Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly 16 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Competition, you...
-
Upload
hillary-hortense-phillips -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly 16 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Competition, you...
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Competition, you know, is a lot like chastity. It is widely praised, but alas, too little practiced.
— Carol Tucker
CHAPTER
16
Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Chapter Goals
• List the four distinguishing characteristics of monopolistic competition
• State the central element of oligopoly
• Demonstrate graphically the equilibrium of a monopolistic competitor
• Explain why decisions in the cartel model depend on market share and decisions in the contestable market model depend on barriers to entry
• Describe two empirical methods of determining market structure
16-2
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Market Structure
• Market structure refers to the physical characteristics of the market within which firms interact
• An oligopolistic market is a market in which there are only a few firms and firms explicitly take other firms’ likely response into account
• A monopolistically competitive market is a market in which there are many firms selling differentiated products and few barriers to entry
• It is determined by the number of firms in the market and the barriers to entry
16-3
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition
Four distinguishing characteristics:
3. Multiple dimensions of competition make it harder to analyze a specific industry, but these methods of competition follow the same two decision rules as price competition
2. Product differentiation where the goods that are sold aren’t homogenous
1. Many sellers that do not take into account rivals’ reactions
4. Ease of entry of new firms in the long run because there are no significant barriers to entry
16-4
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Output, Price, and Profit of a Monopolistic Competitor
• Like a monopoly,
• At profit maximizing output, marginal cost will be less than price
• Marginal revenue is below price
• Like a perfect competitor, zero economic profits exist in the long run
• The monopolistic competitive firm has some monopoly power so the firm faces a downward sloping demand curve
16-5
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Q
P
ATCBreak even
Q
MC
D
MR
A monopolistic firm can earn profits, losses, or
break even in the short run
Determining Profits Graphically: Monopolistic Competition
Losses
Break even
Profits
P
ATCLosses
ATCProfits
ATCL
ATCP
16-6
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Monopolistic Competition Compared with Perfect Competition Graph
Outcome: Monopolistic competition
output is lower and price is higher than perfect competition
• In monopolistic competition in the long run, P > min ATC,
• In perfect competition in the long run, P = min ATC
Q
P
ATC
QMC
MC
DMC
MRMC
PMC
PPCDPC
QPC
16-7
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Comparing Monopolistic Competition with Monopoly
• For a monopolistic competitor in long-run equilibrium, (P = ATC) ≥ (MC = MR)
• No long-run economic profit is possible in monopolistic competition because there are no significant barriers to entry
• It is possible for the monopolist to make economic profit in the long run because of the existence of barriers to entry
16-8
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Advertising and Monopolistic Competition
• Advertising increases ATC
• The goals of advertising are to increase demand and make demand more inelastic
• Perfectly competitive firms have no incentive to advertise, but monopolistic competitors do
• The increase in cost of a monopolistically competitive product is the cost of “differentness”
16-9
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Characteristics of Oligopoly
• Oligopolies are made up of a small number of firms in an industry
• Oligopolistic firms are mutually interdependent
• In any decision a firm makes, it must take into account the expected reaction of other firms
• Oligopolies can be collusive or noncollusive
• Firms may engage in strategic decision making where each firm takes explicit account of a rival’s expected response to a decision it is making
16-10
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Models of Oligopoly Behavior
• There is no single model of oligopoly behavior
• The cartel model is when a combination of firms acts as if it were a single firm and a monopoly price is set
• An oligopoly model can take two extremes:
• The contestable market model is a model of oligopolies where barriers to entry and exit, not market structure, determine price and output decisions and a competitive price is set
• Other models of oligopolies give price results between the two extremes
16-11
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
The Cartel Model
• A cartel model of oligopoly is a model that assumes that oligopolies act as if they were a monopoly and set a price to maximize profit
• Output quotas are assigned to individual member firms so that total output is consistent with joint profit maximization
• If oligopolies can limit the entry of other firms, they can increase profits
16-12
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Implicit Price Collusion
• Explicit (formal) collusion is illegal in the U.S. while implicit (informal) collusion is permitted
• Implicit price collusion exists when multiple firms make the same pricing decisions even though they have not consulted with one another
• Sometimes the largest or most dominant firm takes the lead in setting prices and the others follow
16-13
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Why Are Prices Sticky?
