Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

download Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

of 70

Transcript of Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    1/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    2/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    3/70

    Strategies for Improved Performance of Moment

    Connections:

    WELDING

    Required minimum toughness for weld metal:

    Required CVN forall welds in SFRS:20 ft.-lbs at 00 F

    Required CVN forDemand Criticalwelds:40 ft.-lbs at 700 F

    ANSI/AISC 341-10 Section A3.4

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    4/70

    WELDING

    Improved practices for backing bars and weld tabs

    Typical improved practice:

    Remove bottom flange backing bar

    Seal weld top flange backing bar

    Remove weld tabs at top and bottom flange welds

    Greater emphasis on quality and quality control (AISCSeismic Provisions Chapter J)

    Strategies for Improved Performance of Moment

    Connections:

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    5/70

    Typical Pre-Northridge

    Bottom Flange Weld

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    6/70

    Improved POST-Northridge Bottom Flange Weld

    Weld tabs andrunoff regions

    removed; ground

    smooth

    Back-up bar removed; root visually

    inspected, defects removed; smallreinforcing fillet weld placed at

    bottom of groove weld

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    7/70

    Typical Pre-Northridge

    Top Flange Weld

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    8/70

    Improved POST-

    Northridge Top

    Flange Weld

    Weld tabs and

    runoff regions

    removed;

    ground

    smooth

    Back-up bar left in place; smallfillet weld placed between bar

    and column face

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    9/70

    Strategies for Improved Performance of Moment

    Connections:Materials (Structural Steel)

    Introduction of expected yield stress into designcodes

    Fy = minimum specified yield strength

    Ry = 1.5 for ASTM A36 (hot-rolled shapes and bars)= 1.1 for A572 Gr. 50 and A992

    Expected Yield Stress = Ry Fy

    ANSI/AISC 341-10 Table A3.1

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    10/70

    Strategies for Improved Performance of Moment

    Connections:

    Materials (Structural Steel)

    Introduction of ASTM A992 steel for wide flangeshapes

    ASTM A992

    Minimum Fy = 50 ksi

    Maximum Fy = 65 ksi

    Minimum Fu = 65 ksi

    Maximum Fy / Fu = 0.85

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    11/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    12/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    13/70

    Pre-Northridge

    Improved

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    14/70

    Strategies for Improved Performance of Moment

    Connections:

    Connection Design

    Development of Improved Connection Designsand Design Procedures

    Reinforced Connections

    Proprietary Connections

    Reduced Beam Section (Dogbone)Connections

    Other SAC Investigated Connections

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    15/70

    Reinforced Connection

    Cover-Plated

    Connection

    Cover plates fillet welded

    to beam flanges, thencombinedbeam flange

    and cover plate groove

    welded to face of column

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    16/70

    Cover-Plated Connection

    Improvedperformance in

    general, but

    costly to

    construct

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    17/70

    Cover-Plated Connection About 2/3 of specimensdeveloped total plasticrotation of 0.03 radwithout brittle fracture

    (strong panel zone) Others, panel zone

    yielding dominatedresponse

    2 specimens with boltedwebs failed in brittlemanner (< 0.02 radplastic rotation)

    Brittle fracture inspecimen for whichwelding procedure notenforced

    Failure in specimen withLONG cover plate

    Not sufficiently

    reliable?

    Susceptible to sameproblems of weld

    quality and through-

    thickness behavior of

    column flange?

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    18/70

    Reinforced Connection

    Flange Rib

    Connection

    Like cover-plated connection,

    connection is stronger than

    beam, plastic hinge formation

    forced away from face of

    column

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    19/70

    Flange RibConnection

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    20/70

    Lee, C.H. et al. (2005) Experimental Study of Cyclic Seismic Behavior of

    Steel Moment Connections Reinforced with Ribs, Journal of Structural

    Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 1, January 1, 2005

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    21/70

    Reinforced Connection

    Haunched

    Connection

    May be at bottom flange or

    both top and bottom flanges

    Initially tested as four pre-Northridge connections

    repaired with bottom

    triangular T-shaped haunches

    H h d C ti

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    22/70

    Haunched Connections

    Generally good

    performance inlaboratory

    Costly to construct

    Not included asprequalified for newbuildings in FEMA350

    Recommended SeismicDesign Criteria for NewSteel Moment-FrameBuildings(2000) More on FEMA 350 later

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    23/70

    Reduced Beam

    Section (RBS)

    Also called Dogbone

    connection; less costly, simplerthan reinforced connections

    Forces hinge formation to

    occur within reduced section

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    24/70

    RBS has become one of the most common moment

    connection details used in current practice.

    (More details later )

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    25/70

    Proprietary Connection

    Side Plate

    Connection

    Beam flanges NOT directly

    welded to column flanges;

    forces transferred through sideplates.

    http://www.sideplate.com/

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    26/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    27/70

    Connections Investigated Through

    SAC-FEMA Research Program

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    28/70

    Reduced Beam

    Section (RBS)

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    29/70

    WeldedUnreinforced

    Flange - Bolted

    Web (WUF-B)

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    30/70

    Welded

    Unreinforced

    Flange - Welded

    Web (WUF-W)

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    31/70

    Free Flange

    Connection

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    32/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    33/70

    Bolted Unstiffened

    End Plate

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    34/70

    Bolted Stiffened

    End Plate

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    35/70

    Bolted Flange

    Plate

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    36/70

    Double Split Tee

    Typically treated

    as a partially-

    restrainedconnection

    (effects of

    connection

    flexibility must

    be included inoverall frame

    analysis).

