Molecular dynamics for the charging behavior of nanostructured … · 2014-09-05 · Molecular...
Transcript of Molecular dynamics for the charging behavior of nanostructured … · 2014-09-05 · Molecular...
Nano Res
1
Molecular dynamics for the charging behavior of
nanostructured electric double layer capacitors
containing room temperature ionic liquids
Xian Kong1,2, Diannan Lu2(), Zheng Liu2(), and Jianzhong Wu1()
Nano Res., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1007/s12274-014-0574-0
http://www.thenanoresearch.com on September 1, 2014
© Tsinghua University Press 2014
Just Accepted
This is a “Just Accepted” manuscript, which has been examined by the peer-review process and has been
accepted for publication. A “Just Accepted” manuscript is published online shortly after its acceptance,
which is prior to technical editing and formatting and author proofing. Tsinghua University Press (TUP)
provides “Just Accepted” as an optional and free service which allows authors to make their results available
to the research community as soon as possible after acceptance. After a manuscript has been technically
edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP
article. Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or
graphics which may affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. In no event
shall TUP be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of any information contained
in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts. To cite this manuscript please use its Digital Object Identifier (DOI®),
which is identical for all formats of publication.
Nano Research
DOI 10.1007/s12274-014-0574-0
Template for Preparation of Manuscripts for Nano Research
TABLE OF CONTENTS (TOC)
Authors are required to submit a graphic entry for the Table of Contents (TOC) in conjunction with the manuscript title. This graphic
should capture the readers’ attention and give readers a visual impression of the essence of the paper. Labels, formulae, or numbers
within the graphic must be legible at publication size. Tables or spectra are not acceptable. Color graphics are highly encouraged. The
resolution of the figure should be at least 600 dpi. The size should be at least 50 mm × 80 mm with a rectangular shape (ideally, the ratio
of height to width should be less than 1 and larger than 5/8). One to two sentences should be written below the figure to summarize the
paper. To create the TOC, please insert your image in the template box below. Fonts, size, and spaces should not be changed.
Molecular dynamics for the charging behavior of
nanostructured electric double layer capacitors
containing room temperature ionic liquids
Xian Kong1,2, Diannan Lu2*, Zheng Liu2*, and
Jianzhong Wu1*
1 University of California, Riverside, USA
2 Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Strong electrostatic correlations in a room temperature ionic
liquid are responsible for the oscillatory variation of the surface
charge density during the constant-potential charging of electric
double layer capacitors. The legends denote different
separations between two parallel electrodes.
Provide the authors’ website if possible.
Diannan Lu, http://www.chemeng.tsinghua.edu.cn/scholars/ludn/index.htm
Zheng Liu, http://www.chemeng.tsinghua.edu.cn/scholars/liuzheng/liuzheng_e.htm
Jianzhong Wu, http://www.cee.ucr.edu/jwu/index.html
0 5 10 150.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Q (
e/n
m2)
t (ps)
2.1 nm
2.3 nm
2.8 nm
3.1 nm
1.0 nm
1.4 nm
1.7 nm
Molecular dynamics for the charging behavior of
nanostructured electric double layer capacitors
containing room temperature ionic liquids
Xian Kong1,2, Diannan Lu2(), Zheng Liu2(), and Jianzhong Wu1()
Received: day month year
Revised: day month year
Accepted: day month year
(automatically inserted by the
publisher)
© Tsinghua University Press and
Springer-Verlag Berlin
Heidelberg 2014
KEYWORDS
electric double layer,
room temperature ionic
liquids,
nanostructured capacitor,
charging dynamics
ABSTRACT
The charging kinetics of electric double layers (EDLs) is closely related to the
performance of a wide variety of nanostructured devices including
supercapacitors, electro-actuators, and electrolyte-gated transistors. While room
temperature ionic liquids (RTIL) are often used as the charge carrier in these
new applications, the theoretical analyses are mostly hinged on conventional
electrokinetic theories suitable for macroscopic electrochemical phenomena in
aqueous solutions. In this work, we study the charging behavior of RTIL-EDLs
using a coarse-grained molecular model and constant-potential molecular
dynamics (MD) simulations. In stark contrast to the predictions of conventional
theories, the MD results show oscillatory variations of ionic distributions and
electrochemical properties in response to the separation between electrodes.
The rate of EDL charging exhibits non-monotonic behavior revealing strong
electrostatic correlations in RTIL under confinement.
1 Introduction
Electric double layer capacitors (EDLC), also
known as supercapacitors, have received a great
deal of attention in recent years for their
outstanding performance as an efficient energy
storage device with large power density, high
capacitance, and long lasting cycle life[1-4]. Recent
developments in EDLC research have greatly
benefitted from rapid advances in the fabrication of
nanostructured electrodes with ultra-high specific
surface area and microporous dimension
Nano Research
DOI (automatically inserted by the publisher)
Address correspondence to [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Research Article Please choose one
| www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp
2 Nano Res.
comparable to the ionic size[5-8]. The EDLC
performance, especially the energy density and
thermal stability, can be further enhanced by the
adoption of room-temperature ionic liquids (RTIL)
or organic electrolytes as the charge carrier [9-12].
