2013 OEMS Prehospital Protocol Update Amy Gutman MD EMS Medical Director [email protected] / .
Monitoring Trauma Patients in the Prehospital and Hospital ...and inputs into intelligent medical...
Transcript of Monitoring Trauma Patients in the Prehospital and Hospital ...and inputs into intelligent medical...
Monitoring Trauma Patients in the Prehospitaland Hospital Environments: The Need for Better Monitors and Advanced Automation
Monitoring Trauma Patients in the Prehospitaland Hospital Environments: The Need for Better Monitors and Advanced Automation
José Salinas, [email protected]
210-916-0806
José Salinas, [email protected]
210-916-0806
Report Documentation Page Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number.
1. REPORT DATE 05 APR 2008 2. REPORT TYPE
3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2008 to 00-00-2008
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Monitoring Trauma Patients in the Prehospital and HospitalEnvironments: The Need for Better Monitors and Advanced Automation
5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
5b. GRANT NUMBER
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER
5e. TASK NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research,Fort Sam Houston,TX,78234
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)
11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S)
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Army Telemedicine Partnerships Series 2008: ?Personal Health Monitoring?, Seattle, WA, 5 Apr 2008
14. ABSTRACT
15. SUBJECT TERMS
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT Same as
Report (SAR)
18. NUMBEROF PAGES
31
19a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSON
a. REPORT unclassified
b. ABSTRACT unclassified
c. THIS PAGE unclassified
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
22
BackgroundBackground
• Diagnosis in the prehospital and/or hospital environments is often inaccurate for trauma patients
• Current prehospital monitors measure vital signs that are not predictive of outcome in many instances– Systolic Blood Pressure– Heart Rate– SpO2
• Diagnosis in the prehospital and/or hospital environments is often inaccurate for trauma patients
• Current prehospital monitors measure vital signs that are not predictive of outcome in many instances– Systolic Blood Pressure– Heart Rate– SpO2
Cooke, et al., Heart Rate Variability in Pre-Hospital Trauma patients. J Trauma, 2006
33
Standard Vital SignsStandard Vital Signs
lived (n = 15) lived (n = 15)
died (n = 15) died (n = 15)
systolicsystolic
diastolicdiastolicmeanmean
2020
4040
6060
8080
100100
120120ar
teria
l pre
ssur
e,
mm
Hg
arte
rial p
ress
ure,
m
mH
g
livedlived dieddied00
2020
4040
6060
8080
100100
Art
eria
l O2
Sat
ura
tio
n, %
Art
eria
l O2
Sat
ura
tio
n, %
00
2020
4040
6060
8080
100100
120120
Pu
lse
Rat
e, b
pm
Pu
lse
Rat
e, b
pm
livedlived dieddied
44
Grouped Vital Signs Do Not Predict Need for Life Saving Interventions
Grouped Vital Signs Do Not Predict Need for Life Saving Interventions
• Considered 3 data sets based on instrument requirements– Manual (MG)– Semi-Automated (SG)– Automated (AG)
• Considered 3 data sets based on instrument requirements– Manual (MG)– Semi-Automated (SG)– Automated (AG)
Manual GroupManual GroupSemi-AutomatedGroup
Semi-AutomatedGroup
Automated GroupAutomated Group
• Demographics (Age, Sex)• Pulse Character (Radial, Femoral, Carotid)• GCS Motor, GCS Verbal• Capillary Refill
• Demographics (Age, Sex)• Pulse Character (Radial, Femoral, Carotid)• GCS Motor, GCS Verbal• Capillary Refill
GCS Eye SpO2
GCS Eye SpO2
• Electronic monitor• Automated NIBP
(Systolic, Diastolic)
• Heart Rate• EtCO2• Automated
Respiration Rate
• Electronic monitor• Automated NIBP
(Systolic, Diastolic)
• Heart Rate• EtCO2• Automated
Respiration Rate
Holcomb, et al. Manual Vital Signs Reliably Predict the Need for LSI’s. Oct 2005, J Trauma, 2005.
55
ProblemProblem
==
Manual Vital SignsPhysical Exam
Manual Vital SignsPhysical Exam Electronic Vital SignsElectronic Vital Signs
No difference in prediction of outcomeNo difference in prediction of outcome
66
Triage ProblemTriage Problem
• Civilian:– Consistent overtriage and undertriage problem in the
prehospital trauma environment– Not unusual to have a 50% overtriage within a large urban
area
• Military: – Inability to effectively predict evacuation requirements
balanced with tactical considerations
• Civilian:– Consistent overtriage and undertriage problem in the
prehospital trauma environment– Not unusual to have a 50% overtriage within a large urban
area
• Military: – Inability to effectively predict evacuation requirements
balanced with tactical considerations
Cause:Inability to accurately determine
patient status using current methodologies/technologies.
Cause:Inability to accurately determine
patient status using current methodologies/technologies.
