Momentum6 24 Spelling

20
The Effect of The Effect of Different “Highway Different “Highway Barrier” Materials on Barrier” Materials on Force and Time of Force and Time of Impact in a Impact in a Simulated Car Crash Simulated Car Crash Danilo, Louis, and Bree Danilo, Louis, and Bree PHYS 399 PHYS 399 Group 2 Group 2

Transcript of Momentum6 24 Spelling

Page 1: Momentum6 24 Spelling

The Effect of The Effect of Different “Highway Different “Highway

Barrier” Materials on Barrier” Materials on Force and Time of Force and Time of

Impact in a Impact in a Simulated Car CrashSimulated Car Crash

Danilo, Louis, and BreeDanilo, Louis, and BreePHYS 399PHYS 399Group 2Group 2

Page 2: Momentum6 24 Spelling

BackgroundBackground• Demonstrates the first law of momentum• In a collision, an object experiences a

force for a specific amount of time which results in a change in momentum

• Tested different materials to simulate which one will be effective to save lives during collision– soft sponge, foam, paper and plastic bubbles

Page 3: Momentum6 24 Spelling

• By increasing the time of impact, we reduce the immediate force of the impact for the occupants of the car while maintaining a consistent momentum

• Therefore we want to find the most effective material to meet this need

PurposePurpose

Page 4: Momentum6 24 Spelling

HypothesisHypothesis• Research Question: Which “highway

barrier” material will best increase the time of impact in a simulated car crash?

• If various “highway barrier” materials are tested in a simulated car crash, then a hollow inelastic material will increase the time of impact the most because it is collapsible unlike solid materials and is inelastic unlike plastic/rubber materials.

Page 5: Momentum6 24 Spelling

Lab Set-Up

•The ramp should be set at some constant angle (we used about 5°) and a constant start distance of 50 cm

•This will provide a constant velocity

Page 6: Momentum6 24 Spelling

The Go! Motion is set-up at the top of The Go! Motion is set-up at the top of the ramp w/the Force Sensor mounted the ramp w/the Force Sensor mounted

at the base.at the base.

Page 7: Momentum6 24 Spelling

•Be sure to use the standard channel ports for the LabQuest Interface

•We used a single device taking 100 samples/s to do both readings to ensure that both sensors would be time synced

•The Vernier cart was mounted with an accelerometer to increase the height and weight (7N) of the car

Page 8: Momentum6 24 Spelling

Experimental Method:

•Mount test materials to the force sensor and re-calculate the 50 cm distance to ensure constant velocity before impact

Test materials used

Page 9: Momentum6 24 Spelling

Example Data Example Data Impulse=change in momentumImpulse=change in momentum

Final values

Time(s) Force(N) Velocity(m/s) F(∆t)=m(∆v)

delta(∆)=final-initial value

We must average the Force over the duration of impact.

Using above formula we see that

6.06N(0.11s)=0.714kg(0.95m/s)

0.6667 N*s=0.6783 kg*m/s

0.67 N*s=0.68 kg*m/s

Seems to indicate consistent data across two sensors

Initial values

Page 10: Momentum6 24 Spelling

Graph of Force and Time Graph of Force and Time relationrelation

Force during impact and Time of impact vs material

0.00

5.0010.00

15.0020.00

25.00

Control Styrofoam BubbleWrap

Foam Paperball

Fo

rce

(N)

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

Tim

e (s

)

Force Time

Page 11: Momentum6 24 Spelling

Data AnalysisData Analysis• The data we collected shows that the

Origami Ball was most effective in increasing the time of impact, thereby reducing the force of impact.

• The control and Styrofoam material was least effective in increasing the time of impact.

Page 12: Momentum6 24 Spelling

ConclusionConclusionImpact Duration vs Impact Force

ControlStyrofoam

Bubblewrap

Foam

Paperball

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16

Duration of impact (s)

Fo

rce o

f im

pact

(N)

Page 13: Momentum6 24 Spelling

Hypothesis supported?Hypothesis supported?• Yes, our hypothesis was supported

by the data that the hollow, collapsible, inelastic material was most effective in increasing the time of impact and reducing the immediate force of impact.

Page 14: Momentum6 24 Spelling

LimitationsLimitations• Due to digital sensitivity of the

sensors, events may occur between readings

• Sensitivity of sensors to sound, may cause discrepancy of data

• Human error for distance and start time

• Price of materials and the equipments

Page 15: Momentum6 24 Spelling

ImprovementsImprovements• Trigger device to prompt readings

from sensors• Consistency in size of test materials• Limitation on mass of test material• Use of the accelerometer instead of

Go! Motion sensor

Page 16: Momentum6 24 Spelling

ApplicationsApplications• Crumple zones extend the collision,

reducing force on passengers

Page 17: Momentum6 24 Spelling

Air bags inflate on contact absorbing impact Air bags inflate on contact absorbing impact Holes let air escape so collision takes even longer Holes let air escape so collision takes even longer

Page 18: Momentum6 24 Spelling

• Highway barriers that bend in sections to extend collisions

Page 19: Momentum6 24 Spelling

ExtensionExtension• Testing the ideal thickness of one

test material to increase the time of impact

• Testing airbag material rather than highway barrier

• Testing crumple zone of the car (having the material attached in front of the car)

Page 20: Momentum6 24 Spelling

Image CreditsImage Credits

• Slide 16 - http://image.motortrend.com/f/auto-news/volvo-wants-to-make-its-cars-injury-proof-by-2020/9805935+w562+cr1+re0+ar1/volvo-crash-test.jpg

• Slide 17 - http://media.canada.com/b17a5268-e809-4db2-a84b-06fc4c00d03e/m1x00181_crashtestdummy.jpg

• Slide 18 - http://www.eplcompositesolutions.co.uk/composite/crashBarriers.asp