The non-aqueous electrolytes allow for EDLC
operation at a wider voltage window, thereby
providing higher energy density.
Recent experimental investigations of EDLC have
inspired considerable theoretical interests in
examining the interfacial structure and the
electrokinetic behavior of EDLs consisting of ionic
liquids [13, 14]. The theoretical and simulation
studies help to elucidate novel electrochemical
phenomena such as the microscopic mechanisms
responsible for the drastic increase of capacitance in
nanoporous electrodes and predict an oscillatory
behavior in response to the changes in the pore
size[15-18]. In stark contrast to numerous reports
on the equilibrium properties of RTIL-EDLs,
relatively little investigations have been devoted to
understanding the dynamics and transport
behavior of RTIL in confined geometry, especially
on their connections with the unique microscopic
details of EDLs. While the electrokinetics in RTIL
systems has been speculated to be distinctively
different from that corresponding to aqueous
electrolyte solutions, theoretical interpretation of
the voltammetry data from experiments are mostly
hinged on conventional equivalent-circuit (EC)
models or microscopic electrokinetic theories
established for systems containing ions in dilute
aqueous solutions[19-22]. Because the conventional
methods entail drastic approximations suitable only
for macroscopic electrochemical phenomena, their
applicability to RTIL-EDLs is questionable and has
to be validated from a microscopic perspective[23,
24]. Towards that end, Péan et al studied the
charging dynamics of supercapacitors based on
constant-voltage molecular dynamics (MD)
simulations for a realistic model of an ionic liquid
and nanoporous carbon[25]. It was found that ion
transport in nanoporous materials is not much
affected by the confinement and that the charging
kinetics can be nicely fitted with an EC model.
However, simulation on simpler models of ionic
liquids and porous electrodes indicates that ion
diffusion in ionophilic nanopores could be an order
of magnitude faster than that in the bulk[26]. In
addition, it was found that the EDL charging in
RTIL typically follows a diffusive process with
“overfilling” at short time and “defiling” at the late
stage. Such charging behavior cannot be faithfully
described with conventional EC models[26].
In this work, we investigate the charging kinetics
of EDLC using MD simulation for a realistic model
of RTIL but with a deliberately simplified
configuration for the electrodes. While the model
system is not intended to mimic any experimental
setup for EDLCs, it allows for fast equilibrium and
better control of the temperature without
comprising the essential features of EDL charging.
We show that the surface layering of counterions
and coions near the electrodes have profound
influences on the kinetics of EDL charging in ionic
liquids. Unlike the predictions of conventional
electrokinetic models, RTIL-EDL charging is highly
sensitive to the pore size and may lead to a
non-monotonic variation of the surface charge
density.
2 Molecular Model and Methods
Consider a model electrochemical cell consisting
of two metal electrodes and an ionic liquid. As
shown schematically in Figure 1, the ionic liquid is
described in terms of a coarse-grained model where
each cation is represented by 3 partially charged,
spherical particles, and each anion is one spherical
particle with a charge of -0.78e. The coarse-grained
model has been used in a number of earlier
simulation studies of ionic liquids (e.g.,[25, 27, 28]).
Whereas the molecular parameters had been fitted
with various static and dynamic properties of a
specific ionic liquid, namely 1-butyl-3-methyl-
www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research
3 Nano Res.
imidazolium exafluorophosphate (BMI-PF6) in the
bulk, the coarse-grained model was intended to be
generic, representing typical RTILs used in
experiments[28].
For computing electrostatic interactions and
confinement effects on mobile ions, the charged
surface is modeled as a single layer of
Lennard-Jones (LJ) particles arranged in a
configuration identical to that of carbon atoms in a
perfect graphite sheet[29]. For convenience, the size
and energy parameters of the LJ particles are
selected to be identical to those corresponding to
individual carbon atoms, i.e., σ=0.337 nm and ε=0.23
kJ/mol, respectively.
Figure 1 A snapshot of the ionic distributions in the model
electrochemical cell from MD simulation. The electrode atoms
are colored gray, each cation (red) consists of 3 coarse-grained
beads of different sizes and partial charges, and each green
sphere represents an anion with a charge of -0.78e. The
electrode polarizability is accounted for by the image charges of
the mobile ions shown in semitransparent colors.