• One characteristic of informal collusive behavior is that prices tend to be sticky – they don’t change frequently
• Informal collusion is an important reason why prices are sticky
• Another is the kinked demand curve
• If a firm increases price, others won’t go along, so demand is very elastic for price increases
• If a firm lowers price, other firms match the decrease, so demand is inelastic for price decreases
16-14
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
The Kinked Demand Curve Graph
• A gap in the MR curve exists
• A large shift in marginal cost is required before firms will change their price
Q
P
Q
MC1
DMR
P
If P increases, others won’t go along, so D is elastic
If P decreases, other firms match the decrease, so D
is inelastic
MC2
Gap
16-15
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
The Contestable Market Model
• The contestable market model is a model of oligopolies where barriers to entry and exit, not market structure, determine price and output decisions and a competitive price is set
• Even if the industry contains only one firm, it will set a competitive price if there are no barriers to entry
• Much of what happens in oligopoly pricing is dependent on the specific legal structure within which firms interact
16-16
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Comparing Contestable Market and Cartel Models
• The cartel model is appropriate for oligopolists that collude, set a monopoly price, and prevent market entry
• The contestable market model describes oligopolies that set a competitive price and have no barriers to entry
• Oligopoly markets lie between these two extremes
• Both models use strategic pricing decisions where firms set their price based on the expected reactions of other firms
16-17
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
New Entry as a Limit on the Cartelization Strategy and Price Wars
• Price wars are the result of strategic pricing decisions gone wild
• A predatory pricing strategy involves temporarily pushing the price down in order to drive a competitor out of business
• The threat of outside competition limits oligopolies from acting as a cartel
• The threat will be more effective if the outside competitor is much larger than the firms in the oligopoly
16-18
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Comparison of Market Structures
Monopoly OligopolyMonopolistic Competition
Perfect Competition
No. of firms One Few Many Almost infinite
Barriers to entry Significant Significant Few None
Pricing decisions MC = MRStrategic pricing
MC = MR MC = MR = P
Output decisionsMost output restriction
Output restricted
Output restricted, product
differentiation
No output restriction
InterdependenceNo
competitorsInterdependent
decisions Each firm
independentEach firm
independent
LR profit Possible Possible None None
P and MC P > MC P > MC P > MC P = MC
16-19
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Classifying Industries and Markets in Practice
• An industry seldom fits neatly into one category or another
• Cross-price elasticity measures the responsiveness of the change in demand for a good to a change in the price of a related good
• One way to classify markets in practice is by its cross price elasticity
• Goods with a cross-price elasticity of 3 or more are in the same industry
16-20
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
The North American Industry Classification System
• North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is an industry classification system that categorizes industries by the type of economic activity and groups firms with like production processes
Two Digit Sectors Three to Six Digit Sectors
23 Construction
42 Wholesale Trade
51 Information517 –Telecommunications5172 – Wireless telecommunications carriers517211 – Paging
61 Education Services
16-21
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Empirical Measures of Industry Structure
• The concentration ratio is the value of sales by the top firms of an industry stated as a percentage of total industry sales
• Because it squares market shares, the Herfindahl index gives more weight to firms with large market shares than does the concentration ratio measure
• The Herfindahl index is the sum of the squared value of the individual market shares of all firms in the industry
16-22
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Concentration Ratios and the Herfindahl Index
IndustryFour Firm
Concentration Ratio Herfindahl Index
Poultry 46 773
Soft drinks 52 896
Breakfast cereal 78 2,999
Soap and detergent 38 664
Men’s footwear 44 734
Women’s footwear 64 1,556
Pharmaceuticals 34 506
Computer equipment 49 1,183
Burial caskets 73 2,965
16-23
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Conglomerate Firms and Bigness
• Neither the four-firm concentration ratio nor the Herfindahl index gives a complete picture of corporations’ bigness because many firms are conglomerates
• Conglomerates are huge corporations whose activities span various unrelated industries
16-24
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Oligopoly Models and Empirical Estimates of Market Structure
• The cartel model fits best with empirical measurements because it assumes that the structure of the market is directly related to the price a firm charges
• The contestable market model gives less weight to the empirical estimates of market structure
• It predicts that oligopolies charge higher prices than monopolistic or perfect competitors
• Markets that look oligopolistic could be highly competitive
16-25
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Chapter Summary
• Monopolistic competition is characterized by:
• Many sellers
• Differentiated products
• Multiple dimensions of competition
• Ease of entry of new firms
• The central characteristic of oligopoly is that there are a small number of interdependent firms
• Monopolistic competitors differ from perfect competitors in that the former face a downward sloping demand curve
16-26
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Chapter Summary
• Monopolistic competitors differ from monopolists in that monopolistic competitors make zero long-run profit
• In monopolistic competition firms act independently; in an oligopoly they take account of each other’s actions
• An oligopolist’s price will be somewhere between the competitive price and the monopolistic price
• A contestable market theory of oligopoly judges an industry’s competitiveness more by performance and barriers to entry than by structure
16-27
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Chapter Summary
• Cartel models of oligopoly concentrate on market structure
• Industries are classified by economic activity in the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
• Industry structures are measured by concentration ratios and Herfindahl indexes
• A concentration ratio is the sum of market shares of the largest firms in an industry
• A Herfindahl index is the sum of the squares of the market shares of all firms in an industry
16-28
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
16
Preview of Chapter 17: Real-World Competition and Technology
• Discuss the monitoring problem and its implications for economics
• Discuss why competition should be seen as a process, not a state
• Explain how corporate takeovers can limit X-inefficiency
• Explain two actions firms take to break down monopoly and three they take to protect monopoly
• Discuss why oligopoly is the best market structure for technological change
16-29