Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

39
1 Media Effects, Moral Media Effects, Moral Panics and Audiences Panics and Audiences MAC201 Rob Jewitt

description

MAC201 session slides on the trouble with 'media effects' work. Updated Nov 2011

Transcript of Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

Page 1: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

1

Media Effects, Moral Media Effects, Moral Panics and AudiencesPanics and AudiencesMedia Effects, Moral Media Effects, Moral

Panics and AudiencesPanics and Audiences

MAC201 Rob JewittMAC201

Rob Jewitt

Page 2: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

2

Essential reading:Essential reading: Martin Barker & Julian Petley, 2001, Ill

Effects: the Media/Violence Debate – 2nd Edition, London: Routledge (esp Introduction)

David Gauntlett, 1998, ‘Ten things wrong with the “effects” model’ http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm

Karen Ross & Virginia Nightengale, 2003, Media and Audiences: New perspectives, Berkshire: Open University Press (esp chapter 4)

Martin Barker & Julian Petley, 2001, Ill Effects: the Media/Violence Debate – 2nd Edition, London: Routledge (esp Introduction)

David Gauntlett, 1998, ‘Ten things wrong with the “effects” model’ http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm

Karen Ross & Virginia Nightengale, 2003, Media and Audiences: New perspectives, Berkshire: Open University Press (esp chapter 4)

Page 3: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

3

Models and ResearchModels and Research

The Hypodermic Syringe ModelThe Two-step Flow HypothesisExperimentsClaims

The Hypodermic Syringe ModelThe Two-step Flow HypothesisExperimentsClaims

Page 4: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

4

Violence and the Media Debates

Violence and the Media Debates

DesensitisationYou are more likely to commit acts of

violence as you have overcome your inhibitions

Violence is normalised – we tolerate it

Common sense approaches

Newson Report (1994) James Bulger murder

DesensitisationYou are more likely to commit acts of

violence as you have overcome your inhibitions

Violence is normalised – we tolerate it

Common sense approaches

Newson Report (1994) James Bulger murder

Page 5: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

5

The Newson Report claims:

The Newson Report claims:

Murder of James Bulger was so special as to deserve special explanation.

Such an explanation has to be some singular change. Easy availability of sadistic films

These films convey a distinctive message and one that correlates with the behaviour of the killers.

There is a new kind of film that makes the viewer identify with the perpetrator not the victim.

What is experienced vicariously will have some effect on some people – otherwise advertisers would be wasting their time and money.

The situation is worsening – producers are exploiting new technologies in increasingly sophisticated ways. 

Large amounts of research have established there is a link between “heavy viewing” of “media violence” and “aggressive behaviour”

Murder of James Bulger was so special as to deserve special explanation.

Such an explanation has to be some singular change. Easy availability of sadistic films

These films convey a distinctive message and one that correlates with the behaviour of the killers.

There is a new kind of film that makes the viewer identify with the perpetrator not the victim.

What is experienced vicariously will have some effect on some people – otherwise advertisers would be wasting their time and money.

The situation is worsening – producers are exploiting new technologies in increasingly sophisticated ways. 

Large amounts of research have established there is a link between “heavy viewing” of “media violence” and “aggressive behaviour”

Page 6: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

Rebuke?Rebuke?

The Byron Review 2008 Literature Review by Prof.

David Buckingham Expert on children and media-

use

The Byron Review 2008 Literature Review by Prof.

David Buckingham Expert on children and media-

use

6

Page 7: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

Rebuke?Rebuke?

“Broadly speaking, the evidence about effects is weak and inconclusive – and this applies both to positive and negative effects. Of course, this does not in itself mean that such effects do not exist. However, it is fair to conclude that directly harmful effects are significantly less powerful and less frequent than they are often assumed to be, at least by some of the most vocal participants in the public debate.”

