Morphological Analysis

31
Morphological Analysis Chapter 3

description

Morphological Analysis. Chapter 3. Morphology. Morpheme = "minimal meaning-bearing unit in a language" Morphology handles the formation of words by using morphemes base form ( stem,lemma ), e.g., believe affixes (suffixes, prefixes, infixes), e.g., un-, -able, - ly - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Morphological Analysis

Page 1: Morphological Analysis

Morphological Analysis

Chapter 3

Page 2: Morphological Analysis

Morphology

• Morpheme = "minimal meaning-bearing unit in a language"

• Morphology handles the formation of words by using morphemes– base form (stem,lemma), e.g., believe– affixes (suffixes, prefixes, infixes), e.g., un-, -able, -ly

• Morphological parsing = the task of recognizing the morphemes inside a word– e.g., hands, foxes, children

• Important for many tasks– machine translation, information retrieval, etc.– Parsing, text simplification, etc

2

Page 3: Morphological Analysis

Morphemes and Words

• Combine morphemes to create words Inflection

combination of a word stem with a grammatical morpheme same word class, e.g. clean (verb), clean-ing (verb)

Derivation combination of a word stem with a grammatical morpheme Yields different word class, e.g delight (verb), delight-ful

(adj) Compounding

combination of multiple word stems Cliticization

combination of a word stem with a clitic different words from different syntactic categories, e.g. I’ve

= I + have

3

Page 4: Morphological Analysis

Inflectional Morphology

• Inflectional Morphology• word stem + grammatical morpheme cat + s• only for nouns, verbs, and some adjectives

• Nouns plural: regular: +s, +es irregular: mouse - mice; ox - oxen many spelling rules: e.g. -y -> -ies like: butterfly -

butterflies possessive: +'s, +'

• Verbs main verbs (sleep, eat, walk) modal verbs (can, will, should) primary verbs (be, have, do)

4

Page 5: Morphological Analysis

Inflectional Morphology (verbs)

• Verb Inflections for:• main verbs (sleep, eat, walk); primary verbs (be, have, do)

• Morpholog. Form Regularly Inflected Form• stem walk merge try

map• -s form walks merges tries maps• -ing participle walking merging trying

mapping• past; -ed participle walked merged tried

mapped

• Morph. Form Irregularly Inflected Form• stem eat catch cut • -s form eats catches cuts • -ing participle eating catching cutting • -ed past ate caught cut• -ed participle eaten caught cut

5

Page 6: Morphological Analysis

• Noun Inflections for:• regular nouns (cat, hand); irregular nouns(child, ox)

• Morpholog. Form Regularly Inflected Form• stem cat hand• plural form cats hands

• Morph. Form Irregularly Inflected Form• stem child ox • plural form children oxen

Inflectional Morphology (nouns)

6

Page 7: Morphological Analysis

Inflectional and Derivational Morphology (adjectives)

• Adjective Inflections and Derivations:

• prefix un- unhappy adjective, negation• suffix -ly happily adverb, manner• suffix -ier, -iest happier, happiest comparatives• suffix -ness happiness noun

• plus combinations, like unhappiest, unhappiness.

• Distinguish different adjective classes, which can or cannot take certain inflectional or derivational forms, e.g. no negation for big.

7

Page 8: Morphological Analysis

Derivational Morphology (nouns)

8

Page 9: Morphological Analysis

Derivational Morphology (adjectives)

9

Page 10: Morphological Analysis

Verb Clitics

10

Page 11: Morphological Analysis

11

Morpholgy and FSAs

• We’d like to use the machinery provided by FSAs to capture these facts about morphology Recognition:

Accept strings that are in the language Reject strings that are not

In a way that doesn’t require us to in effect list all the words in the language

Page 12: Morphological Analysis

12

Computational Lexicons

• Depending on the purpose, computational lexicons have various types of information Between FrameNet and WordNet, we

saw POS, word sense, subcategorization, semantic roles, and lexical semantic relations

For our purposes now, we care about stems, irregular forms, and information about affixes

Page 13: Morphological Analysis

13

Starting Simply

• Let’s start simply: Regular singular nouns listed explicitly

in lexicon Regular plural nouns have an -s on the

end Irregulars listed explicitly too

Page 14: Morphological Analysis

14

Simple Rules

Page 15: Morphological Analysis

15

Now Plug in the Words

Recognition of valid wordsBut “foxs” isn’t right; we’ll see how to fix that

Page 16: Morphological Analysis

16

Parsing/Generation vs. Recognition

• We can now run strings through these machines to recognize strings in the language

• But recognition is usually not quite what we need Often if we find some string in the language we

might like to assign a structure to it (parsing) Or we might have some structure and we want to

produce a surface form for it (production/generation)

• Example From “cats” to “cat +N +PL”

Page 17: Morphological Analysis

17

Finite State Transducers

• Add another tape• Add extra symbols to the transitions• On one tape we read “cats”, on the

other we write “cat +N +PL”

Page 18: Morphological Analysis

18

FSTs

Page 19: Morphological Analysis

19

Applications

• The kind of parsing we’re talking about is normally called morphological analysis

• It can either be • An important stand-alone component of

many applications (spelling correction, information retrieval)

• Or simply a link in a chain of further linguistic analysis

Page 20: Morphological Analysis

20

Transitions

• c:c means read a c on one tape and write a c on the other• +N:ε means read a +N symbol on one tape and write

nothing on the other• +PL:s means read +PL and write an s

c:c a:a t:t +N: ε +PL:s

Page 21: Morphological Analysis

21

Ambiguity

• Recall that in non-deterministic recognition multiple paths through a machine may lead to an accept state.• Didn’t matter which path was actually

traversed• In FSTs the path to an accept state

does matter since different paths represent different parses and different outputs will result

Page 22: Morphological Analysis

22

Ambiguity

• What’s the right parse (segmentation) for• Unionizable• Union-ize-able• Un-ion-ize-able

• Each represents a valid path through the morphology machine.

Page 23: Morphological Analysis

23

Ambiguity

• There are a number of ways to deal with this problem• Simply take the first output found• Find all the possible outputs (all paths)

and return them all (without choosing)• Bias the search so that only one or a few

likely paths are explored

Page 24: Morphological Analysis

24

The Gory Details

• Of course, its not as easy as • “cat +N +PL” <-> “cats”

• As we saw earlier there are geese, mice and oxen

• But there are also a whole host of spelling/pronunciation changes that go along with inflectional changes• Fox and Foxes vs. Cat and Cats

Page 25: Morphological Analysis

25

Multi-Tape Machines

• To deal with these complications, we will add more tapes and use the output of one tape machine as the input to the next

• So to handle irregular spelling changes we’ll add intermediate tapes with intermediate symbols

Page 26: Morphological Analysis

26

Multi-Level Tape Machines

• We use one machine to transduce between the lexical and the intermediate level, and another to handle the spelling changes to the surface tape

#

Page 27: Morphological Analysis

27

Intermediate to Surface

• The add an “e” rule as in fox^s# --> foxes#

Page 28: Morphological Analysis

28

Lexical to Intermediate Level

Page 29: Morphological Analysis

29

Foxes

#

This arrow should point straight down

Page 30: Morphological Analysis

30

Notes

• The transducers may be run in the other direction too (examples in lecture)

• The transducers are cascaded: The output of one layer serves as the input to the next

Page 31: Morphological Analysis

31

Overall Scheme

#

We aren’t coveringthe overall schemein any more detail than this