Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

download Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

of 8

Transcript of Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

  • 7/28/2019 Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

    1/8

    OIL COMPANY I1C

    November 21 2008

    TO ALL EMPIRE PARTNERS

    Re Schiumberger Reserve Report

    Empire Well Plaquemines Parish LA

    Gentlemen

    Virgin utilizes Schlumberger-Holditch Reservoir Engineers for third-party calculation of

    its reserve estimates They have just completed their reserve estimates for our well at

    Empire The summary pages are enclosed for your information

    To assist you in estimating the value of your interest will show you calculation for1% ownership interest On the first page first column you will see Proved UndevelopedReserves with Future Net Income at $74518734 This is the estimated reserves wenow have behind-pipe in our well that we will be producing in the near future If you

    multiply your percentage times the future net income you will get your estimated future

    net income In my example of 1% 1% $74518734 $745187.34 The bottom rowof numbers show the future net income estimate discounted to

    present valueat 10%

    The1% would be $455116.41

    Please be advised that this is only an estimate of the reserves based on the information

    assessed at this time and the actual production may turn out to be significantly less

    Ii OL_Robert

    iith

    Presiden1

    ki

    909 Poydras Street Suite 2200 New Orleans Louisiana 70112 504-52569O9 504-529-2362 Fax

    Case 11-13028 Claim 25-1 Part 4 Filed 05/11/12 Exhibit Exhibit B to SupplementPage 1 of 8

  • 7/28/2019 Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

    2/8

    Data Consulting Seivices

    Division of Schlumborger Technology Corporation

    1515 Poydras Street Suite 2700

    ScklumhergerNew Orleans LA 70112Tel 504-592-5200

    November 20 2008

    Virgin Oil Company Inc

    909 Poydras Street Suite 2200

    New Orleans Louisiana 70112

    Attention Mr Tony Smith

    Dear Mr Smith

    At therequest of Virgin Oil Company Inc Virgin Data COnSulting Services Division ofSchiumberger Technology Corporation DCS has prepared res erve and economjc evaluation of oiland gas interests in the Empire Field owned by Virgin and its investors and located onshore inLouisiana The reserve and

    economic evaluation was prepared as of August 2008 The results of ourevaluation are summarized in the tables below

    ESTIMATED GROSS RESERVES INCOMECERTAIN OIL GAS INTERESTS

    ONSHORE LOUISIANAEVALUATED FOR VIRGIN OIL COMPANY INC

    AS OF AUGUST 2008

    ProvedProbable

    Undeveloped Proved Undeveloped ProbableAll

    Reserves ReservesReserves Reserves ReservesGross Reserves

    OilMBbls 996.841 996.841 6.365 6.365 1003.206Gas MMscf 5915.743 5915.743 937.739 937.739 6853.481

    Net Reserves

    Oil -MBbls 747.631 747.63 4.774 4.774 752.405GasMMscf 4436.807 4436.807 703.304 703.304 5J40.111

    Income Data M$Future Net Revenue 83391.805 83391.805 5257.311 5257.311 88649.1 17Deductions

    Operating

    Expenses 1015.000 1015.000 90.000 90.000 1105.000Severance Taxes 7083.059 7083059 127.576 127.576 7210.634Investment 775.000 775.000 750.000 750.000 1525.000Abandonment 0.000 500.000 0.000 0.000 500.000

    Future Net Income 74518.734 74018.734 4289.735 4289.735 78308.46

    Discounted FNI 10% 45511.641 45391.945 954.741 972.984 46364.930

    Case 11-13028 Claim 25-1 Part 4 Filed 05/11/12 Exhibit Exhibit B to SupplementPage 2 of 8

  • 7/28/2019 Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

    3/8

    Data Consulting SeMcos

    Division of Schiumberger Technology Corporation

    SchiumbergerNovember 20 2008

    Page

    The Gross Reserves in the above table are to 100%working interest in the lee No deductions havebeen made for royalties and overriding royalties The Net Reserves and all Income

    data in the abovetables are t o th e net interests that Virgin provided Appropriate deductions have been made for royaltiesand overriding royalties

    The values shown in the tables above are from the economic summaries in EXhibit of thereport Thosevalues may not add up arithmetically due to rounding procedures in the computer software

    program usedto prepare the economic projections Exhibit contains summaries by reservescategory Exhibit alsocontains individual

    property economics In those cases where the tables above or in the Exhibit includeProved Probable and Possiblereserves the reserves and income

    attributable t o t he various reservecategories have not been adjusted to reflect the varying degrees of risk associated with them and t he y a renot comparable