“Broadly speaking, the evidence about effects is weak and inconclusive – and this applies both to positive and negative effects. Of course, this does not in itself mean that such effects do not exist. However, it is fair to conclude that directly harmful effects are significantly less powerful and less frequent than they are often assumed to be, at least by some of the most vocal participants in the public debate.”

7

Page 8: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

Nevertheless…Nevertheless…

Neuroscientists are studying the brain looking for effects

Neuroscientists are studying the brain looking for effects

8

Page 9: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

Nevertheless…Nevertheless…

However, these studies are lacking evidence

However, these studies are lacking evidence

9

Page 10: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

10

IssuesIssuesIssuesIssues Martin Barker (2001: 27) compares

process to medieval witch trials.  You can only have a witch-hunt if you

believe in the existence of witchcraft.  You must have already decided in negative media effects if your question is “does this product have the potential to deprave its audience?”

Martin Barker (2001: 27) compares process to medieval witch trials.  You can only have a witch-hunt if you

believe in the existence of witchcraft.  You must have already decided in negative media effects if your question is “does this product have the potential to deprave its audience?”

Page 12: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

12

Kip Kinkel (age 15), Springfield Oregon

Kip Kinkel (age 15), Springfield Oregon

It is … a drastically different world from the childhood days of his parents, when toy soldiers and cap guns fulfilled fantasies of violence. On an internet service site he created, Kip described his hobbies as ‘role playing (video) games, Heavy metal music, violent cartoons, television, sugared cereal, throwing rocks at cars and DC comics.’

The Guardian, Saturday May 23 1998

It is … a drastically different world from the childhood days of his parents, when toy soldiers and cap guns fulfilled fantasies of violence. On an internet service site he created, Kip described his hobbies as ‘role playing (video) games, Heavy metal music, violent cartoons, television, sugared cereal, throwing rocks at cars and DC comics.’

The Guardian, Saturday May 23 1998

Page 13: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

13

Key ThemesKey Themes

Pearson (1983) outlines a cyclical repetition of fears about collapse of family, religious and moral decline, youthful insubordination and a looming crisis of civilization.

Entertainments have effects on behaviour and social attitudes.

Sheer numbers of users are the problem.

Pearson (1983) outlines a cyclical repetition of fears about collapse of family, religious and moral decline, youthful insubordination and a looming crisis of civilization.

Entertainments have effects on behaviour and social attitudes.

Sheer numbers of users are the problem.

Page 14: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

14

How to understand all this

How to understand all this

Mass society and rise of mass media and mass communications

Not just size but relationships and societal organisations

Movement from traditional societies to industrial and urban social formations

Mass society and rise of mass media and mass communications

Not just size but relationships and societal organisations

Movement from traditional societies to industrial and urban social formations

Page 15: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

15

Traditional Industrial

Land/rural Urban

Artisans Factory worker

Family Unrelated

Skilled Unskilled

Organic Mechanistic

Informal Bureaucratic

Warm Chill

Community Individual

Page 16: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

16

How to understand all this

How to understand all this

Anxiety of authorities regarding societal control, law & order

Fear of the unskilled, uneducated crowd forced together by industrialisation

Perceived of as passive and easily manipulated (to what end?)

Looks to emergence of mass communication for corruptive influence/blame

Anxiety of authorities regarding societal control, law & order

Fear of the unskilled, uneducated crowd forced together by industrialisation

Perceived of as passive and easily manipulated (to what end?)

Looks to emergence of mass communication for corruptive influence/blame

Page 17: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

17

Effects researchEffects research

Starts from a premise based in morals

Central question:“how much harm is done to vulnerable

viewers by improper media materials?”

See Gauntlett’s “10 things wrong with the effects model” for critique

Starts from a premise based in morals

Central question:“how much harm is done to vulnerable

viewers by improper media materials?”