We assume that each electrode is made of a
perfect metal, i.e., the electrode charges can be
accumulated only at the interface and the dielectric
constant in the bulk electrode is infinite. To account
for the effects of electrode polarizability, we adopt
the image charge method proposed by Petersen et al
[30]. Briefly, the polarization of each electrode is
described by the primary image charges of the
mobile ions with higher-order terms approximated
by a uniformly charged surface. The charge of each
particle at the electrode surface is allowed to
fluctuate such that the difference between the
electrical potentials of the electrodes, i.e., the voltage
of the electrochemical cell, is kept as a constant.
Because the image charge method avoids iterative
minimization of the total energy at each simulation
step, its computational efficiency is superior to an
alternative protocol proposed by Reed et al., which
was based on an earlier simulation method
developed by Siepmann and Sprik[31, 32].
We implemented MD simulations for the above
model ionic system using Gromacs 4.6.5 simulation
package[33]. The x-y directions of the simulation
box were fixed at 3.118nm×3.600nm with periodic
boundary conditions; the z-direction is confined
between two parallel electrodes, each containing 96
LJ particles to represent the surface atoms. At a
given separation between the symmetric planes of
the surface atoms, the simulation cell is filled with
an equal number of cations and anions such that the
average density of the confined ionic liquid is the
same as that of the bulk electrolyte. An equal
number of image charges are placed on each side
out of the electrode for both cations and anions.
Throughout this work, all MD simulations were
conducted in the NVT ensemble. For all cases, the
temperature was kept at 400 K using the
Nose-Hoover thermostat with 1.0 ps coupling
coefficient[34, 35]. The integration step was fixed at
5 fs. The slab particle mesh Ewald (PME) method[36,
37] was used to compute electrostatic interactions. A
slab of vacuum was left on each side of the
simulation box to ensure the accuracy of
electrostatic force calculation. A cutoff distance of
1.2 nm was applied to both electrostatic interactions
in the real space and non-electrostatic interactions.
During each step of MD simulation, we propagate
only the positions of the ionic liquid particles. The
positions of primary image charges at each
electrode are updated to make sure that a primary
image charge and its real particles form mirror
symmetry with the corresponding electrode as the
symmetry plane.
For each atomic configuration of the ionic liquid,
we can calculate the surface charge of the electrode
| www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp
4 Nano Res.
analytically[30],
0
1
ni i
E E
i
q dn q q
D
(1)
where nE is the number of carbon atoms from the
electrode, qE is the charge of each electrode atom, n
is the total number of ionic liquid atoms between
the two parallel electrodes, qi is the charge for atom
i, di is the distance of atom i to the left electrode, D is
the separation between the two parallel electrodes,
and 0q is the total charge for the same electrode
without the ionic liquid. It can be shown that, in the
absence of ionic liquid,
q
0= DV
0Ae
0/ D (2)
where DV
0 is the difference in electrical potential
between the two electrodes, e
0is the vacuum
electrical permittivity, and A is the cross-section
area of the electrodes. For each ionic configuration,
the charge density for each electrode is calculated
from /E EQ n q A .
For simulating the equilibrium properties of
EDLs, we carried MD production runs with a target
electric potential drop after the system was subject
to energy minimization and 1 ns equilibration with
no electrical potential bias to the electrodes. Table 1
lists all simulation setups used in this work. The
charging kinetics of the model electrochemical cell
was studied by conducting 500 parallel
constant-potential simulations. For each MD
trajectory, the starting configuration was generated
after energy minimization and 50 ns equilibration
with no electrical potential bias to the electrodes. At
t = 0 , the applied voltage was subject to a sudden
increase from 0 to 1 V. All dynamic properties
reported in this work were obtained by averaging
over 500 MD trajectories.
Table 1 Simulation parameters for systems with different
distances between parallel electrodes (D)
D (nm)
