Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.
-
Upload
luciano-eubanks -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.
![Page 1: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Molecular Clocks
Prediction of time from molecular divergence
![Page 2: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
• What is the molecular clock hypothesis?
• How do you detect deviations of the molecular clock hypothesis?
• Assuming a perfect molecular clock, what are the potential pitfalls in using it for dating?
• Dating with “relaxed” clocks
• Cautionary notes
![Page 3: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Molecular Clock
• Molecular divergence is ROUGHLY correlated with divergence of time
![Page 4: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Evidence for Rate Constancyin Hemoglobin
from Zuckerkandl and Pauling (1965)
![Page 5: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Given – a phylogenetic tree – branch lengths– a time estimate for
one (or more) node(s) C HD R M
110 MYA
• Can we date other nodes in the tree?
• Yes... if the rate of molecular change is constant across all branches
![Page 6: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Molecular Clock Hypothesis
• Amount of genetic difference between sequences is a function of time since separation
• Rate of molecular change is constant (enough) to predict times of divergence (within the bounds of particular genes and taxa)
![Page 7: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Page & Holmes p240
Rate Constancy?
![Page 8: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Rate Heterogeneity
• Rate of molecular evolution can differ between– nucleotide positions– genes– genomic regions– genomes within species (nuclear vs organelle)– species– over time
• If not considered, introduces bias into time estimates
![Page 9: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Cause Reason
Repair mechanisms
e.g. RNA viruses have
error-prone polymerases
Metabolic rate More free radicals
Generation time Copies DNA more frequently
Population size Effects mutation fixation rate
Rate Heterogeneity among lineages
![Page 10: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Local Clocks?
• Closely related species often share similar properties, likely to have similar rates
• For example– murid rodents on average 2-6 times faster
than apes and humans (Graur & Li p150)– mouse and rat rates are nearly equal (Graur &
Li p146)
![Page 11: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Cause Reason
Population size changes
Genetic drift more likely to fix neutral alleles in small population
Strength of selection changes over time
1. new role/environment
2. gene duplication
3. change in another gene
Rate Changes within a Lineage
![Page 12: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Identifying rate heterogeneity
Tests of molecular clock:
– Likelihood ratio test• identifies deviance from clock but not the deviant sequences
– Relative rates tests • compares rates of sister nodes using an outgroup
– Tajima test• Number of sites in which character shared by outgroup and
only one of two ingroups should be equal for both ingroups– Branch length test
• deviation of distance from root to leaf compared to average distance
![Page 13: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Likelihood Ratio Test
• estimate a phylogeny under molecular clock and without it– e.g. root-to-tip distances must be equal
• difference in likelihood ~ 2*Chi^2 with n-2 degrees of freedom (n = # taxa in tree)– asymptotically– when models are nested
![Page 14: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Relative Rates TestsSarich & Wilson 1973, Wu and Li 1985
• Tests whether distance between two taxa and an outgroup are equal (or average rate of two clades vs an outgroup)– need to compute expected variance – many triples to consider, and not independent (although
modifications such as Li & Bousquet 1992 correct for this)
• Lacks power, esp– short sequences– low rates of change
• Given length and number of variable sites in typical sequences used for dating, (Bromham et al 2000) says:– unlikely to detect moderate variation between lineages (1.5-4x)– likely to result in substantial error in date estimates
![Page 15: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Relative Rates TestsSarich & Wilson 1973, Wu and Li 1985
Taxon 2
Taxon 3 Outgroup
0
Taxon 1
Taxon 2
Taxon 3 Outgroup
Taxon 1
![Page 16: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Relative Rates TestsSarich & Wilson 1973, Wu and Li 1985
Taxon 2
Taxon 3 Outgroup
K01
K02
K03
0
H0: K01 = K02 or K01 - K02 = 0
K13 = K01 + K03 (1)K23 = K02 + K03 (2)K12 = K01 + K02 (3)
K01 = (K13 + K12 – K23 )/2 (4)K02 = (K12 + K23 – K13 )/2 (5)K03 = (K13 + K23 – K12 )/2 (6)
K01 – K02 = K13 - K23
Variance z = K13 - K23 \ [var (K13 - K23)] 1/2
Compare to normal distribution
Taxon 1
![Page 17: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Bayesian Relative Rates test (Wilcox et al. 2004)• MrBayes in conjunction with Cadence; variation is estimated from the
posterior distribution
• Cadence summarizes for all tree samples, the distance between specific taxa and the most recent common ancestor (MRCA)
![Page 18: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Measuring Evolutionary time with a molecular clock
1. Estimate genetic distance d = number amino acid replacements
2. Use paleontological data to determine date of common ancestor
T = time since divergence
3. Estimate calibration rate (number of genetic changes expected per unit time)
r = d / 2T
4. Calculate time of divergence for novel sequences
Tij = dij / 2r
![Page 19: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Perfect Molecular Clock
• Change linear function time (substitutions ~ Poisson) (variation is only due to stochastic error)
• Rates constant (positions/lineages)• Tree perfect• Molecular distance estimated perfectly• Calibration dates without error• Regression (time vs substitutions) without
error
![Page 20: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Poisson Variance(Assuming A Perfect Molecular Clock)
If mutation every MY• Poisson variance
– 95% lineages 15 MYA old have 8-22 substitutions
– 8 substitutions also could be 5 MYA
Molecular Systematics p532
![Page 21: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Estimating Substitution Rate
• Calculate separate rate for each data set (species/genes) using known date of divergence (from fossil, biogeography)
• One calibration point– Rate = d/2T
• More than one calibration point– use regression
![Page 22: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Calibration Complexities
• Cannot date fossils perfectly
• Fossils usually not direct ancestors– branched off tree before (after?) splitting
event.