See Gauntlett’s “10 things wrong with the effects model” for critique

Page 18: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

18

ProblemsProblems Assumes media affects behaviour, but

this needs to be argued and evidenced. Distinctive message - can we assume there

is ‘a (singular) reading’? Conceives of audience as passive

Assumes media affects behaviour, but this needs to be argued and evidenced. Distinctive message - can we assume there

is ‘a (singular) reading’? Conceives of audience as passive

Page 19: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

19

ProblemsProblems Identification… but “distinctive messag

e” of Child’s Play 3 is that standing up to evil and helping others is right even if it means risking personal sacrifice. 

Proof of media effects lies in advertising… Why would people pay for advertising if it

had no EFFECT? Common mantra of advertisers is that it

doesn’t work as we expect

Identification… but “distinctive message” of Child’s Play 3 is that standing up to evil and helping others is right even if it means risking personal sacrifice. 

Proof of media effects lies in advertising… Why would people pay for advertising if it

had no EFFECT? Common mantra of advertisers is that it

doesn’t work as we expect

Page 20: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

20

What is Violence?What is Violence?

What is “media violence”?  Rank the following in terms of the most to the least violent: Itchy and Scratchy Saving Private Ryan The Sopranos Sin City Rambo News (war) Boxing WWE wrestling Modern Warfare 3

What is “media violence”?  Rank the following in terms of the most to the least violent: Itchy and Scratchy Saving Private Ryan The Sopranos Sin City Rambo News (war) Boxing WWE wrestling Modern Warfare 3

Page 21: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

21

DefineDefine

The point is are we even talking about comparable features, let alone are they the same? 

Because “media violence” exists only in the context of narrative, characters, genres, etc it is simply a term that is impossible to define.

The point is are we even talking about comparable features, let alone are they the same? 

Because “media violence” exists only in the context of narrative, characters, genres, etc it is simply a term that is impossible to define.

Page 22: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

22

ContextContext

The idea that violence is disturbing and traumatic is bad for the audience is similarly unsustainable as it must surely depend on its function (see Schlesinger et al 1992)

The idea that violence is disturbing and traumatic is bad for the audience is similarly unsustainable as it must surely depend on its function (see Schlesinger et al 1992)

Page 23: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

23

Violence in The Sopranos:Essential or excessive?

Violence in The Sopranos:Essential or excessive?

Page 24: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

24

Violence in The Sopranos:Essential or excessive?

Violence in The Sopranos:Essential or excessive?

Page 25: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

25

Think of the children!Think of the children!• The common sense argument is based on the

need to protect children.

• Difficult to question as within our society children are regarded as vulnerable, ignorant and irrational

• BUT Buckingham (1996) observes that children become extremely sophisticated in reading media texts from an early age.  Many children are frightened by horror but this is also true of the news.  The ability to develop coping strategies for fiction but not for factual programmes shows the sophistication of children in reading texts.

• The common sense argument is based on the need to protect children.

• Difficult to question as within our society children are regarded as vulnerable, ignorant and irrational

• BUT Buckingham (1996) observes that children become extremely sophisticated in reading media texts from an early age.  Many children are frightened by horror but this is also true of the news.  The ability to develop coping strategies for fiction but not for factual programmes shows the sophistication of children in reading texts.

Page 26: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

26

Think of the children!Think of the children!

Page 27: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

Charlie Brooker Gameswipe

Charlie Brooker Gameswipe

27

Page 28: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

28

“It is now perhaps more interesting not to ask what the effects of television are, but rather why there is so much concern about the question” (Gauntlett)

“It is now perhaps more interesting not to ask what the effects of television are, but rather why there is so much concern about the question” (Gauntlett)

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Page 29: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

29

“It is now perhaps more interesting not to ask what the effects of television are, but rather why there is so much concern about the question” (Gauntlett)

Moral Panic – “a condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges as a threat to societal values and interests: its nature is presented in a stylised and stereotypical fashion by the mass media: the moral barricades are manned by editors, bishops, politicians and other right thinking people; socially accredited experts pronounce their diagnoses and solutions; ways of coping are evolved or (more often) resorted to.” (Cohen 1972, p.9)