# of
atoms in
electrode
# of
IL pairs
# of
image
IL pairs
# of
total
atoms
1.0 96 13 26 348
1.1 96 16 32 384
1.2 96 19 38 420
1.3 96 21 42 444
1.4 96 24 48 480
1.5 96 27 54 516
1.6 96 30 60 552
1.7 96 32 64 576
1.8 96 35 70 612
1.9 96 38 76 648
2.0 96 41 82 684
2.1 96 43 86 708
2.2 96 46 92 744
2.3 96 49 98 780
2.4 96 51 102 804
2.5 96 54 108 840
2.6 96 57 114 876
2.7 96 60 120 912
2.8 96 62 124 936
2.9 96 65 130 972
3.0 96 68 136 1008
3.1 96 71 142 1044
3.2 96 73 146 1068
3.3 96 76 152 1104
3.4 96 79 158 1140
3.5 96 82 164 1176
3.6 96 84 168 1200
3.7 96 87 174 1236
3.8 96 90 180 1272
3.9 96 93 186 1308
4.0 96 95 190 1332
4.1 96 98 196 1368
4.2 96 101 202 1404
4.3 96 103 206 1428
4.4 96 106 212 1464
4.5 96 109 218 1500
4.6 96 112 224 1536
4.7 96 114 228 1560
4.8 96 117 234 1596
4.9 96 120 240 1632
5.0 96 123 246 1668
3 Results and Discussions
3.1 RTIL-EDL at equilibrium
To ensure that the customized simulation
protocol generates reliable results, we have first
performed MD simulations for the model system at
various constant electrode voltages and also at
www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research
5 Nano Res.
constant surface charge densities. For the latter case,
the simulation can be easily implemented with the
original Gromacs 4.6 simulation package. For
equilibrium systems, the constant potential and
constant charge simulations should lead to the same
results. Figure S1 presents the Q-V curves generated
from the two different methods. The excellent
agreement between these two curves indicates that
the image charge method can be successfully used
to control the electrode electrical potential.
Figure 2 presents the charge density of the
cathode as a function of the separation between the
parallel electrodes for the model electrochemical
cell at equilibrium. Here the applied voltage on the
electrodes was fixed at DV
0= 1.0V . Because of
electrostatic neutrality, the cathode and anode bear
the same total amount of charge but with opposite
signs.
Figure 2 The surface charge density for the model EDLC at
equilibrium versus the separation between the electrodes. Here
the voltage between two the parallel electrodes is fixed at
ΔV0=1.0 V. The symbols are simulation results; the solid line is
for the guide to the eye.
While the equilibrium charge of a macroscopic
capacitor is inversely proportional to the dielectric
thickness, our simulation results indicate that the
capacitor charge of RTIL-EDL exhibits an oscillatory
decay as the separation between the electrodes
increases. The distance between two neighboring
peaks (or valleys) is about 0.7nm, approximately
equal to two times the average ion diameter. Similar
oscillatory behavior has been reported before using
classical density functional theory (DFT)
calculations and all-atom MD simulations for an
ionic liquid confined between two surfaces of the
same charge[15-17]. The amplitude of the oscillation
falls as D increases and remains significant beyond
the maximum distance (5nm) studied in this work.
(a) (b)
Figure 3 (a) The local densities of cations and anions based on
the center of mass; (b) the local charge density and the local
mean electrical potential inside the cell. In both cases, the
separation between electrodes is D=3 nm, the cell voltage is
fixed at ΔV0=1.0 V.
The oscillatory charge variation is closely
affiliated with the layering structures of ionic
liquids within the electrical cell. Qualitatively, the
variation in the surface charge density corroborates
recent investigations on surface forces in ionic
liquid systems[38]. To illustrate, we show in Figure
3 the local densities of cations and anions, and the
local charge density and electrical potential within
the cell when the separation between the parallel
electrodes is fixed at 3D nm. Because of the
differences in ion size and shape, the ionic and
charge distributions are not symmetric as revealed
in recent DFT calculations[15]. Nevertheless, the
layer-by-layer distributions of cations and anions
between the electrodes remain evident. The
thickness of each ionic layer is about 0.7 nm, close
to the average diameter for a pair of cations and
anions. It is worthwhile mentioning that the cation
orientations are distinctively different near positive
and negative electrodes. As shown in Figure 3(a),
the density profile for cations ([BMI+]) exhibits
1 2 3 4 50.14
0.16
0.18
Q (
e/n
m2)
D (nm)
1.0 V
0 1 2 3
0
400
800
1200
Den
sity
(k
g/m
3)
z (nm)
BMI
PF6
0 1 2 3-3.0
-1.5
0.0
1.5
3.0
z (nm)
Ch
arg
e (e
)
-1
0
Po
tential (V
)
| www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp
6 Nano Res.
double peaks near the cathode, while there is only a
single peak near the anode. Approximately, double
and single peaks correspond to the perpendicular
and parallel alignments of the trimeric cations with
the electrode, respectively.
Figure 3b) indicates that the layer-by-layer
distributions of cations and anions are accompanied
by near sinusoidal variations of the local electrical
charge and potential. The phase shift between the
two sinusoidal curves is consistent with the
prediction of the Poisson equation
Ñ2Y(z) = -q(z) / e
0 (3)
where Y(z) and
q(z) = qin
i(z)
i
å stand for the
local electrical potential and charge density,
respectively, and e
0is permittivity in the vacuum.
Figure 4 Distribution of the surface charge density versus the
separation between two neutral electrodes. The color bar shows
the probability of the surface charge at each electrode.
At a given surface potential, the total charge of
the electrode fluctuates with the ionic
configurations due to the electrode polarizability
effect. To calculate the charge fluctuations, we have
conducted a series of MD simulations with the
voltage bias changing from -0.5 to 1.0 V at an
interval of 0.1 V. The weighted histogram method
was used to obtain the surface charge fluctuations.