    RESERVE CATEGORIES

    This report includes proved undeveloped and probable reserves as of August 2008 By definition oiland gas reserves belong to one of thefollowing categories proved probable or possible These

    categories are further divided intoa pp ro pr ia te r es er ve status

    categories developed andundevelopedThe devekped reserve category is even further divided into the

    appropriate r es er ve s ta tu s subcategories producing and nonproducing Nonproducing reserves include shut-in andbehind-pipereserves

    The reserve categories used in this report conform t o th e definitions Deterministic Method approvedby the Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc Board ofDirectors March 1997 The definitions ofproved probable and possible reserves are presented in Exhibit of this report

    RESERVE ESTIMATES

    The reserves that DCS estimated or audited were estimatedusing generally accepted petroleum

    engineering practices These reserves estimated by performanceanalysis material balance andvolumetric calculations

    Reserve estimates are strictly technical judgme nts Theaccuracy of any reserve estimate is function ofthe

    quality of data available and of engineering and geological interpretation The reserve estimatesprepared by or audited by DCS and presented in this

    report are believed reasonable however they areestimates only and should be acepted with theunderstanding that reservoir performance

    subsequent tothe date of the estimate may justify their revision

    Case 11-13028 Claim 25-1 Part 4 Filed 05/11/12 Exhibit Exhibit B to SupplementPage 3 of 8

  • 7/28/2019 Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

    4/8

    Data Consulting Services

    Division of Schiumberger Technology Corporation

    Schhinthorger

    November20 2008

    Page

    PRICING AND ESCALATION PARAMETERS

    All oil and gas product prices price differentials operating expenses capital Investments abandonmentcosts and escalation parameters were provided by Virgin prior to preparation of this

    report The pricesdifferentials expenses investments abandonmentcosts and escalation parameters are listed below

    gas price of $7.000 per MMscf was used for the life of the project Gasprices werenot escalated

    Oil An oil price of $70.00 per Bbl was used for the life of the project Oil prices were notescalated

    Monthly Lease Operating Expense Monthly lease operating Costs were based on estimatesmade by Virgin The lease operating costs were not escalated

    Capital Investments The capital investments were based on estimates made by Virgin For

    purposesof this

    reportthe

    capital investments for Drilling and Completing the well havebeen excluded The capital investments were not escalated

    Abandonment Costs The abandonment costs were based on estimates made by Virgin Thecapital investments were not escalated

    Severance Tax Louisiana Severance taxes were included

    OWNERSHIP

    The leasehold interests were provided by Virgin No attempt was made by the undersigned to verify thetitle or

    ownershipevaluated

    GENERAL

    All data used i n t hi s study were obtained from Virgin the operator of the welt public industryinformation sources or the non-confidential files of DCS field inspection of the properties was notmade in connection with the

    preparation of this report Abandonment costs were included in this reportbut other potential environmental liabilities a tt en da nt t o

    ownership and/or operation of the propertieswere not included in this report

    In evaluating the information at our disposal r ela te d t o this report we have excluded from ourconsideration all matters which require legal or

    accounting interpretation or any interpretation otherthan those of an engineering or geological nature In assessing the conclusions expressed in this reportpertaining to all aspects of oil and gas evaluations especially pertaining to reserve evaluations t he re a reuncertainties inherent in the

    interpretation of engineering data and such conclusionsrepresent only

    informed professional judgments

    Case 11-13028 Claim 25-1 Part 4 Filed 05/11/12 Exhibit Exhibit B to SupplementPage 4 of 8

  • 7/28/2019 Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

    5/8

    Data Consulting Services

    Division of Schiumberger Technology Corporation

    Schlumberger

    November 20 2008

    Page

    Data and worksheets used in thepreparation of this evaluation will be maintained in our files in NewOrleans and will be available for inspection by anyone having proper authorization by Virgin

    This report was prepared solely for the use of theparty to whom it is addressed and

    any disclosure made

    bysaid

    partyof this

    report and/or the contents thereofshafl be solely theresponsibility of said party andshall in no way constitute any representation of any kind whatsoever of the

    Undersigned with respect tothe matters being addressed

    Should you need further assistance in this matter please contact the following DCSemployee who cananswer your questions

    James HubbardPrincipal Petroleum Engineer New Orleans

    We appreciate the opportunity to serve you and look forward to doing business with you in the future

    Verytruly yours

    DATA CONSULTING SERVICESDIVISION OF SCHLUMBERGERTECHNOLOGy CORPORATION

    James Hubbard P.13

    Principal Petroleum Engineer

    Case 11-13028 Claim 25-1 Part 4 Filed 05/11/12 Exhibit Exhibit B to SupplementPage 5 of 8