“It is now perhaps more interesting not to ask what the effects of television are, but rather why there is so much concern about the question” (Gauntlett)

Moral Panic – “a condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges as a threat to societal values and interests: its nature is presented in a stylised and stereotypical fashion by the mass media: the moral barricades are manned by editors, bishops, politicians and other right thinking people; socially accredited experts pronounce their diagnoses and solutions; ways of coping are evolved or (more often) resorted to.” (Cohen 1972, p.9)

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Page 30: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

30

Identify problem Authorit

y response

Authority response

Media campaign

Media campaign

StigmatiseStigmatise

Simplify

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Page 31: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

31

Main Features of a Moral Panic

Main Features of a Moral Panic

Concern: behaviour of a particular group represented as having threat.

Volatility: short-lived.  Panics erupt dramatically but are difficult to sustain. Negative consequences for the rest of us.

Hostility: “folk devils” constructed to create a clear division between “them” and “us”.

Consensus: widespread acceptance of the threat posed by this group.  Not necessarily reflecting national concern, but the campaigner will be very vocal whilst the opposition will be weak and disorganised.

Disproportionality: wild exaggeration of evidence.  Not only the number of people involved but also the scale of the

Concern: behaviour of a particular group represented as having threat.

Volatility: short-lived.  Panics erupt dramatically but are difficult to sustain. Negative consequences for the rest of us.

Hostility: “folk devils” constructed to create a clear division between “them” and “us”.

Consensus: widespread acceptance of the threat posed by this group.  Not necessarily reflecting national concern, but the campaigner will be very vocal whilst the opposition will be weak and disorganised.

Disproportionality: wild exaggeration of evidence.  Not only the number of people involved but also the scale of the

Page 32: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

32

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Moral panics involve the construction of “folk devils” that need controlling, which leads to increased social control (ie regulation: BBFC, ELSPA, Ofcom, etc). 

This occurs during periods when powerful groups or the ruling classes face troubled times.  The panic then becomes a substitute for the real (and more problematic) social issues. Eg: Manhunt 2 vs BBFC

Moral panics involve the construction of “folk devils” that need controlling, which leads to increased social control (ie regulation: BBFC, ELSPA, Ofcom, etc). 

This occurs during periods when powerful groups or the ruling classes face troubled times.  The panic then becomes a substitute for the real (and more problematic) social issues. Eg: Manhunt 2 vs BBFC

Page 33: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

33

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Page 34: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

34

Identify problem Authorit

y response

Authority response

Media campaign

Media campaign

StigmatiseStigmatise

Simplify

Anxiety about media use

ADHD!Autism!Addiction!

Video games!

Public’s knowledge of science

Censor/regulate

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Moral Panics and Media Effects

Page 35: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

35

Historical PerspectiveHistorical Perspective Greek poetry, 470bc – alphabet and

allegory as corrupting Music halls, 1880s – lawlessness and

immorality Comics, 1890s – crime in London Football, 1910s – hooliganism Rock and roll, 1950s – “the Negro’s

revenge” Video Nasties, 1980s – “ban this sick filth” Video Games, 1990s-now Internet (IM, SMS, SNS), 2000s-now

Greek poetry, 470bc – alphabet and allegory as corrupting

Music halls, 1880s – lawlessness and immorality

Comics, 1890s – crime in London Football, 1910s – hooliganism Rock and roll, 1950s – “the Negro’s

revenge” Video Nasties, 1980s – “ban this sick filth” Video Games, 1990s-now Internet (IM, SMS, SNS), 2000s-now

Page 36: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

The better angels of our nature

The better angels of our nature

‘Believe it or not, violence has been in decline for long stretches of time, and we may be living in the most peaceful era in our species' existence. The decline has not been steady; it has not brought violence down to zero; and it is not guaranteed to continue. But it is a persistent historical development, visible on scales from millennia to years, from world wars and genocides to the spanking of children and the treatment of animals’

