DENY EXTENSION FOR TIME NO PUBLIC EMERGENCY
[ X] by placing [ ] the original [X] a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as stated below: 2601 Main Street #560 Irvine, CA 92614 and 31441 Santa Margarita Parkway #371 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
[X] (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct.
Executed on 07/26/14, at SANTA ANA, California.
_____________________
GERALD ARNOLD FITCH JR
- 5