  • 7/28/2019 Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

    6/8

    Virgin Oil

    Well Hookup

    State Lease 18165

    Empire

    Est Start Date____________

    Est Comp Date 2nd Qtr 2009

    Description

    Mobilization Costs

    Transportation

    Communications Permanent Temporary

    Permitting Regulatory

    Inspection Costs

    Construction Servits

    Engineering Consulting Services

    Shallow Hazard Site Survey

    Insurance Bonds

    lE Instrumentation/Electrical/SCADA

    Construction Overhead

    lntanaibles total

    Total

    7000

    1900

    250

    4250

    21000

    96000

    15900

    9000

    25600

    6000

    8000

    194900

    Estimated Tangibles Expenses

    Description

    Site Preparation

    Surface Production Equipment

    SCADA Electrical Equipment

    Gulf South Meter Station

    ATMOS Energy Flowline Hot Tap

    Pipe/Pipe Support/Fittings/ValvesHook-Up

    Supplies Chemicals

    Pipeline Labor Materials

    Gas Sales Hot tap and meter skid

    Total

    93000

    205200

    42000

    66000

    35000

    50000

    7500

    6000

    35000

    539700

    Estimated Construction Days

    Prepared By Earl Landrv

    25

    SI

    Date 19-Jan-09

    Project

    Location

    Field

    AFE

    Estimated Intangibles Expenses

    Tangibles total

    Contingencies 20% 146900

    Grand Total 881500

    Reviewed By Brennan Disher

    Case 11-13028 Claim 25-1 Part 4 Filed 05/11/12 Exhibit Exhibit B to SupplementPage 6 of 8

  • 7/28/2019 Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

    7/8

    II

    October 28 2008

    MEMO TO PARTNERS

    Re Virgin Offshore USA Inc S.L 18165 Sidetrack Empire ProspectPlaquemines Parish Louisiana

    Ladies and Gentlemen

    The following is brief summary of the results obtained in the drilling of the above

    referenced well have tried to provide daily updates throughout last week as weencountered the objective Sands have attached an annotated LWD 100 true

    vertical depth log over these objective Sands Each of objective sands came in as

    mapped expected and are productive with the exception of the Sand which showedresidual

    gas saturations probabjy as result of cross fault drainage

    The subject well reached its planned total depth of 11860 MD 9537 TVD October22 2008 5/8 production casing has been successfully run to total depth and cemented

    in place We are currently laying down drill pipe and will release the drilling rig over the

    course of the next few days completion procedure is currently being planned

    designed and will be implemented with work-over completion rig much more costeffective and efficient method Current plans are to dually complete the well i.e two

    tubing strings in the well bore with primary completion in each string producing

    simultaneously andselective

    completionin

    each string which allows for immediateproduction of an up-hole zone immediately upon the depletion of the primary completion

    Once this procedure has been finalized and costs estimated we will immediately forward

    same to you Included in these costs will be the installation of production facility

    including tank battery for the storing of oil and gas line less than 100 yards to our

    gas market Obviously we intend to expedite the completion first production of the

    well Our goal is to have the well on-line within 90 days

    As stated above we intend to dually complete the well to maximize cash flow and

    expedite depletion of the reserves t o a id the present worth profiles on the reserves While

    more costly on the front-end it is tremendous boost to economics My current thoughtson this dual are as follows

    Long String

    Primary Completion K-6 Sand Estimated rate .75MMCFGD 25BCPDSelective Completion K-5 Sand Lwr Estimated rate .75MMCFGD 75BCPD

    Short String

    Primary Completion K-5 Sand Upr Estimated rate 25OBOPDSelective Completion K-2B Sand Estimated rate 25OBOPD

    Case 11-13028 Claim 25-1 Part 4 Filed 05/11/12 Exhibit Exhibit B to SupplementPage 7 of 8

  • 7/28/2019 Montecito Exhibit b to Supplement

    8/8

    Consequently our initial rate would be estimated to be .75MMCFGD 375B0PD At currentpricing and after lease operating expenses initial monthly net cash flow from the well is estimated tobe $750000.00 This would provide an extraordinary rate of return on Our investment Please keepin mind that these rates are my estimates and are subject to change upward or downward as we testthe zones do believe them to be reasonable estimates based on my knowledge of the offset

    productionin the Empire Field and interpretation of the well logs Upon depletion of the Primary

    and Selective Completions in both strings the well would be worked-over to capture reserves in the

    K-2A and possible reserves in the K-i Sand

    My current estimates of reserves are as followsProved 3.5 BCFG 500 MBO

    Possible 1.0 BCFG 400 MBO

    The Proved reserves would yield estimated future net revenue under current pricing of

    approximately $3 8MM undiscounted and before lease operating expenses These future revenueswould provide nice multiple on the investment Obviously the reservoir engineers will have the

    final say on reserves but feel these estimates are reasonable

    Sincerely

    Charlie Roberts

    Exploration Manager

    Case 11-13028 Claim 25-1 Part 4 Filed 05/11/12 Exhibit Exhibit B to SupplementPage 8 of 8