Figure 4 shows a “free-energy landscape” of the
system according to the distribution of electrode
charges at zero voltage bias. We see that the charge
fluctuation depends on the distance between
electrodes, especially at low D values.
We have calculated the differential capacitor Cd
from the surface charge fluctuations according to an
analytical method proposed by Limmer et al[39].
Briefly, this method relates the differential capacitor
to the fluctuation of the charges on the electrodes,
C
d= b dQ2 (4)
where dQ = Q - Q .
Figure 5 Differential capacitance versus separation at zero
electrode voltage calculated from the fluctuations of the surface
charge density Q. Black circles are simulation points. Red line
is a spline fitting of the simulation data to guide the eye.
Figure 5 presents the differential capacitance at
zero voltage bias versus the separation between the
electrodes. As demonstrated in our previous work
for porous electrodes[15-18], the differential
capacitance oscillates with the separation between
electrodes. The period of oscillation is about 0.7nm,
the same as that for the variation of the electrode
charges. The amplitude of the capacitance
oscillation falls as the separation between the
electrodes increases, although the trend is not as
obvious as that for the variation of the electrode
charges. The oscillatory behavior of the capacitance
again indicates that the separation between
electrodes may have tremendous effects on the
performance of the nanostructured EDLCs.
1 2 3 4 52.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Cd(
F/c
m2)
D (nm)
www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research
7 Nano Res.
3.2 Charging kinetics
We have studied the charging kinetics of the
model electrochemical cell with separation between
electrodes D=1.0nm, 1.4nm, 1.7nm, 2.1nm, 2.3nm,
2.8nm, 3.1nm. These conditions are selected because
they correspond to either the peak or valley of the
charge and capacitance oscillations shown in
Figures 2 and 5, respectively.
Previous research indicated that during the
charging process, the temperature of ILs in the
nanopores would increase due to the Joule heat
effect [26, 40]. We studied the temperature change
in two typical cases with D=2.0 nm and 5.0 nm and
the results are shown in Figure S2. The Joule heat
effect is insignificant in our simulations because the
increase of temperature is proportional to the
squared voltage drop[40] (ΔV2), and we used a
relatively low voltage value, ΔV=1.0 V, at which the
temperature increase rate is only about 0.1K∙ps-1. By
contrast, significant temperature increase was
reported in earlier studies [26, 40].
(a) (b)
Figure 6 (a) Evolution of the cathode charge density after the
electrodes are exerted with a 1.0 V voltage bias. Simulation
results are give for the separation between electrodes fixed at
1.0 nm, 1.4 nm, 1.7 nm, 2.1 nm, 2.3 nm, 2.8 nm and 3.0 nm; (b)
The RC values using equivalent circuit (EC) model. Symbols
are fitted RC values from (a), and the red line is for the guide of
the eye.
As shown in Figure 6 (a), the charging kinetics is
very fast for the model electrochemical cell; the
equilibrium state could be reached within about 500
ps except for the case of D=1.4 nm. Note that in our
simulations, we used a high temperature (about 400
K) to accelerate the dynamics of ionic motions and
thus reducing the simulation cost. For real systems,
the charging may be many times slower due to
much larger system size.
Since the same voltage drop of 1.0 V was used for
all the charging processes studied in this work, the
driving force of the electrical charging, namely the
total electric field across the cell, E=ΔV/D, decreases
with the increasing the cell width. Thus we would
expect a slow charging kinetics with the increase of
separation between the electrodes. However, Figure
6(a) shows that the charging kinetics at D= 1.4 nm
and 2.1 nm is much slower than other cell
configurations; they are even slower than those
with much larger electrode separations (e.g., D=3.1
nm). The nonmonotonic charging behavior is
closely related to the formation of layer-by-layer
structures[41]. For most cases, the charging process
completes within about 200 ps, while for D=2.1 nm,
the charging process lasts more than 400 ps, and the
duration of charging is even longer than 1000 ps for
D=1.4 nm.
For all the cases studied, the variation of the
surface charge density versus time shows a rough
exponential decay as predicted by the equivalent
circuit (EC) model. In the EC model, the total
charge density of a parallel capacitor follows an
exponential decay towards the asymptotic value at
equilibrium
Q(t) = Q
e(1- e-t/RC ) (5)
where Q
e stands for the equilibrium charge
density at the electrode surface, C and R
represent the differential capacitance and the
effective resistance for each EDL, respectively. The
quantity RC provides a characteristic time
reflecting the kinetics of EDL charging/discharging.
The fitted values of RC are plotted in Figure 6(b).
The RC values also show an oscillation behavior
with the increase of D, indicating that the
separation between electrodes not only influences
0 200 400 600 800 1000
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.20
2.1 nm
2.3 nm
2.8 nm
3.1 nm
1.0 nm
1.4 nm
1.7 nm
Q (
e/n
m2)
t (ps)
1 2 3
0
10
20
30
40
RC
(p
s)
D (nm)
| www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp
8 Nano Res.
the equilibrium properties of the capacitors, but
also the charging kinetics of the nanostructured
capacitors.