• Impossible to pinpoint the age of last common ancestor of a group of living species
![Page 23: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Linear Regression
•Fix intercept at (0,0)•Fit line between
divergence estimates and calibration times
•Calculate regression and prediction confidence limits
•A = regression line•B1-B2 = 95% CI of
regression line•C1-C2 = 95% CI for
predicted time valuesMolecular Systematics p536
![Page 24: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Molecular DatingSources of Error (assuming
constant rates)• Both X and Y values only estimates
– substitution model could be incorrect– tree could be incorrect– errors in orthology assignment– Poisson variance is large
• Pairwise divergences correlated (Molec Systematics p534)– inflates correlation between divergence & time
• Sometimes calibrations correlated– if using derived calibration points
• Error in inferring slope• Confidence interval for predictions much larger than
confidence interval for slope
![Page 25: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Working Around Rate Heterogeneity
1. Identify lineages that deviate and remove them
2. Quantify degree of rate variation to put limits on possible divergence dates– requires several calibration dates, not always
available– gives very conservative estimates of molecular dates
3. Explicitly model rate variation (relaxed clocks)
![Page 26: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Relaxing the Molecular ClockRutschmann 2006 (review)
• Likelihood analysis– Assign each branch a rate parameter
• explosion of parameters, not realistic– User can partition branches based on domain knowledge– Rates of partitions are independent
• Nonparametric methods smooth rates along tree and penalized likelihood (program r8s)
• Bayesian approach– stochastic model of evolutionary change– prior distribution of rates:
• Autocorrelation: BEAST and Multidivtime• Non-autocorrelation: BEAST (can also incorporate uncertainty in topology)
![Page 27: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Multiple Gene Loci
• “Trying to estimate time of divergence from one protein is like trying to estimate the average height of humans by measuring one human”
--Molecular Systematics p539
• Ideally: – use multiple genes– use multiple calibration points
![Page 28: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Even so, be Very cautious about divergence time inferences
• Point estimates are absurd
• Sample errors often based only on the difference between estimates in the same study
• Even estimates with confidence intervals unlikely to really capture all sources of variance
![Page 29: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
General ReferencesReviews/Critiques1. Bromham and Penny. The modern molecular clock, Nature
Genetics, 2003.2. Graur and Martin. Reading the entrails of chickens...the illusion of
precision. Trends in Genetics, 2004.3. Rutschmann.2006 Molecular dating of phylogenetic trees: A brief
review of current methods that estimate divergence times. Diversity and Distributions
Textbooks:1. Molecular Systematics. 2nd edition. Edited by Hillis, Moritz, and
Mable.2. Inferring Phylogenies. Felsenstein.3. Molecular Evolution, a phylogenetic approach. Page and Holmes.4. Chapter 11 textbook “The Phylogenetic Handbook”
![Page 30: Molecular Clocks Prediction of time from molecular divergence.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/5518b597550346c31f8b510b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Dealing with Rate Heterogeneity1. Yang and Yoder. Comparison of likelihood and bayesian methods for
estimating divergence times. Syst. Biol, 2003.2. Kishino, Thorne, and Bruno. Performance of a divergence time
estimation method under a probabilistic model of rate evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol, 2001.
3. Huelsenbeck, Larget, and Swofford. A compound poisson process for relaxing the molecular clock. Genetics, 2000.
Testing for Rate heterogeneity1. Takezaki, Rzhetsky and Nei. Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock
and linearized trees. Mol. Bio. Evol., 1995.2. Bromham, Penny, Rambaut, and Hendy. The power of relative rates
test depends on the data. J Mol Evol, 2000.3. Wilcox, T. P., F. J. Garcia de Leon, D. A. Hendrickson, and D. M.
Hillis. 2004. Convergence among cave catfishes: long-branch attraction and a Bayesian relative rates test. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:1101-1113.
Rate Heterogeneity References