Steven Pinker, 2011, Guardian

‘Believe it or not, violence has been in decline for long stretches of time, and we may be living in the most peaceful era in our species' existence. The decline has not been steady; it has not brought violence down to zero; and it is not guaranteed to continue. But it is a persistent historical development, visible on scales from millennia to years, from world wars and genocides to the spanking of children and the treatment of animals’

Steven Pinker, 2011, Guardian36

Page 37: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

ConclusionConclusion

Vested interests in appropriating blame at the doorstep of the media

Most frequent concern is new media/cultural behaviour and practices

All media content is not the same or even for everyone

Simplistic cause and effect claims are problematic

Vested interests in appropriating blame at the doorstep of the media

Most frequent concern is new media/cultural behaviour and practices

All media content is not the same or even for everyone

Simplistic cause and effect claims are problematic

37

Page 38: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

38

Reading ListReading List Martin Barker & Kate Brooks, 1998, Knowing Audiences: Judge

Dredd, Its Friends, Fans and Foes, Luton: University of Luton Press Martin Barker & Julian Petley, 2001, Ill Effects: the Media/Violence

Debate – 2nd Edition, London: Routledge David Buckingham, 1996, Moving Images: Understanding Children’s

Emotional Responses to Television, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Stan Cohen, 1972, Folk devils and moral panics. London: MacGibbon and Kee

David Gauntlett, 1995, Moving Experiences: Understanding Television’s Influences and Effects, London: John Libbey Press

David Gauntlett, 1998, ‘Ten things wrong with the “effects” model’ http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm

Bob Hodge & David Tripp, 1986, Children and Television: A Semiotic Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press (Chapter 4: "‘God Didn’t Make Yogi Bear": The Modality of Children’s Television’, pp. 100-131)

Geoffrey Pearson, 1983, Hooligan: A History of Respectable Fears, London: Macmillan

Karen Ross & Virginia Nightengale, 2003, Media and Audiences: New perspectives, Berkshire: Open University Press (esp chapter 4)

Martin Barker & Kate Brooks, 1998, Knowing Audiences: Judge Dredd, Its Friends, Fans and Foes, Luton: University of Luton Press

Martin Barker & Julian Petley, 2001, Ill Effects: the Media/Violence Debate – 2nd Edition, London: Routledge

David Buckingham, 1996, Moving Images: Understanding Children’s Emotional Responses to Television, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Stan Cohen, 1972, Folk devils and moral panics. London: MacGibbon and Kee

David Gauntlett, 1995, Moving Experiences: Understanding Television’s Influences and Effects, London: John Libbey Press

David Gauntlett, 1998, ‘Ten things wrong with the “effects” model’ http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm

Bob Hodge & David Tripp, 1986, Children and Television: A Semiotic Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press (Chapter 4: "‘God Didn’t Make Yogi Bear": The Modality of Children’s Television’, pp. 100-131)

Geoffrey Pearson, 1983, Hooligan: A History of Respectable Fears, London: Macmillan

Karen Ross & Virginia Nightengale, 2003, Media and Audiences: New perspectives, Berkshire: Open University Press (esp chapter 4)

Page 39: Moral Panics Media Effects and Audience

39

And finally….And finally…. For examples of ill-informed pressure

groups working against what they see as media violence:

http://www.mediawatchuk.org/mainsite.htm (note, not to be confused with http://www.mediawatch.com/ who are long-term activists of media education!)

To read Henry Jenkins debunk the myth of video game violence visit:

http://www.pbs.org/kcts/videogamerevolution/impact/myths.html

For examples of ill-informed pressure groups working against what they see as media violence:

http://www.mediawatchuk.org/mainsite.htm (note, not to be confused with http://www.mediawatch.com/ who are long-term activists of media education!)

To read Henry Jenkins debunk the myth of video game violence visit:

http://www.pbs.org/kcts/videogamerevolution/impact/myths.html