A careful inspection of the first picoseconds of the
charging process reveals interesting “overfilling”
and “defiling” behavior as identified by earlier
simulations[26]. Figure 7 indicates that, right after
the exertion of the voltage bias to two originally
neutral electrodes, the charge density first increases
rapidly. However, the increase is not always
exponentially as predicted by EC model. At about 1
~2 ps, there will be an oscillatory variation of the
surface charge density, in particular for cases with
small electrode separations (D=1.0 nm, 1.4 nm), the
electrode charge could even decrease, before
increasing again till reaching the equilibrium values.
Recently, the nonmonotonic variation of the surface
charge density during EDL charging has been
examined in detail with the time-dependent density
functional theory (TDDFT) [41].
Figure 7 The initial stage of the charging dynamics for the
model electrochemical system after the application of 1.0 V
voltage bias at t=0. The different curves correspond to electrode
separation D=1.0 nm, 1.4 nm, 1.7 nm, 2.1 nm, 2.3 nm, 2.8 nm
and 3.0 nm, respectively.
Because the electrode charge is induced by ion
displacements, we expect that the nonmonotonic
charging kinetics should be closely correlated with
the ion motions. Figure 8 shows the evolution of the
ion numbers in the left half-cell of the EDLC during
the charging process. The total number of cations
increases sharply after applying the voltage bias for
all cases. Whereas anions move out of the left
half-cell at the initial stage of charging, they may
flow back into the left half-cell at late stages. As
predicted by TDDFT, the non-monatomic charging
behavior is closely related to layer-by-layer
formation and strong charge correlations between
cations and anions in the IL. The oscillatory flow of
anions is not captured by the conventional EC
models.
Figure 8 Evolutions of the numbers of cations and anions in the
left half-cell of the model electrochemical system at different
electrode separations during the charging process. In each panel,
the black line is for the number of BMI cations and the red line
is for the number of PF6 anions.
4 Conclusions
In this work, we have studied the electrochemical
properties and the charging behavior of a model
electric double layer (EDL) capacitor composed of a
room temperature ionic liquid (RTIL) sandwiched
between two planar electrodes. Using a
coarse-grained model for the RTIL and
constant-potential molecular dynamics simulations,
we investigated the influences of the separation
between the electrodes on the ionic and charge
distributions, the differential capacitance, the total
stored charge, and their variations with time during
the constant-potential charging processes. We
identified oscillatory variations of both the total electrode
0 5 10 150.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Q (
e/n
m2)
t (ps)
2.1 nm
2.3 nm
2.8 nm
3.1 nm
1.0 nm
1.4 nm
1.7 nm
0 10 20 30
-2
0
2
4
D = 3.1 nmD = 2.8 nm
D = 1.4 nm
BMI
PF6
# o
f io
ns
D = 1.0 nm
0 20 40 60 80
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
# o
f io
ns
0 20 40 60 80 100-0.4
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
# o
f io
ns
t (ps)
0 20 40 60 80 100-0.4
0.0
0.4
0.8
# o
f io
ns
t (ps)
www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research
9 Nano Res.
charge and differential capacitance as functions of the
separation between the electrodes similar to previous
results obtained from the classical density functional
theory and all atom simulations for porous electrodes.
The EDL charging kinetics is highly sensitive to the
separation between electrodes; it is most sluggish when
the separation coincides with the valley points of the
oscillatory profile for the electrode charge or the
differential capacitance. While the variation of electrode
charge can be approximately correlated with the
equivalent circuit model, the charging kinetics exhibits
strong nonmonotonic behavior at the beginning stage of
EDL charging, in particular at small electrode separations.
The nonmonotonic charging behavior arises from the
strong correlations between cations and anions of
confined ionic liquids that are ignored in conventional
theories.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported as part of the Fluid
Interface Reactions, Structures and Transport (FIRST)
Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded
by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science,
Office of Basic Energy Sciences. K.X. is grateful to the
Chinese Scholarship Council for the visiting
fellowship. Additional support is provided by
National Natural Science foundation of China, No.
21276138 and Tsinghua University Foundation, No.
2013108930. The numerical calculations were
performed at the National Energy Research Scientific
Computing Center (NERSC).
References [1] Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y. Materials for
electrochemical capacitors. Nat Mater 2008,
7, 845-854.
[2] Feng, G.;Li, S.;Presser, V.; Cummings, P. T.
Molecular Insights into Carbon
Supercapacitors Based on Room-
Temperature Ionic Liquids. J Phys Chem Lett
2013, 4, 3367-3376.
