molecular vs. physiological mode of action for sub-lethal effects

21
molecular vs. physiological mode of action for sub-lethal effects Tjalling Jager, Bas Kooijman Olga Alda Álvarez, Jan Kammenga

description

molecular vs. physiological mode of action for sub-lethal effects. Tjalling Jager, Bas Kooijman Olga Alda Álvarez, Jan Kammenga. toxicant. target site. ‘Classic’ mode of action …. Based on molecular target, e.g.: narcosis (cell membranes) uncoupling (mitochondria) AChE inhibition. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of molecular vs. physiological mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Page 1: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

molecular vs. physiological mode of action

for sub-lethal effects

Tjalling Jager, Bas Kooijman

Olga Alda Álvarez, Jan Kammenga

Page 2: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

‘Classic’ mode of action …

Based on molecular target, e.g.:• narcosis (cell membranes)• uncoupling (mitochondria)• AChE inhibition

target sitetoxicant

Questions Predictive for life-cycle and population? To what extent species-specific?

Questions Predictive for life-cycle and population? To what extent species-specific?

Popular for predicting acute LC50

Page 3: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

sub-lethal QSARs?

ECx

log descriptor

log

co

nce

ntr

atio

n

Page 4: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Cl

Cl

Cl Cl

Cl

What is sub-lethal ‘toxicity’?

ECx is a poor measure of ‘the toxicity’ Species respond differently to PeCB

ECx is a poor measure of ‘the toxicity’ Species respond differently to PeCB

EC

10

time time

body sizebody size

reproduction reproduction

A. nanus

C. elegans

Cl

Cl

Cl Cl

Cl

Page 5: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

What causes effects?

effect onlife cycle/population

ENERGYBUDGET

toxicodynamicstoxicokinetics

rest of the organismtarget sitetoxicant

molecular MoA

physiological MoA

Page 6: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Energy budgets

Page 7: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Energy budgets

growth

reproduction

assimilation

Each phys. MoA has

specific effects on life cycle

Each phys. MoA has

specific effects on life cycle

maintenance

Page 8: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Population consequences

Page 9: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Population consequences

Page 10: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Population consequences

growth

reproduction

maintenance

assimilation

Each phys. MoA has

specific effects for populations

Each phys. MoA has

specific effects for populations

Page 11: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Experiments nematodes

Species• Caenorhabditis elegans and Acrobeloides nanus

Chemicals• cadmium, pentachlorobenzene and carbendazim

Exposure• in agar

Endpoints• survival, body size, reproduction over full life cycle• analysed with extended DEBtox

Studies published as: Alda Álvarez et al., 2005 (Func. Ecol.), 2006 (ES&T), 2006 (ET&C)

Page 12: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

reproduction

DEB model

Biology-based (DEBtox)

targetparameter

toxicokinetics

growthmaintenance

assimilation

Life-cycle effectsKooijman & Bedaux, 1996 (Wat. Res.)

Page 13: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

PeCB in A. nanus

0 5 10 15 20 25 3015

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

time (days)

bo

dy

len

gth

020406080

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

time (days)

cum

ula

tive

off

sp

rin

g

020406080

Effects on assimilation

A. nanus

Page 14: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

PeCB in C. elegans

0 2 4 6 8 10 120

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

time (days)

bo

dy

len

gth

0507090110130

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

time (days)

cum

ula

tive

off

sp

rin

g

0507090110130

Costs for growth and reproduction

C. elegans

Page 15: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Physiological MoA nematodes

C. elegans A. nanus

PeCB(narcotic)

Cadmium(heavy metal)

Carbendazim(inhibits mitosis)

Page 16: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Physiological MoA nematodes

C. elegans A. nanus

PeCB(narcotic)

costs for growth and reproduction

assimilation

Cadmium(heavy metal)

Carbendazim(inhibits mitosis)

Page 17: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Physiological MoA nematodes

C. elegans A. nanus

PeCB(narcotic)

costs for growth and reproduction

assimilation

Cadmium(heavy metal)

assimilation costs for growth

(+ ageing)

Carbendazim(inhibits mitosis)

Page 18: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Physiological MoA nematodes

C. elegans A. nanus

PeCB(narcotic)

costs for growth and reproduction

assimilation

Cadmium(heavy metal)

assimilation costs for growth

(+ ageing)

Carbendazim(inhibits mitosis)

assimilation assimilation

(- ageing)

Page 19: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Conclusions

‘Molecular’ MoA is important, but …• not enough to predict effects life cycle/population• does not consider toxicodynamics

‘Physiological’ MoA gives extra information• includes toxicodynamics• direct link to population effects

Clearly, species differ in phys. MoA …

Page 20: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

Species differences?

Species A Species B

target sitetoxicanttarget sitetoxicant

maintenance

reproduction

maintenance

reproduction

Page 21: molecular  vs.  physiological  mode of action for sub-lethal effects

target sitetoxicant phys. process

effect onlife cycle/population

maintenance

reproduction

Outlook

?

Why useful? number of chemicals and species is very large … but number of target sites and processes is limited!

www.bio.vu.nl/thbwww.bio.vu.nl/thb

Once we know the normal biological processes, all external stressors are merely perturbations of these processes (Yang et al., 2004)

Once we know the normal biological processes, all external stressors are merely perturbations of these processes (Yang et al., 2004)