    R lt f SAC FEMA R h P

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    37/70

    Results of SAC-FEMA Research Program

    Recommended Seismic Design Criteria

    for Steel Moment Frames FEMA 350Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-

    Frame Buildings

    FEMA 351Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for

    Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings

    FEMA 352Recommended Postearthquake Evaluation and Repair Criteria

    for Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings

    FEMA 353Recommended Specifications and Quality Assurance

    Guidelines for Steel Moment-Frame Construction for Seismic

    Applications

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    38/70

    FEMA 350

    Nine momentconnection details just

    shownprequalifiedconnections

    Recommended designprocedures, limits of

    usage (e.g., OMF only,W36 beams andshallower, flange

    thickness limits, webconnection, etc.)

    Not a standard; butstill a valuable

    reference

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    39/70

    New standardReplaced FEMA 350

    Prequalifiedrigorousprogram of testing, analytical

    evaluation and review by theconnection prequalificationreview panel (CPRP).

    Reduced Beam Section(RBS)

    Bolted Stiffened andUnstiffened Extended EndPlate

    ANSI/AISC 358-05

    Connection Prequalification

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    40/70

    Connection Prequalification

    AISC Connection Prequalification

    Review Panel ANSI/AISC 341-10 Chapter K

    Connections shall be prequalified based on

    test data satisfying Section K1.3, supportedby analytical studies and design models.The combined body of evidence must besufficient to assure that the connection can

    supply the required story drift angle forSMF and IMF systems . on a consistentand reliable basis within the specified limitsof prequalification.

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    41/70

    ANSI/AISC 358-10

    Proprietary Connections

    Reduced Beam Section (RBS)

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    42/70

    Reduced Beam Section (RBS)

    Bolted Unstiffened Extended End Plate (BUEEP)

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    43/70

    Bolted Unstiffened Extended End Plate (BUEEP)

    Bolted Stiffened Extended End Plate (BSEEP)

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    44/70

    Welded Unreinforced Flange Welded

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    45/70

    Welded Unreinforced FlangeWelded

    Web (WUF-W)

    Kaiser Bolted Bracket (KBB)

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    46/70

    Kaiser Bolted Bracket (KBB)

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    47/70

    Steel Connections: Proprietary or Public Domain? by P. Cordova & R.

    Hamburger, Modern Steel Construction, October 2011

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    48/70

    Experimental Evaluation of Kaiser

    Bolted Bracket Steel Moment-Resisting Connections

    Scott M. Adan and William Gibb

    AISC Engineering Journal 2009

    http://www.steelcastconnections.com/

    ConXtech ConXL moment connection

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    49/70

    ConXtech ConXL moment connection

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    50/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    51/70

    http://dcm-designs.com/steel-prefabricated-moment-frame/

    This innovative

    connection system

    enables beams to besimply lowered and locked

    onto square columns in

    the field, resulting in a

    dimensionally accuratestructural chassis. The

    system is often referred to

    as a full-scale erector set.

    http://www.conxtech.com

    /conx-system/

    VIDEO CLIP

    Connections in process of prequalification

    http://www.conxtech.com/conx-videos/introduction-to-conxtech/http://www.conxtech.com/conx-videos/introduction-to-conxtech/
  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    52/70

    Connections in process of prequalification

    Double Tee

    Simpson Strong Frame SENSE TSC

    Side Plate

    SOM Pin Fuse Joint

    Double Tee

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    53/70

    Double Tee

    http://www.aisc.org/uploadedcontent/2012NASCCSessions/N11/

    Simpson Strong Frame (Yield Link)

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    54/70

    Simpson Strong Frame (Yield Link)

    http://www.aisc.org/uploadedcontent/2012NASCCSessions/N11/

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    55/70

    SidePlate

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    56/70

    SidePlate

    http://www.aisc.org/uploadedcontent/2012NASCCSessions/N11/

    SOM Pin Fuse Joint

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    57/70

    SOM Pin Fuse Joint

    Steel Connections: Proprietary or Public Domain? by P. Cordova & R.

    Hamburger, Modern Steel Construction, October 2011

    SOM Pin Fuse Joint

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    58/70

    SOM Pin Fuse Joint

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    59/70

    http://www.som.com/content.cfm/pin_fuse_joint

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    60/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    61/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    62/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    63/70

    A number of

    experiments havebeen conducted

    with specimens

    with weak panel

    zones

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    64/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    65/70

    Very weak panel

    zone; localizedkinks cause

    strain

    concentrations,

    ultimately leadingto fracture in

    vicinity of beam

    flange groove

    welds.

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    66/70

    Same specimen

    as previous slide.

    Connection failed

    at moment well

    below Mp

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    67/70

    "kink" at corners

    of panel zone

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    68/70

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    69/70

    -1200

    -800

    -400

    0

    400

    800

    1200

    -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08

    Panel Zone g (rad)

    PanelZoneShe

    arForce(kips)

    Composite RBS Specimen with

    Weak Panel Zone

    g

    Observations on Panel Zone Behavior

  • 7/27/2019 Moment Resisting Frames - Part2

    70/70

    Very high ductility is possible.

    Localized deformations (kinking) at cornersof panel zone may increase likelihood offracture in vicinity of beam flange groovewelds.

    Current AISC Seismic Provisions permitslimited yielding in panel zone (SpecificationJ10.6 for available strength)

    Further research needed to better defineacceptable level of panel zone yielding