[3] Yu, A. Electrochemical supercapacitors for
energy storage and delivery : fundamentals and
applications; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton,
2013.
[4] Beguin, F. O.; Fra ckowiak, E. B.
Supercapacitors: materials, systems, and
applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2013.
[5] Frackowiak, E. Carbon materials for
supercapacitor application. Physical
Chemistry Chemical Physics 2007, 9,
1774-1785.
[6] Chmiola, J.;Yushin, G.;Gogotsi, Y.;Portet,
C.;Simon, P.; Taberna, P. L. Anomalous
increase in carbon capacitance at pore sizes
less than 1 nanometer. Science 2006, 313,
1760-1763.
[7] Raymundo-Pinero, E.;Kierzek, K.;
Machnikowski, J.; Beguin, F. Relationship
between the nanoporous texture of
activated carbons and their capacitance
properties in different electrolytes. Carbon
2006, 44, 2498-2507.
[8] Largeot, C.;Portet, C.;Chmiola, J.;Taberna, P.
L.;Gogotsi, Y.; Simon, P. Relation between
the ion size and pore size for an electric
double-layer capacitor. Journal of the
American Chemical Society 2008, 130, 2730-+.
[9] Galinski, M.; Lewandowski, A.; Stepniak, I.
Ionic liquids as electrolytes. Electrochimica
Acta 2006, 51, 5567-5580.
[10] Lu, X. Y.; Burrell, G.; Separovic, F.; Zhao, C.
Electrochemistry of Room Temperature
Protic Ionic Liquids: A Critical Assessment
for Use as Electrolytes in Electrochemical
Applications. J Phys Chem B 2012, 116,
9160-9170.
[11] Kim, T. Y.;Lee, H. W.;Stoller, M.;Dreyer, D.
R.;Bielawski, C. W.;Ruoff, R. S.; Suh, K. S.
High-Performance Supercapacitors Based
on Poly(ionic liquid)-Modified Graphene
Electrodes. Acs Nano 2011, 5, 436-442.
[12] Armand, M.;Endres, F.;MacFarlane, D.
R.;Ohno, H.; Scrosati, B. Ionic-liquid
materials for the electrochemical challenges
of the future. Nat Mater 2009, 8, 621-629.
[13] Huang, J. S.;Sumpter, B. G.; Meunier, V.
| www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp
10 Nano Res.
Theoretical model for nanoporous carbon
supercapacitors. Angew Chem Int Edit 2008,
47, 520-524.
[14] Fedorov, M. V.; Kornyshev, A. A. Ionic
Liquids at Electrified Interfaces. Chem Rev
2014, 114, 2978-3036.
[15] Jiang, D. E.;Jin, Z. H.; Wu, J. Z. Oscillation
of Capacitance inside Nanopores. Nano
Letters 2011, 11, 5373-5377.
[16] Wu, P.;Huang, J. S.;Meunier, V.;Sumpter, B.
G.; Qiao, R. Complex Capacitance Scaling
in Ionic Liquids-Filled Nanopores. Acs Nano
2011, 5, 9044-9051.
[17] Feng, G.; Cummings, P. T. Supercapacitor
Capacitance Exhibits Oscillatory Behavior
as a Function of Nanopore Size. J Phys Chem
Lett 2011, 2, 2859-2864.
[18] Jiang, D. E.; Wu, J. Z. Microscopic Insights
into the Electrochemical Behavior of
Nonaqueous Electrolytes in Electric
Double-Layer Capacitors. J Phys Chem Lett
2013, 4, 1260-1267.
[19] Newman, J. S.; Thomas-Alyea, K. E.
Electrochemical systems; J. Wiley: Hoboken,
N.J., 2004.
[20] Bazant, M. Z.;Kilic, M. S.;Storey, B. D.;
Ajdari, A. Towards an understanding of
induced-charge electrokinetics at large
applied voltages in concentrated solutions.
Adv Colloid Interfac 2009, 152, 48-88.
[21] Marconi, U. M. B.; Melchionna, S. Charge
Transport in Nanochannels: A Molecular
Theory. Langmuir 2012, 28, 13727-13740.
[22] Golovnev, A.; Trimper, S. Analytical
solution of the Poisson-Nernst-Planck
equations in the linear regime at an applied
dc-voltage. J Chem Phys 2011, 134, Artn
154902.
[23] Storey, B. D.; Bazant, M. Z. Effects of
electrostatic correlations on electrokinetic
phenomena. Phys Rev E 2012, 86, Artn
056303.
[24] Jiang, J.;Cao, D. P.;Jiang, D.-e.; Wu, J. Z.
Time-dependent density functional theory
for ion diffusion in electrochemical systems.
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2014.
[25] Pean, C.;Merlet, C.;Rotenberg, B.;Madden, P.
