Monitoring at the Household Level Methods, Problems, and Use of Critical Information.
-
Upload
solomon-james -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of Monitoring at the Household Level Methods, Problems, and Use of Critical Information.
Monitoring at the Household Level
Methods, Problems, and Use of Critical Information
A Simplified Conceptual Outline: Where does this information fit?
• Provision of services: Adequately iodized salt must be available in the marketplace
• Utilization of services: Consumers must be aware of the importance, and use iodized salt
• Coverage: An adequate proportion of the population must consistently use iodized salt
• Impact: Periodic measurement should show adequate iodine intake as measured by urinary iodine
Salt Production,
Importation, and
Distribution
Is iodized salt available?
Does it meet the iodine needs of the
population?
Does it consistently meet standards?
??
?
Internal and External Monitoring
Provision of services
Salt Production,
Importation, and
Distribution
Insures that salt available to population meets government legal requirements regarding
iodine content
Internal and External Monitoring
Use of Iodized Salt,
Awareness, Cost
And Cultural Habits
Is iodized salt being used?
Does the population
recognize the importance?
??
?
KAP studies, IEC evaluations, price and consumption surveys
Utilization of services
Use of Iodized Salt,
Awareness, Cost
And Cultural Habits
KAP studies, IEC evaluations, price and consumption surveys
Provides an understanding of constraints to use of iodized
salt that may ultimately affect coverage
Household Use
of Iodized
Salt
Do the majority of households
use iodized salt?
Are some groups missed?
??
?
Household coverage surveys, sentinel site coverage assessment
Coverage
Household Use
of Iodized
Salt
Household coverage surveys, sentinel site coverage assessment
Provides a quantitative measure of household use,
and can confirm adequacy of iodine content throughout
distribution
Iodine Status of
The Population
Has iodine deficiency been
eliminated?
Are any groups still deficient?
??
?
Urinary Iodine Assessment in different population
groups
Impact
Iodine Status of
The Population
Urinary Iodine Assessment in different population
groups
Confirms elimination of iodine deficiency at the
population level, or among different high risk target
groups
• Household level monitoring includes understanding purchasing patterns using qualitative techniques, and estimating coverage
• Coverage may be single most important indicator
Assessing Purchasing Habits and Preferences
• KAP surveys, focus group discussions, key informant interviews and other qualitative techniques are used
• Helps with initial program development, in understand key issues influencing decision to use iodized salt, including price, mis-perceptions or concerns about safety and usage, cultural habits
• Usually do not need to assess quantity of salt consumed: varies from 5-15 gms/person/day on average
Assessing Coverage
• Can use sentinel models to assess specific geographic areas
• Ideally population-based, representative sampling at a national level, on a periodic basis
Salt testing in
schools can provide
coverage estimate, while
building awareness • Developed as part of science curriculum•Uses salt test kits to demonstrate presence of iodine•Provides a rough coverage estimate among households with children attending the school
Questions raised :
• Coverage within sentinel sites (schools, clinics)
Is the figure representative of all endemic areas?
Is there bias due to the special attention given sentinel sites??
Population-based Coverage Estimation
• Should be easily included in periodic national surveys (DHS, MICS, Food/Agricultural Surveys, Employment Surveys)
• Can be done using classic immunization (EPI) cluster survey method
Cluster Survey Coverage Protocol
• Developed in response to need for simple immunization coverage figure
• Addresses sampling issues to insure representativeness
• Based on a random selection of households from weighted selection of villages or other administrative units
Survey Coverage Protocol Describes:
• Selection of the geographic area or other administrative unit that the population sampled will represent (usually a district or region)
• Selection of areas or sub-units from which to select households
• Selection of households within sub-units• Collecting data from individuals
Coverage Survey
• Provides a statistically valid estimate of the proportion of households with iodized salt present, and/or stating use of iodized salt
• Provides an opportunity to test salt at the household level in a representative sample of households
• A sample size of 900 is adequate regardless of total population sampled
• Is usually accurate to within + or – 10% of the estimate
Questions raised :
• Coverage surveysIs there bias in household selection?
Is the salt tested the salt usually used?
Does the geographic area sampled adequately reflect the national population?
?
Interpretation of Low Coverage:
Does it reflect poor or inconsistent production level quality assurance?
Does it reflect the specifics of the geographic area selected?
Does it reflect consumer concerns about iodized salt?
?Availability / Supply
Issues
Technical Sampling
Issues
Demand Issues
Actions To Be Taken
Review total tonnage of iodized salt imported: Is it adequate to meet needs?
Increase external monitoring and enforcement (monitoring at import sites)
Investigate coverage further
Review educational activities: Are IEC efforts effective?
Addresses supply issue
Ensures adequate quality entering the
country
Addresses demand issues
Resolves sampling or geographic
representation concerns
Example of Population Proportionate Sampling
sub-unit (village, ward, ..)
Population Cumulative Population
Areas selected
Random start plus sampling
interval
Sampling interval calculations
1 480 480 2 555 1035 1 718 3 657 1692 4 489 2181 1 1976 5 367 2548
Total population=37741 Total number of areas=30 Sampling interval = 1258
(37741/30)
6 456 3004 7 1299 4303 1 3234 8 345 4648 1 4492 9 333 4981 10 777 5758 1 5750
Random start = random number between 1 and 1258 For this example = 718
11 888 6646 12 675 7321 1 7008 13 324 7645 14 865 8510 1 8266 15 567 9077 16 756 9833 1 9524 17 1234 11067 1 10782 18 3465 14532 2 12040
13298 19 567 15099 1 14556 20 878 15977 1 15814 21 898 16875 22 909 17784 1 17072 23 345 18129 24 345 18474 1 18330 25 556 19030 26 675 19705 1 19588 27 564 20269 28 867 21136 1 20846 29 933 22069 30 967 23036 1 22104 31 876 23912 1 23362 32 347 24259 33 879 25138 1 24620 34 1266 26404 1 25878