77
Environment: Medic InjuredTrying to Save Fallen Comrade
Environment: Medic InjuredTrying to Save Fallen Comrade
11 22
33 44
88
Bottom LineBottom Line
Current monitors present data that is not predictive of eventual physiologic decompensation and are thus inadequate!
Current monitors present data that is not predictive of eventual physiologic decompensation and are thus inadequate!
99
SolutionSolution
• We need a new type of monitor!
• Requirements– Accurate diagnosis of patient status– Small/Lightweight– Remote/wireless operation– Intelligent Decision assist
technology– Autonomous/closed loop technology
for long term care
• We need a new type of monitor!
• Requirements– Accurate diagnosis of patient status– Small/Lightweight– Remote/wireless operation– Intelligent Decision assist
technology– Autonomous/closed loop technology
for long term care
1010
Accurate Diagnosis of Trauma Patients
Accurate Diagnosis of Trauma Patients
• Need to use new/advanced vital signs– Pulse Pressure– Shock Index
• Explore combinations of vital signs to enhance probability of correct diagnosis
• Make use of vital sign trends
• Use characteristics of high frequency waveforms– Heart Rate Variability– Heart Rate Complexity– Non Linear ECG Dynamics
• Need to use new/advanced vital signs– Pulse Pressure– Shock Index
• Explore combinations of vital signs to enhance probability of correct diagnosis
• Make use of vital sign trends
• Use characteristics of high frequency waveforms– Heart Rate Variability– Heart Rate Complexity– Non Linear ECG Dynamics
1111
Pulse PressurePulse Pressure
• Statistically significant for tracking stroke volume
• Statistically significant for tracking stroke volume
1212
Combination Vital SignsCombination Vital SignsCombination of Shock Index, Shock Index Trend,
Respiratory Rate
No Physical ExamPhysical Exam
1313
Waveform HR variabilityWaveform HR variability
frequency, Hz0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
RR
I PSD
, ms2 /H
z
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000patients who diedpatients who lived
Measures Sympathetic/Parasympathetic activity based on the frequency distribution of the RRI values.
1414
Waveform ComplexityWaveform Complexity
1 .00 .80 .60 .40 .20 .01 - S p ec ific ity
1 .0
0 .8
0 .6
0 .4
0 .2
0 .0
Sens
itivi
ty
1 .00 .80 .60 .40 .20 .01 - S p ec ific ity
1 .0
0 .8
0 .6
0 .4
0 .2
0 .0
Sens
itivi
ty
PhysicalExam
HRV
Physical Exam, HRV,Complexity
Quantifies the regularity of the HR signal through entropy calculations with in the RRI values.
Pred
ictio
n of
LSI
1515
Addition of more parametersAddition of more parameters
• Parameter Survival ROC• Single Vital Signs 0.75• Physiology and Trends 0.80• Physiological Variability 0.85• Physiology, Coagulation, 0.96
and Immunology
• The more significant data we get, the more predictive we can be!
• Parameter Survival ROC• Single Vital Signs 0.75• Physiology and Trends 0.80• Physiological Variability 0.85• Physiology, Coagulation, 0.96
and Immunology
• The more significant data we get, the more predictive we can be!
1616
ProblemProblem
• Monitoring can be enhanced to further improve patient care…However:
“We keep monitoring patients to death”-- Anonymous
• Monitoring can be enhanced to further improve patient care…However:
“We keep monitoring patients to death”-- Anonymous
1717
Now What?Now What?
• Use enhanced prediction algorithms and inputs into intelligent medical systems to better assist medical providers– Decision Support Systems– Advanced Triage Systems
• Move validated medical systems into full automation for closed loop care of patients
• Use enhanced prediction algorithms and inputs into intelligent medical systems to better assist medical providers– Decision Support Systems– Advanced Triage Systems
• Move validated medical systems into full automation for closed loop care of patients
1818
Decision Assist (support) Technology
Decision Assist (support) Technology
• Decision support systems are a class of computer-based information systems that support decision making activities– Type of intervention
• What intervention to use based on the expertise of the user
– When do we apply intervention?– Where should a patient be taken based on
readings?– Where should a patient be transported to?
• Decision support systems are a class of computer-based information systems that support decision making activities– Type of intervention
• What intervention to use based on the expertise of the user
– When do we apply intervention?– Where should a patient be taken based on
readings?– Where should a patient be transported to?