A.;Taberna, P. L.;Daffos, B.;Salanne, M.;
Simon, P. On the Dynamics of Charging in
Nanoporous Carbon-Based Supercapacitors.
Acs Nano 2014, 8, 1576-1583.
[26] Kondrat, S.;Wu, P.;Qiao, R.; Kornyshev, A.
A. Accelerating charging dynamics in
subnanometre pores. Nat Mater 2014, 13,
387-393.
[27] Merlet, C.;Rotenberg, B.;Madden, P.
A.;Taberna, P. L.;Simon, P.;Gogotsi, Y.;
Salanne, M. On the molecular origin of
supercapacitance in nanoporous carbon
electrodes. Nat Mater 2012, 11, 306-310.
[28] Roy, D.; Maroncelli, M. An Improved
Four-Site Ionic Liquid Model. J Phys Chem B
2010, 114, 12629-12631.
[29] Cole, M. W.; Klein, J. R. The Interaction
between Noble-Gases and the Basal-Plane
Surface of Graphite. Surf Sci 1983, 124,
547-554.
[30] Petersen, M. K.;Kumar, R.;White, H. S.;
Voth, G. A. A Computationally Efficient
Treatment of Polarizable Electrochemical
Cells Held at a Constant Potential. J Phys
Chem C 2012, 116, 4903-4912.
[31] Siepmann, J. I.; Sprik, M. Influence of
Surface-Topology and Electrostatic
Potential on Water Electrode Systems. J
Chem Phys 1995, 102, 511-524.
[32] Reed, S. K.;Lanning, O. J.; Madden, P. A.
Electrochemical interface between an ionic
liquid and a model metallic electrode. J
Chem Phys 2007, 126.
[33] Hess, B.;Kutzner, C.;van der Spoel, D.;
Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for
highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable
molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput
www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research
11 Nano Res.
2008, 4, 435-447.
[34] Nose, S. A Unified Formulation of the
Constant Temperature Molecular-
Dynamics Methods. J Chem Phys 1984, 81,
511-519.
[35] Hoover, W. G. Canonical Dynamics -
Equilibrium Phase-Space Distributions.
Phys Rev A 1985, 31, 1695-1697.
[36] Darden, T.;York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle
Mesh Ewald - an N.Log(N) Method for
Ewald Sums in Large Systems. J Chem Phys
1993, 98, 10089-10092.
[37] Yeh, I. C.; Berkowitz, M. L. Ewald
summation for systems with slab geometry.
J Chem Phys 1999, 111, 3155-3162.
[38] Black, J. M.;Walters, D.;Labuda, A.;Feng,
G.;Hillesheim, P. C.;Dai, S.;Cummings, P.
T.;Kalinin, S. V.;Proksch, R.; Balke, N.
Bias-Dependent Molecular-Level Structure
of Electrical Double Layer in Ionic Liquid
on Graphite. Nano Letters 2013, 13,
5954-5960.
[39] Limmer, D. T.;Merlet, C.;Salanne,
M.;Chandler, D.;Madden, P. A.;van Roij, R.;
Rotenberg, B. Charge Fluctuations in
Nanoscale Capacitors. Phys Rev Lett 2013,
111, Artn 106102.
[40] Merlet, C.;Pean, C.;Rotenberg, B.;Madden, P.
A.;Simon, P.; Salanne, M. Simulating
Supercapacitors: Can We Model Electrodes
As Constant Charge Surfaces? J Phys Chem
Lett 2013, 4, 264-268.
[41] Jiang, J.;Cao, D.;Jiang, D.-e.; Wu, J. Kinetic
Charging Inversion in Ionic Liquid Electric
Double Layers. The Journal of Physical
Chemistry Letters 2014, 5, 2195-2200.
www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research
Nano Res.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Molecular dynamics for the charging behavior of
nanostructured electric double layer capacitors
containing room temperature ionic liquids
Xian Kong1,2, Diannan Lu2(), Zheng Liu2(), and Jianzhong Wu1()
erside, CA 92521,USA
2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Supporting information to DOI 10.1007/s12274-****-****-* (automatically inserted by the publisher)
Figure S1 (a) Potential profile of between two electrodes separated by 12.3 nm under different voltage biases.
This demonstrates the viability of our simulation technique. (b) Q-V relation from constant voltage and
constant charge simulations. The collapse of two curves demonstrates the reliability of our simulation method.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
Po
ten
tial
(V
)
z (nm)
0V
2V
3V
4V
6V
9V
0 2 4 6 8 10
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2 constant V
constant Q
Q
e/n
m2
V (V)
| www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp
Nano Res.
Figure S2 Temperature change during the course of MD simulation for the model electrochemical system at
two electrode separations.
0 200 400 600300
360
420
480
540
T (
K)
Time (ps)
2.0 nm
5.0 nm
Address correspondence to [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]