1919
BenefitsBenefits
• Helps to remind experts on proper patient care during critical procedures and/or mass casualty situations
• “Pushes” the expertise built into the software to non-expert providers– i.e. burn standard of care procedures for field
use
• Maintains the open loop concept – Not a replacement for good clinical judgment
• Helps to remind experts on proper patient care during critical procedures and/or mass casualty situations
• “Pushes” the expertise built into the software to non-expert providers– i.e. burn standard of care procedures for field
use
• Maintains the open loop concept – Not a replacement for good clinical judgment
2020
Types of DSSTypes of DSS
• Model Driven– Used for statistical data manipulation– Example: Expected response of a company’s stock to a
selloff• Communication Driven
– Used for coordination of tasks between users• Data Driven
– Used for manipulation of time series data• Document Driven
– Manipulation of unstructured information from documents• Knowledge Driven
– Most appropriate for medical systems– Emphasizes problem solving skills
• Model Driven– Used for statistical data manipulation– Example: Expected response of a company’s stock to a
selloff• Communication Driven
– Used for coordination of tasks between users• Data Driven
– Used for manipulation of time series data• Document Driven
– Manipulation of unstructured information from documents• Knowledge Driven
– Most appropriate for medical systems– Emphasizes problem solving skills
2121
USAISR DSS ExamplesUSAISR DSS Examples
• ICU DSS Framework– Decision support framework for management of
burn patients admitted to the USAISR Burn Center ICU
• Resuscitation – Implemented• Tight glucose control - Implemented• Hypotension management – Working• Albumin use - Working• Abdominal compartment syndrome diagnosis and
management - Working
• Mobile Burn Resuscitation– Decision support for burn resuscitation in a
mobile/handheld system for field resuscitation
• ICU DSS Framework– Decision support framework for management of
burn patients admitted to the USAISR Burn Center ICU
• Resuscitation – Implemented• Tight glucose control - Implemented• Hypotension management – Working• Albumin use - Working• Abdominal compartment syndrome diagnosis and
management - Working
• Mobile Burn Resuscitation– Decision support for burn resuscitation in a
mobile/handheld system for field resuscitation
2222
Automation and Closed LoopAutomation and Closed Loop
• Use accurate inputs to control therapy for patient care– Examples:
• Resuscitation• Ventilation• Pain Control• Hemorrhage
• Feedback system allows for more accurate delivery of therapy
• Use accurate inputs to control therapy for patient care– Examples:
• Resuscitation• Ventilation• Pain Control• Hemorrhage
• Feedback system allows for more accurate delivery of therapy
2323
Action Shots of DSS (ICU Version)Action Shots of DSS (ICU Version)
2424
Action shots of DSS (Mobile)Action shots of DSS (Mobile)
2525
The FutureThe Future
• Full Automation– Closed loop
• Computer control of sensors and actuators
– Automated patient management
• Full Automation– Closed loop
• Computer control of sensors and actuators
– Automated patient management
2626
Modules• Aspirator• I.V. pumps• Multipatient monitor (SpO2, ECG,
NIBP)• Patient controlled analgesia • Spirometer• O2 concentrator• Patient warming• Stress test• Anesthesia Module• Ultrasound imaging• Visualization
– Oto/opthalmoscope– macrolens camera
Integral• Ventilator• 12-lead ECG• Pulse-Ox• NIBP• Data I/O• Electronic med.
record
• CO2• AED• Temperature• Invasive pressure• Remote C2
• Smart help• Closed-loop control
Lightweight Trauma Module (LTM), Impact Instrumentations
Lightweight Trauma Module (LTM), Impact Instrumentations
• Respiratory mechanics• Pulse Pressure, Shock Index, HRV
2727
Wireless Vital Signs Monitor (WVSM), Athena GTX
Wireless Vital Signs Monitor (WVSM), Athena GTX
An Automated Wireless, Battery Powered Medical Tool to Assist the Medical Personnel in the Field and
Hospitals in Tracking and Monitoring Patients’ Vital Signs
Continuously….in a small and affordable package using WLAN and
MS Windows O/S
An Automated Wireless, Battery Powered Medical Tool to Assist the Medical Personnel in the Field and
Hospitals in Tracking and Monitoring Patients’ Vital Signs
Continuously….in a small and affordable package using WLAN and
MS Windows O/S
2828
ClosedClosed--Loop Resuscitation of Burn InjuryLoop Resuscitation of Burn Injury
PC controller
Bard® Urine Monitor
PC-Visual Basic controller
IV Pump
Sheep +IV access & bladder catheter
* G Kramer, University of Texas Medical Branch
2929
17338%
p = 0.651.10 (CI 0.74,
1.65)
7316%
p = 0.020.58 (CI 0.38,
0.89)
21447%
p = 0.231.31 (CI 0.85, 2.0)
CLR controlled
10 sheep, 475 measurement
s
17535%
12225%
19840%
Tech Control 11 sheep, 508 measurement
s
over-targetunder-target
on-targetGroup
target range defined as 1.0 – 2.0 mL/hr target
Hourly Urinary Outputs: on-target, under-target and over-target
* G Kramer, University of Texas Medical Branch
3030
ConclusionConclusion
• Need better monitoring technologies– New vital signs– Combinations of standard, new, and trended
vital signs– Advanced complexity vital signs
• Need to develop decision support systems– Additional tools to expert users– Better care for non-expert care providers– Open loop concept
• Future: Closed loop and automation– Computer control of sensors and actuators
• Need better monitoring technologies– New vital signs– Combinations of standard, new, and trended
vital signs– Advanced complexity vital signs
• Need to develop decision support systems– Additional tools to expert users– Better care for non-expert care providers– Open loop concept
• Future: Closed loop and automation– Computer control of sensors and actuators
3131
QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?